Am 25.04.2010 19:18, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
dh7 is not a successor for CDBS.
No, but IMHO it is easier to read.
I am also in favour of dh7 and dpkg-source 3.0 format, btw.
Cheers,
Fabian
___
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia
Am 24.04.2010 14:03, schrieb Archive Administrator:
Reject Reasons:
mplayer_1.0~rc3+svn20090426-2_amd64.changes file already known to dak
WTF?!
--
Dipl.-Phys. Fabian Greffrath
Ruhr-Universität Bochum
Lehrstuhl für Energieanlagen und Energieprozesstechnik (LEAT)
Universitätsstr. 150, IB 3/134
severity 578500 wishlist
thanks
Am 20.04.2010 12:21, schrieb Gilles Dartiguelongue:
There are multiple ways of using ffmpeg without X so it would be nice to either
have:
* a ffmpeg-nox package
* or a ffplay package (which seems to be the only util using X related
* libraries)
demo
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 09:32:04AM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am 25.04.2010 19:18, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
dh7 is not a successor for CDBS.
No, but IMHO it is easier to read.
I do understand that some find short-form dh7 easier to read than CDBS.
But is that enough reason for making i
Am 26.04.2010 09:39, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
I do understand that some find short-form dh7 easier to read than CDBS.
It's just a matter of taste. Before dh7 was introduced I was also in
favour of CDBS, but the new override_* rules really got me. ;)
But is that enough reason for making it
So, can you confirm the attached patch fixes this issue?
- Fabian
--- flac-1.2.1.orig/src/libFLAC/libFLAC.m4
+++ flac-1.2.1/src/libFLAC/libFLAC.m4
@@ -14,14 +14,18 @@ AC_ARG_WITH(libFLAC-includes,[ --with-l
AC_ARG_ENABLE(libFLACtest, [ --disable-libFLACtest Do not try to compile and ru
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 09:48:41 (CEST), Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am 26.04.2010 09:39, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
>> I do understand that some find short-form dh7 easier to read than CDBS.
>
> It's just a matter of taste. Before dh7 was introduced I was also in
> favour of CDBS, but the new overri
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 09:32:17 (CEST), Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am 24.04.2010 14:03, schrieb Archive Administrator:
>> Reject Reasons:
>> mplayer_1.0~rc3+svn20090426-2_amd64.changes file already known to dak
>
> WTF?!
Stefano asked me to do another mplayer upload that does not require to
go vi
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 12:21:07PM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
It seems that cdbs allows Jonas to be very productive, which is a great
benefit for the packages he is working on. I just hope that his style
of work doesn't mean that no one else but Jonas touches the package
anymore.
Is it r
packaging is currently on git.debian.org
http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/dvbcut.git;a=summary
But I currently don't have the time (and interest) to finally upload it
to debian. It seems that an ubuntu user called 'bojo42' has updated the
packaging in his PPA:
https://launchpad.net/~bojo
Am 26.04.2010 13:01, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
Is it really fair to draw an image of me against the World?
I seem to recall others happy to use CDBS as well. Just not strongly
agitating about it, as I am.
Erm, I have understood Reinhard speaking *for* you, not against you!
But to be honest, i
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 12:22:14 (CEST), Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 09:32:17 (CEST), Fabian Greffrath wrote:
>
>> Am 24.04.2010 14:03, schrieb Archive Administrator:
>>> Reject Reasons:
>>> mplayer_1.0~rc3+svn20090426-2_amd64.changes file already known to dak
>>
>> WTF?!
>
>
Source: jack-audio-connection-kit
Version: 1.9.5~dfsg-2
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> sbuild (Debian sbuild) 0.60.0 (23 Feb 2010) on lxdebian.bfinv.de
[...]
> Linux detected
> Checking for program g++,c++ : ok /usr/bin/g++
> Checking
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 01:05:33PM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am 26.04.2010 13:01, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
Is it really fair to draw an image of me against the World?
I seem to recall others happy to use CDBS as well. Just not strongly
agitating about it, as I am.
Erm, I have understood
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 13:05:33 (CEST), Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am 26.04.2010 13:01, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
>> Is it really fair to draw an image of me against the World?
