Uhhh.
Are you saying that I could have landed in trouble from taking
pictures like these?
In theory, yes. I know of no case when anyone has been prosecuted
under the law but I have heard of film being confiscated.
Nice shots, BTW.
Gary J Sibio
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lovely shot Tom.
Makes my macro lens hunt easier now.:-)
Dave
*ist D FA 100 f/2.8 Macro
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3795076
Comments appreciated.
Tom C.
At 01:48 PM 11/19/2005, you wrote:
There must be some fine print in that law --
certainly covered bridges
and such are much photo'ed
I doubt that the law is enforced very often. I've never heard of
anyone being arrested for taking a photo and I've only heard two or
three accounts of people
Has an Abby Road feel to it.
Good job as always.
Dave
On the prowl with the Pentaxians on
Saturday in San Francisco, I
spied this scene...
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/40.htm
Comments, critique, flames all appreciated.
I cannot access the original, but i like the new version any way.:-)
Interesting subject and conversion Bruce.
Dave
Based on crop suggestions from Joe Tainter
and Bill Robb, I have
submitted a modified version of the original.
Here is the new cropped
I like it.
Not sure why, but i do.:-)
Dave
Another from the Norcal meet:
http://www.alpert.com/marco/pdml/peso26.html
Comments, as always, welcomed.
-Marco
At 04:27 PM 11/19/2005, you wrote:
I have ACDSee 5.1 and it lets me edit the EXIF and IPTC data, but I
can't find a way to get it to do batch processing of the EXIF and IPTC
data.
Just select the pictures you want to edit the metadata on and then
select the option for editing the EXIF. I
At 03:40 PM 11/19/2005, you wrote:
Sounds like an urban legend to me. I'd be very interested in learning
the statute number.
http://www.krages.com/ThePhotographersRight.pdf
I did a little searching on Google and found another comment by the
same lawyear your link goes to but I also found
Very nice. Cute shot.
Dave
Preparing for the coming PUG I got this shot near the convent Fahr in
Switzerland but decided later to submit another :-)
Taking my Teddy for a ride will never be useless:
Nice composition and colours.
I like the small to larger arangement
Dave
Wandering around shopping for groceries the
other day and the produce
market has their annual pumpkin stuff out front... I thought this was
seasonally appropriate, if
Nice gallery Bruce.
I like the view with the water falls and the lunch shot.
Dave
I have gathered together a little gallery of
my street attempts at
our recent outing.
Enjoy...
http://www.daytonphoto.com/Galleries/NorCalSF/index.htm
--
Bruce
Very steady pan shot Glen.g
Nice BTW
Dave
I shot this recently with my *istDS, while
hiking near my home. He was a
very patient subject. ;)
http://webpages.charter.net/glenweb/gallery/Charlie.html
Except for resizing, this shot is unedited. Any
Great shot Paul.
I like the tilt and the intensity of the little guitar player.
Dave
Stopped by the farmer's market in Birmingham,
Michigan this morning.
Snapped a few pics of this country gospel singer and his young partner.
*istD, DA 50-200 at 80mm,
Yes they do look like eye brows.
I like the background and the light caught in the hairs.
Nice
Dave
For several mornings, I have observed these
particular plants with the
intention of capturing them in good light. I finally went out and did
the task.
I haven't seen anything on the news about it here. The first I heard was
your email about it. Since the final is today (in 20 minutes), there may be
a short piece about it on London's local news programmes, but I wouldn't
expect anything more than that.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original
That's funny. It made the news here last night.
Apparently one of the better players can speak conversational
English...he's just memorised a lot of words.
Dave
On 11/20/05, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't seen anything on the news about it here. The first I heard was
your email
Hi guys,
This is one of the first photos taken with my new ist-DL. It's a weed -
a thistle. Just love the flowers they produce, though.
