Bug#734279: jblas: FTBFS on most architectures since tests are enabled at build time

On 01/05/2014 06:23 AM, Roland Stigge wrote: > Source: jblas > Version: 1.2.0-5 > Severity: serious > > Hi, > > jblas FTBFS on most architectures since tests are enabled in 1.2.0-5. E.g., on > powerpc: Thanks for the bug report. I wonder if jblas actually functional at all on those architecture

Re: libnb-platform18-java_7.4+dfsg1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

On 01/05/2014 01:02 AM, Niels Thykier wrote: > On 2014-01-05 07:50, Debian FTP Masters wrote: >> >> There was an uncaught exception when processing your upload: >> Traceback (most recent call last): >> File "/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/dak/dak/process_upload.py", line 213, in >> wrapper >> re

Bug#734279: jblas: FTBFS on most architectures since tests are enabled at build time

On 01/05/2014 03:49 PM, Roland Stigge wrote: > On 05/01/14 19:08, tony mancill wrote: >>> jblas FTBFS on most architectures since tests are enabled in >>> 1.2.0-5. E.g., on powerpc: >> >> Thanks for the bug report. I wonder if jblas actually functional >> at

Bug#734243: closure-compiler: Install a useful manpage for ‘closure-compiler’ command

On 01/06/2014 12:41 PM, Ben Finney wrote: > package src:closure-compiler > tags 734243 + patch > thanks > > On 05-Jan-2014, Ben Finney wrote: >> I will work on a suitable manpage and submit it to the bug report for this. > > Attached to this message are two patches for the ‘closure-compiler’ pack

Bug#734279: jblas: FTBFS on most architectures since tests are enabled at build time

On 01/08/2014 12:45 AM, Roland Stigge wrote: > Hi! > > On 01/08/2014 07:24 AM, tony mancill wrote: >> I still wonder whether this package has ever been useful on >> non-i386/amd64 architectures. > > Why should it be less useful than on other architectures? We should

Bug#735892: libknopflerfish-osgi-framework-java: doesn't depend on default-jre and enforces installation of version 6 openjdk

On 01/18/2014 03:23 AM, Eric Lavarde wrote: > Package: libknopflerfish-osgi-framework-java > Version: 2.3.3-2 > Severity: normal > > Hi, > > as the subject says, the package doesn't depend on default-jre which > leads to installation to openjdk-6-jre in addition to the version 7 that > is already

Bug#735763: svnkit: FTBFS: [javac] /«BUILDDIR»/svnkit-1.7.5+dfsg/svnkit-javahl16/src/main/java/org/apache/subversion/javahl/SVNClient.java:32: error: SVNClient is not abstract and does not override ab

On 01/17/2014 09:34 AM, David Suárez wrote: > Source: svnkit > Version: 1.7.5+dfsg-2 > Severity: serious > Tags: jessie sid > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140114 qa-ftbfs > Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Thanks for the bug report. This is due to one of svnkit's build-dep

Bug#736365: tuxguitar: stable package depends on obsolete xulrunner-10.0

On 01/22/2014 01:57 PM, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Wed, 22 Jan 2014 20:03:16 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > >> The version of tuxguitar in wheezy still depends on xulrunner-10.0, >> whereas wheezy now has iceweasel 17 and will shortly (at least via >> -security) have 24. > > *sigh* > > Thanks

Bug#736365: tuxguitar: stable package depends on obsolete xulrunner-10.0

On 01/22/2014 12:03 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Package: tuxguitar > Version: 1.2-13 > Severity: important > X-Debbugs-CC: debian-rele...@lists.debian.org > > Hi, > > The version of tuxguitar in wheezy still depends on xulrunner-10.0, > whereas wheezy now has iceweasel 17 and will shortly (at le

Bug#736365: tuxguitar: stable package depends on obsolete xulrunner-10.0

On 01/26/2014 09:33 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sun, 2014-01-26 at 09:13 -0800, tony mancill wrote: >> On 01/22/2014 12:03 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >>> The version of tuxguitar in wheezy still depends on xulrunner-10.0, >>> whereas wheezy now has iceweasel 17 and

Re: libxml-security-java REMOVED from testing

On 02/01/2014 08:39 AM, Debian testing watch wrote: > FYI: The status of the libxml-security-java source package > in Debian's testing distribution has changed. > > Previous version: 1.5.5-2 > Current version: (not in testing) > Hint:

Bug#737369: omegat: We are two years behind upstream. (Has this package been abandoned?)

