Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Thanks to all the folks on the plane tour to glaciers

2015-05-23 Thread Jay S. Bryant
Vincent, So sorry you were not feeling well during the tour. Those things happen though...No worries. We were glad to get the e-mail letting us know that you were ok and feeling better! Glad that you could join us on the trip and see the Alpine lake and get pictures with us. I will send

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] [Cinder] FFE for "Clear migration_status from a destination volume if migration fails"

2015-04-07 Thread Jay S. Bryant
Mitsuhiro, I had already put a +2 on this, so I am agreeable to an FFE. Mike or John, what are your thoughts? Jay On 04/06/2015 06:27 PM, Mitsuhiro Tanino wrote: Hello, I would like to get a FFE for patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/161328/. This patch fixes the volume migration probl

Re: [openstack-dev] cinder[stable/juno] Fix the eqlx driver to retry on ssh timeout(Backport)

2015-04-06 Thread Jay S. Bryant
Rajini, This is a relatively small change. Mike, what do you think about granting an Exception for this? Jay On 04/06/2015 04:33 PM, rajini_...@dell.com wrote: *Dell - Internal Use - Confidential * Hi Can we have a freeze exception on this CR pl? https://review.openstack.org/154123 Clos

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Current Status of IBM 3rd Party CI Testing ...

2015-04-06 Thread Jay S. Bryant
Anita, My apologies. The original communication on the issue came from Mike via the mailing list so I was attempting to continue the public discussion here. I will make sure to not do this in the future. Jay On 04/06/2015 03:19 PM, Anita Kuno wrote: On 04/06/2015 04:03 PM, Jay S. Bryant

[openstack-dev] [cinder] Current Status of IBM 3rd Party CI Testing ...

2015-04-06 Thread Jay S. Bryant
All, I just wanted to provide an update on 3rd Party CI Testing for IBM's drivers. It was noted late last month that not all of IBM's drivers were running the required 304 test cases. That issue has been resolved for all 3rd Party CI's except for DS8k. The maintainer of that system has bee

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] not running for PTL for liberty cycle

2015-04-06 Thread Jay S. Bryant
+1000 You have done a great job Doug! Thank you for your leadership! Jay On 04/03/2015 08:11 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: On 03/04/15 08:50 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: Team, I have decided not to run for PTL for Oslo for the next cycle. Serving as PTL for the last three releases has been a re

[openstack-dev] [oslo][cinder][nova][neutron] going forward to oslo-config-generator ...

2015-03-20 Thread Jay S. Bryant
All, Let me start with the TLDR; Cinder, Nova and Neutron have lots of configuration options that need to be processed by oslo-config-generator to create the .conf.sample file. There are a couple of different ways this could be done. I have one proposal out, which has raised concerns, ther

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] May you reconsider about huawei driver?

2015-03-20 Thread Jay S. Bryant
Mike, Looks like this removal may have been a mistake. We should readdress. Jay On 03/20/2015 05:59 AM, Erlon Cruz wrote: I agree with John (comment on the mentioned patchset). Also, I expected one change removing all drivers that does not report on CI. There's one of us (HUSDriver) that is

Re: [openstack-dev] Deprecation warnings considered harmful?

2015-03-12 Thread Jay S. Bryant
Duncan, If you see any of these coming out of Cinder (not oslo) please get a bug to me. I think I have them all removed but need to know if I have missed anything. Thanks! Jay On 03/12/2015 04:24 AM, Duncan Thomas wrote: ubuntu@devstack-multiattach:~/devstack$ cinder-manage db sync /usr/loc

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] K3 Feature Freeze Exception request for bp/nfs-backup

2015-03-11 Thread Jay S. Bryant
All, I will sponsor this. Patch just needs to be rebased. Jay On 03/11/2015 10:20 AM, Tom Barron wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I hereby solicit a feature freeze exception for the NFS backup review [1]. Although only about 140 lines of non-test code, this review comple

[openstack-dev] [cinder] Etherpad for volume replication created ...

