Re: How does pax web load jsp tag libraries?

Hi Christian The pax-web-jsp module is scanning the war or wab for taglib descriptors. I can't provide deeper details without the code but it's what I remember. Achim will provide further details since I'm not around. Regards JB On Feb 7, 2017, 08:28, at 08:28, Christian Schneider

Re: Karaf container not loaded from pax exam 4.9.1

Hi, can you try with Pax Exam 4.10.0 I released last night ? Thanks, Regards JB On 01/31/2017 06:56 AM, Namrata Kapse wrote: Hello, We are using costomise karaf 4.0.7. For Module testing tried with pax exam 4.9.1 and 4.9.2 both are not loading the container of Karaf. When we run test

Re: [pax logging] Need new version in jira

Done: I created versions 1.9.2 and 1.8.8. Regards JB On 02/22/2017 12:09 PM, Christian Schneider wrote: I just fixed this issue: https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXLOGGING-225 I would like to set the fix version but there is currently no unreleased version in jira. Can someone add the next

Re: Pax-cdi 1.0.0-RC2 missing requirements on CdiOsgi

Hi Charlie Let me take a look. Regards JB On Feb 25, 2017, 20:32, at 20:32, Charlie Mordant wrote: >Hi Opened guys! > >I'm trying the newest and greatest 1.0.0-RC2 version of pax-cdi. >While trying to load some CDI fragments (aries tx weld transactional >support and

Re: Headsup - Pax-Web 4.3.0 Minor version Bump

+1 I will prepare the first release then. Regards JB On Saturday, September 3, 2016 at 12:07:37 AM UTC+2, Achim Nierbeck wrote: > > Hi, > > today I detected that we have some changes on a couple of packages which > actually require a minor version bump and also one which would require a >

Re: Pax Logging release?

they cannot > get the latest kid on the block, and should settle with a legacy Pax > Logging version. > > Don't you think? > > Cheers. > > On Tuesday, 6 September 2016 16:23:46 UTC+2, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >> >> Correct, I meant Java7 (not Java8). >>

Re: Pax Logging release?

Correct, I meant Java7 (not Java8). On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 4:18:32 PM UTC+2, Matt Sicker wrote: > > I thought the problem was that it required Java 7, not 8. None of the > pax-logging dependencies require Java 8. > > On 6 September 2016 at 09:16, Jean-Baptiste On

[ANN] OPS4J Pax Logging 1.8.6 Released

Hi, The Pax Logging team is happy to announce the release of *OPS4J Pax Logging 1.8.6*. This is a minor release with couple of bug fixes. See announce for details: https://ops4j1.jira.com/wiki/display/paxlogging/2016/09/06/Pax+Logging+1.8.6+Released Enjoy. Pax Logging Team -- --

Re: Pax Logging release?

t;>>>> >>>>> On 6 June 2016 at 16:52, <ra...@evosent.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> The OSGi import issues following the Logback 1.1.7 upgrades are now >>>>>> fixed. So please stick with Logback 1.1.7 for the 1.8.6 release

Re: Pax Logging release?

running pax-logging-api 1.8.5 with > pax-logging-log4j2 with 1.8.1? > > Our OSGi import version ranges are pretty lax: [0.9.5,2.0.0). > > Cheers, > Raúl. > > On Tuesday, 6 September 2016 16:34:22 UTC+2, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >> >> Agree, but not on a minor relea

Re: Introduction and release of pax-jdbc

Hi Sascha welcome aboard ! Great to have you there ! One thing that I would like to do in Pax JDBC is to be compliant with blueprint (in addition of ConfigAdmin). Thanks to that we would be able to deal with "old" and "new" style datasource service in Karaf. Another thing I saw is the

Re: ETA for next Pax-Exam maintenance release?

+1 I can cut off the release. Let me know. Regards JB On Thursday, October 13, 2016 at 4:37:29 PM UTC+2, Stuart McCulloch wrote: > > Hi folks, > > Just wondering if there are any plans for a Pax-Exam (4.9.2) maintenance > release? > > I’d like to consume a new feature I added recently: >

Re: [pax-exam] move to pax-exam 5?

+1 Regards JB On 07/12/2017 10:24 AM, 'Christoph Läubrich' via OPS4J wrote: Hi, I'd like to clean up the the Container API (see PAXEXAM-822 and linked ones), simplyfy and unify the creation of OSGi-Container (like native, karaf, forked) as well as adding a new Eclipse-Platform Container

Re: [pax-logging] Is it OK to integrate BSD licensed bwaldvogel/log4j-systemd-journal-appender into pax logging?