On 02/01/2014 05:52 PM, Kristof Csillag wrote: > Package: omegat > Version: 2.3.0.1+dfsg-3 > Severity: wishlist > > Latest package version is 2.3.0.1+dfsg-3, released on 04 Dec 2011. > Latest upstream stable version is 2.6.3 update3, released on 15 January 2014. > > The difference is more that 2

Bug#737969: libtcnative-1 breaks Tomcat's 'SSLProtocols'

On 02/07/2014 02:53 AM, Peter Grandi wrote: > Package: libtcnative-1 > Version: 1.1.24-1 > Severity: important > > Symptoms: > > The Tomcat 'SSLProtocol' configuration attribute is documented > as accepting several values, but on Debian 7/Wheezy (and > presumably others) only the values "SS

Bug#738425: sqlline: FTBFS: Compile failed

reopening - this bus was closed inadvertently by an incorrect changelog entry for libtritonus-java tony signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team . P

Bug#738583: libcglib-java - Uses jarjar without proper copyright or Built-Using

On 02/10/2014 12:54 PM, Bastian Blank wrote: > Package: libcglib-java > Version: 2.2.2+dfsg-5 > Severity: serious > > libcglib-java uses jarjar to incoporate libasm3-java. It does this > without mentioning the license of the incorporated stuff or even listing > it as Built-Using. Hi Bastian, Th

Bug#738579: Acknowledgement (libsisu-guice-java - $DebuggingClassWriter overrides final method visit)

On 02/10/2014 01:32 PM, Bastian Blank wrote: > I see this problem clearly in the shipped binaries: > > | public class com.google.inject.internal.asm.$ClassWriter extends > com.google.inject.internal.asm.$ClassVisitor { > | public final void visit(int, int, java.lang.String, java.lang.String, >

Bug#738579: libsisu-guice-java - $DebuggingClassWriter overrides final method visit

On 02/11/2014 06:39 AM, Eugene Zhukov wrote: > The cause of the problem is described here [0]. > I tried it out and downgraded asm dependency to 3.3.2 in > d/maven.rules. After reverting > core/src/com/google/inject/internal/util/LineNumbers.java to previous > revision (it seems to be the only clas

Bug#738583: libcglib-java - Uses jarjar without proper copyright or Built-Using

On 02/11/2014 04:29 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > I prepared an update of the cglib package on alioth: > > - The Built-Using field has been added > - debian/copyright now mentions the inclusion of the asm classes > - the asm license file is now included in cglib-nodep.jar like the jar > distributed

Re: sisu-guice_3.1.9+dfsg-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

On 02/11/2014 10:56 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: > On 2014-02-12 07:33, Debian FTP Masters wrote: >> >> libsisu-guice-java_3.1.9+dfsg-2_all.deb: Built-Using refers to non-existing >> source package libasm3-java (= 3.3.2-2) >> >> >> [...] > > You have to use source packages (i.e. "asm3" instead of "li

Bug#738583: libcglib-java - Uses jarjar without proper copyright or Built-Using

On 02/11/2014 10:58 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 12/02/2014 06:31, tony mancill a écrit : > >> The attribution looks appropriate to me. I changed the version number >> to we're not uploading a new upstream source version just to switch to >> XZ compression. That

Re: Bug#738789: libhamcrest-java: FTBFS: bad class file: hamcrest-core-1.3.jar(org/hamcrest/Description.class)

On 02/16/2014 08:32 PM, Daniel Schepler wrote: > On Sunday, February 16, 2014 11:54:12 PM Emmanuel Bourg wrote: >> Hi Daniel, >> >> I haven't been able to reproduce this issue, libhamcrest-java builds >> fine with pbuilder. Are you sure your build environment is clean? > > It looks like this is on

Bug#738789: libhamcrest-java: FTBFS: bad class file: hamcrest-core-1.3.jar(org/hamcrest/Description.class)

On 02/16/2014 08:32 PM, Daniel Schepler wrote: > On Sunday, February 16, 2014 11:54:12 PM Emmanuel Bourg wrote: >> Hi Daniel, >> >> I haven't been able to reproduce this issue, libhamcrest-java builds >> fine with pbuilder. Are you sure your build environment is clean? > > It looks like this is on

Bug#739999: tomcat7: FTBFS: Unit tests are failing ('java.net.BindException: Address already in use' error)

On 02/24/2014 11:55 AM, Miguel Landaeta wrote: > Package: src:tomcat7 > Version: 7.0.52-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) > > The full log is attached to this bug report. > > Relevant error message: > > [junit] INFO: Starti

Bug#740098: Patch to fix setting USB-serial adapters to 38400 bps

On 02/25/2014 03:41 PM, Jan Niehusmann wrote: > tag 740098 +patch > thanks > > The following patch should fix the reported issue. [..] Hi Jan, Thank you for the analysis and the patch. I have applied your patch along with a patch for 731151 (buffer overflow) and uploaded an updated package to

