Is the new server using pysvn or subvertpy?
-David
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:24 PM, bhagwat mane manebhag...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi All,
I am getting this error while adding or updating SVN repository (which is
in *HTTPS* mode) in reviewboard application. It works for *HTTP* but not
for
Both
On Wednesday, June 11, 2014 12:54:32 PM UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge wrote:
Is the new server using pysvn or subvertpy?
-David
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:24 PM, bhagwat mane maneb...@gmail.com
javascript: wrote:
Hi All,
I am getting this error while adding or updating SVN
Can you try removing subvertpy and running with only the pysvn backend?
-David
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 1:04 AM, bhagwat mane manebhag...@gmail.com wrote:
Both
On Wednesday, June 11, 2014 12:54:32 PM UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge wrote:
Is the new server using pysvn or subvertpy?
-David
Removed subvertpy, restart apache2 now getting error as *u'failures'*.
- Bhagwat
On Wednesday, June 11, 2014 1:40:38 PM UTC+5:30, David Trowbridge wrote:
Can you try removing subvertpy and running with only the pysvn backend?
-David
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 1:04 AM, bhagwat mane
Thanks Christian,
See the attached file for the debug output. There is nothing special about
the repo setup: I don't have any branches. Everything up to changeset
100:79c09fdfad23 is pushed into the main repo. I changed a file with
changeset: 101:1170d2410ead and then did a rbt post. To say it
Hello.
We go into a strange situation where issue - drop, resolve buttons are not
working consistently. We have a review with 10 images attached with over
160 issues(76 open), when I(owner of review) try to drop/resolve/add
comment to an open issue nothing is happening, reviewboard is not
Hi Christian,
Thanks for your help!
I'm trying to generate a squashed diff of multiple commits by specifying
first and last commits like this:
hg diff --rev 'f0c92cb17217::5db37ca696a4'
Adding the --git flag doesn't change the output.
Is there a way to create review requests based on such
Hello,
I set up review board in my Ubuntu VM with success I can see the review
board administration from my local machine(Mac OS). We use perforce for our
development, when I try to post a review trough a terminal but I got the
following error:
rbt post -o -d --p4-port $P4PORT CLNUMBER
Hi,
For the past couple of days I've been working on a Juju[1] Charm for Review
Board, which I'm happy to announce has just been approved and released into
the official Charm Store[2].
For those of you who aren't aware, Juju is a service orchestration
technology which makes it really easy to
Hey Adam,
Very cool! Anything you need from us for this?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com
On June 11, 2014 at 1:20:36 PM, adam.coll...@gmail.com (adam.coll...@gmail.com)
wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
What version of Review Board is this? And what version of what browser?
Can you check the browser’s JavaScript console log when you attempt to modify
an issue and see if any errors appear?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
Hi Christian,
It wouldn't hurt to get some eye balls on the code. Very much in its infancy
but I have grand plans to add more awesomeness so want a solid starting point.
I made the logo in SVG by hand copying the one on the site. Is that ok? Is
there an official logo you'd like me to use
Hey Adam,
Review Board 2.1 will have a new repository selector that will make it very
easy to configure repositories on supported hosting services. Right now, I’m
targeting GitHub for development, but we’ll bring support to Bitbucket pretty
soon too. This is all still very young though. (Also
This is a known problem with cert validation right now.
We’re putting out a release by Friday at the latest (hoping to do later today
or tomorrow) that will fix this.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. -
I got working by adding:
os.environ['P4USER'] = to reviewboard.wsgi
On Wednesday, June 11, 2014 3:47:30 PM UTC-4, Diego Velasquez wrote:
Hello,
I set up review board in my Ubuntu VM with success I can see the review
board administration from my local machine(Mac OS). We use perforce
Hi there,
I am been trying to run rb post inside p4 by creating a custom tool which
does the following:
application = /usr/local/bin/rbt
arguments = post -d --server=http://myserver --p4-client=$c --p4-port=$p
--username=myuser --password=mypassword %C
But for some reason the terminal
We are using v1.7.7.1. We tried IE10 and Chrome v35.0.1916.15 .