Hi BSD is a cat B but not cat X so yes it's possible. No worries. Regards JB On Jul 27, 2017, 19:16, at 19:16, Michael Vorburger wrote: >Hello Paxifians, > >For https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-5275 for >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475951, a

Re: [pax-logging] Is it OK to integrate BSD licensed bwaldvogel/log4j-systemd-journal-appender into pax logging?

see e.g. the JSON licence. Regards, Stephen On Thu, 27 Jul 2017 19:27:00 +0200, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jeanbaptiste.ono...@gmail.com <mailto:jeanbaptiste.ono...@gmail.com>> wrote: > Hi > > BSD is a cat B but not cat X so yes it's possible. N

Re: [REGISTER] Joining ops4j1.jira.com and discussing feature request

Hi, Did you already request an id on Jira ? Regards JB On 06/20/2017 11:50 AM, Lukasz Lech wrote: Hello, I’d like to join https://ops4j1.jira.com and as the message states, I need to apply here to register. The background is the problem with pax-web behavior

Re: [REGISTER] Joining ops4j1.jira.com and discussing feature request

disabled. Sorry for the inconvenience. Contact the OPS4J General list to have an account created. *From:*ops4j@googlegroups.com [mailto:ops4j@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Jean-Baptiste Onofré *Sent:* Dienstag, 20. Juni 2017 11:56 *To:* ops4j@googlegroups.com *Subject:* Re: [REGISTER] Joining

Re: [proposal] pax-web 6.0.4 release

+1 Regards JB On 05/25/2017 08:37 AM, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: Hello I'm going to release pax-web 6.0.4 with important fixes related to undertow and "default servlets". If there are no pending fixes that you're going to push, I'll release today ~12PM CEST. regards Grzegorz Grzybek -- --

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Pax-Logging 1.10.0

Thanks Guillaume ! Regards JB On 05/02/2017 11:18 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: Yeah, I forgot about that one. I'll do the release asap. 2017-05-02 10:44 GMT+02:00 Danesh Kuruppu >: Hi Guillaume, Just need to know the status of the

Re: pax-web-6.0.5 release?

Hi Grzegorz Can you wait up to tonight or tomorrow morning ? I have an investigation in progress. Thanks ! Regards JB On 06/06/2017 01:54 PM, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: Hello If you don't mind. I'd like to release pax-web-6.0.5 with some recent fixes: * 59dca84 - [PAXWEB-1099] Allow to

Re: [PAX-JDBC][1.2.0] pooling properties not forwarded to pool impl.

Hi it sounds like a bug, can you create a Jira about that ? Thanks, Regards JB On 09/19/2017 11:03 AM, Maurice Betzel wrote: Dear community, i am trying to setup a database connection pool for Oracle using the ojdbc8 12.2.0.1 Driver, but if i add: | jdbc.pool.maxTotal=16 | i get a

Re: [PAX-JDBC][1.2.0] pooling properties not forwarded to pool impl.

help here? Am Dienstag, 19. September 2017 11:13:18 UTC+2 schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré: Hi it sounds like a bug, can you create a Jira about that ? Thanks, Regards JB On 09/19/2017 11:03 AM, Maurice Betzel wrote: Dear community, i am trying to setup a database

Re: Pax-Exam: Karaf has problems viewing it

Hi Martin, what's the Pax Exam version and Karaf version ? Regards JB On 10/04/2017 11:56 PM, Martin Lichtin wrote: 418 | Active   |  80 | | PAXEXAM-PROBE-a6137ef4-da57-4b2b-b82a-b3bbc84d7bd3 karaf@root()> headers 418 Bundle 418 -- Error executing

Re: TinyBundles: release 3.0.0?

+1 Regards JB On 10/12/2017 02:18 PM, Christian Schneider wrote: I found that TinyBundles on master already supports my main requirements: - Uses the new bndlib 3.4.0 - Supports DS annotations Can we do a release of it? As I got a new laptop I am not yet prepared to do the release myself can

Re: pax-logging mysterious blocks in karaf (4.1.0)

Hi, I would suggest to report the issue in the Karaf Jira. Regards JB On 09/07/2017 10:49 AM, Lukasz Lech wrote: Hello! I’ve managed to identify the problem nearer. The FileOutputStream apparently was attempting to write onto Karaf console, because after pressing Ctrl+C in the console,

Re: Preparing pax-web-6.0.7 release

+1 Regards JB On Aug 24, 2017, 11:07, at 11:07, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: >Hello > >I'd like to release 6.0.7 of pax-web - with fixes to: > – PAXWEB-1117 – Race condition when registering servlets and so forth > – PAXWEB-1118 – Missing dependency (jetty-deploy bundle) in

Re: OPS4J Pax URL, find what maven repository has an artifact?

