Hello everybody!!!
I am using qmail1.03 on a rh7.0.
I would like to use qmailadmin 0.39.
but I can't log in, I need 'postmaster' but I don't know who is he.
however I use omail and it run very wel.
Thanks fo your support.
* Agi Subagio [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010125 03:00]:
How to add more rblsmtpd process to check another blacklist resource like
"relays.mail-abuse.org", "blackholes.mail-abuse.org" or
"dialups.mail-abuse.org"?
(lart@socha):(~)$ cat /service/smtp/run
#!/bin/sh
QMAILDUID=`id -u qmaild`
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 10:32:11AM +0100, fred wrote:
I am using qmail1.03 on a rh7.0.
I would like to use qmailadmin 0.39.
but I can't log in, I need 'postmaster' but I don't know who is he.
however I use omail and it run very wel.
Qmailadmin is a tool for managing a "vpopmail" setup. If you
qmail Digest 25 Jan 2001 11:00:00 - Issue 1255
Topics (messages 55846 through 55910):
Re: qmail-ldap
55846 by: Pedro Melo
conf-split
55847 by: Peter van Dijk
55862 by: Peter van Dijk
55869 by: Markus Stumpf
55885 by: James R Grinter
55887
Hello,
I know that well so I put "5" but I can't take too much time to send my
mails ...
Regards
Frip'
- Original Message -
From: "Markus Stumpf" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Jacques Frip' WERNERT" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 8:08 PM
Subject:
I have been lurking on this list for a while.
Osmosis!
I think I am learning. I certainly know things not to ask. ^|~
Some things seem to be somewhat philosophical however and I do not know all the
history.
Perhaps the long-time residents may care to expound. Hopefully other lurkers are
I'm trying to make a Perl program that is called by the .qmail file for a
single account but recieves messages for several extension addresses. To
clarify, a single account, bob, will be recieving for bob-john, bob-jill, etc.
This program is supposed to database certain parts of the message,
I think he has been using majordomo in the past. It is expected.
On Tue, 23 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would think someone skilled enough to run a SMTP server would know how
to unsubscribe from a mailing list.
With ezmlm-style lists, you send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In this
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 05:47:48AM -0600, Matthew Patterson wrote:
I'm trying to make a Perl program that is called by the .qmail file for a
single account but recieves messages for several extension addresses. To
clarify, a single account, bob, will be recieving for bob-john, bob-jill, etc.
Hello!!!
is there a way to set max number of account for
each different domain name?
Thanks
I'm trying to make a Perl program that is called by the .qmail file for a
single account but recieves messages for several extension addresses. To
clarify, a single account, bob, will be recieving for bob-john, bob-jill, etc.
This program is supposed to database certain parts of the message,
I noticed that qmail-pop3d always responds with:
+OK 0 to the pop3 command LAST
This behavior makes pop3 clients like fetchmail unable to know which
messages are new and thus download all the messages. So running fetchmail
two successive times without deleting mail from the pop3 server would
Hi,
I've installed qmail, ezmlm and vpopmail on redhat 6.2.
Now I make some tests.
Sending mails on the machine himself it's ok.
e.g. local user to virtuell pop user and return.
test via telnet will not work:
user@anyhost:~ telnet 10.10.4.4 25
Trying 10.10.4.4...
Connected to 10.10.4.4.
Hi,
I've installed qmail, ezmlm and vpopmail on redhat 6.2.
Now I make some tests.
Sending mails on the machine himself it's ok.
e.g. local user to virtuell pop user and return.
test via telnet will not work:
user@anyhost:~ telnet 10.10.4.4 25
Trying 10.10.4.4...
Connected to 10.10.4.4.
The Problem is the same, when i try
telnet 127.0.0.1 25
---
Hi,
I've installed qmail, ezmlm and vpopmail on redhat 6.2.
Now I make some tests.
Sending mails on the machine himself it's ok.
e.g. local user to virtuell pop user and return.
test via telnet will not work:
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 01:16:47PM +0100, OK 2 NET - Andr Paulsberg wrote:
[trying to deduce bcc address for program delivery]
The envelope recipient can be found in the Delivered-To: field in the headers.
Program deliveries don't get messages with a Delivered-To: header, see
man qmail-command.
