Nathan Rixham wrote:
Project: PHP Common Objects and Datatypes
Has anything been setup for project COD-pieces yet? I like this name! ;)
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Marcus Gnaß wrote:
Nathan Rixham wrote:
Project: PHP Common Objects and Datatypes
Has anything been setup for project COD-pieces yet? I like this name! ;)
Hi Markus,
Actually, yes it has - the project, well working group, has been called
voom.
So far there are 8 developers including
Nathan Rixham wrote:
Marcus Gnaß wrote:
Nathan Rixham wrote:
Project: PHP Common Objects and Datatypes
Has anything been setup for project COD-pieces yet? I like this name! ;)
Actually, yes it has - the project, well working group, has been
called voom.
Sounds fine too! ;)
If you're
Assunto: Re: [PHP] maybe we could all?
Nathan Rixham wrote:
Marcus Gnaß wrote:
Nathan Rixham wrote:
Project: PHP Common Objects and Datatypes
Has anything been setup for project COD-pieces yet? I like this name! ;)
Actually, yes it has - the project, well working group, has been
called voom
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 01:35 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
and on the other side.. to open things up
interface Object {
}
or
abstract class Object {
}
or
class Object {
}
These braces are all wrong.
Cheers,
Rob.
--
http://www.interjinn.com
Application and Templating Framework
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 19:59 -0800, Kyle Terry wrote:
I demand Dan and Nathan to go to bed now.
Together?
;)
Cheers,
Rob.
--
http://www.interjinn.com
Application and Templating Framework for PHP
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit:
On Jan 19, 2009, at 6:57 PM, Nathan Rixham wrote:
Project: PHP Common Objects and Datatypes
method: for everybody who wishes to contribute, and for everybody
to review, discuss and work on the same classes.
what are they: classes we can all use, that have been discussed,
reviewed and
...
Um, PEAR?
--
Richard Heyes
HTML5 Graphing for Firefox, Chrome, Opera and Safari:
http://www.rgraph.org (Updated January 17th)
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[snip]
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 01:35 +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
and on the other side.. to open things up
interface Object {
}
or
abstract class Object {
}
or
class Object {
}
These braces are all wrong.
[/snip]
Uh...no they're not. (And you knew I was going to say that :) )
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Shawn McKenzie nos...@mckenzies.netwrote:
Kyle Terry wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Nathan Rixham nrix...@gmail.com
wrote:
Eric Butera wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Kyle Terry k...@kyleterry.com
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at
On Jan 20, 2009, at 12:02 PM, Kyle Terry wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Shawn McKenzie
nos...@mckenzies.netwrote:
Kyle Terry wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Nathan Rixham nrix...@gmail.com
wrote:
Eric Butera wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Kyle Terry
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 9:28 AM, Jason Pruim japr...@raoset.com wrote:
On Jan 20, 2009, at 12:02 PM, Kyle Terry wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Shawn McKenzie nos...@mckenzies.net
wrote:
Kyle Terry wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Nathan Rixham nrix...@gmail.com
wrote:
Kyle Terry wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Nathan Rixham nrix...@gmail.com wrote:
Eric Butera wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Kyle Terry k...@kyleterry.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Daniel Brown danbr...@php.net wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 19:58, Edmund
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 22:59, Kyle Terry k...@kyleterry.com wrote:
I demand Dan and Nathan to go to bed now.
I consider Nathan a friend and talented programmer, but nothing
could make me interested in that way, Kyle.
--
/Daniel P. Brown
daniel.br...@parasane.net || danbr...@php.net
2009/1/20 Nathan Rixham nrix...@gmail.com
Project: PHP Common Objects and Datatypes
method: for everybody who wishes to contribute, and for everybody to
review, discuss and work on the same classes.
what are they: classes we can all use, that have been discussed, reviewed
and agreed
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Edmund Hertle
edmund.her...@student.kit.edu wrote:
2009/1/20 Nathan Rixham nrix...@gmail.com
Project: PHP Common Objects and Datatypes
method: for everybody who wishes to contribute, and for everybody to
review, discuss and work on the same classes.
Kyle Terry wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Edmund Hertle
edmund.her...@student.kit.edu wrote:
2009/1/20 Nathan Rixham nrix...@gmail.com
Project: PHP Common Objects and Datatypes
method: for everybody who wishes to contribute, and for everybody to
review, discuss and work on the
2009/1/20 Nathan Rixham nrix...@gmail.com
sounds good; (discussion begins) - but if we're all going to use them in
production maybe we'd need to use say php 5.1.6 or the most common accross
all os's and servers..? how many servers will have php 5.3 support from the
off (think redhat servers!)
Edmund Hertle wrote:
2009/1/20 Nathan Rixham nrix...@gmail.com
sounds good; (discussion begins) - but if we're all going to use them in
production maybe we'd need to use say php 5.1.6 or the most common accross
all os's and servers..? how many servers will have php 5.3 support from the
off
2009/1/20 Nathan Rixham nrix...@gmail.com
sounds like a starting point. and the starting point imho, interfaces and
abstracts, then implementations.
[can't wait for a discussion on the implementation of Email lmfao]
can i gather that this is a postive response and a few interested parties?
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Edmund Hertle
edmund.her...@student.kit.edu wrote:
2009/1/20 Nathan Rixham nrix...@gmail.com
sounds like a starting point. and the starting point imho, interfaces and
abstracts, then implementations.
[can't wait for a discussion on the implementation of
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Kyle Terry k...@kyleterry.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Edmund Hertle
edmund.her...@student.kit.edu wrote:
2009/1/20 Nathan Rixham nrix...@gmail.com
sounds like a starting point. and the starting point imho, interfaces and
abstracts, then
Eric Butera wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Kyle Terry k...@kyleterry.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Edmund Hertle
edmund.her...@student.kit.edu wrote:
2009/1/20 Nathan Rixham nrix...@gmail.com
sounds like a starting point. and the starting point imho,
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Nathan Rixham nrix...@gmail.com wrote:
Eric Butera wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Kyle Terry k...@kyleterry.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Edmund Hertle
edmund.her...@student.kit.edu wrote:
2009/1/20 Nathan Rixham
Kyle Terry wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Nathan Rixham nrix...@gmail.com wrote:
Eric Butera wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Kyle Terry k...@kyleterry.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Edmund Hertle
edmund.her...@student.kit.edu wrote:
2009/1/20 Nathan Rixham
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Nathan Rixham nrix...@gmail.com wrote:
Kyle Terry wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Nathan Rixham nrix...@gmail.com wrote:
Eric Butera wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Kyle Terry k...@kyleterry.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:58 PM,
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Eric Butera eric.but...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Nathan Rixham nrix...@gmail.com wrote:
Kyle Terry wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Nathan Rixham nrix...@gmail.com
wrote:
Eric Butera wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at
Kyle Terry wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Eric Butera eric.but...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Nathan Rixham nrix...@gmail.com wrote:
and on the other side.. to open things up
interface Object {
}
or
abstract class Object {
}
or
class Object {
}
nothing
Eric Butera wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Nathan Rixham nrix...@gmail.com wrote:
Kyle Terry wrote:
and on the other side.. to open things up
interface Object {
}
or
abstract class Object {
}
or
class Object {
}
nothing else for now:
reason:
to address the current and forseable
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 9:04 PM, Nathan Rixham nrix...@gmail.com wrote:
Eric Butera wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Nathan Rixham nrix...@gmail.com wrote:
Kyle Terry wrote:
and on the other side.. to open things up
interface Object {
}
or
abstract class Object {
}
or
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 19:58, Edmund Hertle
edmund.her...@student.kit.edu wrote:
Well, I think we should not go to fast... maybe we are setting up SVN,
webspace, domain, mailing-list and in the end this is only used by 4-5
people. Because than this can be discussed on this mailinglist. But if
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Daniel Brown danbr...@php.net wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 19:58, Edmund Hertle
edmund.her...@student.kit.edu wrote:
Well, I think we should not go to fast... maybe we are setting up SVN,
webspace, domain, mailing-list and in the end this is only used by
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 20:12, Nathan Rixham nrix...@gmail.com wrote:
lol and sourceforge [doh]; that way if anything takes off natural user base
and integrated promotion most active - possibly with aid of tony :D
There's also Google Code, or - if you guys want to be
less-restricted - you
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Daniel Brown danbr...@php.net wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 20:12, Nathan Rixham nrix...@gmail.com wrote:
lol and sourceforge [doh]; that way if anything takes off natural user
base
and integrated promotion most active - possibly with aid of tony :D
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Kyle Terry k...@kyleterry.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Daniel Brown danbr...@php.net wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 19:58, Edmund Hertle
edmund.her...@student.kit.edu wrote:
Well, I think we should not go to fast... maybe we are setting up
Eric Butera wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Kyle Terry k...@kyleterry.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Daniel Brown danbr...@php.net wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 19:58, Edmund Hertle
edmund.her...@student.kit.edu wrote:
Well, I think we should not go to fast... maybe we
Daniel Brown wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 19:58, Edmund Hertle
edmund.her...@student.kit.edu wrote:
Well, I think we should not go to fast... maybe we are setting up SVN,
webspace, domain, mailing-list and in the end this is only used by 4-5
people. Because than this can be discussed on
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Nathan Rixham nrix...@gmail.com wrote:
Daniel Brown wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 19:58, Edmund Hertle
edmund.her...@student.kit.edu wrote:
Well, I think we should not go to fast... maybe we are setting up SVN,
webspace, domain, mailing-list and in the
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Nathan Rixham nrix...@gmail.com wrote:
Eric Butera wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Kyle Terry k...@kyleterry.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Daniel Brown danbr...@php.net wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 19:58, Edmund Hertle
Bastien Koert wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Nathan Rixham nrix...@gmail.com wrote:
Daniel Brown wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 19:58, Edmund Hertle
edmund.her...@student.kit.edu wrote:
Well, I think we should not go to fast... maybe we are setting up SVN,
webspace, domain,
Kyle Terry wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Nathan Rixham nrix...@gmail.com wrote:
discuss [ wiki needed? ]
wiki will definitely be needed.
dan? :-)
+ a name, cos if we need to start prefixing.. and it can't be 4LC as can't
start with a number :p
The world's object?
Pobject
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 21:31, Nathan Rixham nrix...@gmail.com wrote:
dan - great offer, I'd like to take you up on it [could we install any extra
needed software, such as a wiki / list or something that allows discussion
and document storage made website available]
svn - a must imho
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Bastien Koert phps...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm in, sounds like fun and a great way to learn new stuff
This is what I was thinking too. I'm just not sure what sort of
contributions I could make to such a thing. It'd be an interesting
experience to try though.
--
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 7:03 PM, Daniel Brown danbr...@php.net wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 21:31, Nathan Rixham nrix...@gmail.com wrote:
dan - great offer, I'd like to take you up on it [could we install any
extra
needed software, such as a wiki / list or something that allows
Daniel Brown wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 21:31, Nathan Rixham nrix...@gmail.com wrote:
dan - great offer, I'd like to take you up on it [could we install any extra
needed software, such as a wiki / list or something that allows discussion
and document storage made website available]
svn -
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Eric Butera eric.but...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Bastien Koert phps...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm in, sounds like fun and a great way to learn new stuff
This is what I was thinking too. I'm just not sure what sort of
contributions I could
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:57:25PM +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
Project: PHP Common Objects and Datatypes
method: for everybody who wishes to contribute, and for everybody to
review, discuss and work on the same classes.
what are they: classes we can all use, that have been discussed,
Paul M Foster wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:57:25PM +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
Project: PHP Common Objects and Datatypes
method: for everybody who wishes to contribute, and for everybody to
review, discuss and work on the same classes.
what are they: classes we can all use, that have
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 03:29:29AM +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
Paul M Foster wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:57:25PM +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
snip
You really don't have enough to do, do you?
Paul
actually, way too much - but I like to learn, contribute, think about
what I'm
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Paul M Foster pa...@quillandmouse.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 03:29:29AM +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
Paul M Foster wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:57:25PM +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
snip
You really don't have enough to do, do you?
Paul
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 22:46, Paul M Foster pa...@quillandmouse.com wrote:
Incidentally, I'm relatively new to the list, but I see a lot of CCs
along with posts to the list. The CCs are only useful if non-subscribers
can post to the list. Is that the case?
Yes, sir. It's also part of
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Paul M Foster pa...@quillandmouse.comwrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 03:29:29AM +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
Paul M Foster wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:57:25PM +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
snip
You really don't have enough to do, do you?
Paul
Paul M Foster wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 03:29:29AM +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
Paul M Foster wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:57:25PM +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
snip
You really don't have enough to do, do you?
Paul
actually, way too much - but I like to learn, contribute, think
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Nathan Rixham nrix...@gmail.com wrote:
Paul M Foster wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 03:29:29AM +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
Paul M Foster wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:57:25PM +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
snip
You really don't have enough to do, do
Kyle Terry wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Eric Butera eric.but...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Bastien Koert phps...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm in, sounds like fun and a great way to learn new stuff
This is what I was thinking too. I'm just not sure what sort of
Kyle Terry wrote:
I demand Dan and Nathan to go to bed now.
yeah it's 4am; day job in 5 hours - kinda waiting on the mrs tonight;
she just released another mix onto the net and the process is long and
slow while she gets everything just so - damn good though - but always
seems to do it at
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 03:57:34AM +, Nathan Rixham wrote:
snip
welcome; good to see a new face - even if it is preformatted courier as
per :p
That preformatted courier sounds like your email client. I use mutt an
vim for mail.
Paul
--
Paul M. Foster
--
PHP General Mailing List
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:49:34PM -0500, Daniel Brown wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 22:46, Paul M Foster pa...@quillandmouse.com wrote:
Incidentally, I'm relatively new to the list, but I see a lot of CCs
along with posts to the list. The CCs are only useful if non-subscribers
can post
58 matches
Mail list logo
