- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton
Subject: Re[2]: Big announcement coming up
William,
You are not going to convince me to move up format again!
Brother Bruce
Hah!! This weekend, I made the lensboard for the 65mm Super
Angulon that I bought from SK Grimes a few weeks ago.
Images from my 4X5 Speed graphic,
even with the cheap optar lens blow
away 6X7. Sorry but its true.
JCO
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bruce Dayton
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:15 AM
To: William Robb
Subject: Re[2]: Big
On 2 Jun 2002 at 23:27, William Robb wrote:
Chris, I am not going to rehash everything that Mafud has said
about small format digital capture.
I am only going to say that now that I have actually had the
opportunity to work with the results, I have to agree with him.
And yes, it pains me
On 3 Jun 2002 at 2:35, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
Images from my 4X5 Speed graphic,
even with the cheap optar lens blow
away 6X7. Sorry but its true.
I've had 110 images blow away 67 images, it really depends upon the image
content, true?
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
At 00:35 3.6.2002 -0600, Brother William wrote:
Hah!! This weekend, I made the lensboard for the 65mm Super
Angulon that I bought from SK Grimes a few weeks ago. This is
equivalent to a 21mm lens on the 35mm format, or (closer to
home) somewhat wider than the 45mm lens on the 6x7.
The coverage is
Hi,
I have a few fav's from the PUG, here they are no particular order.
At the movies by Maciej Marchlewski
http://pug.komkon.org/02jun/w_kinie.html
I really like portraits that set the subject in a location/situation that has
meaning to them. Nice shot.
Brothers and Sisters by Matjaz
- Original Message -
From: Antti-Pekka Virjonen
Subject: Re: Re[2]: Big announcement coming up
Ahh.. so it must be the older silver colored one (no
multicoating) ?
I have the new Super Angulon 58 XL f5.6 (black) for my 4x5.
Equivalent
to something between the SMC 18/3.5 and the
I heard a rumor while at the Grandfather Mountain Photo Weekend that an ISO
100 Velvia with grain similar to Provia will be available this fall.
Bill KG4LOV
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the
Scott Nelson asked for opinions and stories on making lightboxes...
Just got to tell you about my own (stupid) adventure here...
When I wanted I lightbox, I figured it would need to be BIG so that I could
view many slides at once. For composing series, for example.
It also occurred to me that
Dnia 3-06-2002 o godz. 9:00 Paul Jones napisa(a):
Hi,
I have a few fav's from the PUG, here they are no particular
order.
At the movies by Maciej Marchlewski
http://pug.komkon.org/02jun/w_kinie.html
I really like portraits that set the subject in a
location/situation that has
meaning
Italiano que ama la Argentina.
I do agree: better if the shadow was complete, but the shot was taken from
inside our car while overtaking the bus. Thank you for comment and devoting
your time to this task.
Ciao / Chau
Fabio
- Original Message -
From: Juan J. Buhler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Thanks Butch - I appreciate your comments. Sorry about the off-colour,
I've looked at it on two screens here and it's Ok.
John Coyle
Nicholas John Consultants
Brisbane, Australia
On Saturday, June 01, 2002 7:49 AM, Butch Black
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
File: ATT3.txt; charset =
Bob Rapp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hire SOME marketing and promotion people!
There must be some of them among the Pentax staff, at least one... Hmmm, perhaps they
are C or N agents, huh?
Anyway, my wish list goes like this:
- ANY IS and/or USM lenses (preferably an IS version of the
Bill wrote:
I heard a rumor while at the Grandfather Mountain Photo Weekend that an ISO
100 Velvia with grain similar to Provia will be available this fall.
If this is to be taken literally, it's bad news indeed. This means a film
that's significantly less sharp than Velvia (judging from
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hah!! This weekend, I made the lensboard for the 65mm Super
Angulon that I bought from SK Grimes a few weeks ago. This is
equivalent to a 21mm lens on the 35mm format, or (closer to
home) somewhat wider than the 45mm lens on
Cameron wrote:
It's been what, a year and a half since the 31mm limited was introduced, as
well as the MZ-S, and it has been mighty quiet in Pentaxland in the 35mm
departmewnt. I think something BIG is afoot.