I noticed that qmail-pop3d always responds with: +OK 0 to the pop3
command LAST
This behavior makes pop3 clients like fetchmail unable to know which
messages are new and thus download all the messages. So running
fetchmail two successive times without deleting mail from the pop3
server
On a production environment is it safe to patch qmail source and make
setup check once again.
Any precautions should be taken ?
Thanks.
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 01:24:29PM +0100, Thomas Knig wrote:
Hi,
I've installed qmail, ezmlm and vpopmail on redhat 6.2.
Now I make some tests.
Sending mails on the machine himself it's ok.
e.g. local user to virtuell pop user and return.
test via telnet will not work:
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 12:08:22PM +0100, Jacques Frip' WERNERT wrote:
I know that well so I put "5" but I can't take too much time to send my
mails ...
No, you obviously don't. Otherwise you'd noticed that the the first
retry for a message in the queue starts after 6m40s so any value lower
OK
it's my mistake ... :-(
many thanks
-Ursprngliche Nachricht-
Von: Alex Pennace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 25. Januar 2001 13:54
An: Thomas Knig
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Betreff: Re: can't receive mails via telnet on port 25
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 01:24:29PM
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 09:06:52AM +0200, Kaj-Michael Lang wrote:
I'm having a very serious problem.. the mail queue is full of messages
(about 31k) and local delivery is very slow if at all. I get lot of those
temporary delivery errors in the logs.
Sorry, I can't find the error message in
On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, Alex Pennace wrote:
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 05:47:48AM -0600, Matthew Patterson wrote:
I'm trying to make a Perl program that is called by the .qmail file for a
single account but recieves messages for several extension addresses. To
clarify, a single account, bob, will be
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 10:33:18PM +1100, Rod... Whitworth wrote:
Q1:
I have learnt that qmail does not issue reply codes indicating permanent failure for
invalid users/mailboxes.
I know that these messages will eventually bounce but (apart from the issue of
determining whether a recipient
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 02:49:15PM +, Eng. Ramy M. Hassan wrote:
On a production environment is it safe to patch qmail source and make
setup check once again.
Yes.
Any precautions should be taken ?
You should shut down all qmail services before doing a "make setup",
otherwise some
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 04:35:58AM -0500, Robin S. Socha wrote:
* Agi Subagio [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010125 03:00]:
How to add more rblsmtpd process to check another blacklist resource like
"relays.mail-abuse.org", "blackholes.mail-abuse.org" or
"dialups.mail-abuse.org"?
(lart@socha):(~)$
On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, Markus Stumpf wrote:
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 09:06:52AM +0200, Kaj-Michael Lang wrote:
I'm having a very serious problem.. the mail queue is full of messages
(about 31k) and local delivery is very slow if at all. I get lot of those
temporary delivery errors in the
On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, Eng. Ramy M. Hassan wrote:
On a production environment is it safe to patch qmail source and make
setup check once again.
Any precautions should be taken ?
Thanks.
Content-Type: text/html; name="unnamed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
ah ok thanx a lot.
Where do u find this value "6m40" ?
Regards
Frip
- Original Message -
From: "Markus Stumpf" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Jacques Frip' WERNERT" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: "Markus Stumpf" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2001 1:54 PM
Subject: Re:
I keep receiving this message but I don't know what's wrong with it
Has anyone experienced anythink like that?
Many thanks
- Original Message -
From: "Cron Daemon" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Cron root@ns1
run-parts --report /etc/cron.daily
/etc/cron.daily/cfengine:
Dear all,
I got after startup of qmail (setup regarding to LWQ) many of the following
messages in
/var/log/qmail/current:
2001-01-25 13:22:29.687206500 alert: cannot start: unable to read controls
Does anybody know the root cause of the problem?
Which files do you need to analyze this
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 02:49:15PM +, Eng. Ramy M. Hassan wrote:
On a production environment is it safe to patch qmail source and make
setup check once again.
Any precautions should be taken ?
Yes, stop qmail while doing 'make setup check', and make sure your
patches don't break anything.
On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, root wrote:
I keep receiving this message but I don't know what's wrong with it
Has anyone experienced anythink like that?
Many thanks
- Original Message -
From: "Cron Daemon" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Cron root@ns1
run-parts --report /etc/cron.daily
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 01:30:16PM -0800, root wrote:
I keep receiving this message but I don't know what's wrong with it
Has anyone experienced anythink like that?
