John Francis wrote:
even a film body and film for special occasions.
The truth will out.
8-)
Nice one Markus.
The curve of the neck really makes this image I think. The only thing
I would suggest is cropping some of the empty space on the left.
FYI, white swans are a novelty in these parts, I've only ever seen
them in the zoo. All the wild swans are black with bright red beaks
Dave S
O
Hi Markus ...
It seems that each photo has it's own story, both in terms of what's
happening in the photograph and in terms of how I grabbed the shot.
Sometimes I'll just quickly frame the scene and shoot a few frames, other
times a more studied approach is made, and at other times, if there's
On May 13, 2005, at 10:09 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I have no trouble swapping matte black and photo black inks on my
Epson 2200. It's a simple process.
I have to delete the printer and re-load it in the Print Center (in
addition to restarting Photoshop). If I leave the Matte cartridge in
th
Hi, Thanks to Don I think the problem I was having with the pic has been
fixed, and while I was at it, the annoying tilt that I overlooked has been
corrected as well. So, here's the newer version:
http://home.earthlink.net/~scbelinkoff/lux-rentals3.html
And here's the earlier version:
http://h
Two quick shots taken this spring one early one a couple of days ago.
http://www.mindspring.com/~webster26/PESO_--_tothesea.html
http://www.mindspring.com/~webster26/PESO_--_invatation.html
Both taken with the *ist-D and SMCP FA 20-35mm f4.0
As usual comments are welcome but may be totally ignored.
If you get the *ist-D now, you'll probably be able to afford the 77
sooner than you'd be able to afford the *ist-D if you buy the 77 now.
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 10:09:23PM -0700, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> Hi David ...
>
> I was visiting a friend today and discussing just this dilemma ... the 77
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 01:27:16PM +1000, Leon Altoff wrote:
> On Fri, 13 May 2005 21:45:01 -0400 (EDT), John Francis wrote:
>
> >the 250-600. I eventually succumbed to temptation,
> >and ordered a 1510 (officially a birthday present from
> >the financial controller).
>
> John,
>
> The pelican
Ahhh ... that's what's bothering me about the pic, That window withe the
"... Four New ..." is a little intense, and the tonal balance is a bit off.
I think you've nailed it, Don. Thanks!
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Don Sanderson
> Certainly makes a powerful statement to me Shel.
> I
Hi David ...
I was visiting a friend today and discussing just this dilemma ... the 77
or an istD. I'll probably have a better feel for the decision when the
film I shot yesterday comes back from the lab. While most of the pics I
took were dreck, just for the purpose of continuing testing the Ag
So I gave the eBay dealer who sold me the Vivitar 28MM f2 with the non
functioning diaphragm with oily blades a "Neutral" rating. His description
did say "IT IS CLEAR AND SEEMS TO WORK."
Now the ***bleepity bleep%%% dip stick retaliates and gives me a neutral
rating.
Here are some full size imag
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
You've pretty well nailed it, Bruce, although according to (ERN?) some of
the things that are "lacking" in Elements are available one way or another.
She posted that information a few days ago, but I can't recall exactly
what's available or the sources. I seem to recall some
Hi!
Anyone remember Steve Martin's pixel board in LA Story?
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3360587&size=lg
Comments are always welcome and encouraged. Thanks in advance to
those of you who look, and again to those who choose to comment.
LOL :).
Frank, I seem to have sent you a priva
Hi!
OK, I admit it's kind of a cheap shot, but I couldn't pass up the irony of
the scene, for which an apology must be offered. Irony, in and of itself,
does not make for a good photograph, although it might be worth some
discussion points. I probably should have just noted the scene to myself
and
You could always get a slightly bigger bag
Dave S
On 5/13/05, UncaMikey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am as susceptible to gear lust as anyone, I suppose, but I can't get
> anything else because there is no more room in the bag! Larf!
>
> *>UncaMikey
Hi!
lately, at the cat exhibition: "And I told the jury before that I can't
stand Coca Cola!"
