Re: [PHP] Re: PHP-5.5.2 +opcache segfaults with Piwik

Just so that you know, I've posted in the forum topic as well: http://forum.piwik.org/read.php?2,105879 Regards, Daniel Fenn On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 12:42 AM, Lester Caine wrote: > Jan Ehrhardt wrote: >>> >>> Could you try to add a function_exists check to >>> >libs/upgradephp/upgrade.php? >>

Re: [PHP] Re: PHP-5.5.2 +opcache segfaults with Piwik

Jan Ehrhardt wrote: Could you try to add a function_exists check to >libs/upgradephp/upgrade.php? > >This at the function declaration of _json_encode: >if (!function_exists('_json_encode')) { function _json_encode($var, ... > >And a extra } at the end. This patch, together with upgrading to the

Re: [PHP] Re: PHP-5.5.2 +opcache segfaults with Piwik

Lester Caine in php.general (Sun, 01 Sep 2013 12:59:18 +0100): >Grant wrote: >>> >I've tried php-5.5.2 and 5.5.3 but both segfault with piwik unless the >>> >opcache is disabled. Someone filed a piwik bug but was told it's a >>> >php bug: >>> > >>> >http://dev.piwik.org/trac/ticket/4093 > >> Is th

Re: [PHP] Re: PHP-5.5.2 +opcache segfaults with Piwik

Grant wrote: I've tried php-5.5.2 and 5.5.3 but both segfault with piwik unless the >opcache is disabled. Someone filed a piwik bug but was told it's a >php bug: > >http://dev.piwik.org/trac/ticket/4093 Is this a known issue? I'm running my own port of piwik in production with eaccelerator

Re: [PHP] Re: PHP vs JAVA

On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 12:29 AM, Sebastian Krebs wrote: > Actually I think ".." is quite error-prone, because it is hard to > distinguish from "." or "_" on the _first_ glance, which makes the get > quickly through the code. [1] > I surround all operators except member access ("." and "->") with

Re: [PHP] Re: PHP vs JAVA

2013/8/22 David Harkness > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 7:56 PM, Curtis Maurand wrote: > >> Sebastian Krebs wrote: > > > Actually the problem is, that the dot "." is already in use. With > > > $foo.bar() you cannot tell, if you want to call the method "bar()" on >> the >> > object "$foo", or if you w

Re: [PHP] Re: PHP vs JAVA

On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 7:56 PM, Curtis Maurand wrote: > Sebastian Krebs wrote: > Actually the problem is, that the dot "." is already in use. With > $foo.bar() you cannot tell, if you want to call the method "bar()" on the > > object "$foo", or if you want to concatenate the value of "$foo" to

Re: [PHP] Re: PHP vs JAVA

Sebastian Krebs wrote: > 2013/8/21 Curtis Maurand > >> >> >> >> Sorry in advance for the top post. >> >> Use the right tool for >> the Job. I've use Java, C# and PHP. >> >> 1. I hate the >> Perl-like object calls in PHP. I'd rather use "." notation >> in C# and Java. It saves a lot of wear

Re: [PHP] Re: PHP vs JAVA

2013/8/21 Curtis Maurand > > > > Sorry in advance for the top post. > > Use the right tool for > the Job. I've use Java, C# and PHP. > > 1. I hate the > Perl-like object calls in PHP. I'd rather use "." notation > in C# and Java. It saves a lot of wear and tear on my left pinky > finger. > A

Re: [PHP] Re: PHP vs JAVA

Sorry in advance for the top post. Use the right tool for the Job.  I've use Java, C# and PHP. 1.  I hate the Perl-like object calls in PHP.  I'd rather use "." notation in C# and Java.  It saves a lot of wear and tear on my left pinky finger. 2.  Java and C# are both typed languages.  Say wha

Re: [PHP] Re: PHP vs JAVA

On 21 Aug 2013, at 15:01, "georg chambert" wrote: > my I shake the subject a little; Ive been doing some PHP and found it "ok" to > work with > not so much fuss, but that was PHP4, what about PHP5 ? > Dont really checked the difference but made a short-scan and found that it > had be > screwed

