You tell 'em Bob!
Collin (having lived in Wisconsin, Nebraska, Oklahoma, but now in Ohio!)
At 01:29 AM 8/8/2003 -0400, you wrote:
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 20:35:08 EDT
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You guys are forgetting about the Great Plains, the breadbasket of the USA.
Stretching west from Chicago
Mark Erickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I refer again to the retrofocus designs of very short focal
length lenses (like the Pentax 15mm F3.5).
In Pentax K mount, any lens with a focal length shorter than about
45.5mm has to be a retrofocus design.
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
Actually, Michigan trailer (Mobile Home) parks are a little different than
in most states. Any park built since 1976 has to meet very stringent
regulations. Mobile Homes built since then have to past inspections and
quality regulations that are stricter than those for stick built homes. Yes
there
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, Rob,
Haller had it in his initial post of what has now become a thread to be proud
of...
vbg
cheers,
frank
Rob Studdert wrote:
One photographers fav that seems to have been missed thus far;
The technicolor yawn :-P
Here's one specific (I
I've just spent two days cleaning msblaster out and reinstalling XP in a
friends PC. He has an ADSL connection and the damned msblaster/lovesan got
in. I got the patch, removed the worm and in about one minute it was back
in. I unplugged the ADSL line and patched Windows. Used the Symantec cleaner
Hi all,
just got a quote from my local dealer here -- *ist-D plus the 16-35 FAJ
lens for 2000 retail (that includes a 21% sales tax if you want
to work it back to dollars)
For comparison the Canon 10D sells for 2200 body only. They have a
couple of *ist-Ds on order, delivery in
-Original Message-
From: Rob Brigham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I only have limited experience, but have found that the difference
between USB 1.1 and USB 2 card readers is negligible. The
read speed of
the card/reader seems to be the limiting factor here.
I have found a huge
1. Why? Wide DA lenses are necessary IMO for *istD. Full frame cameras don't
really need 16-45mm zooms.
2. Not really; you can use all the full-frame lenses on the *istD. And I
guess that, in this case, you will need only wide angle DA lenses?
3. Why? because they finally can buy a Pentax DSLR
Hi,
Thursday, August 14, 2003, 12:54:09 AM, you wrote:
In today's environment, if you are
running XP and you're not checking for updates on a daily basis, you got
rocks in your head!
probably the overwhelming majority of people running Windows are
ordinary, non-geeky types who haven't a
http://www.datarescue.com/photorescue/
--
Thomas Van Veen Photography
www.bigdayphoto.com
301-758-3085
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 11:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Nikon help - apologies for OT
T Rittenhouse wrote:
There is no doubt that digital is currently a fad, especially at the
comsumer level.
This is _certainly_ not fad quality!
http://www.canon.co.jp/Imaging/EOS10D/html/EOS10D_sample_1e.html
We're not talking point-and-shoots here. This is serious stuff. And,
hardly a
Pardon my eariler post. I forgot that 1Mb
is not really 1 million bytes, I believe
its actually 1.024 million bytes or something
similar so if you have 6 million actual pixels
then you have 18 million actual bytes which
is LESS than 18Mb.
JCO
I had fun putting three rolls through my new Super Program this weekend
and trying out my new monopod. :)
I've been shooting a lot. Fifteen rolls of film last weekend, another
three this weekend. I have a lot of scanning and printing to do. Paul
AVG is an antivirus program. There is a free version, updates seem to lag
about a week behind the paid for version. Should be a notice that this email
was scanned with it at the bottom of this message.
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From:
Sorry, Rob,
Haller had it in his initial post of what has now become a thread to be proud
of...
vbg
cheers,
frank
Rob Studdert wrote:
One photographers fav that seems to have been missed thus far;
The technicolor yawn :-P
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)
At 09:29 PM 8/12/2003 -0400, you wrote:
Uh, Mark, would you care to share???
JCO has been making a lot of sense to me lately. Though with an investment
in a *ist-D coming up, it will be a while before I jump into another platform.
