On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Malthe Borch mbo...@gmail.com wrote:
3) Can we have 1 template per file?
You want to have them named somehow then? What sort of syntax are
you thinking about it?
Isn't that exactly what macros give you via define and use?
Hanno
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Malthe Borch mbo...@gmail.com wrote:
Are there any impediments to releasing the trunk of repoze.zope2?
According to the changelog
(http://svn.repoze.org/repoze.zope2/trunk/CHANGES.txt) there are no
changes on trunk.
Since WSGI support is available in Zope 2.13,
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Danny Navarro j...@dannynavarro.net wrote:
Thanks for your hints. I missed plone.folder, I'll have a careful look
at it before redoing something that has already been done.
The plone.folder code is quite complicated, as it supports different
ordering strategies
Hi.
We have an application which supports both HTTP and HTTPS. If the user
visits the site via https:// he should stay on that protocol and as
such all links should be generated accordingly.
We do the SSL handling in Nginx in front of the bfg application. So
the application always gets a
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote:
Yeah, the warning is a wart, but what's the problem?
The problem is that installing his tarball with setuptools puts
everything at the top level. import ImageFile works, but import
PIL or any from PIL import ImageFile
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 3:14 AM, Alex Clark acl...@aclark.net wrote:
A couple questions:
(1) Just curious have you seen any issues with PIL and Zope 2
along these lines:
04:45 wiggy argh, PIL 1.1.7 breaks Zope
06:42 aclark wiggy: how?
06:42 wiggy aclark: it includes an
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Damien Baty damien.b...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 29/01/10 09:46, Hanno Schlichting a écrit :
Personally I'd suggest to use Babel instead of zope.i18n. [...]
I will certainly take a look at it. Thanks. What is the status of your
zope.babel [1] package: any plan
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Damien Baty damien.b...@gmail.com wrote:
I must be missing something, here. Let's restrict the use case to
template i18n. In my BFG app, I use Chameleon. And Chameleon is pretty
tied up to zope.i18n (cf. chameleon.core.i18n), isn't it?
Ah right. Chameleon has
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote:
Miuler wrote:
Hi, will work chameleon on google appengine?
in future?
Sorry, unknown.
I think it's possible to make that work without all too much work, but
it doesn't work right now.
Basically the cached compiled
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 7:21 PM, Nathan Van Gheem vangh...@gmail.com wrote:
The page renders completely fine with those actions missing.
I stepped into the code a bit and the plone.contentactions viewlet isn't
even called when repoze.vhm is used.
Hhm, the only slightly funny thing about this
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 7:37 PM, Iain Duncaniaindun...@telus.net wrote:
Just wondering if anyone manages to run bfg apps from within plone, and
if so, do they have any examples up online? I'd love to be able to pass
traversal from the plone-zope publisher to the repoze publisher, but I'm
very
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Douglas Mayledoug...@openplans.org wrote:
I've been doing some testing of a new site, and I've used repoze.who
and repoze.what for authentication, and authorization respectively. I
did notice one unusual behavior with AuthTktCookiePlugin, however. If
I log in
Chris Rossi wrote:
While I think you're probably right, I know for a fact there are plenty
of templates in the wild that assume you can use attribute syntax for
dictionary lookup. At least on the stuff I'm working on.
Maybe add deprecation warnings to the next release and actually yank it
Chris McDonough wrote:
I added some more test coverage on the trunk. It's still pretty poor right
now.
Awesome!
I'll try to improve the coverage after getting some more documentation
for my latest changes in.
Hanno
___
Repoze-dev mailing list
Chris McDonough wrote:
I think this package is becoming less repoze.zope2 than some other more
experimental system. Which is fine. But there's no way I'm going to be able
to give people help with it on IRC or the maillist when it breaks because
they're using an API that we removed. I
Chris McDonough wrote:
On 5/9/09 9:12 AM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
It'd be nice if there was a way to name the files that meant people
won't accidentally commit a bunch of compiled .py files that may then
end up conflicting later.
Maybe there could be a mode to compile template files directly
Malthe Borch wrote:
As a general improvement (in terms of clarity) and as part of the
efforts of getting Chameleon working on GAE, I've begun reworking the
compilation stage.
Yeah!
3) If the ``CHAMELEON_STATIC`` flag is enabled, compile into
one-method-fits-all-arguments render methods for
Hanno Schlichting hanno...@hannosch.eu added the comment:
Since I added that particular dependency I should take care of this issue. Only
question I have:
Do we really still care about Python 2.4 support? Especially for profiling the
2.5 libraries are quite
different and much better
Iain Duncan wrote:
Hi folks, I'm new here and was wondering if there is a good Repoze.bfg
to Grok comparison page anywhere. If not, I'd like to recommend that it
would be a great addition to the docs. I know there is a brief
comparison up there, but to someone like me who is experienced in
Chris McDonough wrote:
I just tried running the c-free version of on Windows for the first time
and
ran into an issue where zope.1i8nmessageid required compilation.
Hhm, which version of the package did you use? At least for 3.4.3 there
are binary Windows eggs available for Python 2.4 to
Hi.
Got a brainstorming question for the repoze.zope2 folks.
Currently repoze.zope2 reuses the Zope2 ZPublisher request object pretty
much directly. This is nice for full backwards compatibility, which has
been a primary concern during its initial development.
At some point in the Zope2 or at
Paul Everitt wrote:
On Dec 9, 2008, at 10:15 AM, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Tom Gross wrote:
is there any repoze-component for catching zope2-exceptions except
cgitb which is unsuitable for production environments. omitting cgitb
results in a white page which isn't too good eighter
22 matches
Mail list logo