Well, 1. June is gone but Pentax Japan page hasn't been updated yet. One
can hope -
This subject started me wondering again about the possibility of using
Mamiya 645 (tele)lenses on my Pentax 35mm gear.
I remember vaguely that there are adapters for this purpose in existence.
Does anyone on this list know something more specific?
Even better, are there Dutch readers who know if
Hi All,
After 10 or more years without a 67, I have one.
Congratulations Bob!
Just for your reference (and Paul J by the sound of it), I contacted CR
Kennedy last Friday to find out whether they would still work on the
original 6x7. The answer was yes for servicing and they would do
Paul F. Stregevsky wrote:
when doesn't this happen ? Only if the sun is at your back.
about my statement:
But there is a disadvantage: It has big troubles with flare.
If there is a light source not even in the picture area
but nearby you get tremendous flare.
Hi Paul,
I meant: if the
Hi Bruce,
I haven't had any problems with my 2450, but I have read of someone
who found that the lens on their 2450 was not focussed to the correct
distance. I think they had to pack pieces of thin card (or thick paper)
under the holders and slides to get the distance right. If that was
I'm informed (in detail) about a coming Limited lens but unfortunately
sworn to secrecy. I don't know if it is the next one or when it will be
released. However, it's two years since the last one in September so it
should be released this year.
Ah, I know. It's a tele longer than the 77. :)
Alexander wrote:
Is Pentax ever going to release the black Limited lenses in the US?
I've been told that they are working on it. Whether they succeed or not is
another issue...
I suspect that Pentax plan to market them i Europe at some stage since they
are distributing the parts for black
As promised to the Owens', here is my post to the list to say that I
have arrived at home safe and sound.
I will be subscribing shortly on the 'good' account shortly.
César
Panama City, Florida
P.S. I almost waited until I got out of N. Carolina
Juan J. Buhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PS: Hi PDML, I'm back after a few months of lurking...
Hi Juan,
It's so nice to have you back were you belong!
(you are right, it's a quote from 'Hello, Dolly!' :-) )
I'm not very present in these weeks too... I barely have the
time to read the messages
Hi Steve and Paul,
but what about the lenses which are not build by Pentax itself but by third
party suppliers and then only labelled with Pentax ?
Can we rate them really as 'genuine' and have peace of conscience during
submission ?
;-)))
best regards
Bernd
-Original Message-
I've been completely satisfied with purchases made from Adorame.
Steve Pearson wrote:
Has anyone purchased from this internet site? I'm
considering ordering some Fuji Reala film and just
wanted to make sure they are reliable and trustworthy?
BH is currently out of stock.
--
Shel
When Rob said digital is not good to learn with and I
agreed it was
based on the fact most users will just hit delete when
they take a bad
pic, regardless what many may say it happens and even
experienced
photographers will do it with digital. Taking a bad
photo lets you
learn from your mistakes,
In my experience they are just as reliable and
trustworthy as BH, if not more so. I often find that
their prices are better too, althought their shipping
is usually slightly more.
HTH
/\/\ick...
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and
On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Steve Pearson wrote:
Has anyone purchased from this internet site? I'm
considering ordering some Fuji Reala film and just
wanted to make sure they are reliable and trustworthy?
BH is currently out of stock.
Several times, actually.
Once they had botched my order
Hi,
I have done lot of buying in adorama and goods were good. Never had any issue.
Prices of adorama seems to slightly less than BH, Cameraworld, so I go to adorama.
Thanks
Ramesh
-Original Message-
From: Steve Pearson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:36 AM
In a message dated 6/2/2002 9:58:51 PM Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
(and I snip here for brevity)
My Wish List:
Bring back some high quality manual focus lenses...
Develop and produce a quality rangefinder camera ...
Hire better marketing and promotion people.
Hi,
if people don't want to learn, they won't learn. If people want to
learn, they'll learn. The medium has nothing to do with it. Just
because they can't delete a neg so easily doesn't mean they they're
ever going to look at the print more than once.
---
Bob
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oh crap! Let's not start this again.
christian
On Monday 03 June 2002 10:24, HUDERER Bernd wrote:
Hi Steve and Paul,
but what about the lenses which are not build by Pentax itself but by third
party suppliers and then only labelled with Pentax ?
