RE: ARCserve vs Retrospect Server Backup

2001-03-08 Thread Kraut, David
rom: Ben Eastwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 5:42 PM To: retro-talk Subject: Re: ARCserve vs Retrospect Server Backup David- Are you also using Open File Manager, and if so does it work OK in Win2k with Services for Mac? ( I know this is not really a retros

Re: ARCserve vs Retrospect Server Backup

2001-03-08 Thread NetHead
ct's capabilities to handle backing up NT servers. I installed Retrospect on my NT server and have not regretted it for one second. Kudos to Dantz for making such a great product! So... when are you guys going to add support for Netware? :-) Wasn't it Tom Roth who once said... >Subj

RE: ARCserve vs Retrospect Server Backup

2001-03-08 Thread Adam Cohen
ber-doctors.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ben Eastwood Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 5:42 PM To: retro-talk Subject: Re: ARCserve vs Retrospect Server Backup David- Are you also using Open File Manager, and if so does it work OK in Win2

Re: ARCserve vs Retrospect Server Backup

2001-03-07 Thread Ben Eastwood
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2001 14:41:46 -0800 > To: retro-talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: ARCserve vs Retrospect Server Backup > > David- > Are you also using Open File Manager, and if so does it work OK in Win2k > with Services for Mac? ( I know t

Re: ARCserve vs Retrospect Server Backup

2001-03-07 Thread Irena Solomon
Hi all, Note that Retrospect is able to back up *most* open files. Most database files though will be inaccessible to other application while they are in use by the database. Regards, Irena > From: Ben Eastwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: ARCserve vs Retrospect Server Backu

Re: ARCserve vs Retrospect Server Backup

2001-03-07 Thread Ben Eastwood
TED]> > Reply-To: "retro-talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2001 17:11:38 -0500 > To: 'retro-talk' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: ARCserve vs Retrospect Server Backup > > I use it to back up a mix of (20) NT4 and Win2000 Servers. The r

RE: ARCserve vs Retrospect Server Backup

2001-03-07 Thread Kraut, David
I use it to back up a mix of (20) NT4 and Win2000 Servers. The retrospect program is running on a 2000 Server and works fine. I've also used ArcServe in the past and wild horses couldn't drag me back to that nightmare of a product!! :) David Kraut -Original Message- From: [EMA

Re: ARCserve vs Retrospect Server Backup

2001-03-07 Thread matt barkdull
My department has two DLT4000 drives, one connected to a Mac and the other to a PC. The one connected to the PC is an autochanger. Both work flawlessly with the current versions of Retrospect and OS's on the machines. We switched from Arcserve on the PC to Retrospect and have never looked ba

Re: ARCserve vs Retrospect Server Backup

2001-03-07 Thread Tom Roth
> Ben Eastwood wrote: > > I have lots to comment on this thread! I Love Retro and ditched Arcserve for > Retro about six months ago. I had used it for years to back up Macs, and now > I'm using it for about ten NT servers, Including one that has over 160 GB of > Drive space, a couple that run MS

Re: ARCserve vs Retrospect Server Backup

2001-03-07 Thread Ben Eastwood
EMAIL PROTECTED] > From: "Stephen Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: "retro-talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2001 12:45:58 -0500 > To: "'retro-talk'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: ARCserve vs Retrospe

Re: ARCserve vs Retrospect Server Backup

2001-03-07 Thread Jim Cobb
ust put out might fix the problem but I don't have the time right now to experiment with it. >Irena Solomon >Dantz Technical Support >925.253.3050 > >Try our new Searchable Knowledgebase at: >http://partners.dantz.com:591/faq/ > > >> From: Jim Cobb <[EMAI

Re: ARCserve vs Retrospect Server Backup

2001-03-07 Thread Irena Solomon
iliation with that package, I'm just making it known it > exists and may help guys looking for SQL, Exchange or Open file backup. > > Steve > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf > Subject: Re: ARCserve vs Retros

RE: ARCserve vs Retrospect Server Backup

2001-03-07 Thread Stephen Jones
ng for SQL, Exchange or Open file backup. Steve -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Irena Solomon Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 11:59 AM To: retro-talk Subject: Re: ARCserve vs Retrospect Server Backup Hi Jim, Thanks for the feedback! I just

Re: ARCserve vs Retrospect Server Backup

2001-03-07 Thread Jim Cobb
On Wednesday, March 7, 2001 10:47 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Jim Cobb wrote: >> >> I am using Retro Windows to backup a HP LH4 NT4 server with >> no problems. I cannot upgrade to the latest version (5.15) as >> for some reason the support for the HP DLT drive was dropped >> in that versi

Re: ARCserve vs Retrospect Server Backup

2001-03-07 Thread Irena Solomon
eatures. Best Regards, Irena Solomon Dantz Technical Support 925.253.3050 Try our new Searchable Knowledgebase at: http://partners.dantz.com:591/faq/ > From: Jim Cobb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: ARCserve vs Retrospect Server Backup > > I am using Retro Windows to backu

Re: ARCserve vs Retrospect Server Backup

2001-03-07 Thread Tom Roth
> Jim Cobb wrote: > > I am using Retro Windows to backup a HP LH4 NT4 server with > no problems. I cannot upgrade to the latest version (5.15) as > for some reason the support for the HP DLT drive was dropped > in that version. Jim, Appreciate your comments. Which HP DLT drive is that? We're

Re: ARCserve vs Retrospect Server Backup

2001-03-07 Thread Jim Cobb
I am using Retro Windows to backup a HP LH4 NT4 server with no problems. I cannot upgrade to the latest version (5.15) as for some reason the support for the HP DLT drive was dropped in that version. But 5.11 seems to be running with no problems so it's no big deal. A big dissapointment is the