On 3/11/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
For the cause I will gladly let my name be known for the mentioned
collective noun.
Umm, someone has to ask this.
Would a person buying several LXes then be doing a Cesar
Metamorphosis?
And surely if it can rain cats and dogs it can hale Cesars?
Cotty wrote:
On 3/11/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But, mostly, do what you think is best ~for you~.
I like what Michael Reichmann told me: The camera manufacturer has no
right in the world to tell me what height to width ratio to make my
Beautiful colors! I'm disappointed that we didn't get a show where I
live.
Thanks for sharing.
Christian Skofteland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: David Dixon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 7:43 AM
Subject: Re: Anybody
Cotty wrote:
On 3/11/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But, mostly, do what you think is best ~for you~.
I like what Michael Reichmann told me: The camera manufacturer has no
right in the world to tell me what height to width ratio to make my
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Rob Studdert wrote:
On 3 Nov 2003 at 22:35, John Francis wrote:
Oops. Make that IR and near-IR, not UV.
There is increased sensitivity into the UV, too, but that causes
things to look more blue, not more red. Proof-read more carefully!
If the *ist D is like most
Hi,
Thinking (dreaming, more like) about how to become fabulously wealthy, I
wondered if there is a potential market for new lens hoods for DSLRs.
I assume that the original, 35mm coverage, lenshoods could now be
significantly extended and not impinge on the APS-sized-chip image?
mike
Probably U.S. dollars - if you lived in Europe, I would suggest Euros as an
alternative, but since you don't you may as well make it U.S. $
Maris
Leon Altoff wrote:
Hi all,
Well, I'm back to selling off unused equipment. However, due to the
changes in currencies and exchange rates, I'm
Hi,
Tuesday, November 4, 2003, 9:55:06 AM, you wrote:
Yes, I order from Peter is Sunny Brighton, he told me he can't get hold
of the *ist D. So I ordered from TechnikDirekt in Germany, it would take
two weeks. That was 15 days ago, yesterday I received an email from
TechnikDirekt that the
Sometimes, cropping becomes a total necessity. A few weeks ago, our younger
daughter Rani brought us our latest adopted Bearded Collie from a breeder
near her home in Atlanta. As Rani and my wife were going on to a further
destination, I use my Optio totake a picture of mother, daughter and new
Hi,
Tuesday, November 4, 2003, 3:30:58 PM, you wrote:
Hi,
Thinking (dreaming, more like) about how to become fabulously wealthy, I
wondered if there is a potential market for new lens hoods for DSLRs.
I assume that the original, 35mm coverage, lenshoods could now be
significantly extended
Whatever the impact of digital, film cameras seem to have retained their
value, judging from adverts and the eBay auctions I've often followed with
more than a passing interest.
Seems to depend on category. Pro cameras lose value horribly because they
are no longer feature-current (plus a lot
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
Is it just me or does it seem that digicams
are coming out at a blazing rate? Feels like
several new models A WEEK!
JCO
How much do they actually differ? I haven't been watching closely but
I haven't seen a lot of change of the cheap digicam
Christian wrote:
CS Beautiful colors! I'm disappointed that we didn't get a show where I
CS live.
Actually you shouldn't. The lower is the latitude where aurora can
be seen, the more deformed the earth magnetic field is and so the
higher the impact over communication, electrical grid,
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Dario Bonazza 2 wrote:
Hi all,
I believe I've finished adding more and more pictures to my *ist D test,
including some (I believe) interesting comparison among lenses. Those shots
partially contradict some of my previous thoughts, where I was rather
convinced that you
That, Don, remains to be decided.
Jostein
-
Pictures at: http://oksne.net
-
- Original Message -
From: Dr E D F Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 2:52 PM
Subject: Re: PUG themes 2004
This is one reason why 6x6 is used.
You are the scissors.
And, most any skilled 35mm machine printer (person) can control
the machine to print full-frame. Looks like a letter-boxed TV show.
Collin
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 13:55:37 +
On 3/11/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
frank theriault
head). Full aperture meaning the lowest setting, like 2 or 5.6 something? Wide
open? If the camera can't read the aperture, how can it know which f stop is
full open on the lens?
Full aperture is wide open (using the full area of the lens, not just a part).
The camera *doesn't* know what f
Locall, one major film camera retailer pretty much only sells
film cameras to bw students. Almost everyone else gets
digital From $1000 to $2000, the nice solutions are really hot.
And this Christmas they're going to get even hotter.