The link: http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3360813&size=lg (91KB)
The main question here is whether Coca Cola causes or cures this unusual
eye condition :).
I find it most humorous :).
Boris
Hi!
http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/cable2.html
They are framed. You are nailed :).
I really like this one. It is very alive!
Boris
G'day Shel,
I have heard the same thing about the change in focus mechanism, on
this list I think, but I don't have any solid information about it.
I've never had the chance to use the 43. But both my 77 & 31 have the
same focus feel. As well as feeling nice, they also take great
pictures to boot
On 5/13/05, Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why Not? (couldn't resist)
That was an alternate title...
-frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
On 5/13/05, Joseph Tainter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nice, Frank, it fully conveys the sense of a totally urban
> place. I find it appealing.
>
Thanks, Joe.
The place is called Dundas Square, and it's part of a recent
multi-million dollar effort to "revitalize" downtown by putting a
great big
On 5/13/05, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Very good range of grayscale in this shot. Contrast seems right on.
> Good composition and framing as well. In other words, I like it.
> Paul
Glad you like it, Paul. Thanks.
-frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-
On 5/13/05, UncaMikey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I really like this one, Frank! The board does seem to be pointedly
> asking the woman who is hurrying from left to right, why? You captured
> it at just the right moment, I think.
Thanks, Mikey! I kinda (with the greatest of humility) feel
On Fri, 13 May 2005 21:45:01 -0400 (EDT), John Francis wrote:
>the 250-600. I eventually succumbed to temptation,
>and ordered a 1510 (officially a birthday present from
>the financial controller).
John,
The pelican website doesn't say what the 1510 weighs. the next time
you have it empty coul
On 5/13/05, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On the other hand it is mostly in focus.
Sorry.
I'll make up for the focus thing with my next PAW. I'm not kidding...
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
G'day Shel
This my be slightly blasphemous in this digital age but I'd say get
the lens. You will not regret it.
Then again, if your getting fed up with shooting film , get the *ist D.
Dave S
On 5/13/05, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I swapped lenses for the afternoon with anothe
I don't think it's been released anywhere yet.
Dave S
On 5/14/05, Doug Franklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 13 May 2005 21:25:29 +1200, David Mann wrote:
>
> > > http://www.photo-i.co.uk/News/May05/Epson%202400.htm
> >
> > I posted that URL a couple of days ago but noone responded... ma
about a month ago, a German newspaper said that they were thinking of
selling their compact camera division and only keeping their "larger"
cameras and binoculars. the sales will be to Panasonic. given that Leica's
losses widened last quarter and is expected to grow some more, it's still
not ce
I must say I didn't see the original post of this, but I have to agree
with most of the comments about the tonality and composition, it's very
good. On the other hand it is mostly in focus.
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Very good range of grayscale in this shot. Contrast seems right on.
Good compositi
Ugly yes, a better than 1.5 crop (1.37, still not what I'd like to see
but a step in the right direction), 10mp and a price between the Canon
16mp and Kodak 13mp offerings. It's a better alternative and looks more
viable than I had expected. I wonder how many they need to sell to
break even.
On 14 May 2005 at 8:20, Derby Chang wrote:
> Seems like it is finally going to come out. Interesting to see the back
> writes to DNG as its raw format. Interesting too that Leica have turned
> a design constraints - there wasn't enough space to fit an AA filter -
> into a design feature.
Unfo
Remember I said that if I bought another camera case,
it would be a Pelican? Well, I did, and it was.
I've been looking for something a little smaller than
my big Pelican, for those day's when I'm not carrying
the 250-600. I eventually succumbed to temptation,
and ordered a 1510 (officially a b
> ...dba FA* 300 f4.5.
What is the significance of the subject line (i.e., not being 300/4.5)?
Fred
Certainly makes a powerful statement to me Shel.
I feel the "Introducing Four New" part rather
bright and distracting but overall a very good grab.