- MCC
-Original Message-
From: Mark Cassino
Possibly after this weekend. I didn't get to spend a whole lot of time
with it yesterday, but hope to get to spend some time with it this
evening and tomorrow morning.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: Sylwester Pietrzyk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 6:01 AM
Clive, try Asahi Photo based in London.
http://www.asahiphoto.net/
telephone 0208 908 2931
I once spoke to a real nice bloke and asked if they could spare a LX
strap-mounting point sop I could make a Grip with a mount on. I sent them
£5 and they sent me one from a dead LX. I think they must
- Original Message -
From: T Rittenhouse
Subject: Re: *ist D figures
IIRC Pentax out sold (units) all other SLR makers in the late 60's early
70's. Then the plastic cameras came out and Pentax was late getting into
that (cheap camera) market.
It was autofocus that killed Pentax
- Original Message -
From: Antti-Pekka Virjonen
Subject: Re: Re: Puking Euphemisms (WAS: please comment)
At 16:05 14.8.2003 +0300, you wrote:
On Friday last there was one (Moose) lurking around our garden. It stayed
for several hours.
I believe the real hirvi (the big one) in
So far, with macro, I agree with you.
As a matter of fact, I prefer the older
Pentax tubes without diaphragm coupling.
You don't have to keep mashing the DOF
preview knob, and they give DOF preview
to cameras that don't have the knob.
Mind, I rarely take moving critter shots
in macro.
Sometimes
Dan Scott-
As an aside, it's good to see you back. You were gone
for a while. The humor on this list is going to crank
up a desirable notch or too with your return.
-Lon
Dan Scott wrote:
. some inane tripe .. vbg..
Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 13.08.03 18:11, Mark Roberts at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a 400FTZ, and I do use it on both the PZ-1p and the MZ-S. Works
very well but flash compensation is a pain on the MZ-S.
The only way to make flash h to M moe and make exposure
on 14.08.03 2:46, Bill Owens at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The *ist D that is. Our local Pentax rep gave me a call on his way to
GFM via Hickory and asked if I wanted to fondle an *ist D. About 20
minutes later I had one in my grubby little paws. I only had a 16 MB CF
card with me, but here
No, no no no how about the bicycle riding the goat?
Steve Larson wrote:
Now if you got a pic of that goat riding the bicycle.
Steve Larson
While we at it, anyone know of a good place to rebuild LX motor drive NiCad
packs [I have one on my MX motor].
Good to see Pentax USA keeping up old traditions. Nicad Services in Poole.
About £55 from what I remember.
At one time Henry's (Canuck ebay photodealer) had a bunch of LX winder
I finally got the replacement lens, and this one was assembled
correctly so that the tulip hood is properly oriented on the lens
when mounted.
When I called BH to check on the exchange, I asked if they had
checked out the replacement lens to make sure this wasn't a problem
that was on perhaps
On Wednesday, August 13, 2003, at 09:32 AM, arathi-sridhar wrote:
thanks Dan for taking time to analyze and comment at such length.
I felt that the 'other' shot (without the goat) was perhaps static, but
you have rightly pointed out why it is the more interesting of the 2.
-Sridhar
You're quite
Could this term have something to do with the fact that some imaging
chips don't have rectilinear pixel arrangement, like the Fujifilm S2
Pro, which has a hex layout. The effective is the number of pixels you
get after the camera has done it's RAW-TIFF conversion?
D
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
That is very good news. All of my lenses are K or M series.
Paul
Ryan Charron wrote:
Hi Everyone,
In the second paragraph of the *ist D preview
it states that it supports K KA KAF and KAF2 lenses.
Sorry I forgot to include the item # 2944424039
___
Dr E D F Williams
http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams
Author's Web Site and Photo Gallery
Updated: July 31, 2003
Very cool, Bob. Hope you got a few of her boats! I have to agree
with you on the Wow you get when you gaze at those big slides...
Tell us more about what you ended up getting.
Brother Bruce
Tuesday, August 5, 2003, 3:10:51 PM, you wrote:
Rac Yes, we are all out taking pictures!
Rac Tall
means you will be using your neutral density filters more often. i have a range from 3
stops to 10 stops.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Alan Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2003 17:57
Subject: Re: *ist-D official picture samples!