I like the DL. Easy to handle, and hasn't taken too long to get using
with a little confidence. I'm blissfully ignorant of the D and DS, so I
can't
it sounds highly unlikely to me, unless there is a safety-critical version
of Windows that we don't know about, in which case it's unlikely to have
crashed to a blue screen anyway. In most countries, and I can't imagine that
the US would be any different, safety-critical software is compiled with
I can't decide which RAW converter is the best. I have tried the
latest Adobe beta and Pentax.
Adobe has more options like noise and color fringing reduction. The
white balance settings drive me nuts. Only As Shot or Manual are
usable. Adobe RAW would be nice since it allows me to convert PEF to
Why are only As Shot or Manual usable? Is the color temp slider
unavailable? That gives you far more precise control. What about the
other settings in the drop down menu, like cloudy, fluorescent, and so on?
Are they unavailable to you? If the settings show in the menu, in what way
are the
Just thought I'd post a heads up for Aussie lister's. There's a Doco
on ABC tonight at 11:30 about photographer Lewis Morely. Probably
best known for his shot of Christine Keeler:
The image:
http://www.vam.ac.uk/images/image/1695-popup.html
The story behind it:
If I use the same RAW shot (in camera as Daylight, should be Cloudy)
and select Cloudy in Pentax RAW I get exactly what I want. In Adobe
RAW I must select manual and use the sliders. Cloudy in Adobe would
result in wrong colors. Maybe I am missing something in the settings
of Adobe RAW. Do I need
I like 35. Excellent framing here provides a unique p´rspective.
Paul
On Nov 20, 2005, at 12:44 AM, Arturo Medina wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3891535
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3891436
Hi,
Not sure about the merits of these ones.
When I took them, the
http://www.gcn.com/16_29/news/32083-1.html
http://www.gcn.com/17_17/news/33727-1.html
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 5:42 AM
Subject: RE: IE bashing -- was Re: full size img taken w/12-24
it
Thanks David. Turns out the little guy just wandered into the scene. He
didn't know the guitar player. His dad was standing nearby, though, and
he asked me if I got any good shots. Sold him three prints just the
other day. Turns out he owns an ad agency, so I'm hoping to get some
work from
wrong by what criteria? the Pentax RAW is designed to recreate exactly what
the presets are in the camera. if you leave Adobe Camera RAW to As Shot,
you'll get the camera preset. if you change it to the Adobe Cloudy, you will
get what Adobe defines that to be. there isn't a standard for these
The Adobe PSCS and PSCS2 converters are far superior the the Pentax
version. No contest. White balance is infinitely adjustable by means of
a slider scale. Shouldn't be a problem. An eyedropper is also provided.
You can eyedropper a white object in the scene and dial in your color
on the
Well, that amazes me. I don't hold out much hope for the US Navy.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Herb Chong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 November 2005 12:32
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: IE bashing -- was Re: full size img taken w/12-24
On 20 Nov 2005 at 12:56, Jack Isidore wrote:
If I use the same RAW shot (in camera as Daylight, should be Cloudy)
and select Cloudy in Pentax RAW I get exactly what I want. In Adobe
RAW I must select manual and use the sliders. Cloudy in Adobe would
result in wrong colors. Maybe I am missing
My standards :) which I wouldn't recommend.
I must say the RAW files I'm working on now are badly exposed shots of
people in mist. Almost everything is grey. The camera was on Daylight
and selecting cloudy in Pentax RAW more or less saves the pictures.
Adobe Cloudy results in purple mist, Pentax
In a message dated 11/20/2005 2:55:14 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I can't decide which RAW converter is the best. I have tried the
latest Adobe beta and Pentax.
Adobe has more options like noise and color fringing reduction. The
white balance settings drive me nuts. Only
Almost 1 year ago, my LG 17 CRT 'collapsed'. Since
the LCD size that I really like (19) was too
expensive at that time, I went for a new 17 CRT. I
chose a Samsung (SyncMaster 793) with a flat screen
(not rounded) and good specs (refresh rate, dot
size,...) that went for the equivalent of about
Shel Belinkoff a écrit :
While I have absolutely no interest in this lens, I read your report
anyway, mostly to occupy time while waiting on the phone.
