Re: Logging is not working When failure happens?

2013-01-03 Thread Christian Hammond
Hi, Are there any logs at all other than the rotation information in that file? Are you certain logging is turned on in settings? Is the log file's ownership set to allow the Apache server to write to it? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board -

Re: negative outgoing review

2013-01-03 Thread satish singh
Hi David, Its causing a problem, the diff is not getting uploaded after this change through GUI, have any idea on this. On Tuesday, 18 December 2012 16:39:18 UTC+5:30, satish singh wrote: Thanks a lot David, it worked. -Satish On Monday, 17 December 2012 11:07:57 UTC+5:30, David

Re: Logging is not working When failure happens?

2013-01-03 Thread Thangappan M
I missed to enable debug in settings_local.py file. Now the logging is happening for the repository creation, and raising review request. but not for the LDAP authentication. LDAP log in is not working and no error or debug statement is printing in the log file. Also checked in the

1.6.13 to 1.7.1 upgrade issues: ERROR (EXTERNAL IP): Internal Server Error: /r/213/

2013-01-03 Thread Brian Armstrong
Since upgrading to 1.7.1 all new reviews have been running into this issue (backtrace below). I did some digging into the traceback that was generated and found the following: reviewboard/scmtools/hg.py line 215, the version variable being passed to parse_version is None. This is coming from

Testing 1.7.1 on Fedora 18

2013-01-03 Thread pfee
Hi Stephen, After running rb-site install and visiting the website, I get errors about a couple of directories not being writeable.  The web page helpfully suggests a couple of chmod -R commands.  However on Fedora the SELinux profile for the httpd process prevents writing regardless of unix

Upgaded from 1.6.3 to 1.7.1 - Styles missing

2013-01-03 Thread Brian
Hello, I upgraded from v1.6.3 to v1.7.1 this morning using the following steps: easy_install -U ReviewBoard rb-site upgrade /var/www/reviewboard /etc/init.d/memcached restart service apache2 restart then found that I had to do: chown -R www-data /var/www/reviewboard/htdocs/media/ext

Re: Upgaded from 1.6.3 to 1.7.1 - Styles missing

2013-01-03 Thread Brian Armstrong
I believe it is htdocs with an S on the end. Alias /static /var/www/reviewboard/htdocs/static I ran into the same problem. On Thursday, January 3, 2013 10:15:13 AM UTC-7, Brian wrote: Hello, I upgraded from v1.6.3 to v1.7.1 this morning using the following steps: easy_install -U

Re: Upgaded from 1.6.3 to 1.7.1 - Styles missing

2013-01-03 Thread Brian
You were absolutely correct. Man, what a dumb mistake. :D Thanks for catching that! On Thursday, January 3, 2013 10:26:19 AM UTC-7, Brian Armstrong wrote: I believe it is htdocs with an S on the end. Alias /static /var/www/reviewboard/htdocs/static I ran into the same problem. On

Problems accessing Bazaar repository after upgrading to v1.7.1.

2013-01-03 Thread Brian
Hopefully this question isn't as dumb as my last one! After upgrading from v1.6.3 where we were successfully using Bazaar and ReviewBoard together, it seems we can no longer connect to Bazaar through ReviewBoard. I first noticed this when trying to create a new review and I got this error:

Re: Testing 1.7.1 on Fedora 18

2013-01-03 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Thu 03 Jan 2013 11:47:06 AM EST, p...@talk21.com wrote: Hi Stephen, After running rb-site install and visiting the website, I get errors about a couple of directories not being writeable. The web page helpfully suggests a couple of chmod -R commands. However on Fedora the SELinux profile

Re: Problems accessing Bazaar repository after upgrading to v1.7.1.

2013-01-03 Thread Brian
Update: I found this in my apache2 error.log. A lot of warnings, but since it has to do with ssh, I thought it might be relevant. [Thu Jan 03 18:56:51 2013] [error] /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Djblets-0.7.8-py2.6.egg/djblets/extensions/base.py:467: UserWarning: Module _mysql

Re: Problems accessing Bazaar repository after upgrading to v1.7.1.

2013-01-03 Thread Brian
And one more update. I set DEBUG=True in settings_local.py and saw this in reviewboard.log 2013-01-03 13:23:02,184 - DEBUG - Logging to /var/www/reviewboard/logs/reviewboard.log with a minimum level of DEBUG 2013-01-03 13:23:07,617 - DEBUG - BZRTool: Attempting ssh connection with host:

Re: Problems accessing Bazaar repository after upgrading to v1.7.1.

