Looks interesting. A lot of functions though. Would it make sense to at
least remove all date_sub_* () functions in favor of using the
date_add_* () counterparts with negative values? E.g. date_add_days(-10)
does the same as date_sub_days(10) ? One of the easy ways to reduce
usability of an ext
Strange build problem. Build php 4.3.0 with pgsql support on linux
(mostly redhat 7.2) and got this:
Installing shared extensions:
/usr/local/lib/php/extensions/debug-non-zts-20020429/
Installing PEAR environment: /usr/local/lib/php/
/usr/src/web/php-4.3.0/sapi/cli/php: error while load
it's just that your mailer is smart enough to decode uu-encoded
attachments. Not everybody's is.
Vlad
Mike Hall wrote:
I received the attachment... you sure it's his mailer playing up? ;-)
Mike
--- Original Message ---
From:Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PR
nt Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
>> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>
> Met vriendelijke groeten / With kind regards,
>
> Webmaster IDG.nl
> Melvyn Sopacua
>
> <@Logan> I spent a minute looking at my own code by accident.
> <@Logan> I was thinking "What the hell is this guy doing?"
>
>
--
Vlad Krupin
Software Engineer
echospace.com
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
otice the difference in output. Is this the expected result?
Vlad
--
Vlad Krupin
Software Engineer
echospace.com
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
this be overruled somehow in the extension
>to trick pspell to think it's just I've instead of I\'ve?
>
>
>On Mon, 03 Jun 2002 12:24:16 -0700
>Vlad Krupin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>I believe you would have to complain to Kevin Atkinson about that
>&
pellcheck $var.
>My problem is that if $var contain ' it will
>report that it's wronly spelled like this:
>
>Possible spelling for I\'ve : I've Ive...
>
>
>Regards
>Magnus Määttä
>
>
--
--
Vlad Krupin
Software Engineer
echospace.com
--
P
#x27;ve spent lots of hours coding things I
> feel are very important, but that does not equal being important to a
> core distribution of a given project.
>
> Shane
>
>
--
--
Vlad Krupin
Software Engineer
echospace.com
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
dbase_add_record() completed, before it's committed, I should get the read
>support completed? At this point, it could be committed.
>
>Thanks,
>Geoff
>- Original Message -
>From: "Vlad Krupin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Geoff" <[EMAIL
please let me know.
>
>In the meantime, if you are interested in the dbase module, you can get it
>from http://www.jukeware.com/projects.php?id=1
>After a bit more testing, I'll have the 4.2.1 migrated code there.
>
>Thanks,
>Geoff Jukema
>
>
>
>
>
--
--
Vlad Krupin
Software Engineer
echospace.com
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
I looked over the patch very briefly. I have a couple of
comments/changes, but I'll take time to look more at it tomorrow.
The problem is that now we have yet another aspell, and on aspell
website it says that it's the latest and the greatest, and our website
(www.php.net/pspell and www.php.ne
After playing with the same problem for a while a few months back, I
believe I pin-pointed the problem. When you download a file, IE places
it into a temp folder before opening. If you tell it explicitly not to
cache, it won't put it there, and, when it tries to open it, it'll
crash. Different
size. (And it's fine with me to merge it)
>
>regards,
>Derick
>
>>Joseph
>>
>>>-Original Message-
>>>From: Vlad Krupin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>>Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 4:15 PM
>>>To: PHP Developers Mailing List
>>>C
Hi, this is the second try to get feedback and to make a fix to
ftp_size() function.
After bringing that issue up a few days back, I got response from Derick
only with some concerns, which I'll address here.
Please, respond or I'll just apply the patch because it makes sense to
me and see what
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, Vlad Krupin wrote:
>
>>I guess, we could do that too. Should I come up with a new patch?
>>
>
>I think it is better, decrease the WTF factor :)
>
I think so too. However, two things:
1. after reading the source for a f
, FTPTYPE_IMAGE))
+ return -1;
if (!ftp_putcmd(ftp, "SIZE", path))
return -1;
if (!ftp_getresp(ftp) || ftp->resp != 213)
Vlad
--
Vlad Krupin
Software Engineer
echospace.com
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.ne
...wonder if it's better than sleepless nights hunting down php bugs...
with the latter you could at least reboot...
