Sometime last night, Leonidas, on of our two cats, has thrown up a
hairball. Not exactly newsworthy, you'd say.
Well, he's done so *after* having a copious meal and on my desk - right
over my new K-7. And I've even been lucky as he missed the open laptop
by a mere inch.
When I discovered the
To quote most any 14 year old girl EEEAAAUUU.
Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
Sometime last night, Leonidas, on of our two cats, has thrown up a
hairball. Not exactly newsworthy, you'd say.
Well, he's done so *after* having a copious meal and on my desk - right
over my new K-7. And I've even been
On Jul 24, 2009, at 13:20, P. J. Alling wrote:
To quote most any 14 year old girl EEEAAAUUU.
14-year-old girl, nothing. That's what *I* was going to say!
-Charles
--
Charles Robinson - charl...@visi.com
Minneapolis, MN
http://charles.robinsontwins.org
All that narrative and NO photos?? =)
- Pat
2009/7/24 Ralf R. Radermacher fotor...@gmx.de:
Sometime last night, Leonidas, on of our two cats, has thrown up a
hairball. Not exactly newsworthy, you'd say.
Well, he's done so *after* having a copious meal and on my desk - right
over my new K-7.
Since day one, I have kept my istDS in a nice soft leather
holster type bag when not in use. And I don't
even have any cats Why leave any DSLR exposed to whatever?
--
J.C. O'Connell (mailto:hifis...@gate.net)
Home Page - www.jchriso.com
Join the Audio CD PLAYER DISCUSSION list -
Thank God.
gldnbearz wrote:
All that narrative and NO photos?? =)
- Pat
2009/7/24 Ralf R. Radermacher fotor...@gmx.de:
Sometime last night, Leonidas, on of our two cats, has thrown up a
hairball. Not exactly newsworthy, you'd say.
Well, he's done so *after* having a copious meal and on
Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
Sometime last night, Leonidas, on of our two cats, has thrown up a
hairball. Not exactly newsworthy, you'd say.
Well, he's done so *after* having a copious meal and on my desk - right
over my new K-7.
Did you get the name of the guy you got that cat from? It wasn't
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: gldnbearz gldnbearz.p...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: K-7, some real-life testing
All that narrative and NO photos?? =)
Now there's a topic for a future PUG - What my cat threw up.
- Pat
2009/7/24 Ralf R
On 24/7/09, Ralf R. Radermacher, discombobulated, unleashed:
Sometime last night, Leonidas, on of our two cats, has thrown up a
hairball. Not exactly newsworthy, you'd say.
Well, he's done so *after* having a copious meal and on my desk - right
over my new K-7. And I've even been lucky as he
On Jul 24, 2009, at 15:04, Cotty wrote:
Ralf, that is the grossest story I have ever read since buying a
computer and going online in 1997. RGH.
The grossest?
You haven't done much exploring out there on the Internet, have you?
-Charles
--
Charles Robinson - charl...@visi.com
On 24/7/09, Charles Robinson, discombobulated, unleashed:
The grossest?
You haven't done much exploring out there on the Internet, have you?
Charles - all things are relative. Of course I have seen severed heads
and toilet slavery, but come on - you have to know what a nasty pile of
hairball
Now *that's* worthy of an EW! GROSS!
- Pat (who just just wanted photos of a K7 being washed...)
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Cottycotty...@mac.com wrote:
On 24/7/09, Charles Robinson, discombobulated, unleashed:
The grossest?
You haven't done much exploring out there on the
Just goes to showEven if you give fantastic love and care to your
cat..it doesn't matter.
John Graves
WA1JG
Cotty wrote:
On 24/7/09, Charles Robinson, discombobulated, unleashed:
The grossest?
You haven't done much exploring out there on the Internet, have you?
I try not to read Cotty's posts on a full stomach.
gldnbearz wrote:
Now *that's* worthy of an EW! GROSS!
- Pat (who just just wanted photos of a K7 being washed...)
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Cottycotty...@mac.com wrote:
On 24/7/09, Charles Robinson, discombobulated,
they whom i call Ken Waller wrote:
Now there's a topic for a future PUG - What my cat threw up.
i'll provide a shot of glistening undigested moth abdomens
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit
Man, you're either a cat person or a highly evolved being... I'd treat
Leonidas much like Xerxes... and actually I'd trade my laptop for my K7
(if I had one said K7).
lf
Ralf R. Radermacher escreveu:
Sometime last night, Leonidas, on of our two cats, has thrown up a
hairball. Not exactly
You sure can tell the dog people on this list.:-)
Dave
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 2:20 PM, P. J. Allingwebstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
To quote most any 14 year old girl EEEAAAUUU.
