On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 at 22:36:03, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Darren Branagh wrote:
Completely off topic - and I'll probably get flamed to death for it,
but..
Is he [Freddy] still mad into cars?
Cars were not discussed...I was only on the phone for about 2 hours
IIRC ;-)
And
Dilwyn,
sorry, this one bounced back.
You asked if I still had all the stuff I was working on for Freddy. The answer
is no as I sent it all back many years ago when I stopped working on it.
I've no idea if Freddy ever got it as he had 'vanished' from the planet (it
appeared) and I never heard
Completely off topic - and I'll probably get flamed to death for it, but..
Is he still mad into cars?
And whats he doing for a living? Still accountancy?
Does he still eat enough to fuel a small African country?
Darren.
-Original Message-
From: Dilwyn Jones [mailto:[EMAIL
sorry, this one bounced back.
You asked if I still had all the stuff I was working on for Freddy.
The answer is no as I sent it all back many years ago when I stopped
working on it.
I've no idea if Freddy ever got it as he had 'vanished' from the
planet (it appeared) and I never heard from him
Darren Branagh wrote:
Completely off topic - and I'll probably get flamed to death for it,
but..
Is he [Freddy] still mad into cars?
Cars were not discussed...I was only on the phone for about 2 hours
IIRC ;-)
And whats he doing for a living? Still accountancy?
Yes, but a fairly specialised
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... but at least Freddy was paying and it
was worth it to have a nice long chat with him again!
As far as I remember from my own dealings with Freddy, many years ago, there
was no other choice but to have a long chat - he could talk for hours, and
remain on topic
As far as I remember from my own dealings with Freddy, many years ago, there
was no other choice but to have a long chat - he could talk for hours, and
remain on topic too.
;-)
I used to do some work for him - which never came to fruition as he vanished
before it was complete -
I can confirm that my changes to Pefection are compatability changes ie bigger
screensand greater compatibility with SMSQE and qdos on the amiga. I have not
added any new functionality or changed the basic mother daughter job way of
running the program. I am willing to submit my new version of
- Original Message -
From: David Gilham
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 5:37 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Perfection
In the meantime
could any one who has found any bugs or incompatibilities in Perfection
please email them to me at david (at) davidgilham (dot) me (dot
Dilwyn Jones writes:
Although I don't think Freddy gets much time for QLing these days,
he speaks nostalgically of his time with the QL.
I happened to mention Quanta's QL Is 21 meeting to him. He said
it may be of interest to him and might wish to attend, if only for
nostalgic
reasons, if
Although I don't think Freddy gets much time for QLing these days,
he speaks nostalgically of his time with the QL.
I happened to mention Quanta's QL Is 21 meeting to him. He said
it may be of interest to him and might wish to attend, if only for
nostalgic
reasons, if his work etc allows at the
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Duncan
Neithercut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Many thanks for your efforts on behalf of Perfection users.
And a genuine special thanks for letting us know what the
programme is.
Thanks ... just a part of the fun of being a 'ql_user' ... :-)
If you are successful in
Many thanks for your efforts on behalf of Perfection users.
And a genuine special thanks for letting us know what the
programme is.
If you are successful in making contact - do you plan to
ask for the source to be made available as PD or freeware
and the same for other DP programs that are not
Yes, you get drunks and a few fights, but nothing like you get over here. (And
that's only the QL shows)
Are the fights because the pubs are ... licenced ?
(how's that for getting back on topic?)
Wolfgang
___
QL-Users Mailing List
In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
I can put together a complete set of files for you Dilwyn. But might be
better to get the v6a11 Dave obviously has. Question is, is there any real
differnce in the two versions?
massive snip here
I'm just thinking Darren, if we can get your
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 at 00:31:09, Roy wood wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
He loaned me a green cloth - and those who go to shows will recognise
it. I too met him again recently and he formally gave the cloth to me!
I didn't know you had 'taken the cloth' I must treat you with a new
reverence!
I
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 at 08:39:23, Tony Firshman wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 at 00:31:09, Roy wood wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
He loaned me a green cloth - and those who go to shows will recognise
it. I too met him again recently and he formally gave the cloth to me!
George Gwilt wrote:-
The version I have, which I amended so that it would print files, is v
6.01.
What is yrs?
From memory, I think it is v6.10 - but stand to be corrected.
I will check this evening.
Darren.
