Hi all,
Alex - Thanks! I also mentioned them on
http://picolisp.com/wiki/?interfacing and http://picolisp.com/wiki/?web,
though a bit of scrolling is needed for the latter.
Good to mention them on the Documentation page too, thanks Olaf. Looks
great to me.
And please, if anything is missing or
I took the chance to do it - did'nt know so far, that it is so easy to
get an account for editing the wiki pages.
Hope, I did not write anything silly in that entry for the libraries of A.W.
Otherwise ... well, it would be easy to correct that in place.
Greetings, Olaf
On 06.05.2016 10:29,
Hmmm... I don't know???
On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 7:53 AM, Alexander Burger
wrote:
> Hi Alexander,
>
> > Can you add my PicoLisp libraries page to the
> > http://picolisp.com/wiki/?Documentation page as well?
> > http://aw.github.io/picolisp/
>
> Should be no problem, but
Hi Alexander,
> Can you add my PicoLisp libraries page to the
> http://picolisp.com/wiki/?Documentation page as well?
> http://aw.github.io/picolisp/
Should be no problem, but what stops you from just doing it?
♪♫ Alex
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
Hi Erik,
The website looks great! (sorry, slow response).
Can you add my PicoLisp libraries page to the
http://picolisp.com/wiki/?Documentation page as well?
http://aw.github.io/picolisp/
Thanks!
AW
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Erik Gustafson
wrote:
> Hi
Well done Erik!
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Erik Gustafson
wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> I'm very excited to announce that the redesigned PicoLisp
> wiki is now running on the server! Have a look:
>
>http://picolisp.com
>
> In my (slightly biased) opinion, PicoLisp
Hi all,
Alex - nice work! This will be very helpful for newcomers.
Chri - Thanks for the recommendations. Share Tech is really cool, and
I think it compliments 'Exo' (the header font) very well. I'm very fond
of Inconsolata as well (it's been my terminal font a couple years now).
So those are my
Hi all,
> > For example you have the function maxi in the sample code.
> > When I search for that function in search, the result doesn't give me
> > anything useful, like the definition or file it is defined in, etc...
> > One has to find the picolisp ref page and the search in there.
> > Is
Hi Chri,
> Maybe there should be a trivial example like the factorial (maybe with
> recur/recurse),
> and a more powerful one related to the db and/or the html functions?
Great idea!
> Also, it seems to me that the monospaced font seems a bit outdated,
> especially beside the more modern ones
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 7:55 PM, Erik Gustafson
wrote:
> The general theme of the feedback was that there is too much text,
> not enough super simple code examples […].
Indeed. I'm no PicoLisp expert but I don't know nothing either, and
the first code example seems
Hi all,
Thanks for the feedback and kind words! I'll try to address all in this
mail,
starting with the common themes.
Wiki Search
---
I agree, everything about this is awkward. I'll play around with the CSS to
address the aesthetic issues that Bene raised. Both the input bar and
button
>
> Basically, it's super efficient.
>
I find that quote on the start site problematic. I would love to see it
changed. But redesign on its own is great.
2016-03-25 11:58 GMT+01:00 Jon Kleiser :
> Hi Erik,
>
> Great job! There is one feature I miss, however, and that’s the
Hi Erik,
Great job! There is one feature I miss, however, and that’s the old “section
links” that used to be on the left hand side. I can now use the search function
to find the “sections”, but that is too cumbersome. I think there should be
quick links for at least these two:
Articles &
[mailto:christophegrag...@gmail.com]
To: picolisp@software-lab.de
Sent: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 10:11:23 +0100
Subject: Re: Redesigned Wiki is Live
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 9:49 PM, <andr...@itship.ch> wrote:
> Please host the stylesheets on
> picolisp.com instead of using tracking CDN.?
I
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 9:49 PM, wrote:
> Please host the stylesheets on
> picolisp.com instead of using tracking CDN.?
I only see fonts (or infos about fonts + fonts) being retrieved from
fonts.googleapis.com, no CSS,
Although I may agree with this tracking defect, I guess
It's good to see the details worked out here.
But the main take away for me, is that in today's stylish
web landscape, it's important that sites look stylish.
And the site now looks stylish. Great and thanks to all
involved.
best regards,
Jakob
On 24/03/16 16:34, Erik Gustafson wrote:
> Hi
I can't add any more to the discussion (especially beyond bene), but I
still wanted to drop a line and say, thank you! It's a pleasure to
browse the new-look site.
All the best, --Rick.
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
Dear Erik,
Firstly the site looks really nice now, great look, I love it.
However I found that while using the search dialog the result is not always
that useful.
For example you have the function maxi in the sample code.
When I search for that function in search, the result doesn't give me
18 matches
Mail list logo