Re: [PHP] Re: PHP vs JAVA

2013/8/21 georg chambert > Hi, > > my I shake the subject a little; Ive been doing some PHP and found it "ok" > to work with > not so much fuss, but that was PHP4, what about PHP5 ? > Dont really checked the difference but made a short-scan and found that it > had be > screwed around with ? > > A

Re: [PHP] Re: PHP vs JAVA

Hi, my I shake the subject a little; Ive been doing some PHP and found it "ok" to work with not so much fuss, but that was PHP4, what about PHP5 ? Dont really checked the difference but made a short-scan and found that it had be screwed around with ? Any think, should I change to 5 ? BR geo

Re: [PHP] Re: [PHP-DEV] [PHP] PHP 5.5.0 final has been released!

I hope this will get people like WordPress to get up and support mysqli out of the box. going to cause big issues if they don't. On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Martin Amps wrote: > I second this - great to see both finally available. Fantastic release! > > Martin Amps | CIO > www.iCrac

Re: [PHP] Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.5.0 final has been released!

Awesome! On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 11:14 PM, Marco Pivetta wrote: > Well done! Congratulations! > On 20 Jun 2013 23:23, "Julien Pauli" wrote: > > > Hello! > > > > The PHP Development Team would like to announce the immediate release of > > PHP 5.5.0. This release includes a large number of new f

Re: [PHP] Re: [PHP-DEV] feature request : easy shared memory

On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 3:46 AM, Larry Garfield wrote: > On 03/14/2013 01:21 PM, Bob Weinand wrote: > >> Sharing active memory between processes goes against the "shared nothing" >>> design of PHP. The lack of the feature you're describing is itself a >>> feature. :-) >>> >>> If you had real shar

Re: [PHP] Re: [PHP-DEV] new FTP function

On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 9:26 PM, tamouse mailing lists wrote: > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Daniel Brown wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 10:33 AM, KISE wrote: >>> Paul Dragoonis, >>> >>> Actually it wont work i did tried it before, if the dir end with / it will >>> list the directories in

Re: [PHP] Re: [PHP-DEV] new FTP function

On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Daniel Brown wrote: > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 10:33 AM, KISE wrote: >> Paul Dragoonis, >> >> Actually it wont work i did tried it before, if the dir end with / it will >> list the directories inside the path you gave it and if it doesn't have any >> directories it

Re: [PHP] Re: PHP The Right Way (website)

On 10/14/2012 12:12 PM, Daniel Brown wrote: On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Jim Giner wrote: Sounds like a good idea, but as for me - if I was a newbie I'd have a problem with their very first instructions. It says right off the start to type in the following: php -5 localhost:8000

Re: [PHP] Re: PHP The Right Way (website)

On 10/14/2012 12:06 PM, tamouse mailing lists wrote: On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Jim Giner wrote: On 10/14/2012 1:10 AM, tamouse mailing lists wrote: This just dropped in my inbox the other day from Smashing #69: 2. PHP The Right Way If you are developing for the Web, the chances are

Re: [PHP] Re: PHP The Right Way (website)

On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Jim Giner wrote: >> > Sounds like a good idea, but as for me - if I was a newbie I'd have a > problem with their very first instructions. It says right off the start to > type in the following: > php -5 localhost:8000 That should be a capital S, not a five.

Re: [PHP] Re: PHP The Right Way (website)

On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Jim Giner wrote: > On 10/14/2012 1:10 AM, tamouse mailing lists wrote: >> >> This just dropped in my inbox the other day from Smashing #69: >> >>> 2. PHP The Right Way >>> >>> If you are developing for the Web, the chances are high that you have >>> to deal with P

Re: [PHP] Re: php can't insert data mysql table

> > I think the comment about your "cannot insert query" was because it really > did not make sense. Once truly cannot "insert a query". Since you ask > tho, a more approp message might be > "Insert query failed to execute.Error returned was " . mysqli_error() > . "Query was $q" > > As for your i

Re: [PHP] Re: php can't insert data mysql table

On 10/1/2012 12:20 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote: hey thanks guys adding debugging info worked. Actually it was mysqli_error() providing me with a specific error of where the problem was. Cannot insert query:Duplicate entry '0' for key 'PRIMARY' This is the data in the table mysql> select * from guita

