Wendy wrote:
The oficial event photographer didn't fare much better and seems
to have made countless photos of Tan's very fuzzy butt!
erm, ok.
Hey Wendy glad you had a great weekend and if you promise to come next year,
I'll promise to wax my butt in preparation!
:-)
tan.
-Original
Frank,
that is some seriously funny, erm, stuff!
You are so crazy. I love crazy! lol.
tan.
-Original Message-
From: frank theriault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 16 June 2004 8:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: GFM: Dans l'Objectif du Lapin Demente
Got back a coupla
Tom Reese wrote:
Tanja - first impression - yep she has several screws loose everywhere
second impression - I underestimated the number of loose screws
Erm, thanks - i think
lol!
It was great to meet you guys too Tom and I agree that there just wasn't
enough time to truly get to know each
next year. You'll find that once you get to know me I'll become screwier,
and less of a photographer. vbg
cheers,
frank THERIAULT vbg
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Tanya Mayer Photography [EMAIL
I second tv's observations Frank! And somehow, I want a copy!
BTW, that last roll of black and white is a bit scary, there are WAY to many
pics of my mug on there!
I do like the shot of me with that huge lens though. But tv informs me that
I'm holding it wrong!
tan.
-Original
Well, what do you all expect?
I *am* just a puny little girl remember?
And I have never really had the chance to hold a, erm, lens that big before!
(and Steve is right btw, if you look at number 29, and you'll see how close
tom is to me, there is no way that lens would focus at that distance.
5689 - Feb 2004, bought in Australia...
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Jan van Wijk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 19 June 2004 2:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: *ist D survey
Hi Dario,
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 11:40:16 -0400 (GMT-04:00), Christian wrote:
In my effort
Cotty gave me some advice on holding big lenses including:
Shooting handheld with long glass, if you can, always brace against
something static like a lamp post or jumbo jet or nuclear flask etc. If
standing free, spread feet apart, draw elbows in to the waist/chest, hold
breath at point of
Well, that's pretty much just what *will* happen after I make a certain move
to a certain new city in a certain new country...
;-)
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 19 June 2004 7:21 PM
To: pentax list
Subject: RE: The Last Two Days
On
Greg, I can't help you with the testing, but I thankyou for the detailed
information comparing the two lenses.
However, I do have a question - how is it that the DA 16-45 will work on
your film camera? I was under the understanding that it was only suited to
the *istD and any other possible
I'm not saying anything more until I have some idea of what exactly is
happening, so sorry Gonz, I guess the answer is yes...
;-)
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Gonz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 21 June 2004 12:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: The Last Two Days
Ok.
without ears.
Hope your hubby isn't reading this list, or he may never allow you to leave
the
house again (GRIN).
--
Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
OMG, I am without words...
--
graywolf
http://graywolfphoto.com/graywolf.html
so clever...
Tan,
Do you mean any situation matching ihaveyourviewfinderrightthere concept?
Not only GFM?
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Tanya Mayer Photography [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Net [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 8:48 PM
Subject: I'm so clever
Shel, that is the coolest thing I have ever seen you post!
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 24 June 2004 4:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PAW - Jesse (Something Different)
I'd like to say that I appreciate everyone's patience
Get a grip antonio, they aren't hurting anyone's feelings with THEIR posts,
and besides, I've been laughing along with them with every post.
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Antonio Aparicio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 25 June 2004 9:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT
O-M-G!! THAT is one cool photo!
What a collection!
Thanks so much for sharing.
:-)
tan.
-Original Message-
From: keller.schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 29 June 2004 6:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: a 'family' photo
I had this idea of taking them all out on
holy crap, man, are you like obsessed or something?
that is the most impressive collection i've ever seen! (well, maybe on a par
with Cesar's)
thanks for sharing, Sven, that is such a cool pic...
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Desjardins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday,
erm, photos please, sir?!? we want to SEE the evidence to back up your
ludicrous claims!
;-)
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Cesar Matamoros II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 29 June 2004 3:45 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss (E-mail)
Subject: A photographic weekend - a!