Can we rate them really as 'genuine'
- Original Message -
From: Paul F. Stregevsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 5:50 AM
Subject: PUG submittal question
I've just read the PUG submittal rules. As I understand it,
either the
camera or the lens must be genuine Pentax; I may not submit
Albert Fekson wrote:
My wish list:
2. ZX-5N II with better AF, mirror lock-up, and P-TTL
Ann Sanfedele adds:
I might even buy one if it had that stuff.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget
Bob-
The weirdest thing is that I had exactly that problem- two rolls had
overlapping
pictures on the negatives, both rolls only exhibited this at the very
end of the
roll, one had torn film sprocket holes (I think I was a little forceful
in winding
when I was trying to get an action sequence and
On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Brendan wrote:
When Rob said digital is not good to learn with and I agreed it was
based on the fact most users will just hit delete when they take a bad
pic, regardless what many may say it happens and even experienced
photographers will do it with digital. Taking a bad
Yeah, exactly- I was very tempted when the FM3A came out
it's the only sub-$800 Nikon that will take older MF lenses
and meter correctly, the N55/65/80 do not.
Taka
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions.
- Original Message -
From: Steve Pearson
Subject: Adorama?
Has anyone purchased from this internet site? I'm
considering ordering some Fuji Reala film and just
wanted to make sure they are reliable and trustworthy?
BH is currently out of stock.
I bought my Tachihara, and my
Rob, I was going to call you a liar, but I realized that it is fall in the
southern hemisphere.
I used to have a Pro70, which I felt that it had reasonable resolution for a
1.7Mpixel digicam.
Today, with the Minolta D7, my shots are clearer on the screen than any 35mm
shot I scan with my S20.
Thanks everyone for your quick responses-I have placed
my order!
--- William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Steve Pearson
Subject: Adorama?
Has anyone purchased from this internet site? I'm
considering ordering some Fuji Reala film and just
wanted
Steve,
They are a good, reliable mail order house. Their prices are on par
and sometimes better than BH and I have ordered from them many times.
Bruce
Monday, June 03, 2002, 7:36:07 AM, you wrote:
SP Has anyone purchased from this internet site? I'm
SP considering ordering some Fuji
I bought a lens from them, via ebay, and was very satisfied.
Paul
Steve Pearson wrote:
Has anyone purchased from this internet site? I'm
considering ordering some Fuji Reala film and just
wanted to make sure they are reliable and trustworthy?
BH is currently out of stock.
Thanks for
I have purchased a camera, 2 lenses, flash, tripod and head, and several
batches of film and have never had a problem. Easy to reach by telephone as
well (I always have to call because I want USPO shipping instead of UPS) and
shipping has been prompt. Their prices are very good.
Maris
-
Here's another from the crapola files.
This one was shot with a Canon Pro 90.
It was shot in RAW, then converted to Jpeg for transmission to
the web.
http://www.komkon.org/~wrobb/0156.jpg (nearly 2 mb filesize)
What I like about this one is what the thing has done to the
power lines and power
A back can be modified to hold the CCD and the necessary LCD panels.
The mechanics of the camera can be removed to make room for necessary
electronics, as well as the two compartments that would normally hold
film.
Leave them. THat way you don't destroy the body and give yourself
Bob S ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Paul,
When the flash symbol doesn't appear, I usually have caused the AF280 or
AF200 to slide off the contact pins on the hot shoe. Probably not your
case..?
A logical hypothesis, Bob, but in my case the camera had stopped flashing
even when I would press the
Adorama has never let me down. Twice after I ordered something by Web, it
arrived the next day!
I just wish they included more photos of the products they list.
Paul Franklin Stregevsky
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow
Hi Team,
I have been away touring the Aussie Alps for six days, drove over 2000km, about
600km of it on corrugated unsealed dirt roads. I shot 35mm, 67 (Mamiya 7) and
my Oly E-10 digital, about 300 images in all. My partner was using a Super A
and the new SMC FA-24-90, as normal procedure for
On 3 Jun 2002 at 5:52, Mishka wrote:
Rob,
Sorry to say, but purely from the technical, image quality, side, an
Olympus Stylus Epic ps gives as good or better pictures, when scanned
at this resolution. Even with 400 film. Better tones. Better latitude.