2015-02-12 Thread Jay S. Bryant
All, Several members of the Cinder team and I were discussing the current state of volume replication while trying to figure out the best way to resolve bug 1383524 [1]. The outcome of the discussion was a decision to hold off on integrating volume replication support for additional drivers.

[openstack-dev] [cinder] organizing tempest test development for volume replication

2015-02-11 Thread Jay S. Bryant
All, One of the concerns raised with regards to volume migration was the lack of tempest testing for the functionality. Since they I have had some interest indicated in helping this effort. So, to get things started I have created an etherpad to track development of such test cases and to s

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Feature Freeze Exception Request - bp/linux-systemz

2015-02-09 Thread Jay S. Bryant
Mike, A FFE for this has been submitted to Nova and is being sponsored by Matt Riedemann: [1] Assuming that goes through soon, can we please re-address? Thanks! Jay [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org/msg45430.html On 02/09/2015 12:23 PM, Mike Perez wrote:

[openstack-dev] [cinder] Volume Replication and Migration bug triage ...

2015-02-06 Thread Jay S. Bryant
All, In discussion with Mike Perez earlier this week the following bugs were highlighted in Volume Migration and Volume Replication. IBM is focusing on investigating and resolving these bugs. I will be putting out updates as we progress towards resolution of these issues. Replication: /h

[openstack-dev] [cinder] More Details for Mid-Cycle meetup:

2015-01-26 Thread Jay S. Bryant
All, I have updated the mid-cycle meetup etherpad (https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-kilo-midcycle-meetup) with more details with regards to finding the right building on the IBM site and have also added my cell phone number to the notes. Please don't hesitate to call or text me with q

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Cutoff deadlines for cinder drivers

2015-01-10 Thread Jay S. Bryant
I think what we discussed was that existing drivers were supposed to have something working by the end of k-2, or at least have something close to working. For new drivers they had to have 3rd party CI working by the end of Kilo. Duncan, correct me if I am wrong. Jay On 01/10/2015 04:52 PM, M

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Etherpad for the Cinder midcycle meetup

2015-01-10 Thread Jay S. Bryant
Mike, Thanks for putting this out there again. A reminder, if you are planning to attend, please update the etherpad so that I can get an accurate number in attendance and get all the security details set up. Thank you! Jay On 01/10/2015 04:00 PM, Mike Perez wrote: The meetup will be in A

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] dropping namespace packages

2015-01-10 Thread Jay S. Bryant
Ihar, I agree that we should do something to enforce using the appropriate namespace so that we don't have the wrong usage sneak in. I haven't gotten any rules written yet. Have had to attend to a family commitment the last few days. Hope that I can tackle the namspace changes next week.

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] Swift object-updater and container-updater

2015-01-09 Thread Jay S. Bryant
Minwoo, The cherry-picks for the contain-updater and object-updater back to stable/juno are now available for review: https://review.openstack.org/146211 and https://review.openstack.org/134082 Jay On 01/08/2015 09:21 AM, Minwoo Bae wrote: Hi, to whom it may concern: Jay Bryant and I woul

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] Swift object-updater and container-updater

2015-01-09 Thread Jay S. Bryant
Minwoo, It is important to understand that Icehouse has gone into a security fixes only mode. It is too late in the stable process to be making notable changes for anything other than security issues. The patch for the fork bomb like problem in object-auditor is in Icehouse: https://review

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] [sdk] Proposal to achieve consistency in client side sorting

2015-01-06 Thread Jay S. Bryant
Steven, Thank you for continuing to pursue this. Adding this functionality and having it consistent will be a good thing. The plan for Cinder looks good to me and is consistent with Mike and Duncan's input. I look forward to seeing patches for Cinder. Jay On 01/06/2015 10:03 AM, Steven K

[openstack-dev] [stable-maint] acceptable changes for stable/icehouse

2015-01-05 Thread Jay S. Bryant
All, We have been getting a number of non-security patches proposed to stable/icehouse for Cinder. The cores were discussing what was ok to put into icehouse at this point in time and couldn't agree as to whether we were at the point of only accepting security changes. Appreciate advice on

