How about
KJ4LII? Should work OK.
--- On Sun, 5/3/09, redleg_8 redle...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: redleg_8 redle...@yahoo.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] 440 Repeater Project
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, May 3, 2009, 6:16 PM
Our club has 7 of the TK750 and two TK850 repeaters running on several
different mountaintops, mostly medium RF intense. They have worked without any
issues for a couple of years now. I don't know how they stack up against the
vertex, but they seem well suited for what we are doing with them.
Walter, that same chip could easily be built up on a small circuit board to
give a 2175 notch, with a very sharp response. Could probably build one up for
$20 or so.
Joe
--- On Thu, 9/18/08, ka1jfy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: ka1jfy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: CTCSS
The filter we're talking about is sufficiently wide to accomodate any drift,
and since the sampling is at a couple of hundred KHz, the filters are very
simple.
Joe
--- On Thu, 9/18/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
Apparently you've either been there or met Sid somewhere.
Joe
--- On Tue, 9/16/08, skipp025 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: skipp025 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: air com
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, September 16, 2008, 11:10 AM
The best PL filter I ever saw was one I built out of a digital SCF design a
couple of years ago. I realize that the paper is referencing commonly available
products, but I wish someone would make this thing up for sale.
Here is a link to the data sheet:
http://www.mix-sig.com/Msi5data12.pdf
Don't know why that link won't open, I'll try it again without the http.
www.mix-sig.com/Msi5data12.pdf
--- On Sun, 9/14/08, Joe Montierth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Joe Montierth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] CTCSS highpass filter paper
To: Repeater-Builder
Our club now owns six of the low split 750's and they work great.
Wouldn't have anything else for the price.
Joe
--- Eric Lemmon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doug,
Although the K2 repeater is the obvious choice for covering the
entire 2m
band, the K1 version will probably tune down okay.
A TO220 PNP transistor configured as emitter follower will work for
this. Tie the emitter of the new PNP to one fan terminal (the other
goes to 12v), the collector to ground, and the base to the sinking
point (open collector) of your controller.
Any PNP transistor capable of an amp or more of
An easy way to check for overload would be to install a HPF before the
RX, this would greatly cut down the 104.9 signal.
If you have a 2M/440 diplexer, like people use to split or combine
antennas, that would probably work, at least for a test to prove or
disprove this thought. Just connect
A couple of ideas:
1. Build a simple voltage regulator capable of the current you need for
the controlled stage. I think about a couple of amps, but you could
insert an ammeter and actually measure it. Set your radio to 1.5 watts
and then set the voltage to whatever gives you the desired output.
Looks like a highband Motran repeater from about 1969 or so. All
solid state, about 30 watts out.
Something like C43MSY for a partial model number.
What freq is it on now?
Good RX, kinda of weird TX (by today's standard). Has three old style
RF transistors in parallel to make the 30 watts out.
I think you need to identify what your priorities for this project are.
If it's not cost, then there are several ways to do this thing. It
seems like your biggest concern might be physical size of the cavity
package.
If that is the case, what I would do would be to get a repeater pair in
the
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 4/17/2007 22:57, you wrote:
Hello,
This email message is a notification to let you know that
a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the Repeater-Builder
group.
File: /dual_level_sq.pdf
Uploaded by : skyislandpage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A few years ago I designed a dual level squelch circuit that could be a
replacement for the Micor type carrier squelch. I built a couple of the
prototypes and put them into service, and they worked very well, you
really couldn't tell them from the real thing.
They were designed around readily
--- Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sometimes I wonder how in the World did I get a Ham Radio Lic , 25
Yrs
ago , Anyway here is what I need Help on I bought a 40 Amp Power
Adjustable Power supply with Volt and Amp Meters , I would like to
make something to test it Before putting it on a
I am interested, sent you a PM.
--- Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have 4 pcs Antenna Specialists (remember them?) ACJ-2401 J2
dual junction isolators. They don't like to tune down to the ham
bands so not of use to me. They came from a VHF tx combiner.
