Well, sort of. It's a single component of the frameset I navigated to,
albeit the one with the information of interest. The pisser about it
is that the URL window of my browser never changes from the site's main
page, no matter where I navigate. Instead of being able to copy the
text
Hi,
Just a response to the recent posts on Russian cars. Having
come back from two weeks in western Siberia, I can testify that
Russian cars work very well indeed. The cars never frightened
me at all. Russian driving is something else. No smiley.
As more and more western cars appear, one
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Strret photography seems to be much simpler the less you look like a REAL
photographer [think about Cartier Bresson with a a little Leica back in the
days when REAL photogs used 4X5 Speed Graphics...
My favourite tools
Bruce Rubenstein wrote:
I didn't say it was a knock off and it doesn't matter if
it's similar or
not. It doesn't matter if it has the best interface know
to humanity,
because people don't start with user interfaces, or any
other technical
detail. A digital SLR, for the general population, is
David Harris wrote:
Just to point out that currently there are NO labs in
the UK to process scala, it has to be sent to France
since Joes Basement went bust in January.
Hi David,
Thanks for the reminder. My exposed Scala is building up in
the freezer for when I decide where to have it
More OT stuff about Russian engineering:
I have just acquired a Soviet era compound microscope. Every single control
was frozen solid with hardened grease. It took me a week to get it all to
pieces, cleaned, adjusted and back together. The image is reasonable
considering the objectives and
In bright sunlight the high shutter speeds can be wonderful assets. I
have
speeds up to 1/8000 in pentax and even a 1/12000 in a minolta body.
If you
want to blur your background in a portrait type image in bright
sunlight
you'll need the fast speeds to run f2 range aperatures.
Pentax people:
I bought a 1.7 F Pentax teleconverter because somewhere I heard you could
use it to convert Pentax A lenses to autofocus lenses. I bought it on eBay,
and I think it came from overseas, because I couldn't find it
at any of the mail order houses or any of the local photo shops here
This one time, at band camp,
whickersworld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the reminder. My exposed Scala is building up in
the freezer for when I decide where to have it processed.
By where I probably mean in which European country!
Dunno about Europe, but I get it developed here in
Hello Tony,
the 1.7 F converter covers not the whole range. It can only
focus when you are in some range close to the focus. That depends
clearly on the focal length of the used lens. So the behaviour
you have discribed is normal.
The difference between the automatically found focus and the
Hello John,
well said. I'm also very content with announcement of the
*ist D.
Regards, Hans.
--- whickersworld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bruce Rubenstein wrote:
I didn't say it was a knock off and it doesn't matter if
it's similar or
not. It doesn't matter if it has the best interface know
Hi Tony,
First of all - download the manual for the adapter from the American Pentax
site (it's in the Literature section). The lens should be set on infinity
for most distances, but for some closer focusing distances you have to set
the focus ring near the desired distance. There's a table that
Hi, Chris,
I must say, I must have taken the penis shot out of context. I didn't
realize that it was being contrasted with gory, violent shots. Maybe I just
saw it, and went ballistic.
Had I seen the images you refer to, I'd have been equally (if not more)
bothered.
I've often told friends
on 3/07/03 1:45 AM, Rob Studdert at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please someone send me a picture or two of a silver limited on a black
body,
preferably the MZ-S, so I can see how nice it looks and convince myself
that
I don't really need the black after all...
Sorry Stan, but I'd hate to
Folks, as it is Friday in most parts of the world I feel dutifully obliged to
point out that we have some new toys:
LX #5231369 FA1
100mm F2.8 F macro
35mm F3.5K
KX (choice thereof)
Kind regards from sunny Brighton
Peter
I agree, makes the LX look new again.
--- Stan Halpin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: on
3/07/03 1:45 AM, Rob Studdert at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please someone send me a picture or two of a
silver limited on a black
body,
preferably the MZ-S, so I can see how nice it
looks and convince
On 7 Mar 2003 at 3:34, Tony Gieske wrote:
Coupled with my Pentax 85mm f1.4 A lens, it racks the lens a quarter
inch or so, leaves image blurry. If you hand turn the lens all the way
out to infinity, it bucks back and forth trying to focus. (I'm test
focusing on a TV screen.)
