And that caterer is one of your best sources of new clients, make damn
sure she likes you.
William Robb wrote:
If you are planning on taking up weddings as a money earner, remember that
you are working for the bride and groom, but you are working with the
caterer and the minister.
If you
On 1/25/07, John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 12:28:51PM +0900, David Savage wrote:
At 05:05 AM 25/01/2007, Jens Bladt wrote:
Phase One just told me that the support for the K10D RAW files won't come
until April 2007 - LE version 3.7.7
What do you guys do?
It sounds like a solicitation for work for hire. Does the client
retain rights to ALL of the images from the shoot or just the 50 or so
images submitted?
Effectively that's what it is but the rights are to the 50 submitted
images only although i'm not sure where I stand if I shoot very
similar
Fra: Boros Attila [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Dag,
Tuesday, January 23, 2007, 12:37:50 AM, you wrote:
Tired of fencing, close the door please .-)
http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=283279
DagT
http://www.thrane.cc
I like it, but it's kinda strange. I would not
Hi All
some advice would be appreciated - my wife and I run a website on soil
invertebrates http://soilbugs.massey.ac.nz that we developed from a
grant from a government agency my wife got. It is a freely available
website which contains a lot of images of animals. We retain the
copyright to
Fra: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=283279
I like it, but it's kinda strange. I would not expect to see a door
lying on the ground, nor a bunch of dried leaves mixed with grass
behind a closed door. If I think about it, it
I completely agree with Godfrey's recommendation of Real World Camera Raw By
Bruce Fraser (even though I don't have CS2). It's a bargain at its full price
but I recently picked up a second hand copy through Amazon and got it airmailed
to Australia for under $20 total.
Grab a copy - you wont
There's no right or wrong answer to this.
I run a website on Australian flora for an Association that I belong to. The
site has a gallery of several hundred images (some good, some pretty
ordinary). Most of the images are mine but there are photos by others also.
Like your site, all
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 01:30:46 +0100, Patrice LACOUTURE (GMail) wrote:
Hello,
Some of you may have noticed my latest GESO, about a nice conjunction
between the thin moon crescent and the planet Venus last Saturday (GESO
visible here):
I beleave sometime in march, there will be a lunar ecplise.
There's also a version of Real World Camera Raw for CS1.
Paul
On Jan 25, 2007, at 5:02 AM, Brian Walters wrote:
I completely agree with Godfrey's recommendation of Real World Camera
Raw By Bruce Fraser (even though I don't have CS2). It's a bargain
at its full price but I recently picked up
Congratulations on your purchase. Odd though to read that when I've just
sold mine and now don't have a digital camera at all ;)
Cory
- Original Message -
From: Evan Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 5:58 PM
Subject:
I reported last night that while I still couldn't make a decent print
on my R2400 with photoshop controlling the print color space, I was
able to print with ColorSynch. This is from a Mac G4. Today, I studied
the results. These prints are off as well, but in a different
direction. Where the
By the way, I already tried reinstalling the Epson R2400 printer
driver. However, I didn't remove the old one first, and my print
settings were still as I had left them after installing the new driver.
This caused me to wonder if I had actually succeeded in replacing the
driver. Should I have
I am sure it has been debated at length in the past, but I am
considering buying a lens from Germany to be shipped to the UK. Will
this come with an international Pentax warranty that Pentax UK will
honour? I think I am right in saying that it does, but would like
reassurance - it is quite a
As I understand it as long as the place you buy it from fill out a
Pentax International Warranty Certificate it should be covered.
Cheers,
Dave
On 1/25/07, Rob Brigham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am sure it has been debated at length in the past, but I am
considering buying a lens from Germany
Bruce,
A bit different view and a nice one. I like the graceful curve below
the seeds about to be scattered. I don't know how I feel about the
Black White. Does it work in color?
Regards, Bob S.
On 1/24/07, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Taken on walk.
Pentax K10D, Tokina AT-X
Thanks - will check this with the suppliers.