Hi, it's already what I replied on the Karaf mailing list. AFAIR, Steinar wants to avoid bundle:update: he wants an auto-update (and bundle:watch can only update from the local repository). Regards JB On 09/04/2017 05:59 PM, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: Hello What you described is implemented

Re: [pax-web][proposal] Reorganization of branches

Hi It sounds good to me. Regards JB On Sep 4, 2017, 14:03, at 14:03, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: >Hello > >I'm almost done with PAXWEB-1103 (XML configuration for Undertow) and >it >looks like this can no longer be considered a micro change. > >I wanted to ask you if we can

Re: Pax-Exam: Getting exit code for remote TestContainer

Yup, it makes sense to add "easy" exit code for the process. Regards JB On 10/11/2017 05:14 PM, Christian Schneider wrote: I found a hacky way to get the exit code. See https://gist.github.com/cschneider/5bb61baa032e16c4492e5c6235648de7 It would be great if we the TestContainer could return

Re: Pax Exam 4.12.0 release?

Hi Christoph, I think we are almost good for 4.12.0 release. Regards JB On 11/24/2017 10:00 AM, 'Christoph Läubrich' via OPS4J wrote: Hi, I'd like to know what is left fro the 4.12.0 relase? I created a pull-request[1] for the Eclipse-Container feature (merged from the current 5.x

Re: Want to report and fix an PAX-Logging issue from 1.9.x, need an access account, Thanks!

Hi Can you provide some details ? Did you already create a Jira account request ? Thanks Regards JB On Oct 31, 2017, 03:12, at 03:12, xilai...@gmail.com wrote: >Hi > >Want to report and fix an PAX-Logging issue from 1.9.x, need an access >account, Thanks! > >-- >-- >-- >OPS4J

Re: Making extenders subsystem-aware

Agree with Christoph. I would also recommend to take a look on subsystem and region. Regards JB Le 23 mai 2018 à 12:07, à 12:07, "'Christoph Läubrich' via OPS4J" a écrit: >I would consider using the systembundles bundle context is bad style! >This would break instantly

Re: ops4j jenkins down?

Hi Stephan, AFAIR, we are using circleci now (at least for Pax Web): https://circleci.com/gh/ops4j Let me check if Jenkins is still used. Regards JB On 25/05/2018 07:49, Stephan Siano wrote: > Hi, > > Is it possible that the ops4j jenkins ci.ops4j.org is down? I get a > connection timeout if

Re: Pax Exam 4.12 release

No yet, but no objection from my side. Regards JB On 02/12/2018 11:57 PM, Oliver Lietz wrote: > hi all, > > are there any release plans for Pax Exam 4.12? > > Thanks, > O. > -- -- -- OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com --- You received this message

Re: PAX Exam OSGI Components

Not sure I understand what you mean. If you use Karaf pax exam container it's as when you are a vanilla Karaf. Regards JB Le 20 févr. 2018 à 12:00, à 12:00, nino martinez wael a écrit: >Hi > >Are there anyway to get declarative services components? Both the

Re: [PAX-EXAM] No runnable methods

Hi Lukasz, The boot features are installed in the early stage of the Karaf bootstrap. That's why we have to add in the cfg file. You can install a feature with the provided features just after the bootstrap (in @before as you did). So, what's exactly your request ? CoreOptions.featureInstall()

Re: [PAX-EXAM] No runnable methods

me to initialize… Is there any reliable > mechanism to wait for all bundles to start in pax-exam test? > >   > > Best regards, > > Lukasz Lech > >   > > *From:*ops4j@googlegroups.com [mailto:ops4j@googlegroups.com] *On > Behalf Of *Jean-Baptiste Onofré > *Sent:

Re: [PAX-EXAM] No runnable methods

;>>> > From: ops4j@googlegroups.com [mailto:ops4j@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of > Lukasz Lech > Sent: Freitag, 3. August 2018 15:53 > To: ops4j@googlegroups.com > Subject: RE: [PAX-EXAM] No runnable methods > > Great, Thanks. > > waitForService() together wit