--
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
York
Man, whew. So sorry for your squish in the dark!
Cats prefer to be put out in the evening, and retrieved after the sun
comes up.
Saves much late night or early morning drama.
Left in at night, they will set traps for you, and smother your babies!
:-)
On Jul 24, 2009, at 13:16 , Cotty
Cotty-
I just read that to my cat.
He looked me square in the eye.
And yawned.
Cheers
Beaker
On Jul 24, 2009, at 4:16 PM, Cotty wrote:
On 24/7/09, Charles Robinson, discombobulated, unleashed:
The grossest?
You haven't done much exploring out there on the Internet, have you?
Charles
I'd say the lack of response by the dog people is due to the fact that
we have to pick up shit every day. And vacuum a pound of hair out of
the rug/bed/corners every week.
We don't have (like my sister) kitty litters that automatically comb
the poop out of the litter hourly and put it an a
P.S. I have a cat, so the dogs have something to chase in the yard,
and they bear the scars to prove it!
On Jul 24, 2009, at 17:15 , David J Brooks wrote:
You sure can tell the dog people on this list.:-)
Joseph McAllister
pentax...@mac.com
http://gallery.me.com/jomac
Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
Sometime last night, Leonidas, on of our two cats, has thrown up a
hairball. Not exactly newsworthy, you'd say.
Well, he's done so *after* having a copious meal and on my desk - right
over my new K-7. And I've even been lucky as he missed the open laptop
by a mere
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: K-7, some real-life testing
You sure can tell the dog people on this list.:-)
What ?
Dave
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 2:20 PM, P. J. Allingwebstertwenty
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Joseph McAllister pentax...@mac.com
Subject: Re: K-7, some real-life testing
P.S. I have a cat, so the dogs have something to chase in the yard,
and they bear the scars to prove it!
The dogs?
On Jul 24
and why would you expect us to do that?
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
i'll get it through my other accounts if it works, please ignore.
--
--
The free man owns himself. He can damage himself with either eating or
drinking; he can ruin himself with gambling. If he does he is certainly a damn
i'll get it through my other accounts if it works, please ignore.
--
Godfrey
www.gdgphoto.com
www.flickr.com/photos/gdgphoto
www.twitter.com/godfreydigiorgi
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
Ignored.
:-)
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
http://www.EnticingTheLight.com
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
2009/6/5 Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com:
i'll get it through my other accounts if it works, please ignore.
--
Godfrey
www.gdgphoto.com
On 7/4/09, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
What's this rear view stuff? Do you guys across the pond use them
for looking at derrieres or something? That sounds quite dangerous to
do while driving!
Well you know how we're all obsessed with bottoms.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
Hi everyone,
DA15/4 has arrived and (as it often happens) I have to test it and write
a short review.
Haven't had a chance for real shooting yet, but I decided to compare it
against DA14/2.8 and DA16-50/2.8. Here you can see two comparisons -
ultimate corners and frame centers. I don't say
Forgot to say - all shots are made at maximum aperture, i.e. at f/2.8 or
f/4 depending the lens.
BR, Margus
Margus Männik wrote:
Hi everyone,
DA15/4 has arrived and (as it often happens) I have to test it and
write a short review.
Haven't had a chance for real shooting yet, but I decided
On Apr 9, 2009, at 11:09 AM, Margus Männik wrote:
Forgot to say - all shots are made at maximum aperture, i.e. at f/
2.8 or f/4 depending the lens.
Then I would expect the 15/4 to be the best of the bunch. It's usually
a big quality jump from f2.8 to f4.
BR, Margus
Margus Männik
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist
Subject: Re: Testing again - DA15/4 Limited
On Apr 9, 2009, at 11:09 AM, Margus Männik wrote:
Forgot to say - all shots are made at maximum aperture, i.e. at f/ 2.8 or
f/4 depending the lens.
Then I would expect the 15/4 to be the best
-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Testing again - DA15/4 Limited
Hi everyone,
DA15/4 has arrived and (as it often happens) I have to test it and write
a short review.