Rob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
David Savage
Sent: 25 January 2007 12:32
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Warranties Pentax stuff within the EU
As I understand it as long as the
Here's a happy way to close a thread. Bo-Ming has surfaced and posts
this on a different list. It's all been sorted.
I am Bo-Ming.
I just spoke with mehrdad over the phone. It was a
very
nice chat, we talked about computer stuff and our life
stories and stuff like that. It was all a huge
Howdy gang!
Has anyone had an opportunity to compare manual focusing on an *istD
or K10D vs. a DL or K100D? I've been playing around with M42 and M
lenses on the K100D and find that it's viewfinder is atrocious. I'm
kinda curious as to how the others compare.
--
Scott Loveless
On 25/1/07, graywolf, discombobulated, unleashed:
That puts it in a nutshell!
Thanks Tom. Coming from you that's a welcome compliment.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML
Paul Stenquist wrote:
By the way, I already tried reinstalling the Epson R2400 printer
driver. However, I didn't remove the old one first, and my print
settings were still as I had left them after installing the new driver.
This caused me to wonder if I had actually succeeded in replacing
Godfrey, interesting study. Wished there was a DA 28/2.8 AL.
Henk
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Godfrey DiGiorgi
Sent: 24 January, 2007 10:35 PM
To: PDML List; SeePhoto Talk
Subject: Pentax FA28/2.8 AL vs FA35/2 AL lenses: how do they
Light and unsaturated was my impression of prints done on the R1800
in High Speed mode. I realize that you're experiencing a change while
using your past settings, but this is short and won't take much of your
time to read. :)
I'm feeling your pain.
Jack
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Rob,
When I bought some Pentax items from Germany, I filled the
international warranty card and faxed it to Pentax Europe
(in Germany, I contacted them by e-mail first). They faxed
back the warranty certificate.
Antti-Pekka
Antti-Pekka Virjonen
My inbox today had an eBay invoice for items I did not purchase with a
very convenient pay now link. An obvious scam, but I wanted to let
people know to watch out for bogus invoices.
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/01/25 Thu AM 12:45:06 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Asked to do a wedding.
Public schools?
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Cotty Subject: Re: Asked to do a wedding.
I'd
Scott Loveless wrote:
Has anyone had an opportunity to compare manual focusing on an *istD
or K10D vs. a DL or K100D? I've been playing around with M42 and M
lenses on the K100D and find that it's viewfinder is atrocious. I'm
kinda curious as to how the others compare.
The ist-D and K10D have
Thanks Doug. Good info. I've never tried printing from another machine. My work
laptop is locked, and I can't install drivers on it. But my prints from the
R2400 were perfect for the first month I had it. It started printing badly from
one print to the next last Saturday. Between prints I may
Indeed. And the book is just about the best book ever written on RAW
conversions, even if you don't use Camera RAW I recommend reading it.
-Adam
Paul Stenquist wrote:
There's also a version of Real World Camera Raw for CS1.
Paul
On Jan 25, 2007, at 5:02 AM, Brian Walters wrote:
I
They are more or less the same. Do not go for anything wide, it will
be mighty difficult to tell apart sharp and unsharp. Otherwise, *istD
and K10D have pretty decent viewfinder, after all it is pentaprism and
very bright screen.
On 1/25/07, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Howdy gang!
Scott Loveless wrote:
Howdy gang!
Has anyone had an opportunity to compare manual focusing on an *istD
or K10D vs. a DL or K100D? I've been playing around with M42 and M
lenses on the K100D and find that it's viewfinder is atrocious. I'm
kinda curious as to how the others compare.
I've
On 1/25/07, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They are more or less the same. Do not go for anything wide, it will
be mighty difficult to tell apart sharp and unsharp. Otherwise, *istD
and K10D have pretty decent viewfinder, after all it is pentaprism and
very bright screen.