Firstly the
Firstly the light output of a TV is quite low putting you into marginal AF
operation secondly and most importantly the TV image isn't constant, it's
being
constantly updated and is wildly flickering to you cameras AF circuit. No
wonder it's having difficulties. Test it outside in the daylight
See http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=2915705087
Both are for sale. Contact off-line.
And, yes, I still have that new condition 24mm SMC f2.8 I keep trying to peddle.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Butch Black said:
Gregory L. Hansen wrote:
I'm having trouble figuring out why my Kalimar 500mm f/8 reflex lens,
manual, doesn't seem to work.
Pictures I've taken with it seemed grayish, grainy, low contrast,
under-exposed. snip
I would do a couple tests. First, take a good look at
The S3 is still for sale,with 55 f 1.8 and meter,and cases.
I have had a few inquiries but nothing further,so if noone is interested i'll try my
hand
at Ebay.
$60 US plus shipping to North American addresses.
Contact me off list.
Ed,
I do plead guilty for not writing the warning. I learned the lesson and
I won't do it again.
About hypocrisy: hell, it was just a prick. The male fraction of this
list sees such on a daily basis.
Ed Matthew wrote:
Frankly, I found the image obnoxious, but less objectionable than the
fact
Brendan said:
The age old grey snow metering error, the camera
tried to make the snow ( white ) 18 % grey. The low
contrast tho is the lens, the kalimar 500mm F8 is the
same as my vivitar 400mm, low not contrasty flat
shots,
Low contrast lens, huh? I think I'd just about reached that
Hi Rob,
How do you find this particular lens to be suited to street and portrait
photo ?
*WARNING* The following links may lead you to images inducing evil
feelings such as lust and envy:
on 3/07/03 1:45 AM, Rob Studdert at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ken wrote:
U.S. has 3 times the connected population of Japan, and no wonder the camera
mfrs flock to the U.S. market. I understand for example, the Kodak 14n is on
allocation to distributors, mostly in the U.S. and only a very small number
would be trickling into Japan, the second largest
It definitely means that if you are going to sell every camera you make, there is no
use in lowering the price to sell more. You can't buy market share without having
the units themselves to deliver. The correct business approach would be to price the
cameras just low enough to sell every one
Even thou I'm buying from a company?
I've bought a lot of stuff from UK
via ebay and never paid anything but
the selling price.
JCO
I'm thinking about buying a used lens from Camera-Direct in England. My
question is import fees, taxes, etc. will I have to pay here in the US.
thanks
Paul
It has not effect on function, but if you are spending that much on a lens and they
make the matching kind, it's frustrating not to be able to get it. Certainly we care
about colors for cars, although it doesn't effect mileage.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee
yes, I think so. Some of my purchases
even though on ebay, were from UK camera shops.
JCO
-Original Message-
From: Paul Eriksson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 11:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Importing used equipment into the US
Even thou I'm
Well all current lenses are made to match any of our series of our cameras,
so what point are you making?
Ziggy
-Original Message-
From: Pål Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 March 2003 16:39
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Limited camera user interface
Just tell me one
Oh, the turmoil Pentax must be in trying to decide on the final
pricing. Many reasonable scenarios have been put forth.
Bruce
Friday, March 7, 2003, 8:48:24 AM, you wrote:
SD It definitely means that if you are going to sell every camera you make, there is
no use in lowering the price to
Steve wrote:
- Original Message -
It definitely means that if you are going to sell every camera you make, there is no
use in lowering the price to sell more. You can't buy market share without having
the units themselves to deliver. The correct business approach would be to
This is not a camera that will be sold in an electronics store or a
discount house that sells
PS cameras and entry level offering. The *ist D will be available in
Camera Stores. If Pentax
offers a bonus to sales people who sell the thing they will sell more of
them. Never
underestimate the
Steve,
It doesn't matter, I stick a 200mm FA2.8IF on to my MZ-S and I have black
and silver, so what, I can shoot my targets, don't care about the colour
scheme.
Ziggy
It has not effect on function, but if you are spending that much on a lens
and they make the matching kind, it's
All --
Charlotte Camera is one of the places I used to watch
regularly for used gear. Having purchased a few things
earns me a monthly visit from their e-mail newsletter.
The lead story:
Industry Notes
We just got back from the PMA (Photo Marketing
Association) Convention in Las Vegas so
Is this coming from the kidnapped Pål?
Well all current lenses are made to match any of our series of our cameras,
so what point are you making?
Ziggy
Just tell me one thing, why does the camera have to match the lens,
are we talking about colour, you know the sexy thing?
No idea why
Ah. Well, I saw the $1600 price here on the list as well, but I've heard
nothing about it elsewhere, so I don't know how solid that guess is. Since
the specs for the camera have not been finalized, I'd say it would be
difficult to predict what the price will be.
At 11:34 AM 3/7/03, you wrote:
Thanks a lot,
Pauls
yes, I think so. Some of my purchases
even though on ebay, were from UK camera shops.
JCO
_
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
I have a Motor Drive LX with NiCad pack for sale. I purchased the motor off
eBay about a year ago with plans to buy a third LX. I mounted and tested the
drive with 4-5 rolls of film, and it worked perfectly. It is very clean,
with only a little rub on the screw that holds the rewind lever on. The
Nevertheless, if a camera is expected to sell out without yet having a set
price, it's foolish to suggest the camera should be sold cheaper than it
could be.
At 11:38 AM 3/7/03, Pål wrote:
Not to be negative but hardly any digital camera is made for meeting
demand. Nothing scare the
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Steve Cottrell wrote:
Who is this person sending these messages? Steve WHAT? WHO Cottrell?
It cannot be, we all know your name is _really_ Cottington! Perhaps
Cottington Cottrell, or Cottington Steve Cotrell... hmmm..
--
http://www.infotainment.org - more fun
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Caveman wrote:
About hypocrisy: hell, it was just a prick. The male fraction of this
list sees such on a daily basis.
Every time I look in a mirror.
;)
--
http://www.infotainment.org - more fun than a poke in your eye.
http://www.eighteenpercent.com-
Ooooh, Ooooh, that implies you don't wear anything, (not an image I wanted
to have).
At 12:23 PM 3/7/2003 -0500, you wrote:
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Caveman wrote:
About hypocrisy: hell, it was just a prick. The male fraction of this
list sees such on a daily basis.
Every time I look in a mirror.
Didn't something similar happen when the Mz-5 (US: ZX-5) was
introduced?
I remember the major dealers here in Oslo being very enthusiastic
about the camera, even though they are all very nikon and canon
biased. One dealer said I never thought Pentax as a brand could come
back like that.
Jostein
You think they really been at the PMA?
On Friday 07 March 2003 17:10, Stephen Moore wrote:
All --
Charlotte Camera is one of the places I used to watch
regularly for used gear. Having purchased a few things
earns me a monthly visit from their e-mail newsletter.
The lead story:
Industry
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Peter Alling wrote:
Ooooh, Ooooh, that implies you don't wear anything, (not an image I wanted
to have).
Especially if you've seen me!
--
http://www.infotainment.org - more fun than a poke in your eye.
http://www.eighteenpercent.com- photography and
Here's a nice item I relisted at a lower price:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemcategory=4688item=2915383109
For you istD fans it would have same view as
a 67-187 35mm lens which is pretty close to
a typical 70-200.
In any case, I already have two of these ( both
screw K) and it's
Tony,
Last summer, I had a jolly good time at the PDMLUK-event shooting
flying Spitfire planes with the A*400/2.8 and the F-1.7TC.
The converter did a very good job combined with that particular lens,
but I have had some other good experiences too. Like with M-200/4,
A-50/1.7 and K-135/2.5 to
Jeff i looked at the Vivitar 285hv and there is a double male
socket on the side of the flash.Would you think this is the socket that would connect
to the F.
Dave
You're welcome.
Jeff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all.
Think its a bit late for body re-design. There is one more body to come not
so. I really do love my MZS, nice weight, feel and size. Anyone can remember
what the general opinion was when that model was released?
I have to say looking a bit like your competition isn't too bad. I suppose
some parts
Peter wrote:
Pål this is a very strange arguement. So you mean to
tell me that you'd be happier of Pentax released a
special, sexy' incompetent camera?
Pentax recently marketed stylish camera with old technology. Now they market ugly or
derivative cameras with new technology. I think it is
From the online BJPMORE NEWS...
=
Pentax unveils first digital SLR
Pentax has delivered on a promise to unveil its first digital SLR camera
this year. Having abandoned plans to introduce a full-frame sensor
model, the Japanese manufacturer began
Feroze wrote:
If you were looking for something as revolutionary as that new phone that
looks
like a klingon car alarm remote than I think Pentax would have lost more
potential new buyers that way. Imitating a proven design is not a bad
business decision especially when you in the business
Peter wrote:
Expected to arrive in July, the ist D delivers a 6.1m pixel
resolution from a 23.5x15.7mm sensor, and may cost as little as 0
without a lens, according to one UK spokesman.
At that price some may even forgive how it looks and the fact that it is a Pentax.
Pål
Pål is an advanced user who has had top notch Pentax gear for many
years. There aren't many left of that breed, but what they want is
basically for Pentax to grow big enough to renew their range of top
gear at a pace more comparable to Nikon and Canon.
Being beyond the entry-level stuff myself,
Well, hell sigh me up for a dozen!
At 02:44 PM 3/7/2003 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
and may cost as little as 0
snip
Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend.
Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read. --Groucho Marx
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. In my eyes, the ist D is not ugly at
all. Innovative design? Maybe not, but still good looking with a finish
that reminds me of the MZ-S with its leather like grip and black spackled
top plate parts. We still have to wait for performance reports to pass
At 02:58 PM 3/7/2003 -0500, you wrote:
Well, hell sigh me up for a dozen!
That should have been sign. (Damned spell checker).
At 02:44 PM 3/7/2003 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
and may cost as little as 0
snip
Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend.
Inside of a dog, it's too
Paul,
No import duties. The rules are any 35mm camera equipment is duty free. Have Peter at
Camera Direct mark it Used 35mm Camera Lens.
Once they charged me a $5 duty on a $100 ME Super from Germany plus an extra $10 in
handling for the postal service to collect it. (They didn't even open
That is sad. I'd visit when I was in town. My FA24/2, AF500T Flash, and later my
A*85/1.4 all came used from there.
Bob S. near Chicago
In a message dated 3/7/2003 1:29:43 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Charlotte Camera has changed ownership and is not nearly as
good
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, [iso-8859-1] Pål Jensen wrote:
Good looking products are always well received whatever. Derivative
ones, particularly stylistically chaotic cut and paste designs, rarely
succeed to the same extent.
It IS good looking..if your idea of good looking is SMALL. Guess what?
Lots
First of all, I don't know how trustworthy this info is!!!
Pentax will release three new wide angles this fall
1. 18-35mm f/3.5-5.6 (the lens the *ist D was shown with at the PMA)
2. Pro??? 16-35mm f/2.8 or 3.5
3. 16mm f/?
Second there is also a potential problem with non A lenses and the white
Yes, either you follow the establishment, learn from their mistakes to see
what works and what dosn't. To have to go it alone with a truly unique
design not only requires guts but a lot money to back you up if you fail.
Many companies have crashed by putting a large chuck of money into
developing
Nick wrote:
I'm thrilled to hear this but is it mentioned anyplace?
I'm not sure about it. Can anyone get this confirmed? The reason is that I know for a
fact that the *ist and *ist D was originally designed with only full functionality
with A, F, FA and FA J lenses. However, things might
Hi PDMLers,
Yet another thread on this...
So, I returned to the group after some months not reading it, and
found out about the new *ist D. If the price is below/around $2000, I
am going to seriously consider getting one to use with my K and M
lenses. As much as I love Tri-X, I'm ready to kiss
The white balance and non electronic lenses? humm it
is possible but I only see slight inaccuracy in the
white balance or the need to set it manually ( point
at white wall as the white point. ).
--- Paul Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: First
of all, I don't know how trustworthy this info
Feroze wrote:
Yes, either you follow the establishment, learn from their mistakes to see
what works and what dosn't. To have to go it alone with a truly unique
design not only requires guts but a lot money to back you up if you fail.
This is getteing rather tedious. I'm not suggesting
Juan wrote:
Is it the camera fomerly known
as the replacement for the MZ-D?
Yes it is and it is everything Pentax indicated it would be.
Pål
gfen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It IS good looking.
snip
*Very* few people are going to base the purchase of a $1500.00 camera on
how it looks. Especially in the first year when it seems likely there
will be a waiting list to get the *ist-D.
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
Full functionality, no. ALL PENTAX LENSES are usable, with the same
restrictions as K, M, and 645 and screwmount lenses have on the newer
bodies. In other words, all Pentax lenses will work as well on the *ist
models as they do on the PZ-1p and MZ-S. Consider it confirmed to this
extent.
Bill
Smaller than the MZ-S and with AA batteries in the camera itself seems
pretty darned innovative to me.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 3:47 PM
Subject: Re: No respect (again...)
Dick wrote:
Beauty is
SN 5304xxx Cosmetics EX Mechanically perfect $400.
Complete CLA with new shutter curtains 16 months ago.
I give you a 4 months warranty and a free LX case.
Andre
--
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Mark Roberts wrote:
gfen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It IS good looking.
snip
I'm a little bothered that you completley took that out of context, and
the fact that its a direct response to Pal stating its not a good looking
camera and derivitive trash.
Truth be told, I don't
David Blowin' by Andre Langevin;
Great composition and use of framing (and rule of thirds). First time I've
seen a soprano sax shaped like that. Tri X does well in contrasty lighting.
Thanks Butch for taking the time for commenting all the pug's pictures!
The sax shape is indeed uncommon. I
Paul wrote:
2. Pro??? 16-35mm f/2.8 or 3.5
3. 16mm f/?
I'll say they are likely. The rumor mill say the good things comes in fall. With pro
grade lenses could follow the cameras above the *ist. Pentax did announce an 18/2.8 to
the distributors. That must have been a couple of years ago. It
Just figured I'll sum up what I learned. Please let me know if I am
still mistaken somewhere...
MZ-30 and MZ-60 (ZX if you pref) will not work with my manual aperture
lenses. - these are out of the Q.
The MZ-3 and MZ-5n has the best feel for someone who is used to the dial
on the MX, K-1000,
gfen wrote:
I'm a little bothered that you completley took that out of context, and
the fact that its a direct response to Pal stating its not a good looking
camera and derivitive trash.
Good looking is in the eye of the beholder. But it does not look original and
distinctive and I believe
Bill wrote:
Full functionality, no. ALL PENTAX LENSES are usable, with the same
restrictions as K, M, and 645 and screwmount lenses have on the newer
bodies. In other words, all Pentax lenses will work as well on the *ist
models as they do on the PZ-1p and MZ-S. Consider it confirmed to
Stan wrote:
Please someone send me a picture or two of a silver limited on a black body,
preferably the MZ-S, so I can see how nice it looks and convince myself that
I don't really need the black after all...
Reply:
Silver lenses on black bodies look as good as black lenses on silver bodies.
In my opinion, black Limited lenses doesn't look more exclusive than an A
series lenses whereas silver Limiteds looks expensive. I also suspect that
silver Limiteds are more durable in finish.
I honestly don't feel my silver LIMITEDs are very duriable in finish. :(
regards,
Alan Chan
and may cost as little as 0
Well, hell sigh me up for a dozen!
I'm even willing to pay 50-100% more for it... :))
L
I was told once that used cameras and lenses Made in Japan didn't require
tax when imported into US. At least that's what the eBay buyer told me. Just
marked the parcel Used camera/lens, Made in Japan would do.
regards,
Alan Chan
I'm thinking about buying a used lens from Camera-Direct in
Alan wrote:
I honestly don't feel my silver LIMITEDs are very duriable in finish. :(
Thats pretty amazing as I have never sen more durable finish even after being carried
around along with other metal lenses. No scratches.
Pål
Levente -Levi- Littvay wrote:
The *ist has the best (most sophisticated) autofocus and the prism is
some new bright one which sould be very cool. Also it can shoot more
pics per sec. (2.7)
I thought only the *ist D had a prism, the *ist was a mirror?