Re: [PHP] Re: php can't insert data mysql table

hey thanks guys adding debugging info worked. Actually it was mysqli_error() providing me with a specific error of where the problem was. Cannot insert query:Duplicate entry '0' for key 'PRIMARY' This is the data in the table mysql> select * from guitarwars; ++-+

Re: [PHP] Re: php can't insert data mysql table

On 10/1/2012 9:12 AM, Tommy Pham wrote: On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 6:03 AM, Jim Giner wrote: In this case, I do think that your insert statement is incorrect - I could be wrong. I think the VALUES clause s/b just 'VALUE'. Also if you added MYSQLI_ERROR to your error handling you should get a ver

Re: [PHP] Re: php can't insert data mysql table

On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 6:03 AM, Jim Giner wrote: > In this case, I do think that your insert statement is incorrect - I could > be wrong. I think the VALUES clause s/b just 'VALUE'. Also if you added > MYSQLI_ERROR to your error handling you should get a very helpful message. > VALUES also wor

Re: [PHP] Re: PHP as Application Server

Hi, Once again I didn't read it completely (maybe I will do so), but my 2ct: I recently played with Ruby and Python and of course with their application server (at least a little bit). My experience was, that it is less fun as it sounds in the first place compared to a well designed webserver-int

Re: [PHP] Re: PHP as Application Server

to Matijn Woudt: you are right there should be something like: public void synchronized increment(), but that is not the point. Sure there are disadvantages and other problems but what Alessando is saying is "I would not use cure for cancer even if it existed because it can introduce other problems

Re: [PHP] Re: PHP as Application Server

On 9/26/12 10:18, "Matijn Woudt" wrote: >Writing scripts for an application server requires a much deeper >understanding of threads and computer internals,so as a result it >probably increases error rate. Well... yes and no. PHP's architecture pretty much keeps you from having to mess with thre

Re: [PHP] Re: PHP as Application Server

On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Maciej Liżewski wrote: > in Java (for example) you just write class: > class Counter { > static private counter = 0; > > public void increment() { > this.counter++; > } > } > And here's where things go wrong.. You assume ++ is an atomic operation, but in

Re: [PHP] Re: PHP as Application Server

On 9/26/2012 11:23 AM, Maciej Liżewski wrote: Well.. many things changed during last 30 years. Cobol is not mainstream, we have got OOP, Java, Python, Ruby, Google and other great things :) I am talking about stateful application server. There are plenty examples in other programming languages:

Re: [PHP] Re: PHP as Application Server

Well.. many things changed during last 30 years. Cobol is not mainstream, we have got OOP, Java, Python, Ruby, Google and other great things :) I am talking about stateful application server. There are plenty examples in other programming languages: Java has Jetty, Tomcat, Ruby On Rails, Python an

[PHP] Re: PHP Re: PHP Bounce messages

On 21 Sep 2012 at 20:56, tamouse mailing lists wrote: > On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 4:17 AM, Tim Streater wrote: >> On 21 Sep 2012 at 08:40, Lester Caine wrote: >> >>> I know that the php list are one of the 'reply to sender' email handling >>> camp rather than reply to list. >> >> I don't underst

Re: [PHP] Re: PHP Bounce messages

On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 4:17 AM, Tim Streater wrote: > On 21 Sep 2012 at 08:40, Lester Caine wrote: > >> I know that the php list are one of the 'reply to sender' email handling camp >> rather than reply to list. > > I don't understand this. I reply (not that I mail that often) just to the > lis

Re: [PHP] Re: [PHP-WEBMASTER] php error

can we see the code of the form ? On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Daniel Brown wrote: > On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 2:32 PM, tomas lagro > wrote: > > > > Hello, my name is tomas, i'm having a problem and i've checked a lot of > times the script and it is not that, because in my local xampp server

Re: [PHP] Re: [PHP-WEBMASTER] Re: [PHP] The Cat Signal

On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 13:31 -0500, Larry Garfield wrote: > Sales tax isn't the point with SOPA/PIPA. Thinks like the government > being able to force any site off the Internet at the ISP / DNS level on > the say-so of a private corporation are the point. And no, that's not a > defensible or a

Re: [PHP] Re: [PHP-WEBMASTER] Re: [PHP] The Cat Signal

Sales tax isn't the point with SOPA/PIPA. Thinks like the government being able to force any site off the Internet at the ISP / DNS level on the say-so of a private corporation are the point. And no, that's not a defensible or acceptable position. Breaking the Internet to prop up industries

Re: [PHP] Re: [PHP-WEBMASTER] Re: [PHP] The Cat Signal

On Fri, July 20, 2012 10:04, Lester Caine wrote: > In Europe VAT is applied even on on-line sales. It is the likes of Amazon > shipping bulk stock from overseas 'clients' into European warehouses and > then supplying them without VAT added directly in Europe that is the > problem! How can I compet

Re: [PHP] Re: [PHP-WEBMASTER] Re: [PHP] The Cat Signal

Paul M Foster wrote: There are two sides to every problem and simply fighting for one >side is as bad. What is needed is a reasoned debate rather than >things like 'The Cat Signal' which personally I find as >objectionable as the laws it's complaining about! The real problem is the VAT tax its

RE: [PHP] Re: [PHP-WEBMASTER] Re: [PHP] The Cat Signal

> -Original Message- > From: Lester Caine [mailto:les...@lsces.co.uk] > Sent: Friday, July 20, 2012 4:05 AM > To: php-general@lists.php.net > Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: [PHP-WEBMASTER] Re: [PHP] The Cat Signal > > Paul M Foster wrote: > > Here's another one: Th

Re: [PHP] Re: [PHP-WEBMASTER] Re: [PHP] The Cat Signal

On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 09:04:30AM +0100, Lester Caine wrote: > Paul M Foster wrote: > >Here's another one: There are currently discussions in the U.S. Congress > >in favor of forcing internet vendors to charge sales tax on*all* sales, > >regardless of whether the vendor has a presence in that st

Re: [PHP] Re: [PHP-WEBMASTER] Re: [PHP] The Cat Signal

Paul M Foster wrote: Here's another one: There are currently discussions in the U.S. Congress in favor of forcing internet vendors to charge sales tax on*all* sales, regardless of whether the vendor has a presence in that state or not. Imagine having to file state sales tax returns in 50 states.

Re: [PHP] Re: [PHP-WEBMASTER] Re: [PHP] The Cat Signal

On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 03:45:46PM -0400, Jeff Burcher wrote: > Hi, > > I have been out of the loop and just did some quick skimming of SOPA/PIPA to > see what all the fuss was about. PIPA seems a little vague, but SOPA seems > pretty straight forward, stop piracy of copyrighted materials. I don'

RE: [PHP] Re: [PHP-WEBMASTER] Re: [PHP] The Cat Signal

...@allredmetal.com > -Original Message- > From: Lester Caine [mailto:les...@lsces.co.uk] > Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 4:10 PM > To: php-general@lists.php.net > Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: [PHP-WEBMASTER] Re: [PHP] The Cat Signal > > Jeff Burcher wrote: > > I have been out of

Re: [PHP] Re: [PHP-WEBMASTER] Re: [PHP] The Cat Signal

Jeff Burcher wrote: I have been out of the loop and just did some quick skimming of SOPA/PIPA to see what all the fuss was about. PIPA seems a little vague, but SOPA seems pretty straight forward, stop piracy of copyrighted materials. I don't understand what is wrong with that? It depends on ho

RE: [PHP] Re: [PHP-WEBMASTER] Re: [PHP] The Cat Signal

Hi, I have been out of the loop and just did some quick skimming of SOPA/PIPA to see what all the fuss was about. PIPA seems a little vague, but SOPA seems pretty straight forward, stop piracy of copyrighted materials. I don't understand what is wrong with that? Thanks, Jeff Burcher - IT Dept Al

RE: [PHP] Re: php form action breaks script

> -Original Message- > From: Tim Dunphy [mailto:bluethu...@gmail.com] > Sent: 28 June 2012 01:18 > > Hey guys, > > It's been a little while since I've toyed with this, and I hope you > don't mind my coming back to you for some more advice. But I've > enjoyed some limited success with Davi

Re: [PHP] Re: php batch/queue framwork

Zend Server includes a job queue. It supports queuing up jobs directly in the UI or via a PHP API, and it includes a variety of scheduling and load management options. -- Bob Williams Notice: This communication, including attachmen

Re: [PHP] Re: php batch/queue framwork

On 06/29/2012 05:18 AM, Tom Sparks wrote: Forwarded Message: php-general_318334.ezm Re: php batch/queue framwork Friday, 29 June, 2012 6:30 AM From: "Shailesh N. Humbad" To: php-general@lists.php.net On 6/28/2012 11:58 AM, Tom Sparks wrote: I am looking for a batch/queue framework that is databa

Re: [PHP] Re: php form action breaks script

"Tim Dunphy" wrote in message news:caozy0em5duhby-qv+y1u-e+c5yd7g5utauhomoyu3z7jma-...@mail.gmail.com... Notice: Undefined index: subject in /Library/WebServer/Documents/examples/ch03/final/makemeelvis/sendemail.php on line 23 Notice: Undefined index: elvismail in /Library/WebServer/Documents/

Re: [PHP] Re: php form action breaks script

On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote: One more little thing: These notices: > Notice: Undefined index: subject in > /Library/WebServer/Documents/examples/ch03/final/makemeelvis/sendemail.php > on line 23 Notice: Undefined index: elvismail in > /Library/WebServer/Documents/examples

Re: [PHP] Re: php form action breaks script

On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote: > Hey guys, > > It's been a little while since I've toyed with this, and I hope you > don't mind my coming back to you for some more advice. But I've > enjoyed some limited success with David R's advice regarding adding > some strong quoting to th

Re: [PHP] Re: php form action breaks script

On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 2:17 AM, Tim Dunphy wrote: > Hey guys, > > It's been a little while since I've toyed with this, and I hope you > don't mind my coming back to you for some more advice. But I've > enjoyed some limited success with David R's advice regarding adding > some strong quoting to th

Re: [PHP] Re: php form action breaks script

It is a small price to pay for large block, especially if the text has any quotes. Personally, I can't keep them straight and delimit them, etc. Heredoc saves all that such stuff. $insert= MY_DEFINED; echo << On 06/15/2012 06:35 AM, Jim Giner wrote: Hear, Hear for heredocs. The only way to c

Re: [PHP] Re: php form action breaks script

Jim Lucas hat am 15. Juni 2012 um 18:39 geschrieben: > On 06/15/2012 06:35 AM, Jim Giner wrote: > > Hear, Hear for heredocs. The only way to code up your html. Took me a few > > months to discover it and haven't looked back since. > > > > > > > > The only problem I have with HEREDOC is I cann

Re: [PHP] Re: php form action breaks script

On 06/15/2012 06:35 AM, Jim Giner wrote: Hear, Hear for heredocs. The only way to code up your html. Took me a few months to discover it and haven't looked back since. The only problem I have with HEREDOC is I cannot use constants within them. -- Jim Lucas http://www.cmsws.com/ http://ww

Re: [PHP] Re: php form action breaks script

Al hat am 15. Juni 2012 um 14:29 geschrieben: > > > On 6/14/2012 7:28 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote: > > However if I change the form action to this, it breaks the page > > resulting in a white screen of death: error_reporting(E_ALL); ini_set('display_errors', 'On'); And what is the error message? -

Re: [PHP] Re: php form action breaks script

On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 10:17 PM, David Robley wrote: > Tim Dunphy wrote: > >> Hello list, >> >>  I was just wondering if I could get some opinions on a snippet of >> code which breaks a php web page. >> >>  First the working code which is basically an html form being echoed by >>  php: >> >> if (

Re: [PHP] Re: PHP: a fractal of bad design

[snip] a simple +1 will do [/snip] Ahthe good old days. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP] Re: PHP: a fractal of bad design

On 04/17/2012 05:43 AM, Bogdan Ribic wrote: Where's the "Like" button on this list? :) On 4/13/2012 01:44, Ross McKay wrote: On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 17:06:10 -0700, Daevid Vincent wrote: "There are only two kinds of languages: the ones people complain about and the ones nobody uses." -- Bjarne

RE: [PHP] Re: php in windows

> -Original Message- > From: Kirk Bailey [mailto:kbai...@howlermonkey.net] > Sent: April 11, 2012 10:11 PM > To: php-general@lists.php.net > Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: php in windows > > Steve, THERE IS NO SUCH FILE in tinyweb. It turns to the operating system > asspci

Re: [PHP] Re: php in windows

I don't want to sound rude but I did say this before, why don't you get zend server CE or xampp and install that? On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Kirk Bailey wrote: > Steve, THERE IS NO SUCH FILE in tinyweb. It turns to the operating system > asspciations to determine what to use to process

Re: [PHP] Re: php in windows

Steve, THERE IS NO SUCH FILE in tinyweb. It turns to the operating system asspciations to determine what to use to process the cgi, then captures the returned stdio output and feeds THAT back as part of the data stream back down the stack. Therefore, it is not interfacing with the windows opera

Re: [PHP] Re: php in windows

On 4/11/2012 9:42 AM, Steven Staples wrote: -Original Message- From: Kirk Bailey [mailto:kbai...@howlermonkey.net] Sent: April 11, 2012 1:02 AM To: php-general@lists.php.net Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: php in windows ok, there is a copy of index.php ion the cgibin, and this got WAY

RE: [PHP] Re: php in windows

> -Original Message- > From: Kirk Bailey [mailto:kbai...@howlermonkey.net] > Sent: April 11, 2012 1:02 AM > To: php-general@lists.php.net > Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: php in windows > > ok, there is a copy of index.php ion the cgibin, and this got WAY different > resu

Re: [PHP] Re: php in windows

ok, there is a copy of index.php ion the cgibin, and this got WAY different results. It puked an error. "CGI script /cgi-bin/index.php returned nothing" NOW W.T.F., over? I think that it's time for some rack time. 'Night all. On 4/11/2012 12:50 AM, Kirk Bailey wrote: ok, I just installed 5.

Re: [PHP] Re: php in windows

ok, I just installed 5.2.17 VC6X86. I have a simple test page, index.php; it spews the content code at me. On 4/10/2012 11:13 AM, Bogdan Ribic wrote: On 4/10/2012 04:05, Kirk Bailey wrote: The edition of php for windows I instaklled does not work. Which flavor of windows php DOES work properl

Re: [PHP] Re: php in windows

I am not running apache; I am running tinyweb, which is a cgi capable server. It does not need any special configuration to handle cgi, and worked out of the box with python. On 4/10/2012 11:13 AM, Bogdan Ribic wrote: On 4/10/2012 04:05, Kirk Bailey wrote: The edition of php for windows I inst

Re: [PHP] Re: php sendmail_from

On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 8:50 PM, alexus wrote: > using Drupal > If you're using Drupal to send the mail, or any module installed in Drupal, than there are most likely settings in Drupal (module) that allow you to set the from address. If these functions call the mail command with a different From

Re: [PHP] Re: php sendmail_from

using Drupal On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Jim Giner wrote: > And how are you generating the email? > > > > -- > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > -- http://alexus.org/ -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) T

Re: [PHP] RE: php-general Digest 9 Dec 2011 20:09:28 -0000 Issue 7604

On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 1:06 PM, David Savage wrote: > Would "ksort($sortarr,SORT_STRING)" on a 1 dimensional array with a key > comprised of > a person's name, > "-", and > time stamp > I..E. (key: david savage-2011-12-12 14:43:00) > actually delete duplicate keys from the array, if there were

Re: [PHP] RE: php-general Digest 9 Dec 2011 20:09:28 -0000 Issue 7604

On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 16:06, David Savage wrote: > I thought I posted this in the php.net web site under the "ksort" user notes, > but I don't know if it would be approved to be placed in the web site. > > Would "ksort($sortarr,SORT_STRING)" on a 1 dimensional array with a key > comprised of >

Re: [PHP] Re: PHP frameworks

Investing your time on Zend Framework is worth it.I do mostly php development under Magento Platform, and Zend Framework becomes one of the vital skills I need.Apart from that, ZF is also a well thought Library that is a joy to work with.As one mentioned, the best part of it it gives the option to

Re: [PHP] Re: PHP frameworks

On 21 July 2011 23:56, Shawn McKenzie wrote: > On 07/21/2011 03:59 PM, Chris Stinemetz wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> I am thinking about venturing into PHP frameworks, but I would like to >> get advice on what the correct selection would be for someone that is >> about intermediate in PHP knowledge.