Re: Pax JDBC data sources are missing and never get resolved in a Karaf active/active configuration

Hi, Cellar syncs the bundles and config on the cluster. By default, it doesn't sync "local" config (basically the etc/*.cfg files). To do so, you have to enable the local listener in etc/org.apache.karaf.cellar.groups.cfg. Else, you have to use cluster:config-property-set to create the config

Re: Pax JDBC data sources are missing and never get resolved in a Karaf active/active configuration

node 2's log.  As soon as I bring down node 1, then I see the data > sources on node 2 initialize. > > Could this have anything to do with ActiveMQ master/slave? That's the only > constant here. It seems unlikely, but I'm out of ideas. > > > > On Thursday, March 8, 2018

Re: Karaf 4.2.0 / pax-jdbc 1.2.1

Hi Lukasz I have a series of update for 4.2.1. pax jdbc will be part of this. In the mean time, updating etc/org.apache.karaf.features.repos.cfg should do the trick. Regards JB Le 23 avr. 2018 à 14:29, à 14:29, Lukasz Lech a écrit: >Hello, > >I've tested Karaf 4.2.0 only

[PAX WEB] Release Pax Web 7.0.0 this morning

Hi guys, I plan to release Pax Web 7.0.0 this morning (I'm fixing the Jetty 9.4.x update on master right now). If you have any objection, please let me know. Thanks, Regards JB -- -- -- OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com --- You received this message

Re: [PAX WEB] Update master to 8.0.0-SNAPSHOT and create 7.0.x branch

him Nierbeck: > > Fine with me. > > regards, Achim > > 2018-02-05 7:58 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré > <jeanbapti...@gmail.com>: > > Hi guys, > > In order to upgrade to Jetty 9.4.x without bringing OSGi R7 on the >

Re: Release Pax Exam 4.13/5.0

here perhaps areas I could > assist (e.g. testing)? > > Best regards, > > Arnoud. > > On Tuesday, October 9, 2018 at 1:17:01 PM UTC+2, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > > Hi Oli, > > Yes, as I'm working on JUnit 5 update (Pax Exampl 5.0) and Java 11 >

Re: [PAX-WEB] Plan to release pax web 7.2.4 soon and idea for 7.3.x

Hi, 7.3.0 is fine. I'm also working on a branch from master (8.0.0) to have new R7 features supported. Regards JB On 02/11/2018 15:36, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: > Hello > > There are several fixes in pax-web 7.2.x branch: > > * [PAXWEB-1184] Upgrade to Karaf 4.2.1 > * [PAXWEB-1158][PAXWEB-1183]

Re: Listener elements are not deregistered

Thanks for the report. Let me check. Regards JB Le jeu. 15 nov. 2018 à 11:13, Janos Csikos a écrit : > Hi, > > Pax ver: 7.2.3 > Karaf ver: 4.2.1 > > Description: > I'm going to register an event listener, a HttpSessionListener in my > bundle. On e.g., bundle restarts the listeners are not

Re: Release Pax Exam 4.13/5.0

Hi Oli, Yes, as I'm working on JUnit 5 update (Pax Exampl 5.0) and Java 11 support/improvements (ASM, XBean, ... for both Pax Exam 4.x and 5.x). Regards JB On 09/10/2018 13:08, Oliver Lietz wrote: > Hi *, > > is anyone planning a release of Pax Exam for the near future? > > Thanks, > O. > --

Re: [PAX WICKET] 5.0.0.RC1

+1 It sounds good to bump the version. Regards JB On 21/09/2018 07:37, 'Christoph Läubrich' via OPS4J wrote: > Yes thats a good idea. > > Am 21.09.18 um 06:39 schrieb nino martinez wael: >> Hi Guys >> >> Wicket 8.1 have been released, and the current feature for PAX Wicket >> 5.0.0.RC1 WICKET

Re: PAX-JDBC Error during pax-jdbc-config bundle deactivation

+1 for the release Regards JB Le 26 sept. 2018 à 03:46, à 03:46, Grzegorz Grzybek a écrit: >Hello > >https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXJDBC-133 is fixed now. I'd like to >cut a >release of pax-jdbc 1.3.1 this week - there are no more unresolved >PAXJDBC >issues. Anything more before I start