Thanks,
On 1/25/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott Loveless wrote:
Has anyone had an opportunity to compare manual focusing on an *istD
or K10D vs. a DL or K100D? I've been playing around with M42 and M
lenses on the K100D and find that it's viewfinder is atrocious. I'm
kinda curious
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/01/25 Thu PM 02:59:41 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: manually focusing a DSLR
Scott Loveless wrote:
Has anyone had an opportunity to compare manual focusing on an *istD
or K10D vs. a DL or K100D? I've been
Hi Brian
you forgot the link ;-)
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Brian Walters
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 11:26 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: advice for re-use of images
There's no right or wrong answer
Sure it does batch conversion. I just converted about 200 Tiff files to
Jpeg with other adjustments, (curves and USM), using, Photoshop.
Jens Bladt wrote:
Thanks guys.
Photodhop is not the converter for me. It doesn't do batch convertions, does
it? Inf image is opended and converted at the
On 1/25/07, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott Loveless wrote:
Howdy gang!
Has anyone had an opportunity to compare manual focusing on an *istD
or K10D vs. a DL or K100D? I've been playing around with M42 and M
lenses on the K100D and find that it's viewfinder is atrocious. I'm
On 1/25/07, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/01/25 Thu PM 02:59:41 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: manually focusing a DSLR
Scott Loveless wrote:
Has anyone had an opportunity to compare manual
Thank you. What I really want is a DA 28mm f/2 Limited ... something
about the size of the current FA28/2.8 but optimized for the 16x24
format should be able to make it. :-)
G
On Jan 25, 2007, at 6:09 AM, Henk Terhell wrote:
Godfrey, interesting study. Wished there was a DA 28/2.8 AL.
--
Rattle some bones, burn some incense, prostrate yourself before the
lessor god of the black box. Then purge and reinstall everything.
That's what most IT professionals do. (Actual trouble shooting is just
so much trouble...)
Paul Stenquist wrote:
By the way, I already tried reinstalling
Penta mirror design has one significant flaw - it is not a solid piece
of glass, thus it introduces more assembly tolerances and place for
error.
Viewfinder of *ist is good because it is big. I have MZ-6 which is
reasonable, though seemingly K10D is better if I squint a bit. But
then again I have
The K10D has the same viewfinder as the *ist D/Ds/Ds2, with improved
focusing screens. (I use both a D and a Ds). While very large, (for an
APS-C camera) and bright, after handling them, I didn't think that the
Dl[2] or K100/110 would work nearly as well manually focusing. The D/Ds
screens
I was thinking more of English Public Schools. (Everyone knows if you
go to American Public Schools you're fixated on Breasts).
mike wilson wrote:
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/01/25 Thu AM 12:45:06 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Asked to do a
Silly question: What's tear sheets?
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
graywolf
Sent: 24. januar 2007 18:29
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Opportunity or Rip Off ? Advice Solicited
Mike.
I'm very curious about Lightroom literature. I'd sure appreciate if you
dropped a line or two about the book when you have read it.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Michael Perham
Sent:
Yes, purge and reinstall seems to be the only way to solve this. Thanks.
Paul
PS: Will marijuana leaves serve in place of incense:-)
-- Original message --
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rattle some bones, burn some incense, prostrate yourself before the
On 24/01/07, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've walked past this many times, always wondering how to get a shot I
would be happy with. The morning I took this, the light was just
right and my position was where I wanted it.
Pentax K10D, Tokina AT-X 400/5.6, Handheld
ISO 200, 1/180
Mine show up in a thread, but I have a label and filter defined for pdml mail
Perhaps that makes a difference?
My filter is
Matches: to:(pdml@pdml.net)
Do this: Skip Inbox, Apply label pdml
Wendy
On 1/24/07, Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 25/01/07, David J Brooks [EMAIL
My mind is great too. I was thinking in the same line ;-)
A keeper.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Kenneth Waller
Sent: 24. januar 2007 05:47
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: PESO -
Allow me to clarify. When you send a message to the list which starts
a new thread, you will not see your message in your inbox. Once
someone replies to that message you will see both of them there.
HTH.
On 1/25/07, wendy beard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mine show up in a thread, but I have a
Scott Loveless wrote:
On 1/25/07, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott Loveless wrote:
Howdy gang!