Re: [PHP] Re: PHP frameworks

On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Shawn McKenzie wrote: > A la CakePHP.  Will automagically build controllers and views for the > admin of your tables/models if you wish. Oooh, interesting! I will check out CakePHP! Thanks for tip! :) -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscri

Re: [PHP] Re: PHP frameworks

On 07/21/2011 07:44 PM, Micky Hulse wrote: > On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Micky Hulse wrote: >> Your app models? > > More specifically, your app model data. :) A la CakePHP. Will automagically build controllers and views for the admin of your tables/models if you wish. -- Thanks! -Shawn h

Re: [PHP] Re: PHP frameworks

On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Micky Hulse wrote: > Your app models? More specifically, your app model data. :) -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP] Re: PHP frameworks

On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Jim Lucas wrote: > So, what would said admin interface allow you to administrate? Your app models? -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP] Re: PHP frameworks

On 7/21/2011 4:00 PM, Micky Hulse wrote: > +1 for CI. > > If you search the group archives, a little while back I asked about > micro PHP frameworks and got a ton of good replies. > > So folks, how'z about a PHP framework with a built-in admin interface? > That would be pretty sweet. :) > So, w

Re: [PHP] Re: PHP frameworks

+1 for CI. If you search the group archives, a little while back I asked about micro PHP frameworks and got a ton of good replies. So folks, how'z about a PHP framework with a built-in admin interface? That would be pretty sweet. :) -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscri

[PHP] Re: [PHP-DB] Re: [PHP] Re: [PHP-DB] Re: [PHP] Re: [PHP-DB] Re: [PHP] PHP EOL

@Stuart Ah, then you are right that they were not compliant. The code is not that old. Thank you so much for the links and information too. Much more than I expected. I did not know that they were sent OS-Independent, but that makes perfect sense. Again, please excuse my lack of understandi

Re: [PHP] Re: [PHP-DB] Re: [PHP] Re: [PHP-DB] Re: [PHP] PHP EOL

On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 7:11 AM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: > Hello Stuart, > After some closer look at the RFC Compliant manuals you suggested, > I have determined that the creator of that code was in fact RFC821 > Compliant. > Being that this was a code I found several years ago, RFC822 may not have

[PHP] Re: [PHP-DB] Re: [PHP] Re: [PHP-DB] Re: [PHP] PHP EOL

Hello Stuart, After some closer look at the RFC Compliant manuals you suggested, I have determined that the creator of that code was in fact RFC821 Compliant. Being that this was a code I found several years ago, RFC822 may not have been in effect. This being the reason (I believe) that the cr

Re: [PHP] Re: [PHP-DB] Re: [PHP] PHP EOL

I see. Yes, I was referring to the PHP manual. I will investigate the RFC manuals as well like you had noted. No offense taken. Thank you for the clarification. Best, Karl On Jul 3, 2011, at 6:07 PM, Stuart Dallas wrote: On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: @Stuart, Act

Re: [PHP] Re: [PHP-DB] Re: [PHP] PHP EOL

On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: > @Stuart, > Actually that is what made me look into the PHP_EOL Stuart. Wanting to do > things right. > Did you not read my initial email? I am not suggesting anyone adopt my > code. > The question was directed to what the differences are s

Re: [PHP] Re: [PHP-DB] Re: radio form submission

There must some place for this one: http://xkcd.com/231/ Maybe something near the mailing lists info -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP] Re: [PHP-DB] Re: radio form submission

On 29 June 2011 08:37, Tamara Temple wrote: > > On Jun 27, 2011, at 7:18 AM, Steve Staples wrote: > >> On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 16:11 -0500, Tamara Temple wrote: >>> >>> On Jun 24, 2011, at 1:35 PM, Richard Quadling wrote: On 24 June 2011 18:23, Tamara Temple wrote: > > On Jun 24,

Re: [PHP] Re: [PHP-DB] Re: radio form submission

On Jun 27, 2011, at 7:18 AM, Steve Staples wrote: On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 16:11 -0500, Tamara Temple wrote: On Jun 24, 2011, at 1:35 PM, Richard Quadling wrote: On 24 June 2011 18:23, Tamara Temple wrote: On Jun 24, 2011, at 10:28 AM, Richard Quadling wrote: On 24 June 2011 15:44, Vitalii D

Re: [PHP] Re: Php filter validate url

On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Jim Lucas wrote: > On 6/27/2011 8:25 AM, Plamen Ivanov wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Shawn McKenzie >> wrote: >>> On 06/27/2011 10:01 AM, Plamen Ivanov wrote: On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 5:44 PM, Shawn McKenzie wrote: > > On 06/26/2

Re: [PHP] Re: Php filter validate url

On 6/27/2011 8:25 AM, Plamen Ivanov wrote: > On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Shawn McKenzie wrote: >> On 06/27/2011 10:01 AM, Plamen Ivanov wrote: >>> On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 5:44 PM, Shawn McKenzie >>> wrote: On 06/26/2011 12:31 PM, Adam Tong wrote: > Hi, > > I wanted tu

Re: [PHP] Re: Php filter validate url

On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Shawn McKenzie wrote: > On 06/27/2011 10:01 AM, Plamen Ivanov wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 5:44 PM, Shawn McKenzie wrote: >>> >>> On 06/26/2011 12:31 PM, Adam Tong wrote: Hi, I wanted tu use php filters for validation to avoid regular expresio

Re: [PHP] Re: Php filter validate url

On 06/27/2011 10:01 AM, Plamen Ivanov wrote: > On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 5:44 PM, Shawn McKenzie wrote: >> >> On 06/26/2011 12:31 PM, Adam Tong wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I wanted tu use php filters for validation to avoid regular expresions. >>> Is it possible that FILTER_VALIDATE_URL only checks if th

Re: [PHP] Re: Php filter validate url

On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 5:44 PM, Shawn McKenzie wrote: > > On 06/26/2011 12:31 PM, Adam Tong wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I wanted tu use php filters for validation to avoid regular expresions. > > Is it possible that FILTER_VALIDATE_URL only checks if the string has > > http:// and do not check for the

Re: Re: [PHP] Re: [PHP-DB] Re: radio form submission

On 27 Jun 2011 at 13:18, Steve Staples wrote: > On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 16:11 -0500, Tamara Temple wrote: >> Well played, sir, well played. I think we should go through all the >> xkcd comics that relate to programming somehow and insert them in the >> php.net documentation :) >> >> > Tamara, kin

Re: [PHP] Re: [PHP-DB] Re: radio form submission

On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 16:11 -0500, Tamara Temple wrote: > On Jun 24, 2011, at 1:35 PM, Richard Quadling wrote: > > On 24 June 2011 18:23, Tamara Temple wrote: > >> On Jun 24, 2011, at 10:28 AM, Richard Quadling wrote: > >>> On 24 June 2011 15:44, Vitalii Demianets > >>> wrote: > And furthe

Re: [PHP] Re: [PHP-DB] Re: radio form submission

On 25 June 2011 22:11, Tamara Temple wrote: > On Jun 24, 2011, at 1:35 PM, Richard Quadling wrote: >> >> On 24 June 2011 18:23, Tamara Temple wrote: >>> >>> On Jun 24, 2011, at 10:28 AM, Richard Quadling wrote: On 24 June 2011 15:44, Vitalii Demianets wrote: > > And furthe

Re: [PHP] Re: Php filter validate url

On 27 Jun 2011 at 00:15, Richard Riley wrote: > In addition your content type in your post is incorrect. > > Your header contains > > Content-Type: multipart/alternative; > boundary=00151747b53cf2927204a6a46ebb > > But its not multipart. This happens a lot in this group and I dont > experience i

Re: [PHP] Re: Php filter validate url

On 06/26/2011 04:50 PM, Fatih P. wrote: > Guys, when you reply a mail, You should write your reply on the top of it, > not at the bottom of it. > makes it easier to follow. > Ready flame-throwers! -- Thanks! -Shawn http://www.spidean.com -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To un

Re: [PHP] Re: Php filter validate url

On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:15 AM, Richard Riley wrote: > > In mailing lists and usenet you should never top post. You integrate > your reply or "follow up". This is well documented and makes sense in > tech threads were context is everything. > > In adidition your content type in your post is inco

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >