Just a short notice for you to know that Pentax website is now
www.pentax.jp (instead of pentax.co.jp) and has been slightly change
(on a cosmetic POV). It might lead to a better website design in the
future hopefully.
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
Photo:
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/04/08 Tue AM 11:05:13 GMT
To: Pentax Discuss pdml@pdml.net
Subject: OT request for browser help
I have several emails this morning stating that they cannot access my
hockey picture
page on my site.
I know Safari and Firefox can open
Not true. The list is moderated. It is done so carefully that it just
_looks_ like it is unmoderated. A rare and welcome talent.
That's what you think. Truth be told, Doug deletes every 48th email just
for kicks (hence the were are my post? whines... and he uses a thrown
dart system to
From: Jerome [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In general though, the response of the group has been eye opening for me
as well, and I agree with most points that were made. And since I do enjoy
the banter and spiraling turns that the list often takes due to the
freedom of being unmoderated, I guess the
I went to a dinner at a very nice, and rather expensive, German
Restaurant. It used to actually import wait staff from Germany, but
that's become too expensive recently so most of the current staff are
from further East, but all speak, (AFAICT), fluent German. Except this
guy, he's a local,
Looks like my K10D won't make it back in time for Erins awards day on
Sunday, so its istD and 360.
Is anyone, or has anyone used this combo. I'm sure it works fine.
I'll run a few tests today, but any pro cons on this combo.
Dave
--
Equine Photography
www.caughtinmotion.com
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 9:26 PM, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm forced to agree.
This is what comes from using lenses on a test bed instead of in the
real world.
I only ever resort to this kinda' testing if my real world shots show
optical deficiencies.
Cheers,
Dave
From: Jos from Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Missing an opportunity is much
worse for me than not having the best optical quality
Mark!
-
Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam
--
PDML
Thanks Mike.
I wrote this my self, as you may have guessed, and di a lot of cut and paste.
I'll have a look at those table things
Dave
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 4:39 AM, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/04/08 Tue AM 11:05:13 GMT
He better watch out then, now he's in trouble with Ann...
David J Brooks wrote:
He kicks cats to, so there, it is properly moderated.
Dave
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 5:22 AM, Jerome [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not true. The list is moderated. It is done so carefully that it just
_looks_
From: Jerome [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/04/09 Wed AM 09:22:05 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESOs??
Not true. The list is moderated. It is done so carefully that it just
_looks_ like it is unmoderated. A rare and welcome talent.
That's what you
He kicks cats to, so there, it is properly moderated.
Dave
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 5:22 AM, Jerome [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not true. The list is moderated. It is done so carefully that it just
_looks_ like it is unmoderated. A rare and welcome talent.
That's what you think. Truth be
I think that the materials legislation implemented in EU a couple of
years ago hit Pentax very hard. Something to do with Bromine-based
flame-retardants in the plastics used in their lenses.
Jostein
2008/4/9 P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Interestingly enough the last 7 35mm film cameras
Interestingly enough the last 7 35mm film cameras Pentax made are listed
but noted to be discontinued. The medium format cameras are listed but
not discontinued. (The lens situation in Japan seems to be a bit
different than elsewhere in the world as well).
Thibouille wrote:
Just a short
Brian
My favourite reject is the church
http://supera.myjalbum.net/Pentax_Photo_Gallery_Submissions/Declined_Images/slides/IMGP2987pg.html
Not too fussy for me anyway and fantastic lighting
Thanks
Peter
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On this shot I was doing everything wrong. I had the camera and lens
set up for a close focus shot of an early wild flower bloom, (maximum
DOF with the slowest shutter speed I though I could reasonably hand
hold). I was just beginning to compose the shot when there was a
horrendous squawking
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/04/09 Wed AM 12:47:25 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: One lens only...