2013-01-03 Thread Christian Hammond
Hi Brian, We thunk out to rbssh for all our SSH communication. It acts as a wrapper. Somehow, the Python path is ending up all wrong when it gets there, preventing settings from being imported correctly. What version of bzr is this? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review

Re: 1.6.13 to 1.7.1 upgrade issues: ERROR (EXTERNAL IP): Internal Server Error: /r/213/

2013-01-03 Thread Christian Hammond
Hi Brian, Just to sanity check, when you run that manually, is it also using Python 2.6? It seems weird that we'd be able to import that file but not get the version. In my copy here, it's nothing but a straight-forward variable assignment in a file called __version__.py. It'd be interesting to

Re: Problems accessing Bazaar repository after upgrading to v1.7.1.

2013-01-03 Thread Brian
We're (for now) using 2.1.4. My plan was to update that this week also, I just happened to start my list of upgrades with ReviewBoard. Thanks, Brian On Thursday, January 3, 2013 2:37:14 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote: Hi Brian, We thunk out to rbssh for all our SSH communication. It acts

Re: Logging is not working When failure happens?

2013-01-03 Thread Christian Hammond
Hi, If logging is now working, and you're not seeing any logging failures, then we're not hitting any error cases in the logging module. To get more information, you'd have to add your own logging statements, in order to trace where things go wrong. If you feel comfortable at all doing this, you

RE: a couple of issues post 1.7.1 upgrade

2013-01-03 Thread Dave Preston
Hey Christian, This is on lighttpd. Here's the output; 01-03 13:45 root DEBUG['/usr/bin/rbssh', 'svnpoller@svn', 'svnserve', '-t'] 01-03 13:45 root DEBUGPID 28511 01-03 13:45 root DEBUG!!! svn, svnpoller, ['svnserve', '-t'] 01-03 13:45 root

Re: 1.6.13 to 1.7.1 upgrade issues: ERROR (EXTERNAL IP): Internal Server Error: /r/213/

2013-01-03 Thread Brian Armstrong
Correct, Python 2.6.6. Everything else works, is also the weird thing. I hardcoded a version number if it came back as None (I guess I could add some logging to that if statement too) and it just keeps going. It generates the diffs fine, all the other integration options seem to work. So I

Re: Problems accessing Bazaar repository after upgrading to v1.7.1.

2013-01-03 Thread Brian
I have now upgraded to Bazaar 2.5.1 in case it helped, but it looks like I still have the same behavior. Thanks, Brian -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/

Re: Problems accessing Bazaar repository after upgrading to v1.7.1.

2013-01-03 Thread Christian Hammond
I'll play with it some here. I don't suppose your bzr repo is public, so I can test against it? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Brian phxgat...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: Problems accessing Bazaar repository after upgrading to v1.7.1.

2013-01-03 Thread Brian
No, it's not, sorry. If there's anything I can do to help your testing, I'd be happy to do what I can. Thanks, Brian On Thursday, January 3, 2013 3:44:17 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote: I'll play with it some here. I don't suppose your bzr repo is public, so I can test against it?

Reviewboard with Perforce repository that uses an SSL connection

2013-01-03 Thread ralleye red
I've installed ReviewBoard 1.6.13 with Perforce 2012.2 and it contains about 50 review requests that use the Perforce repository. Now, the Perforce(P4) administrator has introduced SSL encryption for P4 connection. P4 connection string has the prefix of *ssl:* After the introduction of *ssl*

Re: Problems accessing Bazaar repository after upgrading to v1.7.1.

2013-01-03 Thread Christian Hammond
Hi Brian, What kind of Python loader are you using? mod_wsgi, mod_python, fastcgi? What happens when you run rbssh from the command line on that server? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On

Re: Problems accessing Bazaar repository after upgrading to v1.7.1.

2013-01-03 Thread Brian
Hello again, I'm using mod_wsgi. And when I do rbssh bazaar@servername I get access with no errors. Thanks, Brian -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/

Re: Problems accessing Bazaar repository after upgrading to v1.7.1.

2013-01-03 Thread Christian Hammond
Hi Brian, One more thing to confirm. Hopefully I can get you some commands to run soon that will provide more useful info. What distro are you using, and is SELinux enabled? Trying to determine what's preventing the resulting process from getting the PYTHONPATH environment... Can you also

Re: Testing 1.7.1 on Fedora 18

2013-01-03 Thread Christian Hammond
Hi, On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 8:47 AM, p...@talk21.com wrote: Hi Stephen, After running rb-site install and visiting the website, I get errors about a couple of directories not being writeable. The web page helpfully suggests a couple of chmod -R commands. However on Fedora the SELinux

Re: Problems accessing Bazaar repository after upgrading to v1.7.1.

2013-01-03 Thread The Coxes
I think it's on Ubuntu 10.04 and I don't think SELinux is enabled, but I will confirm later this evening or tomorrow when I'm back in the office. I'll also get the contents of settings_local.py for you then. Thanks, Brian On Jan 3, 2013 5:20 PM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: Hi

Re: a couple of issues post 1.7.1 upgrade

2013-01-03 Thread Christian Hammond
At what point during the log is it asking for the password? It looks like it's connected. Maybe it's svnserve asking for the password? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at

Re: Problems accessing Bazaar repository after upgrading to v1.7.1.