I have
i wanna come too!!
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Cesar Matamoros II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 29 June 2004 11:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: A photographic weekend - a!
-Original Message-
From: tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June
Frank, I've had it happen to me a couple of times too, wrt your email addy.
:-)
tan.
-Original Message-
From: frank theriault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 30 June 2004 8:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Frank's Hotmail
Hi, Bob,
I know!
I think it's overly
hi everyone,
well, i am not sure if any of you have noticed, but i have been really quiet
on-list since returning from the US. there is alot of heavy stuff going
down in my personal life at the moment, and i am now going to have to
unsubscribe from the list, come tomorrow morning. i will be
2004 11:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: tan unsubscribing...
--- Tanya Mayer Photography [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
hi everyone,
well, i am not sure if any of you have noticed, but
i have been really quiet
on-list since returning from the US. there is alot
of heavy stuff going
down
i disagree with simon here - i *really* prefer the second one! it has very
cool composition and i love the movement in her foot - the way that the
backlight shows the shape of her leg is very sensual too. these are really
cool shots frank, probably my favourite that i have ever seen of yours
lol! personally, if it were me, i would've just said beware, these pics
contain boobies!
btw, i don't think that the baring of any skin in these pics is remotely
offensive, i could however see how the phallic nature and story behind the
pics may be misconstrued by some (not me! hehe)...
tan.
Jostein wrote:
Other than that, I keep telling myself that the creative itch cycles
through
some arbitrary seasons. Sometimes it's hibernating like nature in an arctic
winter, and sometimes it's blooming like high summer.
Now, *that* is a great quote - one for the PDML Hall of Fame, I'd say!!
lol! Mark, that is too funny, I was actually going to say that, but didn't
want you to think I was picking on you!
And btw, Cotty, Mark is correct, Koalas AREN'T bears! so there! hehe
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 13 July 2004 10:47
Just got this in an email, some of you may have seen it, or similar
versions, but thought it was funny and wanted to share...
Sorry, its totally OT!
t.
Dear Tech Support,
Last year I upgraded from Boyfriend 5.0 to Husband 1.0 and noticed a
distinct slow down in overall system performance -
lol, good point Jens!
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Jens Bladt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 14 July 2004 3:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: civil discourse (was Re: PAW: Temptation of Eve, the three
shot series)
It's interesting that the last supper apparently
Erm, I'm not exactly available, I'd appreciate it if you stopped winking
at me, OK?!?!
;-)
btw, my kids just saw Shrek 2 on the weekend, and they think your pic is
hilarious!!
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Keith Whaley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 14 July 2004 8:37 AM
Hohum, I HAD, previous to this, been enjoying this really interesting,
thought provoking, and at times, funny thread. HOWEVER, can't you people
see that us all having different opinions is just the thing that makes the
world an interesting place to live in?!? I probably have extremely
different
: Temptation of Eve, the
three shot series)
On 14 Jul 2004 at 10:40, Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
We seem to
pride ourselves on showing just how educated we are on such
matters on this
list, and then go and negate it all by acting like a bunch of
vulgar
neanderthals!
So prey tell, what
Ry, I see you tried to IM me before, I am assuming that it was for this
question?
I agree with Rob here, you've lost me too, for the same reasons as he
mentioned...
There are two different drives in thd MUVO - if you were lucky enough to get
the early model, you will be fine to use it, if you
: Temptation of Eve, the three
shot series)
--- Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 14
Jul 2004 at 12:35, Tanya Mayer Photography
wrote:
And that has got to be the most inconcise, and
long-winded sentence anyone
has ever written on the PDML, jeez, I am so full
of BS...
That was OK
: Wednesday, 14 July 2004 1:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PAW: Self Portrait...