Re: [openstack-dev] [3rd-party-ci] Cinder CI and CI accounts

2014-12-23 Thread Jay S. Bryant
John and Ramy, Thanks for the feedback. So, we will create an IBM Storage CI Check account and slowly deprecate the multiple accounts as we consolidate the hardware. Jay On 12/23/2014 08:11 PM, Asselin, Ramy wrote: I agree with John. Option 4: one ci account for all drivers. The only val

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] Logging formats and i18n

2014-12-22 Thread Jay S. Bryant
John, Thank you for starting this discussion and Doug, thank you for clarifying. Your explanation below helps a lot! Jay On 12/22/2014 12:13 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: On Dec 22, 2014, at 1:05 PM, John Griffith wrote: On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Ben Nemec wrote: On 12/22/2014 09:4

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Anyone knows whether there is freezing day of spec approval?

2014-12-16 Thread Jay S. Bryant
Dave, My apologies. We have not yet set a day that we are freezing BP/Spec approval for Cinder. We had a deadline in November for new drivers being proposed but haven't frozen other proposals yet. I mixed things up with Nova's 12/18 cutoff. Not sure when we will be cutting off BPs for Cin

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] Exception proposals for 2014.2.1

2014-12-04 Thread Jay S. Bryant
On 12/04/2014 05:01 PM, Alan Pevec wrote: 2014-12-04 23:00 GMT+01:00 Jay S. Bryant : Finally was able to get the master version through the gate and cherry-picked it here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/139194/ That one has made it through the check. So, if it isn't too late, it coul

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] Exception proposals for 2014.2.1

2014-12-04 Thread Jay S. Bryant
On 12/03/2014 01:17 PM, Alan Pevec wrote: 2014-12-02 17:15 GMT+01:00 Jay S. Bryant : Cinder https://review.openstack.org/137537 - small change and limited to the VMWare driver +1 I think this is fine to make an exception for. one more Cinder exception proposal was added in StableJuno

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] Exception proposals for 2014.2.1

2014-12-02 Thread Jay S. Bryant
On 12/02/2014 07:22 AM, Alan Pevec wrote: Hi all, here are exception proposal I have collected when preparing for the 2014.2.1 release, stable-maint members please have a look! General: cap Oslo and client library versions - sync from openstack/requirements stable/juno, would be good to inclu

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] New config options, no default change

2014-12-02 Thread Jay S. Bryant
On 12/02/2014 02:31 AM, Alan Pevec wrote: What is the text that should be included in the commit messages to make sure that it is picked up for release notes? I'm not sure anyone tracks commit messages to create release notes. Let's use existing DocImpact tag, I'll add check for this in the r

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] New config options, no default change

2014-12-01 Thread Jay S. Bryant
On 11/25/2014 08:10 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 16/11/14 20:17, Jay S. Bryant wrote: All, This is a question I have been struggling with for Cinder recently. Where do we draw the line on backports. How do we handle config changes? One thing

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Anyone Using the Open Solaris ZFS Driver?

2014-11-25 Thread Jay S. Bryant
Monty, I agree that upgrade is not a significant concern right now if the existing driver is not working. Drew, I am having trouble following where you guys are currently at with this work. I would like to help get you guys up and going during Kilo. I am concerned that maybe there is conf

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] mid-cycle meet-up planning ...

2014-11-19 Thread Jay S. Bryant
All, For those of you that weren't able to make the Kilo meet-up in Paris I wanted to send out a note regarding Cinder's Kilo mid-cycle meet-up. IBM has offered to host it in, warm, sunny, Austin, Texas. The planned dates are January 27, 28 and 29, 2015. I have put together an etherpad wit

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Anyone Using the Open Solaris ZFS Driver?

2014-11-17 Thread Jay S. Bryant
Drew, I would say that it would be good to open a Blueprint for this and push the code up for review. Even if you don't have CI ready yet you can post results of a driver cert test [1] and we can start reviewing the code while you work on finishing up the process of getting your CI running.