>>
>> I seem to recall others happy to use CDBS as well. Just not strongly
>> agitating about it, as I am.
>
> Erm, I hav
Am 26.04.2010 14:43, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
What "you" - singular or plural?
Did you somehow read it as speaking for all those interested in
CDBS?
It was a personal singular "you", although I actually never meant to
become personal at all, sorry. I think my second sentence somehow
clarifie
Hi Jonas,
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I notice, though, that above links only mention API, not ABI. Is it safe to
expect library ABI (runtime linkage) to be frozen too if its API (compile
time interface) is?
I'm sure that the answer is "yes," but I've asked the
upstream d
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I notice, though, that above links only mention API, not ABI. Is it safe to
expect library ABI (runtime linkage) to be frozen too if its API (compile
time interface) is?
Answer from upstream:
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 09:34:26 -0400
From: Paul Dav
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 03:05:18PM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Am 26.04.2010 14:43, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
I seem to recall others happy to use CDBS as well.
Yes, of course. CDBS is widely used and accepted.
What I meant to say was that I seem to recall other _in_this_team_ happy
to
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 08:29:40AM -0500, Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote:
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I notice, though, that above links only mention API, not ABI. Is it
safe to expect library ABI (runtime linkage) to be frozen too if its
API (compile time interface) is?
I'm
Am 26.04.2010 16:16, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
What I meant to say was that I seem to recall other _in_this_team_ happy
to use CDBS as well. As Reinhard pointed out too.
Alright.
What I questioned was a wording by Benjamin Drung that could only (to
me) be interpreted as "in this team we are p
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Gabriel M. Beddingfield
wrote:
ABI back-compatibility has never been assured - if a program was
linked against JACK API M.N.m and the runtime installation is a
version earlier than that, there may be problems as you noted. the
new rules on weak symbols post t
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Gabriel M. Beddingfield
wrote:
ABI back-compatibility has never been assured - if a program was linked
against JACK API M.N.m and the runtime installation is a version earlier
than that, there may be problems as
Am Montag, den 26.04.2010, 16:16 +0200 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 03:05:18PM +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> >Am 26.04.2010 14:43, schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
>
> >>I seem to recall others happy to use CDBS as well.
> >
> >Yes, of course. CDBS is widely used and accepted.
>
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 04:45:43PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
We could either recommend dh7 or document the packaging patterns
described below by Jonas.
What I would find the most helpful was to document main patterns of
our actual packaging work: This would serve both as technical
introd
Hi!
Il 25/04/2010 17.33, Jonas Smedegaard ha scritto:
> jack-audio-connection-kit (1.9.5~dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=low
> .
>[ Jonas Smedegaard ]
>* Use system waf. Build-depend on waf.
>- Strip binary waf file (too risky to blindly invoke, and too much
> hassle unpacking
FYI: The status of the gmusicbrowser source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.0.2-1
Current version: 1.0.2-2
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will r
Hi Luca,
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 05:52:34PM +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote:
Il 25/04/2010 17.33, Jonas Smedegaard ha scritto:
jack-audio-connection-kit (1.9.5~dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
[ Jonas Smedegaard ]
* Use system waf. Build-depend on waf.
- Strip binary waf file (too ris
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 01:16, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Our JACK packaging has now contains jackd2 (no longer jackd1).
>
> Upstream has promised a frozen library API[1] equal to that of jackd1
> 0.116.2, and both shlibs file and symbols[2] file reflect that.
>
> The library packages no lo
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 01:20:16PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 01:16, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Hi,
Our JACK packaging has now contains jackd2 (no longer jackd1).
Upstream has promised a frozen library API[1] equal to that of jackd1
0.116.2, and both shlibs file and sym
Am Montag, den 26.04.2010, 17:45 +0200 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
> >Do we wrap lists in debian/control (for example, Build-Depends)?
>
> It is new to me - I had seen it before but you guys made me reflect on
> it and have now made CDBS do it by default. In other words: I love it!