This just shows how far digital has yet
On 3 Jun 2002 at 10:32, William Robb wrote:
What I like about this one is what the thing has done to the
power lines and power poles, especially near the bottom of the
image. It sucks equally, whether on the screen, or as a print.
The blooming/chromatic aberrations at the high contrast edges
On 2 Jun 2002 at 22:48, William Kane wrote:
Hey gang,
I was thinking recently about making a cheap attempt at building a
DSLR using a pentax body and parts from a working digital camera. I
know that this is an exercise in futility, as it would be more
exspensive/work intensive to do,
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert
Subject: Re: My introduction to digital photography.
On 3 Jun 2002 at 10:32, William Robb wrote:
What I like about this one is what the thing has done to the
power lines and power poles, especially near the bottom of
the
image. It sucks
The answer is in the question: FA 20-35 f4. Very good optical performance, perfect
compatibility, cool lens hood, and constant f4 aperture. Lightweight, too.
Pat White
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions.
SMC is the best? old news Maybe to you and me Brendan, but not everyone knows, and
anyway, it's good to see it in print.
Pat White
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users'
Bill, those are pretty much my feelings as well. Good for snaps,
documentation, the internet, and things of that sort.
That's what my fiance uses his for. It's a lot of fun on trips. It's
actually been very handy for a lot of the wedding planning as well.
There are a lot of situations where
Steve Pearson wrote:
Has anyone purchased from this internet site? I'm
considering ordering some Fuji Reala film and just
wanted to make sure they are reliable and trustworthy?
BH is currently out of stock.
I have always ordered from Adorama. Their prices are reasonable. Only once did
William (I really don't run the thing anymore) Robb wrote:
When I rewrote the guideline, it was because I was getting
submissions identified as Canon and Nikon created. I didn't feel
this was appropriate for a gallery identified with Pentax.
The consensus that I got from the group at the time was
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PUG submittal question
So to clarify..If a photo was taken with either a Pentax
body or a Pentax lens then that would qualify it to be
submitted to the PUG. Is that correct?
Under the present guidelines, yes.
William
Taka,
The winder mechanism is directly geared to turn the small roller that engages the
sprocket holes. The big roller with the 'Magic Fingers' is just there to take up the
slack after the small roller pulls the film across the pressure plate and out of the
cassette!
If the interlock
Bob-
Thanks, I'm just trying to make sure that the drive isn't the cause of
the problem,
as I do not want the warranty period to run out, find out that I have a
bad drive and
now be stuck with a piece of junk.
I never held the rewind knob, that's not the problem. I just hate
worrying about
Pat White wrote:
The answer is in the question: FA 20-35 f4. Very
good optical performance, perfect
compatibility, cool lens hood, and constant f4
aperture. Lightweight, too.
Yup, I appreciate the feedback recommendations on
the FA 20-35 f/4. However, I also appreciate the $475
price BH
Thanks Paul, for kind comment. I'm glad you like it. Actually, the
photograph is cropped just a bit on all sides, because of some
distractive details on top and on the bottom in full frame original. But
basically, it was framed tight on the original slide as well. I just felt it
might create
Hi,
I bought a second-hand Pentax MZ-M with 35-80 zoom as a birthday present for
my son. He has a small manual flash (I forget the make, but that's not
important right now) from a previous camera, which has a contact voltage of
~200v (I mesaured it). I suspect that this would destroy the MZ-M if
I don't know about their mail order service, but they're my favorite
camera store in New York. The sales guys are usually much nicer than
the ones at BH, although BH is better if you want to just go and
look at stuff.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
I too have been pleasantly surprised by the results from
our (first and only) digital camera -- a Canon S110
(purchased just before the Pentax Optio came out). I
bought it as a small, unobtrusive and easy to carry
around camera, thinking it would at least be good for
emailing pictures of
The AF500 will only work in all manual mode ie, full
blast or what
ever you set it to. Look at a vivitar 500fd ( or
something called
that) it does set the aperture in auto flash, it's
weak tho only like
72 gn.
--- Andy Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I bought a second-hand Pentax MZ-M
Hi,
I'm in the same boat as Mick. Took this month's with a 28mm. Mind you,
it's ~technically~ a portrait, being an image of a person or animal.