Pictures upon request (or they
--- Barry C' [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, the ASPB602 is four stacked dipoles, just like the DB224. My
point again is that resonance is NOT a requirement for an effective
and efficient antenna. The wider frequency coverage for this
antenna
is likely because the dipoles are
--- Barry C' [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Laryn Lohman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Antennas that work
both in commercial and
amateur
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 05:04:02 -
---
There is a place in the programming where you can make
the TA audio flat. I will try to find where it is in
the programming, and let you know here.
Joe
--- Yahoo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, the TA remains hot but I need flat audio. I
can call Kenwood tomorrow
but was hoping to finish this
The simplest way is just to get the IOTA supply and
float it across the battery. Thats it, nothing else
needed. Get an IOTA big enough to power whatever you
have, and still have some left over for charging. You
don't need (or want) diodes, resistors, or relays.
It shouldn't be that easy, but in
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269012A1.pdf
Techs get tech+ privs, code test gone for general and
extra.
Joe
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
--- Dave Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Question about this order is it effective
imidiately that the code is
no longer required for new licencing and the
licenced techs (w/o code) are
now equal to tech + (with code) ? OR is there an
effective on
after date?
New rules will
--- Kris Kirby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Mike Perryman wrote:
I have no idea about a tube version... but I have
a Micor 75W solid
state PA for 800 if you are interested lemme
know..
Not really. What I'm thinking is that a tube-type PA
would have less
noise
Hi All,
I am wanting to use one TX from our repeater
site,
to link to two link RX's, these are on opposite
sides of the repeater.
I was thinking about having two different CTCSS
tones, one for each, and then having the TX
generate
the two tones together. This way I can use
--- John Everson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello to the group.
My friend and I have a 75 Micor station on UHF that
I was trying to
resurrect to donate to a young local ham that has a
UHF machine that
needs to be replaced. The station in question was
already in the ham
bands, 444.xxx
Because of the frequency band, and the size of the
antennas, the spacing may have to be several
wavelenghts. Remember at this frequency a wavelength
is about 4 inches, and spacing is measured center to
center.
I think you would be better off just getting a panel
antenna with 12 dBi of gain and
Then MOTRAC must stand for More Old Tubes, Reeds, And
Crap
:)
Joe
--- Kevin Custer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was recently introduced to a Gentleman by the name
of Robert Swoger,
K9WVY. Bob was in the original MICOR Mobile design
team from 1969 on.
He was at Motorola from 1965 until
The frequency stamped on the tone has nothing to do
with the tolerence range of it. PL tones are stamped
to .1 Hz, but will generally work +- 1% or so, and are
spaced at 3-4% intervals.
This is probably a similiar tolerence, given the fact
that PL and 2 tone come from the same era and
started by
Pretty loose, I'd say about +- 1% would still work.
Thats about all the tolerance they could get with mass
produced reeds. Even more might work, but they
definately don't have to be dead on.
Joe
--- dallasreact112 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Does anybody in group know the frequncy
--- Dan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does any one have the proceedure for programming the
GLB ID chips.. I
believe its just a 2713. I have the programmer but
need help with the
code.
Dave N3CNJ
The GLB ID'er used a 2716 eprom. The way it was
programmed was to start at address 0 and
If the panels are isolated by a diode, it shouldn't
matter if they are different makes/models/sizes etc.
as long as their open circuit output voltages are
somewhat above that required by the regulator.
The simplest VR for a panel would be a high power
zener diode (or equivalent). The zener would
--- Jed Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey guys,
Alright, educate me on this a little bit.
I know of a few sights with ham repeaters, but they
are combined with
commercial stuff.
How is that done?
I mean, I know they use combiners, but do they
really make some antennas
that are tuned
Dave's points are good, I'd like to point out a couple
of other things.
We have used Astron supplies for years, and overall
have been happy with them. There are some drawbacks,
mainly the analog design is very wasteful of power,
and the units get very warm (hot). I have done some
measurements,
The easiest way to tell would be to measure the AC
current draw in idle. Then measure the DC current draw
in idle.