Isn't that like being not exactly pregnant?
frank theriault wrote:
--- Tanya Mayer Photography [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Erm, I'm not exactly available, I'd appreciate it
if you stopped winking
at me, OK
Ok, so I have been completely bombarded with off-list emails. I thank you
all so much for your amazing words of support and love. I really don't want
to air any more of my private life on list as it is about as far off topic
as it could possibly be, and besides, it is a private matter, and
Ha! That Godwin's Law is hilarious! Very cool, Bob!
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Don Sanderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 15 July 2004 7:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: apologetic
Thanks Bob,
That's the best laugh I've had all day!
Don
-Original
w, that is just adorable!
BTW, I believe that you're neice's baby would be your great nephew/niece.
Your daughter is so beautiful Bruce, look at that hair!
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Dayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 15 July 2004 1:08 PM
To: [EMAIL
A certain old, pommie bald guy wrote:
She's not *that* young, so I guess that just makes her a thing.
Cheers,
Cotty oh boy am I gonna pay for that
Oh, boy, will you ever! You wait 'til I see you on MSN Messenger next
time - I have *just* the smiley for you!
BUT, I'll be gentle with you,
OMG - you are so bad! lol.
t.
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 17 July 2004 3:21 AM
To: pentax list
Subject: Re: Waiting to go on.
On 17/7/04, Tanya Mayer Photography, discombobulated, offered:
A certain old, pommie bald guy wrote:
She's
DagT -
these are a very cool series of pics. I love the colour, composition and
movement that each possesses.
Now, I have something else to say
I just viewed the rest of the images that you have on photo.net and I am
extremely impressed by your work! Some of the shots I have seen before,
Actually, ERN, that's not exactly true, the fill flash function, and the
recipes, and quite a number of other features (mainly shortcut type
stuff, and fun things like borders etc) are not available in CS or any other
version except for Elements, to my knowledge.
Feel free, anyone to correct me
Shaun, if anyone *has* come up with such a solution - I WANT IT! Try using
the *istD with the Hitachi microdrive, no battery grip, and see just how
long the batteries last! I go through 7 sets per wedding, and usually end
up chucking in a set of Duracell's just to see me through the tail
: *ist D and Power sources
On Sun, 18 Jul 2004, Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
Shaun, if anyone *has* come up with such a solution - I WANT IT! Try
using
the *istD with the Hitachi microdrive, no battery grip, and see just how
long the batteries last!
I use this setup and have no problem
Rob, how does that thing work?!?! And yeah, how much would it set me
back?!?!
:-)
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Rob Studdert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, 18 July 2004 3:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: *ist D and Power sources
On 18 Jul 2004 at 12:42, Dr. Shaun
OMG, Rob, did you just say something *positive* about the *istD?!!? Or was I
just hallucinating? Maybe I've been eating too many choc chip cookies...
(I've been on a bit of a baking binge the last few days...)
*GASP* Could it be, that Mr Studdert is starting to *like* his *istD?!?
;-)
tan.
I have to say that I agree with Antonio and Jens on this one, as I often
shoot wide open (f1.7, 2.5 or 2.8, depending on the lens), specifically to
decrease the depth of field. Unfortunately, the extra depth of field for
me, sucks majorly.
However, I don't feel that you need to be rude to prove
You know what? This is all way over my head! I am so not smart enough to
understand any of this - so, as I said in my initial post - I'm just going
to keep on using my DOF preview and the LCD to compose to get the DOF that I
need/want.
Sheesh, my mind is so boggled right now. I need
omigosh! that is so freakin' funny! I have dibs on Strumpet, she is so
ME!!
hehe.
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Caveman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 21 July 2004 10:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Digital vs Film
http://www.winternet.com/~mikelr/flame1.html
there's one in every crowd...
you are totally asking for it buddy...
(anyone know of a good hitman in london?)
;-P
t.
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 21 July 2004 10:50 PM
To: pentax list
Subject: Re: Digital vs Film
On 21/7/04, Tanya Mayer
or Aussie! And don't forget how to spell COLOUR either, ok?!? hehe.
t.
-Original Message-
From: graywolf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 22 July 2004 1:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PDML Mini FAQ (was Re-- Comment and Question (WAS: RE--
Apology for)
OMG, THAT is hilarious! And very clever really!
