On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Gary L. Murphy wrote:
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001 22:09:02 -0600, Gary L. Murphy wrote:
Spotted on eBay with a BIN price of, $349.00
Way to go Chris. I'm glad a PDML member got it!
Thanks, Gary! Wow, I can't believe I'm finally getting one of these. Now
I have to learn all
A scroll of mail from Dan Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 13 Mar 2001
14:05:36 -0600
Read it? y
Can you check it out on your end? I can't get your image to load.
Ok, there was some strange problem with my ftp server - wouldn't
accept uploads. I think it's ok now.
dave
Hi Dave,
It works now.
Jerome [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I walked into a bargain MX today, just US $ 90, and it was in a better condition
than the one I have had since 1977. It included a SMC 50mm 1.7 by the way.
That's the best MX deal I've heard of for a long time! I though I
was doing pretty well last year when I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think a lot of folks were complaining that people were making
a minimum bid on items just to kill the Buy It Now feature. I
think I read a post or two from folks here that had been doing
that just because they could.
Len,
I think that I did it once on a rare
,
few weeks ago was up in Ghitzu Mt , excelent view to Fagaras Mt ..shot
just 6 frames with my Spotmatic19frames left on the 24pos Fuji...
firs 3 frames Fagaras mt , Cozia Mt , my friend Ducu - 2 frames
Revinded the film and ...
Last weekend went to Fagaras (Spotmatic was loaned to a
Jon, I have the instructions and can make a copy and send them to you.
Evan Hanson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jon Hope wrote:
Hi all
I managed to find a new flash today. I'm happy, I paid less than a quarter
of it's new price. No box, no instructions, but such is life.
Now,
Ah, but what electronic circuits are you talking about keeping energized all
the time? I doubt anything is energized in the ZX-M except the LCD (which
probably draws as much power as a digital watch), because the meter on the
body does not come on until the shutter is pressed half way down...
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, John Francis wrote:
That's wrong. The second (small) p in PZ-1p stands for 'panoramic'.
That's one of the features that differentiates the PZ-1p from the PZ-1.
So what does the small n in MZ-5n stand for? The two big differences
between MZ-5 and MZ-5n are panorama mode
Gerald ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
[snip]
I've actually got a few Super Takumar lenses that have SMC coatings (but
aren't marked as such).
Hi Gerald,
How is that? Is it by looking at the color of the coating, serial #?
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
-
This message is from the
MZ-5 "new"?
I think so.
Take Ueda, Osaka, Japan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.tripod.co.jp/hayatama/photo/
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the
Hey, welcome to the world of the LX, Chris! You'll never go back. ;)
Albano, get this fella on the body roll call!!
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users'
I don't think it necessary for you to 'preen' them - if possible, just post
them somewhere and put the burden on us the readers.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 1:37 AM
Subject: Re:Old Archive
Gerald Cermak wrote:
I had a new ZX-5n that did this from the very first roll, and I
eventually found a little imperfection in the surface between the shutter
area and the take up spool.
Once at Sterling we had an MZ-10 that scratched consistently.
Eventually the culprit was discovered
A scroll of mail from Dan Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 14 Mar 2001
06:08:34 -0600
Read it? y
It works now. Those are definitely some eyes. g I'm glad you didn't move
in for an 'up the nostrils' shot.
Is the flare on the lefthand side a scanner artifact?
Yep, the scanning glass of my scanner
Tom Rittenhouse wrote:
Gee, Aaron, I am always willing to give a home to unwanted
lenses.
Just because it's crap doesn't mean I can /give/ it away. ;)
If I ran a business like that, I'd lose a shedload of money every time a
shipment of TMax came in!
-Aaron
-
This message is from the
150/3.5K: $41 EX, $105 EX+, $126 LN, all at KEH (1999 or 2000)
150/3.5M: $100 Photoworld, 04MAR01
Paul Franklin Stregevsky
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
W: (703) 834-4648
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions.
Chris Brogden wrote:
Let's smash things up!
S, wait until you KNOW he's gone, otherwise he might stick around.