You can get a pretty close watt figure by multiplying
the amps times the voltage (115v) on the input side,
and doing the same thing on the DC side. The
difference between the two is
--- Mike Morris WA6ILQ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did this at a friend house and we ended up with
about 20
plugged into a half-dozen power strips and totalling
about
2 and a half amps of AC... He's got 112-114v of AC
at his
house so using 113 we get 255.2w ... divide by 1000
and
times
http://www.jars.net/
This shows a picture of the car, and the text of the
law. From what I read, the car doesn't meet the
criterion because it has no lights. Also, the use of
the car must be with the intent to impersonate a
police officer. I don't know what this guy was doing
when he was stopped
--- Glenn Little WB4UIV [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Paul
910 Kc is twice the 455 Kc IF. Possibly there is a
clue here. Motorola had
problems with spurs in the Metrum VHF ham
transceiver. It also used one
crystal for both transmit and receive. I guess that
this is a good data
point as
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
Can a VHF Micor mobile use an UHF Micor RX'er in a
direct swap out?
Or to say it a different way, I want an UHF RX'er in
a VHF Micor.
They appear to be a direct swap out, but are there
any pitfalls? They both
use their own channel elements,
We have been using the TKR-750's for a couple of years
with good results. They are rated at 50 watts
intermittant, or 25 continuous. We run ours at about
30 watts with no problems, not quite the 40 you were
asking for, but close.
Joe
--- BOB UNICK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yea yet me know how it
I have one of the 75 amp supplies working at a remote
site. We have not seen any noise from the unit, but
our equipment is all VHF and UHF, haven't checked it
down in HF, but at UHF we have seen no problems. We
have 20 UHF RX's and 6 VHF and have not seen any
degradation.
These IOTA's run much
--- wa9ba [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We put a DB 224 up after loosing 2 Diamond 510
antennas and a
station master to lightning about 5 years ago.
One of the advantages of a four-bay dipole antenna
over a fiberglass
vertical of similar gain is that the vertical
bandwidth is remarkably
--- DCFluX [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry about speaking FCC rules, but Auxilliary use
(Link Radios) is
only allowed above 222.5 MHz.
I think you missed the point of the UHF to lo-band
downconverter. The lo-band radios would only be used
as IF and demod.
Joe
Yahoo! Mail
Our club just removed from service an MSY station. It
is minus the tube PA, so is probably only 10 watts or
so. RX and TX were working fine when removed,
currently on 447.825 TX, 442.825RX. We were running it
on external power, so no idea if the PS is working,
but it's there. Was using external
I have not done this on a 420 Micor, but I have on a
450 Micor, which is essentially the same.
As Neil pointed out, all the interstage coupling is
done at 50 ohms, so you only need to decide how much
power you need, and modify accordingly.
The controlled stage will put out 2 to 7 watts, if you
http://www.tessco.com/products/getProductInfo.do?sku=12628
Joe
--- n9wys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK... I'm needing one of these animals. Of course,
I'd prefer to
have one out of the box as opposed to trying to
fabricate one out
of a number of feet of coax, both for esthetics as
well
--- w9mwq [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wonder if anyone has a simple diagram to build a
small circuit from 5
volts to about 8 volts. Was told I could use an
opto isolator, but am
not familiar with them. I'm getting ready to
interface the Kenwood TM-
V7 radios to the RVS-8 voter, am told it
--- Bob Dengler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But this begs another question: why does the RVS-8
require such a high COS
voltage? I don't think I own a radio that supplies
that much voltage on
COS, nor have a ever used a controller that required
8 volts of COS voltage.
Bob NO6B
The
The killer on these simulcast systems is in the
overlap areas. If the transmitters are only a few
miles apart, you could see some real problems, since
most everywhere is an overlap area. A rule of thumb is
that a simulcast system will never sound as good as a
non-simulcast system in the overlap
Yes, that will work just fine. Make sure you put in
fuses, and set the current limit down somewhat if you
are feeding a big battery bank.
Joe
--- David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on the repeater builder website there is a mod for
the astron rs35 where
you go into it and cut a trace then
500 AH would be large.
--- David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what do you consider large???