2013-01-03 Thread Brian
Confirming - I'm on Ubuntu 10.04.3 LTS, no SELinux appears to be installed. the contents of the /conf/settings_local.py file are: # Site-specific configuration settings for Review Board # Definitions of these settings can be found at # http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/ref/settings/ #

Re: Reviewboard with Perforce repository that uses an SSL connection

2013-01-03 Thread Gayle Ribeiro
Hi David, I'm facing the same issue - However I'm using Perforce 2012.1. Please address the following queries: 1. Does ReviewBoard support SSL connections to Perforce 2012.1? 2. Do let me know when to expect ReviewBoard v1.7.2 release? Are release dates for 1.7.2 (and later) published on a

RE: a couple of issues post 1.7.1 upgrade

2013-01-03 Thread Dave Preston
All those process_stdin is where it prompts for the password. I don't get why it seems to connect with the key ok and then fall back to password, if that's what is actually happening. -Original Message- From: reviewboard@googlegroups.com [mailto:reviewboard@googlegroups.com] On Behalf

Re: Reviewboard with Perforce repository that uses an SSL connection

2013-01-03 Thread David Trowbridge
The ssl: syntax is currently not supported for any perforce release. I think it will be doable but it will probably require manually installing p4python in order to enable SSL support in the library. We don't have a firm schedule for 1.7.2 but it shouldn't be too long. The release notes will

Re: a couple of issues post 1.7.1 upgrade

2013-01-03 Thread Christian Hammond
If it's process_stdin, it sounds like it's svnserve asking for the password, meaning the SSH authentication was successful. I assume it's doing this in the original log you showed as well, and the lack of stdin was causing the connection to be closed unexpectedly. I don't know why it'd be

Issue 2844 in reviewboard: Admin templates are broken

2013-01-03 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2844 by pmi...@gmail.com: Admin templates are broken http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2844 * NOTE: For customer support, please post to * * reviewbo...@googlegroups.com

Issue 2845 in reviewboard: Reviewers marked as required, even if Groups are used

2013-01-03 Thread reviewboard
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 2845 by adam.col...@gmail.com: Reviewers marked as required, even if Groups are used http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2845 What version are you running? 1.7.1 What's the URL of the page containing

Re: Issue 2841 in reviewboard: Using non-standard ssh port (!=22) for connecting to git repository

2013-01-03 Thread reviewboard
Comment #1 on issue 2841 by mario.zi...@gmail.com: Using non-standard ssh port (!=22) for connecting to git repository http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2841 After some more digging, I actually found that the problem is not with schemeless_url_re. Problem seams to be

Re: Issue 2841 in reviewboard: Using non-standard ssh port (!=22) for connecting to git repository

2013-01-03 Thread reviewboard
Comment #2 on issue 2841 by mario.zi...@gmail.com: Using non-standard ssh port (!=22) for connecting to git repository http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2841 Patch submitted for review: http://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/3712/ -- You received this message because you are

Re: Issue 2841 in reviewboard: Using non-standard ssh port (!=22) for connecting to git repository

2013-01-03 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: PendingReview Labels: Component-SSH Comment #3 on issue 2841 by trowb...@gmail.com: Using non-standard ssh port (!=22) for connecting to git repository http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2841 (No comment was entered for this change.) --

Re: Issue 2842 in reviewboard: Jump to search box does not work in 1.7

2013-01-03 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Labels: Component-Search Comment #1 on issue 2842 by trowb...@gmail.com: Jump to search box does not work in 1.7 http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2842 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to

Re: Issue 2843 in reviewboard: Extensions' 'config/' and 'db/' admin links don't work when SITE_ROOT isn't '/'

2013-01-03 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Labels: Component-Extensions Comment #1 on issue 2843 by trowb...@gmail.com: Extensions' 'config/' and 'db/' admin links don't work when SITE_ROOT isn't '/' http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2843 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received

Re: Issue 2845 in reviewboard: Reviewers marked as required, even if Groups are used

2013-01-03 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: NotABug Comment #1 on issue 2845 by chip...@gmail.com: Reviewers marked as required, even if Groups are used http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2845 The Reviewers is a heading, of which Groups and People fall under. The asterisk means that there

Re: Issue 2844 in reviewboard: Admin templates are broken

2013-01-03 Thread reviewboard
Updates: Status: NeedInfo Comment #1 on issue 2844 by chip...@gmail.com: Admin templates are broken http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2844 The template it's trying to reach is part of Django. Sounds like something is still busted with your Django install. If