Is response empty in network sniffer/web inspector? Or in javascript code?
The response is already empty in web inspector.
Very bad
You should check if it is actually written to HTTP response (maybe
response is already flushed).
If I return some HTML in addition to my base64 string
I checked the response header and it's
Content-Type:
text/html; charset=UTF-8.
Unfortunately I couldn't check the response because it's empty.
Is response empty in network sniffer/web inspector? Or in javascript code?
Printing the return-part in my controller I got the correct
Dear Victor,
Am Mittwoch, 15. August 2012 11:47:25 UTC+2 schrieb Victor:
I checked the response header and it's
Content-Type:
text/html; charset=UTF-8.
Unfortunately I couldn't check the response because it's empty.
Is response empty in network sniffer/web inspector? Or in javascript
Dear Victor,
thanks for your reply. I checked the response header and it's
Content-Type:
text/html; charset=UTF-8.
Unfortunately I couldn't check the response because it's empty. Printing
the return-part in my controller
I got the correct base64-encoded string. I checked prototype api docs and
Additional info: when I print out the response to console I only receive:
*img src='data:image/jpeg;base64,' width='262'/*
So my base64-encoded string is cutted out. When calling
my reloadurl directly in the browser the image shows up correctly.
Any further suggestions to this?
regards
mabei
Hi,
It's T.J., not J.
i want convert requestObject in JSON string and send to the server.
var jsonRequest =
encodeURIComponent(JSON.stringify(requestObject));
new Ajax.Request(baseUrl + '/usermsg/index/sendmessage', {
method: 'POST',
requestHeaders:
Hi T.J. Crowder,
var jsonRequest = JSON.stringify(requestObject);
new Ajax.Request(baseUrl + '/usermsg/index/sendmessage', {
method: 'POST',
requestHeaders: {Accept: 'application/json'},
parameters: {json: jsonRequest},
// ...
In PHP:
$request = $this-getRequest();
On Nov 11, 2010, at 8:20 AM, fashionpeople wrote:
Hi T.J. Crowder,
var jsonRequest = JSON.stringify(requestObject);
new Ajax.Request(baseUrl + '/usermsg/index/sendmessage', {
method: 'POST',
requestHeaders: {Accept: 'application/json'},
parameters: {json: jsonRequest},
// ...
In
Hi T.J. Crowder,
Now works with your suggests. Thanks a lot.
The ajax request look like doesn't work, because callback parse, it
did call another ajax request not fixed with your suggets.
Thanks.
On 11 Nov, 15:43, Walter Lee Davis wa...@wdstudio.com wrote:
On Nov 11, 2010, at 8:20 AM,
Hi,
I tried use fixedEncodeURI like suggest in your links.
I've never even heard of fixedEncodeURI.
People are taking the time to help you here, it's worth taking the
time to carefully *read* what people have written and try the things
they suggest (or not, of course, it's up to you).
This is
It may be helping if you could trace and post here the following
things :
From Javascript:
- requestObject
- JSON.stringify(requestObject)
From PHP:
- $this-getRequest()-getRawBody();
- rawurldecode($this-getRequest()-getRawBody());
Also, why do you need to use JSON.stringify thing when, as T.J.
J. Crowder do not get me wrong, I thank you for the effort they put in
helping others.
i readed about your suggest to send data in this simple way:
var jsonRequest = ...;
new Ajax.Request( // ...
parameters: {json: jsonRequest}
// ...
});
but my question is, i have
Hi,
I replaced escape with encodeURI. But decoding fails again.
function sendMessage(baseUrl, idNickRcv, msg) {
var requestObject = new Object();
requestObject.idNickRcv = idNickRcv;
requestObject.msg = msg;
var jsonRequest =
Hi,
I replaced escape with encodeURI. But decoding fails again.
Well, did you try actually doing what I suggested?
-- T.J.
On Nov 9, 4:07 pm, fashionpeople fashionpeople.busin...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I replaced escape with encodeURI. But decoding fails again.
function
Hi,
I replaced escape with encodeURI. But decoding fails again.
function sendMessage(baseUrl, idNickRcv, msg) {
var requestObject = new Object();
requestObject.idNickRcv = idNickRcv;
requestObject.msg = msg;
var jsonRequest =
I tried use fixedEncodeURI like suggest in your links.