I have 3 25ah gel cells
- Original Message -
From: Joe Montierth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 1:45 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder
Whatever you got. .25 watt or bigger is OK.
Joe
--- David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what wattage 1k pot to parallel r4
- Original Message -
From: Joe Montierth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 1:45 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater
--- Jeff Corkren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where is the best place (other than Astron) to
purchase 2N3771 pass transistors for a Astron power
supply ? Anybody had luck using subs ? If so what
part number ? Thanks !
Jeff Corkren/W5PPB
Raymond, Mississippi
Go here and search for 2N3771 :
Check this out and see if it is the antenna you're
referring to:
http://www.rfsworld.com/RFSGlobal/datasheet.asp?PN=688S%2D1FAM=BaseStationAntennas
IIRC, years ago, PD made the antennas for Motorola. I
know this unit looks just like a Mot antenna I have.
Joe
--- wn1b8 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- na6df [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If any one is interested, I could use a 42-50 mhz
vertex. Older ftl-
1011 is OK, 4 channels plenty. For swap I have a
nice condition
Vertex VX-2000 with bracket, mic, power cord in good
shape. Would
also consider a radius or maxtrac, as long as
--- Laryn Lohman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Al Wolfe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've always thought good quality RG-8X was
an oxymoron.
use good quality RG-8X type cable for
Al, K9SI
Right Al, an oxymoron especially when used
Something you might look at would be one of the
lightweight fiberglass base station antennas made by
Antennex, Maxrad, etc. These only weigh about 4 or 5
pounds, you could also get several 6ft sections of
telescopic aluminum tubing to support it, much less
weight and size than the TV masting. For
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1st off that was not a put down!
I will not blow my on horn but
I can say if it works for you then
use it. BUT! It is not how antenna
physics work. Just think how much
better a system will work when we do
not try to change the laws and rules
of antenna
happen.
Mike
K1EG
- Original Message -
From: Joe Montierth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 10:22 AM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Inside a Flag pole
Tower
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1st off that was not a put
--- skipp025 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would hope Kevin would let the discussion
continue, as it is of VITAL importance to
anyone putting a non-ham repeater on the air.
..zzz..!
Sorry, I was snoring.
skipp :-)
Thats the way I am
--- Jim B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mch wrote:
Actually, 3 dB is the point at which you can first
notice a change in
the signal. As far as whether it is worth it is up
to the individual.
If a signal is 'fine', lowering it 3dB should not
make it unusable. The
change should be
There is probably no easier and cheaper way to do it
than a 567 chip. This will give you a logic low, or
pull to ground when it decodes. If you are having a
hard time making it work, double check your circuit
layout, make sure the device is good, etc. The 567 is
easy to align and fun to play
--- Q [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Memories...1959 Chrysler Saratoga Police special,426
Hemi,push button
automatic w/mechanical overdrive lever.Motorola
tube radio on
37mhz,Speedo went to 160,certified. BIG gas
tank...lousy mileage! Engine
still lives in buddys rail dragster...
I
--- Mathew Quaife [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I might have the number wrong, but refereing to
LMR-400, we've done been
down that road, but the RG-400, isn't that one just
as close to RG-214/U?
Mathew
No, no, no. Not even close. RG-214/U and LMR-400
are two entirely
different
Here's what you can do if both radios are
transformerless and have a single hot side and a
ground side. This will not work if both speaker leads
are hot, this will only work if the speaker amp goes
through a big capacitor then to the speaker, the other
side grounded:
Wire the hot side of each
--- Jim B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The last shop I worked for supplied 50-60 or more
TK350's to a local mfg
plant, using MII's and later TKR-820's, with one RCA
1000 rptr for a
while. There was never any problem like you're
describing.
But looking at my book, you're right. Tone is
--- Eric Lemmon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I really like the GM300's design, which mixes in the
PL modulation after
the voice audio limiter, thereby eliminating one of
the major causes of
repeater talk-off due to CTCSS tone compression.