This
George Gwilt wrote:-
The version I have, which I amended so that it would print files, is v
6.01.
What is yrs?
From memory, I think it is v6.10 - but stand to be corrected.
I will check this evening.
Darren.
Darren, on the assumption that the version you have is th emost up to date
Wed, 13 Oct 2004 08:50:45 +0100,() Tony Firshman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /wrote:
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 at 08:39:23, Tony Firshman wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 at 00:31:09, Roy wood wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
He loaned me a green cloth - and those who go to shows will
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 at 16:20:59, Wolfgang Lenerz wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Not even a tablecloth with a pint on it?
Now that is more like it.
I have certainly done that with the green tablecloth - the stains are
there to prove it.
Tony
I can stand testament to that one!!
I remember
In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
George Gwilt wrote:-
The version I have, which I amended so that it would print files, is v
6.01.
What is yrs?
From memory, I think it is v6.10 - but stand to be corrected.
I will check this evening.
Darren.
Darren, on the assumption that
Rich Mellor wrote:
David Batty and Sector Software are still around - see:
_http://www.sectorsoftware.demon.co.uk/address.htm_
(http://www.sectorsoftware.demon.co.uk/address.htm)
email address:
_accordion AT sectorsoftware.demon.co.uk_
(mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
Which reminds
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 at 13:39:36, wrote:
(ref:
[EMAIL PROTECTED])
We were stood outside talking about old times (he used to sell some of
my software many years ago), and as he opened the boot of his car, what
did I see in there...Accordions. Apparently he's quite into them!
For new readers he
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tony Firshman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 at 20:35:00, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
After discussion with Dave Gilham over the weekend it seems we can best
make progress by
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
In a message dated 11/10/2004 20:54:30 GMT Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
After discussion with Dave Gilham over the weekend it seems we can best
make progress by contacting Dave Batty, who took over the complete
Digital Precision
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dilwyn Jones
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
After discussion with Dave Gilham over the weekend it seems we can
best
make progress by contacting Dave Batty, who took over the complete
Digital Precision software catalogue.
Contacting Freddie Vachha seems more of an unknown.
- Original Message -
From: John Gilpin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 10:48 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Perfection: my take on it
The Membership databases from Quanta have a number of possible contact
addresses both snail and email BUT would I
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 at 20:57:47, John Sadler wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
- Original Message -
From: John Gilpin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 10:48 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Perfection: my take on it
The Membership databases from Quanta
The Membership databases from Quanta have a number of possible contact
addresses both snail and email BUT would I be contravening the Data
Protection Act by revealing the same?
John Gilpin,
Quanta Membership Secretary.
Not if they have given their express permission
- Original Message -
From: Tony Firshman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 9:04 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Perfection: my take on it
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 at 20:57:47, John Sadler wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
- Original Message
He loaned me a green cloth - and those who go to shows will recognise
it. I too met him again recently and he formally gave the cloth to me!
I didn't know you had 'taken the cloth' I must treat you with a new
reverence!
--
Roy Wood
Q Branch. 20 Locks Hill, Portslade, Sussex.BN41 2LB
Tel: +44 (0)
At 23:10 12/10/2004 +0100, you wrote:
So, if they are so easy to find, what is all this topic about?
It is obvious that Quanta's help is not required (again) :-(
John Gilpin.
Goodness, what planet
If you had wanted to help and maintain confidentiality you would surely
have sent an email
Dave Gilham wrote:-
My understanding is that I need freddies permission to release the
modified binary to the general QL communinity and that I am under a
Non disclosure arregement as regards the sources.I seem To have lost that
agreement but that is the gist of of it. By the way does freddy
Per Witte wrote:-
Darren runs a very good piss-up (sorry QL show) form time to time (8-)#
I think you have missed them all, and good they were too.
Does anyone remember whether Ive been to one? (Reply off-list, please!)
Per,
I don't even remember if I'VE been to one, and I apparently run
H.
Now I'm confused.
I was told by Mark years ago that Freddy gave the OK for Perfection to be
released as freeware. So, providing you (Dave) are OK about releasing any
of your modifications on the public, I don't see what the problem is.