Your report is well written, held my interest, and seems to cover most
anything anyone would want to know. It was enjoyable to read as well as
Gary Sibio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 03:40 PM 11/19/2005, you wrote:
Sounds like an urban legend to me. I'd be very interested in learning
the statute number.
http://www.krages.com/ThePhotographersRight.pdf
I did a little searching on Google and found another comment by the
same lawyear
I think you got all the scene had to offer. NICE!
Jack
--- Peter McIntosh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
This is one of the first photos taken with my new ist-DL. It's a
weed -
a thistle. Just love the flowers they produce, though.
I like the DL. Easy to handle, and hasn't
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 11/19/2005 7:54:11 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Don't bother with the sleight of hand, just comply and erase the card.
Then before you take any more photos switch cards and use recovery
software on the first card, even a
Paul Sorenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
graywolf wrote:
LOL! Nitrocellulose, AKA, gun cotten is classified as an explosive.
BTW they use it for paint too. Gives a much nicer look than Acrilics
paint does. It is still the preferred finish for guitar and other
instrument sound boards as it
I love the compositional idea at the first one. It really tells a story
about a boy and his kite. I wish I was eight again ;-)
Take me to the moon. (Where do I have that song line from?)
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
I've had no problems getting it to recover .pef files in the past Mark.
I though the same as you when I first ran the program. Out of
desperation I had it search for .nef (D1H/D1x) files. It recovered the
files, I then changed the extension to .pef. Works like a charm. All
exif data retained.
I
David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've had no problems getting it to recover .pef files in the past Mark.
I though the same as you when I first ran the program. Out of
desperation I had it search for .nef (D1H/D1x) files. It recovered the
files, I then changed the extension to .pef. Works
Try RAWshooter Essentials:
http://www.pixmantec.com/products/rawshooter_essentials.html
It's free and excellent.
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
Hi Jack,
I don't like the Pentax software. I find it very difficult to get a
reproducable result, and the interface seem clumsy. If Adobe is your
other choice, you should go for it.
However, there are other raw converters out there, if you're
interested. CaptureOne from PhaseOne is one
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Reese) wrote:
My dentist was carted of to prison for photographing his patient's
bridgework.
They took a bite out of crime?
I hope everyone who reads this thread braces themselves for more of this
sort of thing...
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
Is anyone happy using Adobe Elements 4 and Adobe Raw converter?
What about RawShooter?
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 5:38 AM
Subject: RE: Which RAW converter?
Why are only As Shot or Manual
Thanks to all for the offer of help.
Gonz, I bet you don't know what I want, I'll post the auction results when
it's over
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Gautam Sarup
Subject: RE: another harassment by police story
From: Ann Sanfedele [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
They never check my back pack on the subway
though.
You're a lady. It would be really silly to
think you were up to something no good.
Mark Stringer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is anyone happy using Adobe Elements 4 and Adobe Raw converter?
What about RawShooter?
I use both. I use RAWshooter for batches and Adobe Camera RAW for
individual images (critical work).
I use Camera RAW in Photoshop CS2, not Elements, but it's the same
No, but the reviews were good, I'm sure that if there were gross
problems they would have been mentioned.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I've not seen any prints or full-rez web images. Have you?
Shel
You meet the nicest people with a Pentax
[Original Message]
From: P. J. Alling
Ok, Mark...
{myself}
Done.
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 3:59 PM
Subject: Re: another harassment by police story
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Reese) wrote:
My dentist was carted of to
Yep,
that's the one I forgot. :-)
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 3:58 PM
Subject: Re: Which RAW converter?