Collin
snip
Still, if film were about to die I'd expect KEH
Long story short: I bought the *ist-D on the 28th of September and ran off
with it for three weeks in Australia. Shot about 800 images and one thing
kept bothering me: The DOF preview switch wasn't working actually,
sometimes it worked but most of the time it didn't. It didn't worry me
- Original Message -
From: Collin Brendemuehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is one reason why 6x6 is used.
You are the scissors.
Collin
Wasn't there a thread a while back that proved that 6x6 was a wasted format?
;-)
Christian
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Bob Walkden wrote:
Hi,
Tuesday, November 4, 2003, 6:29:23 AM, you wrote:
[...]
There must have been a time that people said, real photographers don't need
cameras with built-in meters. Because it's been about everything since, like
real photographers don't
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Herb Chong wrote:
digital enablement has been less than rewarding on the software front. Photo
Browser is about as minimal as one can get and still be able to do
something, and PhotoLab is only a little bit more useful. i suppose it is
just having to cut all those corners
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, mike.wilson wrote:
Hi,
Thinking (dreaming, more like) about how to become fabulously wealthy, I
wondered if there is a potential market for new lens hoods for DSLRs.
I assume that the original, 35mm coverage, lenshoods could now be
significantly extended and not
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Bob Walkden wrote:
Cartier-Bresson apparently has a near-perfect ability to judge the
correct exposure without a meter at all. I believe some people on this
list claim to be able to do that. I can do it for certain _very_ simple
situations based around sunny-16 (well, it's
Leon Altoff wrote:
Hi all,
Would those of you in the US bid on an auction that was in Australian
dollars or Euros? Would those of you in Europe be more likely to bid
in Euros? Do the Canadians out there mind bidding in other
currencies? Or should I just accept that the US dollar
John Francis wrote
With the exception of a very small number of specialty lenses, all K-mount
lenses work in this full-aperture metering mode, rather than the alternative
(stop-down metering, where the light is measured at the taking aperture).
Okay, now I finally understand what stopped down
Hi!
I need to find an attorney, preferably in California, that would be
willing to take a case in which a customer tries to sue ISP (or Web
SP) for failure of ISP's servers where the customer's internet shop
and other pages brining monetary profit are hosted. Naturally, we're
talking about quite
I remember somebody pointing out that the K1000 is basically a Spotmatic
SP F. They share a lot of physical features (including that silly
photoswitch for the light meter, which iirc no other Pentax has) and
are functionally pretty much identical except for the K mount.
Question is, is the
Cartier-Bresson apparently has a near-perfect ability to judge the correct
exposure without a meter at all. I believe some people on this list
claim to be able to do that. I can do it for certain _very_ simple
situations based around sunny-16 (well, it's not a matter of judgement
but of
I have Spamkiller on my PC because I get 100 to 200 spams a day.
Unfortunately it kills some valid mail every once in a while. A lot of
my clients are lawyers, and the legalese they always seem to have
appended to their emails trips the spamkiller.
tv
I know there is a lawyer joke in there
And, most any skilled 35mm machine printer (person) can control
the machine to print full-frame. Looks like a letter-boxed TV show.
Collin
When I home print my 8x10's, I print 7x11s (approx. -- lousy at math here,
whatever it works out to be). I print all my *big* blow-ups (8 1/2 x 11 paper
Yesterday, the owner of the store told me to bring the camera in with the
box and he would replace it. It was replaced today, and I'm happy to
report
that my new new *ist-D works fine.
Christian
Consider yourself very fortunate. Mine was sent to Pentax Colorado last
Monday via overnight
I'm thinking of moving my photography from the 70s to the 80s (or even
beyond) and embrace this new fangled autofocus thing.
I'm considering buying an autofocus camera to replace an LX.
Reading between the lines on some recent posts, people seem to value their
PZ-1p higher than the MZ-S.
My
- Original Message -
From: Collin Brendemuehl
Subject: Re: Cropping
And, most any skilled 35mm machine printer (person) can control
the machine to print full-frame. Looks like a letter-boxed TV show.
Well, no. It doesn't matter what the skill level is, most all machines crop
the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whatever the impact of digital, film cameras seem to have retained
their value, judging from adverts and the eBay auctions I've often
followed with more than a passing interest.
Seems to depend on category. Pro cameras lose value
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Peter Jordan wrote:
Reading between the lines on some recent posts, people seem to value their
PZ-1p higher than the MZ-S.
My impressions are that the autofocus on the MZ-S is faster (which I
probably don't need as I don't do many action shots), but the user interface
on
- Original Message -
From: Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Consider yourself very fortunate. Mine was sent to Pentax Colorado last
Monday via overnight Fedex and was signed for at 0923 Tuesday morning.
Last
Friday I got word that they had received it, but wouldn't get around to
Bill,
You may have said already, but I missed it if you did: what went wrong with
your *istD?
Quoting Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Yesterday, the owner of the store told me to bring the camera in with the
box and he would replace it. It was replaced today, and I'm happy to
report
Date and time would not remain set. Every time the camera was powered up, I
got the date/time screen showing 01/01/03 and 00:00. I replaced the backup
battery per instructions in the manual, no change.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hey Chris,
Btw, what ever happened to that 'great 18-35 lens pass around' thing you
were thinking of?
Cheers,
Ryan
On BW or color negative film you really
only need to be within a couple
of stops. Most pros are probably at least that good from constant
practice.
This is one of the most absurd statements i have ever heard,
especially comining from someone who purports to be a photographer.
Try a
If I can buy an MZ-S for 450, a PZ-1P for 300 and a PZ-1 for 200 which
are typical s/h prices in the UK, what should I go for?
That really *has* to be your decision. We don't know what's important to
you. You've read the list of differences between the PZ-1 and the PZ-1p.
Apart from that
Hi,
frank theriault wrote:
Well, converted into Canadian dollars, that's more or less what I paid for
mine, bought off a list member.
And about half what I paid nearly (gulp) 10 years ago. I am definitely
looking for another now. At the prices they are going for, I don't
understand why
I'm thinking of moving my photography from
the
70s to the 80s (or even
beyond) and embrace this new fangled autofocus thing.
So the question is fairly simple.
If I can buy an MZ-S for £450, a PZ-1P for £300 and a PZ-1 for £200 which
are typical s/h
Actually with print film you can miss by a mile and
still get a decent print from it ( a mile to me is a
stop ) with slide film miss by 1/3 a stop and your
screwed. Colour print has reached a point where unless
you study the negs you won't really know if your
exposure is off, the mini labs always
when I signed up everyone backed out, for fear they
may become infected with sars :p
--- Ryan Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey
Chris,
Btw, what ever happened to that 'great 18-35 lens
pass around' thing you
were thinking of?
Cheers,
Ryan
Hi Leon,
Leon Altoff wrote:
Well, I'm back to selling off unused equipment. However, due to the
changes in currencies and exchange rates, I'm considering what currency
to list the auctions in.
When I look at ebay pages, the currency is automatically converted into
Sterling. As it jolly well
Hi Frits,
Frits Wüthrich wrote:
Yes, I order from Peter is Sunny Brighton, he told me he can't get hold
of the *ist D. So I ordered from TechnikDirekt in Germany, it would take
two weeks. That was 15 days ago, yesterday I received an email from
TechnikDirekt that the 'producer can not yet
Hi, Ryan. We didn't get enough people interested to make it financially
feasible. It's too bad... I think it would have been fun. I'll keep an
eye out for reasonably-priced, interesting used lenses, though.
chris
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Ryan Lee wrote:
Hey Chris,
Btw, what ever happened to
Hi,
Frits Wüthrich wrote:
Thanks. I is about 95 euro more expensive, beside the ferry. It might be
a nice break though.
Let me know if you need help.
mike
Wow! My *istD just arrived. Got it plus FAJ 18-35 and the AF360FGZ
flash on eBay for $1575. I don't know how the guy could do it, but he
had overwhelmingly positive feedback, so I took a chance.
Will probably sell the 18-35, since I already have the Sigma 15-30,
which is fantastic. If
Actually with print film you can miss by a mile and
still get a decent print from it ( a mile to me is a
stop ) with slide film miss by 1/3 a stop and your
screwed. Colour print has reached a point where unless
you study the negs you won't really know if your
exposure is off, the mini labs
On 4/11/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Thinking (dreaming, more like) about how to become fabulously wealthy, I
wondered if there is a potential market for new lens hoods for DSLRs.
I assume that the original, 35mm coverage, lenshoods could now be
significantly extended and not impinge on the
That's odd.
I can go to Cord and get prints made full-frame just by asking
that they be printed that way.
At 16:34 2003.11.04 -0500, you wrote:
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 12:30:11 -0600
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Collin Brendemuehl
Subject: Re: Cropping
It's amazing how much difference of opinion there is on these two cameras.
Probably since they are both great cameras. I have owned both and wish I
still did, but I had to sell one for financial reasons. I chose to keep the
MZ-S and I do not regret that decision in the least. I have the battery
Mr Reichman wades in:
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/pentax-istd.shtml
Not an endearing review. He covers all the relevant points I think, both good and
bad, but seems to do so from an unfavourable predisposition. Cant say any of his
facts are incorrect, but everything
Congratulations, John.
A couple of observations:
The price you paid was good -- lower than NY mail order. If a local
store can do this, then the NY prices must be too high.
Some time back Pål told us that demand would exceed supply for a year.
This does not appear to be so. They are available
Wow! Good price. Have fun with the new toys.
Jim A.
From: Robert Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 16:17:43 -0600
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Woohoo, its here!
Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 17:17:42 -0500
- Original Message -
From: Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It has one wheel for your right hand thumb to adjust shutter speed, and
one
wheel for your index to adjust the aperture.
Cheers,
Jostein
This makes logical sense to me, whereas the *ist-D's layout does not: index
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
Locall, one major film camera retailer pretty much only sells
film cameras to bw students. Almost everyone else gets
digital From $1000 to $2000, the nice solutions are really hot.
And this Christmas they're going to get even hotter.
Collin
I'll bet the only adage that has never been bantered around is, real
photographers don't need no stinking tripods!
Hehehehe.
Marnie aka Doe ;-)
Yep. Real photographers just hand-hold those 4x5s, just like they did the
old speed graphic!
DJE
then i think you need to do your own development.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 7:19 AM
Subject: Re: New digital cameras
Well, as far as that goes, yes, but even 1/2 stop off can block
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On BW or color negative film you really
only need to be within a couple
of stops. Most pros are probably at least that good from constant
practice.
This is one of the most absurd statements i have ever heard,
especially comining
Do, not did, thank you. GRIN
http://graywolfphoto.com/weegee.html
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll bet the only adage that has never been bantered around is, real
photographers don't need no stinking tripods!
Hehehehe.
Marnie aka Doe ;-)
Yep. Real photographers just hand-hold those 4x5s, just
- Original Message -
From: Rob Brigham
Subject: Another review comes online...
Mr Reichman wades in:
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/pentax-istd.shtml
Not an endearing review.
review of the review snipped
I recall that Mr Reichmann is pretty unabashedly pro
- Original Message -
From:
Subject: Exposure: was New digital cameras
On BW or color negative film you really
only need to be within a couple
of stops. Most pros are probably at least that good from constant
practice.
This is one of the most absurd statements i have ever
- Original Message -
From: Collin R Brendemuehl
Subject: Re: Cropping
That's odd.
I can go to Cord and get prints made full-frame just by asking
that they be printed that way.
Find out what they are using to print the full frame stuff, I am interested
in knowing. All the machines
Hi all,
Sorry to do this but I don`t know any attorneys`. Could I have
your opinion on this, my friend is moving to Sweden (his home)
and he wants to use my address to keep his greencard active.
Will I be liable for anything?
Thanks and sorry for the OT, but this is the most knowledgeable
groups
They didn't. The wheels in the Z1p and the *istD perform identical functions.
Jostein must know something I don't!
Quoting Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
- Original Message -
From: Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It has one wheel for your right hand thumb to adjust shutter speed, and
I agree that the layout is fundamentally intuitive for me. Great camera all
around, with the exception of the weatherproofing, sometimes a problem for me
in Vancouver's rainy weather.
Quoting John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
- Original Message -
From: Jostein [EMAIL
Collin R Brendemuehl wrote:
And, most any skilled 35mm machine printer (person) can control
the machine to print full-frame. Looks like a letter-boxed TV show.
Well, no. It doesn't matter what the skill level is, most all machines crop
the negative to some extent, and nothing can be
DJE replied to Marnie:
I'll bet the only adage that has never been bantered around is, real
photographers don't need no stinking tripods!
Hehehehe.
Yep. Real photographers just hand-hold those 4x5s, just like they did the
old speed graphic!
Y'know, with the borrowed 4x5 I'm
The mirror/shutter vibration is significant enough to cause problem with
slow shutter speed handheld shots or supertele like 600mm. If that's
important to you, you can forget Z-1p.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
I'm thinking of moving my photography from the 70s to the 80s (or even
i wasn't going to say it, but i use the Nikon and several other vendor's
browsers and the Pentax one is the most minimal featured. if it were not for
it being the only software that knows how to deal with Pentax RAW, i
wouldn't have even installed it. the current version of NikonView is 6.0 and
you have no idea what the lab did versus what can be done then.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 5:35 PM
Subject: Re: Exposure: was New digital cameras
Actually, that's not correct. The lab can
i think you are being absurd. the densitometer says you are too.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 2:14 PM
Subject: Exposure: was New digital cameras
On BW or color negative film you really
I can honestly say that the pz-1 is 100% quieter than the sf-1.I'LL KEEP THIS THING.
Beside the SP ..
Dave
The mirror/shutter vibration is significant enough
to
cause problem with
slow shutter speed handheld shots or supertele like 600mm. If
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 16:51:18 -0800, Steve Larson wrote:
Sorry to do this but I don`t know any attorneys`. Could I have
your opinion on this, my friend is moving to Sweden (his home)
and he wants to use my address to keep his greencard active.
Will I be liable for anything?
IANAL (I Am Not A
Hi all,
Sorry to do this but I don`t know any attorneys`. Could I have
your opinion on this, my friend is moving to Sweden (his home)
and he wants to use my address to keep his greencard active.
Will I be liable for anything?
Thanks and sorry for the
28-105 something,Chris
Dave
Oh and i;ll talk to you about the cables soon.:-)
Dave
Hi, Ryan. We didn't get enough people interested to make it financially
feasible. It's too bad... I think it would have been fun. I'll keep an
eye out for
Columbus is a pretty white-collar area.
That may be the factor playing out here.
But every other time I'm in the store
there's a dslr going out.
They move a boatload of ps digitals as well.
CRB
At 19:53 2003.11.04 -0500, you wrote:
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 17:43:49 -0600 (CST)
From: [EMAIL
He has been to pro canon for some time now, some
things he bashes the pentac for the canon still
suffers from ( usb 1.1 ) and what we praise ( the
shutter release collar ) we praise, the other things
we aldready know about, his canno is superior tone
rings loud and clear in here. This is Pentaxes
I'm getting a remote release for the *ist D and oddly the IR remote
seems to be less expensive than the cable remote. How does the IR
remote work with long exposures in the B mode? Is there any reason to
get the cable remote over the IR remote?
To continue another thread, I stopped by Ballard
I have a Spotmatic II motor drive camera and motor. Did Pentax ever make an
adapter to allow use of AA batteries? Anyone, by chance, have one of these
they would like to let go?
Jim A.
yes, you don't have to stand or hold the wired remote in front of the
camera. the wireless remote works only from the front. if you are still
looking through the viewfinder, that is hard to do reliably. the IR remote
doesn't work in B mode.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: alex wetmore
Where did you find the IR remote?
rg
alex wetmore wrote:
I'm getting a remote release for the *ist D and oddly the IR remote
seems to be less expensive than the cable remote. How does the IR
remote work with long exposures in the B mode? Is there any reason to
get the cable remote over the IR
When I ask for a full frame 8x10 at my local store, I always expect a
6.66x10, I always get a 8x12 instead. If I want it in an 8x10 frame, I need
to crop it...
Stan
on 11/04/03 6:56 PM, D. Glenn Arthur Jr. at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Collin R Brendemuehl wrote:
And, most any skilled 35mm
Congratulations, John.
A couple of observations:
The price you paid was good -- lower than NY mail
order. If a local
store can do this, then the NY prices must be too
high.
Some time back Pål told us that demand would exceed
supply for a year.
This does not appear to be so. They are available
Congrats, Robert.
Ain't new toys fun?
vbg
cheers,
frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Robert Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Woohoo, its here!
Thanks.
Yes, new toys are nice; last time was a few years ago, except for some
used lenses in between.
I'm so freaked by the possibility of getting dust on the sensor that I
have not taken off the first lens I put on it (85mm 1.4). At least it
is a nice lens.
Congrats on your LX. I always
I also bought my istD at a local store, Millburn camera in Millburn, NJ.
The price, $1375 without lens, was better than I could find in NYC or
online. He knowe he'll get more business from me.
John Mullan wrote:
I had been watching the prices, and when I found the
local store had a price
Sorry if someone already answered this, I couldn't find it through a
quick search.
Anyone know of what file format the *istD supports? Any CF card 2Gb
must be backed up by FAT32 support.
Thanks,
rg
Brendan wrote, re Luminous Reichmann:
He has been to pro canon for some time now...
Suppose the only reason he likes *any* Pentax cameras is that Canon doesn't do
medium format?
Peter: I have all three cameras so I can speak with some knowledge. First
off, I would not sell the LX. You will regret it. If you have two LXs, by all
means sell one. But I would not be without an LX.
Second: I would not say the PZ1 (P) is a better interface than the MZ-S. In
fact, if you are
Stan Halpin wrote:
When I ask for a full frame 8x10 at my local store, I always expect a
6.66x10, I always get a 8x12 instead. If I want it in an 8x10 frame, I need
to crop it...
Huh. If I order a full frame 8x10, the folks at the
lab that does machine prints ask, Do you mean an 8x12
machine
95 matches
Mail list logo