Steve Desjardins wrote:
Makes you wonder if the Lens Police are going to enforce the one lens
only rule here. I don't know how many
On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 20:47:25 -0400, Mark Roberts wrote
Steve Desjardins wrote:
Makes you wonder if the Lens Police are going to enforce the one lens
only rule here. I don't know how many times we have had a similar
question - I can't answer it because I can't come up with a situation
I like interiors so I've tried walking around with a 8mm Peleng. It's
unlikely that I'll ever be allowed ro stand where I like in the Blue
Mosque in Istanbul again. ( I was with a party of police officers )
More practically the 12-24mm Sigma is good in churches too.
The essential accessory is
I was considering buying a K20D because the low noise 14.6 MP sensor is
particularly attractive. However, the review in this week's Amateur
Photographer was a little disappointing, particularly when referring to purple
fringing.
The review pointed out that a recent optical test of the
Also I'm trying out now Lightroom as possible replacement of Elements on
my new PC. In Elements I used to store my converted (exported) JPG's
along with the DNG files in the same folder. I am used to identify
folders based on subject and subfolders by date taken. Elements does
import from card
From: Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/04/08 Tue PM 07:55:40 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: One lens only...
Op Tue, 08 Apr 2008 21:25:24 +0200 schreef Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 8/4/08, Lucas Rijnders, discombobulated, unleashed:
My wife
I have to put on my glasses and look at it:-).
On Apr 8, 2008, at 11:56 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
I have to say I agree with the other comments, the grass seems to
be in
perfect focus.
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Or a decent shot with an imperfect lens.
I wouldn't have tried to guess from this shot, since it was
continuous autofocus. But it could be backfocused. Once side of the
frame was backfocusing a considerable amount, but not enough to
extend from her head to the grass:-).
Paul
On Apr 8, 2008, at 10:37 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
Looks
That's true. And the autofocus test on the K20D is going to make
Pentax live up to a higher standard. I'm wondering if we won't see it
gone with the next firmware update? I hope not.
Of course I haven't heard of any significant problems with the DA*
50-135, and my copy of that lens appears
Thanks to all who commented.
But this is a bad example of what I was trying to demonstrate.
Looking at it in the morning with glasses on I have to say you're all
correct. The grass is in focus. That's a matter of photographer
failure or continuous autofocus failure rather than the lens being
These cranks/spiders are about 4 or 5 years old, so they're showing
their age (that's not dirt on the arm, it's where the shiny stuff has
worn off). They're still beautiful in my eyes...
http://tinyurl.com/4xk56t
If you ask for a replacement, they pay shipping for the new lens.
However, I generally ask for a refund and order a new one
immediately. That means I have a new lens about a week sooner, but I
pay about twelve dollars more.
My local store stocks only DA lenses, no DA*. They assume all their
Yep! Based on that shot, it would appear your lens is just fine. The
left side would have been noticeably soft if shot with my lens. I'm
hoping that the vast majority of them are just that. I'll have
another on Thursday.
Paul
On Apr 9, 2008, at 12:47 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I shoot
The only type the uneven focus field problem might show up is if your
shooting something where the subject is approximately equidistant
from one end of the frame to the next. That's why this could go
unnoticed for quite a while. I have a number of good shots that I
produced with this lens
Well, you can test for a flat field in minutes. Just shoot the old
brick wall at f2.8. But make sure you're squared off to the wall,
since DOF at that stop is fairly minimal.
Paul
On Apr 9, 2008, at 1:22 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
I'm feeling the same way. Not having done any formal tests with
I love machinery, and the more signs of use, the better. Good work,
nice rendering.
Paul
On Apr 9, 2008, at 8:30 AM, frank theriault wrote:
These cranks/spiders are about 4 or 5 years old, so they're showing
their age (that's not dirt on the arm, it's where the shiny stuff has
worn off).
I have yet to see any purple fringing after 2500 K20D shots. But I
don't shoot black branches against glowing white skies either. In
fact, I've experienced more fringing with all of my other DSLRs. The
*istD was the worst of them.