Cheers,
Darren Branagh,
Bank of Ireland -
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 at 20:35:00, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
After discussion with Dave Gilham over the weekend it seems we can best
make progress by contacting Dave Batty, who took over the complete
Digital Precision
gwicks wrote:
Thanks Marcel. I think we need to know he would agree to a wider
distribution of your version of EasyPtr. We would have to decide
if this
should be a charged or an free upgrade. (My feeling is that it is
a
significant upgrade and therefore should be charged, but then you
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], gwicks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
- Original Message -
From: Malcolm Cadman
( For info : Mark was previously a regular member of the London Quanta
Group )
I gathered that at present he is no longer programming, but now involved
in live public events where he
pointer to a complete system palette. How to create
one is for example shown in my different colourway_bas examples.
or do it with QCoCo ;)
Wolfgang
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.quanta.org.uk/mailing.htm
by:Subject: Re: [ql-users]
Perfection
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
s.q-v-d.com
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 at 09:35:44, wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Brian,
I wasn't being sarcastic at all, nor elitist. I thought the last DP
released version was generally available as PD - I hadn't looked for it, as
I was one of those who bought the entire DP collection of programs from
Thu, 7 Oct 2004 16:54:19 +0100,() [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/wrote:
Oh... Sorry!!
I had thought it was available, just the hi-res screen version that
wasn't.
Dilwyn - is it in your PD library??
If it isn't I would be glad to provide it :-)
Phoebus
_
I bet you would
I have it
John Sadler wrote:-
Copyright was introduced so that the author could get a reasonable
recompense for his/hers efforts.
Of course when the lawyers have finished it all becomes unreasonable!
However that does not change the moral ideas behind copyright.
It seems totally unreasonable to me that
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 at 11:32:06, wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
snip
I recall when he got that Nissan 300ZX Turbo Sports car - bought entirely
with DP proceeds.
Indeed.
Did he tell you the story?
There were plenty of similar Nissans about with a slightly different
names. This one was top of
- Original Message -
From: Brian Kemmett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Perfection
Im not quite sure if that was a sarcastic aside?? I thought it was a
genuine
observation. It seems to me that the QL WORLD is getting too elitist and
forgetting the bottom of the heap, you
Tony wrote:-
Did he tell you the story?
There were plenty of similar Nissans about with a slightly different
names. This one was top of the range and worth, at the time £22,000. He
got it for £17,000 because the salesman thought it was the cheaper
model.
Were you there when he did wheelies
On 8 Oct 2004 at 11:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Moral copyright is all very well, until someone gets their solicitor onto
you. Just because you're giving it away for free doesnt make it right.
Mopral copyright is not very well - simply because what is moral to me isn't
to you, or
On 8 Oct 2004 at 8:36, Brian Kemmett wrote:
The problem as I said, is that the new version will not filter a database
past the first stage. applying further filters simply applies a filter where
nothing is selected. On inspection of the filter screen from level 2 onwards
just shows 'MEMO',
On 7 Oct 2004 at 21:12, gwicks wrote:
Brian I can feel your frustration, but I not sure what you are talking about
is elitism. I think it is just plain, damned inefficiency and muddle.
Well, I do understand that those people who have given up the QL World just
couldn't be bothered anymore.
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 at 21:12:51, gwicks wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
- Original Message -
From: Brian Kemmett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Perfection
Im not quite sure if that was a sarcastic aside?? I thought it was a
genuine
observation. It seems to me that the QL
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 at 13:39:55, wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Tony wrote:-
Did he tell you the story?
There were plenty of similar Nissans about with a slightly different
names. This one was top of the range and worth, at the time £22,000. He
got it for £17,000 because the salesman
Tony wrote:-
Brian I can feel your frustration, but I not sure what you are talking
about
is elitism. I think it is just plain, damned inefficiency and muddle. Put
another way the one thing you should never do in this life is to ask any
QL-er to run a piss up in a brewery.
Darren runs a very
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 2:37 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Perfection
On 8 Oct 2004 at 8:36, Brian Kemmett wrote:
The problem as I said, is that the new version will not filter a database
past the first stage. applying further filters simply applies a filter
where
, 2004 9:35 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Perfection
Brian,
I wasn't being sarcastic at all, nor elitist. I thought the last DP
released version was generally available as PD - I hadn't looked for it,
as
I was one of those who bought the entire DP collection of programs from
freddy for about 100 quid
On 8 Oct 2004 at 15:31, Brian Kemmett wrote:
(...)
Its advertised a high colour upgrade and the front end is version 4.12,
whilst the engine is still v3.14. I have returned to using my old version
front end (v4.07) which works perfectly OK. I know it must be the front end
at fault because
On 8 Oct 2004 at 9:44, David Gilham wrote:
(...)
