Extensions are going to be the big focus once we get 1.6 out the door. A lot
of work has gone into it by many, many students through both UCOSP and GSoC,
so that'll continue :)
Webhooks will end up being an exension. We had some work toward refactoring
it into an extension recently.
Christian
Christian!
It is great news! 1.7 sounds better then 2.0 :) Thanks!
Regards,
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 7:17 AM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
Extensions are going to be the big focus once we get 1.6 out the door. A lot
of work has gone into it by many, many students through both
The extensions work will still be 2.0. We will either end up going from 1.6
to 2.0, or we'll package a bunch of GSoC/UCOSP work as 1.7 while working on
2.0.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On
I quite agree. A lot of that needs to be finished up. For some of it, we've
had students go and finish up the project (or at least get further on it)
and we'll probably continue to do that.
There's always, of course, the need to deliver an interesting project that a
student can work on. Finishing
Hi Christian,
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 6:49 AM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
Hey everyone,
We've been accepted again this year in Google's Summer of Code, a yearly
event where students from around the world participate in open source
projects, developing work experience and
I'll suggest finishing bazaar support in post-review although there
may not be that much work left there.
Dan
On Mar 21, 4:19 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
Hey everyone,
We've been accepted again this year in Google's Summer of Code, a yearly
event where students from
I just meant it as a slightly snarky comment towards Christian Hammond
and his experienced development practices :-p
I know that hiring a talented coder for the Summer of Code project is
a much more organized way of getting something like this done. I'm
just a bit sad that I'll have to wait till
Hi Sam,
I understand that this is something you want ASAP, having just gone through
an install. However, it's important to know that for the moment at least,
Review Board is in no way our full-time job. It's something we work on in
the evenings and weekends when time permits, and really there's
@Alenxander, I mean no misunderstanding, I have no ill intent, just
eagerness to use this program.
So can I still apply with my idea - improvements of post-review tools?
Or am supposed to use only ideas from the list? Should I present a
patch that would fix one of RB issues or should I post
Hi Alexander,
You can apply with any idea that you like. We can certainly go over things,
and fine-tune the idea during the selection process with you. It doesn't
have to be an idea from this list. We just can't select any projects until
the selection process begins, and will have to sort through
Hi,
As far as I know a past GSOC session was the one that gave the initial
version of the ReviewBoard connector for Eclipse ( ereviewboard ). I have
picked up that integration and improved it in terms of
- stability
- support for the 2.0 REST API
- feature additions
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-gsoc/browse_thread/thread/fc38a36b2f93fa21
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
I think setting up some kind of all encompassing setup for this
software would great to drive up its user base, which I believe is
essential for its continuous improvement, now that it's reached a
pretty stable and useful state.
On Mar 21, 4:24 pm, Alexander Solovets asolov...@gmail.com wrote:
Agreed.
We have a prototype Windows installer, which gets you part of the way there
on a standard Windows setup. What's needed at that point is, I think, a
graphical front-end to rb-site, like we have on Linux.
For Linux (and this carries to Windows as well), I'd like to eventually see
the
Does it mean that you reject ReviewBoard CLI project? If you need
more details I can provide it here. I spoke with other RB users and at
least one of them said it would be a good idea. Mostly, because
console interface makes it possible to add non-web GUI on the top of
it. And a GUI in turn having
The installation work is an entirely separate body of work from the
post-review proposal. It's not one or the other.
However, we tend to get 15+ applications each year, and can only accept
generally 3 or 4, so I can't promise anyone at this point that they'll be
accepted. We won't be able to make
A bit early, yeah. I have in my head what I'd like to do for it, and I want
to make sure whatever student we work with is on the same page. Too many
efforts around installation will just complicate things.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board -
You sound experienced. Alright, but it's about time it gets done heh?
On Mar 21, 7:31 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
A bit early, yeah. I have in my head what I'd like to do for it, and I want
to make sure whatever student we work with is on the same page. Too many
efforts
18 matches
Mail list logo