Paul
On Apr 9, 2008, at 7:54 AM, Colin J wrote:
I was
I returned a defective 540 flash (stuck on 16mm) and an under warranty
K10D (SD slot would not 'hold onto the card). In each case, at their
instruction, I downloaded paid shipping labels and ultimately received
the replaced flash and repaired K10D at no cost.
Jack
--- William Robb [EMAIL
I don't often post architectural photos. Perhaps that's because I
tend to concentrate on other stuff, or perhaps it's because I mostly
suck at it, but today I'm breaking with tradition.
This is my favourite group of buildings in Toronto, The
Toronto-Dominion Centre, designed by noted modernist
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 8:28 PM, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 8, 2008, at 5:40 PM, Bob W wrote:
The use of zooms reeks of moral turpitude.
Bob W wrote:
It's not actually my opinion, it's just a cynical attempt to get on
the quotes list before the snow melts.
- Original Message -
From: Colin J
Subject: K20D Review in Amateur Photographer
I was considering buying a K20D because the low noise 14.6 MP sensor is
particularly
attractive. However, the review in this week's Amateur Photographer was a
little
disappointing, particularly when
- Original Message -
From: John Whittingham
Subject: Re: One lens only...
Now let's have someone use it in a quotation worthy of a PDML/NCCF
t-shirt and I'll make it available in the store...
The Lens Police
Is this your lens sir?
The Lens Police dismisseth us.
William
The genie is out of the bottle, as they say. Even if they take the
adjustment away, folks will still be testing lenses and sending them
back. The real question is if there are enough testers who will
return lenses to offset the huddled masses who won't think to do it. If
the economics works,
- Original Message -
From: Steve Desjardins
Subject: Re: DA* 16-58/2.8 and the flat focus problem
The genie is out of the bottle, as they say. Even if they take the
adjustment away, folks will still be testing lenses and sending them
back. The real question is if there are enough
I suddenly have this strange urge for schnitzel. Funny shot.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] 4/9/2008 6:30 AM
I went to a dinner at a very nice, and
Since that's the opposite results others have reported I begin to doubt
the veracity of any review.
Look this is a situation , high contrast, that I would have expected to
cause sensor bloom, and lots of it.
http://www.mindspring.com/~distilfink/PESO%20--%20treeline.html
Made with the
Jerome wrote:
Not true. The list is moderated. It is done so carefully that it just
_looks_ like it is unmoderated. A rare and welcome talent.
That's what you think. Truth be told, Doug deletes every 48th email just
for kicks (hence the were are my post? whines...
I've installed a
On Apr 9, 2008, at 7:05, Henk Terhell wrote:
In LR I see so far no easy way to do thisin the same folder and upon
saving the JPG it is hard to find back the folder in which the DNG
file
is located.
I'm just starting to get the hang of Lightroom myself, but I think one
thing you need to
Colin J wrote:
I was considering buying a K20D because the low noise 14.6 MP sensor
is particularly attractive. However, the review in this week's
Amateur Photographer was a little disappointing, particularly when
referring to purple fringing.
There's your problem. The K20D is targeted at
P. J. Alling wrote:
He better watch out then, now he's in trouble with Ann...
as I was about to write :)
guess who
David J Brooks wrote:
He kicks cats to, so there, it is properly moderated.
Dave
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 5:22 AM, Jerome [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not true. The
Hum, Bike Porn. Hey, wait a minute you didn't spend some vacation time
in England last June...
frank theriault wrote:
These cranks/spiders are about 4 or 5 years old, so they're showing
their age (that's not dirt on the arm, it's where the shiny stuff has
worn off). They're still beautiful
Nicely composed and nice conversion, (I assume). I'll just make my
usual comment about opening up the mid tones just a bit.
frank theriault wrote:
I don't often post architectural photos. Perhaps that's because I
tend to concentrate on other stuff, or perhaps it's because I mostly
suck at
frank theriault wrote:
These cranks/spiders are about 4 or 5 years old, so they're showing
their age (that's not dirt on the arm, it's where the shiny stuff has
worn off). They're still beautiful in my eyes...
http://tinyurl.com/4xk56t
2008/4/9 Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Not amateur photographers. Gees.