Try RAWshooter Essentials:
Rob,
I will try this. I should have a kodak grey card somewhere. I guess I
have to shoot this greycard under controlled lighting with the
different camera white balance settings. Convert it to neutral gray in
Adobe RAW and save the profile. Correct me if i'm wrong?
Jack
What you are missing is
For those of you who are interested, this morning I got an email from
BH saying that the 77mm in black was available on special order.
Estimated arrival at BH 7-14 business days. I just ordered mine.
This means I should be selling my brand new silver 77mm LTD in a
couple of weeks, provided the new
if there is anything in the image you want rendered truly grey then opening
in Camera Raw and clicking the grey dropper there will make it grey. color
temperature is only one aspect of white balance. there are hue shifts
involved too. Auto in Camera Raw makes a good starting point for many
also provided that you can believe the 7-14 days.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Amita Guha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 10:36 AM
Subject: 77mm Ltd Black available on special order
For those of you who are interested, this
I'm very happy using RSP, the pay version of RSE. Only thing I'm missing is
a tool for CA correction. Quality is good, the tests are good too, and I
find it intuitive (despite no conventional menus).
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Gautam Sarup
Subject: RE: another harassment by police story
From: Ann Sanfedele [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
They never check my back pack on the subway
though.
You're a lady. It would be really silly to
think you were up to
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bill, I could probably do it... if you haven't
already got someone else.
but depends on price of lens...
has this to do with the same thing as you having
problem with the cafepress site?
Anti-canuck sentiment?
what Item is it and what max bid do
I did a group picture of a family I have known for about 30 years last
night.
Roy is one of the people who more or less mentored me into making quality
pictures.
We would go out and shoot the same locations with each other, sometimes
shooting every day for weeks on end, then dissapearing into
On 11/20/05, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've not seen any prints or full-rez web images. Have you?
I haven't, either, but this review has some image quality comparisons
taken with Leica glass.
http://www.imx.nl/photosite/japan/epsonrd1/epsonrd1.html
This one has some 100%
David Savage wrote:
That's funny. It made the news here last night.
Apparently one of the better players can speak conversational
English...he's just memorised a lot of words.
Dave
Oooh you must have seen Adam... He is brilliant
but terminally shy and
awkward - however while memorizing
On 11/21/05, Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Savage wrote:
That's funny. It made the news here last night.
Apparently one of the better players can speak conversational
English...he's just memorised a lot of words.
That should have read can't speak... g
Dave
Oooh you
As a note, unless it is deteriating, or chopped up into fine particles
nitrocellulose is not as bad as it sounds in this thread. You would
probably have a hard time igniting that billiard ball mentioned for
instance. But once burning it would be almost impossible to put out.
graywolf
I'm currently using a Tamron 28-75 f2.8 XR Di on my D, and it's quite
nice (43-115 equivalent). But that lens is known as a better performer
than the Sigma and the Tamron is very inexpensive new. I wouldn't get
the Sigma unless it was significantly cheaper than the Tamron 28-75.
-Adam
Nice shot. Lots of persona comes through. I like it.
Tom C.
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: Pentax Discuss pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Peso: Outake
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 09:58:42 -0600
I did a group picture of a family I have known for
Having used both, I would never pick the Pentax RAW converter for any
serious work.
First: why are you using the Camera Raw beta? Unless it is that the
PEF files you're trying to use are not compatible with CR v3.2, I
would NOT use beta software as a learning tool.
The proper way to use
In a message dated 11/20/2005 2:31:36 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This shot was taken in RAW, converted to highest quality jpeg with
Pentax' tool, then processed (minimally) using Picture Window Pro.
All comments, critiques most welcome.
Oops - the link would help...
Good shot! Lots of character even though he's displaying dark side strap.
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax Discuss pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 9:58 AM
Subject: Peso: Outake
I did a group picture of a family I have known
Is anyone happy using Adobe Elements 4 and Adobe Raw converter?
What about RawShooter?