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] New config options, no default change

2014-11-16 Thread Jay S. Bryant
All, This is a question I have been struggling with for Cinder recently. Where do we draw the line on backports. How do we handle config changes? One thing for Cinder I am also considering, in addition to whether it changes the default functionality, is whether it is specific to the submitt

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] The right (and the wrong) way of handling module imports in oslo-incubator

2014-11-14 Thread Jay S. Bryant
On 11/14/2014 03:31 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 14/11/14 09:14, Flavio Percoco wrote: On 13/11/14 23:25 +, Amrith Kumar wrote: At the suggestion of Doug Hellmann, and relative to a conversation with him and Flavio at Summit. Doug suggested

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] [All?] "Status" vs "State"

2014-10-02 Thread Jay S. Bryant
On 10/02/2014 11:14 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: On 10/02/2014 11:23 AM, Jay S. Bryant wrote: As I re-read this I think maybe you have answered my question but want to be clear. You feel that 'State' is the only term that should be used. Based on the definitions above, that would make

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] [All?] "Status" vs "State"

2014-10-02 Thread Jay S. Bryant
Good questions! Jay, I have a request for some clarification in-line. On 10/01/2014 01:37 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: Hi Akihiro! IMO, this is precisely where having an API standards working group can help to make the user experience of our public APIs less frustrating. Such a working group should

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] adding James Carey to oslo-i18n-core

2014-09-26 Thread Jay S. Bryant
On 09/26/2014 06:46 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 9/25/2014 11:04 AM, Ben Nemec wrote: +1. He's on the short list of people who actually understand how all that lazy translation stuff works. :-) -Ben On 09/23/2014 04:03 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: James Carey (jecarey) from IBM has done the 3r

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Not seeking another term as PTL

2014-09-23 Thread Jay S. Bryant
John, Thank you for being welcoming to me when I started with Cinder during Havana and for all the mentoring and encouragement you have given since then. I think the fact that Cinder is such a great group to work with has a lot to owe to your leadership and guidance. Thank you! I look for

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] 2 weeks in the bug tracker

2014-09-22 Thread Jay S. Bryant
On 09/21/2014 07:37 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 9/19/2014 8:13 AM, Sean Dague wrote: I've spent the better part of the last 2 weeks in the Nova bug tracker to try to turn it into something that doesn't cause people to run away screaming. I don't remember exactly where we started at open bug

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][FFE] request for exceptions in xiv_ds8k driver

2014-09-08 Thread Jay S. Bryant
Alon, Thanks, I have added your request to the etherpad https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/juno-cinder-approved-ffes and it will undergo review. Thanks, Jay On Mon, 2014-09-08 at 21:55 +0300, Alon Marx wrote: > Hi, > > Please consider the following code changes as Feature Freeze > Exceptions.

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev][Cinder] Cinder Core nomination

2014-08-14 Thread Jay S. Bryant
Great nomination Walt. Thank you! +1 Thank you Xing for your contributions! Jay On Thu, 2014-08-14 at 06:55 +, Boring, Walter wrote: > Hey guys, >I wanted to pose a nomination for Cinder core. > > Xing Yang. > She has been active in the cinder community for many releases and has worke

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] The future of the integrated release

2014-08-11 Thread Jay S. Bryant
John, I spent the drive to the Minneapolis Airport thinking about this chain of e-mails. Hope these thoughts help ... On Thu, 2014-08-07 at 07:55 -0600, John Griffith wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 7:33 AM, Anne Gentle > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Aug

Re: [openstack-dev] Mentor program?

2014-07-24 Thread Jay S. Bryant
Josh, I agree that the mailing list is a hard place to provide such guidance and direction. I find mailing lists intimidating. Had taken me some time to be comfortable submitting here. After my response to this note the other day I was pinged internally via our messaging client asking for some

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Integrated with iSCSI target Question

2014-07-21 Thread Jay S. Bryant
Johnson, I am not sure what you mean by 'attach volume manually'. Do you mean when you do a 'nova volume-attach'? If so, then, yes, the process will use the appropriate iscsi_helper and iscsi_ip_address to configure the attachment. Does that answer your question? Jay On Mon, 2014-07-21 at 12:

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] cinder querying nova-api

2014-07-20 Thread Jay S. Bryant
Abbass, There has been discussion around this in the past. As it would be a significant feature you should open a spec for it. Do a 'git clone https://github.com/openstack/cinder-specs. There are directions in there for actually submitting the spec. Thanks! Jay On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 09:01 +02

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] gettextutils enable_lazy not working

2014-07-20 Thread Jay S. Bryant
Mike, Thanks for pointing this out. I thought I had gotten all of these and this supports the need for the hacking check I will work on. We also hit errors like this on our internal CI due to a bad merge. Anyway, I am on top of this. Will fix asap. Jay On Sun, 2014-07-20 at 15:49 -0700, Mike

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][specs] Please stop doing specs for any changes in projects

2014-07-20 Thread Jay S. Bryant
Thanks Duncan and also Dolph, I should have made the question broader. :-) On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 13:22 +0100, Duncan Thomas wrote: > On 16 July 2014 03:57, Jay S. Bryant wrote: > > John, > > > > So you have said a few times that the specs are a learning process. > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] "recheck no bug" and comment

2014-07-20 Thread Jay S. Bryant
I agree that there are cases where a bug is overkill and it would be nice to add a note showing I did put some thought into doing the recheck no bug. Just my two cents. On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 17:07 +0100, Derek Higgins wrote: > On 16/07/14 14:48, Steve Martinelli wrote: > > What are the benefits o

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][specs] Please stop doing specs for any changes in projects

2014-07-15 Thread Jay S. Bryant
John, So you have said a few times that the specs are a learning process. What do you feel with have learned thus far using specs? I think you had the hope that it would help organize targeting blueprints and not missing things for a release. Do you feel that is working? I would like to hear mo

Re: [openstack-dev] Log / error message format best practices & standards

2014-07-09 Thread Jay S. Bryant
Boden, Thanks for bringing this up: On Thu, 2014-06-26 at 12:14 -0400, boden wrote: > We were recently having a discussion over here in trove regarding a > standardized format to use for log and error messages - obviously > consistency is ideal (within and across projects). As this discussion

Re: [openstack-dev] Commit the cinder Driver

2014-05-29 Thread Jay S. Bryant
Mardan, Note, you will also need to follow the new Cinder Specs process for Juno BluePrints. You can find details here: [1] Jay [1] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2014/cinder.2014-05-28-16.00.log.html#l-437 On Wed, 2014-05-07 at 18:48 +0530, Swapnil Kulkarni wrote: > Missed som

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][globalization] Need input on how to proceed .

2014-05-02 Thread Jay S. Bryant
not need, then great, makes review and merge even easier. > > Thanks > > On 28 April 2014 17:03, Jay S. Bryant wrote: > > Duncan, > > > > Thanks for the response. Have some additional thoughts, in-line, below: > > > > > > On Mon, 2014-04-28 at 1

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] About store faults info for volumes

2014-05-02 Thread Jay S. Bryant
On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 10:20 -0700, Mike Perez wrote: > On 06:49 Wed 30 Apr , Zhangleiqiang (Trump) wrote: > > Hi stackers: > > > > I found when a instance status become "error", I will see the detailed > > fault info at times when I "show" the detail of Instance. And it is very > > conv

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][globalization] Need input on how to proceed .

2014-04-28 Thread Jay S. Bryant
about it, I don't know that the debug translation removal needs to be dependent, but we could work it out that way if you feel that is important. Let me know what you think. Thanks! > On 27 April 2014 00:20, Jay S. Bryant wrote: > > All, > > > > I am looking for feedba

[openstack-dev] [cinder][globalization] Need input on how to proceed .

2014-04-26 Thread Jay S. Bryant
All, I am looking for feedback on how to complete implementation of i18n support for Cinder. I need to open a new BluePrint for Juno as soon as the cinder-specs process is available. In the mean time I would like to start working on this and need feedback on the scope I should undertake with thi

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] proposal of definitions/processes for cinder-spec

2014-04-24 Thread Jay S. Bryant
On Thu, 2014-04-24 at 15:11 -0700, Walter A. Boring IV wrote: > On 04/23/2014 05:09 PM, Jay S. Bryant wrote: > > All, > > > > I have gotten questions from our driver developers asking for details > > regarding the move to using cinder-specs for proposing Blueprints. I &

[openstack-dev] [cinder] proposal of definitions/processes for cinder-spec

2014-04-23 Thread Jay S. Bryant
All, I have gotten questions from our driver developers asking for details regarding the move to using cinder-specs for proposing Blueprints. I brought this topic up in today's Cinder Weekly Meeting, but the meeting was lightly attended so we decided to move the discussion here. I am going to pu

Re: [openstack-dev] does exception need localize or not?