Bug#740360: Needs maven support

On 02/28/2014 08:42 AM, Matthew Vernon wrote: > Package: libjgrapht0.8-java > Version: 0.8.3-3 > Severity: normal > Tags: patch > > Hi, > > The enclosed patch adds maven support (i.e. it installs relevant > entries into /usr/share/maven-repo/), meaning that other java code > that builds with mave

Bug#740441: suggest jmxetric, provide convenient way to enable it

On 03/02/2014 06:12 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote: > Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > >> jmxetric looks interesting but I don't think tomcat7 should suggest a >> monitoring tool, apache2 doesn't suggest nagios3 for example. > > The difference is that jmxetric does JMX, so it is specific to Java app > servers,

Bug#740596: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/tomcat/util/descriptor/LocalResolver

On 03/03/2014 02:32 AM, Frederic Peters wrote: > Package: libtomcat6-java > Version: 6.0.39-1 > Severity: normal > > Hello, > > After libtomcat6-java was upgraded from 6.0.37-1 to 6.0.39-1, my Solr > installation (from the solr-jetty package, 3.6.2+dfsg-2), stopped working, > and an error 500 wit

Bug#740596: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/tomcat/util/descriptor/LocalResolver

On 03/13/2014 08:06 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 05/03/2014 07:17, tony mancill a écrit : > >> Thanks for reporting this. I checked and it looks like this class was >> recently added to tomcat6, and is connected with the response to >> CVE-2013-4590. 6.0.37 does

Bug#738789: libhamcrest-java: FTBFS: bad class file: hamcrest-core-1.3.jar(org/hamcrest/Description.class)

On 03/25/2014 04:07 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > This issue is really intriguing. When the build fails > hamcrest-core-1.3.jar is not corrupted (verified with zip --test) and > the compiled Description.class file is always the same (the md5sum is > constant in all cases). > > The random aspect of t

Bug#743707: jscommunicator fails to build from source

block 743707 by 734011 tags 743707 +confirmed thanks Hi Matthias, thank you for reporting this problem. I didn't get the build output on my system: > make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/jscommunicator-1.1.1' > ./make-release > run-detectors: unable to find an interpreter for /usr/bin/closu

Re: service-wrapper-java_3.5.22-3_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

istribution: unstable > Urgency: low > Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers > > Changed-By: tony mancill For those wondering, I have moved this package from collab-maint to pkg-java. I think it fits better there, and the previous maintainer, Remi Debay, consented to the change

Bug#745127: tuxguitar: Messages in ~/.xsession-errors

tags -1 +confirmed upstream thanks On 04/18/2014 01:47 AM, Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote: > Package: tuxguitar > Version: 1.2-18 > Severity: normal > > After only using tuxguitar a few seconds, I have gotten over 4000 lines > of messages in ~/.xsession-errors. This makes it much more difficult

Bug#745127: tuxguitar: Messages in ~/.xsession-errors

Err - too many keyboard shortcuts... Here's a potentially helpful link that includes a patch used on Eclipse: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=407077 tony signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team

Re: libjibx1.1-java_1.1.6a-4_amd64.changes REJECTED

On 04/24/2014 11:34 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 25/04/2014 07:03, Debian FTP Masters a écrit : > >> Version check failed: >> Your upload included the binary package libjibx-java, version 1.1.6a-4, for >> all, >> however oldstable already has version 1.2.1-1. >> Uploads to unstable must have a

Bug#747027: emma does not work with Java 7 bytecode

On 05/04/2014 01:16 PM, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > Package: libemma-java > Version: 2.0.5312+dfsg-4 > Severity: grave > > Running emma on bytecode generated by openjdk-7's javac fails, but it > works fine on Java code produced by openjdk 6. JDK 6 will not be part > of jessie. Hi Julian, This a

Re: Updated JavaCC version, version 6.1.0

On 05/01/2014 04:49 PM, Christopher Ainsley wrote: > Hello, > > I'm one of the principle committers on JavaCC, and I wanted to ask the > procedure to have the debian JavaCC package updated to the latest > version of JavaCC, 6.1.0. > > JavaCC is now live here: > > https://java.net/projects/javacc

Bug#748567: FTBFS: 'top' unavailable

On 05/18/2014 07:40 AM, Michael Tautschnig wrote: > Package: jenkins-memory-monitor > Version: 1.7-2 > Usertags: goto-cc > > During a rebuild of all packages in a clean sid chroot (and > cowbuilder+pbuilder) > the build failed with the following error. Please note that we use our > research > co