Has anyone had an opportunity to compare manual focusing on an *istD
or K10D vs. a DL or K100D? I've been playing around with M42 and M
lenses on the K100D and find that it's viewfinder
some sources for Lightroom literature and training:
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/software/lightroom1.shtml
http://www.goingdigital.co.uk/pages/adobelightroomcourses.htm
http://pictureflow.fileburst.com/_Tutorials/Lightroom_4/01/index.html
There are several books coming out
The third one has a very good composition. If you make it a tad lighter that
might improve the impact of the sky. Just an idea.
The old one is mighty good.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
On 1/25/07, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note the 10D/20D/30D finder is smaller than the *istD or K10D (it's the
same coverage, but only .9x magnification instead of the .95x of the
Pentax's)
Thanks Adam. That helps a bit. I guess I really need to get a few
bodies together and try them
On Jan 25, 2007, at 5:39 AM, Scott Loveless wrote:
Howdy gang!
Has anyone had an opportunity to compare manual focusing on an *istD
or K10D vs. a DL or K100D? I've been playing around with M42 and M
lenses on the K100D and find that it's viewfinder is atrocious. I'm
kinda curious as to
Thank you. Here are some other resources in return
http://www.photoshopuser.com/lightroom/index.html
http://www.seanmcfoto.com/lightroom/
http://www.photoshopsupport.com/lightroom/tutorials.html
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mike wilson wrote:
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The ist-DL and K100D have pentamirror viewfinders and are not as good.
They are worse than not as good if you are a four-eyed git like me.
I am a four-eyed git but I'm *not* like you!
;-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Tear+Sheets :
tear sheet
n.
A page cut or torn from a periodical and used chiefly to provide
evidence to an advertiser of the publication of an advertisement.
On Jan 25, 2007, at 7:54 AM, Tim Øsleby wrote:
Silly question: What's tear sheets?
--
PDML
Having loaded the K10D firmware, I've been checking wireless flash
using the built in flash and an AF-360FGZ. Can only get it to work in
either A or M mode. No P-TTL?
BTW, I'm not picking up any pre-flash cross talk as I did (sold it)
with the MZ-S.(?)
Wonder if Pentax will be providing an Owner's
Damn, now my hat is too tight.
I think I shall mention why I (and and I imagine some of the others)
do not like doing weddings. I do not deal well with innuendos, slurs,
insults, being yelled at, crying brides, angry mothers, nasty relatives,
and the feeling that a riot is just about to erupt.
Works fine in PTTL mode here how did you set the flash?
2007/1/25, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Having loaded the K10D firmware, I've been checking wireless flash
using the built in flash and an AF-360FGZ. Can only get it to work in
either A or M mode. No P-TTL?
BTW, I'm not picking up any
I will repsond to a couple points..
* It is indeed academic: it is a final evaluation of a bachelor which
means 3 years studies (precision because those things tends to change
quite much from country to country).
* The usual software student do provide (because in line with the
school program so
I like the subject/composition but there are several things detracting from
this one.
Along the bottom there are several distracting bits - LH corner, center
right of main stem RH corner - a horizontal crop eliminating these would
improve the image.
Also along the LH edge are some out of focus
And these cameras really need 1.5x viewfinder magnification to match a
similar 35mm. I suppose the eyepiece is too far from the ground glass to
do that economically.
Adam Maas wrote:
Note the 10D/20D/30D finder is smaller than the *istD or K10D (it's the
same coverage, but only .9x
Should be P-TTL. Make sure the flash is in slave mode.
Make sure both camera and flash are set to the same
channel. Fn menu should be set to wireless and there's
also a custom setting for firing the built in flash as
master or controller.
Mine works fine in P-TTL in Av mode both in master and
Tim Bruce,
should we tell the rest of the list we went to different schools together?
;+)
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: PESO - Flying
My mind is great too. I was thinking in the same line ;-)
A keeper.
Tim
Mostly harmless
One question you should ask are the asking for exclusive rights?
Exclusive rights means that they are the only one that can use the
photos. If they are then you can not sell even out takes. But being a
historical organization they my only want unrestricted rights which
means that they can do
Actually, they don't need a 1.5x magnificationto match the 35mm finders
(except maybe an MX or OM) as they already run much higher
magnifications on most DSLR's than 35mm film(Digital Rebels and
pentamirror Nikons excepted).
To match my F3 (0.75x magnification) a DSLR would need 1.125x
The lighting is what really caught my eye. I walk past this scene
quite often and have always thought there was a picture there with the
strong texture of the bark. This time, the light was right for it.
Thanks for commenting.
--
Bruce
Thursday, January 25, 2007, 8:05:57 AM, you wrote:
EF
Thanks for taking a look, Bob. The color one is fairly monochrome
looking. I felt that the BW was able to better show the cattail
coming apart. If many want to see the color one, I'll post it up.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Thursday, January 25, 2007, 4:52:19 AM, you wrote:
BS Bruce,
BS A bit
Hello Kenneth,
I'll revisit with your suggestions and see what I think. Sounds like
I should post the color one for you to compare. I felt that the
seeding coming apart was better portrayed in BW.
Thanks for looking and suggesting.
--
Bruce
Thursday, January 25, 2007, 9:53:42 AM, you
That is why I like the list - great minds that are helpful. Thanks
for taking a look.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Thursday, January 25, 2007, 8:30:04 AM, you wrote:
TØ My mind is great too. I was thinking in the same line ;-)
TØ A keeper.
TØ Tim
TØ Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
TØ
Well, I finally got my K10D; not from Dell, who still hasn't gotten
it in, but from Best Buy, which had a special on the Kit for $899.
Took two days from order to delivery. The camera feels really solid,
and I'm glad I had the advantage of reading of people's experiences
here so I knew
Well, I do not have a DSLR, so you may be correct, but every one I
looked through had this small image with lots of black space around it,
so I naturally thought that they simply cropped the viewfinder to the
reduced image size. But if as you imply they actually have a full sized
image in the
HUH? I looked thru an istD finder and was shocked
how small (tunnel vision ) the image looked compared to ANY of my
Pentax (full frame) 35mm film bodies. Why are you
comparing them to some of the worst slr finders in this regard
that arent even pentax made models? I agree with graywolf that they
Not a silly question at all. Tear sheets are pages cut out of the
publications where your photos appeared. Usually they simply give you
several copies of the publication and you cut them out yourself. In the
case of expensive books you usually get just the pages before they are
bound into
LOL! And, leave the user to spend hours getting things back to how they
like them. How true. I will admit that sometimes that is the only way to
get things fixed when the OS goes off into some other reality of its own.
P. J. Alling wrote:
Rattle some bones, burn some incense, prostrate
I found this in a condominium that I am helping renovate
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/nytimes/nytimes.html
Anyway, It's up for grabs, providing it is going to a good home.
So, interested parties can email me offlist, telling me why they think they
should get it, in 200 words or less.
As a
Thanks, Brendan.
Decided to check flash in Fn program and toggled over to W setting.
Am now getting the pre-wink P-TTL flash. Still seeing only A or M
as mode settings on the flash.(?)
Jack
--- Brendan MacRae [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should be P-TTL. Make sure the flash is in slave mode.
Make
- Original Message -
From: graywolf Subject: Re: manually focusing a DSLR
And these cameras really need 1.5x viewfinder magnification to match a
similar 35mm. I suppose the eyepiece is too far from the ground glass to
do that economically.
Viewfinder size appears tied to screen
Without getting into all the discussion of specific magnification
values, etc, I find the viewfinder image size and overall brightness
with comparable field of view and maximum aperture lenses in both
*ist DS and K10D to be just about the same to my eye as that which I
had in the Nikon
I hope you enjoy using it as much as I am. It's an excellent camera. :-)
G
On Jan 25, 2007, at 10:56 AM, Micah B. Kleit wrote:
Well, I finally got my K10D; not from Dell, who still hasn't gotten
it in, but from Best Buy, which had a special on the Kit for $899.
Took two days from order to
I find that only lower echelon pros include tear sheets in portfolios. The top
guys let their work speak for them, and it's understood that they're widely
published. As far as PDFs are concerned, PDFs, printed on photo paper, are
nice because you get a much more finished look than with an
yes but for those of us who dont need
to wear glasses the high eyepoint is
of no value while greater VF magnificaiton
certainly would be for manual focussing and
composition. It would be nice if there was
a choice, via different models or interchangable
viewfinders wouldnt it?
jco
-Original
Actually it's not tied real hard but
in practice there are limits of what can be done
with regards to viewfinder magnification of
a given screen size.
The deal is that if you want to magnify
a small screen to appear larger (case in point
with pentax APS format DSLRS) , the
VF eyepoint
Interchangable finders were nice, but nobody has been buying them in
years. Nikon only kept them as long as they did for traditions sake.
-Adam
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
yes but for those of us who dont need
to wear glasses the high eyepoint is
of no value while greater VF magnificaiton
I'm comparing them to two models which are considered to have among the
best finders ever put in a 35mm SLR. The F3HP finder is generally
considered the best 35mm finder ever (Matched only by the Leica R8/9)
and the F100 has one of the best finders of an AF SLR (Outdone only by
the F5 and EOS
Put it up again in 2076, along with a price.
At my age, 1976 seems a recent year.
Jack
--- William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I found this in a condominium that I am helping renovate
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/nytimes/nytimes.html
Anyway, It's up for grabs, providing it is going to
They arent not the best at VF magnification are they
and magnification is a much more important parameter
with a aps format dslr isnt it?? High eyepoint
is not important to some users at all, especially
those who dont need to wear glasses.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
this was probably because the concept was being addressed
thru different models rather than different finders on
one model.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Adam Maas
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 2:54 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/01/25 Thu PM 05:06:34 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: manually focusing a DSLR
mike wilson wrote:
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The ist-DL and K100D have pentamirror viewfinders and are not as
On Jan 25, 2007, at 11:53 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
Interchangable finders were nice, but nobody has been buying them in
years. Nikon only kept them as long as they did for traditions sake.
For those that need/want more viewfinder magnification, Pentax is
offering a useful accessory for the DSLR
On 25/1/07, Scott Loveless, discombobulated, unleashed:
What do you think are the odds that
someone will have a Canon with M42 adapter at GFM? g
Not me!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Jan 25, 2007, at 11:53 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
Interchangable finders were nice, but nobody has been buying them in
years. Nikon only kept them as long as they did for traditions sake.
For those that need/want more viewfinder magnification, Pentax is
offering a
Looks like you're in SL2 mode (at least that's what
it's called on the 540). This puts the flash into A or
M flash mode with wireless. See if you can put the
flash into SL1 mode which provides P-TTL wireless.
Switching between these two modes on the 540 requires
holding the light/format button for
On 25/1/07, Tim Øsleby, discombobulated, unleashed:
Silly question: What's tear sheets?
Handkerchiefs.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
High magnification finders haeve their own issues. I've yet to see a
finder on 35mm over .85x magnification that is easy to see all of the
viewfinder area (The MX was particularly bad for that) even if you don't
wear glasses. While the MX is easy to focus, it's rather hard to frame
images on.
Thanks, Mark. That's precisely why I was asking about a comparison.
Manually focusing a lens on the K100D in any but the best light is a
study in frustration. Otherwise, it's a nice little rig. As I ponder
the possibility of adding a DSLR to my own kit I'm trying to take into
account my
Neat, but I only rarely save stuff like that.
I found something similar in 1989 or 1990 when I went to look at the
apartment I later moved into. The person who lived there before me
had recently passed away and they were still cleaning and prepping
the apartment for a new renter. I
I'll try that. I found it necessary to go to S2 in order for it to work
at all., but haven't tried S1 since the earlier Fn change.
Back in a minute.
Jack
--- Brendan MacRae [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like you're in SL2 mode (at least that's what
it's called on the 540). This puts the flash
1 - 100 of 218 matches
Mail list logo
