fine on one machine, but not the other,
given that apache and php configs are the same.
flu:~# apache2 -v
Server version: Apache/2.2.16 (Debian)
Server built: Mar 22 2011 20:56:31
flu:~# php -v
PHP 5.3.3-7+squeeze1 with Suhosin-Patch (cli) (built: Mar 18 2011 17:22:52)
Copyright (c) 1997-2009
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 22:55, Jimmy Stewpot mail...@oranged.to wrote:
Is there a method or way that I can enable a 'debug' mode in php which would
help me track down and identify the root cause of these problems?
If anyone has any suggestions on what I can do to try and get further down
the
On Fri, 7 Jan 2011 16:24:13 -0500
Daniel Brown danbr...@php.net wrote:
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 22:55, Jimmy Stewpot mail...@oranged.to
wrote:
Is there a method or way that I can enable a 'debug' mode in php
which would help me track down and identify the root cause of these
problems? If
Hello,
I have been working over the last few months to try and get to the bottom of
why our apache processes are regularly being killed with a Sig 11 (Segmentation
Fault). Here are the messages in the kern.log
httpd[22309]: segfault at 7fffd01b4ffc rip 2b1f935c064c rsp
Jonathan Tapicer wrote:
What version, VC6 or VC9, TS or NTS? I use VC6 TS and the dll is there...
Of cause no one has asked yet which version you use if you have to test
BOTH Apache and IIS ;)
--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-
Contact -
Hi,
I just downloaded the new stable version of PHP 5.3 and I couldnt find the
php5apache2_2.dll file.
Is the apache module on windows no longer supported?
Thanks!
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
What version, VC6 or VC9, TS or NTS? I use VC6 TS and the dll is there...
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Pablo Viquezpviq...@pabloviquez.com wrote:
Hi,
I just downloaded the new stable version of PHP 5.3 and I couldnt find the
php5apache2_2.dll file.
Is the apache module on windows no
Yes, you need to use the V6 installer, I did the same thing with the V9 and
it won't work. Only after uninstalling PHP did I see that line of text
saying which one to use...
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Jonathan Tapicer tapi...@gmail.com wrote:
What version, VC6 or VC9, TS or NTS? I use VC6
:50 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP] Apache module PHP 5.3 on Windows
Yes, you need to use the V6 installer, I did the same thing with the V9
and
it won't work. Only after uninstalling PHP did I see that line of text
saying which one to use...
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Jonathan Tapicer tapi
I am having a hard time trying to get some pages work. I have PHP 5.2.8,
Apache 2.2 and MySQL 5.1 running in a Windows Vista home edition. All
packages were installed, and configured, the strange thing is that pages
commonly work but when I add a new line (e.g. an echo line) with a dummy
text
such as a syntax error or an unhandled exception occurs. A configured
ErrorDocument 500 handler will be triggered, as I would expect it to be.
It seems that PHP does not signal an error 500 to Apache when PHP
code fails. Wouldn't this be a useful addition for exactly this
reason (ability to use
Hello,
When I am trying to load PHP as a module (php4apache.dll), it gives me
error at the time of starting Apache Server. Error is like -
[Thu Jan 31 13:11:11 2002] [warn]
Loaded DSO D:/php/sapi/php4apache.dll uses plain Apache 1.3 API, this
module might crash under EAPI! (please
Здравствуйте, php-general.
Hi all.
I have some problem with my Apache server.
When some user try open php script using mobile fone some chat
program I get this errors on my log file:
[Mon Aug 29 18:37:39 2005] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] chunked Transfer-Encoding
forbidden: /chat/index.php
[Mon
Hi,
I have Apache 2.0.52 with PHP 4.3.9, running on a Linux Fedora 3, and cannot
write through PHP on any folder, except for /tmp.
No matter which permissions, owner or group are set for the folders or files,
they never become writable.
When I execute the following script, I have always obtain
to make this work? Is it even possible?
Rasmus:
A few months back you posted some Apache settings that allow one to
run both php5 and php on the same Apache instance using mod_proxy
(iirc). Can you please post that again? I can't seem to google for it
in the archives.
Thanks,
Burhan
is
returned... Is this a bug in PHP, Apache, not a bug but an unimplemented
feature, security precaution, or what? Am I missing something simple to
get the POSTed data?