Wonder if they need a wedding photographer...
t.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 22 July 2004 3:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PDML Mini-FAQ
--Original
Thanks graywolf!
:-)
t.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel J. Matyola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 22 July 2004 7:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PDML FAQ is up
Nice job!
graywolf wrote:
http://graywolfphoto.com/pentax/pdml-faq.html
Hey Frankie, baby... (hehe)
*I* for one, DID notice your absence!
Sending lots of gimme a great job vibes your way!
Why don't you go and approach some law firms?! ;-)
t.
-Original Message-
From: frank theriault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 22 July 2004 6:03 AM
To: [EMAIL
... hehe
t.
-Original Message-
From: frank theriault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 22 July 2004 7:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: PDML Mini-FAQ
--- Tanya Mayer Photography [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Wonder if they need a wedding photographer...
...and that, my
yeah, i agree Mike, we do need to be committed - padded cell anyone?
oh wait, you said committEE, oops, sorry, my bad... must be that whole
language difference thing again...
hehe
t.
-Original Message-
From: mike wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 22 July 2004 7:53 AM
Speaking of quotes Don, (btw, nice to meet ya, I don't believe we've been
introduced as yet! lol), I think it was Mark(?), who does up an annual PDML
Quotes of the year thingy. Better watch what you say or you could end up
in the hall of fame with some very, erm, questionable company...
;-)
hmmm, i always thought that In re: meant in regards to...
which i guess equates to the same meaning as in reference to...
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Stan Halpin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 22 July 2004 3:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re (Was Re: Comment
Kismet! I love that word! I have this list of words that I just love. You
know words that just sound so cool when you say them? Some of my favourites
are: epiphany, azure, charisma, procrastinate, salubrious, titillate,
sensuality, epitome, elusive, insipid, whimsical, effervescent,
ha! it was -6 celsius here last night!
jeez, i hate the cold, bring me December, and a sarong, quickly, puh-lease!
Shaun, I wanna see some pics!
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 23 July 2004 1:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: First
me too, i'm jealous...
:-(
tan. (who is going to organise one hell of a dcpdml hoedown when i get
there!)
-Original Message-
From: Cesar Matamoros II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 23 July 2004 1:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Bill Owens'; 'Christian Skofteland
(E-mail)'; 'Dan
like never before invented
words
hehe.
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 23 July 2004 6:16 AM
To: pentax list
Subject: Re: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re: Digital
vs Film)
On 23/7/04, Tanya Mayer Photography, discombobulated
ok, so educate me, what is Balderdash?
(although, I think I *kind of* get the gist of it going by Frank's post...
tan.
-Original Message-
From: frank theriault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 23 July 2004 7:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: OT: Tans prattling again (RE:
Yup, I have been to a few concerts of late where they were doing body
searches for camera phones. At Madonna they were particularly tough, and
there was lots of little teenage girls crying cause they wouldn't be able to
phone their mummies to come and pick them up after the concert!
tan.
hehe, don't we all?!?!
However, the fact remains, that the financial benefits received by myself,
are completely incongruous to the amount of photographic fortitude that I
expel, and therefore, I am forced to accept that my talents are nothing more
than soporific. I do, however, possess this
dunno Alan, I wondered the exact same thing - they were putting them in
these big boxes, and there was literally hundreds, maybe even thousands of
them
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Alan Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 23 July 2004 7:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
not component to use.
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Tanya Mayer Photography [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 11:52 PM
Subject: RE: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not particularly Re:
Digital vs Film)
hehe, don't we all?!?!
However, the fact remains
to
clone out the bird poo that was all over it! hehe.
Oh, and yes, before anyone asks, I most certainly *do* have a pink and
purple fence - I mean what other colour fence do you think *I* would have?!?