But
Hi Clive,
have a look at
http://www.pgallery.net/image-libraries.html
to see lots of pictures taken with various voigtlaender lenses, and with the
15mm, too.
I have a Bessa R and the pancake 35/2,5 (got on ebay for half the price of
new). I am quite satisfied but I like a ME or MEsuper with the
So do you think i may have been infected with something or is being booted
out
of a program and
having windows automatically restart itself a problem of another nature.
Now i'm worried.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
after reading Cotty's piece in The 37th frame (Mike Johnston's
newsletter)-- what more does one need to enable oneself?
[...]
So, while I suppose my travels will lead to Ebay, I hereby announce my
intention to buy an LX, and if any of you pdmlers have one for sale, I
am in the market.
All,
I think we've been over this before, but it's coming up again with the
impending release of the *ist-D, I guess. I've got two points to make:
First, the angle at which light hits the focal plane is more important for a
CCD array than for film. Why? The microlens array in front of the CCD!
Hi Richard,
on 08 Aug 03 you wrote in pentax.list:
Olympus' brochures claim that the film-camera-based
lenses would not provide good results with the CCD
sensor because the light rays, especially at the
edges, do not properly strike the sensor at an right
angle.
That's right. CCDs need parallel
Takes four AA batteries or two CR-V3 lithium-ion batteries
This will either quietly kill it off, or they will change it in Revision
B and include proprietary rechargeable battery packs. You heard it here
first.
Didn't someone, N***N perhaps, make a rechargeable version of the CR-V3?
Plus with
Try K or M lenses and give us the real scoop.
Steve Desjardins wrote:
I think Bill has left, but I'll be sure to try this with my 360FGZ set
to TTL. Assuming that I can pry this out of other hands.
There is a point to this, however. If any of you have *istD questions,
post them to this thread.
question:
The theme for the October PUG is professional. Anyone care to
elaborate on that? Does that mean I have to have sold the picture?
Or does it mean I can use a Canon . . . 8^O
Steve (who is raising shields. ..)
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Cotty wrote:
But still, again MHO would be that modern electronics are not built to
last, like for example M-series cameras last - seemingly forever... So
having to replace your DSLR camera body every 2-3 years seems like a
quite normal course of action.
Interesting. Of course, I have
Is this discussion list still up and running?
_
Receive your Hotmail Messenger messages on your mobile phone with MSN
Mobile http://www.msn.be/gsm/smsservices
I don't see the problem. As long as you are specifying bytes or bits it is
obvious. The only reason hard drive manufactures use a 1000 mutiplier is
because one of the earily ones started doing that, and the others clained
they had to follow suite or lose business because the comsumer thought their
Maybe your math is off? 6X7 at 4000ppi is approx
120MPixel so color would be ~360 Mp not
700Mp. Unless your using 48bit color,
but then the 4X5 scan would be 600Mpixel
at 48bits
For the same amount of pixels, the larger
format at lower scan resolution is going
to look better due to less film
On 10 Aug 2003 at 19:03, T Rittenhouse wrote:
I wonder why everybody thinks, I said that digital is not here to stay. If
you don't think digital cameras are a fad how do you explain the idea of a
digital disposable camera. Does it make any economic sense at all. Maybe in a
few years it will
Took the new Optio 550 to the zoo yesterday. Also the ZX-5n. So yes, I guess
it's fair to say I've been taking some pictures.
On 10 Aug 2003 at 5:19, Keith Whaley wrote:
You're right, of course, but for the average photographer, as most of
us are, being able to take 50+ flash-assisted photographs in one furious
session, and after that being able to take twice that many if you want
to...all on a single set of
on 08.08.03 8:10, zoomshot at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At last here it is http://www.dpreview.com/news/0308/03080802pentaxistd.asp
Noticeably smaller than competition and with bigger viewfinder. Really nice
:-)
--
Best Regards
Sylwek
I know I want to, too. But I want Pentax to assure me that my wife wont
be able to see the difference when I upgrade this first model to the
'pro' model next year - otherwise I could be in big trouble, or worse
still locked into the entry level model when I want the new one later.