I've had it on the screen for a while now, it's
provoked quite a few thoughts, a very succesfull
photo in my opinion.
Don
> -Original Message
--- Joseph Tainter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Price was $850 Canadian, about $685 U.S. I thought that was
> a steal, especially considering that one went on eBay for
> over $1200 recently.
I wasn't aware it had gone that high. Last time I checked it was US$850
buy-it-now
for the FA*. Btw, don
I have no ill will towards you, Doug. I don't even know you. My comment "
...who have not provided information that I have found wanting in the
past..." means just that. Certain people have recommended lenses, film,
gear, whatever, and over time i have come to learn that they see things in
a wa
Why Not? (couldn't resist)
Jack
--- frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone remember Steve Martin's pixel board in LA
> Story?
>
>
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3360587&size=lg
>
> Comments are always welcome and encouraged. Thanks
> in advance to
> those of you who
...dba FA* 300 f4.5. When I announced last week that I was
looking for one of these, Alan Chan and Cameron Hood both
told me that there was a mint one at Kerrisdale's in
Vancouver, with box and case. What a great list this is.
Thanks again, guys.
Price was $850 Canadian, about $685 U.S. I thou
Frank, I really like this one.
I was thinking it might be better at "rush hour" with about
100 people going every which way.
The more I look at it though I'm not too sure it isn't about
perfect this way.
I can imagine myself as the guy rushing across the foreground,
wondering just that...Why?
Must
- Original Message -
From: "Kostas Kavoussanakis"
Subject: Re: Wonderful!
It was placed on his D or Ds - can't remember which - and I was
impressed. Such a pity - to me the 77 represented the quality level I
would like to see on *all* lenses made by Pentax these days.
I am quite pleased
You'll get no argument from me, Paul. Just to put the pic in perspective,
I was walking with a friend, and for the most part I photograph alone.
That allows me the luxury to get a little closer and more personal with my
subjects, and regardless of whether or not one likes that type of
photography
Hi UncaMikey
indeed, a lot of clever cats and stupid acting people was there including
the photographer and his flash ;-)
greetings
Markus
>
>>--- Markus Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> lately, at the cat exhibition: "And I told the jury before that I
>>> can't
>>> stand Coca Cola!"
>>>
>>>
On May 13, 2005, at 4:50 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I'm not sure how to take your post - whether you're trying to be
funny,
sarcastic, caustic, condescending, or judgmental. Maybe all of those
things.
hmmm, I guess I could say the same thing about the rest of your message.
So, just to be clear, I
--- Markus Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> lately, at the cat exhibition: "And I told the jury before that I
> can't
> stand Coca Cola!"
>
> The link: http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3360813&size=lg
Larf! But you forgot to turn on "blue eye reduction" on your flash!
*>UncaMikey
Nice, Frank, it fully conveys the sense of a totally urban
place. I find it appealing.
Joe
lately, at the cat exhibition: "And I told the jury before that I can't
stand Coca Cola!"
The link: http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3360813&size=lg (91KB)
just for fun ;-)
Markus
I was wrong about the tonality. I had forgotten that I looked at this
pic at work on my crappy monitor. I just reviewed it again on my
calibrated monitor, and t's pretty close to spot on. But I still don't
think it's one of your best in terms of composition or even subject
matter. However, I'm
Hi Shel,
I don't find this exploitative or cheap. It's journalism pure and
simple. However, I don't think it measures up to the standard your
other work has established in terms of composition or even tonality. In
regard to composition it's just too standard and pat. I think the
tonality leads
--- Graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yep that is hard. I just looked at B&H's website and contrary to what Alan
> says
> they are both currently $179 there. Now the only question is the new one
> built as
> well as the old one? With so many things these days the actual improvement is
> the
Very good range of grayscale in this shot. Contrast seems right on.
Good composition and framing as well. In other words, I like it.
Paul
On May 13, 2005, at 6:29 PM, frank theriault wrote:
Anyone remember Steve Martin's pixel board in LA Story?