It looks like you sent this to the wrong list. This is the qmail list.
Chris
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 01:30:16PM -0800, root wrote:
I keep receiving this message but I don't know what's wrong with it
Has anyone experienced anythink like that?
Many thanks
- Original Message -
From: "Cron Daemon" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Cron root@ns1
run-parts --report
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 02:31:58PM +0100, Jacques Frip' WERNERT wrote:
Where do u find this value "6m40" ?
See qmail-send.c. chanskip[remote] ist initialized to 20 and qmail uses
a quadratic retry schedule. This results in the tables that can found at
e.g.
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 02:42:11PM +0100, Marcus Korte wrote:
Dear all,
I got after startup of qmail (setup regarding to LWQ) many of the following
messages in
/var/log/qmail/current:
2001-01-25 13:22:29.687206500 alert: cannot start: unable to read controls
Does anybody know the root
I keep receiving this message but I don't know what's wrong with it
...
/etc/cron.daily/cfengine:
Call alaire tech support.
cfengine is cfengine (http://www.iu.hioslo.no/cfengine/), not
Allaire ColdFusion.
And neither of these products has anything to do with qmail. Please
On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear all,
I got after startup of qmail (setup regarding to LWQ) many of the
following messages in /var/log/qmail/current: 2001-01-25
13:22:29.687206500 alert: cannot start: unable to read controls
Does anybody know the root cause of the
Kaj-Michael Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Read the subject... anyway we have found the reason. Probably a messed up
solaris filesystem that says it has lots of space free but when you write
you have no free space.
You're probably just out of inodes.
Charles
--
Hello.
I'm setup two mail servers (powered by qmail).
#1 server maintained only local users pop3 and smtp (i.e. all mail for local
users do not send to server #2 and placing direct into users mailbox) and
working only for local network.
#2 server maintained only smtp service and look to
Eng. Ramy M. Hassan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I noticed that qmail-pop3d always responds with: +OK 0 to the pop3
command LAST.
LAST is a broken design; it requires the server to maintain state information
which really should be stored on the client.
This behavior makes pop3 clients like
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 06:21:31PM +0300, Michail A.Baikov wrote:
Hello.
I'm setup two mail servers (powered by qmail).
#1 server maintained only local users pop3 and smtp (i.e. all mail for local
users do not send to server #2 and placing direct into users mailbox) and
working only for
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 07:53:48AM -0800, john roberts wrote:
I sometimes get this message when I am trying to send mail from Outlook 2000
or 97 to qmail 1.03 server:
No transport provider was available for delivery to this recipient.
Dies this message pop up immediately or after some
Sounds more like an internal Outlook-problem.
thought maybe qmail-smtpd was not running when I sent them mailnot sure
Possibly your concurrency setting for tcpserver (SMTP) is too low. Check
the logs and correct the -c switch of tcpserver.
Regards, Frank
john roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No transport provider was available for delivery to this recipient.
This comes up a lot -- if you search the qmail mailing list archives,
one of the pointers is to this MS kb article:
This question probably belongs in a fetchmail forum. Unfortunately, my
recent attempts to subscribe to the fetchmail mailing list have ended in
failure, so you may not have any luck finding a fetchmail forum.
I was trying to use fetchmail to retrieve messages from a pop3 account
on a server
There is nothing in /var/log/maillog when this happens. Its like it never
gets to the mailserver to process. Typically the message sits in the
outlook outbox for a few seconds before I get the message back "no
delivery". How do I look to see what the tcpservers max connection limit
is?
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 10:26:33AM -0600, Kris Kelley wrote:
[snip]
Probably because that other pop3 server allows for the "LAST" POP3 command.
"LAST" returns the number of the last message downloaded. Ideally this
should be enough to determine which messages are new, but only after some
john roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No transport provider was available for delivery to this
recipient.This comes up a lot -- if you search the qmail
mailing list archives,one of the pointers is to this MS kb
article:
From my experience, it's not
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 10:17:07AM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
john roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No transport provider was available for delivery to this recipient.
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q197/4/17.ASP?LN=EN-USSD=gnFR=0
Basically, they're violating the
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 08:40:12AM -0800, john roberts wrote:
delivery". How do I look to see what the tcpservers max connection limit
is?
tcpservers option "-c" defines the number of simultaneous connections.