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users'
A scroll of mail from Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 14
Mar 2001 08:24:44 -0800
Read it? y
Anyone seen the Monty Python sketch with several men sitting
around trying to out-do each other with stories about how tough
they used to have it?
"Now when *I* was a young man..."
The sketch is
Mark Roberts wrote:
Anyone seen the Monty Python sketch with several men sitting
around trying to out-do each other with stories about how tough
they used to have it?
"Now when *I* was a young man..."
"We had to clean the entire lake with our tongues!"
-Aaron
-
This message is from the
Hi all,
Best shot I missed recently had to be from a couple months ago. It was
about 10:00 or 11:00 PM on a weeknight, and the full moon was well above the
horizon -- perhaps 40 or 50 degrees? Anyway, our region was blanketed by a
cold, dry air mass, and there was a very thin veil of cirrus
A professor once told his class, "Every time a new book comes out, I read
two old ones."
For those of us for whom photography is, in part, a tactile experience, his
remark might be adapted to:
"Every time a new [non-Limited] prime comes out, I buy two old ones."
---
Is
I'm considering buying a Berlebach 7003 wood tripod as my lightweigth tripod (I
already have a Manfrotto 055Nat and a Gitzo 505). For this tripod I need a suitable
pan/tilt head. Choices are the Manfrotto 460MG Junior Magnesium or the 329 Pro
Compact. The magnesium head is of course the best
Pieter wrote:
MZ-5 "new"?
Yes.
Pl
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Boz wrote:
Does anyone know if the FA* 300/2,8 features an AF/MF clutch mechanism?
As far as I know, all FA* lenses have this sliding MF/AF clutch mechanism.
Pl
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions.
Albano, get this fella on the body roll call!!
-Aaron
Yes, it will be included in next roll call. But I think I also have a pair of
MXs to add...
:-)
Albano (with just one body, LX)
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the
Oh OK, you are talking ALL screw-mount My mistake
ppro
-Original Message-
From: Kelvin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 11:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Raymond Chan; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Hi kelvin,
H - There are quite a number of places:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spotmatic
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spotmatic
http://venus.beseen.com/boardroom/h/17621/Date
http://venus.beseen.com/boardroom/h/17621/Date
Just to name a few...
ppro
Paul M. Provencher, Senior
Chris Brogden wrote:
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
I'd give it to my Dad to shoot with, but what's he done to me to
deserve such an awful lens?
Not bought an LX? :)
I hate to say this...but I don't think my Dad needs an LX. Actually, I
think he'd be really really
I recently finished reading The Honeywell Pentax Way: The Pentax
Photographer's Companion, by Popular Photography's Herb Keppler (First
Edition, 1966; Focal Press, Inc.). Written in the screwmount glory days, it
offers a wealth of practical advice for any SLR photographer, with an
emphasis on
When the Minolta Maxuum was introduced, an ex-girlfriend bought one and
asked me to photograph her wedding with it. I had never used an SLR, so I
borrowed the Maxuum to become acquainted with its operation. The exposure
counter counted to 38...but the film had failed to catch on the takeup
reel.
Hey folks, IR is fun and quite easy, the second challenge is UV...
anyone tried to play with UV
Normal lenses are around 360nm
UV 320nm would be fun
very few lenses go to 215nm
what lense would go down to 200nm ?
Also anyone know a mirror lenses without Refracting elements ?
How to build a
A scroll of mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 14 Mar 2001
07:37:23 GMT
Read it? y
I may be able to preen them, by removing "Non Interesting" threads !!!
Though this could take a while, I started one last year but gave up !
How big are the archives? It may be possible for people to split them
See a set of photos of what may be the first time a 77mm Limited lens has
been mounted onto a Spotmatic.
It is both on a SPII and Spotmatic F
put this in your web browser:
ftp://tiger.reilytexas.com/spotcollage.jpg
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
At 21:54 14/03/01, you wrote:
Jon, I have the instructions and can make a copy and send them to you.
Thanks for the offer, Evan. I have organised a set of instructions from the
local distributor. I should get them on the morrow.