Haven't had a chance for real shooting yet, but I decided to compare it
against DA14/2.8 and DA16-50/2.8. Here you can see two comparisons
On Apr 9, 2009, at 11:27 AM, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Paul Stenquist
Subject: Re: Testing again - DA15/4 Limited
On Apr 9, 2009, at 11:09 AM, Margus Männik wrote:
Forgot to say - all shots are made at maximum aperture, i.e. at f/
2.8 or f/4 depending
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Margus Männik [mar...@eol.ee]
Sent: 09 April 2009 16:04
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Testing again - DA15/4 Limited
Hi everyone,
DA15/4 has arrived and (as it often happens) I have to test it and
write
...@eol.ee]
Sent: 09 April 2009 16:04
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Testing again - DA15/4 Limited
Hi everyone,
DA15/4 has arrived and (as it often happens) I have to test it and write
a short review.
Haven't had a chance for real shooting yet, but I decided to compare it
against DA14/2.8
Will,
most likely you will have that chance quite soon. If there's good
weather tomorrow, I'll take those lenses and go shooting. Head to head,
aperture to aperture.
BRM
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Paul Stenquist
Subject: Re: Testing again - DA15/4 Limited
That does surprise me.
John
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Margus Männik
[mar...@eol.ee]
Sent: 09 April 2009 16:48
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Testing again - DA15/4 Limited
Sorry, it's not :)
John
Margus Männik wrote:
Hi everyone,
DA15/4 has arrived and (as it often happens) I have to test it and write
a short review.
Haven't had a chance for real shooting yet, but I decided to compare it
against DA14/2.8 and DA16-50/2.8. Here you can see two comparisons -
ultimate corners and frame
As a matter of fact, the results surprised me as well.
Actual lens orders (from left to right) are:
Corner shot: 15mm - 16-50mm - 14mm
Center shot: 16-50mm - 15mm - 14mm
I shot three doubles in random order and the results were the same every
time. Seems I do have a really good sample of
So the much maligned 16-50 is clearly the best, even at 2.8.
Unexpected but not totally surprising based on my own experience with
the lens.
Paul
On Apr 9, 2009, at 2:50 PM, Margus Männik wrote:
As a matter of fact, the results surprised me as well.
Actual lens orders (from left to right)
to my prime
kit.someday.
John
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Margus Männik
[mar...@eol.ee]
Sent: 09 April 2009 19:50
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Testing again - DA15/4 Limited
As a matter of fact
On 6/4/09, Stan Halpin, discombobulated, unleashed:
Cotty - the videos work fine full screen on my 21 iMac w/ Safari,
10.4.11, no buffering pauses, they look good.
And this is the first time I've looked at the GFM video. Very nice!
Well shot, well edited. Nice sound mixing. Nice cutting in of her
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote:
Hi gang,
Just testing a flash video encoder, any volunteers?
http://www.seeingeye.tv/pages/video.html
less than a minute of dark house fire shots, just need to know if you
can see it :-)
The word Fire on the big red trucks
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi godd...@mac.com
Subject: Re: OT - Video testing
On Apr 7, 2009, at 12:10 PM, Cotty wrote:
What's this rear view stuff? Do you guys across the pond use them
for looking at derrieres
On 7/4/09, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
The word Fire on the big red trucks (sorry, lorries) is backwards.
Here in England our drivers are sensible and use rear view mirrors -I
appreciate that in North America folk like to turn around and have a
good look at what's makin all the
On Apr 7, 2009, at 12:10 PM, Cotty wrote:
What's this rear view stuff? Do you guys across the pond use them
for looking at derrieres or something? That sounds quite dangerous
to
do while driving!
Well you know how we're all obsessed with bottoms.
Driving is always dangerous. Ask the
On Apr 7, 2009, at 11:59 , Cotty wrote:
On 7/4/09, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
The word Fire on the big red trucks (sorry, lorries) is
backwards.
Here in England our drivers are sensible and use rear view mirrors -I
appreciate that in North America folk like to turn around
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote:
Here in England our drivers are sensible and use rear view mirrors -I
appreciate that in North America folk like to turn around and have a
good look at what's makin all the hootin and a hollerin... ;-)
Those are make-up mirrors,
...
stan
On Apr 4, 2009, at 4:45 PM, Cotty wrote:
Thanks to everyone who responded.