Re: PaxWeb: Jetty and GZipHandler

Hello > > There are 40 unresolved issues in > https://ops4j1.jira.com/projects/PAXWEB/summary/statistics > - I didn't see any about gzip. > Could you refresh my memory? :) > > regards > Grzegor

Re: PaxWeb: Jetty and GZipHandler

Not with recent 7.2.x version. I think it deserves a unit test ;) Regards JB On 16/01/2019 14:20, Jérémie Brébec wrote: > Hello, > > I reopen this old thread, but has anyone a working example of a > GzipHandler with PaxWeb (7.2.5) ? > > Thanks ! > > Le mercredi 30 août 2017 06:20:23 UTC+2,

Re: [PAX-EXAM] Issue with KarafManipulatorFactory and custom Karaf package version

Hi Martin It makes sense IMHO. Can you please create a Jira about that, I will improve the versioning management. Thanks, Regards JB On 10/12/2018 13:04, Martin Lichtin wrote: > I'd like to to use Pax-Exam with a custom-built Karaf that uses a > custom versioning. > Problem is with this code

Re: [PAX-EXAM] Issue with KarafManipulatorFactory and custom Karaf package version

Thanks Martin. Regards JB On 10/12/2018 17:14, Martin Lichtin wrote: > Sounds great. https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXEXAM-924 > > On Monday, December 10, 2018 at 1:33:02 PM UTC+1, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > > Hi Martin > > It makes sense IMHO. Can you pl

Re: [PAX-WEB] pax-web-jsp with vulnerable taglibs library

Thanks for the Jira. I will also take a look later today. Regards JB Le mar. 27 nov. 2018 à 09:09, Grzegorz Grzybek a écrit : > Hello > > I've created https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXWEB-1188 to track this and > assigned to me. I'll try to look at it soon. > > regards > Grzegorz Grzybek > >

Re: PaxLogging and Structured logs

external logging system. > > Le jeudi 10 janvier 2019 13:48:23 UTC+1, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit : > > Hi Jérémis, > > You mean without marshalling to a "flat" log event ? > > Regards > JB > > On 10/01/2019 13:44, Jérémie Brébec wrote:

Re: PaxLogging and Structured logs

Hi Jérémis, You mean without marshalling to a "flat" log event ? Regards JB On 10/01/2019 13:44, Jérémie Brébec wrote: > Hello, > > I try to use a log4j2 logger to log some structured logs (like > instances of MapMessage). However, my message is lost and the > appenders receive instances of

Re: PAX URL 2.6.0 - plan to release

+1 Thanks ! Regards JB On 07/01/2019 11:08, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: > Hello > > There are 7 fixed issues, planned currently for version 2.6.0[1]. As > usual, most of the issues are related to Maven. > I bumped minor version (2.5 → 2.6) because I've successfully replaced > Eclipse Aether with new

Re: [PAX-LOGGING] Cleanup

Hi, it sounds good to me. For the dependencies, don't forget to update the OSGi headers in pax-logging-service. Regards JB On 18/04/2019 07:54, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: > Hello > > I have few issues backlogged for PAXLOGGING Jira: >  – PAXLOGGING-243: Incorrect bundle names in the logs in case

Re: [PAX-LOGGING] New integration tests

Awesome ! Thanks ! I will take a look during the weekend. Cheers JB On 16/05/2019 17:39, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: > Hello! > > Even more integration tests (including Logback) - I finally created > the tests I always wanted - that restart/refresh pax-logging bundles > inside the test itself! > >

Re: [PAX-LOGGING] Releasing 1.11.0 soon?

Hi, +1 for 1.11.0, I will test on karaf-4.2.x branch (maybe 1.10.2 to cherry-pick PAXLOGGING-257 is also an option). Definitely, I would like to update master to 2.0.0 version with OSGi R7 support (PAXLOGGING-255 I started during the week end). Regards JB On 03/06/2019 12:08, Grzegorz Grzybek

Re: Does pax-jms degrade the overall performance?

wo connections per instance, in this case? I have > to verify this thing with my previous implementation (while deploying > broker as an artifact). > > Regards, > Cooshal. > > On Tuesday, June 18, 2019 at 3:45:41 PM UTC+2, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > >

Re: Does pax-jms degrade the overall performance?

mponent.jms.JmsComponent"> >         ref="jmsConsumerConnectionFactory"/> >     >      >     class="org.apache.camel.component.jms.JmsComponent"> >         ref="jmsProducerConnectionFactory"/> >     > > On Tuesday, June 18, 2019 at 3:59:28 PM UTC+2,

Re: PAX WEB: Websocket annotations working?

Hi, AFAIR, it's not yet fully supported. But easy to add/fix, I will tackle that. Regards JB On 25/06/2019 15:25, Stephan Siano wrote: > Hi, > > I have a question concerning web sockets in Pax-Web: > > A colleague of mine is trying to deploy a war on a Pax-Web container > that contains some

Re: PAX WEB: Websocket annotations working?

his should work > via servletContext.getAttribute("javax.websocket.server.ServerContainer");). > There is probably all the websocket infrastructure missing in the > Pax-Web classes. > > Best regards > Stephan > > On Tuesday, June 25, 2019 at 3:40:22 PM UTC+2, Jean-Baptiste Onofré

Re: Pax Exam 4.12.0 release?

Hi Jürgen, I will check the status and eventually cut the release. I keep you posted. Regards JB On 20/06/2019 10:48, Jürgen Schmid wrote: > Hi laeubi, > > just wanted to check the current release status. > Unfortunately the ops4j Repositories were shut down >

Re: Pax Exam 4.12.0 release?

prior? > > thanks, Achim > > > Am Do., 20. Juni 2019 um 10:48 Uhr schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré > mailto:jeanbaptiste.ono...@gmail.com>>: > > Hi Jürgen, > > I will check the status and eventually cut the release. > > I keep you posted. > >

Re: Problems running pax exam with openjdk-11

You can't use Felix framework 6 as it's OSGi R7. I will take a look on your branch. I can confirm that karaf itests, including pax jdbc work in itest. Regards JB Le sam. 15 juin 2019 à 13:52, Steinar Bang a écrit : > I've pushed my current jdk11/pax exam experiments to this branch >

Re: Does pax-jms degrade the overall performance?

Hi, That's the way JMS works. You create a ConnectionFactory. The connection factory provides connections. A connection provides several sessions. A session is single threaded, and "assigned" to an action (consume or produce). So, inside a single connection (for one client), you can have bunch

Re: bundle not resolved due to pax-jdbc while provisioning in karaf

e: javax.sql.DataSource;multiple:=false;filter=(osgi.jndi >  .service.name > <http://service.name>=dw-datasource),org.apache.karaf.cellar.core.ClusterM >  anager;multiple:=false,org.osgi.service.cm.ConfigurationAdmin;multipl >  e:=false > Require-Capability: osgi.ee <htt

Re: Pax-exam with java11+ for karaf4

:11 UTC+1, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >> >> I will take a look but probably the launcher to update. >> >> Le dim. 21 avr. 2019 à 11:39, Gareth Healy a >> écrit : >> >>> I am trying to get pax-exam testing karaf4 on java11 but looking at the >

Re: [PAX-LOGGING] Cleanup

Thanks, let me take a look. Regards JB On 19/04/2019 13:37, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: > Hello > > Here's new readme.adoc I prepared for pax-logging (probably a good > candidate for PAXLOGGING wiki): > > = PAX-LOGGING > > The goal of this project is to allow users and bundles to use well >

Re: PAX WEB: Websocket annotations working?

i, > > when I first started to look into websockets, there needed to be > extra Bundles installed for Jetty. > That's about 4 to 5 years ago :) > But I haven't looked into the annotations, as far as I can remember. > > Regards, Achim > > > A

Re: PAX WEB: Websocket annotations working?

ow). > > Shall I create a JITA task for the undertow container (though I will > not be able to actually fix the issue there)? > > Best regards > Stephan > > Am Montag, 1. Juli 2019 20:33:58 UTC+2 schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré: > > Thanks Stephan > > I will

Re: Pax-exam with java11+ for karaf4

I will take a look but probably the launcher to update. Le dim. 21 avr. 2019 à 11:39, Gareth Healy a écrit : > I am trying to get pax-exam testing karaf4 on java11 but looking at the > logs, doesn't really tell me anything. It just seems "stuck". > > JUnit logs: >

Re: PAX WEB: Websocket annotations working?

ause while the change makes the websocket test run on > tomcat it has side effects on other tests (without websockets). > > Am Mittwoch, 26. Juni 2019 13:25:01 UTC+2 schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré: >> >> +1 to reuse PAXWEB-1027, and happy to work with you on this one ;) >>