73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
I think all the radio
--- mbloom0947 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Moto GM300 has a software programmable deviation
level with the
software setting from 0 to 55 on an arbitrary scale.
I thought that
by lowering the deviation level I would see limiting
in the deviation
level given the same microphone
--- Neil McKie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JOHN MACKEY wrote:
... snip ...
sort of like when capacitor measurements changed
from uuF to pF)
35-40 years ago?
I was doing this search late last night. Today, a
little more
fresh, I'll go back to work look at
--- JOHN MACKEY [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to build a filter and it requires I have a
few chokes of 2.2 mH value.
So I look in the Newark Allied catalogs and all
the chokes I am seeing are
labeled
µH (a u with a tail on the left)
rather than
mH
Was I asleep for a
--- Coy Hilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Come on...someone please say it...Most all radios
built for FM use on
commertial and or amature bands are designed for a
MAXIMUM of +-5Kc
deviation, period! Most receivers are built for
+-7.5 Kc band width.
What is to be gained from running
--- Joe Montierth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This post is about as relavent as the others.
RELEVANT YOU IDIOT!
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Send holiday email and support a worthy cause. Do good.
http://celebrity.mail.yahoo.com
Yahoo
It's not the 600 KHz that is the problem. The problem
is that the paging transmitters are spaced the same as
the TX/RX spacing on 2M, thus creating the possiblity
of a third-order mix.
Here is what is happening, mathematically:
146.94 + 152.24 - 152.84 = 146.34
When all the transmitters are
--- mch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If it's mixing in the receiver or transmitter,
notching one of the
offending signals may help (such as a notch cavity
on 152.240 or 152.840
MHz). Of course, it could be mixing in a number of
other places, too.
Joe M.
The first place to look is to
The frequency stability of any transmitter is only as
good as it's reference oscillator (be that a PLL or a
multiplied crystal)- dividing or multiplying the
frequency will not change that constant (in PPM). It
doesn't matter if you use a 100KHz, 1MHz, 10MHz or
100MHz reference frequency, if they
--- Glenn Little WB4UIV [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
With the finger printing software out now, yes, by
looking at the display
or printed data, the individual radio can be
identified. I do not mean that
they can tell the difference between a MICOR and a
MASTR. That is easy.
They can
--- Jim B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mathew Quaife wrote:
I generally don't get involved in online
dicussions such as this, but I will
have to concur on what Russ said, as I personally
called the FCC field
office about this matter about five months ago,
and what I was told is that
--- Gregg R. Lengling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Using tones below 60 Hz usually doesn't work for 2
reasons. #1 reason is that the transmitter will not
reproduce that low of a tone without distortion and
overdrivingand the receiver audio won't recover
it. #2 the lower the frequency the
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We all know what carrier squelch is so I won't go
there.
CTCSS (Private line) is also well known.
Now most newer ham gear has DCS CTCSS.
My question is about DPL, is this compatabile with
DCS?
If so will DCS do inverted code like DPL?
Lastly
55 dB should be adequate isolation for a repeater,
unless you are running a high gain pre-amp and/or high
power.
These duplexers are better in most ways than the BP/BR
type because they provide better isolation at most
frequencies further removed from the TX/RX. A small
spur on your TX that is
The isolator might fix the problem. The second
harmonic of the 146.7 is 293.4. If you subtract 147.3,
it comes up right on your input, 146.1.(Classic 2A-B
intermod) Same thing is going on with the other freqs.
Could also be mixing in your RX, or about any other
non-linear spot between the two
I have hooked up several TK-750, which I think are the
same audio-wise as the 850. The TD and RD ports are
flat audio (discriminator and modulator type), and
the TA and RA ports are emphasised (mike and speaker
type audio). The TA and RA are HP filtered to
eliminate PL.
Choose whichever one
of
additional comments presented by Joe
Montierth
One, the 10K resistor can be 1/4 watt or even
1/8 watt, the 1/2 watt
is
overkill. There is not much voltage across it
to generate any heat.