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 5:38 AM
Subject: RE: Which RAW converter?
Why are only As Shot or Manual
In a message dated 11/20/2005 7:59:45 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Quickie grayscale conversion then some levels adjusting was done.
Meet Roy.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/portraits/b_w9902.html
William Robb
==
Nice portrait. Beginning to think you
Hi G ...
istD and istDS PEF files are compatible with ACR 2.4 and later. Probably
the istDL will work, but I don't know of anyone who's actually tried it.
The DS2 is an even bigger ??
Shel
You meet the nicest people with a Pentax
[Original Message]
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
First: why are
How is the Raw converter crippled by using it with elements instead of CS?
I think this is the point I am trying to discern.
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 11:39 AM
Subject: Re: Which RAW
I just checked @ Adobe. In order to use ACR with the istDS2and istDL, one
must be using ACR 3.3, which is the Beta version. Info about v3.3 can be
found here: http://tinyurl.com/7qx4w
Shel
You meet the nicest people with a Pentax
[Original Message]
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I use Phase One LE. Brilliant tool. Very versatile and can batch process to
results sharing the came calues - good for panoramas ans series.
Regards
Jens
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Godfrey DiGiorgi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 20. november 2005
Hi!
What does *a* mean?
Once upon a time I made rather unpleasant blunder by writing quite few
while it should've been quite a few...
Cropping to a square isn't always the same as composing to fit the square
format, Boris.
Well, of course... You're right... But given a rectangle one can
Yes, ACR v2.4 supports the D and DS PEF files. My question was to ask
whether Jack was using a DL or DS2 and found them incompatible with
ACR v3.2.
- If you're using PSE3-4, you can use ACR v2.4, v3.0, v3.1, v3.2 and
v3.3beta at this point in time.
- If you're using PS CS, you can use ACR
I've heard from a large number of people using PSE3 and 4 along with
ACR. They seem to be satisfied with it.
Similarly, a lot of folks like RawShooter Essentials. I can't
evaluate that one as it does not run on Mac OS X, and I only use Mac
OS X. But from comparison tests I've seen, ACR
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mawz/65160674/
Pentax MX, PanF+ 50 in Rodinal 1:25, 50mm lens (Not sure which one,
think it was the SMC-M 50/2)
-Adam
Mark Roberts wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 11/19/2005 7:54:11 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Don't bother with the sleight of hand, just comply and erase the card.
Then before you take any more photos switch cards and use recovery
software on the
On 11/20/05, Mark Stringer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about RawShooter?
Hmm... is nice, is free (with a quite inexpensive 'pro' version) but
the white balance doesn't seems to match the camera settings. Picasa
(which is not a raw converter) does a much better job imho.
--
Best regards,
William Robb wrote:
I did a group picture of a family I have known for about 30 years last
night.
Roy is one of the people who more or less mentored me into making
quality pictures.
We would go out and shoot the same locations with each other,
sometimes shooting every day for weeks on end,
Excellent.
On Nov 20, 2005, at 10:58 AM, William Robb wrote:
I did a group picture of a family I have known for about 30 years last
night.
Roy is one of the people who more or less mentored me into making
quality pictures.
We would go out and shoot the same locations with each other,
Well, now you're outed. :)
Gautam
-Original Message-
From: Ann Sanfedele [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 7:53 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: another harassment by police story
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From:
Sigma is making at least some of the Olympus-branded lenses for the 4/3
system.
Pentax could make a full-frame SLR but won't I think he meant
DSLR. Copy editing has become a bourgeois concept
Pop Photo, 12/05.
Joe
Do you trust the latches on the carrying case?
Do you lock the latches to prevent accidental opening?
Thanks,
Joe
Its freaky for sure, esp. for those who think that the internet affords
you any sort of privacy.
What I still don't get is why anyone would try and rip someone off for
$25..
check this one out when your done.
http://www.wenzeled.com
Pat White wrote:
Thanks for that posting, Feroze!
The Pentaximaging web site still has the normal page up, with the D Ds
Ds2 and DL listed.
http://www.pentaximaging.com/index.jsp
The new page is to quote from the pentaximaging main page
WWW.PENTAXSLR.COM TARGETS SLR USERS - REBATES UNTIL 2006
Not really special news...
David wrote:
New
Hello Kenneth,
Saturday, November 19, 2005, 3:52:38 AM, you wrote:
KW Check out
KW http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
KW Something a little different from me.
KW All comments solicited
It works very well with that graphic background. Like it as is.
Attila
That'a a very nice first effort.
I hate you, (Frank make a note.)
Peter McIntosh wrote:
Hi guys,
This is one of the first photos taken with my new ist-DL. It's a weed
- a thistle. Just love the flowers they produce, though.
I like the DL. Easy to handle, and hasn't taken too long to get
when i drive around with my 400/2.8, it's in the hard case with the latches
closed but not locked. i would never consider flying with the hard case. i
would rather put it in a very padded soft case and have it with me as
carryon or have the soft case inside a duffle packed solidly with lots of
DSLR is just a shorthand for digital SLR.
I hate the term full frame applied to digital sensor formats. Makes
everything confusing.
Godfrey
On Nov 20, 2005, at 12:40 PM, Joseph Tainter wrote:
Sigma is making at least some of the Olympus-branded lenses for the
4/3 system.
Pentax could
I like it. I more than like it, it is a wonderful photo. What really makes
this work for me is the eyes. I knowing he is a photographer, makes me look
him directly in the eyes, and he looks strait back behind his specs, no
fuzz.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate
But it will, tell it the files are TIFF and it finds them just fine...
(At least it finds PEF files just fine, I have no experience with other
manufactures RAW files).
Mark Roberts wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 11/19/2005 7:54:11 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL
On 20 Nov 2005 at 16:35, Jack Isidore wrote:
Rob,
I will try this. I should have a kodak grey card somewhere. I guess I
have to shoot this greycard under controlled lighting with the
different camera white balance settings. Convert it to neutral gray in
Adobe RAW and save the profile.
Nice thistle!
Looks like you're doing well with the DL. Enjoy it!
I like the DS a lot, it's an amazing performer. The DL is essentially
a slightly less expensive version of the same camera, no reason for
it not to be excellent.
Godfrey
On Nov 20, 2005, at 2:30 AM, Peter McIntosh wrote:
On Nov 20, 2005, at 7:58 AM, William Robb wrote:
.. Meet Roy.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/portraits/b_w9902.html
Nice work!
Godfrey
A web search turns up a mixed bag about the explosive properties of
Nitrocellulose billiard balls, some seem to think that the paints used
to color them might have acted as a primer...
Anyone interested in experimenting?
graywolf wrote:
As a note, unless it is deteriating, or chopped up into
I am awaiting an affordable full-frame digital back about the size of a
Polaroid 545 holder. Full-frame in that sentence means 96mm x 122mm.
Affordable means Graywolf has enough money to buy it. Such words sure
are vague, aren't they?
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof ==
I don't think that Pentax tells everything to Keppler, at least not
anymore...
Joseph Tainter wrote:
Sigma is making at least some of the Olympus-branded lenses for the
4/3 system.
Pentax could make a full-frame SLR but won't I think he meant
DSLR. Copy editing has become a bourgeois
Actually, I was expecting a response about like we got when someone
called you Anne. Hum...? Lady Anne? grinning and ducking
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
William Robb wrote:
- Original
Well Gee, this looks very familiar, something I posted a few months ago.
http://www.mindspring.com/~webster26/PESO_--_gardenspot.html
Adam Maas wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mawz/65160674/
Pentax MX, PanF+ 50 in Rodinal 1:25, 50mm lens (Not sure which one,
think it was the SMC-M 50/2)
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