Re: pax-web-extender-whiteboard Servlet filters ordering

Hi Did you try with pax web 4.3.x ? Regards JB Le lun. 12 août 2019 à 17:33, Nhut Thai Le a écrit : > Hello, > > I am using paxweb 7.2.4 and I have 4 servlet filters, annotated with > service.ranking from 0 -> 3, according to the osgi cmpn 6/7, the filter > with higher rank will be executed

Re: pax-web-extender-whiteboard Servlet filters ordering

Hi, Sorry, I meant 7.3.x ;) Regards JB On 12/08/2019 20:25, Nhut Thai Le wrote: > Hi JB, > > I haven't tried 4.3.x, but mine is 7.2.4 and it is much latter. Can > you elaborate why i should try an older version? > > Thai > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 1:48

Re: [PAX-WEB] next 7.2.x release soon?

Hi Yes, it's plan to cut a release this week. Regards JB Le lun. 19 août 2019 à 12:40, Jens Kordowski a écrit : > Hi, > > I was wondering when there will be a new 7.2.x release of pax web. Any > plans? > > Best regards > Jens > > -- > -- > -- > OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org -

Re: [PAX-WEB] next 7.2.x release soon?

; > On Monday, August 19, 2019 at 11:59:53 AM UTC+1, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> Yes, it's plan to cut a release this week. >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> Le lun. 19 août 2019 à 12:40, Jens Kordowski a >> écrit : >>

Re: PAXWEB 7.3.x - release?

+1, go for it I will deal with 7.2.11 release. Thanks Regards JB Le ven. 13 sept. 2019 à 03:59, Grzegorz Grzybek a écrit : > Hello > > I'm planning to release pax web 7.3.4 with recent fixes and dependency > upgrades. > > Please mind, that this is *not* a version to be used in upcoming Karaf

Re: [PAX-WEB] next 7.2.x release soon?

Yeah, I'm fixing the latest itests issues and we are good to go. The release will happen very soon. Regards JB Le jeu. 12 sept. 2019 à 08:08, DEREK MCKEOWN a écrit : > Hi, > > Any updates on this? > > Regards > Derek > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 29 Aug 2019,

Re: Servlet Filters registered, activated but not processing request

Hi As said, I did a fix on pax web 7.2.10 about twice service registration. It might help. Regards JB Le sam. 14 sept. 2019 à 19:41, Nhut Thai Le a écrit : > We recently upgrade to pax-web 7.2.10 and i haven't seen this happen again > yet. Even with 7.2.4 it only happened a few times, I'll

Re: filter.init in pax-web-extender-whiteboard 7.2.4 does not populate FilterConfig object

Hi, I'm already working on Pax Web currently (starting R7 support), I will take a look on this one as well. Regards JB On 31/07/2019 06:44, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: > Hello > > This could be a bug. > There are two more issues related to incorrect implementation of R6 > Whiteboard: >  -

Re: [PAX-EXAM] Release 4.13.2?

Hi I will. Thanks. Regards JB Le lun. 15 juil. 2019 à 09:56, Arnoud Glimmerveen < arnoudglimmerv...@gmail.com> a écrit : > Hi all, > > There is a relatively minor change already merged in the 4.x branch that > enables Pax Exam to 'play nice' with more recent versions of compendium > services

Re: Releasing pax-jdbc and pax-jms (problem at Sonatype)

Thanks I already sent an email about that. It should be on the way. I have some pax releases on the way. Regards JB Le jeu. 18 juil. 2019 à 08:19, Grzegorz Grzybek a écrit : > Hello > > I created https://issues.sonatype.org/browse/OSSRH-50164 to track the > problem with the release of

Re: [PAX-LOGGING] Releasing 1.11.0 soon?

Hey I'm working on it. I will cut 1.10.2 tomorrow and then I will move forward on 1.11.0 just after. Regards JB Le mar. 23 juil. 2019 à 20:12, Markus Rathgeb a écrit : > Definitely, I would like to update master to 2.0.0 version with OSGi R7 >> support (PAXLOGGING-255 I started during the

Re: [PAXLOGGING] JDK 11 support

Sweet ! Thanks ! Regards JB Le mer. 24 juil. 2019 à 14:29, Grzegorz Grzybek a écrit : > Hello > > Just for your information - I fixed master and paxlogging-1.11.x so all > integration (native and Karaf) tests work under JDK8 and JDK11. > > best regards > Grzegorz Grzybek > > -- > -- >