You will start
Yes, the fabeled grip strap, new, with box, with a PZ-1p to go with it, excellent
condition and a Pentax-replaced NEW shutter that is operating totally like new. No
problems with this camera, except it's one too many for me these days. $400 includes
original box, manual, strap, body cap, new
I'll have a 40 M lens with me for this very purpose.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/14/03 01:48PM
Hi Steve,
on 14 Aug 03 you wrote in pentax.list:
I think Bill has left, but I'll be sure to try this with my 360FGZ
set
to TTL.
Great. Maybe you can find an AF500FTZ and try this, too.
There is a point
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sid Barras) wrote:
So, while I suppose my travels will lead to Ebay, I hereby announce my
intention to buy an LX, and if any of you pdmlers have one for sale, I
am in the market.
Damn. That makes two of us...
---
John Dallman
If you don't see any white residue (salt) on any surfaces, and
everything works right, then it's all OK.
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, is my stuff safe from salt corrosion or is there something more I
need to do?
Feroze, that may be system-dependent. WindowsXP recent burns to CD-R are
marked read-only, and are very resistant to deletion! I haven't yet tried
every technique, but I do tend now to ensure I have everything copied in one
go.
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
- Original Message -
From:
I'll certainly look into a slide scanner and take your words under advisement.
Many thanks for the insight, Mark.
I'll re-read this another time or two and start making decisions...
keith whaley
Mark Roberts wrote:
Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Time I got around to answering
OTOH, there is a custom function to use older lenses. Just what that means
is not explained.
In general it looks like a nice camera. No sample shots that I could find.
Oh well, we will get a hands on, hopefully, at GFM.
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original
Lon Williamson wrote:
a) The SP manual states that leaving the flash on,
in _any_ mode, keeps the SP's meter perpetually on.
Yet, with both my SPs and both my 280's, switching
the flash off causes the camera to lose flash synch
(125 will no longer display as the shutter speed, and
the lightning
Thank you, John. I needed the chuckle that produced.
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: John Mustarde [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2003 4:12 PM
Subject: Now We'll See
The ist-D will soon be on the store
It is the firm opinion of all PDML subscribers of taste
and restraint that Cotty should be whipped thoroughly.
Wet noodles at ten paces. Frank is first in line.
-Lon
frank theriault wrote:
Why would anyone want to kill you, Cotty? Just because you jumped ship,
scurried like a wet rat over to
Lon,
I'm on the other side of the issue. I put an extension tube on the 6x7ii and was
confused for a bit because of the auto tubes I used in 35mm. All the metering must be
done stopped down and exposures made the same way. It means I'll be using a tripod
for anything I do 6x7 macro.
I agree with William.
If you have an older computer, it helps to defrag first.
Don't run any other programs the first time you burn to CD-R,
and if it fails, adjust the write speed to a s_l_o_w_e_r
setting.
William Kane wrote:
Ann,
I don't have time to get too deep into this, but this will
- Original Message -
From: Lon Williamson
Subject: Re: Another *ist D Preview
William,
It seems the LXen aren't treating you well.
Have you considered switching to another body
as your go-to 35mm body?
Yup, Nikon makes a few nice ones.
William Robb
A friend installed it for me. It is there, I can
read stuff from the D; drive that used to be my E:
drive,
I can read Cd's inserted in the new CD-ROM drive.
But the software has me totally befuddled.
Friend who installed the drive left town
(literally) before we actually got to try ot burn
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003, [iso-8859-1] Pål Jensen wrote:
Well, if Pentax indeed market KAF3 with USM, and I think they wil
along with the pro DSLR, theres no reason really to keep the aperture
ring as such lenses won't make much sense on older cameras anyway. I
fear the aperture ring is on its way
It is the firm opinion of all PDML subscribers of taste
and restraint that Cotty should be whipped thoroughly.
Wet noodles at ten paces. Frank is first in line.
Ya have to catch me first 8-P
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
Step this way to the Canon and Nikon Counter, Sir.
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have decided to sell my Pentax MX, ME super and
lenses, 28mm f/2.8, 50mm f/1.7, 75-150 f/4 zoom.
Unless somebody can convince me it is a mistake.
Why am I selling? Quite simply I want several things
these cameras
Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just read Pop Photo's review of the new Hasselblad H1, the most
technologically advanced medium format SLR on the planet according to
the reviewers. Standard lens is a new 80 mm. f2.8 made by Fuji, but with
Hasselblad's name on it. But, hey, the
TXU - we're excited by gas and electricity.
Naw, fart with the lights off. You can get away with it easier.
Whoops.!
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Rubenstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2003 3:02 PM
Subject: Re: Scratch on the new 24mm lens.
I didn't know BH would exchange merchanise bought
Sure! That's the White Balance icon, Cory.
keith whaley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did we ever figure out what that symbol of the box on to top of two
triangles was?
I was drooling over the photos of the isdee and couldn't figure it our.
Cory Waters
You can indeed.
Ann, the GUI should be able to walk you through itself. As another message
indicated just open Nero and tell it to create a Data CD (as opposed to a
music CD). From there you may drag-and-drop, or double-click a folder or
file, or click a folder or file and click Add in the menu
Mark Roberts wrote:
Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Slides? Are you primarily a slide person? I guess I should pay more attention...
About 95% of what I shoot is slides.
If you are, we need to talk...
OK :)
Time I got around to answering this...
I used to love slides,
They probably just set the threshold for the slave high, so it wouldn't
be sensitive enough to be tripped by the pre-fire flashes (they are low
power flashes).
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I saw an advertisement for a flash that was primarily designed to augment
the flash on a point and shoot
Not to worry, Cotty, YOUR prayers came true! g
keith
Cotty wrote:
...or maybe they are all waiting silently for the *istD announcements on
friday...
Praying, more likely.
Cheers,
Cotty
Hi,
Thursday, August 7, 2003, 12:19:16 PM, you wrote:
Don't tell me he's sold out!
like most photojournalists these days he has always supported his real
work with commercial assignments. If it wasn't for the commercial
work we wouldn't have stuff like 'Workers' and 'Migrations'. According
to
Ya! That Old Wheatfield Willie guy is insane. HAR!
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 8:19 PM
Subject: Re: October PUG
- Original Message -
Hi all,
what do you think is the best portraitlens (with AF) for the ist-D?
Should i keep my Pentax-F 50mm 1:1.7 or should i go for the Pentax-FA
50mm 1:1.4?
I don't wanna use my 85mm lenses (FA and A) on the ist-D for Portraits
because you are too far away from the person (on 35mm i never use
On Sun, 10 Aug 2003 10:19:17 +0200, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
on 10.08.03 0:29, Leon Altoff at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the 500 works then the 400, 330 240 should as well. These would
not be listed as they are not current models.
Yes, but maybe AF500 is mentioned there because it will
OK, thank you. What about Sigma EX 2.8/70-200? Is it comparable to
Tokina 2.8/80-200? Tokina is hardly to find in Russia now... :-(
Sincerely yours,
Arthur D. Grokhovski
Sailing department editor
Power and Sail Boats
www.katera.ru
Russia
Mint example and more importantly its the A version so it will work on the
new *st and *stD.
www.keh.com and kevin cameras both list the older non A version at $850 so I
am asking $950US
thanks
wayne
SomeOne please give them a roll of Provia and scale it
to 6 mp after a good scan and say those were the digi
cam samples lol.
Something like these? :-)
Without ICE:
http://www3.telus.net/wlachan/b+w.jpg
With ICE:
http://www3.telus.net/wlachan/flower1.jpg
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
To damn picky if you ask me.Next time all MF stuff.lol
Dave
They are picky are they not!
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Got my portfolio back from Hallmark Cards
on the weekend.Its the one i sent
Hi list,
I've put a Wild stereoscope on eBay. I suppose I should have offered it here
first? Yes? No? It cost about $200 when I bought it. I don't make prints any
more so its superfluous to my requirements.
Don
___
Dr E D F Williams
http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams
Author's
on 13.08.03 18:11, Mark Roberts at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a 400FTZ, and I do use it on both the PZ-1p and the MZ-S. Works
very well but flash compensation is a pain on the MZ-S.
The only way to make flash h to M moe and make exposure compensation on the
camera - that's not very
For a CD to be able to be read by any other CD player, the CD has to be
made in disk at once (or what ever Nero calls it, you don't want
packet writting mode). The basic concept for doing what you want to do is:
create a data CD (should be a menu option)
then you drag the files you want copied
Kathleen a écrit:
I emailed Pentax regarding the *ist D, and here is their response. It
sounds like a really awesome camera.:
Thank you for contacting Pentax USA, Inc.
Patience soon will pay off for digital SLR enthusiasts when PENTAX USA
delivers the lens-interchangeable *ist D digital SLR
Oops. I didn't read your original post closely enough. I think you
would be find sticking with the 1.7. If you were deciding which to buy,
however, I think the 1.4 is worth the difference in cost.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
On Sat, 09 Aug 2003 20:31:56 +0200, Rolf Brenner wrote:
Hi all,
does anybody knows which Flashes i can use with the ist-D. Is it like
with Canon that i can only use Flashes with E-TTL in this case P-TTL
(that means only the 360FGZ) or can i use normal TTL (like the 500FTZ).
Rolf,
Every review
Hi!
Not exactly true. USB 2.0 interfaces are downwards compatible. So if
you
connect *istD to USB2.0 enabled PC it will work without any problems.
Personally I wouldn't bother with this. I would for sure buy external
reader
- much more convenient to use than connecting cable to camera every
Frank,
Normally, I am a silent member, however, I must express my thoughts here.
I am a software engineer in US here for last six years. Now while waiting
for final approval of my residency, lost job in last november and since
then have been waiting, struggling, praying to God for better
Savings on film/processing by going digital will vary with many factors.
Here's a very simplified calculation.
Cost per film: NOK 115,- (Provia F: NOK 65,- and Processing: NOK 50,-)
Given the ballpark price of *istD or Canon 10D around NOK 18000,-
one needs to shoot around 160 films to break
I'd rather not. g
Cotty wrote:
Frank your not weird, everyone else is.
Hmm, can we put this to a vote??
Cheers,
Cotty
who will also be buried with an MX, winder, 28 2.8...
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=| www.macads.co.uk/snaps
Well, a 16-35mm FA* zoom will be nice - but how much it would cost? Even if
(let's hope) Pentax will make such a lens, there is still room for a cheaper
DA equivalent, because that'll be the standard lens for *istD (instead of a
18-something FAJ cheap zoom).
Alex Sarbu
- Original Message
when I got back into photography several years
ago, the clerk at my local Service Merchandise store told me that the
TV on the ZX-50 dial was for taking photos of a television screen.
NO! ROTFLMAO!!!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
Hi Sylwester,
on 08 Aug 03 you wrote in pentax.list:
At last here it is http://www.dpreview.com/news/0308/
03080802pentaxistd.asp
Noticeably smaller than competition and with bigger viewfinder. Really
nice :-)
Yes, I'll love it! Especially the comparison to other manufacturer's
modells is
And just because we like pentax cameras doesn't mean that we use ONLY
pentax cameras - we're open minded enough to try out other brands...
But yes.. we like funny named beer!!
Cheers
Dave
Original Message:
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 10:13:57 US/Eastern
To:
Hi!
Just like the subject has it. I've seen the first film that I shot
with my ME Super after I got it from the repairs. It seems that all
shutter speeds faster than 1/250 sec are not working properly. The
results is mostly blank (unexposed) frame. The rest is perfectly
exposed frames.
The shop
Thats why I the full
frame sensors will be more relevant for today's MF market than 135.
DagT
This is one of the concepts that has somewhat escaped me, why full frame
sensors are more appropriate in a MF body then a 35mm format body. Earlier
threads were talking about 35mm frame sized sensors.
Pretty please with sugar and a cherry on top.
Thanks, mate.
Only i thought I'd save it for the webpage, you see...
Ah. Of course. Carry on then. ;-)
Got the slide films back today.
The lab had 50% reduced staff and normal workload, so he
asked me if I could wait until Monday with the
1 - 100 of 496 matches
Mail list logo