Bug#748567: FTBFS: 'top' unavailable

On 05/18/2014 08:59 AM, Michael Tautschnig wrote: > Hi Tony, > > [...] >> Looking at the org.jvnet.hudson.Top class used by this test, the parsing >> is potentially brittle, so I suspect the issue is related to differences >> in the output of top in your environment. >> >> If you could please inst

Bug#748567: FTBFS: 'top' unavailable

On 05/18/2014 10:47 AM, Michael Tautschnig wrote: > Hi Tony, > > [...] >> That explains the problem. It looks like your system has 256GB on it, > > Yes :-) > >> but the default for top is to display in KB, so the '+' (which indicates >> truncation) is tripping up the class that parses the outpu

Re: libstruts1.2-java_1.2.9-9_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 08:40:59PM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote: > On Sat, 31 May 2014 07:37:56 +0200 > Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > > Thank you for the fix. Could you also commit your changes on alioth please? > > OK, committed. Thank you for your notice, Emmanuel :) > > > When committed, > > >>W

Bug#750548: NMU debdiff for gluegen2_2.1.5-1.1

On 06/04/2014 05:49 AM, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > Hello Sylvestre, > > At Imagination Technologies (http://imgtec.com/) Dejan Latinovic has > found a solution to Debian bugs #750548. > > https://bugs.debian.org/750548 > > My NMU debdiff for gluegen2_2.1.5-1.1 is below, at the end of this

Bug#750548: NMU debdiff for gluegen2_2.1.5-1.1

On 06/05/2014 12:13 AM, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > On Wed, 2014-06-04 21:27:24 -0700, tony mancill wrote: >> On 06/04/2014 05:49 AM, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote: >>> Hello Sylvestre, >>> >>> At Imagination Technologies (http://imgtec.com/) Dejan Latinovi

Bug#747054: FTBFS: package javax.servlet.http does not exist

On 06/09/2014 02:28 AM, Michael Tautschnig wrote: > Hi Niels, all, > >> On 2014-05-31 07:25, Hideki Yamane wrote: >>> control: tags -1 +unreproducible >>> >>> Hi, >>> I've rebuilt eclipse package in current sid using pbuilder and didn't encounter any error. Can someone please confi

Re: Comments regarding libnu-htmlparser-java_1.4-1_amd64.changes

On 06/12/2014 11:17 AM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > Hi Emmanuel, > > On Thu, 12 Jun 2014, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: >> Le 12/06/2014 14:18, Thorsten Alteholz a écrit : >>> the license of some files says that: >>> "You are granted a license to use, reproduce and create derivative works >>> of this docu

Bug#751563: tuxguitar: depends on xulrunner which is no more

On 06/14/2014 04:52 AM, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Sat, 14 Jun 2014 12:04:00 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > >> Your package depends on: >> xulrunner-29 | xulrunner-24.0 | xulrunner-17.0 | xulrunner-10.0 | >> xulrunner-1.9.1 >> >> But iceweasel no longer provides a xulrunner binary. Note

Bug#751563: tuxguitar: depends on xulrunner which is no more

On 06/15/2014 07:36 AM, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Sat, 14 Jun 2014 09:13:58 -0700, tony mancill wrote: > >>> My tentative conclusion is that MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME was needed at some >>> time in the past, doesn't get set since ages, which doesn't cause any >>

Bug#745127: GLib-GObject-WARNING **: /tmp/buildd/glib2.0-2.40.0/./gobject/gclosure.c:688: unable to remove uninstalled invalidation notifier

After some more research, this warning message appears to be solely related to swt-gtk. Next step is to try a patch like the one Silenio Quarti developed and committed here: https://eclipse.googlesource.com/platform/eclipse.platform.swt/+/7ea8f6efbd6b9112bb64099daca39467f3a6d2f8%5E%21 tony

Bug#754643: gradle: FTBFS: Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Could not determine the local IP addresses for this machine.

On 07/12/2014 08:21 PM, Miguel Landaeta wrote: > Package: src:gradle > Version: 1.5-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) > > I'm unable to run gradle in a clean cowbuilder chroot. It dies on me > with a java.lang.RuntimeException er

Bug#755323: glassfish: FTBFS: [javac] /«PKGBUILDDIR»/appserv-jstl/src/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/JSTLXPathImpl.java:238: error: no suitable constructor found for JAXPExtensionsProvider

lway required to be True.) Does anyone on the Debian Java team have experience with this API change? (Also, if anyone is planning to upload imminently, please coordinate with me, as I have a few other minor packaging fixes that I'd like to push, along with converting the packaging repo over to