But doesn't work.
I didn't understand the problem.
On 9 Nov, 17:25, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
I replaced escape with encodeURI. But decoding fails again.
Well, did you try actually doing what I suggested?
--
Hi,
I don't know that it's the problem because I'm not a PHP person, but
you're using the `escape` function to encode your parameters, and then
decoding them with a PHP function called `urldecode`. JavaScript's
`escape` function does _not_ URL-encode things, it does something
similar but
Right. The best low-level way to translate JS to PHP and back again is
using encodeURI or uncodeURIComponent on your JS side, and
rawurldecode() or rawurlencode() on the PHP side. They are
functionally identical, as long as you have set your PHP side to use
UTF-8 as its default charset.
T.J., I was surprised too that the DB would have time to get an update
before the page is unloaded, but I had a closer look at the
example :o)
If the links urls are downloadable file types like the .exe of the
example, the browser will not unload the current page, and the Ajax
request will
Your method seems really random. You should proceed differently.
Imagine the user has JS disabled, it's click won't be logged, you
should use a server side script that will log the click and redirect
the user to the desired file : href=dispatcher.php?file=program.exe
If you don't have access to
Hi,
By default, Ajax.Request is *asynchronous*. I'm surprised, frankly,
that you're seeing many database updates at all, regardless of the
browser, since a request may not have been transmitted before the page
gets torn down to make way for the new one. I wouldn't expect it to be
reliable.
If
Well thanks for the help on posting a request to the iframe to handle
the PDF. Here is my bigger problem and the reason for my original
thought: how do you trigger code on completion of the PDF load in the
iframe? Of course the original thought was to make an ajax request and
and write the results
Generate a form with the necessary values in the iFrame and submit the
form. That's all I can think off right now.
On 09 Feb 2010, at 01:03, kstubs wrote:
It must be a post to the server, not a get.
On Feb 8, 4:22 pm, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
Is this possible?
Hi,
It must be a post to the server, not a get.
Okay, that's a *few* more lines of code:
var markup, form;
markup =
form id='___unique_form_id___' +
method='POST' +
action='yoururl' +
target='theIFrameName' +
style='display:
Blast (I *hate* double posting), forgot to say: By theIFrameName in
that code I mean literally the value of a `name` attribute on the
`iframe` tag (*name*, not *id*).
-- T.J. :-)
On Feb 9, 3:05 pm, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
It must be a post to the server, not a get.
Hi,
Is this possible?
Possible? It's downright easy:
$('idOfIFrame').src = pathToYourServerScript.xyz;
Very important that your server script set the correct content type,
of course.
I use something similar with a frame (not an iframe), but the concept
should be transferrable.
HTH,
--
It must be a post to the server, not a get.
On Feb 8, 4:22 pm, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
Is this possible?
Possible? It's downright easy:
$('idOfIFrame').src = pathToYourServerScript.xyz;
Very important that your server script set the correct content type,
of
Could be the web server ...
Alot of web servers have a max number of paralell requests per user
Alex Mcauley
http://www.thevacancymarket.com
- Original Message -
From: ziva znibers...@gmail.com
To: Prototype script.aculo.us prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday,
Hi,
Nearly identical questions at almost the same time. :-)
Here's the other one, where I've posted an answer:
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous/browse_thread/thread/6af62cd45d76f06e
HTH,
--
T.J. Crowder
Independent Software Consultant
tj / crowder software / com
: [Proto-Scripty] Re: ajax request
Hi,
Nearly identical questions at almost the same time. :-)
Here's the other one, where I've posted an answer:
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous/browse_thread/thread/6af62cd45d76f06e
HTH,
--
T.J. Crowder
Independent Software Consultant
tj
@Matt Foster: your patch didn't work for me ??
in ff i didn't get the onTimeout event or if you get then it
happend when the server is back online
an the as often as it should happend while the offline time.