2014-03-17 Thread Jay S Bryant
in? Appreciate your thoughts on the subject! Jay S. Bryant IBM Cinder Subject Matter Expert & Cinder Core Member Department 7YLA, Building 015-2, Office E125, Rochester, MN Telephone: (507) 253-4270, FAX (507) 253-6410 TIE Line: 553-4270 E-Ma

Re: [openstack-dev] [Oslo] Improving oslo-incubator update.py

2014-03-14 Thread Jay S Bryant
From: Brant Knudson To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" , Date: 03/14/2014 02:21 PM Subject:Re: [openstack-dev] [Oslo] Improving oslo-incubator update.py On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Jay S Bryant wrote: It would be great i

Re: [openstack-dev] Duplicate code for processing REST APIs

2014-03-14 Thread Jay S Bryant
From: Duncan Thomas To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" , Date: 03/14/2014 11:56 AM Subject:Re: [openstack-dev] Duplicate code for processing REST APIs On 13 March 2014 21:13, Roman Podoliaka wrote: > Hi Steven, > > Code from openstack/common/

Re: [openstack-dev] [Oslo] Improving oslo-incubator update.py

2014-03-14 Thread Jay S Bryant
From: Duncan Thomas To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" , Date: 03/14/2014 11:49 AM Subject:Re: [openstack-dev] [Oslo] Improving oslo-incubator update.py On 14 March 2014 16:10, Jay S Bryant wrote: > --> Duncan, It is import

Re: [openstack-dev] [Oslo] Improving oslo-incubator update.py

2014-03-14 Thread Jay S Bryant
From: Brant Knudson To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" , Date: 03/14/2014 10:26 AM Subject:Re: [openstack-dev] [Oslo] Improving oslo-incubator update.py On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Duncan Thomas wrote: On 15 January 2014 18:53, Brant

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] FFE Request: Oslo: i18n Message improvements

2014-03-07 Thread Jay S Bryant
penstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev All, Thanks for taking the time to consider/discuss this. Some good lessons learned on this end. Look forward to getting this in early in Juno. Jay S. Bryant IBM Cinder Subject Matter Expert & Cinder Core Member___

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] FFE Request: Oslo: i18n Message improvements

2014-03-07 Thread Jay S Bryant
we are talking about *another* oslo sync. -1 -Sean -- Sean Dague Samsung Research America s...@dague.net / sean.da...@samsung.com http://dague.net [attachment "signature.asc" deleted by Jay S Bryant/Rochester/IBM] ___ OpenStac

Re: [openstack-dev] Proposal to move from Freenode to OFTC

2014-03-04 Thread Jay S Bryant
From: Brian Cline To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, Date: 03/04/2014 12:29 PM Subject:Re: [openstack-dev] Proposal to move from Freenode to OFTC On 03/04/2014 05:01 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > James E. Blair wrote: >> Freenode has been having a rough time lately due to a s

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] [Nova]Do you think volume force delete operation should not apply to the volume being used?