For the geekoids amongst you, basically I was testing out a Flash
video
encoder that works as a Quicktime plugin - means I can encode directly
from the Final Cut timeline exporting as an .flv - this is useful
On 4/4/09, Graydon, discombobulated, unleashed:
With firefox-3.0.8-1.fc10.x86_64 and the beta 64 bit linux flash plugin
(libflashplayer-10.0.22.87.linux-x86_64), it works, but I also get the
option of a second video involving singing in what I presume is a school
of some kind.
Thanks mate, I
Hi gang,
Just testing a flash video encoder, any volunteers?
http://www.seeingeye.tv/pages/video.html
less than a minute of dark house fire shots, just need to know if you
can see it :-)
ta.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http
works fine for me
Bob
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On
Behalf Of Cotty
Sent: 04 April 2009 17:52
To: pentax list
Subject: OT - Video testing
Hi gang,
Just testing a flash video encoder, any volunteers?
http
Ditto!
Boris
Bob W wrote:
works fine for me
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Yep, that works.
Cheers,
Dave
2009/4/5 Cotty cotty...@mac.com:
Hi gang,
Just testing a flash video encoder, any volunteers?
http://www.seeingeye.tv/pages/video.html
less than a minute of dark house fire shots, just need to know if you
can see it :-)
ta.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Worked on my end. I feel bad for the folks who lost their home though--gosh,
as if times weren't tough enough already. Christine
- Original Message -
From: Cotty cotty...@mac.com
To: pentax list PDML@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, April 04, 2009 11:52 AM
Subject: OT - Video testing
Hi
In a message dated 4/4/2009 9:52:40 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
cotty...@mac.com writes:
Hi gang,
Just testing a flash video encoder, any volunteers?
http://www.seeingeye.tv/pages/video.html
less than a minute of dark house fire shots, just need to know if you
can see it :-)
ta
Cotty wrote:
Hi gang,
Just testing a flash video encoder, any volunteers?
http://www.seeingeye.tv/pages/video.html
less than a minute of dark house fire shots, just need to know if you
can see it :-)
ta.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
Works on Firefox under Linux... You might have chosen to test
On 4/4/09, Drew, discombobulated, unleashed:
You might have chosen to test it with
a couple of minutes of pole dancing or something though... :-)
Be patient my son.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
No problems here. Tested both Safari and FireFox 3 on Mac OS X 10.5.6,
running on Power Mac G5 2Ghz DP.
G
On Apr 4, 2009, at 9:52 AM, Cotty wrote:
Hi gang,
Just testing a flash video encoder, any volunteers?
http://www.seeingeye.tv/pages/video.html
less than a minute of dark house fire
, Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote:
Hi gang,
Just testing a flash video encoder, any volunteers?
http://www.seeingeye.tv/pages/video.html
less than a minute of dark house fire shots, just need to know if you
can see it :-)
ta.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places
I see it on my Mac with Safari.
Paul
On Apr 4, 2009, at 1:19 PM, Drew wrote:
Cotty wrote:
Hi gang,
Just testing a flash video encoder, any volunteers?
http://www.seeingeye.tv/pages/video.html
less than a minute of dark house fire shots, just need to know if you
can see it :-)
ta.
--
Cheers
Hi Cotty,
It works.
-Pasvorn
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
On 4/4/09, Bob Sullivan, discombobulated, unleashed:
Was that a real fire? We practice on teardowns here, but I don't
think you do many teardowns there do you?
Last Saturday evening in a village ten minutes from me. Thatched cottage
- one of the pitfalls. Sad. I'm afraid I don't know what a
Thanks to everyone who responded.
For the geekoids amongst you, basically I was testing out a Flash video
encoder that works as a Quicktime plugin - means I can encode directly
from the Final Cut timeline exporting as an .flv - this is useful as I
would otherwise have needed an app like Sorenson
Cotty.
Works, but i only get a small screen with the video, like 1x2
Is that correct.??
Dave
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote:
Hi gang,
Just testing a flash video encoder, any volunteers?
http://www.seeingeye.tv/pages/video.html
less than a minute of dark
Cotty,
Teardown are where they take a $200,000/1,200 sq. foot house and
replace it with a much bigger new house on the same lot. The current
economic squeeze will slow that down somewhat, but the houses in the
desirable, close-in suburbs are being redeveloped into 3,000 to 4,500
sq. foot
On 4/4/09, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
Works, but i only get a small screen with the video, like 1x2
Is that correct.??
The screen pixel dimensions are fairly small, but depends on what you
have your monitor resolution set to - the larger the monitor resolution,
the apparent
From: Cotty
Hi gang,
Just testing a flash video encoder, any volunteers?
http://www.seeingeye.tv/pages/video.html
less than a minute of dark house fire shots, just need to know if you
can see it :-)
ta.
I can see 'em.
Mozilla Firefox v.3.0.8; cable internet.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
On Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 06:19:01PM +0100, Drew scripsit:
Cotty wrote:
Just testing a flash video encoder, any volunteers?
http://www.seeingeye.tv/pages/video.html
less than a minute of dark house fire shots, just need to know if you
can see it :-)
Works on Firefox under Linux... You
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Joseph McAllister pentax...@mac.com wrote:
It's the tight shot with the 70 that's blown out.
All of the ones i took are blown out at the settings from the D200. I
had to adjust quite a bit.
Dave
FYI, have you seen and or read this?
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Joseph McAllister pentax...@mac.com wrote:
It's the tight shot with the 70 that's blown out.
FYI, have you seen and or read this?
http://www.pbase.com/cdehaan/image/91881485
I printed out the chart and keep it in my kit for reference, 'cause I can
never
http://web.mac.com/barnyardcam/iWeb/Site/Flash%20comparison.html
Using the K10D and 77ltd and D200 and 18-70, both from the same point,
same settings.
Af 360 on K10D and sb800 on D200.
Huge difference in adding light to shadows,,as seen in the couch
shots, and the shots of Boo in direct sun.
No question: the Nikon flash control is better.
It made the cat disappear in #7282, though. Strange.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
--- On Mon, 1/5/09, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
From: David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com
Subject: Geso More flash testing
To: Pentax
Interesting. But I think the comparison of the cat shots is unfair.
You were much closer to the cat with the Pentax, which in my
experience makes it harder to get balanced flash.
Over all, however, I must agree that in this test and historically,
the Nikon flash (and the firmware that
...@gmail.com
Subject: Geso More flash testing
To: Pentax Discuss pdml@pdml.net, Barbara Brooks bbaro...@gmail.com
Date: Monday, January 5, 2009, 1:10 PM
http://web.mac.com/barnyardcam/iWeb/Site/Flash%20comparison.html
Using the K10D and 77ltd and D200 and 18-70, both from the
same point,
same settings
Both cat shots are from the same location. I probably moved the 18-70
to 50 to get them both in. The tight shot of Boo, is with the 77
Dave
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Joseph McAllister pentax...@mac.com wrote:
Interesting. But I think the comparison of the cat shots is unfair. You were
...@gmail.com
Subject: Geso More flash testing
To: Pentax Discuss pdml@pdml.net, Barbara Brooks bbaro...@gmail.com
Date: Monday, January 5, 2009, 1:10 PM
http://web.mac.com/barnyardcam/iWeb/Site/Flash%20comparison.html
Using the K10D and 77ltd and D200 and 18-70, both from the
same point,
same settings
Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
From: David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com
Subject: Geso More flash testing
To: Pentax Discuss pdml@pdml.net, Barbara Brooks bbaro...@gmail.com
Date: Monday, January 5, 2009, 1:10 PM
http://web.mac.com/barnyardcam/iWeb/Site/Flash%20comparison.html
Using the K10D
going to work at it some more then maybe post--Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com
To: Pentax Discuss pdml@pdml.net; Barbara Brooks bbaro...@gmail.com
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 12:10 PM
Subject: Geso More flash testing
http
is better.
It made the cat disappear in #7282, though. Strange.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
--- On Mon, 1/5/09, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
From: David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com
Subject: Geso More flash testing
To: Pentax Discuss pdml@pdml.net, Barbara Brooks bbaro
It's the tight shot with the 70 that's blown out.
FYI, have you seen and or read this?
http://www.pbase.com/cdehaan/image/91881485
I printed out the chart and keep it in my kit for reference, 'cause I
can never remember all this data for a minute.
Also keep a copy of the text below it in
On Jan 2, 2009, at 3:31 PM, Bob W wrote:
I wonder if JCO has figured out this means he can use his Takumar
lenses on
a digital camera in the way he wants.