Default is 40.
See
http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp/tcpserver.html
You have to
How do I look to see what the tcpservers max connection limit
If the -c switch is not used it's tcpservers standard setting of 40.
See http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp/tcpserver.html
Frank
Hi --
I'm trying to install qmail on a Solaris box, and when running "make setup
check" I'm getting the following string:
... [happy compile messages] ...
./compile dns.c
"/usr/include/arpa/nameser.h", line 127: warning: const is a keyword in
ANSI C
"/usr/include/arpa/nameser.h", line 127:
Hello,
I have add a 'vmailmgrquotas' file in /var/qmail/control/
What have I to do to made qmail read this file ?
whitch daemon must be restarted ?
This is my ps :
176 ?S 0:00 supervise qmail
186 ?S 0:00 qmail-send
187 ?S 0:00 splogger qmail
188
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 05:42:56PM +0100, Peter van Dijk wrote:
qmail-pop3d sorts messages based on
size, so supporting LAST would yield wrong results anyway.
Hmmm ... are you sure?
From looking at the code I'd say it's sorted by modification time.
\Maex
--
SpaceNet AG|
HI! i've compiled qmail on mi server and it works well!
Now, i'm still trying to add a virtualdomain,
modifying the locals/rcpthost files ,
and in virtualdomain file (newvirtualdomain:newuser).
But if i try to send mail to newuser@hostname, the delivery happen! so the
account
Hi,
My SMTP server is in the ORBS list because:
X-Token: qlyzkfjxdlcfhlrh
X-Envelope-Sender: MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Envelope-Recipient: RCPT
TO:orbs-relaytest%manawatu.co.nz@[200.18.178.4]
How to fix it, please ?
Thanks,
Marcilio
Hello,
I have add a 'vmailmgrquotas' file in /var/qmail/control/
What have I to do to made qmail read this file ?
whitch daemon must be restarted ?
This is my ps :
176 ?S 0:00 supervise qmail
186 ?S 0:00 qmail-send
187 ?S 0:00 splogger qmail
188
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 11:06:49AM -0600, Fish Flowers wrote:
[snip]
typdef struct __ns_msg {
Are you sure it says 'typdef' there? It should be 'typedef'. Looks
like someone messed with your includefiles.
Greetz, Peter.
I am quite a new Qmail user, and so I'm looking for some help here.
We have a QMAIL server that our previous sysadmin left in open relay
mode. I am trying to close the security holes, but I don't understand Qmail
worth a damb (having used sendmail and being groomed on sendmail my entire
Well I guess that this one is definitely elligible for the "qmail security
challenge".
http://web.infoave.net/~dsill/qmail-challenge.html
If you don't count that as a bug in qmail, then I don't know what is a
bug...
Patrick.
"Scott Gifford" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
thing for the user called "newuser"
How can i solve this problem and split different users with different
virtualdomain??
Is virtualdomain still in "locals"?
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 03:18:53PM -0200, Marcilio Jorgensen Cassella wrote:
My SMTP server is in the ORBS list because:
X-Token: qlyzkfjxdlcfhlrh
X-Envelope-Sender: MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Envelope-Recipient: RCPT
TO:orbs-relaytest%manawatu.co.nz@[200.18.178.4]
You might
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 06:13:06PM +0100, Markus Stumpf wrote:
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 05:42:56PM +0100, Peter van Dijk wrote:
qmail-pop3d sorts messages based on
size, so supporting LAST would yield wrong results anyway.
Hmmm ... are you sure?
From looking at the code I'd say it's
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 06:05:48PM +0100, Massimiliano Santarelli wrote:
modifying the locals/rcpthost files ,
and in virtualdomain file (newvirtualdomain:newuser).
A domain has to be either in locals OR virtualdomains, not in both
(if you have it in both, locals overrides virtualdomains).
Hi!
I trying to stop smtp and pop-3...
when I did netstat -l I got this:
LISTEN tcp 0 0 *:pop-3 *:
* LISTEN tcp 0 0 *:smtp
So I want to stop both of them in order to use qmail, but I don't know how, I
did a ps ax and there is no sendmail process, it means that if I do a killall
-9 sendmail
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 03:18:53PM -0200, Marcilio Jorgensen Cassella wrote:
TO:orbs-relaytest%manawatu.co.nz@[200.18.178.4]
How to fix it, please ?
You probably have a
control/percenthack
file. Remove it.
\Maex
We've experienced this error a few times here, generally when sending large
files (2Mb). I thought it was a timeout problem with Outlook so I set the
server timeout to a higher figure in the internet email service and it
doesn't happen now.
-Original Message-
From: john roberts
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 06:05:48PM +0100, Massimiliano Santarelli wrote:
HI! i've compiled qmail on mi server and it works well!
Now, i'm still trying to add a virtualdomain,
modifying the locals/rcpthost files ,
and in virtualdomain file (newvirtualdomain:newuser).
But if i try to send
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 03:18:53PM -0200, Marcilio Jorgensen Cassella wrote:
Hi,
My SMTP server is in the ORBS list because:
X-Token: qlyzkfjxdlcfhlrh
X-Envelope-Sender: MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Envelope-Recipient: RCPT
TO:orbs-relaytest%manawatu.co.nz@[200.18.178.4]
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 10:39:26AM -0700, Dan Egli wrote:
We have a QMAIL server that our previous sysadmin left in open relay
mode. I am trying to close the security holes, but I don't understand Qmail
worth a damb (having used sendmail and being groomed on sendmail my entire
unix
rcpthosts is no good. We want to accept mail for ALL domains. This is a
primary mail server for many virtual domains. I need to be able to send to
any domain in existance. such a rcpt hosts file would be HUGE!
-Original Message-
From: Chris Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 10:39:26AM -0700, Dan Egli wrote:
[snip]
I have a tcprules file the directory it appears my predecessor left the
setup files in, and acording to the runline in PS (I still cannot find where
he is actually launching tcpserver for smtp but it is running) the file
should
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 12:40:47PM -0500, Patrick Bihan-Faou wrote:
Well I guess that this one is definitely elligible for the "qmail security
challenge".
http://web.infoave.net/~dsill/qmail-challenge.html
If you don't count that as a bug in qmail, then I don't know what is a
bug...
You
Well I guess that this one is definitely elligible for the
"qmail security challenge".
http://web.infoave.net/~dsill/qmail-challenge.html
I don't think so. The challenge says:
"Bugs that qualify for the prize, subject to the other conditions
outlined in these rules, must be one
"Patrick Bihan-Faou" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well I guess that this one is definitely elligible for the "qmail security
challenge".
http://web.infoave.net/~dsill/qmail-challenge.html
If you don't count that as a bug in qmail, then I don't know what is a
bug...
Sure, it's a bug. Dan didn't
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 11:26:09AM -0700, Dan Egli wrote:
rcpthosts is no good. We want to accept mail for ALL domains. This is a
primary mail server for many virtual domains. I need to be able to send to
any domain in existance. such a rcpt hosts file would be HUGE!
You should try reading
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 10:39:26AM -0700, Dan Egli wrote:
This file does exist, and it is readable, containing the following rule:
127.0.0.1:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
209.254.33.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
yet if I jump onto a machine that is not in these rules, and I telnet into
port 25, I can setup a
??
definitely not eligible. where's the exploit?
Patrick Bihan-Faou writes:
Well I guess that this one is definitely elligible for the "qmail security
challenge".
If you don't count that as a bug in qmail, then I don't know what is a
bug...
Patrick.
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 12:40:47PM -0500, Patrick Bihan-Faou wrote:
Well I guess that this one is definitely elligible for the "qmail security
challenge".
http://web.infoave.net/~dsill/qmail-challenge.html
If you don't count that as a bug in qmail, then I don't know what is a
bug...
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 12:52:35PM -0500, Chris Johnson wrote:
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 03:18:53PM -0200, Marcilio Jorgensen Cassella wrote:
My SMTP server is in the ORBS list because:
X-Token: qlyzkfjxdlcfhlrh
X-Envelope-Sender: MAIL FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've had a request to see if our qmail system can accommodate the following:
The customer wants to have his individual accounts receive mails addressed
to them, but in addition, he would like to have a copy of mail for specific
accounts cc'd to a "central repository" mail account.
