Sid Barras wrote:
snip
Facit - Green, Red, Yellow and Blue
Gorgeous. Are these colors true, or did photoshop help the superb
saturation?
Thanks, Sid.
I forgot to mention I used a linear polarizer filter; forgive me, the shot
was taken almost eight years ago, on May '94 - southern fall.
On 1 Jan 2002 at 1:50, Matamoros, Cesar A. wrote:
I wonder how the LX owners will react. Just remember that
underneath the new skins they are still an LX ;-) Seeing my original with
in White Cobra I really noticed how worn the camera is, still does not deter me
from taking it out whenever
Cotty - Red Tree
If landscapes are not in your repertoire, then they should be. This is
a top flight photo!
Thanks for your obviously sincere and kind words, Sid. The thing is, when
I phoyograph something like a tree, I feel I should be sat there behind a
huge wooden 10X8 inch plate
Hey who's running this? You, or me? Besides, it was a digital printer
challenge, not an inkjet printer challenge. Furthermore, according to the
rules, which I made up, I am the final authority on the prize winners. ;-)
The Dye-Sub print will be winging it's way to you for 2002!!!
Maybe you
Hi Tom.Just kidding of coarse.I'm going to make
a New Years resolution,something i have not done
in years,take at least 1 non horsey picture per roll
during show season and use the D1 for some artsy fartsy
shots as well.
Thanks again for doing this.I was fun.
Dave
Begin Original Message
Tom Rittenhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I kind of like the one on top. The one with the black
leatherette.
LOL!
I was writing just the same!
Gianfranco
PS: César, don't you listen to us defeatists... If you like the
new skin, and it makes you love and use your LXs even more, it's
all good.
Snip
But what is someone to do who has, say, a 135/1.8 PKA*, two of which
fetched $1800 and $1,810 in mid 2001? I don't think any of us at PDML could
come up with that kind of money without risking divorce. Should the seller
ask $1,200 and cheat himself of $600? Or should he say, If anyone on
As the seller of this lens, I assure you that there
was no communicationbetween gabriel and myself...etc,
etc...
I have been away from the list for a couple of weeks,
so when I got back and read the posts concerning the
availability of future ebay auction items prior to
their being listed, I felt
Those were not your original statement as quoted here.
For those who have not been following this Challenge, it all started
when I told someone on the list I had never seen an inkjet print that I
though matched a photographic print. He said I had not seen one of his. I
replied, send me one.
Hi Tom,
How did you arrive at this conclusion? What's the math behind it?
Might be worthwhile to know.
Tom Rittenhouse wrote:
My calculator says a 9x9 negative requires a 12.8cm diameter coverage. I
don't believe a their comdenser head 23C can cover that. A 6x9 image requirs
10.8, so to
Thanks, Tom. Ed also suggested something similar. Since it's a cheap
and readily available solution, I'll try that first. The technique
should at least indicate if there's a need to go further. Of course, if
there's a problem with the lens, which may give an unsharp image on one
side or
On 1 Jan 2002 at 1:50, Matamoros, Cesar A. wrote:
I wonder how the LX owners will react. Just remember that
underneath the new skins they are still an LX ;-) Seeing my original
with
in White Cobra I really noticed how worn the camera is, still does not
deter me
from taking it out
My first SLR was a Nikkormat, in 1968. I had two lenses, a 50/2 and the
older 105/2.5 discussed here. The 105 was used for about 75% of all shots I
took. I switched from the Nikkormat to an OM-1 for smaller size and hoped
for better metering. My biggest regret was giving up that 105. Truly one of
Hi Malcom
There was an article in the October, 1999 issue of Practical Photography
that showed, very specifically, how to set up a darkroom in a small
bathroom. The idea behind the setup was that it had to be easily broken
down, easy to set up, and inexpensive. If you can find a copy of
It's lovely, Kathleen. You have a good eye.
Joe
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
I agree. I would have liked it had the LX been redone in some different
color, just as Hasselblad is doing with some of its cameras.
Jim A.
From: Robert Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2002 03:48:51 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Newly
Very lovely, Rob. A nice composition. Well worth rising early.
Joe
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Rose, by Piper Causey Lehman
A Rose is a Rose, by Bill Owens
Gardenia - Early Sunday Morning, by Brent Hutto
Glow, by D. Glenn Arthur Jr. (perhaps my favorite this month; nicely
done)
A Bug's Life, by Don Cohn.
I definitely like good flower photos.