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=33605
--- frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone remember Steve Martin's pixel board in LA Story?
>
> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3360587&size=lg
I really like this one, Frank! The board does seem to be pointedly
asking the woman who is hurrying from left to right, why?
Yep that is hard. I just looked at B&H's website and contrary to what Alan says they are both currently $179 there. Now the only question is the new one built as well as the old one? With so many things these days the actual improvement is the new one is more cheaply made. You would have to actuall
On 5/13/05, Jens Bladt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I understand (some) of your reservations.
> The photograph is meant to be part of a Camera Club Exibtion (Christmas
> time) on the Southern Harbour in my home town.
>
> The reason is, that the harbour environment will disappear/change during the
On Fri, 13 May 2005 08:05:48 -0600, William Robb wrote:
> The Zenitar that I had displayed very good flare resistance. I think
> the shot that Doug shoed on the PUG is about the only way to get
> the thing to flare seriously. I did some shots straight into the sun
> with little or no flare at all.
Well, their latest catalog (Summer 2005) shows the BII at 179 and nothing about
an S. Guess I will have to check the website.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
---
Alan Chan wrote:
--- Graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
B&H's c
On 5/13/05, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, I admit it's kind of a cheap shot, but I couldn't pass up the irony of
> the scene, for which an apology must be offered. Irony, in and of itself,
> does not make for a good photograph, although it might be worth some
> discussion points.
On Fri, 13 May 2005 05:57:09 -0400, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> I love that shot, but that flare is quite prominent. I'm not
> impressed with the flare control exhibited here. I've shot
> into the sun with Pentax lenses with far less flare showing
> up in the frame.
I guess it's a matter of what you'
On Fri, 13 May 2005 21:25:29 +1200, David Mann wrote:
> > http://www.photo-i.co.uk/News/May05/Epson%202400.htm
>
> I posted that URL a couple of days ago but noone responded... maybe
> nobody saw it.
I checked around using froogle.google.com and a couple of the other
"metashopping" web sites a
Hi Shel
your group shots in the cable car raises a question of your shooting style
for me:
How do you compose shots like this:
Are you able to control the whole image (and facial expressions) of the
people which seems impossible
or do you just concentrate on the most important ones or part of your
On 5/13/05, Markus Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Shel and Frank
> I agree with Shel that a series with different people and one with only the
> signs would have been interesting.
> On the other side, I like the sign on the crane as a nice addition and
> balance to the right one on the floo
On 5/13/05, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But ranFk, you've told me again what you said earlier Good thing you said
> you'd not repeat yourself, otherwise I'd think you did
>
> Frnakf, you're a joy to have on the list ...
>
> Lesh
>
>
Oh.
I thought I said more to you off-list.
On 5/13/05, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you remember the character played by Dayton Allen on the old SteveAllen
> Show - he used to say "Why Not!"
No. Steve Allen is just a bit before my time - not much but a bit. I
was thinking of calling this one "why not?", though...
>
> I
On 5/13/05, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Nice ... I like the tonalities and geometry in this study. :-)
>
Thanks, Godfrey. I appreciate it!
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
But ranFk, you've told me again what you said earlier Good thing you said
you'd not repeat yourself, otherwise I'd think you did
Frnakf, you're a joy to have on the list ...
Lesh
> [Original Message]
> From: frank theriault
> Well, I already told you off-list what I think, Shel, so I won'
Hi Shel and Frank
I agree with Shel that a series with different people and one with only the
signs would have been interesting.
On the other side, I like the sign on the crane as a nice addition and
balance to the right one on the floor.
A good photo for me, which maybe with other by passers coul
On 5/13/05, Markus Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Very early (for me) in the morning I met some swans caring for their
> plumage. I could shoot from a distance of 1.5 - 2 meters with the Pentax
> SFXn and the Tamron 90mm macro + polarizer and the AF280T flash on Superia
> ISO 100 negative film
Thanks for your comment Frank.
I will take some more shots soon and use a fast 50mm lens and a monopod this
time to avoid all the errors I see this shot.
Glad you could ignore them and still enjoy it...
greetings
Markus
>>-Original Message-
>>From: frank theriault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Do you remember the character played by Dayton Allen on the old SteveAllen
Show - he used to say "Why Not!"
I like this one frankF ... the tonality seems good, framing's not to bad.
But I must ask - I'm almost compelled to ask - how many more views did you
take of this sign? This is a perfect e
Still not 24x36.
Yup, fugly.
Regards,
Bob...
"A picture is worth a thousand words,
but it uses up three thousand times the memory."
From: "Derby Chang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Seems like it is finally going to come out. Interesting to see the back
wri
On 5/13/05, Markus Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A complete different shot for me:
> During my last visit to Dietikon, a small city near Zurich in Switzerland to
> have a look a the flee market, I suddenly got a strong desire to visit the
> catholic church St. Agathe. I light some candles for
The following info sent to me by a former list member:
Black Limited lenses are available through Kerrisdale Cameras, a
reputable dealer in
Vancouver with 10 locations. Talk to salesman Patrick
Luk at the main store in Kerrisdale. A really good guy, he'll package
it up and give you a really g
On 5/13/05, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That'll slow soon enuf. I thank the list for their indulgence and
> bickabrats. Actually, you have Frank to blame for this one. Weeks ago he
> got an off-list copy, and just this morning he reminded me of it, so there
> you go ;-))
>
Sure
On May 13, 2005, at 3:29 PM, frank theriault wrote:
Anyone remember Steve Martin's pixel board in LA Story?
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3360587&size=lg
Comments are always welcome and encouraged. Thanks in advance to
those of you who look, and again to those who choose to comment
Anyone remember Steve Martin's pixel board in LA Story?
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3360587&size=lg
Comments are always welcome and encouraged. Thanks in advance to
those of you who look, and again to those who choose to comment.
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois con
Seems like it is finally going to come out. Interesting to see the back
writes to DNG as its raw format. Interesting too that Leica have turned
a design constraints - there wasn't enough space to fit an AA filter -
into a design feature.
Still think its a fugly camera, though :)
warning: articl
You've pretty well nailed it, Bruce, although according to (ERN?) some of
the things that are "lacking" in Elements are available one way or another.
She posted that information a few days ago, but I can't recall exactly
what's available or the sources. I seem to recall some were hidden
features i
The 77 Ltd seems to be a very nice lens. I had the 31 Ltd and it was a
stunning performer, just a bit larger/heavier than I'd prefer, but the
77 seems compact on the same order as the M85/2 I've already got.
Perhaps if I run into another windfall I'll look into the 77mm.
Personally, I could care
A complete different shot for me:
During my last visit to Dietikon, a small city near Zurich in Switzerland to
have a look a the flee market, I suddenly got a strong desire to visit the
catholic church St. Agathe. I light some candles for my dead friends and
animals too and after reflecting for som
On May 13, 2005, at 1:43 PM, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
Ok, so what should I use for software?
Photoshop Elements with which Plug-Ins or 3rd-part add-ons?
[Mac OS X platform]
I use Photoshop CS with the Camera Raw plug-in for my DS, and I'm happy
with it. Photoshop Elements v3 is under $100, uses t
Hi Mark ...
What are those thoughts?
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Mark Cassino
> ... I have mixed thoughts about the folks who saw you, but
> obviously they were cool with your photo taking.
> > http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/cable2.html
Nice one, Shel! The pair with the sunglasses seem to be together, and the
look from her to him is great. They are also both holding onto the 'hold on"
bars - kinda cool. I have mixed thoughts about the folks who saw you, but
obviously they were cool with your photo taking.
- MCC
- - - - - - - -
I think you may have missed my joke in there Shel.