Console log :
POST
https://xxx/reviewboard/api/review-requests/42036/reviews/67932/file-attachment-comments/
400 (BAD REQUEST) jquery-1.8.2.min.cfa9051cc0b0.js:2
Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read property 'id' of undefined
Hi Yugesh,
First thing I’d ask that you do is upgrade to something modern. 1.7.7.1 is from
April of 2013, and we’ve made a lot of fixes in that time.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com
Upgrading would be big thing for us considering the other priorities, but
we do have it in our plan. What do you think caused this? We have around 13
new files and 13 old files as of now on same review and over 70 issues
open. Does size of review failing this? Reviews seem to be working fine
I can’t imagine what would have caused this aside from some issue on your
server.
Can you open the Network tab in Chrome’s developer tools, repeat a request, and
show what the resulting payload looks like?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board -
Yes see below.
[image:
chrome-devtools://devtools/bundled/devtools.html?dockSide=undockedtoolbarColor=rgba(223,223,223,1)textColor=rgba(0,0,0,1)can_dock=trueupdateAppcache]
file-attachment-comments/
/reviewboard/api/review-requests/42036/reviews/68007
POST
400
BAD REQUEST
I need to see the actual response payload.
Is the failure only on file attachments? Do you ever see it for diffs?
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com
On June 11, 2014 at 3:05:51 PM,
It looks like something is actually wrong with your execution path: it
can't execute the 'p4' binary.
-David
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Diego Velasquez dvelasquez1...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi there,
I am been trying to run rb post inside p4 by creating a custom tool which
does the
Comment #3 on issue 3312 by george.m...@gmail.com: Diffs without embedded
commit IDs can not be used
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3312
Just tried to use rbt post which failed too, but maybe this is a separate
issue:
Comment #5 on issue 3376 by nicolas@gmail.com: RBTools 0.6 -
UnicodeEncodeError with ISO-8859-15
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3376
Hello,
No, the issue is not causing only by this diff file. We have several others
which generate the same error.
As you can
Comment #6 on issue 3329 by thom.ger...@gmail.com: Show proper error
message when attempting to publish review request with duplicate commit ID
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3329
Seeing this in deployed Reviewboard 2.0.1 with a MySQL db. user doing
PUT
Comment #6 on issue 3376 by trowb...@gmail.com: RBTools 0.6 -
UnicodeEncodeError with ISO-8859-15
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3376
Does this particular .diff file produce the exact same text in the Error
data part of the traceback?
--
You received this message
Comment #7 on issue 3329 by trowb...@gmail.com: Show proper error message
when attempting to publish review request with duplicate commit ID
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3329
I think that yours is a separate bug. Would you mind filing it, and
including the stack
Updates:
Status: PendingReview
Owner: trowb...@gmail.com
Labels: Component-RBTools
Comment #1 on issue 3410 by trowb...@gmail.com: perforce post-submit review
fails using rbt post when the submitted change set contains branch actions
Comment #5 on issue 3356 by trowb...@gmail.com: Diff currently
unavailable when reviewing change to file that is not pushed to remote
repo yet
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3356
So the diffs there look correct--it's generating a diff between def456 and
abc123 (the
Updates:
Status: ThirdParty
Comment #8 on issue 3354 by trowb...@gmail.com: TypeError for New Review
Request and View Diff after updade to Review Board 2.0
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3354
This traceback is nonsense, and I can't even find ConfigItem used in
Comment #8 on issue 2184 by bruce.c...@gmail.com: Mercurial rename support:
Pure file renames with *no actual changes* to the file fails with Diff did
not apply cleanly
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2184
I came across this problem today: the problem is that patch
Updates:
Status: ThirdParty
Comment #9 on issue 2184 by trowb...@gmail.com: Mercurial rename support:
Pure file renames with *no actual changes* to the file fails with Diff did
not apply cleanly
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2184
That sounds like great news.
Updates:
Status: NeedInfo
Comment #1 on issue 3409 by trowb...@gmail.com: List of which commits that
are reviewed/not reviewed
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=3409
If you're using the new post-commit UI in 2.0, you should see an icon next
to all commits that
34 matches
Mail list logo