Canadians?
No, wait... that's geese. hmm...
Jostein
--
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
frank theriault wrote:
These cranks/spiders are about 4 or 5 years old, so they're showing
their age (that's not dirt on the arm, it's where the shiny stuff has
worn off). They're still beautiful in my eyes...
http://tinyurl.com/4xk56t
On 9/4/08, John Whittingham, discombobulated, unleashed:
The Lens Police
Is this your lens sir?
Put your exposures where I can see them.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML
On 9/4/08, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
The Lens Police dismisseth us.
This is the Lens Police, you're under-exposed.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML
geez I stay off the list for a while and come back and see sharp images
from Frank -- what is the list coming to???
No one will remember what Theraultian blur is if you keep this up
ann
p.s. (nice pic - the closeup is intriguing -- artsy - the otehr is just
an information photo of a bike
I like it
ann
P. J. Alling wrote:
On this shot I was doing everything wrong. I had the camera and lens
set up for a close focus shot of an early wild flower bloom, (maximum
DOF with the slowest shutter speed I though I could reasonably hand
hold). I was just beginning to compose the shot
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:11 AM, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All right pull over, this is the lens police...
All right buddy. Stop down and pull over.
Dave
Ken Waller wrote:
I really like the term lens police!
Now let's have someone use it in a quotation worthy of a
So its not just me then. I thought so to.
Dave
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 11:56 PM, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have to say I agree with the other comments, the grass seems to be in
perfect focus.
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Or a decent shot with an imperfect lens.
I wonder what the former soloist of lens the police would have to say? ;)
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 6:54 PM, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/4/08, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
The Lens Police dismisseth us.
This is the Lens Police, you're under-exposed.
--
Cheers,
Ooh, Good one.
But you missed the triple entender.
This is the Lens Police, you're under developed...
Cotty wrote:
On 9/4/08, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
The Lens Police dismisseth us.
This is the Lens Police, you're under-exposed.
--
Vote for Cthulhu. Why
Good shot. Good detail and its sharp.:-0
Dave
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 8:30 AM, frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These cranks/spiders are about 4 or 5 years old, so they're showing
their age (that's not dirt on the arm, it's where the shiny stuff has
worn off). They're still
Hello,
This email is another try to send a post to the list. Do you received
me and can someone help me?
Gaetan Beauchamp
Le 08-04-09 à 12:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Send PDML mailing list submissions to
pdml@pdml.net
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
It may be you, but you're not unique.
David J Brooks wrote:
So its not just me then. I thought so to.
Dave
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 11:56 PM, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have to say I agree with the other comments, the grass seems to be in
perfect focus.
Paul Stenquist
So all Pentax's literature tells us that Photo Browser will run on Win2K
and Photo Lab isn't available I'm not sure what they mean exactly
since Photo Lab 3.5 seems to be running fine on my Win2k Server system
with SP4 installed. I'm almost afraid to tempt fate by installing the
Remote
I have examples of my DA* lens giving me sub-par real-world results.
Here's the real world image:
http://www.westerickson.net/misc/ValleyOak.jpg
Here are 100% crops of the left, center, and right portions of the image.
Note that some of the grassland on the both the left and right sides is
David J Brooks wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 12:11 AM, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All right pull over, this is the lens police...
All right buddy. Stop down and pull over.
Do you know how fast that lens is?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 9/4/08, Gaëtan Beauchamp, discombobulated, unleashed:
Hello,
This email is another try to send a post to the list. Do you received
me and can someone help me?
Gaetan Beauchamp
Bonjour Gaetan,
You have managed to post to the list fine. Just beware that as you are
subscribed in digest form,
Op Wed, 09 Apr 2008 15:42:57 +0200 schreef Charles Robinson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Apr 9, 2008, at 7:05, Henk Terhell wrote:
I agree that there is tons to learn to use it properly. I've been
playing around with it for the past week and I've just barely
scratched the surface. There are a
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And, while more or less on the subject, is there a way to edit 'maker
notes', especially lens name in the exif? If a shot is by an 'A series
lens' with SR set to 50, I know which one it is. I'd like to store that
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/4/08, Gaëtan Beauchamp, discombobulated, unleashed:
Hello,
This email is another try to send a post to the list. Do you received
me and can someone help me?
Gaetan Beauchamp
Bonjour Gaetan,
You have managed to
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
frank theriault wrote:
These cranks/spiders are about 4 or 5 years old, so they're showing
their age (that's not dirt on the arm, it's where the shiny stuff has
worn off). They're still beautiful in my eyes...
Are we after all, sure that this is Frank. Ann did point out that his
stuff is disturbingly unblurred
David J Brooks wrote:
Nicely done Frank.
The alignment is very pleasing.
You sure it was not Art Van dalay who designed that.
Dave
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 8:56 AM, frank theriault
I've never used it but this says you can use it to edit EXIF information.
http://www.softpedia.com/get/Multimedia/Graphic/Digital-Photo-Tools/EXIFeditor.shtml
I'm not sure but the lens name may be stored as a code of some type
which would be used in conjunction with a Lookup table to display
Nicely done Frank.
The alignment is very pleasing.
You sure it was not Art Van dalay who designed that.
Dave
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 8:56 AM, frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't often post architectural photos. Perhaps that's because I
tend to concentrate on other stuff, or
Op Wed, 09 Apr 2008 19:36:27 +0200 schreef Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
And, while more or less on the subject, is there a way to edit 'maker
notes', especially lens name in the exif? If a shot is by an 'A series
Op Tue, 08 Apr 2008 23:05:59 +0200 schreef Jos from Holland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
One lens only? I would take the widest I have: the 18-55 kitlens, I can
always crop later but never expend! Missing an opportunity is much
worse for me than not having the best optical quality
Greetz, Jos
On
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 1:41 PM, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It may be you, but you're not unique.
There goes my day.:-)
I had that on my business cards, now i have to remove it.
Dave
David J Brooks wrote:
So its not just me then. I thought so to.
Dave
On Tue, Apr
On Apr 9, 2008, at 12:36, Lucas Rijnders wrote:
Op Wed, 09 Apr 2008 15:42:57 +0200 schreef Charles Robinson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Apr 9, 2008, at 7:05, Henk Terhell wrote:
I agree that there is tons to learn to use it properly. I've been
playing around with it for the past week and I've
It could still be just you:-)
Paul
On Apr 9, 2008, at 12:27 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
So its not just me then. I thought so to.
Dave
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 11:56 PM, P. J. Alling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have to say I agree with the other comments, the grass seems to
be in
perfect
Thanks for posting this. Unfortunately it's becoming more and more present
in our lives or in the surroundings. So much pain, and yet so much courage.
Best regards,
Manuel
-Mensagem original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Em nome de Derby
Chang
Enviada: terça-feira, 8
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And, while more or less on the subject, is there a way to edit 'maker
notes', especially lens name in the exif? If a shot is by an 'A series
lens' with SR set to 50, I know which one it is. I'd like to store that
info
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 1:50 PM, frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a more exciting racing sport than the matched sprint? I
don't think so!
cheers,
frank
Rally. Take a overpowered, AWD small car, drive it down a dirt road on
the side of a mountain at well over 100km/h
I like the closeup shot alot Knarf - something about the basic nature of it
the B+W presentation.
I'd like to see a little more space between the chain the RH edge of the
image.
I think we need to add a theme month for the PUG called bikes I have known.
Kenneth Waller
The lens police always PRIMEd and on the lookout to EXPOSE FAST lenses
ZOOMING by
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: One lens only... (Lens police)
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:
On Apr 9, 2008, at 13:48, Adam Maas wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 1:50 PM, frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a more exciting racing sport than the matched sprint? I
don't think so!
cheers,
frank
Rally. Take a overpowered, AWD small car, drive it down a dirt road on
Knarf - I like the subject matter composition but would like a better B+W
rendering (more contrasty ?)
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO - Mies' Masterpiece
I don't often post architectural photos.
Charles answered Henk's original question on point.
Summarizing, Lightroom does not create a JPEG, TIFF or PSD rendering
of a RAW file with your edits until you tell it to explicitly with
the Export function or implicitly with the edit in photoshop... or
edit in another editor commands.
frank theriault wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
frank theriault wrote:
These cranks/spiders are about 4 or 5 years old, so they're showing
their age (that's not dirt on the arm, it's where the shiny stuff has
worn off). They're still
Op Wed, 09 Apr 2008 20:57:57 +0200 schreef Godfrey DiGiorgi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
it such that Lightroom will recognize it. Lightroom recognizes all
Pentax lenses properly now, far as I can tell, given the data that is
available.
I obviously use another class of lenses than you do: My SMC
I'm not sure what you mean by more and more present, but really the
reason this is such a tragedy is that is so unusual for a relatively
young healthy woman to die prematurely. From the 1840's, when good
record keeping became a general to about 1910 statistics show that young
women were very
On Apr 9, 2008, at 12:38 PM, Lucas Rijnders wrote:
it such that Lightroom will recognize it. Lightroom recognizes all
Pentax lenses properly now, far as I can tell, given the data that is
available.
I obviously use another class of lenses than you do: My SMC Pentax-FA
1:4,7-5,6 80-200
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 10:29 PM, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or a decent shot with an imperfect lens.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=7147418
Two things here.
First: I'm training Grace to be a placekicker in the NFL. Note the
perfect form. Hand out for balance. Head
I'm glad to see olde friends on PDML. I have been
unable to follow the list for some time now, mid 2004
actually, and I re-subscribed just today. Apparently
Pentax has a couple of new cameras with nice features
since I last posted...
Anyway, part of the reason I re-upped PDML is I have a
few
Thanks Charles and Godfrey. It is clear that it will need a different
file structure as I'm used to with Elements by just keeping both DNG and
JPG in the same folder.
Henk
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Godfrey DiGiorgi
Sent:
P. J. Alling wrote:
I'm not sure what you mean by more and more present, but really the
reason this is such a tragedy is that is so unusual for a relatively
young healthy woman to die prematurely. From the 1840's, when good
record keeping became a general to about 1910 statistics show that
Lightroom can do that but it's not the best way to organize things IMO.
Godfrey
On Apr 9, 2008, at 1:55 PM, Henk Terhell wrote:
Thanks Charles and Godfrey. It is clear that it will need a different
file structure as I'm used to with Elements by just keeping both
DNG and
JPG in the same
Mustard, you evil b**, you're selling a bunch of stuff on my want
list just when I decided to not buy anything else until I can afford a
K20D. Now I'm going to have to sit here and stew...
John Mustarde wrote:
I'm glad to see olde friends on PDML. I have been
unable to follow the list
On 9/4/08, John Mustarde, discombobulated, unleashed:
I'm sure I'll keep a good set of gear, probably get a
Pentax camera upgrade to my IstD, but I'm really going
to downsize this time
Mark!!
Welcome back John. You got a Tokina 300 2.8 in that lot??? ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
||
Now let's have someone use it in a quotation worthy of a PDML/NCCF
t-shirt and I'll make it available in the store...
The Lens Police
Is this your lens sir?
Now then, sir. Let's just see how wide your aperture can go, shall
we?
(sound of latex...)
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
On 9/4/08, John Mustarde, discombobulated, unleashed:
TOKINA ATX 300/2.8 MANUAL FOCUS MINT W/CASE, BAG.
yes you do :-O
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Yes but the death rates due to so many things that would have killed
people before they had a chance to develop cancer have fallen so much.
Some cancers can even be prevented with vaccines today that have killed
thousands of women in the past. It's getting better, and has been for a
long
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