No, you can't do what you are trying to do the way you are trying to do
it. Apache changes the original POST to a GET request
Raymond C. Rodgers wrote:
On Sat, 2005-07-09 at 02:04 -0700, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
No, you can't do what you are trying to do the way you are trying to do
it. Apache changes the original POST to a GET request on the internal
errordocument redirect so PHP can't get at the original posted data.
. However, it seems that POSTed data just vanishes
into thin air. $_POST is not set, of course, and I've been trying to
read data using file_get_contents('php://input') but nothing is
returned... Is this a bug in PHP, Apache, not a bug but an unimplemented
feature, security precaution, or what? Am I
and turn into
$_REQUEST and/or $_GET. However, it seems that POSTed data just vanishes
into thin air. $_POST is not set, of course, and I've been trying to
read data using file_get_contents('php://input') but nothing is
returned... Is this a bug in PHP, Apache, not a bug but an unimplemented
From: Solotony [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Apache 2.0 + mod_fastcgi + PHP
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.apache.user
Summary:
Keywords:
I have Apache 2.0.52 with mod_fastcgi 2.4.2 and PHP 4.3.11 installed on Gentoo
box.
When starting apache (php as fast-cgi) it runs w/o any problems, but after
some
Hi there!
I've just installed Apache on a new computer. (just for testing)
It's Windows XP. I've then installed PHP and it says that Apache could be
not configured automatically.
Newbies question as hell probably but here it goes:
I can access my Apache-server, I have the document-root to
the http-server with php-files.
I don't cant getting any full support answers on this, just give me
hints... :-)
/G
@varupiraten.se
Check out:
http://www.php.net/manual/en/install.windows.apache2.php
Pay particular attention to the AddType directives. This will make
Apache process PHP files.
Hope
For Apache2.x: http://www.php.net/manual/en/install.windows.apache2.php
For Apache1.x: http://www.php.net/manual/en/install.windows.apache1.php
Mike
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hi there!
Thanx! :-)
I hope I can solve this myself now... :-)
/G
@varupiraten.se
- Original Message -
From: dan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 11:23 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP] Apache and PHP
Gustav Wiberg wrote:
Hi there!
I've just installed
Gustav Wiberg wrote:
Hi there!
Thanx! :-)
I hope I can solve this myself now... :-)
If you get stuck another good line of approach might be
to install a preconfigured bundle (php/apache/mysql) and
then possibly compare you configs with theres e.g:
http://www.devside.net/
http
[snip]
Hope everybody else is sending this guy read receipts?
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
I definetly amIRRITATING!
- Original Message -
From: Mikey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 6:10 AM
Subject: RE: [PHP] Apache 2.0.52, PHP 5.03, FreeBSD 4.10 memory problems
[snip]
Hope everybody else is sending this guy read receipts
Wil Hitchman wrote:
I definetly amIRRITATING!
- Original Message - From: Mikey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 6:10 AM
Subject: RE: [PHP] Apache 2.0.52, PHP 5.03, FreeBSD 4.10 memory problems
[snip]
Hope everybody else is sending
:-( The downside would be, IMHO, that I would need to pro-actively check
everything that is going on concerning PHP, in order to prevent any major
problems. (one and a halve month ago, some clients on an other
installation
who hadn't mainted phpBB also caused me the necessary problems). Also,
(like PHP) to crash the
server!
You should try check out the freebsd mailling lists. I'm pretty sure
they can help you out! :) Please also make sure you run the latest
versions
of apache and php.
Good luck finding the error!
Simon
Btw I run FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE, Apache 2.0.52_4 and PHP
:-( The downside would be, IMHO, that I would need to pro-actively
check everything that is going on concerning PHP, in order
to prevent
any major problems. (one and a halve month ago, some clients on an
other installation who hadn't mainted phpBB also caused me the
necessary
Sander Holthaus - Orange XL wrote:
Sander Holthaus - Orange XL wrote:
...
Fix or disable that script.
I wish I could, but I'm not a PHP-programmer (can read it
and can do
some basic programming, but I lack in-depth knowledge of PHP).
well disabling it is fairly easy
I'm running Apache 2.0.52 and PHP 5.03 in a jailed (Virtual Private Server)
FreeBSD 4.10 envirorement. PHP 5.03 is running as php_mod and was installed
quite recently. Since then (better, since someone started using it) I've
been getting these errors in the httpd-error log:
Allowed memory size
Sander Holthaus - Orange XL wrote:
I'm running Apache 2.0.52 and PHP 5.03 in a jailed (Virtual Private
Server)
FreeBSD 4.10 envirorement. PHP 5.03 is running as php_mod and was
installed
quite recently. Since then (better, since someone started using it) I've
been getting these errors
) to crash the
server!