Why does the SMC-A 100/2.8 sell for significantly more than the SMC-A
135/2.8? Does the former have better optics than the latter or is it
just that the former is more convenient for portrait work?
--
David Barts
Portland, OR
Sorry Stan, but I'd hate to see you make a terrible mistake :-)
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~geroc/02-P3032977m.JPG
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~geroc/01-P3032974m.JPG
Wwoww, that grip looks AWSOME. Having the tsandard grip and a motor
drive always scared me. (possibly one of the
Stan wrote:
Please someone send me a picture or two of a silver limited on a black body,
preferably the MZ-S, so I can see how nice it looks and convince myself that
I don't really need the black after all...
bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla
Reply: bla bla bla bla bla bla
Reply:
The MZ-5, and the rest of the MZ series was the most significant (from a
brand/marketing POV) camera that they introduced since the A series.
It's sold better than any other AF models that they had, and even made
them a viable brand to 3rd party lens makers again. They just rested on
their
- Original Message -
From: Pål Jensen
Subject: Re: Help needed (longish)- Silver Limited on black body?
Silver lenses on black bodies look as good as black lenses on silver
bodies.
In my opinion, black Limited lenses doesn't look more exclusive than an A
series lenses whereas silver
- Original Message -
From: Pål Jensen
Subject: Re: *ist D price issues (WAS: Re: *Ist focusing issues)
This is getteing rather tedious. I'm not suggesting pentax should make a
weirdo design. Their history is full of great industry design that are
individual, have character and have
Hi, I have a few things for sale. Anyone interested, please contact me off line. I
have pictures I can email and better descriptions.
Jim
K1000 EX condition, but with inaccurate meter $50
M 50mm f1.7 EX condition $35
A 70-210 f4 EX condition $80
Traceflex - a plastic Diana clone in EX+ to mint-
I just call'em as I see'm, but I still think Pentax, USA sucks (I think
all the women on the list have already put me on their kill list).
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which is even more strange becuase BR has well, um, been almost, sorta
POSITIVE about the latest Pentax news and product
Ok folks,
Here's the scenario.
I shot a number of baby pics about 3-4 months ago for a young mother and her
husband. I know them via her (the young mother's) mother-in-law.
I fired off about 24 color 6x6's and 36 BW and 24 Color 35mm shots. I did
a lot because the kids were super fidgety -
Many more 135 lenses were sold than 100mm lenses. Supply and demand. BTW
the 100mm has a reputation for much better optics than the 135.
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why does the SMC-A 100/2.8 sell for significantly more than the SMC-A
135/2.8? Does the former have better optics than the
No. Only the Kodak and the Canon EOS 1Ds are full frame. The Nikon D1x
is something less but I'm not sure what. The Oly is 4/3 inch and the
rest are APS sized.
Regards,
Anthony Farr
- Original Message -
From: Nagaraj, Ramesh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nice work.
Does all cameras have same
I never give an unedited set of pictures to anyone. Don't let clients
get confused with too many choices. Certainly don't let them know that
you take anything other than great shots.
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My question to all of you:
How do YOU handle your proofs when handing them back to
I was buying film today, and noticed that Downtown Camera here in
Toronto is selling Agfa APX (bw 400) for $3.00 Cdn for a roll of 36. I
asked them what it was like, and they said quite grainy. I asked if
it was a lot grainier than TriX, and he just said again, quite grainy.
OTOH, when I looked
Not even close. The 135 actually has a rather poor reputation, the 100
is rare enough that I don't think I've ever heard of anyone having one.
At 09:50 PM 3/7/2003 -0500, you wrote:
are they even the same optical design except just scaled differently?
JCO
-Original Message-
From: Peter
I've never done any printing myself, but I was reading
about making contact prints from negatives, and it would
seem unnecessary to use an enlarger for this purpose.
It seems you'll just need a contact frame and a way to
shine light onto it. Of course I don't know how you'd
control the exposure
On 8 Mar 2003 at 4:53, Anthony Farr wrote:
For those who were wondering how the *ist D (and the Olympus
4/3)compared in size to some other DSLRs, I've put a compilation up on
Photo.net at:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=1348629photo_sel_index=2#ph
oto
The *ist D is the only
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