>
> I do not l
Il giorno Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:39:40 +0200
Jonas Smedegaard ha scritto:
> I want to, just haven't figured out yet a way to use the shipped waf in
> a way that I can trust: I really do not want to blindly execute an
> upstream-shipped binary chunk. yes, I am aware that it is not really a
> bina
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 08:16:29PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Am Montag, den 26.04.2010, 17:45 +0200 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
>Do we wrap lists in debian/control (for example, Build-Depends)?
It is new to me - I had seen it before but you guys made me reflect
on it and have now made CDBS do
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 08:37:07PM +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote:
Il giorno Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:39:40 +0200
Jonas Smedegaard ha scritto:
I want to, just haven't figured out yet a way to use the shipped waf
in a way that I can trust: I really do not want to blindly execute an
upstream-shipped bi
[sent again, cc Luca this time]
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 08:37:07PM +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote:
Il giorno Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:39:40 +0200
Jonas Smedegaard ha scritto:
I want to, just haven't figured out yet a way to use the shipped waf
in a way that I can trust: I really do not want to blindl
jack-audio-connection-kit_1.9.5~dfsg-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
jack-audio-connection-kit_1.9.5~dfsg-3.dsc
jack-audio-connection-kit_1.9.5~dfsg-3.debian.tar.gz
jackd_1.9.5~dfsg-3_amd64.deb
libjack0_1.9.5~dfsg-3_amd64.deb
jackd-firewire_1.9.5~
Accepted:
jack-audio-connection-kit_1.9.5~dfsg-3.debian.tar.gz
to
main/j/jack-audio-connection-kit/jack-audio-connection-kit_1.9.5~dfsg-3.debian.tar.gz
jack-audio-connection-kit_1.9.5~dfsg-3.dsc
to main/j/jack-audio-connection-kit/jack-audio-connection-kit_1.9.5~dfsg-3.dsc
jackd-firewire_1.
Your message dated Mon, 26 Apr 2010 19:36:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#579237: fixed in jack-audio-connection-kit 1.9.5~dfsg-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #579237,
regarding jack-audio-connection-kit - FTBFS: error: FFADO driver was explicitly
requested but cannot be built
t
Am Montag, den 26.04.2010, 20:51 +0200 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 08:16:29PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> >Am Montag, den 26.04.2010, 17:45 +0200 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
> >> >Do we wrap lists in debian/control (for example, Build-Depends)?
> >>
> >> It is new to me - I
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 10:57:43PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Am Montag, den 26.04.2010, 20:51 +0200 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 08:16:29PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
>Am Montag, den 26.04.2010, 17:45 +0200 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
>> >Do we wrap lists in debian/contro
Am Montag, den 26.04.2010, 23:16 +0200 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 10:57:43PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> >Am Montag, den 26.04.2010, 20:51 +0200 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
> >> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 08:16:29PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> >> >Am Montag, den 26.04.2010
Il giorno Mon, 26 Apr 2010 20:57:44 +0200
Jonas Smedegaard ha scritto:
> A patch would be awesome!
Here it is: http://people.debian.org/~dktrkranz/local_waf.patch
I tested it and package built. I didn't test if resulting binaries are
sane, and the same applies to the build log itself.
Keep in m
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:44:49PM +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote:
Il giorno Mon, 26 Apr 2010 20:57:44 +0200
Jonas Smedegaard ha scritto:
A patch would be awesome!
Here it is: http://people.debian.org/~dktrkranz/local_waf.patch
I tested it and package built. I didn't test if resulting binaries
Package: mediatomb
Version: 0.12.0~svn2018-6
Severity: wishlist
0.12.1 has been released the 8th APril.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.33.3 (SMP w/2 CPU
I don't like long indentations, too.
IMHO, single space indentation and `comma + \n + single_space`
wrapping-style increase readability.
--
Alessio Treglia
Ubuntu MOTU Developer | Homepage: http://www.alessiotreglia.com
0FEC 59A5 E18E E04F 6D40 593B 45D4 8C7C DCFC 3FD0
___
hi9
Dear friends,
I'm sorry, wasted your valuable time, we are chinese a major
international trading electronics
wholesale company.
Our company's electronic products have the best quality, cheapest price
and best service.
If you have time to buy 5 products that can free you of the pos
46 matches
Mail list logo