But, it's not traditional portrait (I don't think).
-frank
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mine was taken with a 28mm wide angle. I dont count it
as
Interesting (or maybe not!), but that's exactly the way N is
marketing their digital ps in an ad that's currently being shown in
this part of Canada. A bunch of silly 20-something ultra-cool
urbanites, taking numerous pictures of each other doing silly things ad
nauseum.
Juvenile fun sums
I have used Edwal film developer with Plus-x. Results were very good as I
remember.
Brendan MacRae
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org
I printed JCO's image on my Epson 1200 at 11x14 and found it to be quite
sharp. Under a glass, the cross hatch bars in the lighthouse window are
crisp as are the air conditioning units below the windows in the tall
building. The ripples in the water are well defined. The color is deep
and rich. I
from memory i got good results with Plus-X in tetinal neofin blue
- Original Message -
From: David Chang-Sang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 10:08 AM
Subject: OT: Plus-X Users ?
Quickie for Plus-X users out there:
I just developed 2 rolls of
I never use T-Max with Plus X. I generally use D-76 1:1 at 68 degrees
for 7 minutes. I'm very happy with the results. My PUG submission for
this month was shot on Plus-X and processed in that manner. I do use
T-Max for TMZ 3200 and sometimes for Ilford 3200 as well. It seems to be
good for high
You might want to watch scanner auctions on eBay. I picked up a used
Nikon LS-2000 last fall for $575. They might be less now.
Joe
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users'
some really big, heavy and expensive body packed with all the features
possible to match the EOS-1v and F5 - so that I could say that there's a
fully professional big Pentax body:))
Um645nII?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bill,
Hey gang,
I think that covers most of the issues. Anyone see anythign else
that might need to be addressed?
Il Bill
I don't notice any mention of software here? As a software engineer, I can
assure you that all the fancy hardware in the world won't do much for you if
you don't
Pat wrote: So, until I will the lottery, I may not see the FA 20-35 f/4
(unless someone has one to sell?) ;-) So, in the mean time, still looking
at third party
options.
Consider these options:
1. Tokina AF235 II HLD, 20-35mm, f/3.5 to 4.5, autofocus, 77mm filter, 82mm
wide, 75mm long, 500 g,
I am expecting my first order from them tomorrow according to the
tracking info. Adorama was the only place I could find a NEW PZ-1p. I
don't know if they have any more but mine was only $500 with the Pentax
4-year extended warranty.
On Monday 03 June 2002 09:36 am, Steve Pearson wrote:
Paul,
I printed the scan as JCO did it. Only slight crop to fit 8X10
dimensions. Like I said, it seems better than the scans from my unit,
but not quite as crisp as from my lab. Had I gotten results like
JCO's, I might have kept the unit.
Bruce
Monday, June 03, 2002, 5:13:27 PM, you
The PUG seems to be down. I had hoped to spend some time in there
tonight. My initial perusals of the gallery left me very impressed.
There are some great images posted. Bill Robb's shot of the young woman
was among the first that caught my attention. Magnificent lighting,
which one might expect
I just got in, no probem...
-frank
Paul Stenquist wrote:
The PUG seems to be down. I had hoped to spend some time in there
tonight. My initial perusals of the gallery left me very impressed.
There are some great images posted. Bill Robb's shot of the young woman
was among the first that
I may share one part of that tale. :)
About 2 1/2 years ago, when I weighed 360+ pounds, I had an
epiphany of sorts and in a flash of insight came to the
realization that I was an anorexic, but had been
over-compensating. Now, I have decreased my over-compensation
and have gotten my weight down
Become a bike courier.
Injest 4000 calories a day (I'm not kidding) and stay skinny.
regards,
frank
Len Paris wrote:
I may share one part of that tale. :)
About 2 1/2 years ago, when I weighed 360+ pounds, I had an
epiphany of sorts and in a flash of insight came to the
realization that
OTOH, you could try to ingest those calories.
Sheesh...
frank theriault wrote:
Become a bike courier.
Injest 4000 calories a day (I'm not kidding) and stay skinny.
--
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The
pessimist fears it is true. -J. Robert
Oppenheimer
-
This
On Mon, 03 Jun 2002 21:45:30 +, Paul Stenquist wrote:
The PUG seems to be down. I had hoped to spend some time in there
tonight. My initial perusals of the gallery left me very impressed.