Two, depending on the size battery it is
attached to, you might want
97.213 and 97.201
213 tells how stations can be remotely controlled
(telcommand), and that if done by radio, you must use
an auxilliary station. 201 tells what an aux station
is, and the freqs that they can use.
Joe
--- wa9ba [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At a recent meeting buying or building a
--- Kevin Berlen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Over the weekend, I added a second UHF control
receiver at one of the sites
I take care of. The control RX antenna is up about
150ft. Previous to
adding the new RX, I could easily access the first
RX about 25 miles out.
Since adding the second
--- Steve Rodgers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone have design specifics (especially with
regard to the high pass
filter corner frequency, and passband-to-stopband
attenuation of the high
pass filter) of the M7716 Micor Squelch chip? Since
the M7716 chip is no
longer
--- Buley, Kenneth L (GE Consumer Industrial)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gee, when did unity become equal to -0- ???
(Unity Gain - A gain of one. That is, the signal is
output from a circuit at the same level at which it
entered.)
From ;
There is no separate certification issued under part
90 or 95 for a repeater. A radio is certified for a
certain service (part 90 or 95 or both). This radio
can be used as a mobile, base, repeater, portable,
etc, providing it meets the criterion for that
application in it's particular service.
--- Neil McKie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
An air conditioned room is nice but the radio must
type accepted
for the 0.00025% tolerance and so indicated on it's
label.
Neil
No, the rules only require that you maintain your
transmitter within 2.5 PPM, there is no rule that you
must
--- Q [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are wrong,it is illegal. Doesnt mean all those
people were right,that
doesnt make it legal. They just havent been caught
yet...
Please cite the FCC rule that would make this
illegal, I have read and re-read the rules for years
now, and have yet to
If anyone wants to continue this topic, you can bring
it over to a BBS that I moderate, dealing with GMRS.
http://www.popularwireless.com/cgi-bin/Ultimate.cgi
Go down to the GMRS forum and start a topic about
repeater requirements or whatever. There are lots of
licensed, seasoned operators on
- Original Message -
From: Joe Montierth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 10:42 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Using an HT for a
Transmitter -Thoughts
Ideas
--- Mathew Quaife [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Niel, actually I
--- w9mwq [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Need some input on this, what others think. I am
trying to pull all
the Regency stuff from the repeater, only thing left
is the
transmitter. I want to use a Yaesu FT-10R as an
exciter for the amp
to the repeater. What are some thoughts on this. I
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joe - thanks for the info. This particular MICOR UHF
Repeater I just picked
up came without a PA deck at all (someone else beat
me to it), so since I
was looking for one, I decided to try to find a
lower power one than the
usual 75 watt ones
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm looking for a MICOR UHF Repeater/Base Station
12-Watt 450-470 MHz PA
Deck, Motorola # TLE1683A. I have one of the 2-watt
versions of this PA,
which is just about identical except that there is
an attenuator that drops
the output power from
Have you ever measured the short squelch tail length
of your circuit? I
think the Micor squelch is around 2-3 milliseconds,
while the Mastr
II/modified MVP short squelch measures around 6
milliseconds.
I believe the SQ-1000 is spec'd for 20 milliseconds
release time with a
full
Scott Zimmerman and I have been working on an
analogue replica of the
Micor Squelch for some time (several years). Since
the Micor Squelch
chip is still available we haven't spent any serious
time perfecting
it. Some day the Micor Squelch chip will be hard to
come by, and we'll
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, all --
I am on the technical committee of an amateur
repeater club. A club in the next county has
approached us to ask about sharing one of our 2m
receive sites with them. It's a commercial site and
we are there at the pleasure of the owner, who is
--- Micheal Salem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joe Montierth wrote:
What I would like to know is what law or rule is
being
broken by taping conversations heard on
non-telephone type channels?
Anyone have a citation, or is this just urban
legend?
I know it used
Here's another link to a court case where a federal
judge determined that it would not be illegal to
divulge the contents of most radio transmissions. In
part it reads thusly:
Chapter 119 generally prohibits the interception of
any oral or electronic communication,
which, by definition, includes
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