Anyone done
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 10:55:01AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I trying to stop smtp and pop-3...
when I did netstat -l I got this:
LISTEN tcp 0 0 *:pop-3 *:
* LISTEN tcp 0 0 *:smtp
So I want to stop both of them in order to use qmail, but I don't know how, I
did a ps ax and
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 12:40:47PM -0500, Patrick Bihan-Faou wrote:
Well I guess that this one is definitely elligible for the
"qmail security
challenge".
http://web.infoave.net/~dsill/qmail-challenge.html
If you don't count that as a bug in qmail, then I don't know what is a
bug...
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 10:55:01AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
when I did netstat -l I got this:
LISTEN tcp 0 0 *:pop-3 *:
* LISTEN tcp 0 0 *:smtp
This is probably inetd listening on that ports.
Edit /etc/inetd.conf and comment the lines for "smtp" and "pop"/"pop3"
(i.e. put a '#' as
I know this is the wrong place to ask, but the
sqwebmail mailing list is incredibly slow/unpopulated.
Do any of you know where I could find documentation
for that package? I'm trying to do things like set up
multiple virtual domains, change my timeout time, etc.
Thanks,
Alex Le Fevre
Well, if i try to delete the virtualdomain from "locals" file,leaving it only in
the "virtualdomains" file, i obtain:
newuser@virtualdomain:
Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1)
thans
Massimiliano
On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, you wrote:
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 06:05:48PM +0100, Massimiliano
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 10:55:01AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I trying to stop smtp and pop-3...
when I did netstat -l I got this:
LISTEN tcp 0 0 *:pop-3 *:
* LISTEN tcp 0 0 *:smtp
So I want to stop both of them in order to use qmail, but I don't know how, I
did a ps ax and
Dan Egli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have a QMAIL server that our previous sysadmin left in open relay
mode. I am trying to close the security holes, but I don't understand Qmail
worth a damb (having used sendmail and being groomed on sendmail my entire
unix life).
Post the output of
Hello Chris
On 25-Jan-01, you wrote:
I think this last entry requires a patched rbslmptd. You could instead
use:
-r relays.msci.memphis.edu
relays.msci.memphis.edu is a mirror of relays.mail-abuse.org, but it runs
Dan's rbldns and gives out the TXT record that rblsmtpd needs.
Oh and for the fact that the challenge is closed. I mean cool more money to
FSF.
But still my comment is more on "what constitute a problem with qmail". I
don't really care for the challenge itself, but more on the attitude of
saying "this is not a qmail issue, but something else's fault".
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I trying to stop smtp and pop-3...
So I want to stop both of them in order to use qmail, but I don't know how, I
did a ps ax and there is no sendmail process, it means that if I do a killall
-9 sendmail nothing happen (I did) and the smtp and pop
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 01:56:45PM -0500, Patrick Bihan-Faou wrote:
Well failure to recognize that 0.0.0.0 is yourself is not quite DNS related
exploit. It is a bug.
If AOL or hotmail would decide to change their MX records to your mailserver
this will for sure also cause you problems.
But
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 06:27:34AM -0600, Matthew Patterson wrote:
Sure it is. The recipient address for that local delivery is stored in
the environment variable RECIPIENT. Additionally if instructions for
the delivery are in a .qmail-...-default file the part of the address
covered by the
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 11:26:09AM -0700, Dan Egli wrote:
rcpthosts is no good. We want to accept mail for ALL domains. This is a
No you don't. You want to accept mail for a small subset of the known
domains in the universe.
primary mail server for many virtual domains. I need to be able to
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 11:26:09AM -0700, Dan Egli wrote:
rcpthosts is no good. We want to accept mail for ALL domains. This is a
primary mail server for many virtual domains. I need to be able to send to
any domain in existance. such a rcpt hosts file would be HUGE!
You are not
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 11:26:09AM -0700, Dan Egli wrote:
rcpthosts is no good. We want to accept mail for ALL domains. This is a
primary mail server for many virtual domains. I need to be able to send to
any domain in existance. such a rcpt hosts file would be HUGE!
So what? qmail has no
Dan Egli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
rcpthosts is no good. We want to accept mail for ALL domains. This is a
primary mail server for many virtual domains. I need to be able to send to
any domain in existance. such a rcpt hosts file would be HUGE!
You're suffering from a common misunderstanding.
To all and anyone willing to listen,
I have qmail installed and running on Slackware 7.1, I have a wierd
problem with outbound
mail saying that it was sent the day after and not the current time.
I am running 2.4.0 and the BIOS clock
shows proper, my date shows proper in the system and my
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