Vlad
Derick Rethans wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Congrats! and have fun with sleepless nights and changing diapers :)
>
>Derick
>
>On Wed, 6 Mar 2002, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
>
>>@@ -1,2 +1,6 @@
Sorry, I'm just catching up with email backlog, so this email might be
irrelevant by now, but just in case it isn't:
imap_fetch_header() is probably not a very good name because we already have
imap_fetchheader() and I believe they might be a bit too similar in names (I don't
know what the pro
Sorry, couldn't reply earlier - I was away on my honeymoon ;)
Yes, the change is cool - I guess, I was too happy with the 'Cut'
shortcut when Copy&Pasting code from aspell a couple of years ago :)
Thanks for noticing
Vlad
Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> ID:
How about having a check:
If a bug your are trying to make bogus has already been bogusified,
trying to bogusify it again with a standard response (from the "quick
fix" drop-down box) fails. You can still add comments if you actually
type them in, just prevent more than one standard response pe
ted lately. I'm not trying to be
hostile, I am just bringing to your attention the fact that you are
frustrating a heck of a lot of people, and might not even be realizing
it. So, I figured I'd save you some trouble and suggest that you move on
from php to a language that better suits your needs and developers that
are more friendly towards you. Take care...
--
Vlad Krupin
Software Engineer
echospace.com
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
consensus... well, it wasn't reached. I guess, the overloaded solution -
exit(string, int) - is the last thing that was proposed and not too many
people objected to. My understanding is that that's what will happen. Or
am I wrong again?
-being short this time-
Vlad
Markus Fischer wrote:
>
Zeev Suraski wrote:
[snip]
> What I *really* fail to understand is the gain we get by modifying
> exit()'s behavior, as opposed to adding a new function or adding a new
> $silent argument. Giving a WFF to several people? Consistency with
> other languages that have nothing to do with the Web
says that there are scripts out there that rely on the current implementation
of exit(), e.g. one of his own. Jamming two values into a storage space designed for a
single value (a string) is bad :(
Vlad
Lars Torben Wilson wrote:
>Vlad Krupin writes:
>
>>Lars Torben Wilson wrote:
Derick Rethans wrote:
[snip]
>Ok, that was the problem, now the solution:
>
>1. We fix exit
>2. We add an extra argument to exit, which silences the output
>3. We make exit understand @, like @exit();
>
all other issues aside, though an '@' sounds cool (after all, exit()
*looks* like a function)
Lars Torben Wilson wrote:
>Zeev Suraski writes:
>
>>At 15:15 19/12/2001, Lars Torben Wilson wrote:
>>
>>>Zeev Suraski writes:
>>>
exit_with_status(), silent_exit(), quiet_exit(), etc. etc. Something
should fit :)
>>>Yeah, you could do that. But then, why don't we have a
>>>'c_compat
it's kinda lame to create a yet another function when exit() already
exists. After a while you have die(), exit(), exit_with_status(),
silent_exit(), loud_exit(), etc. Maybe not *that* bad, but still exit is
just as simple as... well, an exit. Unfortunately, it seems like there
will be tons of
Uh?
You probably do not want to see the returned code printed anyway (unless
you are debugging and are lazy to get it in any other way). Chances are
that the codes returned by exit() won't make much sense to anyone but
the one who develops the code, and it's not too difficult to do:
echo 1;
exi
Hey, c'mon, the guy decided to have some fun - he listed verbatim most
of the items that are listed as NOT requiring a CVS account. Do you
seriously think he expected a favorable answer?
Zak Greant wrote:
>On November 29, 2001 10:38 am, aidan peiser wrote:
>
>>Learning PHP
>>Coding in PHP
>>Re
001, Vlad Krupin wrote:
>
>>As expected, same crash, essentially the same backtrace. This time I
>>also excluded MySQL from build.
>>./configure --with-apxs=/usr/local/apache/bin/apxs --without-mysql
>>--enable-debug
>>Fresh today's checkout, apache 1.2.12. So,
;_init>, fini=0x812294c <_fini>,
rtld_fini=0x4000ae60 <_dl_fini>, stack_end=0xbacc)
at ../sysdeps/generic/libc-start.c:92
Vlad Krupin wrote:
> I am pretty sure dbase has nothing to do with it. No dbase code gets
> called before we crash. I do not think it wou
Fischer wrote:
>On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 02:40:55PM -0800, Vlad Krupin wrote :
>
>>I finally got around to fixing the dbase bug I have assigned, and...