;-)
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Tanya Mayer Photography [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
Bob W wrote:
Had you truly duffified the lexicon, mayhaps reading boustrophedonically
for incremental velocity, and left it dwizzen as any dudman, you would
have disinterred more than a yeepsen of prolixity. Nevertheless, as we
yaffle our mundivagant liplabour like grimgribbers (sorry, Frank - I
Fred, fred, fred...
Finally somebody understands the series of events that us wedding
photographers are so adept at handling.
I feel for you, in such a heartfelt way, my poor little friend, to have gone
so blindly into territory that is so treacherous, so hostile, that I often
refer to it as
was perfect for it.
Brought all kinds of thoughts to mind.
It's my favorite because it keeps making me go back and look again.
Some very nice work tan.
Don
-Original Message-
From: Tanya Mayer Photography [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 6:53 PM
To: [EMAIL
Eeeek, its All Caps!!
Jeez that annoys the you know what out of me! I wouldn't bid on that
auction, just because of that reason.
Yeah, I know, I am a fickle creature, aren't I?
:-)
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Gonz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 23 July 2004 11:38 AM
To:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: My first wedding shoot.
--- Tanya Mayer Photography [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Fred, fred, fred...
Finally somebody understands the series of events
that us wedding
photographers are so adept at handling.
I feel for you, in such a heartfelt way, my poor
little
: Friday, 23 July 2004 3:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Tan's foray into stock photography
--- Tanya Mayer Photography [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Frank, blowing wind up Tan's arse said:snip
This is an obviously Aussie expression that I'm not
sure I'm so comfortable with. vbg
Ok, well, thanks for asking!
Here's what I did - *istD exposure settings at ISO400, 1/30th, f3.5,
contrast - high, saturation - high, sharpness - high.
I used the AF-500ftz, set manually, at 1/16th, and with Lumiquest Promax
Softbox attached.
Lens was Tokina atx Pro II 28-70/2.8 with a Tamron
Eek! Is that a self portrait?!?
Jeez, just how SHARP is that bloody lens?!!? I SO have to get me one!
As always, I love your perspective on things, that is a very cool shot.
tan.
-Original Message-
From: DagT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 23 July 2004 4:44 PM
To: [EMAIL
Oh, Kenneth, I forgot to say on that post, that I was shooting RAW. As
such, I'm not sure just how much those settings actually affect the results.
However, normally, when shooting a wedding for eg, I have the
contrast/saturation level set on low, and the sharpness set on medium.
Again, I'm not
I'm sending you all of the good vibes that I can Frank. Fingers and toes
crossed for you!
BTW -
OMG, you are all such BOYS!!
Wenches, strap (or was it SNAP) ons
Get your minds out of the gutter and just wish Frank good luck will you?!?
;-)
tan. *the innocent*
-Original
ha! so do i!
t
-Original Message-
From: tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 29 July 2004 3:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: OT: BBC Street photograph of the year
I have a foot photo and I'm not afraid to use it, so be careful...
tv
-Original Message-
That's great Kenneth! Congratulations!
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Kenneth Waller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 4 August 2004 10:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PUG image published
Just got word that my August PUG submission was awarded First place in the
scenic
or a harsh sharp glamourous one ?
Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
Anyways, I'd love to see some of you work your magic on it and see what
you
can come up with!
Jeez, no wonder you all have the hots for her, she's gorgeous!
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Ohrbit [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 5 August 2004 10:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: HOPP:Minolta Girl - she nearly broke a Pentax users heart
Starting to scan some very old
I totally agree!
I can remember the meanings of precisely FOUR of them - OT, PESO, PAW, WOW.
And I think that is only because they all, kind of spell something. Apart
from that, my feeble little mind has no comprehension!
Love it Fred, very well put!
tan.
-Original Message-
From:
LOL! Well, my daughter is now 15 months and LOVES her booby (breast
feeds) - my middle boy I fed until he was 18 months old, and he still looks
at my daughter with envy when she gets a feed...
tan.
A recent survey in Norway revealed parents of babies and toddlers to
be the most
content and
Great story Shel! I have taught myself all of my photography (except for
what you guys have learned me!), and I often wish that someone could show
me, on a practical level, a number of points that I still get confused with.