Happy New Year, everyone.
Joe
-
This
Thanks Frank. It makes me blush when people go on about my photographs like
that. I recently re-scanned the slide with a real scanner (HP PhotoSmart)
and it is sharp enough to see bark detail in the trees. As for the colors:
I think what I got was a combination of beautiful natural colors
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Johan,
Stalin Organ? You'll have to enlighten me on that one!
Must be `Stalin's Organ'. It is an array of grenade/rocket launchers.
The original one used to launch Katyusha rockets during World War II.
--
http://members.chello.nl/~j.schoone
Thanks Tom. I think my next enlarger should be capable of 4x5, since I
occasionally shoot with my old Speed Graphic, and I want a cold light head.
I've been spoiled ever since I put a Zone VI cold light head on my
little Omega
B-22. Rich. Nice. I like it.
I might just go with another
A K-mount 1000/8 lens went up on ebay. (This is not a reflex.) No buy it
now, so we'll have to wait.
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1316793311
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't
Thank you. He's one of a kind.
Dan Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
UniqueToo Wrote:
My Old Man, Dan Scott-
Great shot! It appears you have managed to capture the true man, this is not
some studio shot. I really like people pictures who mange to show more
than perfection.
-
This message is from the
- Original Message -
From: Tom Rittenhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 4:01 AM
Subject: Re: Questions for Beseler 23CII Users
My calculator says a 9x9 negative requires a 12.8cm diameter
coverage. I
don't believe a their comdenser head 23C
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 10:16 AM
Subject: Re: Questions for Beseler 23CII Users
Hi Tom,
How did you arrive at this conclusion? What's the math behind
it?
Might be worthwhile to know.
Basic
OK, I understand the math ... but what is the diffuser? How do I
measure it? Where do I find it?
William Robb wrote:
Basic geometery. The size of the diffuser needs to be somewhat
bigger than the diagonal of the negative.
As an example, the 35mm format is nominally 24x36mm.
To get the
On 31 Dec 2001 at 18:46, Ed Mathews wrote:
Sorry that this is referring to a Nikkor, but this makes a real
interesting read for anybody interested in bokeh:
http://www.nikon.co.jp/main/eng/society/nikkor/n05_e.htm
Hi Ed,
It just goes to show how personal the interpretation of the quality
For those of you seeking a bit of insanity, I've posted a few pics up of
a little reflector mod I did for my AF280T flash. It allows a bit of fill
when bouncing off a ceiling.
http://www.macads.co.uk/pentax/
and navigate on the left...
Cheers and a very happy new year to you all - I
I second the great paper motion. Once I discovered it I
never printed
stuff to show in anything else. Nice cool whites. have a
blast, Shel!
annsan
Ed Mathews wrote:
Shel,
That's some of the best paper ever made. Ansel was fond of it.
Just 2 days ago I printed an 11x14 on old
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: Re: Questions for Beseler 23CII Users
OK, I understand the math ... but what is the diffuser? How
do I
measure it? Where do I find it?
On a colour head, the diffuser is the white plastic or opal
glass that sits just above the
They look distinctive and different but I prefer the original black and have no
desire to change mine. I am also not sure that I would want to bid on an LX
with that appearance if it was on ebay.
David S.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
Cesar,
Where did you get the new skin kits from? I have an LX whose skin is coming
off, and wouldn't mind getting a new 'look' for it.
Illinois Bill
Matamoros, Cesar A. wrote:
It is finally time for me to comment on my Pentax Christmas,
basically because it occurred after the
Can we have a list of losing printers so we can know what the winners'
competition was like?
Were there any dye sub printers in the mix?
My wife's Epson 1270 does a great job for inkjet (much better than my
Canon BJC-5100), but even she agrees my (our) P-400's output is truly
amazing compared
Good idea, Cotty. I'm going to rig one for my AF 400T. With my LX I use a
reflector umbrella and turn the flash backwards in its bracket. That's fine
with TTL metering. However, with my 6x7, I have to use manual exposure
(Mafud would approve) if I use the reflector, since there's no TTL of course
Excellent, Cotty. I'm off to raid the recycling bin. :-)
Dan Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For those of you seeking a bit of insanity, I've posted a few pics up of
a little reflector mod I did for my AF280T flash. It allows a bit of fill
when bouncing off a ceiling.
Looks like it is a screw mount that come with an adapter...
Brendan
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
I'd like to see some comparisons of inket and dye sub. I've heard that the
colors bleed on dye subs. Perhaps that's old information? In any case, I'd
like to learn more before I buy my next printer. (My Epson 1200 has printed
several hundred big prints and perhaps a thousand homework papers. It's
But is says Pentax on the lens. I thought it would be screw mount if it
says SMC Takumar instead of Pentax.
Jim A.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 15:09:32 EST
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SMC Pentax 1000/8 on ebay.
Looks like it is a
The best website that I have seen for a Pentax 67 owners manual for sale is
on Ebay. If you are looking for a parts manual and such I would also check
on ebay. I have owned a Ppentax 6x7 since the 70's. Is there anything I
could help you with?
Jody
- Original Message -
From: J. C.
Hey Paul - sounds like you had some fun. I hope you enjoy the new lens at
such a great price. I started with a 90mm (leaf shutter) lens with my
system because I like a slightly wide angle for my normal lens but I think
you should enjoy your 105mm (nice fast lens too). Do you know what
Why should you appologise? Actually, I like to think that we at least have a
chance to get it cheaper off of ebay than if we gave you an honest price for
it grin. No matter what one does, someone is going to not like it.
Ciao,
graywolf
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Bob
NEW YEAR
Ciao,
graywolf
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Cool and funky, man! Especially the White Cobra.
Pat White
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
If you think about it for a moment, Shel, it is obvious that the diameter of
the circle of illumination needs to be equal to the diagonal of the
negative. Going back to HS geometry, the sum of the square of the two sides
is equal to the square of the hypotenuse. I could have used trig, but the
Hello everyone,
I just found out that my sister still has all of her BW developing equipment
and enlarger sitting in my parents closet at home. Since I live in an
apartment (with my girlfriend), I want to start slowly and try processing some
rolls of Tri-X 400 in our bathroom. Miracously, my
Very true. And why should we expect anyone to settle for less
than the best price he can get for his stuff? Personally, I
know the max price I can afford to offer for the stuff I want to
buy, and that's as high as I will go. That's why I don't have a
whole lot of items behind my eBay ID. I
Just lovely. What colors.
How sharp are enlargements from this lens?
Joe
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
I acquired my A 400mm/f5.6 that way. My bid was the highest, but didn't meet
the reserve. The owner contacted me and told me he would be willing to sell
it for the reserve, which was only $24 above my max bid. I accepted, also
because it was a shop rather then a private person, with lots of
I like how this photo shows the absolute sharpness of this lens.
Joe
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
On 1 Jan 2002 at 17:52, Ed Mathews wrote:
It is very personal indeed. I found the bokeh on all the shots to be
very pretty, and very similar to what I get with the 77 F1.8 Ltd.
Highlights take on a very distinct and recognizable circular pattern.
Hi Ed,
Ok, my favourite lenses produce an
Joseph Tainter wrote:
Lovely, Ann. I know this spot. You have truly captured what passes for
weather in New Mexico.
Joe
-
Thanks, Joseph - I'm glad I was there at that precise
moment.. I got some
fun stuff in Pie Town too, but the beautiful light in that
area kept me from getting
to the
Doug Brewer wrote:
Happy New Year, y'all.
Doug
--
annsan metoos (so lazy!)
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
We'll have to talk about speed graphics sometime, Paul. We seem to be the
only ones who still use them. Do you use yours as a press camera, or as a
view camera?
The reason the old Beselers sell for more than the old Omegas is because the
accessories are interchangeable with the new ones. The
In awarding the prizes aesthetics were considered. They were not for rating
the printers. So, because they won it does not mean other printers did not
print every bit as well, or even better.
No, there were no dye subs. There was only one HP, and the one Xerox, the
rest were Epsons and Canons.
If your printer is not on this list, or you think you can do better, please
send me a print so I can add it to the ratings (address at end of post).
Even prints from your older printer are useful.. I, for one, would like to
know if better quality is possible from my existing printer than I am
'Cept that don't work with a Beseler condenser head. The Beseler moves the
negative stage up and down the cone of light until it just covers the
negative area. The enlarger works pretty well if you have the neg higher up
than optimum but you lose some light intensity, if the neg is to lower it
Actually basic HTML is not hard to learn. You don't get all those wonderful
features that you get with a web page design program tough. You know, the
ones that make the page almost impossible to read g
Ciao,
graywolf
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: aimcompute [EMAIL
Hi Kevin,
Glad it all works okay..
A couple of weeks after i got mine i fumbled it with an FA*24/2 attached,
flew out of my hands and one of my friends managed to catch it :) I was
standing on a tiled floor too.
Regards,
Paul
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Waterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yeah, I know. I have done some, but after 20 years of doing software
development and coding, for some strange reason I have no desire to do it in
my spare time!!! Can you believe that?
I'd rather have a fairly easy powerful tool so that, in the end, I
concentrate more time and energy on
I tried to find out who these guys were from a couple of
likely candidates among my new york friends but so far
people just keep saying that these guys look familiar
I bought the picture at the Sal Army for the frame and
glass.
Obviously, I didnt take the pic ;-)
Hi Rob,
I have a shot taken with the 77/1.8 in this month's PUG,
http://pug.komkon.org/02jan/dad.html .
Bokeh is decent, I think. The three highlights in the upper left are
reflections on the window from some lights to the far right, and the
horizontals and verticals are aluminum bar stock and
Do they have these for those junky plasticky PZ-1p's? :-)
The K1000 looks pretty nice in tan lizard skin.
Tom C.
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: William Kane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 2:54 PM
Subject: Re:
The guy in the orange hat is one of the VJs, I think. The other guy doesn't
ring a bell for me.
Dan Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I tried to find out who these guys were from a couple of
likely candidates among my new york friends but so far
people just keep saying that these guys look familiar
I
I use Dreamweaver. It's powerful and it creates
the cleanest code of all the WYSIWIG tools. But I
think it retails for $300. It comes bundled with
Homesite, a code editor, but it has a little code
editor built in. Its code for Javascript rollovers
and such is bulky, but functional. Dreamweaver's
The only problem in this whole thing is that you are the only
person that gets to see all of the prints. All the submitters
get to see are their own prints. Not that you aren't a good
judge, only that quality, like bokeh and beauty, are in the eye
of the beholder. Two or three more judges
Someone thought it was Carson Daly, but
I thought he was taller and certainly better looking :)
Does it look to you like it has been phonied? or a
good shot of the twirling rope?
IT might help to have a teenager to show this to ;)
thanks for taking a stab at it, Dan
ann
Dan Scott wrote:
One question before i drink the rest of the bleach
out of the bottle,how far over the top of the flash is your
overhang.Looks about 2 1/2 inches or so
God this stuff taste bad
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: Dan Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 14:03:15 -0600
To:
Hi,
I noticed there were quite a few submissions this month from people that i
havent seen posting on the PDML, maybe a few member descided to de-lurk :)
Here my 5 favourites for this months:
Night Perspective by Artur Ledóchowski,
http://pug.komkon.org/02jan/mostek.html
I really like the
- Original Message -
From: aimcompute
Subject: Re: Newly skinned LXs.
Do they have these for those junky plasticky PZ-1p's? :-)
I saw some spray vinyl at an automotive shop that might do for
the PZ-1p quite nicely.
William Robb
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
I'm just a stupid novice, so my opinion is admittedly not worth much,
but I've been using Frontpage since 1998 and have never had a problem.
I used Frontpage 98 up until about 6 months ago and then switched to
Frontpage 2002. I skipped over Frontpage 2000, but there's not much
difference between
The negative stage does not move on the 23CII when adjusting for
different formats, the light source and condenser lenses above it do the
moving.
Thanks,
Ed
http://lightandsilver.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tom Rittenhouse
Thanks Ed. You know how to make a guy feel good. :-) I also had '98, and
while I admit I didn't use it a lot, I didn't have the kinds of problems I
do with '00.
One other thing it does... when I make a change to a page and click on the
preview button to see it in the browser, it's supposed to
Why? MS hasn't fixed windows inhow many years has it been?
On Tuesday 01 January 2002 18:08, aimcompute wrote:
I have a nice design coming along, but FrontPage2000 keeps losing
pieces of it. In addition it works very erratically and
inconsistently. You would think MS would have this
Rob,
I've seen this shot of yours before, and indeed it is ugly. But
these OOF areas have an edge to them that is more defined and dense than
the inner surrounding area, more like a donut produced by a mirror lens.
No Nikkor or Pentax lens that I have has ever exhibited that. And if I
Nope ... the negative stage remains stationary.
Tom Rittenhouse wrote:
'Cept that don't work with a Beseler condenser head. The Beseler moves the
negative stage up and down the cone of light until it just covers the
negative area. The enlarger works pretty well if you have the neg higher up
I don't know about those ersatz cowboys, but the rooster in the
background is very well-known as a character actor. He played the
barnyard cock in Shane (much younger then) and was in The Shootist with
John Wayne, amongst other westerns. Did a lot of musicals, too.
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
I
My favorites after a first glance:
Aces by Darryn Richter: the subject is a cute
kid and yet it's more than just a cute kid
picture.
Wedded Bliss by Vickie Haun: ok, weddings are
very much on my mind these days. You captured a
great moment there. Would you like to shoot my
wedding? :)
I've only shot with my new TLR once, but I really
enjoyed composing within a square. Here are the
fruits of my first effort:
http://www.dirtybackroad.com/photos/tlr/index.html
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the
Tom,
I use Dreamweaver, you can download a trial from the Macromedia website.
Interface is different from most other HTML editing software, shouldnt take
long to get used to it and once you do its an extremely powerful edit
program.
Thanks,
Paul
- Original Message -
From: aimcompute
It's the SMC Pentax, rather than the Takumar. I don't know what the serial
number is.
Paul
Jody L. Reese wrote:
Hey Paul - sounds like you had some fun. I hope you enjoy the new lens at
such a great price. I started with a 90mm (leaf shutter) lens with my
system because I like a slightly
Hi,
Stop in at a good camera store and get yourself a copy of the Kodak Darkroom
Dataguide. It will list recommended developers and other chemicals needed to
process that Tri-X . It also provides good instructions. You'll see the book
includes developmeent times for the various films. If I were
Tom Rittenhouse wrote:
We'll have to talk about speed graphics sometime, Paul. We seem to be the
only ones who still use them. Do you use yours as a press camera, or as a
view camera?
Hi Tom,
I now use my Speed Graphic primarily as a view camera, although I have used it
as a press camera in
Hi Tom,
Your assertion is correct. Bigger files make better prints. But just for the
sake of clarification, I don't downsample my high res images. I scan 35mm
transparencies at 4000 ppi, then print them on my Epson 1200 o about a 10 x7
format. Resizing without resampling gives me a file of about
Good you have the SMC - the optics are alot better with that version than
the older Takumar versions. Less aberrations and better resolution. Enjoy.
Jody
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 7:21 PM
Subject:
Hi Paul ...
Allow me to present another side of your suggestions, although they are
good ones.
First, I'd recommend against HC-110 and stick with D-76 or ID-11 as the
first developers, since they are, essentially, the benchmark by which
other developers are measured. From there I'd experiment
NYIP has a series on BW processing on their web site. There are ten
installments and, for someone getting started, or just wanting to
refresh his or her information, it's a good place to check out.
http://www.nyip.com/tips/topic_black_white.html
Tom - I used Claris Home Page v 2.0 for my web sites. As of about a year ago
it is no longer supported and will not be upgraded. So I am slowly switching
to Adobe GoLive 5.0. From what I have read, this is a good compromise
between the bare-bones hand coding of the free and cheap programs, on the
Thanks Paul,
I'll give it a gander.
Tom
- Original Message -
From: Paul Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 7:08 PM
Subject: Re: Web Page Development
Tom,
I use Dreamweaver, you can download a trial from the Macromedia website.
Interface
Thanks Stan,
I'm interested in GoLive since I have Photoshop. I'm going to get a copy
and give it a go.
I have coded some HTMLand find it abysmally mundane. Scripting languages
are like the most boring part of any programming language, with all the fun
removed. Formatting of output is
Why are people so enamored with Tri-X?
I use Tmax 100 developed with Tmax developer
and the results are outstanding. Tri-X is
so grainy I dont understand why anyone would
want to use it anymore.
Just a quick comment on Tmax 400, it's way too
fussy and I have never been able to get good
results
Not sure if this helps your decision making, but I made a 1200 dpi scan
of the center 1/3 of an almost 8x10 print from my Olympus P-400 dye
sub printer (scanner was an Epson Perfection 2450 Photo, original image
was on Velvia, LX, SMC 135/2.5, scanned using RFS3600 at 3600 dpi, then
printed at
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I don't know about those ersatz cowboys, but the rooster in the
background is very well-known as a character actor. He played the
barnyard cock in Shane (much younger then) and was in The Shootist with
John Wayne, amongst other westerns. Did a lot of musicals, too.
I'm new. I write from Italy and I recently bought a SFXn: there's someone
who have too?
--
Marcello Anselmi Tamburini
Sent through GMX FreeMail - http://www.gmx.net
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't
93 matches
Mail list logo
