Cotty,
Well, I have to agree that wides are really cool. They can certainly
emphasize things in a unique way. Your shot was most interesting to
all of us who don't know or care who the subject was. I really
enjoyed it.
Bruce
Friday, December 6, 2002, 12:32:16 AM, you wrote:
Now one could
On Friday, December 6, 2002, at 01:08 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PS: I was trying to figure out how the heck one lifts from the
knees instead of the back when shovelling snow, and I'm wondering
whether snow shovels just aren't long enough for someone of my
height... The only way I could use
I switched to Pentax because the famous Alpa Reflexes don't work in the
cold. And I happened to have an ME Super knocking around.
Don
Dr E D F Williams
http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams
Author's Web Site and Photo Gallery
Updated: March 30, 2002
Hi,
Just a little tidbit. I was experimenting with a MX mirror mechanism and found
that the mirror can easily be returned to normal after flicking the shutter
to achieve pseudo mirror lock.
The aperture stop-down lever is also the mirror flip-up catch therefore if you
gently lower the
Looks good, good luck.
Anton
___
Freeserve AnyTime, only £13.99 per month with one month's FREE trial!
For more information visit http://www.freeserve.com/time/ or call free on 0800 970 8890
Hi,
Friday, December 6, 2002, 4:24:45 AM, you wrote:
P.S. Anyone closely associated with using a Leica rangefinder almost by
definition only uses a few focal lengths--no zooms, nothing over 135mm if
that, no macro (no, the DR doesn't count s).
I've found myself more and more using only a
I can't even imagine (!) facing that lad on a football field!
I'd expire of fright long before he actually slammed into me!
Great shot!
Thanks Keith. He's almost...Vulcan.
Cotty
Free UK Macintosh Classified Ads at
http://www.macads.co.uk/
You are not alone
I am totally blown away by the prints I'm getting off my Epson printers. I
have a Stylus Photo that I've heavily used for around 5 years - mostly 4X6
prints. I just started using the Epson 2000P that I won in an Epson contest
and am really impressed with the quality of the
You'll really like the MX when a winder is attached. Much easier to grip.
While I like light-weight, small bodies, sometimes Pentax bodies seem too
small.
Hi Eleanor,
I agree with Collin. I find the MX very tiny in my hands, and while this
can be an asset, I prefer it with the winder. The motor
Hi Bruce,
I'm in! Address (off list) please :-)
Cotty
For me, the control is important (ala digital darkroom), but I have
been much more blown away by the Agfa D-Lab output from digital files
than the Epson printers. Of course, we are comparing a $200,000.00
printer to a $500.00 printer. I
Well, let's be civil, the both of us then ok? Good, have a
beer on me!
I am having an especially nice Cabernet right now.
I raise my glass to Brad Dobo!!
Cheers
William Robb
Oh my God. Bill's been replaced by a bodysnatcher!
Free UK Macintosh Classified
On 6 Dec 2002 at 9:06, Bob Walkden wrote:
I've found myself more and more using only a 35mm and 85/90mm lens.
One of my favourite photo books of recent years is 'Voyages' by
Raymond Depardon, a Magnum Leica photographer. He says that almost
all the photos were shot with a 50mm lens. The
Brad,
The L converters have less negative impact on your image (especially
vignetting and contrast loss) than the S or 3rd party. Only for
lenses that can use them. I would strongly recommend going with the L
over the S. Remember that not only light loss, but quality loss is
greater with a 2X
Ken Archer wrote:
It must be getting cold up there because it is supposed to get down to 30
degrees F here tonight.
Right now its 27 degrees C at 10pm. Feel free to Fedex me some of that
snow; its going to be hard to sleep tonight!
Our friends in Sydney could use some, too. Big fires
I won't be lifting from the knees, my back or from anywhere else. I had a
hernia repaired on Wednesday and for at least a month someone else will be
doing the shovelling. So I won't be looking at any strange
turquoise-blue-green colours in the snow for a while. But what I am going to
do is some
I was wondering what is your opinion on which is a better scan. I have
scanned the same negative with light medium dust removal respectively.
However, I have found the light one is sharper but has coarser grain,
while the medium one is blurrer but has less visible grain. The problem
is,
Hi Cotty,
on 06 Dec 02 you wrote in pentax.list:
Thanks Keith. He's almost...Vulcan.
Almost... yes I see... his mom might be Vulcan, but his dad... maybe
Ferengi...bg
Great shot!
Regards, Heiko
Hello.
I presume you mean the new IF lens? Yes it comes with a hood - this is the
cute type that has the polariser cut-out in it.
The hood is packaged in the box with the lens.
Kind regards from sunny Brighton
Peter
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I was wondering what is your opinion on which is a better scan. I have
scanned the same negative with light medium dust removal respectively.
However, I have found the light one is sharper but has coarser grain,
while the medium one is blurrer
Na, we're all just looking forward to better times here on the PDML. I
can't stay angry at a fellow Canuck!
Being English ties you in too Cotty!
Best wishes (Holiday Season and all :))
Brad
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
I can see the headache coming. I know from you that the 1.4x L fits my
lens, but not sure on the 2x L, of course, gonna be tough finding a place
that has one to try out. So the quality is worse at 2x then..hmmm.and
800mm was so tempting. ~600mm isn't bad I suppose :) May stick with the
Figure out what the 400mm can do on it's own first Brad...
Cheers
Shaun
Brad Dobo wrote:
I can see the headache coming. I know from you that the 1.4x L fits my
lens, but not sure on the 2x L, of course, gonna be tough finding a place
that has one to try out. So the quality is worse at 2x
Hi Gang,
I know it may sound a bit weird, but why don't we have a Christmas
Party? (or general get together with a few grogs and a chat for those of
the non-christian persuasion).
The logistics could be difficult, but for those of us who are near their
computer on or about the 25th December
You can achieve higher resolution with digital printing than is possible
with optical printing. I too have found that I can produce better prints
on my Epson 1200 than can be achieved by any of the local labs,
including some very good professional ones.
Paul Stenquist
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
I regularly use the A2X-S converter with my SMC Pentax 400/5.6. The L
converters don't fit any of the Pentax 400/5.6 lenses. But the A2X-S and
400/5.6 are a great combination. Very sharp and not too difficult to
focus. The lens has a tripod mount, so balance is okay with the
converter installed.
After surfing the archives, I found the following inquiry to the list from
about 2 years ago (taken verbatim):
I've lately acquired a 300 mm F2.8 A* big glass and naturally am looking
for ways to burn off the extra F stops. If I read the materials correctly
300mm is sort of the breaking
It's time to try my hand at some (insect) macro shots... Hence I'll be
needing:
A) Extension Cord F - 5P
B) Hotshoe Adapter FG
If you have these items to offer, then please contact me off-list. Thanks
in advance. Carry on.
- jerome
___
Jerome D. Coombs-Reyes
PhD
Thanks for all the answers...
I didn't get it, it was German ebay and I couldn't afford to got much higher
than 100 Euro and I also couldn't watch the ending, so I was outbid -_-
Does anybody knows a place where I can get one for about the same price
(maybe somewhere in europe)? I watch ebay
what DPI are you scanning at? which scanner? i think i would stick with
light dust removal and manual touch up the places that need more work. for
this particular image, i think the grain is a useful effect, but also, it's
one where i would not apply any sharpening. there already is motion
Ann, take it to OfficeMax, Kinko's or something similar. They'll do it for a couple
of dollars.
-Original Message-
From: Ann Sanfedele [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: December 05, 2002 2:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: My December photo project for fun and hopefully profit
Oh, well yes, of course. Don't have the cash for a TC for a bit anyhow :)
Brad
- Original Message -
From: Shaun Canning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 5:57 AM
Subject: Re: Already looking at equipment for my 400mm -- TC advice plz!
Figure out
Great idea, better yet is to set up a channel on the IRC for it. Easier to
chat that way!
Brad
- Original Message -
From: Shaun Canning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 6:06 AM
Subject: OT: PDML Xmas Party!!
Hi Gang,
I know it
That's a superb shot! 1600 ISO and looks great! Now, the problem we have
to sort out is, that Bruce D. uses the 1.4 L with his 400/5.6, and you say
it doesn't jive. Are we all talking about the same lens here I wonder?
Perhaps the lens or TC changed? Not likely eh? I'm getting the Pentax
I'm going to try 100%(ly) to get there for Noon.If
i can, do you want me to bring the posters guys.
What a bout parking?Any near by,so i can leave them in the truck
for dispersal later:)
Dave
Pentax User
Stouffville Ontario Canada
http://home.ca.inter.net/brooksdj/
Does anybody knows a place where I can get one for about the same price
(maybe somewhere in europe)? I watch ebay Germany for a while and
there's always a peleng for 250 euro, which I can't afford and nothing
else. thx bye
Hi Katrin
My suggestion: go on USA ebay (www.ebay.com) and do a
William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
why this obsession with feel?
I take pictures because I like using cameras. The feel of the
equipment means as much or more to me as the picture.
A commendable reply William!
I don't care a whit about focus feel myself as long as I like the
resulting image,
definition only uses a few focal lengths--no zooms, nothing over
135mm if that, no macro (no, the DR doesn't count s).
I've found myself more and more using only a 35mm and 85/90mm lens.
Well, this post ~is~ about a zoom, but it responds to your point,
Bob. I've been using the ol' VS1
Hi Jerome,
You wrote:
with an FA 300mm 1:2.8, would one have the option of using
either the 2x-S or the 2x-L? and if so, is the optical
difference neglible?
AFIR, the Pentax lens accessories booklet printed between 198x
and 1990(ish) states something like: Up to 300mm... -S...,
over 300mm
What is the quality (optics) of K35/3.5?Do you recommend it?
It is a real jewel. Optical quality is fantastic. It is small and light
and built very well. This is why I enjoy using it with the LX.
Does anyone know if this lens is the same optical design as the screwmount
version with the
I was looking through the most recent issue of Shutterbug and they have
an article where staffers were making predications about the next ten
years. One of the interesting ( and universal) predictions is that film
will not go away but it's use will drop off quicker than most people
think and that
Katrin,
check out ebay store MoscowGifts4U. I have bought a couple of lenses from the guy, he
ships from Ukraine and he's a nice seler. Got the fisheye rom him for $120 (IIRC) --
fantastic lens. Especially, considering that Photoshop can get rid of fisheye effect,
making this one hell of a
Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 85 f1.8, with matching metal lens hood in KEH BGN
condition. US$130 ONO
Slight cleaning mark on front element, otherwise glass is generally good
with no fungus.
Mechanically good, diaphragm and focus both smooth.
Lens barrel has a few little paint chips and control
Its on 2600, so I have to doubt its sincerity somewhere, but, for what its
worth:
http://www.2600.com/news/display/display.shtml?id=1441
--
http://www.infotainment.org - more fun than a poke in your eye.
http://www.eighteenpercent.com- photography and portfolio.
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Steve Desjardins wrote:
think and that processing services will become more rare or at least
more expensive. Does anyone see this. I realize that many of us don't
want to switch, but I asking for predications not preferences.
That doesn't surprise me, however, I think
As a hero of mine once said, 'I make the pictures for myself - is anyone
else likes them, too bad!'
Cotty,
The late Oliver Gagliani, who I was fortunate to have met, was quoted in
John Sexton's latest newsletter saying:
You will never make a photograph that everyone likes, so
make sure that
I hope Pentax decides to use a 2nd generation Foveon chip. I find the
reviews and discussions about results from the Sigma DSLR very interesting
and I think the next iteration of the Foveon could bring Pentax right up to
speed in the digital world. Pentax builds great bodies and lenses and the
Frank.
I'll apologize for being part of the latest $1 Billion
dollar Government Boondogle.
Sorryg
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu, 05 Dec 2002 20:40:41 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: My first Ebay!!!
Yes, just that I'd never try
O sweet, christmas cames early
in Canada VBG
Feroze
PS. How much have you had to drink?
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 8:34 AM
Subject: Re: I didn't like the topic anymore ;-)
- Original Message
As I wrote in a previous message, I recently picked up the new Pentax
28-105 f3.2-4.5 lens in black for my PZ-1 (though if I had known that
BH would start offering the black version and listing it as an
imported item ...)
I'm now offering for sale the 28-105 powerzoom lens I got a couple of
I sit here in my computer room/darkroom, that is not wired into
the emergency generator, sending you folks email via 21st century
computer using 19th century oil lamp for lighting. Actually, the
computer screen is brighter than the lamp :-)
It seems that all that is needed to complete the
Feroze,
The part is PH-RBC58. Sorry, I don't have the 5-digit
Pentax part number. Any one who has one, is it on the
lens box or elsewhere.
Mark Mangum
-Original Message-
From: Feroze Kistan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 8:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
does anyone have some Pentax publication where it is officially stated
that the FA 20-35/4 AL lens features the new ghostless coating?
Thanks,
Boz
--
_\\|//_ Imagination is more important than knowledge...
0(` O-O ')0 A. Einstein
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I would argue that the experience we have of the equipment affects not
only
the photographs, but _whether_ we photograph or not. Various large-format
photographers have reported a fascination with the groundglass image, and
one (sorry, I can't
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Herb,
The scanner is Minolta Scan Elite FS-2900 at 2820dpi.
regards,
Alan Chan
the dust filtering in my Nikon doesn't affect grain much because it uses
Digital ICE. if i had your scanner, i would stay with the light dust
filtering all the
So Paul, join in on this test to see how the Epson printers compare to
the Agfa D-Lab.
Bruce
Friday, December 6, 2002, 3:19:52 AM, you wrote:
PS You can achieve higher resolution with digital printing than is possible
PS with optical printing. I too have found that I can produce better
Paul,
Sorry, I regularly use my 1.4X-L converter with my A 400/5.6. It fits
just fine. I can't say if the 2X-L fits however.
Bruce
Friday, December 6, 2002, 3:39:31 AM, you wrote:
PS I regularly use the A2X-S converter with my SMC Pentax 400/5.6. The L
PS converters don't fit any of the
What about K35/2.0 and FA35/2.0? Those three lenses are considered to be the
best PEntax 35mm lens. Which one do you recommend?
Alek
Some people believe that A50/1.7 is even sharper than A50/1.4? True or false.
You wrote you prefer 1.4 version
Alek,
I believe the best 35mm may be the
Jerome,
Wish I could help you. I only have the 1.4X-L and a Tamron 7 element
AF 2X converter. The L converters will also fit the FA* 200/2.8
(which I have and use regularly). On the 200/2.8 or 400/5.6, there is
a marked difference in contrast between the two converters. Comparing
On Friday, December 6, 2002, at 08:19 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FA35/2.0 which is probably very good.
Alek
No _probably_ about it Alek. Just, FA35/2.o which is very good. vbg
Dan Scott
Steve,
I wouldn't be shocked to see film usage drop quickly. As to
processing services, tougher call. The newer printing machines are
equally adept at taking film (they actually scan it at high speed) or
digital. The cost/process is the same. The only difference for the
film is that it has to
On my most recent trip, I shot 99+ % with the 20-35 or the 50 1.4. I
used the 50 mainly for speed reasons. I had never been a fan of wide
angles, and I thought I would force myself to think in that mode. It
worked fairly well, although the f4 was slow, and a tripod was
impractical. One
Alek wrote:
And it was M35/2.8 lens for sure? test was done about 15 year ago I think.
Even better than Zeiss? I asked since many people believe K 35mm lenses are alegedly
much better.
I find this a bit weird as I assume (correct me if I'm wrong) the M 35/2.8 is
optically identical to the
Ramesh wrote:
Is Pentax capable( financially / technically ) of building their own CCD?
Are they working on it?
They are certainly filing patents regarding digital sensors. However, making them
themselves make perhaps even less sense than starting making their own film, their own
I know the E-10 is an older camera, but it takes FOREVER to download
images, never mind adjust them. Even though the film drop-off takes
days, it's time I have to wait not waste. . .
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX:
No. Pentax does not have the facilities, expertise, interest or reason to
make their own chips.
BR
From: Nagaraj, Ramesh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is Pentax capable( financially / technically ) of building their own CCD?
Are they working on it?
Bill Sawyer wrote: (re getting comb binding done)
Ann, take it to OfficeMax, Kinko's or something similar. They'll do it for a couple
of dollars.
annsan replies:
Actually, I found that the Staples price I was quoted at first was inflated 'cause the
kid
that gave me the price had included
- Original Message -
From: Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pentax digital SLR
Although Canon makes their own digital sensors they probably will be at a
disadvantage if they stick to their own only while the competiotion can
choose from the offerings of various electronic
Brad Dobo wrote:
Having the ability to shoot at 800mm sounds like it could be
a lot of fun, but I understand not so practical.
nonsense!no different than any other focal length. just
ensure that there isn't camera movement during exposure and
pick a quality film
Thanks, Bruce and Mike.
Mike Wrote:
The F*300ED(IF) is listed under
the -S list of lenses WHICH ARE UNSUITABLE.
Not exactly. For the 1.4x-L half of the table, it's listed as vignetting
at picture corners... but it's not listed in the usuable table at all for
the 2x-S half; hence logic would
Is it just me, or does the bokeh on this Noctilux pic remind you of the
43 Limited?
http://www.alaska.net/~rowlett/images/noctilux/mimi4.htm
R
Dan Scott advised:
You are taking too big a scoop.
Sometimes, but my back complains when I do, and I make the next
scoop smaller...
If your knees can't take the load, what
do you think it's doing to your back?
My knees won't take lifting _me_ up and down that many times!
I'm pretty sure
Anyone ever try the pentax 1.7x converter that changes manual focus to
af
Also any opinions on sigma 1.4x vs pentax
JD
I find this a bit weird as I assume (correct me if I'm wrong) the M
35/2.8 is optically identical to the A 35/2.8, the latter among
Pentax weaker efforts (probably in the league with the A 28/2.8 and
A 135/2.8 lenses). According to tests I've seen the A 35/2 is
apparently even worse.
Pal
And
On Friday 06 December 2002 13:04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm already on a Ramen noodles budget. :-( That's
why most of the film I shoot goes into the freezer instead
of the lab laely.
What is it with IT professionals and the Ramen noodle diet?
Again looking at how the mechanism works I can't see how flicking
the shutter to achieve pseudo mirror lock could cause damage to the
camera.
Rob Studdert
What I have heard from a repairman was that, on slow speeds, once the
mirror is up, there is free moving piece that may cause the speed to
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Christian Skofteland wrote:
What is it with IT professionals and the Ramen noodle diet?
We;re too busy buying toys to feed ourselves.
Christian
eating his ration of noodles for the day
Hah, I got the condensed chicken soup today!
--
http://www.infotainment.org
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Leonard Paris wrote:
I hope Pentax decides to use a 2nd generation Foveon chip. I find the
reviews and discussions about results from the Sigma DSLR very interesting
and I think the next iteration of the Foveon could bring Pentax right up to
speed in the digital world.
On
-- Glenn, wondering whether
I'll get any spectacular
bright sunshine sparkling
on the ice shots today.
We didn't. Temperature rose above freezing and melted all the ice before
the sun came out.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: gfen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Christian Skofteland wrote:
What is it with IT professionals and the Ramen noodle diet?
We;re too busy buying toys to feed ourselves.
Christian
eating his ration of noodles for the day
Hah, I
I know which one for Cartier-Bresson, but what about Winnogrand
and Salgado?
Winogrand used a 28mm almost always, and Salgado, when I heard him
interviewed, said he used a 28, 35, and a 60.
--Mike
Thanks Mike. I did a rapid check on the web yesterday but could not
find the answer for
What is it with IT professionals and the Ramen noodle diet?
Easy to make = less time away from the computer.
That's my excuse anyway...
Lawrence Kwan wrote:
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Leonard Paris wrote:
I hope Pentax decides to use a 2nd generation Foveon chip. I find the
reviews and discussions about results from the Sigma DSLR very interesting
and I think the next iteration of the Foveon could bring Pentax right up to
speed in
On Friday 06 December 2002 13:46, tom wrote:
I quit my IT job to do photography full time.
My young girlfriend made me a grilled roast beef and cheese sandwich
for lunch today. I won't tell you what she was wearing while she made
it.
Oh look, it's almost 2, time for a nap!
tv
I hate you
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reading the life experiences of photographers I admire, it is clear that
they simply do their own thing and be done with it. That notion finally
hit home with me, but bloody hell, it took 40 years!
:-)
Cotty
that's true, but if you want to
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Reading the life experiences of photographers I admire, it is clear that
they simply do their own thing and be done with it.
Recommended book: Seeing the Light by Tom Shroder and John Barry (ISBN
0-769-43282-5)
It's the story of Clyde Butcher and a remarkable
Somehow I'm thinking that you have just a little more leeway shooting
a kid with an ultra wide than his mother. :)
Bruce
Friday, December 6, 2002, 1:17:11 PM, you wrote:
DS On Friday, December 6, 2002, at 02:13 PM, Cotty wrote:
Cheers Bruce.
I dare say the kid's mother wouldn't
Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If anyone on the list wants it, $70.00 plus shipping will do it.
If it were the VS1 70-210/2.8-4 QDOS version, it's a deal... g
What's the QDOS version?
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
With an f2.8 or faster lens, they are brilliant. Very sharp, and focus
very quickly on my z-1p.I used to have a Sigma 1.4x that was nowhere
near as good as the Pentax. The sigma was very soft, and dimmed the
viewfinder image unacceptably.
Buy the Pentax. You will not regret it.
Cheers
Shaun
Hi Alan,
I disagree with almost everything you say about the
43mm ltd. Actually, the 43mm ltld. is a really special
lens. The question is rather if you like it's
characteristics or not. But that is a totally
different matter ...
Guess I just can't stand the bright-edge bokeh of the
43. :)
Best money you could spend with a beast that size is a good tripod and
ball head. Good balls are hideously expensive (no pun intended), but
worth it. I have used an Arca Swiss B1 a fair bit, but have never been
able to justify the expense. By the time you get hold of the ball, and
4-5 plates
- Original Message -
From: David Brooks
Subject: Re: Re: My first Ebay!!!
Frank.
I'll apologize for being part of the latest $1 Billion
dollar Government Boondogle.
Sorryg
Dave, tell me you didn't register your guns.
William Robb
I've tried twice to post this now! Here goes a third. Seems to get hung
up halfway through the quoted text, so I won't include it this time
fanfare
I have been using an Epson Stylus Photo EX (prints up to A3) since 1998.
It produces glorious prints using the Epson colour carts and 3rd
- Original Message -
From: Feroze Kistan
Subject: Re: Re[6]: electra studio flash/ring flash
Hi Rob,
So what is the generally accepted opinion?
In a studio setup, for my situtation, 90%
pack shots, and I'm just learning to shoot slides,
will a hand held meter be more accurate than
So the 43/1.9 is on E, for anyone wanting one.
Collin
:(
Is it just me, or does the bokeh on this Noctilux
pic remind you of the 43 Limited?
http://www.alaska.net/~rowlett/images/noctilux/mimi4.htm
R
I am not sure. Unlike those those seen on this picture
(maybe an effect of scanning?) out of focus highlights
produced by the 43 mm ltd. lens seem
BTW, I'm also in IT.
Lotus Notes/Domino, DB2, Java.
It's a pretty bad market right now.
Collin
:(
Great idea. We've done a bit of that unofficially in the past, but a
general call to liquid refreshment and jovial conversation would be a
lot of fun.
Shaun Canning wrote:
Hi Gang,
I know it may sound a bit weird, but why don't we have a Christmas
Party? (or general get together with a few
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
BTW, I'm also in IT.
Lotus Notes/Domino, DB2, Java.
It's a pretty bad market right now.
This is why I want to just move onto a new job market, like digging a
ditch.
Sigh, my company just had a massive equipment failure, and I get the
pleasure of
Collin..
I'm in IT as well.. I am thankful that I have a job... my sympathies - it's
still pretty bad as the numbers would suggest that came out this morning in
the U.S. , hope things pick up soon.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Collin Brendemuehl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Does this mean that you're a Trekkie?
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 20:22:24 +
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
... Post 40, I really don't give a Targ's Tail anymore ...
Cotty
1 - 100 of 177 matches
Mail list logo