>>when I tried to compile today's snapshot with a very simple confug line:
>>./configure --with-apxs=/usr/local/a
000ae60 <_dl_fini>, stack_end=0xbacc)
at ../sysdeps/generic/libc-start.c:92
--
Vlad Krupin
Software Engineer
echospace.com
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact th
Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
> Markus Fischer wrote:
>
>> Although my vote doesn't count much here :-) I'm for it...
>>
>> ... but it would be a problem for 4.x I guess because this
>> horribly breaks BC when/if there's a new 4.x release and
>> people start using it.
>
>
> should be
FWIW:
Signed shift seems to make little sense to me personally, since we are
just dealing with a row of bits, and if you really want to do a quick
multiplication/division, you might just as well use a * or / operator -
it is not going to hurt that much:). *However*, it's been possible in
diffe
Arghh!
aspell 0.27 + php4 = *BAD* IDEA. Did you read the note on the page from
php manual you mentioned in your email?
I quote:
*Note: * aspell works only with very old (up to .27.* or so)
versions of aspell library. Neither this module, nor those versions
of aspell library are suppo
MacOS? Hmmm... I bet the problem is in that the end-lines are not
recognized correctly. That is, the newline on a MAC ('\r') on the line
that has a comment on it is not recognized as a valid newline, thus the
closing tag "?>" will appear on the same line after the comment, as far
as PHP is concern
Andi, can you tell me what would happen if I also have another c.php in
the same directory as a.php? which one of the two c.php's will get included?
I am not complaining about the solution, I am just rying to see if it
will break my code...
thanks,
Vlad
Andi Gutmans wrote:
>Hi guys,
>
>Att
4.1 thing.
>
>Brian Moon
>--
>dealnews.com, Inc.
>Makers of dealnews & dealmac
>http://dealnews.com/ | http://dealmac.com/
>
>
>----- Original Message -
>From: "Andi Gutmans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To:
Is it better to break things once or twice? Ok, not completely break,
but now I have some code working with PHP4, later I will have some code
that will work with PHP4.1, and finally I will re-write it to work with
the latest-and-best PHP5. It is more like saying "Here is my script, you
can run
I would *love* to see that!
Vlad
Andi Gutmans wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I think one thing that bothers PHP developers is when they do:
> include "../foo.inc";
> and in foo.inc they do:
> include "bar.inc";
>
> That bar.inc is not searched for in foo.inc's current directory
> automatically. As we prett
Glad it worked for you (finally)
Lindsey Simon wrote:
>
>So now I'm working on some scripts and functions for a spellchecker. The API is
>perfect
>for it, and I wonder why I don't see any finished versions out there.. Are you working
>on one Vlad? I was really shocked by the lack of quality f
Please, tell me what
1. your configure line is for php
2. configure lines for aspell and pspell
3. location of your dictionaries
Another thing. You said:
>I've created a file en-american.pwli in the
>pkgdata directory which points absolutely
>to a wordlist american-words.95.
What's pkgdata? I h
quite likely you missed something simple. Can you do the following?
1. go into pspell/example directory
2. do 'make example-c
3. do 'su nobody'
4. run './example-c en' (or whichever language you use)
5. try to spellcheck a word, e.g. 's helllo'
And see what happens. If this does not succeed, you p
Next thing you know is that we have --disable-(your favorite function
here) for half the functions in php. That's a bad precedent, IMHO.
Vlad
Brian Moon wrote:
> No, sorry, I think you misunderstood my question. I would just like to see
> a --disable-ereg option for configure. I would never d
UID's will be unique for IMAP, not POP servers. At least, as far as I
remember, c-client will return a numer (a long, if I am not mistaken);
that is the UID you get. 3afffb530001 is not gonna fit in there. I
do not think you can get much more. If there is a capability in POP3
part of c-cli
> I don't think that was the reason... because
>
> echo 'hello world'; // please no...
> echo '';
> ?>
>
> will print me:
>
> // please no...
> echo '';
>
>
> any further ideas?
> Maxim Maletsky
>
>
>
>
That's most likely because you have newlines that PHP does not
understand (it should in 4.0.6). In particular, the newline just before
the // comment that got printed out where it should not is probably
mac-style '\r' instead of unix-style '\n' or dos-style '\r\n'. Fix those
newlines and every
Isn't that how it already works? bug list doesn't seem too much of a
burden for me:) I just fix a bug at a time at my own leisurly pace.
Although it would be nice to know what's more critical to fix and what's
not. Otherwise I pick my own random bugs...
Vlad
Billy Rose wrote:
> It is obviou
49 matches
Mail list logo