Cheers
Jon
Relax! Take life as it comes, you can't chase the
Yep - thats the one - I read the description so that it is indeed the post-war
version of the 1936 lens - here pictured in Pentacon 6 mount - i.e. that the lenses
are different versions of the original Olympia Sonnar. I have never seen the original
"live", only in pictures. The price for the
If you're just looking to scan in some pics for online use:
=
UMAX Astra 2100U for $10 after rebate
-
Matched on subscription to category "peripherals"
Insight.com has renewed its stock of the UMAX Astra 2100U
flatbed scanner for $39.99, as a
I would like to know how much PDML members are ready to pay for a second
hand LX ?
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
Thanks muchly for the Pacific Rim lead...They actually
had 2 in stock, one of which they are sending to me
today!
Cheers...Bob
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1221572847
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.
To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net
Philippe Trottier wrote:
Hey folks, IR is fun and quite easy, the second challenge is UV...
anyone tried to play with UV
Yes, but I haven't had much luck with it yet.
(Getting ahold of a filter that reduces visible light
but _passes_ UV would probably help with the things
I was trying to
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1220256947
(Cord Camera here in Columbus)
Anniversary model -- red leather gold trim.
Now sitting at only $2,700.
Usually sell for $4k and up.
I've seen it. It's nice.
***
"The accumulation of all powers legislative,
executive
I bought mine used in need of repair for $330 + 8.6% tax, paid Pentax USA
another ~$150 for a CLA. So my total was around $500 (no lens, no strap, no
case). Another $75 to BH for a new LX leather case, but I am still looking
for an LX strap. It was well worth it. It is my most used body in
Steve Larson asks:
Gerald ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I've actually got a few Super Takumar lenses that have SMC coatings (but
aren't marked as such).
How is that? Is it by looking at the color of the coating, serial #?
Yes, and by knowing that the production serial numbers were late
Somebody knows the aprox. f stop number of a body-cap-pinhole- ens? It's more
than 90, I suppose...
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at
Destruction of Buddah's in Afghanistan; send your e-mail to the Afghanistan
Government at:
http://www.afghangovernment.org/
Amazing pictures at photo journalist's site:
http://www.ciriello.com/
I sent the Afghanis this message:
I find the Taliban's destruction of world cultural heritage
check out:
http://www.pinholeresource.com/products.html#bodycap
D
From: "Gerald Cermak" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 11:04:44 -0800
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: UV lenses ??? pin hole lense ???
Philippe Trottier write:
I was thinking to
Update: the price is now $59.99 before rebate, $29.99 after.
- Original Message -
From: "Delano Mireles" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 9:43 AM
Subject: OT: For those looking for a cheap scanner
If you're just looking to scan in some pics for
You are all to be on your best behavior.
It's Friday! ;-)
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have experienced this exact problem as well with an occasional roll of
slide film in my PZ-1p. I would also like to know the cause. Anyone know?
It can be a practically invisible piece of dirt somewhere in the film
path of your camera, or an equally small piece
Woodmere Camera was offering one earlier this month in condition 9+ for
$349, Earlier, Woodmere sold one in "perfect" condition for $399.
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 10:45:01 -0600 (CST)
From: Chris Brogden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: K30/2.8 sold for $250
Like the subject line says, the K30/2.8
Can anyone recommend a free or cheap Web-hosting site? I'd like to put a few
pictures up for other people to see. What are the pros and cons of selecting
a host?
Thanks,
JJ
J. John Cohen, M.D., Ph.D.
Department of Immunology, B-184
University of Colorado Medical School
Denver, CO 80262, USA
Chris,
If you load the film corrctly in a newer AF camera, but later the film
comes off the takeup spool, how do you know?
--
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 10:35:08 -0600 (CST)
From: Chris Brogden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Best shot you _know_ you missed (WAS: What do
Hi Philippe,
I haven't tried taking photographs at these wavelengths, but I've had lots
of experience with pulsed UV lasers and low-level UV and VUV (vacuum UV --
below 200 nm) photometry/spectroscopy. For UV, you need fused silica
optics. Much more expensive than BK-7 or BAK-4 glass.