I was kidding about the rate of course, keep em coming.
rg
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
That'll slow soon enuf. I thank the list for their indulgence and
bickabrats. Actually, you have Frank to blame for this one. Weeks ago he
got an off-list copy, a
Hello Shel,
I have no problem with your frequency. I find for me, that I go in
spurts. A bunch and then nothing for awhile. Just my shooting style
and time that makes it so. Keep on posting...
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Friday, May 13, 2005, 1:56:15 PM, you wrote:
SB> That'll slow soon enuf.
On 13/5/05, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Indeed, Mr. C
Indeed sir.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Hello Collin,
Now that is a loaded question. Partly depends on money and needs.
Picture Window Pro only costs about $90 and has full 16 bit support
and full color management support. I find it more powerful and
versatile than Elements 3, which I also have.
But, if you already have Elements, or
On 13/5/05, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
>that's fine. My people will be happy to cut your people.
Oh dear. That's bad.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
That'll slow soon enuf. I thank the list for their indulgence and
bickabrats. Actually, you have Frank to blame for this one. Weeks ago he
got an off-list copy, and just this morning he reminded me of it, so there
you go ;-))
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Gonz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
Indeed, Mr. C
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Cotty
> On 12/5/05, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >I had a chance to use a black 77mm Ltd today. It was attached to one of
my
> >black MX. Wonderful combination. The lens could very well end up being
my
> >favorite 35mm
Very early (for me) in the morning I met some swans caring for their
plumage. I could shoot from a distance of 1.5 - 2 meters with the Pentax
SFXn and the Tamron 90mm macro + polarizer and the AF280T flash on Superia
ISO 100 negative film. Negative scanned with the Canon 9900F, uncropped but
slight
I'm not sure how to take your post - whether you're trying to be funny,
sarcastic, caustic, condescending, or judgmental. Maybe all of those
things.
So, just to be clear, I like the way the lens looks on the camera, but more
important, I like the way to feels. Its size, the focus feel, the way i
I like my L-308B II.
Does everything but spot.
For that I have a Pentax analog spotmeter.
And it takes a common, cheap battery.
Sincerely,
Collin
Sent via the WebMail system at mail.safe-t.net
Ok, so what should I use for software?
Photoshop Elements with which Plug-Ins or 3rd-part add-ons?
Sincerely,
Collin
Sent via the WebMail system at mail.safe-t.net
Well this is what changed between the II and the S version
The L-308S has numerous new features which make this latest exposure
meter easier to use and more accurate. The new features are as follows:
· ½ or 1/3 step selectable reading to match your digital or film cameras
with customisable settin
--- Jens Bladt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been checking my shots on the internet.
> It seems that 80-90% have a somewhat golden section composition.
> I may have to rethink my photographic apporach...
Be careful -- it's like riding a bike, if you think too much about what
you're doing and
On May 13, 2005, at 7:27 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/cable2.html
very nice!
Godfrey
--- Feroze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well that's six votes for the 308, guess that helps me make my mind up
Well, not really. There are 308II & 308S...
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Yahoo! Mail
Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour:
http://tou
Well that's six votes for the 308, guess that helps me make my mind up
Thanks guys
Feroze
This is really funny!
It seems the auction is ended because the item has been damaged!!!
:-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-)
:-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-)
:-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-):-)
:-):-):
Very nice pic Shel. But at the rate you are going with pics, they no
longer qualify for PAW status nor PESO status. Its more like Shel's
Picture A Minute. LOL.
rg
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/cable2.html
Shel
I've been checking my shots on the internet.
It seems that 80-90% have a somewhat golden section composition.
I may have to rethink my photographic apporach...
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: UncaMikey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi Scott
I don't know what I miss here but this shot looks rather uninspired to me.
Ducks are so simple to photograph, I expected a photo without cropping parts
of the white duck and
"something" more.
greetings
Markus
>>> Stay tuned for even more attempted imitation of the rest of you!
>>>
>>> T
1 - 100 of 214 matches
Mail list logo