2014-02-25 Thread Jay S Bryant
I would agree. I don't think that Cinder should/could be able to act upon Nova's state for the VM. Force-delete is really in place as a backup to clean-up after certain failures in Cinder. Other mechanisms are in place to handle issues in Nova. Jay S. Bryant IBM Cind

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Some questions about Rest API and log messages translation

2014-02-19 Thread Jay S Bryant
Response marked with >> below. Jay From: Doug Hellmann To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" , Date: 02/19/2014 09:22 AM Subject:Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Some questions about Rest API and log messages translation On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 1

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] lazy translation is breaking Heat

2014-02-18 Thread Jay S Bryant
ning again. Jay S. Bryant IBM Cinder Subject Matter Expert & Cinder Core Member Department 7YLA, Building 015-2, Office E125, Rochester, MN Telephone: (507) 253-4270, FAX (507) 253-6410 TIE Line: 553-4270 E-Mail: jsbry

Re: [openstack-dev] Grizzly volume quotas

2014-02-05 Thread Jay S Bryant
Joe, Ah! So, those aren't for Cinder Volume but for nova-volume. Ok, so there isn't really a bug then. Sorry for speaking too quickly. Thanks for the info! Jay S. Bryant IBM Cinder Subject Matter Expert & Cinder Core Member Department 7YLA, Building 015-2, Office E

Re: [openstack-dev] Grizzly volume quotas

2014-02-05 Thread Jay S Bryant
Pat, I see the same behavior on an Icehouse level install. So, I think you may have found a bug. I would open the bug to python-novaclient to start with, but it may end up coming back to Cinder. Jay S. Bryant IBM Cinder Subject Matter Expert & Cinder Core Member Department

Re: [openstack-dev] Cinder Stability Hack-a-thon

2014-02-03 Thread Jay S Bryant
Mike, Great idea! I can participate remotely. Let me know how I can be of the best help! Jay S. Bryant IBM Cinder Subject Matter Expert & Cinder Core Member Department 7YLA, Building 015-2, Office E125, Rochester, MN Telephone: (507) 253-4270, FAX (507) 253-6410 TIE Line: 553-42

Re: [openstack-dev] Proposed Logging Standards

2014-01-27 Thread Jay S Bryant
Sean and John, I would be happy to help out with this for Cinder. Let me know how I can help. Jay S. Bryant IBM Cinder Subject Matter Expert & Cinder Core Member Department 7YLA, Building 015-2, Office E125, Rochester, MN Telephone: (507) 253-4270, FAX (507) 253-6410 TIE Line:

Re: [openstack-dev] Proposal for dd disk i/o performance blueprint of cinder.

2014-01-15 Thread Jay S Bryant
There is already an option that can be set in cinder.conf using 'volume_clear=none' Is there a reason that that option is not sufficient? Jay S. Bryant IBM Cinder Subject Matter Expert & Cinder Core Member Department 7YLA, Building 015-2, Office E125, Rochester, MN T

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] weekly meeting

2013-12-17 Thread Jay S Bryant
John, I am flexible. I am fine with trying to move the time to 04:00 or 05:00 UTC or we can alternate. The one concern with alternation is that it may lead to confusion and less attendance, but I am certainly open to trying it. Jay S. Bryant IBM Cinder Subject Matter Expert

Re: [openstack-dev] Tool for detecting commonly misspelled words

2013-12-03 Thread Jay S Bryant
good commit message structure. When combined with FlySpell many of the simple mistakes can be avoided. Jay S. Bryant IBM Cinder Subject Matter Expert & Cinder Core Member Department 7YLA, Building 015-2, Office E125, Rochester, MN Telephone: (507) 253-4270, FAX

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Policy on spelling and grammar

2013-11-11 Thread Jay S Bryant
Agreed that any -1's should require a suggestion for a way to resolve the issue. I haven't seen people -1'ing without suggestions for improvement though. I think, generally, people help explain why a change is needed. Jay S. Bryant Linux Developer - OpenStack Ent

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Policy on spelling and grammar

2013-11-11 Thread Jay S Bryant
ided. The point of OpenStack is to have a collaborative community. Some people bring better spelling and grammar to the table than others as a contribution. Jay S. Bryant Linux Developer - OpenStack Enterprise Edition Department 7YLA, Building 015-2, Office E125, Roc

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc] Proposal to recognize indirect contributions to our code base

2013-11-11 Thread Jay S Bryant
available as a result through websites like Stackalytics (http://stackalytics.com/) . Highlighting the sponsors of individual commits seems unnecessary. That's my two cents. Jay S. Bryant Linux Developer - OpenStack Enterprise Edition Department 7YLA, Building 015

<    1   2   3