Ray sounds like a great guy, hopefully, one day, I'll have a similar
I have really enjoyed reading this thread - it is lovely to hear what
everybody gave and received for Christmas...
I received exactly four gifts for Christmas. One from my hubby and one from
each of my kids. I went shopping in a town an hour from here (it is called
Emerald) the week before
OT - but just wanted to post a little page that I put up for family and
friends (so you guys qualify there!), of Christmas, Fairygirl style... I
thought that you guys in the Northern Hemisphere in particular, would be
most interested to see the contrasts in the way we celebrate our Christmas
here
that there will be no shots because you forgot to put
the film in it lol.
Keep up the good work.
Peter
- Original Message -
From: Tanya Mayer Photography [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 10:27 PM
Subject: GFM and a CRAPPY weekend...
Hi all,
well, yep, i
LOL! He's truly not *that* hard done by! Actually, Cotty, he drinks
bourbon (usually Jim Beam Black), but doesn't even get to buy that anymore
cause now he brews his own! lol...
tan.
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday,
Wow Ann! A big congratulations, that is fantastic! How very exciting for
you...
tan.
- Original Message -
From: Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 11:33 AM
Subject: Re: a small feather in my cap - yes, I used a Pentax
frank
this is the best of all possible worlds. The
pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Tanya Mayer Photography [EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip
So, anyways, the books that I received are by Anne Geddes. I am sure
that
you all know who she is, and for those who don't, just google
hehehe, or over a cliff face, OR in front of a moving car...
tan.
- Original Message -
From: tom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 2:03 PM
Subject: RE: Just one tip
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Waterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
got a link to this guy? i just googled the name, and only got like
Amazon.com etc for places to buy books about that breed of dog...
tan.
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2003 9:07 AM
Subject: RE: Santa
Subject: RE: Just one tip
-Original Message-
From: Tanya Mayer Photography [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
More than once, I have had a kid run past me at a rodeo and
trip on my
tripod, knocking it to the ground, (*tanya wonders if she
should invest in a
monopod for such events
That sounds so cool tom! Make sure you get some pics of said birdcage...
I will definitely be clubbing with #7 if I ever do get up your way, I'm not
too old, hehe...
Every year since we were together, with the exception of 2000, (I was
pregnant for our very first New Year's Eve together!), Rusty
Bob said: search for William Wegman
Thanks Bob!
OH, MY GAWD
that guy is the DEFINITION of commercialism, he even has dog t-shirts!
(there is one with the dog in a lolita pose, supposedly sexy - SCARY
STUFF!) - *eek* - not my thing AT ALL, but hey, I'll bet he's laughing all
the way to the
that often only two or three shots from a roll are
chosen
for publication or exhibition or some other useful purpose.
18 keepers per roll is darned good, imo.
Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
I guess this is why I still don't believe that I have a great strike
rate
with my photography. I am
I have to ask, maybe naively, BUT, what is the big deal about the aperture
ring? Exactly what does it add to in regards to camera function, or more
to the point, what does it take away when it isn't availalble? Is it only
really a problem for those trying to use newer lenses with older bodies?
lol! that's funny Bill! I am the same with our annual Melbourne Cup horse
race. They say it is the race that stops a nation. And everyone who is
anyone bets on it - except me! I think it is just crazy to bet on such a
race, with almost no chance of winning when almost all of the horses are as
Ok, so after reading some of your responses and after chatting with Rob
Studdert today, I now get this. The one MAJOR point to me, is one that
Rob pointed out. The MZ-S doesn't have aperture priority from the body. I
had NO IDEA of this, and to me, this alone is a huge mistake that Pentax is
Ok, cool, everything that you guys have offered in regards to this makes
perfect sense to me. My main confusion was that it appeared to me to be
claiming that it was indeed 38/39 separate exposures on the one frame,
shot over the course of the year and totally unmanipulated from the neg. I
think
401 - 500 of 731 matches
Mail list logo