. For what its worth Perfection has not been released as
freeware or public domain and I would need permission from Freddy Vaccha
to relase the binary let alone the sources to the general QL community.
Hmm, Darren stated:
Freddy gave
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Brian Kemmett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Darren, Just for the record, I also purchased Perfection (v3.10) from
DP when it was released, and I still use it quite heavily. It is easy
to use and fast. I have got very used to it, but with a high resolution
display it
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Brian,
I wasn't being sarcastic at all, nor elitist. I thought the last DP
released version was generally available as PD - I hadn't looked for it, as
I was one of those who bought the entire DP collection of programs from
freddy for about
gwicks wrote:
A more recent case is EasyPtr. You cannot use this with the new colours.
I just came off the phone with Albin. In the course of the
conversation we recognised that we would have met tomorrow anyway at a
wedding of a mutual friend, so I will have some time to talk to him
and sort
Were you there when he did wheelies around a car park after a QL
show -
Leyland I think - soon after he got the car?
I remember wheelies around the Leyland car park - it was same night
that I got a flat battery in my old Ford Crapi (as Freddy used to call
it).
I think it might have been the same
On 8 Oct 2004 at 11:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Moral copyright is all very well, until someone gets their
solicitor onto
you. Just because you're giving it away for free doesnt make
it right.
Mopral copyright is not very well - simply because what is moral to
me isn't
to you, or
Darren runs a very good piss-up (sorry QL show) form time to time
(8-)#
^
|
---
Not much of that there after all the dark stuff from Mr G. in
I couldn't manage one this year - as my son took priority!! I only
see him
on weekends, as I have to work in Dublin, and it would have meant
giving up
one of my weekends with him for the Show. I handed in my resignation
lately
to the bank where I've worked for 7 years, purely 'cos I miss him
That was probably Bernd Reinhardt then. I'll come with him to
QL2004.
OK, s we know what HE'll be doing on that day...:-)
Wolfgang
He he, I feel a Data Design workshop coming on at QL2004. Either that,
or lock Bernd in a room by himself not to come out until it's sorted!
--
Dilwyn Jones
- Original Message -
From: David Gilham
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Perfection: my take on it
My understanding is that I need freddies permission to release the
modified binary to the general QL communinity and that I am under a
Non disclosure arregement as regards the sources.I seem
- Original Message -
From: Malcolm Cadman
( For info : Mark was previously a regular member of the London Quanta
Group )
I gathered that at present he is no longer programming, but now involved
in live public events where he does readings, etc. So his interest has
moved to the
On 8 Oct 2004 at 18:34, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
And just imagine the field days lawyers would have if they'd had to
plead
whether something was moral or not. Shudder.
Wolfgang
I thought you were a lawyer, Wolfgang?
yup.
Or is that what you meant???
Well...
Wolfgang
I'll put an appeal in the next issue of Toady to see if anyone knows
of is whereabouts these days.
Dilwyn Jones
- Original Message -
From: gwicks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 7:32 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Perfection: my take
A more recent case is EasyPtr. You cannot use this with the new
colours.
I just came off the phone with Albin. In the course of the
conversation we recognised that we would have met tomorrow anyway
at a
wedding of a mutual friend, so I will have some time to talk to
him
and sort this
]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Perfection: my take on it
On 8 Oct 2004 at 9:44, David Gilham wrote:
(...)
. For what its worth Perfection has not been released as
freeware or public domain and I would need permission from Freddy Vaccha
to relase the binary let alone the sources to the general QL
gwicks wrote:
Thanks Marcel. I think we need to know he would agree to a wider
distribution of your version of EasyPtr. We would have to decide if this
should be a charged or an free upgrade. (My feeling is that it is a
significant upgrade and therefore should be charged, but then you would
If Freddie Vaccha gave permission for Perfection to become freeware, then
why can't it be released eh
- Original Message -
From: gwicks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 8:23 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Perfection
- Original Message
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Perfection
- Original Message -
From: Phoebus Dokos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Perfection
.
Not entirely true :-) I submitted that idea to my graduating supervisor
professor at the uni and I was approved :-) That means that the
ql-archive
Darren, you are missing my point.. If DP released the original PERFECTION as
freeware, then why isn't THAT version available?
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 11:13 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Perfection
Freddy gave
]
cc:
Sent by:Subject: Re: [ql-users]
Perfection
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Thu, 7 Oct 2004 16:54:19 +0100,() [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/wrote:
Oh... Sorry!!
I had thought it was available, just the hi-res screen version that
wasn't.
Dilwyn - is it in your PD library??
If it isn't I would be glad to provide it :-)
Phoebus
Darren, you are missing my point.. If DP released the original
PERFECTION
as
freeware, then why isn't THAT version available?
Oh... Sorry!!
I had thought it was available, just the hi-res screen version that
wasn't.
Dilwyn - is it in your PD library??
No. I only have an older
since 1985.
It is beginning to feel like its time to move on and leave Qdos/Smsq/e to
all of you elitists
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 4:54 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Perfection
Oh... Sorry!!
I had thought
Geoff writes:
The status of Perfection is an old chestnut on this list and exactly the
same things are being said as the last time the thread appeared. And the
time before that. And the time before that. And ..the ...time
before. zz. (snore).
No one knows what the status of
In a message dated 05/10/04 19:48:34 GMT Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I use Perfection with SMSQE (v3.07) and it works well. However I had to
alter
my version because at one point the register D1 no longer contained what
the
authors expected. I reported this alteration in QL
- Original Message -
From: P Witte
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Perfection
I can only apologise for my tardy reaction. Im not one of those few
people
who have had experience of chasing up old software, but Im all for it. In
particular, Id be interested in updated versions of QLiberator
- Original Message -
From: Phoebus Dokos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Perfection
.
Not entirely true :-) I submitted that idea to my graduating supervisor
professor at the uni and I was approved :-) That means that the ql-archive
will be a reality (that is if I want
P Witte wrote:
snip
I can only apologise for my tardy reaction. Im not one of those few people
who have had experience of chasing up old software, but Im all for it. In
particular, Id be interested in updated versions of QLiberator and EasyPtr.
Id even be prepared to pay a reasonably unreasonable
Geoff writes:
QLiberator had two authors and one, whom I believe has the only copies of
the code, has disappeared. (I put that in inverted commas as we amateur
genealogists have means of tracing people whether dead or alive)
Surely someone on this list must know the name of the 'disappeared'
François Van Emelen writes:
P Witte wrote:
snip
What do you mean by
'Id even be prepared to pay a reasonably unreasonable amount for the
privilege'
reasonable reasonably reasonable reasonably unreasonable unreasonable
Reasonably clear?
Per
] Subject: Re: [ql-users] Perfection
s.q-v-d.com
In a message dated 04/10/04 16:13:12 GMT Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello.. Does anyone know if the old Digital Precision program PERFECTION was
ever finished being updated for smsq/e? I believe Mark Knight was working on
it a couple of years ago, and according to QLToday
Thanks to all that have replied to my question. It looks like I can safely
assume that PERFECTION is buried in history
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 10:57 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Perfection
In a message dated
]
cc:
Sent by:Subject: Re: [ql-users]
Perfection
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Brian Kemmett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Thanks to all that have replied to my question. It looks like I can
safely assume that PERFECTION is buried in history
No ... more dormant at present in terms of being updated.
The original version works fine in SMSQ/E, it
The status of Perfection is an old chestnut on this list and exactly the
same things are being said as the last time the thread appeared. And the
time before that. And the time before that. And ..the ...time
before. zz. (snore).
No one knows what the status of Perfection is or of all
Hi Brian,
I have a version Mark gave me shortly before he left the QL scene. It works
well, at least I have used it without too much trouble, and the
configurator can now cope with screen larger than 512x256 - I use it on a
17 Monitor at 1024x768 without problem.
Mark and Dave Gilham where both
Just checked on Mark's website, no mention of Perfection.
The email address on there is webmaster AT the-furnace DOT demon DOT
co DOT uk
The only QL program on his site is Editor 3.07K. I have most of his
other stuff on my website (K-Base, MK Utils etc etc) but not
Perfection. Darren, if you
dont suppose you could let me have a copy
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 4:19 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Perfection
Hi Brian,
I have a version Mark gave me shortly before he left the QL scene. It
works
well
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
It was Steve and Freddy Vaccha.
I was under the impression it was PD, I know Dave Gilham and Mark Knight
did work on it a few years ago to allow it to work with larger screen sizes
etc. under QPC or Aurora etc. The window could be
96 matches
Mail list logo