You should try check out the freebsd mailling lists. I'm pretty sure
they can help you out! :) Please also make sure you run the latest versions
of apache and php.
Good luck finding the error!
Simon
Btw I run FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE, Apache 2.0.52_4 and PHP 5.0.3_2
when i try to run
Sander Holthaus - Orange XL wrote:
I'm running Apache 2.0.52 and PHP 5.03 in a jailed (Virtual Private
Server)
FreeBSD 4.10 envirorement. PHP 5.03 is running as php_mod and was
installed quite recently. Since then (better, since someone started
using it) I've been getting these errors
Please turn off your request for read reciepts when posting to a mailing
list.
--
John C. Nichel
ÜberGeek
KegWorks.com
716.856.9675
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
John Nichel wrote:
Please turn off your request for read reciepts when posting to a mailing
list.
ohhh :-( I was enjoying that ;-)
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Sander Holthaus - Orange XL wrote:
Sander Holthaus - Orange XL wrote:
...
Fix or disable that script.
I wish I could, but I'm not a PHP-programmer (can read it and can do some
basic programming, but I lack in-depth knowledge of PHP).
well disabling it is fairly easy ;-) rm -f ./xxx.php
I
Hi.
I am trying to get Apache 2.0.52 / PHP 4.3.10 working with some scripts I
am using.
I have a file named /www/projects which is a php script.
When I type the url: www.site/projects/variable
I want variable passed to the script projects
I have the the http.conf set up as:
Files projects
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 11:39:51 -0800, Robin Getz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi.
I am trying to get Apache 2.0.52 / PHP 4.3.10 working with some scripts I
am using.
Which used to work with apache 2.0.40 and php 4.2.3 - but what happens now,
is I actually get passed the php script back
Andrew Kreps wrote:
I had to add this line to my httpd.conf:
AddType application/x-httpd-php .php
I have this and the DirectoryIndex - the problem is that my script does not
end in a .php extention. (GForge )
If I rename the file projects.php and point to that, it works, but that
means an
Robin Getz wrote:
Andrew Kreps wrote:
I had to add this line to my httpd.conf:
AddType application/x-httpd-php .php
I have this and the DirectoryIndex - the problem is that my script does
not end in a .php extention. (GForge )
If I rename the file projects.php and point to that, it works, but
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 31, 2004 12:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: RE: [PHP] Apache 2.0.52 / PHP 4.3.10 Integration Question...
Andrew Kreps wrote:
I had to add this line to my httpd.conf:
AddType application/x-httpd-php .php
I
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 11:55:13 -0800, Robin Getz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have this and the DirectoryIndex - the problem is that my script does not
end in a .php extention. (GForge )
If I rename the file projects.php and point to that, it works, but that
means an entire re-write of the
Robin Getz wrote:
Andrew Kreps wrote:
I had to add this line to my httpd.conf:
AddType application/x-httpd-php .php
I have this and the DirectoryIndex - the problem is that my script
does not end in a .php extention. (GForge )
If I rename the file projects.php and point to that, it works, but
Robin Getz wrote:
Andrew Kreps wrote:
I had to add this line to my httpd.conf:
AddType application/x-httpd-php .php
I have this and the DirectoryIndex - the problem is that my script does
not end in a .php extention. (GForge )
If I rename the file projects.php and point to that, it works, but
used to work with apache 2.0.40 and php 4.2.3 - but what happens
now, is I actually get passed the php script back as text to the browser.
All of the methods I've seen in the past used a Forcetype directive
and PATH_INFO.
Files projects
ForceType application/x-httpd-php
/Files
The prize goes to Mark Charette of [EMAIL PROTECTED] for reading the
apache manual in more detail than I.
After Reading
http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/mod/core.html#forcetype
Then adding:
ForceType application/x-httpd-php
Things work great.
Thanks
-Robin
--
PHP General Mailing List
Mark Charette wrote:
Robin Getz wrote:
I guess the question is - how to make a file that does not end in .php
or have any extension, be understood as a php file?
ForceType directive.
I was thinking the same thing, but after doing some reading it seems
Apache 2 uses a different method now
AcceptPathInfo On
/Files
Which used to work with apache 2.0.40 and php 4.2.3 - but what happens
now, is I actually get passed the php script back as text to the browser.
All of the methods I've seen in the past used a Forcetype directive
and PATH_INFO.
Files projects
ForceType application/x-httpd-php
-Original Message-
From: Robin Getz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 31, 2004 1:40 PM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: [PHP] Apache 2.0.52 / PHP 4.3.10 Integration Question...
Hi.
I am trying to get Apache 2.0.52 / PHP 4.3.10 working with some scripts I
am using
in the dll and
sapi folders to the main folder (e.g. C:\php). Next,
I inserted these following lines to httpd.conf file
(Apache configuration file):
# For PHP 4
Action application/x-httpd-php /php/php.exe
# specify the directory where php.ini is
SetEnv PHPRC C:/php
Next, I Created a file named hello.php
Hi Folks
A few days ago on the list I saw someone mention a package that
includes apache, mysql and php for Windows. The one install file
included all these programs. Anyone remember what it was?
I've checked google and searched through my email list but I can't
seem to find it!
Thanks
I believe you are looking for:
http://www.easyphp.org
HTH!
--Sam
Shane Nelson wrote:
Hi Folks
A few days ago on the list I saw someone mention a package that
includes apache, mysql and php for Windows. The one install file
included all these programs. Anyone remember what
critical updates this
started to become an issue.
We have rebuilt servers, and installed apache+modssl+php from /usr/ports,
as well as manually and have been unable to resolv this issue.
We are using a generic installation of apache+modssl+php with the included
php.ini, only modifications being
For the first time ever I installed FreeBSD 4.9, I then installed Apache 1.3 and PHP
4.3.3-CGI from /usr/ports on the
machine. It seems that everything is ok, but when I try to use a .php file it does not
run it through the parser. So
when I hit test.php in my browser it outputs:
?
print Test
Tom Ray [List] wrote:
[snip]...
?php
print Test 123;
?
I'm sure I'm missing a line or two in my httpd.conf, but I really don't know what
they would be. Anyone with experience
with FreeBSD/Apache/PHP give me a hand?
Do you have the following line in your httpd.conf:
AddType application/x
Tom Ray [List] wrote:
For the first time ever I installed FreeBSD 4.9, I then installed Apache 1.3 and PHP
4.3.3-CGI from /usr/ports on the
machine. It seems that everything is ok, but when I try to use a .php file it does not
run it through the parser. So
when I hit test.php in my browser
] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: PHP General [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 00:11:42 +0200
Subject: Re: [PHP] Apache 1.3/PHP
Tom Ray [List] wrote:
[snip]...
?php
print Test 123;
?
I'm sure I'm missing a line or two in my httpd.conf, but I really don't know what
:
01/22/2004 05:25 Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: [PHP]
Apache 1.3/PHP
PM
--- Tom Ray [List] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems that everything is ok, but when I try to use a .php
file it does not run it through the parser.
Make sure this is in your httpd.conf:
AddType application/x-httpd-php .php
Of course, also make sure you have PHP. :-)
Chris
=
Chris
--- Tom Ray [List] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As far as AddType goes for PHP this is what I have:
[snip]
IfModule mod_php4.c
AddType application/x-httpd-php .php
AddType application/x-httpd-php-source .phps
/IfModule
My bet is that you didn't build Apache with PHP
-
From: BAO RuiXian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tom Ray [List] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: PHP General [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 00:11:42 +0200
Subject: Re: [PHP] Apache 1.3/PHP
Tom Ray [List] wrote:
[snip]...
?php
print Test 123;
?
I'm sure I'm missing a line
.php
AddType application/x-httpd-php-source .phps
/IfModule
Apache started with no problems with that config?
I added the AddType line outside of that and it's still not working. Thanks for the
suggestion, please if you have any
others I would love to know. I'm going to need to build
. env. is on win2k pro + sp4, php 5.00b2, apache 2.0.48, mysql
4.0.16, MS Access(?), XML, XSLT and without worries.
production env. - i do not care (actually i can't do anything about it.)
but recommend whatever linux (free), and php 4.3.4, apache 2.0.48, and
mysql 4.0.16.
in real life, our server
, but in the last 3 weeks it has been 5-6 times a
day.
We just switched to Apache 1.3.2 (using PHP 4.3.4 on both machines.) and we
have had 0 problems across the board in 3 days of operation now.
So there you go - if you are OK with instability then go for it - if not,
choose Apache 1.3.x
PS. Anyone out
Thanks to all who replied!
I will try to avoid using PHP 4 on Apache 2.
Does PHP 5 look like it will suit apache 2 for production?
Yves Arsenault
Carrefour Infotech
5, Acadian Dr.
Charlottetown, PEI
C1C 1M2
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(902)368-1895 ext.242
-Original Message-
From: Mike Morton
Hello,
This may be very old, but I thought I would ask.
Is this warning outdated?
http://www.php.net/manual/en/install.apache2.php
Do not use Apache 2.0 and PHP in a production environment neither on Unix
nor on Windows.
I'm running RedHat 9.
I've got Apache 2.0.48 running and was ready
Hi there,
when I had Gentoo Linux, I was using Apache 2.0.48 with PHP 4.3.4 installed
from Gentoo portage. It was running 10 smallscale php/mysql based
virtualhosts without any difficulties.
On Friday 05 December 2003 15:24, Yves Arsenault wrote:
Is this warning outdated?
http://www.php.net
Would anyone know of the issues that might affect PHP 4.3.4 and Apache
2.0.48 ?
Thanks,
Yves
-Original Message-
From: Martin Hudec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 5 dcembre 2003 10:52
To: PHP-General
Subject: Re: [PHP] Apache 2 + PHP
Hi there,
when I had Gentoo Linux, I was using
Chris Shiflett wrote:
A parser is called every time a page is accessed. If no page is
defined, the home page is loaded. Subsequent pages are linked with
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=parser
Very amusing.
Okay, dispatcher would probably be a better name. It preps the
environment
Hello,
httpd v1.3.27, php v4.3.0.
I have a web page I wish to restrict access. I prefer to use the
standard apache httpd authentication with .htaccess and password file.
This method does not seem to work with PHP.
A parser is called every time a page is accessed. If no page is
defined,
--- news.php.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a web page I wish to restrict access. I prefer to use the
standard apache httpd authentication with .htaccess and password
file. This method does not seem to work with PHP.
This method is independent of the type of resource being used, so it
Hello guys,
we have a strange problem with apache and php. apache 1.3.27 and php 4.23 is
running on a solaris-machine with 2 ipadresses. apache serves request at
both interfaces.
Everything works fine, but every 6 days at one ip-address the clients get no
response from apache. Apache logs
Tim,
thanks but it still doesn't work. What puzzles me is that last night I
reinstalled a 'vanilla' install of RedHat 8 from the distribution where I
selected PHP and Apache. So now I am running PHP 4.2.2 and Apache 2.0.40, I
make the change you recommened to httpd.conf, stop and restart
(!) for it.
Hope it will help
Thursday, January 9, 2003, 7:52:12 PM, you wrote:
GT Tim,
GT thanks but it still doesn't work. What puzzles me is that last night I
GT reinstalled a 'vanilla' install of RedHat 8 from the distribution where I
GT selected PHP and Apache. So now I am running PHP 4.2.2 and Apache
that
Apache may not be configured correctly. So I edited httpd.conf and added the
Add Type line for x-type-httpd .php. I am running Apache 2.0.40 on RedHat 8
and PHP 4.3.0pre2. Can anyone tell me what I am doing wrong? What should the
modifications be to httpd.conf for PHP?
Thanks in advance
Platform Consulting
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Gareth Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 9 January 2003 12:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PHP] apache and php
I am trying to run a PHP page from my browser (Mozilla) and
each time I load
server is RH7.3, Apache and PHP are compiled from source, staticly,
not as modules.
I don't know why the USR1 signal appears to have changed, but on RH the
nice way of restarting apache is service httpd restart. Does this work?
HTH
Chris
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net
with PHP 4.2.3 that it stops working.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hewitt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 12:56 AM
To: James Mackie
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PHP] Apache 1.3.26 + PHP 4.2.3
James Mackie wrote:
On most of my servers that are running
James Mackie wrote:
Since I installed apache from source and not an RPM I do not have an
rc file that the service command would use. I start apache in the
rc.local file. -USR1 should be the 'NICE' way to reload the
configuration files as per the apache documentation and has worked
for many
At 01:54 PM 10/1/02 +0200, Erwin wrote:
James Mackie wrote:
Since I installed apache from source and not an RPM I do not have an
rc file that the service command would use. I start apache in the
rc.local file. -USR1 should be the 'NICE' way to reload the
configuration files as per the
: [PHP] Apache 1.3.26 + PHP 4.2.3
At 01:54 PM 10/1/02 +0200, Erwin wrote:
James Mackie wrote:
Since I installed apache from source and not an RPM I do not have an
rc file that the service command would use. I start apache in the
rc.local file. -USR1 should be the 'NICE' way to reload
: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 6:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PHP] Apache 1.3.26 + PHP 4.2.3
James Mackie wrote:
Since I installed apache from source and not an RPM I do not have an
It would have existed before you compiled/installed from source
(assuming apache was installed
instead of
reloading the config files. (-HUP still works as it should).
Base server is RH7.3, Apache and PHP are compiled from source, staticly,
not as modules.
PHP is compiled as follows:
./configure --with-apache=path --with-mysql=path --with-gd
--enable-trackvars
Aside from this everything works
Hello,
Which version of apache and which version of php are good for work
together ?
Thank for your help...
Edward.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
] apache and php
Hello,
Which version of apache and which version of php are good for work
together ?
Thank for your help...
Edward.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net
Danny Shepherd wrote:
For release systems, the recommended setup is Apache 1.3.26 + PHP4.2.2
They are good for work under Linux RedHat ( 6.x / 7.x ) system ?
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Danny Shepherd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 11:30 AM
Subject: Re: [PHP] apache and php
Danny Shepherd wrote:
For release systems, the recommended setup is Apache 1.3.26 + PHP4.2.2
f95d8860$0200a8c0@DANNYS...
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Danny Shepherd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 11:30 AM
Subject: Re: [PHP] apache and php
Danny Shepherd wrote:
For release systems, the recommended setup is Apach
So, which version of apache and php are the best for working together under any
OS system ?
Scott Fletcher wrote:
I wouldn't jump on Apache 2.0.39 for the production website and some PHP
features does not work for that version. That apache is in beta testing
stage, so it will be a while
The latest stable versions of both. Apache 1.3.26 and PHP 4.2.2.
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, which version of apache and php are the best for working together under any
OS system ?
Scott Fletcher wrote:
I wouldn't jump on Apache 2.0.39 for the production website
as well for about 4 months without any problems that weren't
my fault.
HTH
chris
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday, July 30, 2002, at 12:25 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, which version of apache and php are the best for working together
under any
OS system ?
--
PHP General Mailing List (http
On Mon, 2002-07-15 at 18:30, Gerard Samuel wrote:
I dont think Apache 2 or php 4.3.x are meant for production boxes..
My opinion, the latest verion of apache 1.3.x and php 4.1.2 (my test
box
is 4.2.1 but thats ok)
Apache2 is meant for production.
Php 4.2.1 is meant for production
I've had a hunt through the mail archives but can't find a definite
answer:
Is Apache 2.0.x and PHP 4.2.x/4.3.x on Linux a viable proposition yet in a
production environment?
I guess the diversity of experiences described in the archives probably
means no, but what is the current opinion
:
Is Apache 2.0.x and PHP 4.2.x/4.3.x on Linux a viable proposition yet
in a production environment?
I guess the diversity of experiences described in the archives
probably means no, but what is the current opinion? Some of the
archive messages I read are quite old now
Is Apache 2.0.x and PHP 4.2.x/4.3.x on Linux a viable proposition yet in a
production environment?
Nope
-Rasmus
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
I dont think Apache 2 or php 4.3.x are meant for production boxes..
My opinion, the latest verion of apache 1.3.x and php 4.1.2 (my test box
is 4.2.1 but thats ok)
Michael Hall wrote:
I've had a hunt through the mail archives but can't find a definite
answer:
Is Apache 2.0.x and PHP 4.2.x/4.3
Yes Miguel, i've set all the required environment to the .bash_profile for
the user oracle.
What im wondering are , i've also installed oracle/php/apache in AIX server
and my php scripts with ora function just work. But for the RedHat Linux i
should run apache as oracle/dba. I've also set all
1 - 100 of 154 matches
Mail list logo