Gawds, do you have to curse like that on the list?
G
:o)
I thought you were Gawds...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
I figure Bob W also enjoys swatting hornet's nests with sticks.
That would bee telling.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Am I reading this right? You are saying that for older lenses that
need
stop down metering, the G1 works better than a DSLR viewfinder
because the electronic viewfinder partly compensates for the
stopping down.
Until the light levels get very low, it completely
compensates for
On Jan 2, 2009, at 3:31 PM, Bob W wrote:
I wonder if JCO has figured out this means he can use his Takumar
lenses on
a digital camera in the way he wants.
Gawds, do you have to curse like that on the list?
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Jan 2, 2009, at 20:02, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Jan 2, 2009, at 3:31 PM, Bob W wrote:
I wonder if JCO has figured out this means he can use his Takumar
lenses on
a digital camera in the way he wants.
Gawds, do you have to curse like that on the list?
I figure Bob W also enjoys
Godfrey,
Thanks for all the comments on the G1. I've been reading your
impressions of it, and it seems to me that it would be a great
complement to the M8. When m43 was first announced, I thought I'd wait
for Olympus to come out with something without a viewfinder, with just
a screen, because I
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Juan Buhler juanbuh...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for all the comments on the G1.
Yes, indeed.
I've been reading your impressions of it, and it seems to me that it
would be a great complement to the M8.
Especially since at least two companies have announced
Indeed. Even if I don't really have too many M lenses. At the latest,
as soon as that 20mm 1.7 comes out, I'm getting a m43 camera.
j
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 9:29 PM, sandyinchina sandyinch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Juan Buhler juanbuh...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for
Godfrey DiGiorgi godd...@mac.com wrote in one message:
One of the neat things about using adapted lenses on this camera
is that you can see the actual effect of stopping down the lens live
without the viewfinder getting dark. Exposure system is very
accurate and the MF Assist magnification
On Jan 1, 2009, at 1:27 AM, sandyinchina wrote:
One of the neat things about using adapted lenses on this camera
is that you can see the actual effect of stopping down the lens live
without the viewfinder getting dark. Exposure system is very
accurate and the MF Assist magnification works
-Original Message-
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
(snip)
Until the light levels get very low, it completely compensates for the
stopped down iris. At the limits it gets noisy and eventually gives up
the ghost, but conditions like that would have an optical viewfinder
too dark to see long
On Jan 1, 2009, at 4:44 AM, Anthony Farr wrote:
Until the light levels get very low, it completely compensates for
the
stopped down iris. At the limits it gets noisy and eventually gives
up
the ghost, but conditions like that would have an optical viewfinder
too dark to see long before.
I
On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 5:31 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi godd...@mac.com wrote:
On Jan 1, 2009, at 4:44 AM, Anthony Farr wrote:
Godfrey's comments about the G1's suitability for candid portraiture,
especially restless children, will be interesting.
I have done a little bit of people work with the G1
Is that review online...and is it worth reading?
Not as of todayit was for me as I had no info on it at all.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton bkday...@daytonphoto.com
Subject: Re: testing the G1 ...
Here I am thinking...How
Hi,
I'm just finishing a review of the same camera right at the moment (goes
to our local computer/photo magazine).
About the EVF - unfortunately no, it is NOT true 1.44Mpix. The
viewfinder and TFT-screen both do have 48 /color /image pixels.
Still, it's best EVF I've seen so far.
About the EVF - unfortunately no, it is NOT true 1.44Mpix. The
viewfinder and TFT-screen both do have 48 /color /image pixels.
Still, it's best EVF I've seen so far.
Your comments seem contrary to all the literature written thus far
about the G1.
I haven't used the 14-45 lens very
On Dec 22, 2008, at 9:32 AM, Margus Männik wrote:
The viewfinder and TFT-screen both do have 48 /color /image
pixels. Still, it's best EVF I've seen so far.
Re-read several reviews. That does seem to be the case ... the words
effective 1,440,000 pixels with the field sequential system
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi godd...@mac.com wrote:
About the EVF - unfortunately no, it is NOT true 1.44Mpix. The viewfinder
and TFT-screen both do have 48 /color /image pixels. Still, it's best
EVF I've seen so far.
Your comments seem contrary to all the literature
501 - 600 of 948 matches
Mail list logo