Bug#755794: missing license in debian/copyright

On 07/23/2014 04:28 AM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > Package: jakarta-jmeter > Version: 2.11-1 > Severity: serious > User: alteh...@debian.org > Usertags: ftp > X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org > thanks > > Dear Maintainer, > > please add the missing licenses of: > src/core/org/apach

Bug#755794: missing license in debian/copyright

On 07/23/2014 07:21 AM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > Hi Tony, > > On Wed, 23 Jul 2014, tony mancill wrote: >> I'm confused by this bug report. There are 391 .png files in the source >> package, and 61 alone in the ./src/ tree, and debian/copyright documents >>

Bug#756137: java.io.IOException: Failed to access resource /WEB-INF/lib/jstl.jar

On 07/26/2014 09:59 AM, Brian Burch wrote: > Package: tomcat7-examples > Version: 7.0.52-1 > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainer, > > The tomcat7 examples webapp does not start after a clean install. The stack > trace follows: Hello Brian, Thank you for the bug report. I'm not able to reprod

Bug#756137: java.io.IOException: Failed to access resource /WEB-INF/lib/jstl.jar

On 07/27/2014 11:41 AM, Brian Burch wrote: > On 27/07/14 16:06, tony mancill wrote: >> On 07/26/2014 09:59 AM, Brian Burch wrote: >>> Package: tomcat7-examples >>> Version: 7.0.52-1 >>> Severity: normal >>> >>> Dear Maintainer, >>&g

Bug#681726: eclipse: Upgrade Eclipse to Juno 4.2

On 07/06/2014 12:28 AM, Adrien Grellier wrote: > Hi, > > In my laboratory, we are using Debian as the official Linux distribution and > Eclipse as the official EDI. So I would like to know if there is any hope to > have the 4.* series in Debian before the freeze ? Or will we stay with the > 3.

Bug#758972: Please remove mojarra

On 08/23/2014 04:28 AM, Henri Salo wrote: > Package: mojarra > Version: 2.0.3-3 > Severity: critical > Tags: security > > Please remove mojarra source package from Debian as it has been unmaintained > and > contains several unfixed security vulnerabilities with no replies from > maintainer. > >

Bug#759039: java-gnome: [INTL:pt] Updated Portuguese translation & misplaced pt_BR translation

On 08/23/2014 04:35 PM, Américo Monteiro wrote: > Package: java-gnome > Version: 4.1.3-1 > Tags: l10n, patch > Severity: wishlist > > Updated Portuguese translation for java-gnome's po4a. > Translator: Américo Monteiro > Feel free to use it. > > ATENTION: The existing translation made by Vreixo

Bug#735227: activemq is marked for autoremoval from testing

On 08/20/2014 09:39 PM, Debian testing autoremoval watch wrote: > activemq 5.6.0+dfsg-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2014-08-29 > > It is affected by these RC bugs: > 735227: activemq: [activemq] Non sourced jquery Hi Emmanuel and Eugene, I see updates to the packaging in the pkg-ja

Bug#759163: mojarra: please upgrade to upstream release 2.2.8

Package: mojarra Version: please upgrade to 2.2.8 Severity: wishlist Filing a bug for this upgrade, which will address several open security issues with this package. Thank you, tony __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team

Bug#759470: libopensaml2-java: CVE-2014-3603

On 08/27/2014 04:07 AM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Package: libopensaml2-java > Severity: grave > Tags: security > Justification: user security hole > > Please see http://shibboleth.net/community/advisories/secadv_20140813.txt Hi Moritz - thank you for the bug report. I have prepared an upload

Bug#759565: service-wrapper: new upstream release available

On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 03:21:03PM +, Kill Your TV wrote: > Package: service-wrapper > Severity: wishlist > Tags: patch > > It would be nice to have Jessie released with a newer service-wrapper > package. Please consider updating to the latest stable release (3.5.25). > > Attached is a patch

Re: Help needed with updating some Java libraries (netlib-java, libmtj-java)

On 08/28/2014 07:01 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > when checking my Maintainer dashboard dashboard I realised that the > watch file of netlib-java and libmtj-java became disfunctional and when > tracking down the issue I noticed that both projects moved from SF to > Github. While I updated th

Bug#747027: emma does not work with Java 7 bytecode

tags 747027 wontfix upstream severity 747027 normal thanks This is a limitation of the upstream software, but the software does function. Therefore, I am reducing the severity. Due to the popularity of the emma-coverage package [0], I don't think it's in our users' best interests to request remo

Bug#759899: elasticsearch: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: liblucene4-java

block 759899 by 736644 thanks On 08/30/2014 02:06 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Source: elasticsearch > Version: 1.0.3+dfsg-2 > Severity: serious > Tags: jessie sid > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs > Justification: FTBFS on amd64 >> The following packages ha