There are some great images posted. Bill Robb's shot of the young woman
was among the first that caught
I just posted a photo taken inside the camper at Grandfather Mountain last
week. It was taken with the Pentax 645 and Arsat 35mm/3.5 fisheye lens. I'm
pleasantly surprised at the results.
http://communities.msn.com/BillOwensPhotos/shoebox.msnw?action=ShowPhotoPho
toID=11
Bill KG4LOV
[EMAIL
As often quoted, there is nothing signifricantly better or easier to use
than D76 1:1
Bob Rapp
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: David Chang-Sang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 10:08 AM
Subject: OT: Plus-X Users ?
Quickie for Plus-X
PENTAX EXPANDS 35MM LENS SYSTEM WITH TWO SUPER-COMPACT LENSES: SMC-FA
28MM-105MM F/3.2-4.5 AL [IF] AND SMC-FA 28MM-90MM F/3.5-5.6
DENVER, Colorado (May 21, 2002) . . . PENTAX Corporation expands its line of
35mm lenses with the introduction of the SMC-FA Zoom 28mm~105mm f/3.2~f/4.5
AL [IF] and
...and wouldn't you know I just ordered a SMC FA 28-105/4-5.6 from KEH
this morning.
On Monday 03 June 2002 09:53 pm, you wrote:
PENTAX EXPANDS 35MM LENS SYSTEM WITH TWO SUPER-COMPACT LENSES: SMC-FA
28MM-105MM F/3.2-4.5 AL [IF] AND SMC-FA 28MM-90MM F/3.5-5.6
--
Kenneth Archer, San Antonio,
Bill, just wondering, are you referering to the Arsat 30mm fisheye or do you
have a different lens?
Luis
- Original Message -
From: Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:21 PM
Subject: 645 and Arsat 35/3.5
I just posted a photo taken
On Mon, 3 Jun 2002 22:16:53 -0500, Ken Archer wrote:
...and wouldn't you know I just ordered a SMC FA 28-105/4-5.6 from KEH
this morning.
I will be interested if the newer one is better than the older FA 28-105 power zoom.
My guess would be no.
I use the 28-105mm PZ for my walk-around lens.
Get yourself another Stofen omni bounce. It's only $20.
Jeff
- Original Message -
From: Brendan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 11:19 PM
Subject: mono light choice delima
Ok I'm pulling my hair out over the choices, it's down
to Alien Bees
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist
Subject: PUG down?
The PUG seems to be down. I had hoped to spend some time in
there
tonight. My initial perusals of the gallery left me very
impressed.
There are some great images posted. Bill Robb's shot of the
young woman
was among the
I relied on the comments on Stan's page regarding the 28-105 models and
chose the older power zoom model rather than the newer models. Not
that I want a power zoom, but the consensus seemed to favor the power
zoom model's optics and build qualities.
On Monday 03 June 2002 10:34 pm, Gary L.
I don't think they are very new. They can be seen here:
http://www.pentax.co.jp/japan/product/lense/35_spec/35_siyou_sz.html#sz-faz28f32-105f45
regards,
Alan Chan
_
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill Owens
I just posted a photo taken inside the camper at
Grandfather Mountain last
week. It was taken with the Pentax 645 and Arsat 35mm/3.5
fisheye lens. I'm
pleasantly surprised at the
- Original Message -
From: Alan Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't think they are very new. They can be seen here:
http://www.pentax.co.jp/japan/product/lense/35_spec/35_siyou_sz.html#sz-faz2
8f32-105f45
Boz's site said that they were introduced in 2001.
Bob Rapp
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Cliff Nietvelt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Um645nII?
No kidding? They sell the 645 N II in the 35mm format? Or maybe they introduced a 35mm
interchangeable film back for it?:))
Speaking seriously, the 645 N II is a great camera but it's a medium format after all,
so it's not the
I just finished a photo trip report for our travel club about the Palouse,
Washington.
The Palouse is very popular with photographers. Even John Shaw took many
photos there. I'll have to go back in the late summer when the hills turn
golden
during harvest time, which usually is the best time for
99 matches
Mail list logo