A dealer in Sweden currently has for sale a number of Pentax and compatible
K-mount lenses that you don't see everyday. I must state, however, that
another list member felt that a lens whose condition this dealer had rated
as A, wasn't.
http://home.swipnet.se/~w-39670/lager.html#pentax
Exchange
Dr. John ;),
I use http://www.hostsmart.com to host my kids' site. I register my domains
at http://www.directnic.com -- hosting is $4.95/mo for 20MB and domain is
$15/yr.
I've never had problems with hostsmart. I believe that directnic will host
up to 20MB with them for free if you
The "n" denotes a host of "new" ergonomic improvements, which were
enthusiastically detailed in words and photographs in Popular Photography.
Also, wasn't spot metering missing from the original MZ-5?
--
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 16:10:39 +0200 (SAST)
From: Pieter Nagel
The commercial ones I saw today (@ Midwest Photo)
had a practical f value of 1:120
***
"The accumulation of all powers legislative,
executive and judiciary in the same hands . . .
may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny."
--James Madison, Federalist 47
-
This
I just called my lab. I just started using them, since I'm fairly new in
town. They use the dip and dunk method, which most likely puts the onus on
my camera.
I actually prefer it this way because I believe the lab to be the best in
town, and if it was them I'd feel like I was up the creek.
aimcompute wrote:
I actually prefer it this way because I believe the lab to be the best in
town, and if it was them I'd feel like I was up the creek.
Good labs occasionally screw up too.
I suspect you had a dirty lint trap. I've seen it happen a few times
since I've been processing my own
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1220252143
Will somebody please UN-enable me?
Though what I really wanted was the lens and I plan to sell the body (I'll
just keep telling myself that. Yeah, that's it).
David
Who only owned a PZ1-p and a Ricoh XR-X3p, and a half-dozen
Hi,
this obviously depends on condition and on the local market. Here in
the UK they generally sell for upwards of 350-. The cheapest I ever
saw was 250-, but the condition was so poor that I wouldn't have even
considered it.
I used to own 3, and the most I paid was slightly over 450-. You have
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris,
If you load the film corrctly in a newer AF camera, but later the film
comes off the takeup spool, how do you know?
I believe the whole "is it winding properly" detection logic in
modern automated-film-transport cameras (nothing to do with AF)
is based on
aimcompute writes regarding scratched film:
Makes me wanna zip a roll of Kodak thru it everytime just before I load
the
Fuji so I can make sure it's clean. G
I actually found my film scratcher in my camera using this method. I bought
a $1.49 roll of Gold 100, ran it through the camera enough
Hi,
I think you've sent it to the wrong people. The Taleban are not the
internationally recognised government. The web site whose url you
provided looks as though it is the site of the official government or
at least the government in exile.
---
Bob
mailto:[EMAIL
Whats a reasonable used price of a near mint A 2X-L converter?
Pl
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Gerald Cermak wrote:
By a used helicoid extension, mount a body cap to the front that is drilled
to hold the pinhole. Viola! A pinhole zoom!
Gerald
You are a deeply disturbed individual. Keep it up!
(I love the idea of 'drilled to hold the pinhole', too!)
--
John Francis [EMAIL
Here's the summary from Bodies Roll Call 69. --henry
Total bodies. 1378
Members who responded. 344
Bodies/person 4.01
= Mount Families
- Pre-M425
- M42..224
- K,
Philippe Trottier wrote:
What kind of mirror should be used for UV purpose ?
Pretty much anything that reflects visible light; typical metallized
coatings reflect deep enough into the UV spectrum for your purposes.
Just make sure you get a front-surface mirror, though; the glass of
a
Skip,
You may be right, there may be no current drain on the battery. I don't
know for certain. I based my assumption on my past experience with the
MESuper and my battery operated analyzers and laptops which drain the
battery much faster while in standby mode than when off. I should have
Ha - That's pretty amazing Gerald. And all my life I wonder why people
can't tell if I'm joking or not!
Thanks for telling me that - I'm going to try this next time.
Mafud would be having a fit right now, wouldn't he? g
Tom C.
- Original Message -
From: "Gerald Cermak" [EMAIL
Hi Phillipe,
If you need lenses for UV photography, Nikon makes a pair of them. They
are the 50 mm. f/4.5 and 105 mm. f/2.8 UV-Nikkor.
Of course, you will need a Nikon body to use them. Besides, they say
these lenses are quite fragile, because they are made of fluorite and
quartz glass. And I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, wasn't spot metering missing from the original MZ-5?
No, the original MZ-5 also has spot metering, apart from multi-segment
and centre-weighted.
--
Carlos Royo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Zaragoza (Aragon) -
[I wonder how I managed to screw this completely up]
Its supposed to be reasonable price for an A 2X-S converter (not 2X-Z or 2X-L)
Pl
- Original Message -
From: "Pl Jensen" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 9:44 PM
Subject: Price of Pentax-A
"David P. Chernicoff" wrote:
and a large collection of lenses and accessories (winders, databacks,
hoods, filters etc.) Though I've managed to avoid $1000+ telephoto primes.
Just wait till you get a hankering for those $1000+ zooms, too!
In the last couple of years I've enabled my collection
Gerald Cermak wrote:
I actually found my film scratcher in my camera using this method. I bought
a $1.49 roll of Gold 100, ran it through the camera enough frames to where I
know the problem would occur, opened the back without rewinding, and was
able to see the scratch on the undeveloped
Hi Philippe,
My comments are interspersed below. Hope these help.
Any lead where to talk and ask for these "toys" I know they
are expensive...
Edmund Industrial Optics (http://www.edmundoptics.com) now carries UV
optics. Simple planoconvex and biconvex lenses are available for around USD
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 9:23 PM
Subject: Uncommon K-mount lenses for sale (Sweden)
A dealer in Sweden currently has for sale a number of Pentax and compatible
K-mount lenses that you don't see everyday. I
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: March 14, 2001 12:45 PM
Subject: 330FTZ on LX
Hi, gang.
AFAIK, digital flashes are not compatible with analog bodies.
I just want to
confirm this, because a friend who has a MZ 7, bought a 330
flash, and I was
- Original Message -
From: "aimcompute"
Subject: Re: Scratches on Film
I just called my lab. I just started using them, since I'm
fairly new in
town. They use the dip and dunk method, which most likely
puts the onus on
my camera.
It could also be the slide mounter, presuming you
- Original Message -
From: "Cameron Hood" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: March 14, 2001 1:27 PM
Subject: OT: Send a message to these morons
Destruction of Buddah's in Afghanistan; send your e-mail to
the Afghanistan
Government at: snipped
I sent the Afghanis this
- Original Message -
From: "Pentax Clover" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: March 14, 2001 12:34 PM
Subject: how much are you ready to pay for a LX ?
I would like to know how much PDML members are ready to pay
for a second
hand LX ?
I bought two last year, both old
My 200mm macro is an f4.0
Exact name - SMC Pentax-A* Macro 1:4 200mm ED, with the star in green, all
other letters/numerals white.
Ken Waller
- Original Message -
From: Bojidar Dimitrov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 5:26 AM
Why can't the camera be designed to lock the shutter if the film breaks?
That way, it's not up to you to notice the Error display. DOES the shutter
lock? If so, that would make me feel much better about moving to a modern
camera.
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 12:48:35 -0800
From: John Francis [EMAIL
On 14 Mar 2001, at 19:34, Pentax Clover wrote:
I would like to know how much PDML members are ready to pay for a second
hand LX ?
Someone just took one off my hands for US$510, see:
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1219523882
Cheers,
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Dave,
When you do figure out if you want to sell that LX or not, let me
know how it works and what you want for it. I might be willing to allow
you to enable me, thus helping to UN-enable you ;)
Illinois Bill
"David P. Chernicoff" wrote:
I have an ME super which gives me problems only if I switch it off. The
LEDs flicker (different pattern to the low battery flicker) and I get
occasional mechanical shutter (125th) rather than the indicated speed.
Problem goes away if I leave it switched on all the time (even in bag) and
I've
Please - let's not discuss politics on this list. There are other views
even on this issue.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Cameron Hood" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 1:27 PM
Subject: OT: Send a message to these morons
| Destruction of
Just a quick one - an MX and winder, plus 50mm f1.2 'as new' lurking
under a generic 'pentax camera' subject line.
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1222073605
Cheers,
Cotty
___
Cotty's MacAds - free UK
[...]
guys: the Leica M is the Spotmatic of the Gods. If you learn on this
stuff, you're going to learn photography. Most ultra-wealthy beginners
shell out for a complete EOS or F5 system, turn it on auto-pilot, and use it
as a point-and-shoot.
[...]
I just thought it was funny,
j
--
Brian wrote:
On 14 Mar 2001, at 13:43, John Francis wrote:
In the last couple of years I've enabled my collection with, (in order),
the 80-200/2.8, a (manual focus) 300/2.8 + 1.4L, and the 250-600/5.6
that's a lot of enablement (is that a word?)
Well, the really big deal was enabled
John Francis wrote:
Well, the really big deal was enabled by a PDML posting.
Bill Owens wrote:
For someone with a lot more money than I've got, here is a listing direct
from the Charlotte Camera website:
250-600 5.6 IF ED FA with filters
and case, RARE FIND!
The slides are indeed mounted. I'm going to give the camera a thorough
going over when I use the roll that's in it. Salmon way or another I'll
figure out the problem.
Tom C.
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14,
On Wed, 14 Mar 2001 21:44:12 +0100, you wrote:
Whats a reasonable used price of a near mint A 2X-L converter?
Pl
I got one a year ago for a little less than $150 US. Another recently
sold on Ebay for about $150.
I often see them selling for $225 and up.
If I were still in the market for one,
Hi,
Unfortunately, it is their country, and their artifacts. They
are within their rights to do what they are doing.
William Robb
in fact they are not within their rights. The Taleban are not the
legitimate government of Afghanistan. Even if they were, Afghanistan
is part of the UN and has
John
If you dont want to set up a web site but just want to share your pictures
on the web then these people will let you store up to 50Mb of photos for
free. You could always do multiple registrations if that werent enough -
but I didnt suggest that did I.
Steve Cottrell wrote:
Just a quick one - an MX and winder, plus 50mm f1.2 'as new' lurking
under a generic 'pentax camera' subject line.
The seller calls it the f1:2 (i.e. the f2.0), not the f1.2.
The lens shown in the photograph certainly only looks like the f2.
But an MX in reasonably
tom wrote:
John Francis wrote:
Well, the really big deal was enabled by a PDML posting . . .
I think the same post netted me an FA 85/1.4, FA 28-70/2.8 and PZ-1p.
That was a later post, but from the same collection.
I believe another PDML member picked up an 80-200/2.8
I still
Pentax Clover wrote:
I would like to know how much PDML members are ready to
pay for a second hand LX ?
I bought mine through ebay at around USD400. Here in Japan,
the used market for an LX is still very vivid. The
cheapest I ever saw was JPY60,000 (USD500), and many will
go up as high as
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001 22:49:19 -0600 (CST), Chris Brogden wrote:
Thanks, Gary! Wow, I can't believe I'm finally getting one of these. Now
I have to learn all about them and resist buying accessories, all at the
same time. :) Of course, I only bought it to keep Aaron
happy. Wh! Thanks
On Wed, 14 Mar 2001 06:04:59 -0600, Dan Scott wrote:
Congratulations Chris! And that was an excellent "Heads Up" Gary. G
Yeah, sometimes I amaze myself at what I can come up with that late at night! :-)
Later,
Gary
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001 20:36:05 -0800, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Good call, Gary ... and one of our own grabbed it.
I'm really happy for Chris. My only regret is that I wish I could have been the one,
but right now, that wasn't an
option :-(
Later,
Gary
-
This message is from the
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