Re: Pax Runner Issue with Java11

Hi Rome, For Pax Runner you are right (I don't have the issue in Pax Exam as we are using Karaf). I will create the Jira and fix that. Regards JB On 01/11/2019 19:39, Rome Agapkin wrote: > i have just checked the source code of the pax-runner-platform project > and see that there is no

Re: Derby is looking for assistance with OSGi compatibility

under required license? > > Am 18.10.19 um 06:16 schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré: >> Hi Mark, >> >> I will take a look on the Jira. As we are working on Pax JDBC, and Derby >> is used there (wrapped), we already have good OSGi support in Derby. >> >> Thanks for s

Re: Derby is looking for assistance with OSGi compatibility

Hi Mark, I will take a look on the Jira. As we are working on Pax JDBC, and Derby is used there (wrapped), we already have good OSGi support in Derby. Thanks for sharing, Regards JB On 17/10/2019 21:09, 'Mark Raynsford' via OPS4J wrote: > Hello! > > I recently posted to the Derby list because

Re: Derby is looking for assistance with OSGi compatibility

Nice ! Don't hesitate to ping if needed ! Regards JB On 18/10/2019 13:22, Mark Raynsford wrote: > On 2019-10-18T07:02:55 +0200 > 'Christoph Läubrich' via OPS4J wrote: > >> IMO instead of adding own support we better should convince open-source >> projects to add first-class support for

Re: Pax-Testing camel routes in Karaf with CamelTestSupport on recent versions

Hi Dietrich, Yeah, it's a pretty old blog post ;) I think it makes sense to add or extend the Karaf examples. I will do it. Thanks, Regards JB On 30/11/2019 10:25, Dietrich Schulten wrote: > Exactly. Those spring and activemq versions were a bit painful indeed :) > > Btw your old blog code is

Re: [snapshot] - Repository

Hi, Let me check. I keep you posted. Regards JB On 02/12/2019 11:01, françois papon wrote: Hi, The https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/ops4j-snapshots/ is not available. Is it normal? May be the repository have been moved? regards, * François* -- -- -- OPS4J -

Re: [snapshot] - Repository

? (like Travis). regards, *François Papon* *papon...@gmail.com <mailto:papon...@gmail.com>* Le lun. 2 déc. 2019 à 11:20, Jean-Baptiste Onofré mailto:jeanbaptiste.ono...@gmail.com>> a écrit : Hi, Let me check. I keep you posted. Regards JB On 02/1

Re: Pax-Testing camel routes in Karaf with CamelTestSupport on recent versions

Hi, CamelTestSupport is for utest whereas pax-exam is more for itest. You can take a look on some itest I did about Camel, for instance: https://github.com/apache/karaf-decanter/pull/111/files#diff-f23addf50c34ea79c8df17bb2861d649 So, you should *NOT* use CamelTestSupport for itest (and keep

Re: Pax-Testing camel routes in Karaf with CamelTestSupport on recent versions

looks most promising. > I'll try to update my clone of your older tutorial accordingly. > > Best, > Dietrich > > > Am Freitag, 29. November 2019 10:02:38 UTC+1 schrieb Jean-Baptiste > Onofré: > > Hi, > > CamelTestSupport is for utest whereas pax-exam is mo

Re: Maven Aether configuration

Hi Sorry I jump late on this thread. I don’t have any problem in Karaf (we have bunch of tests running daily without problem). I guess you are on Windows platform right ? Which jdk version ? Anything special about network (like a proxy to access Internet) ? Regards JB Le mer. 4 mars 2020 à

Re: Maven Aether configuration

Why not simply update the pax url cfg file in the pax exam config ? Regards JB Le jeu. 5 mars 2020 à 20:01, Jared Whiklo a écrit : > Thank you Grzegorz, > > Here is the test currently > > >

Re: Maven Aether configuration

is? > > I am really quite a novice at Pax Exam stuff. > > cheers, > jared > > On 2020-03-05 1:32 p.m., Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Why not simply update the pax url cfg file in the pax exam config ? > > > > Regards > > JB > > > > L

Re: [PAX WEB] Url Pattern is auto-generated from Alias and how to register exact url pattern

Hi Grzegorz, Let's sync together about action plan as I started some changes as well. Regards JB On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 12:48 PM Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: > Hello > > Yes - this is all confusing... I'm just in the process of reviewing master > branch (pax web 8.0.0-SNAPSHOT) to check R7 (and

  1   2   >