Hello,
I was working with git-svn, and trying to post a diff further down the patch
stack. E.g
A (remotes/git-svn)
B
D
E (HEAD)
I want to post the diff containing commits D and E, but excluding A. When
working with a pure git workflow, I'll typically use the --parent or
--revision-range
BTW, this is with RBTools 0.5.7.
Walt
From: reviewboard@googlegroups.com [mailto:reviewboard@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Javins, Walt
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 12:36 AM
To: reviewboard@googlegroups.com
Subject: rbt post + git-svn potential bug:
Hello,
I was working with git-svn, and
Walt,
Can you try with the code in rbtools git (the master branch)?. We've
significantly redone the revision code for the upcoming 0.6 release, and it
should work much better with git-svn. The syntax for revisions has changed
a bit for 0.6. Revisions are now passed as arguments, so your command
On 02/24/2014 08:51 PM, Tamer Afify wrote:
Thanks Christian Stephen for fixing this. It really made me hit my
head for a while.
My corporate un-organized ldap directory shows that my reviewboard users
are scattered under different OUs. How can I configure authentication to
allow all my
Hi,
Seems RB 2.0 has a lot of cool features and I want to give it a try. But
after I upgraded it, the review board toke a very long time to load and
finally a 500 error showed up. Any idea what`s going on? I also checked
my apache2 log file, it`s nothing there.
Anyway for to downgrade it to
Is there anything in /tmp/reviewboard.log ?
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
---
You received this message
Sorry, nothing in the reviewboard`s log
On Tuesday, February 25, 2014 12:32:08 PM UTC-5, Bruce Cran wrote:
Is there anything in /tmp/reviewboard.log ?
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons:
No log file that`s something bother me the most...Any idea how to fix this?
Is it possible for me to downgrade to 1.7.21?
On Tuesday, February 25, 2014 12:32:08 PM UTC-5, Bruce Cran wrote:
Is there anything in /tmp/reviewboard.log ?
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at
I just tried to install the 2.0 beta3 again, and during the installation, I
found few warnings(no error) may help.
They are:
Running Whoosh-2.6.0/setup.py -q bdist_egg --dist-dir
/tmp/easy_install-soGWSL/Whoosh-2.6.0/egg-dist-tmp-_iMeAQ
warning: no files found matching '*.txt' under directory
After the reinstallation, I also got some error log from the apache2.
[error] [client 10.50.12.48] mod_wsgi (pid=2238): Exception occurred
processing WSGI script
'/var/www/reviews.example.com/htdocs/reviewboard.wsgi'., referer:
http://10.50.12.159:81/dashboard/
[Tue Feb 25 19:16:19 2014]
That error log shows you're running Django 1.4.x under Apache, and not
1.6.2. What version of Python did you install with?
Christian
On Tuesday, February 25, 2014, Allen zhangsan8...@gmail.com wrote:
After the reinstallation, I also got some error log from the apache2.
[error] [client
Python 2.7.3
On Tuesday, February 25, 2014 2:37:38 PM UTC-5, Christian Hammond wrote:
That error log shows you're running Django 1.4.x under Apache, and not
1.6.2. What version of Python did you install with?
Christian
On Tuesday, February 25, 2014, Allen zhangs...@gmail.com javascript:
I also checked the django`s version, it`s
django.VERSION
(1, 6, 2, 'final', 0)
any idea why I am running 1.4.x and how to fix it? Thanks!
On Tuesday, February 25, 2014 2:37:38 PM UTC-5, Christian Hammond wrote:
That error log shows you're running Django 1.4.x under Apache, and not
1.6.2.
Can you show me the full output plus command line you used for upgrading
Review Board? There is definitely something wrong with your install.
Christian
On Tuesday, February 25, 2014, Allen zhangsan8...@gmail.com wrote:
Python 2.7.3
On Tuesday, February 25, 2014 2:37:38 PM UTC-5, Christian
The upgrade command I used is
sudo easy_install \
-f http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/2.0/ \
-U ReviewBoard
And for the output, I am able to put it here, it`s already gone. There were
few warnings in the output but no errors. And finally it shows completed.
All
import django
django.__file__
'/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Django-1.6.2-py2.7.egg/django/__init__.pyc'
import reviewboard
reviewboard.__file__
'/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ReviewBoard-2.0beta3-py2.7.egg/reviewboard/__init__.pyc'
On Tuesday, February 25, 2014 3:02:08 PM
Hi Allen,
On Tuesday, 25 February 2014 17:11:53 UTC, Allen wrote:
Hi,
Seems RB 2.0 has a lot of cool features and I want to give it a try. But
after I upgraded it, the review board toke a very long time to load and
finally a 500 error showed up. Any idea what`s going on? I also checked
Hi all,
I've just upgraded a Debian Wheezy VM to the latest beta and I'm hitting an
issue straight off the bat:
http://dpaste.com/1658355/
Context:
- We're using beta2 on another VM, mysql backend. Running fine.
- I cloned the VM and upgraded the new VM's Review Board using recommended
Hello there,
I installed ReviewBoard for a demo in my company, when I tried to declare
an smtp email server, with a specific password (a paste from windows to
UNIX added an infortunate \u200b char at the end of my password, crashing
Python scripts...
I would like to reset the user/password or
On Tuesday, February 25, 2014, timc timcuss...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Allen,
On Tuesday, 25 February 2014 17:11:53 UTC, Allen wrote:
Hi,
Seems RB 2.0 has a lot of cool features and I want to give it a try. But
after I upgraded it, the review board toke a very long time to load and
finally a
Yeah, I restarted the apache2 server after the install is completed. So you
mean I should not restart the server?
On Tuesday, February 25, 2014 3:46:43 PM UTC-5, Christian Hammond wrote:
On Tuesday, February 25, 2014, timc timcu...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
Hi Allen,
On Tuesday, 25
Hi Tim,
That's concerning. This should only be able to happen if accessing the site
configuration data throws an exception, which shouldn't happen.
What was the repro case? Just going to a URL?
Try this and see what happens:
$ rb-site manage /path/to/site shell
from
No, you should. Not restarting can result in an older version of the code
being used.
Did you restart it after doing 'rb-site upgrade', or just after the
'easy_install -U' ?
Okay, so Python 2.7 is being used for the server and for your command line,
which is good. Means things are in sync there.
I made a mistake... I never ran the rb-site upgrade... Problem solved, and
I think it`s better to mention that use rb-site upgrade after the install
is done. Anyway, thank you so much!!!
On Tuesday, February 25, 2014 3:56:50 PM UTC-5, Christian Hammond wrote:
No, you should. Not restarting
On 02/25/2014 04:15 PM, Allen wrote:
I made a mistake... I never ran the rb-site upgrade... Problem solved,
and I think it`s better to mention that use rb-site upgrade after the
install is done. Anyway, thank you so much!!!
FWIW, I'm currently working on a patch for systemd enabled systems
Glad to hear that, thanks!
On Tuesday, February 25, 2014 4:19:22 PM UTC-5, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 02/25/2014 04:15 PM, Allen wrote:
I made a mistake... I never ran the rb-site upgrade... Problem solved,
and I think it`s better to mention that use rb-site upgrade after the
install
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Stephen Gallagher
step...@gallagherhome.com wrote:
On 02/25/2014 04:15 PM, Allen wrote:
I made a mistake... I never ran the rb-site upgrade... Problem solved,
and I think it`s better to mention that use rb-site upgrade after the
install is done. Anyway,
How do you fixed this issue? I am encountering the same issue now. Thanks!
On Wednesday, November 28, 2012 4:13:32 AM UTC-5, shaheer va wrote:
I got it fixed by modifying smtplib.py
On Tuesday, 27 November 2012 16:45:29 UTC+5:30, shaheer va wrote:
here is the log file content
2012-11-27
I installed postfix on the RB server and use it as a relay to the main mail
server.
On Feb 25, 2014 5:57 PM, Allen zhangsan8...@gmail.com wrote:
How do you fixed this issue? I am encountering the same issue now. Thanks!
On Wednesday, November 28, 2012 4:13:32 AM UTC-5, shaheer va wrote:
I
A variant of the traceback still manifests in github’s master rbtools:
$ rbt --version
RBTools 0.6 alpha 0 (dev)
$ rbt post -r 16600 --debug f27b632..260cdd7
DEBUG:root:Checking for a Subversion repository...
DEBUG:root:Running: svn info --non-interactive
DEBUG:root:Command exited with rc 1:
Hi Christian,
Here is the whole output of failure :
easy_install ReviewBoard==1.6.12
Searching for ReviewBoard==1.6.12
Reading https://pypi.python.org/simple/ReviewBoard/
Download error on https://pypi.python.org/simple/ReviewBoard/: [Errno 1]
_ssl.c:504: error:14090086:SSL
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3265 by f...@esss.com.br: reviewboard with apache mod_proxy
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3265
*** READ THIS BEFORE POSTING!
***
*** You must complete this form in its entirety, or your bug report will
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3266 by akisk...@gmail.com: Wrong URLs in many places which
result in 404 pages
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3266
*** READ THIS BEFORE POSTING!
***
*** You must complete this form in its entirety,
Updates:
Status: NeedInfo
Comment #1 on issue 3265 by trowb...@gmail.com: reviewboard with apache
mod_proxy
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3265
This definitely looks like it isn't picking up the server name from the
settings. Did you just change that
34 matches
Mail list logo