Bug#759736: elasticsearch: CVE-2014-3120

On 09/01/2014 01:05 AM, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) wrote: > On 30/08/14 5:37 AM, "Salvatore Bonaccorso" wrote: > >> Source: elasticsearch >> Severity: grave >> Tags: security upstream fixed-upstream >> >> Hi Hilko, >> >> I see elasticsearch entered unstable now. Some time ago the following >> v

Bug#760057: commons-math3: FTBFS - test KohonenUpdateActionTest fails

On 08/31/2014 04:07 AM, Michael Tautschnig wrote: > Package: commons-math3 > Version: 3.3-1 > Severity: serious > Usertags: goto-cc > > During a rebuild of all Debian packages in a clean sid chroot (using > cowbuilder > and pbuilder) the build failed with the following error. > > [...] > Results

Bug#753470: libspring-java: CVE-2014-0225

11 @@ +libspring-java (3.0.6.RELEASE-6+deb7u4) wheezy-security; urgency=high + + * Team upload. + * Add patch for CVE-2014-0225. (Closes: #753470) + - Thanks to Stephen Nelson. + + -- tony mancill Fri, 05 Sep 2014 22:47:07 -0700 + libspring-java (3.0.6.RELEASE-6+deb7u3) wheezy-security; urg

Bug#753470: libspring-java: CVE-2014-0225

On 09/06/2014 11:36 AM, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hi Tony, > > On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 08:50:24AM -0700, tony mancill wrote: >> On Wed, 02 Jul 2014 10:36:55 +0200 Moritz Muehlenhoff >> wrote: >>> Package: libspring-java >>> Severity: grave >>>

Bug#760888: src:java-gnome: FTBFS on armhf: './doc/api/': No such file or directory

On 09/08/2014 02:43 PM, Adam Borowski wrote: > Package: src:java-gnome > Version: 4.1.3-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) > > Hi! > During an archive rebuild on armhf, your package failed to build, despite > multiple retries. It

Bug#760877: jackson-annotations: diff for NMU version 2.4.2-1.1

On 09/09/2014 10:45 AM, Gilles Filippini wrote: > tags 760877 + pending > thanks > > Dear maintainer, > > I've prepared an NMU for jackson-annotations (versioned as 2.4.2-1.1) and > uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I > should delay it longer. Hi Timo, I dcut the NMU and

Bug#759526: New upstream version fixes CVE-2014-3604

On 09/09/2014 09:27 AM, Matthew Vernon wrote: > Hi, > > Upstream have released 0.3.15, which fixes this bug. I’m still away (and will > be for a while yet); would one of the java team mind uploading 0.3.15, > please? Hopefully it’ll just drop in on top of the existing packaging… > > Thanks, >

Bug#761269: FTBFS: requires 'apt' annotation processing tool from JDK <= 6

On 09/12/2014 02:14 AM, Simon McVittie wrote: > Source: lwjgl > Version: 2.7.1+dfsg-3 > Severity: serious > Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) > Forwarded: https://github.com/LWJGL/lwjgl/issues/6 > > While attempting to fix lwjgl's other FTBFS by removin

Bug#761305: RM: leiningen -- obsolete

Control: severity -1 normal Control: retitle -1 RM: leiningen: RoM; obsolete; request from upstream Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org thanks On 09/12/2014 11:22 AM, Phil Hagelberg wrote: > Subject: RM: leiningen -- obsolete > Package: leiningen > Severity: important > > Dear Maintainer, > > A

Bug#764017: closure-compiler: java.lang.RuntimeException when run on architectures with gcj instead of openjdk (hurd-i386, kfreebsd-any, sparc)

On 10/04/2014 02:00 PM, Johannes Schauer wrote: > Package: closure-compiler > Version: 20130227+dfsg1-6 > Severity: important > > Hi, > > suppose, the file "out.js" is empty then the following will happen on > architectures without openjdk but gcj (hurd-i386, kfreebsd-any, sparc): > > $ closure-

Bug#764017: closure-compiler: java.lang.RuntimeException when run on architectures with gcj instead of openjdk (hurd-i386, kfreebsd-any, sparc)

On 10/05/2014 10:08 AM, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > Hello, > > tony mancill wrote: >> Thank you for filing the bug report. At this point (for jessie), I >> think we should prune the supported arch list to only those platforms >> with openjdk. > > kfreebsd

Bug#755468: closure-compiler: compilation with closure-compiler requires some *-extern.js files

Hi Dominique, Where can those extern files found? I don't see them in upstream tarball for the current closure-compiler in Debian, nor in the latest upstream. Thanks, tony signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team