i don't know why?
i use an PeriodicalExecuter for my ajax request ...
that's
hi
But leaving aside status 0, just a logical point. The third condition
in your updated code:
return (status = 200 status 300 status != 0);
...is irrelevant and will never be evaluated. If 200 = x 300, x
cannot be zero.
i can't believe what piece rubbish of code i
Hey Rick,
My proposed idea in that article requires you to actually
redefine the Ajax.Request. If we can solidify the idea we could
submit the code as a patch to core but as of now you've gotta either
replace it in the source library itself or just redefine it after the
library but before
Yeah I discuss the idea of having its own event for timing out in my
article. The argument is a timeout is a failure, its failed to
retrieve a response in the given time. So a timeout is basically like
an inherited event from onFailure. Question remains do you seperate
the event or just add a
Hi,
thx a lot for your help.
@Colin
doesn't work means it returns NULL ;)
But of course, you are right.
I already feared that the A string is not a document/DOM is the main
problem.
@T.J. Crowder
thx! I'll try this soon, it looks promising :)
I already created a regEx solution but it's too
: [Proto-Scripty] Re: AJAX request - select element
Hi,
thx a lot for your help.
@Colin
doesn't work means it returns NULL ;)
But of course, you are right.
I already feared that the A string is not a document/DOM is the main
problem.
@T.J. Crowder
thx! I'll try this soon, it looks promising
On Jun 15, 1:41 pm, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote:
2. Alternately, use a document fragment[1][2]. This is to a large
extent what document fragments are for -- holding copies of things and
mucking about with them off-to-the-side. I was surprised not to have
an example lying
Hi,
As Colin points out, you're trying to treat a String object like a
Document (by calling getElementById), which isn't going to work.
You have a couple of options.
1. Use string parsing to isolate the markup in that string for the
element you want. Once you have just that markup, you can
Hi,
You're running into something called the Same Origin Policy, details
here.[1] Basically, you can't use the XmlHttpRequest object to
request resources from a different origin than the page in which the
script is running, and origin includes the port.
[1]
Is there a reason why you are using complete URLs in your call?
var categoriesInitUrl = 'http://www.tonerize.com/catalog/picker/categories/'
;
You might get better mileage by making these relative URLs.
var categoriesInitUrl = '/catalog/picker/categories/';
Walter
On Apr 7, 2009, at 10:52
Hi,
However on some computers the request is never even sent, and we can't
figure out why.
Have you eliminated things like what brand of browser they're using,
etc.?
Walter's point about the URL well-taken, and I see that you've already
fixed it for the bit he mentioned. That's a good idea,
Wow you were right that was exactly the issue. I know you can't use
Ajax cross-domain but I had no idea that putting in the full URL would
cause problems. It was also very strange because it only happened on
certain computers / browsers.
Regardless, thanks so much for your help!
On Apr 7, 1:27
Hi,
Sorry, sent too soon. When I said aren't the same thing, I mean in
terms of the Same Origin Policy[1].
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Same_origin_policy
HTH,
-- T.J.
On Apr 7, 7:00 pm, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
However on some computers the request is never
TJ, thanks for you indepth reply and the link to the Wiki post. Point
well taken from both you and Walter. One thing I will definitely do
before anything else is redirect tonerize.com to www.tonerize.com, so
that I can alleviate any of these issues before I make all of the
calls relative!
Thanks
If you read the Prototype documentation, you will see that Prototype
uses UTF-8 internally, and if you read the W3C recommendations, you
will see that UTF-8 is the preferred and expected encoding for Web
sites.
So what is your issue specifically? Are you unable to set your server
to
Hi Baglan,
I'm already doing that. However, in the server I must convert from one
charset to another programmaticaly.
The problem seems to be the use of encodeURIComponent function by
prototype:
Mozilla Developer Core Javascript
(I'm resending my last message in plain text after viewing it on
google groups, which is in html and with formatting errors)
Hi Baglan,
I'm already doing that. However, in the server I must convert from one
charset to another programmaticaly.
The problem seems to be the use of
47 matches
Mail list logo
