On Aug 27, 2007, at 10:44 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
This one doesn't seem to work too well for me. I would really love
your thoughts on this shot and what attracted you to it. I know that
each of us sees things differently, but we can learn from each other
and perhaps broaden our horizons.
Sat Aug 25 17:58:59 EDT 2007
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Aug 25, 2007, at 1:14 PM, frank theriault wrote:
On 8/25/07, David Savage ozsavage at gmail.com wrote:
G'day All,
Just for chuckles:
http://picasaweb.google.com.au/OzSavage/ViewfinderFreeZone
(all shot with the K10D DA
Many thanks for your thoughts. I'll take another look from a
different perspective.
--
Bruce
Monday, August 27, 2007, 11:02:27 PM, you wrote:
GD On Aug 27, 2007, at 10:44 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
This one doesn't seem to work too well for me. I would really love
your thoughts on this shot
On 8/26/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, I get it now.
That accounts for about 60% of my people photography.
How many photos would you like to see? 1500 or 5000?
2361.
DS
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 28.08.2007, at 02:21 , Adam Maas wrote:
I'd say all 3 of the class of '80 Pro SLR's were superb. New F1's
still
sell for prices similar to an LX and F3's are only cheap because
they're
so common, having sold in numbers far exceeding the LX and New F1 (New
F1's are probably the rarest
On 28.08.2007, at 03:18 , Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On the other hand, max X sync speed was 1/80 sec, the TTL flash
sensor was pitiable, and the little LCD readout in the finder was a
far cry from the nice LEDs of the FM or swinging needle of the FE2,
both of which were easier to see and more
Igor Roshchin wrote:
Mon Aug 27 09:58:53 EDT 2007
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks
Subject: Re: Wedding photography
I have proven to my self over an over, if i'm going to do indoor
flash, the SB80DX and D2H are the only way
Thanks to everyone who replied.
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/photoessays/essays/france07.html
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Hi all MF shooters,
last weekend i shoot wedding on couple rolls of 120/220 film.
primary cameras were Nikon and Pentax digital.
Problem: one roll of 220 film was not so tight, when i removed it from
insert. First 220 was ok, and 120 film rolls are always ok.
Perhaps, i was shooting that roll
Tough call. I still enjoy the mechanical feel of the SP500 and the MX,
but the MZ-S with the grip just fit perfectly in my hand. I came across
it the other day, and rather wistfully fired a few blanks. I now I
should sell the damn thing while it's still worth something, but I just
don't want to
Ahh, it looks as NEW...?
Nice toy :)
Gasha
David Savage wrote:
At 09:58 AM 28/08/2007, Scott Loveless wrote:
But I got this one:
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/IMGP5720.jpg
...with MLU, metered prism and the SMC Takumar 105mm f2.4 last year
I wish I had gotten the
HI Scott.
I have the 6x7 with mirror lock up, so i quess thats the more recent
one of that set.
Its heavy, but as proven by WW and Aaron Reynolds, can be handheld at
slow speeds with good results.
I have the 90 f2.8 leaf lens and the Tak 200 F 4( i tyhink it is.)
That 200 is the best lens i
I'm waiting for my 6x7 that i got in eBay :)
non-MLU version is not serviceable, i think so.
But all other versions are.
See this page:
http://www.photoethnography.com/equipment.html
If you would like to do long exposures, better get 6x7 version.
Gasha
Scott Loveless wrote:
Since I'm
Thanks Adam and Bruce.
Dave
On 8/27/07, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Depends on whether you rotate the flash or the camera. I use the Pro
RL which rotates the camera and leaves the flash exactly as
positioned.
If you use a flip type bracket, the head will be over the lens, but
Igor Roshchin wrote:
Mon Aug 27 09:58:53 EDT 2007
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks
Subject: Re: Wedding photography
I have proven to my self over an over, if i'm going to do indoor
flash, the SB80DX and D2H are the only way to go for me. More
On 8/27/07, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps a full on discussion about flash photography would be good on
the list.
Yes thats a good idea. Samples, photos of set ups etc.This comes up a
lot and could be good archive material.
Dave
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Monday, August 27,
Thanks, Ann,
I'll give the sky another look. :)
Jack
--- ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jack Davis wrote:
On our (wife and I) way to the coast to escape the Northern
California
central valley heat, I did a U-turn and a quick hand held grab of
the
attached.
After walking a short
Interesting observations Mark.
I noticed on thing, when i tersted out the K10D back in January.
We had an unusual warm spell then and my grass was still green, so i
did the CWB off the grass, with and without filter in place. The
filter on gave me the brownish tinge as in your R72 sample, while
On 8/28/07, Gasha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ahh, it looks as NEW...?
Pretty much. not a scratch or touch of brassing anywhere on it.
1 previous owner, who was more of a collector than a shooter.
Nice toy :)
I think so :-)
I just need to get it out use it more often.
(no selective quoting
Howdy, gang! In hopes of getting a few more photos submitted, I've left
the form up. I'll take it down tomorrow night and try to get the PUG up
before the weekend. So far we only have 14 entries. Theme is
Strange. So upload your photos of the listguy now!
--
Scott Loveless
[ ... ]
With the exception of the *istD, DS(in TTL mode) and Fuji S2 Pro, all
digital flash systems are entirely pre-flash based and do not use light
reflected off the sensor to determine flash exposure. Traditional
TTL-OTF flash is more accurate than preflash-based flash, but
On 8/28/07, Igor Roshchin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip, I do not frame it correctly, as I do not feel the
direction correctly, and I also tend to tilt it.snip
And the problem with tilt would be?...
;-)
cheers,
frnak
.
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
Cotty wrote:
A few pics from the Poitou-Cherentes last week.
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/photoessays/essays/france07.html
One page of a dozen jpegs about 60 - 120 kb in size.
Canon 1D m II + either Pentax K15mm 3.5 and A*85mm 1.4 lenses.
As my antipodean father-in-law would
On 8/27/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lots going on lately but I'm back to work on this set ...
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/36.htm
As always, comments, critique, and the occasional ripe vegetation
flung with casual exuberance are always appreciated.
http://tinyurl.com/2cpb3p
http://bp3.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/RtQbY12ieaI/Ao0/p93bNgth5mU/s1600-h/aug_27+002.jpg
Comments always welcome.
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Per your welcome comments, I knocked the lighting down slightly. It
does improve the 3-D look and adds some richness. Sky gradation is,
maybe, a little less distracting.
I do like your version.
Jack
http://www.photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=232
--- ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
David J Brooks wrote:
On 8/27/07, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps a full on discussion about flash photography would be good on
the list.
Yes thats a good idea. Samples, photos of set ups etc.This comes up a
lot and could be good archive material.
Dave
Let's do
Now we are adding religion to the mix, this thread is heading for disaster...
PS: Couldn't agree more with your take on God and self-delusion
On 8/27/07, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That is an easy one. You are born, you breed, you die. Just like every other
living thing. That is
Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
On 28.08.2007, at 02:21 , Adam Maas wrote:
I'd say all 3 of the class of '80 Pro SLR's were superb. New F1's
still
sell for prices similar to an LX and F3's are only cheap because
they're
so common, having sold in numbers far exceeding the LX and New F1 (New
Thanks for looking. By the way, this was shot with the Pentax 540 flash firing
into an omnibounce reflector. Exposure very close to ambient light reading. I
believe the shutter speed was 1/30th and the stop was f4.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: John Sessoms
It held my interest. Well composed. I'm looking at it on my work monitor, which
isn't accurate, but I think it could benefit from a bit of midtone brightness
and contrast.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Great shot. I love it.
Cheers,
Dave
On 8/28/07, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/2cpb3p
http://bp3.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/RtQbY12ieaI/Ao0/p93bNgth5mU/s1600-h/aug_27+002.jpg
Comments always welcome.
cheers,
frank
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Nice :)
Composition is not easy in weddings, as there is not enought time always.
Gasha
Paul Stenquist wrote:
I'm still working on processing the pics from that wedding I shot a
few weeks ago. More than 500 keepers, so it's a big job. In terms of
strict composition and the normal
From:
Paul Stenquist
Beer can be helpful in these situations.
... if it's someone else's job to shoot the wedding. Not such a good
idea if it's your job.
At least not until well after.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 8/28/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Per your welcome comments, I knocked the lighting down slightly. It
does improve the 3-D look and adds some richness. Sky gradation is,
maybe, a little less distracting.
I do like your version.
Jack
Scott,
I'd go for a 67. 6x7 with mirror lock-up is a minimum. I like the
165/2.8 lens, but I think the 105/2.4 is the better in your normal
range.
You know there are a full complement of lenses, finders, and gadgets
for these cameras. You are embarking on major league enablement.
Regards, Bob
Margus, Congratulations to you both. Remember to be flexible. Regards, Bob S.
On 8/27/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 8/27/2007 11:33:23 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
July 7, 2007. My K10D had some work to do.
Unfortunately I
On 8/28/07, Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cotty wrote:
A few pics from the Poitou-Cherentes last week.
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/photoessays/essays/france07.html
One page of a dozen jpegs about 60 - 120 kb in size.
Canon 1D m II + either Pentax K15mm 3.5 and A*85mm
From:
Paul Stenquist
I'm still working on processing the pics from that wedding I shot a
few weeks ago. More than 500 keepers, so it's a big job. In terms of
strict composition and the normal tenets of what makes a wedding pic
good, tis is far from the best. But it's my favorite so far.
On 8/28/07, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/2cpb3p
That's an awful lot of chairs...
Nicely captured, and the BW rendering enhances the shape and form.
-Mat
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Toralf Lund wrote:
[ ... ]
With the exception of the *istD, DS(in TTL mode) and Fuji S2 Pro, all
digital flash systems are entirely pre-flash based and do not use light
reflected off the sensor to determine flash exposure. Traditional
TTL-OTF flash is more accurate than
From:
P. J. Alling
There's one born every minute.
cbwaters wrote:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B0002YE65Y/sr=8-1/qid=1188215460/ref=olp_tab_used/002-6279431-0856855?ie=UTF8coliid=qid=1188215460sr=8-1seller=colid=condition=used
A used lens for more than a thousand dollars more
On 28/08/07, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed:
As my antipodean father-in-law would say FAN-BLOODY-TASTIC!
Absolutely beautifully shot.
I think I'm going to cry ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
On 8/27/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A few pics from the Poitou-Cherentes last week.
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/photoessays/essays/france07.html
One page of a dozen jpegs about 60 - 120 kb in size.
Canon 1D m II + either Pentax K15mm 3.5 and A*85mm 1.4 lenses.
Gorgeous shots,
Very nice, Cotty. Makes me want to take another
vacation (having gotten back from two weeks in the
lake district of New Hampshire yesterday...).
Has the Board of Directors of Seeing Eye Productions
considered branching into still photography? Or is it
strictly for fun?
Rick
--- Cotty [EMAIL
Pretty scene, nicely framed but one the whole let down by ugly light.
Cheers,
Dave
On 8/28/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Per your welcome comments, I knocked the lighting down slightly. It
does improve the 3-D look and adds some richness. Sky gradation is,
maybe, a little less
Thanks. You're right. You can't pass up a shot, because it may not last more
than a few seconds. I spotted this, raised the camera and fired away. Fill the
frame and shoot is my methodology for this sort of thing.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Gasha [EMAIL
I was being facetious, John.
However, I usually down one or two in the course of shooting the reception.
Keeps the old tonsil lubricated.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: John Sessoms [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From:
Paul Stenquist
Beer can be helpful in these
From:
P. J. Alling
http://www.mindspring.com/~happydogsoftware/PESO%20--%20bridges.html
Equipment: Pentax *ist-Ds/smc Pentax FA 20-35mm f4.0 AL
As usual comments are welcome but may be totally ignored.
Nice. Where is it?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Hi All,
I picked up a Super Program body, and am looking for a good,
reasonably priced lens for it. I already have a 50mm SMC A f/2, and
so I was thinking I might go for a 1.4 or 1.7. I have my eye on an M-
Series 1.7 that seems to be in good shape. I plan on using my Super
Program
Glen Tortorella wrote:
Hi All,
I picked up a Super Program body, and am looking for a good,
reasonably priced lens for it. I already have a 50mm SMC A f/2, and
so I was thinking I might go for a 1.4 or 1.7. I have my eye on an M-
Series 1.7 that seems to be in good shape. I plan on
I disagree with Ken; I like the arm there, but wish
that the fingers (and rings) were fully in the frame.
Very nice shot Bruce.
Rick
--- Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice lighting composition, but I'm distracted by
the bride's LH arm
inclusion in the frame.
Kenneth Waller
I hate him!
:-)
Lovely shot.
Cheers,
Dave
On 8/28/07, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hopefully a good sample of what the DA* 50-135/2.8 can do.
Last Friday I got a call from someone who had a photographer cancel on
them the day before the event. In this case, it was not a full
Adam,
Great advice...I was thinking of going with a slightly shorter focal
length, as you have suggested. I will do a bit of searching on eBay
for the two lenses you have mentioned. What would be a proper price
for these? As you know, it is sometimes difficult to discern what is
truly
Glen Tortorella wrote:
Hi All,
I picked up a Super Program body, and am looking for a good,
reasonably priced lens for it. I already have a 50mm SMC A f/2, and
so I was thinking I might go for a 1.4 or 1.7. I have my eye on an M-
Series 1.7 that seems to be in good shape. I plan on
Really nice Peter.
Cheers,
Dave
On 8/27/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.mindspring.com/~happydogsoftware/PESO%20--%20bridges.html
Equipment: Pentax *ist-Ds/smc Pentax FA 20-35mm f4.0 AL
As usual comments are welcome but may be totally ignored.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Thanks, Dave. If you have time to work it and put it up. I'd be
interested.
Jack
--- David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pretty scene, nicely framed but one the whole let down by ugly light.
Cheers,
Dave
On 8/28/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Per your welcome comments, I
The A series offer P and Tv modes on bodies which support them, and
function fully on all later cameras except the MZ-60 (which
requires AF lenses). Also many A lenses have updated optical designs.
As to quality, M lenses are usually superior in build, while A
lenses are
Adam,
I don't know the 35/2, but the 40/2.8 pancake (which I have), although
an interesting lens at a slighly unusual focal lenght, is not as sharp
as many other contemporary lenses.
IMHO you can't beat the sharpness and low price of a 50/1.7. Even a
50/1.4 would probably be cheaper than the 40mm
Hi Dave,
Thank you for the tip...
Just so that I know we are on the same page (pun intended), is this
the item you have in mind:
http://cgi.ebay.com/SMC-PENTAX-A-1-2-50mm-Lens-Pentax-K1000-Auto-
SLRs_W0QQitemZ280145469555QQcmdZViewItem?hash=item280145469555
Thanks again,
Glen
On Aug 28,
There's a brand new A50mm f1.2 up for grabs on you-know-where.
It's not cheap though :-)
Cheers,
Dave
On 8/28/07, Glen Tortorella [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I picked up a Super Program body, and am looking for a good,
reasonably priced lens for it. I already have a 50mm SMC A f/2,
You'd lose Program and shutter preferred modes, not that I consider
either much of a loss...
Glen Tortorella wrote:
Hi All,
I picked up a Super Program body, and am looking for a good,
reasonably priced lens for it. I already have a 50mm SMC A f/2, and
so I was thinking I might go for
Glen,
I like all the M lenses even though you lose the Full Tyro modes of P
Tv. This is not much of a concern if you are shooting manual or
Aperture priority.
It depends on what you want to shoot, but if I were starting from
scratch I would get an A50/1.4 or M50/1.4 (you'll like the brightness
I'm not quite good enough with Photoshop to do that. I was talking
about the harshness of the light :-)
If possible I'd recommend re-shooting when the light was more
flattering to the scene.
Cheers,
Dave
On 8/28/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, Dave. If you have time to work it
I have 'abused' an F3 to the point that it and the winder had to be sent for
repair. The winder could not be repaired!
Now as to the LX, a few here can attest to the appearance of my 'original' LX.
I have had mine in rainstorms, snowstorms, and sandstorms. They have been with
me at
Ultimate Sharpness isn't as important as having a camera with you at the
right time, I found the M 40mm good for that.
http://pug.komkon.org/02jul/cvdbrdg.html
Minelli Flavio wrote:
Adam,
I don't know the 35/2, but the 40/2.8 pancake (which I have), although
an interesting lens at a slighly
- Original Message -
From: Adam Maas
Subject: Re: Film slrs
They're extremely uncommon around here. I never see them (Any F1 is a rare
thing, even the common FD bodies are thin on the ground in southern
ontario).
Twenty years of no lens support from the manufacturer will do
On 8/28/07, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm posting this off list because people can get upset with you if you
post links to live auctions that others may be watching :-)
I know, I know
Damn, damn, #$*(@* damn
Cheers,
Effing Idiot.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
- Original Message -
From: David Savage
Subject: Re: Lens for Super Program
Nope that's an A50mm f2.0. And is rather common. The f1.2 version is
quite rare sort after because it's Pentax's fastest 50.
This is the auction I was referring too:
On the Hammonasset River, just South of the Hammonasset Reservoir Dam,
the Upper bridge is Connecticut Rt 80 and the lower foot bridge is part
of the New Haven Regional Water Authority hiking trail system.
John Sessoms wrote:
From:
P. J. Alling
Nope that's an A50mm f2.0. And is rather common. The f1.2 version is
quite rare sort after because it's Pentax's fastest 50.
This is the auction I was referring too:
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/Pentax-A-50mm-f-1-2-Brand-new_W0QQitemZ150142428678QQihZ005QQcategoryZ30070QQtcZphotoQQcmdZViewItem
I'm
- Original Message -
From: Scott Loveless
Subject: Help filling out the Brotherhood application
Since I'm toying with the possibility of selling the K10, I'm also
considering where I'm going to sink the money. One of my options is a
67 with one (count 'em, 1) lens. I got a couple
Thank you, Scott. If you were in my position, would you go for
Dave's recommendation--the 50mm 1.2 on eBay for $59.99, shown here
http://cgi.ebay.com/SMC-PENTAX-A-1-2-50mm-Lens-Pentax-K1000-Auto-
SLRs_W0QQitemZ280145469555QQcmdZViewItem?hash=item280145469555
or would you opt for the M 1.7 I
- Original Message -
From: Toralf Lund
Subject: Re: TTL, P-TTL, other *TTL's and DSLRs (Was: Wedding photography)
Something I've been wondering about lately, is which is better of a
traditional auto-mode and P-TTL. I mean, which is greater of the error
in the pre-flash based
I see. I appreciate the calming effect of subdued light in many many
cases. Might improve this..for many.
Not likely to re-shoot it as it's a couple hundred wrinkly miles away.
As I was shooting it, I was wishing the fronts of the buildings were
not in shadow. I feel, however, that the contrast
On 8/28/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
More beer.
Not enough...
D
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Glen Tortorella wrote:
Thank you, Scott. If you were in my position, would you go for
Dave's recommendation--the 50mm 1.2 on eBay for $59.99, shown here
http://cgi.ebay.com/SMC-PENTAX-A-1-2-50mm-Lens-Pentax-K1000-Auto-
SLRs_W0QQitemZ280145469555QQcmdZViewItem?hash=item280145469555
or
Ha.
Keep reading.
Cheers,
Effing Idiot
On 8/29/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not that I care, but. this is off list how?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
- Original Message -
From: Gasha
Subject: P645 - roll not very tight
Hi all MF shooters,
last weekend i shoot wedding on couple rolls of 120/220 film.
primary cameras were Nikon and Pentax digital.
Problem: one roll of 220 film was not so tight, when i removed it from
insert.
Not that I care, but. this is off list how?
David Savage wrote:
Nope that's an A50mm f2.0. And is rather common. The f1.2 version is
quite rare sort after because it's Pentax's fastest 50.
This is the auction I was referring too:
Hi Dave,
I do not know why, but I saw the 1:2 on the lens, but read it,
1.2--my mistake. Thank you for letting me know about the live
auction issue. I will keep this in mind.
Thanks,
Glen
On Aug 28, 2007, at 11:39 AM, David Savage wrote:
Nope that's an A50mm f2.0. And is rather common.
On 8/29/07, Glen Tortorella [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Dave,
I do not know why, but I saw the 1:2 on the lens, but read it,
1.2--my mistake. Thank you for letting me know about the live
auction issue. I will keep this in mind.
No worries Glen.
Of course, I broke the rule and forgot to
On Aug 27, 2007, at 11:29 PM, David Savage wrote:
That accounts for about 60% of my people photography.
How many photos would you like to see? 1500 or 5000?
2361.
Well, the one I posted last evening, PESO 2007 - 36a, is #1 out of
that for you ... ;-)
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
P. J. Alling wrote:
http://www.mindspring.com/~happydogsoftware/PESO%20--%20rubberboats.html
Equipment: Pentax *Ds/smc Pentax 28-70mm f4.0 AL
As usual comments are welcome but may be totally ignored.
I like the row of boats, but unlike some others, I kinda like the splash
of yellow.
As a theme?? Photos using flash with description.?
Dave
On 8/28/07, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David J Brooks wrote:
On 8/27/07, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps a full on discussion about flash photography would be good on
the list.
Yes thats a good
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Doing a bit of a hunt through some work from earlier in the year, I
found another batch that fit in this theme... :-)
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/36a.htm
Comments and critique always appreciated.
enjoy
Godfrey
www.gdgphoto.com
I like
See what meeting Cotty can do to one's mind.:-)
Dave
On 8/28/07, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/28/07, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm posting this off list because people can get upset with you if you
post links to live auctions that others may be watching :-)
I
Very good.
Dave
On 8/28/07, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/2cpb3p
http://bp3.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/RtQbY12ieaI/Ao0/p93bNgth5mU/s1600-h/aug_27+002.jpg
Comments always welcome.
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri
Put together a small Jalbum page of shots.
Straight from the K10D, no fixin' nor croppin'
http://pages.ca.inter.net/~brooksdj/Baritz/
All with K10D and 360 as fill, outside shots.
Dave
--
Equine Photography
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
Ontario Canada
--
This is most likely not safe for work. Especially if you live in the
Uptight States of America or one of its close neighbors. There is some
implied nudity.
I was doing some googling for video and audio of the 67 and came across
this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l32jLIqo2kg It's a video
frank theriault knarftheriault at gmail.com
Tue Aug 28 09:14:31 EDT 2007
* Previous message: Viewfinder Free Zone
* Next message: P645 - roll not very tight
* Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 8/28/07, Igor Roshchin str at komkon.org wrote:
snip, I do
Scott Loveless wrote:
The A series offer P and Tv modes on bodies which support them, and
function fully on all later cameras except the MZ-60 (which
requires AF lenses). Also many A lenses have updated optical designs.
As to quality, M lenses are usually superior in build, while
You answered your own question.
It's good to know your thoughts on this, Bob
Ergo, I did a good thing.
HAR!
FYI, it wasn't necessary to broadcast them, but keep in mind that very,
very little that is broadcast on this list is necessary. Furthermore, I
did not feel anything about my post. I
In other words, you were shooting from the hip and missed :-)).
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Aug 27, 2007, at 10:44 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
This one doesn't seem to work too well for me. I would really love
your
Tue Aug 28 09:14:31 EDT 2007
frank theriault knarftheriault wrote:
On 8/28/07, Igor Roshchin str at komkon.org wrote:
snip, I do not frame it correctly, as I do not feel the
direction correctly, and I also tend to tilt it.snip
And the problem with tilt would be?...
;-)
...- precisely
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Toralf Lund
Subject: Re: TTL, P-TTL, other *TTL's and DSLRs (Was: Wedding photography)
Something I've been wondering about lately, is which is better of a
traditional auto-mode and P-TTL. I mean, which is greater of the error
in
Don't worry, many sellers make that mistake as well. Leads to some interesting
prices on A50/2's.
-Adam
Glen Tortorella wrote:
Hi Dave,
I do not know why, but I saw the 1:2 on the lens, but read it,
1.2--my mistake. Thank you for letting me know about the live
auction issue. I will
There were natives.??
Dave
On 8/28/07, Rebekah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like the reactions of the natives.
rg2
On 8/28/07, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is most likely not safe for work. Especially if you live in the
Uptight States of America or one of its close
I like the reactions of the natives.
rg2
On 8/28/07, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is most likely not safe for work. Especially if you live in the
Uptight States of America or one of its close neighbors. There is some
implied nudity.
I was doing some googling for video and
On 8/28/07, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William Robb wrote:
I can't speak to the 67 body, I've held one, but not used one. I have used
the 6x7 for about 20 years though, and can speak to it.
You will want an MLU body, non MLU bodies were only available for the first
couple
1 - 100 of 217 matches
Mail list logo