Bug#763943: libphonenumber: FTBFS on arm64

On 10/03/2014 06:18 PM, Wookey wrote: > Package: libphonenumber > Version: 6.3~svn698-3 > Severity: normal > Tags: patch > User: debian-...@lists.debian.org > Usertag: arm64 > > > This package failed to build on arm64. Build log: > http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libphonenumbe

Bug#761269: FTBFS: requires 'apt' annotation processing tool from JDK <= 6

On 10/10/2014 06:06 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Restoring the apt binary in the openjdk-7-jdk package should fix this > issue. It was removed in openjdk-7/7u65-2.5.1-5 but it's still available > upstream. > > This issue will come back with the Java 8 transition. Yeah, my thought was that we could

Bug#765563: closure-compiler: does not work when there are spaces in the path/name of the JavaScript file

On 10/16/2014 02:39 AM, Eerste Laatste wrote: > Package: closure-compiler > Version: 20130227+dfsg1-6 > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainer, > > Using closure-compiler fails when there are spaces in the path/name of a > JavaScript file even when specifying them like: > > "/path name with spaces

Bug#765563: closure-compiler: does not work when there are spaces in the path/name of the JavaScript file

On 10/17/2014 01:58 AM, Eerste Laatste wrote: > Tony, it works for me with the double quotes added as shown below: > -- > #!/bin/sh > > . /usr/lib/java-wrappers/java-wrappers.sh > > MAIN=com.google.javascript.jscomp.CommandLineRunner > J

Bug#759947: nmu for jruby

On 11/01/2014 06:21 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote: > control: tag -1 patch, pending > > Hi I've uploaded an nmu to delayed/5 fixing this issue. Please let me > know if I should delay longer. Hi Mike, thanks for working on this. It seems kind of ugly to make this build-dep on a specific version of

Bug#767322: java-gnome: FTBFS for ppc64el

On 10/29/2014 11:34 PM, Brahadambal Srinivasan wrote: > Source: java-gnome > Version: 4.1.3-3 > Severity: normal > Tags: patch > X-Debbugs-Cc: bren...@br.ibm.com > User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: ppc64el Hello Brahadambal, Thank you for the patch. I tested it on a porterbox and

Bug#726389: commons-daemon: diff for NMU version 1.0.15-5.2

On 11/06/2014 04:08 AM, Colin Watson wrote: > Control: tag -1 pending > > Dear maintainer, > > I've prepared an NMU for commons-daemon (versioned as 1.0.15-5.2) and > uploaded it to DELAYED/10. Please feel free to tell me if I should > delay it longer. > > I took the liberty of including a very

Bug#768835: FTBFS: "Could not add file '.../JavadocFixTool.class' to ZIP"

On 11/09/2014 07:39 AM, Adam Borowski wrote: > Package: src:groovy2 > Version: 2.2.2+dfsg-3 > Severity: serious > Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) > > Hi! > I'm afraid that during a rebuild of jessie on armhf your package failed to > build: Hi Adam,

Bug#726389: commons-daemon: diff for NMU version 1.0.15-5.2

On 11/06/2014 04:08 AM, Colin Watson wrote: > Control: tag -1 pending > > Dear maintainer, > > I've prepared an NMU for commons-daemon (versioned as 1.0.15-5.2) and > uploaded it to DELAYED/10. Please feel free to tell me if I should > delay it longer. A maintainer upload incorporating these ch

Bug#769804: jarjar-maven-plugin: FTBFS against rebuilt packages: Failed to resolve artifact ant

On 11/16/2014 09:53 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > As I understand ant is pulled through > maven-debian-helper->velocity->ant. How did you manage to install the > build dependencies without ant installed? > > Ant is a direct dependency so it would be a good idea to add it to the > bui

Bug#769693: Please giveback libjogl2-java

On 11/15/2014 03:20 PM, gregor herrmann wrote: > Control: retitle -1 libjogl2-java: FTBFS on arm64 > > On Sat, 15 Nov 2014 18:44:05 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: > >> libjogl2-java failed to build on arm64, ppc64el, and s390x because of >> a bug in gluegen2 (#769003) which should be fixed in 2.2.

Bug#769301: java3d: FTBFS error: unknown type name 'GLintptr'

On 11/22/2014 03:34 PM, Markus Koschany wrote: > tags 769301 patch > severity 765933 important > thanks > > On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 16:57:45 +0100 Markus Koschany wrote: > [...] >> apparently bug #765933 in mesa causes a FTBFS in java3d. I think this is >> a regression and easier to fix in mesa itsel

Re: tomcat6 wheezy DSA (was/and Re: tomcat6_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_amd64.changes REJECTED

On 11/23/2014 04:16 AM, Mark Hymers wrote: > On Sun, 23, Nov, 2014 at 10:29:59AM +0100, Holger Levsen spoke thus.. >> Hi, >> >> On Sonntag, 23. November 2014, Debian FTP Masters wrote: >>> Version check failed: >>> Your upload included the source package tomcat6, version 6.0.41-2+squeeze5, >>> howe

Re: tomcat6 wheezy DSA (was/and Re: tomcat6_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_amd64.changes REJECTED

On 11/23/2014 12:03 PM, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi Adam, > > On Sonntag, 23. November 2014, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> On Sun, 2014-11-23 at 19:43 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: >>> oh, "btw": jessie has -2, sid -3, with changes unsuitable for wheezy and >>> targeted at jessie. this needs an unblock re

Bug#770744: javamail: FTBFS under pbuilder with USENETWORK=no: Test failure

On 11/23/2014 11:02 AM, Daniel Schepler wrote: > Source: javamail > Version: 1.5.2-3 > Severity: important [snip] > Failed tests: test(com.sun.mail.smtp.SMTPWriteTimeoutTest): No exception I have mixed feelings about these sorts of failures. I understand the need to build in a non-networked en

Re: tomcat6 wheezy DSA (was/and Re: tomcat6_6.0.41-2+squeeze5_amd64.changes REJECTED

On 11/23/2014 01:16 PM, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi Tony, > > On Sonntag, 23. November 2014, tony mancill wrote: >> The cruft report for unstable will look *very* different due to 6.0.41-3 >> being a *radically* different package. > > no, the report exactly looks

Bug#770441: androidsdk-tools: Vcs-* fields do not point to a valid repository

On 11/21/2014 01:35 AM, James Cowgill wrote: > Source: androidsdk-tools > Version: 22.2+git20130830~92d25d6-1 > Severity: minor > > Hi, > > Currently the Vcs fields of this package point to: > git://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-java/androidsdk-tools.git > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-java/

Bug#770744: javamail: FTBFS under pbuilder with USENETWORK=no: Test failure

On 11/23/2014 02:03 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 23/11/2014 22:20, tony mancill a écrit : > >> Emmanuel, any concerns with an upload to disable this test? > > I share the same feelings and I think this kind of failure should be > ignored. My only concern is that we weaken

Bug#770780: Apache ActiveMQ Packaged with Old XStream Library

On 11/23/2014 04:54 PM, Georgi Geshev wrote: > Package: activemq > Version: 5.6.0+dfsg-1 > > Apache ActiveMQ as packaged for Debian seems to ship with an old XStream > (1.4.2) library[1][2] which allows for instantiating arbitrary classes. > This could be leveraged for system command execution as

Re: [SECURITY] [DLA 91-1] tomcat6 security update

On 11/24/2014 03:05 AM, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi Hubert, > > On Montag, 24. November 2014, H B wrote: >> After removing the % in the $JAVA_OPTS the upgrade process finishes >> correctly. Mea culpa :-/ > > I don't think it's your fault at all, rather a bug in the package. Just not a > bug which

Bug#770911: tomcat7: postinst fails when JAVA_OPTS contains '%'

Package: tomcat7 Severity: normal The sed commands in the postinst use % as the separator, which may cause a failure if JAVA_OPTS contains this character. This bug report is a reminder to the maintainers to consider using a different separator. Thanks, tony __ This is the maintainer address of

Bug#771342: jnr-x86asm: please package newer upstream version 1.0.2

Package: jnr-x86asm Version: 0.1-1 Severity: wishlist Filing an reminder/tracking bug to get jnr-x86asm updated in order to support updated jruby packaging. Cheers, tony __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team

Bug#771342: jnr-x86asm: please package newer upstream version 1.0.2

On 11/28/2014 08:55 AM, tony mancill wrote: > Package: jnr-x86asm > Version: 0.1-1 > Severity: wishlist Version 1.0.2 has been uploaded to experimental. I believe it is also appropriate for unstable once we're satisfied that it won't negatively impact the freeze. I was

Bug#770744: javamail: FTBFS under pbuilder with USENETWORK=no: Test failure

On 11/23/2014 06:44 PM, tony mancill wrote: > On 11/23/2014 02:03 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: >> Le 23/11/2014 22:20, tony mancill a écrit : >> >>> Emmanuel, any concerns with an upload to disable this test? >> >> I share the same feelings and I think this kind

Bug#771537: freeplane: should relax to depend on default-jre | java-runtime

retitle 771537 "freeplane: should relax to depend on default-jre | java6-runtime" thanks On 11/30/2014 06:57 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Source: freeplane > Version: 1.3.12-1 > Severity: normal > > Freeplane package depends on default-jre. That means I am forced to > install the default java,

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >