At 2008-02-04 04:04:03 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i've been using evolution, which has great IMAP support
*cough*
Yes, great. I tried to open a relatively small (45k messages) mailbox.
It connected, issued a command to fetch a large subset of the headers of
all of those messages, and then
At 2008-02-04 07:28:06 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hmmm i guess i've been using it for a while with on-going mboxes so it
hasn't had such problems.
Well, to be honest, I didn't expect it to segfault.
I tried KMail, Thunderbird, Evolution, and mutt on the same mailbox. All
of them issue
At 2008-02-01 11:28:23 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you can afford to wait for a few months the situation may change.
I can. Although I am planning to visit Bangalore in the near future, I
didn't mean to drive this time. I was just curious, because I've never
done a really long drive, and
Has anyone done it? Or does anyone have an idea of how long it will
take, and what the roads are like?
-- ams
At 2008-01-25 20:52:30 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm... it's been a long day, so a question to the list, should I
re-read this to see if it makes sense, or should I apply the kook
label and move on?
I think the first part means lots of people share a gmail account. I
couldn't figure out
At 2008-01-23 03:02:42 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In India, we treat foreigners visiting our country with
respect and this comes from humble, traditional customs.
i've heard too many horror stories from white women travelling alone
in india to believe that...
Oh, they're all
At 2008-01-09 08:33:22 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hope this is better?
Yes. Thanks!
-- ams
At 2007-12-18 16:17:47 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You'd have to spend quite some time there to provide a snack to a
small kid, let alone a full grown man.
By the time I put together enough for a small kid (I discovered the site
several days ago), I noticed that words had begun to repeat
At 2007-12-18 09:47:04 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wasn't able to get anything but a thin sliver of photograph!
Click on the VIEW IN LARGEST SIZE thing.
-- ams
At 2007-12-16 13:05:28 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Neat.
Thanks.
Whenever I share photos (which is rare) I dump them into a web-visible
directory, and process them with a script a la http://leitl.org/ice/
That reminds me of two changes I want to make to my own program. First,
a
At 2007-12-16 17:52:42 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The photos are at www.flickr.com/photos/venky7
Nice. I especially like the Makaibari (non-flash) photograph, and also
the fact that you've written comments for them all.
Your photographs of the Darjeeling zoo reminded me of some travel
At 2007-12-16 18:43:02 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of the main attractions mentioned was the Parmesan Nadia zoo.
(For those who haven't been to Darjeeling: it's really Padmaja Naidu.)
-- ams
Another long-ago trip, but just a few photographs this time:
http://toroid.org/ams/img/sundarban-2005
-- ams
At 2007-12-15 19:05:26 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, it is trivial to build photo slide shows e.g.
using Apple's iWeb
I've always just dumped .jpeg files into an auto-indexed directory on my
web server, but I recently gathered the motivation to do it better:
At 2007-12-12 13:32:06 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can I buy it in India?
Permanent Black is an Indian publisher.
See https://www.orientlongman.com/permanentblack.asp
-- ams
At 2007-12-11 14:40:20 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So you're saying that you're too cheap to get a real survey done,
but expect to be taken seriously on facts you admit to making up
yourself.
If that is not an ad homimen I don't know what is.
It's not ad hominem. If he'd said you're
At 2007-12-11 19:21:51 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cut the boring rhetoric boss.
OK.
-- ams
At 2007-11-30 09:56:06 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://toroid.org/ams/uttaranchal-2005
And as a gentle inducement to read the travelogue, here's a photograph
(which I might have posted to the list ages ago):
http://toroid.org/ams/img/binsar.jpeg
-- ams
At 2007-11-16 09:52:47 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(regarding polichathu vs. pollichathu)
There isn't any
Three-l lllama.
There isn't a three-l polllichathu either, but there's a 1-U
(non-rackmountable) version of the 1-l word (i.e. pulichathu)
that also means something different
At 2007-11-07 10:47:02 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And is this really the same word as split, or did the
Englishification screw it up?
This morning, several days later, it suddenly occurred to me that it is
in fact a different word, and that I know both words, and that the one-l
word means
At 2007-11-06 10:44:33 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(FWIW Jew Town would probably be offensive to most Jews [...]
IMO, Jew Town, despite the name, is not offensive.
I thought he meant the name was offensive.
-- ams
At 2007-11-07 10:02:53 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the place with the 'netti pollichathu kozhi? Roughly, it
translates to 'chicken fried standing-up'.
Actually, it would translate to chicken /split/, not fried, standing up.
I think the word you're looking for is porichathu (r not
At 2007-11-07 10:24:12 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pollichathu - coated with spices, wrapped in a banana leaf and baked.
Really? Wow.
And is this really the same word as split, or did the Englishification
screw it up?
-- ams
At 2007-11-02 22:17:59 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looking at this analytically, it seems that after a person is old
enough you should be able to look at their lives and back compute when
their moment of birth must have been, given the events in their lives.
Why? It could be a one-way
At 2007-10-12 13:49:53 +0430, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I realize that I I read up to Abhi and didn't complete the rest...am
suitably humbled and chagrined and cringing...!
Oh, there's no need to apologise.
*All my life* I've had people (both on the phone and in person) ask me
my name, and
At 2007-10-11 12:25:07 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not? Because that's not the intended application?
What might it have been used on earlier?
-- ams
At 2007-10-05 09:04:40 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because the tyranny of the masses is still a tyranny.
Where did tyranny come into the picture? [...]
Not allow was used in the sense of using public outcry to make a
person stop.
Oh, you mean those genteel demonstrations of
At 2007-09-25 15:05:31 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's mondegreen?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mondegreen
«A mondegreen is the mishearing (usually accidental) of a phrase as
a homophone or near-homophone in such a way that it acquires a new
meaning. [...]
The word
At 2007-09-05 15:21:59 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dude. NSFW warning. Please!
How much more of a warning can you get than a link which says
Clitoris.jpg in it?
-- ams
At 2007-09-03 11:37:42 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They're getting the best of both gene pools.
That doesn't make sense. They get whatever is in both gene pools, good
or bad. Besides, there isn't a look good gene.
It does seem to me, then, that the old war cry of racists verywhere
--
At 2007-09-03 12:21:35 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One study I've read says that people find average faces more
attractive - that if you take a sample set and produce an image
that is the average of the faces, that it will be considered
more attractive than a specific face.
That sounds
At 2007-08-23 09:24:03 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should check out the Belenix[1] LiveCD
Surely that's a typo for SchilliX.
-- ams
At 2007-08-23 14:50:05 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Schillix has not been updated for a long time and Joerg seems to have
lost interest in maintaining it.
(Psst. I was kidding.)
-- ams
At 2007-08-03 19:39:09 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lack of UTF-8 support? Divya's posts have newlines encoded as =0A.
=0A is the quoted-printable encoding of an ASCII line feed, and it has
nothing to do with UTF-8 (beyond all ASCII codepoints being valid under
UTF-8). Divya's message header
At 2007-07-15 19:23:50 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since you have been a decent person who does not post like a troll I
will try and give you a decent reply.
That's very nice of you. But as an indecent troll, I can barge into your
nice people's club (reducing the doorman to tears en route
At 2007-07-16 12:57:36 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And Zimbabweans were a lot friendlier and pleasant than the Batswana I
was living among at the time.
Say, have you read Alexander McCall Smith's The No. 1 Ladies' Detective
Agency books? If so, did you enjoy them?
-- ams
At 2007-07-14 23:11:22 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let me get this straight... Your conjecture is [...]
Bzzt.
Just because I made a somewhat-related conjecture in the same thread
does not make what I said about pilgrims a conjecture.
Quoted from Somanatha, The Many Voices of a History,
At 2007-07-14 10:59:57 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please elaborate on this part of your sentence: probably a much more
modern concept than you're giving it credit for.
I'll rephrase. The concept exists today and has existed for some time.
It seemed to me that you think it is ancient, and
At 2007-07-14 16:36:32 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is one of the clearest statements you have made.
Oh, is that why your replies gloss over most of what I've written?
I disagree with you.
That's one of the most well-reasoned statements you've made.
Anyway, I take it that means you
At 2007-07-13 09:37:29 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All were just people who had (as far as I know) free access
to travel to areas that they felt they needed to travel to on
pilgrimage no matter which ruler was in charge of a given area.
What does free access mean?
Pilgrims were, at that
At 2007-07-13 12:01:51 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Considering how tolerant the religion is, not to be confused with the
people who purportedly practise it, there is no attack.
Ah yes, the good religion, bad practitioners argument again.
-- ams
At 2007-07-13 15:27:46 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You don't have to accept a possibly concocted story as historical fact
just because a character in a story is named after a town.
I thought you were saying that the town was named after the character in
the story: Modern day Kandahar in
At 2007-07-13 16:12:54 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But the point is that you cannot call a people hostile based on this.
OK, I'll try to remember that the next time I want to call a people
hostile. But what relevance does it have to what I actually wrote in
*this* discussion?
The very
At 2007-07-13 18:51:14 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Many people in a country called the USA used to visit a town called
Las Vegas for a pilgrimage. And although the nation was deemed to be
free they were at risk of road accidents along the way so it was not
really as free and safe as it
I don't think that this was something specific to this part of the
world.
Er, yes. I didn't say it was. But so what if it wasn't? The fact remains
that pilgrimages could not be depended upon to be free, either in the
monetary sense or in terms of security and easy passage.
I don't think the
At 2007-07-13 19:00:34 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*** Whether a given ruler treated them well seems to have been
a toss up, and often did depend on the religion of both parties
(e.g. Shaivite kings might not give two hoots about Vaishnavite
pilgrims, etc.). ***
It has relevance to the
At 2007-07-13 22:13:23 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You also said that this was because the pilgrims did not believe the
same God the ruler did, which is what we are discussing here.
I said it was a toss up, and that religion was one of the factors that
might influence the protection
At 2007-07-14 06:54:47 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Outsiders typically had no wish (at least none that have been
recorded to my knowledge) to visit Badrinath or Kashi.
I think it was in no way unusual for Buddhist pilgrims to visit places
held sacred by Hindus. You could quibble and say
At 2007-07-06 09:38:11 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And why is Gmail so much better on the spam scenario?
On a related note, here's a paper titled Sender Reputation in a Large
Webmail Service by someone at Google. http://www.ceas.cc/2006/19.pdf
My opinion is that Yahoo engineers have the
I need some anti-audiophile advice.
I subscribed to Outlook and got a free Worldspace receiver and a 6-month
subscription. The receiver (which arrived today, after much delay) is a
little box with RCA outputs. The only Worldspace receiver I've seen had
a little built-in speaker, and that's what I
At 2007-06-18 15:38:27 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After that, the squirrel went into the 72-year-old man's garden and
massively attacked him on the arms, hand and thigh,
^^
Superpredators, anyone?
-- ams
At 2007-06-01 11:03:26 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seriously, though. The English in which almost all the 'me too'
replies are written on that board is terrible.
I'm surprised that this surprises you, really.
There are quite a few Indians who write pretty good English.
My vague
At 2007-06-02 11:32:47 +0430, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Two really interesting, intriguing pieces of software..could I hear
more about them (or at least, ams's code) please?
http://bookblog.net/gender/genie.php is a web site where you can paste
text, and it guesses the gender of the author by
At 2007-06-02 20:15:05 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.strategy-business.com/press/enewsarticle/enews053107?pg=0
Somebody send the guy some clue. He could use some.
I think I'm going to puke if I read another long rambling speculation
based on/around The Cathedral and The Bazaar.
At 2007-06-01 07:08:32 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These UFOs must, apparently, somehow affect our language centers.
Almost every one of these eyewitness reports is written in crappy
English.
Then it's true, they must have started acting on ancient India, because
this is pretty much how
At 2007-05-23 15:29:31 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The reason I ask is because I'm trying to identify this bug:
How very interesting. Was it alive?
-- ams
At 2007-05-23 17:18:49 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope. Dead. Dead-er. Dead-est.
Are you sure it's an insect?
-- ams
At 2007-05-23 17:46:06 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pretty sure of that. Even though it didn't have any visible antennae,
legs or wings.
Got any pictures of its (doubtless seedy) underbelly?
-- ams
At 2007-05-19 18:21:56 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Reading Nussbaum's book, one gets the impression that most Hindus in
India are fanatical.
Frankly, it's sometimes hard to escape that impression -- even though I
know it's not true -- without ever having heard of Nussbaum's book. The
vocal
At 2007-05-16 08:58:21 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Despite the anger of Jain and his compatriots, there was no major
violence
I love this sentence.
-- ams
At 2007-05-16 21:23:08 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was just wondering if I painted a picture of a woman with a baby
emerging from her vagina and labelled it Arundhati Roy would it
perhaps have been taken in better spirit that labelling it Durga
mata?
I hope you realise that it's
At 2007-05-17 00:44:34 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would just very briefly want to point out
:-)
Otherwise, at the end of the day, a musical composition is just a lot
of notes and my dear Dylan Thomas is just a series of words stringed
together.
Isn't that
At 2007-04-25 16:26:37 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
to repeat an often repeated anecdote: when the Lumiere brothers
showed their film of a train pulling into a platform
I wonder if the Lumière shorts are available somewhere (online?). I've
looked for them, but not found anything. Any ideas?
At 2007-04-25 19:53:15 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there anything that's not up on youtube?
Wow. I didn't even *think* of looking on Youtube.
Thank you!
-- ams
At 2007-04-03 22:56:04 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Human Computer Interaction candidate
Graphics, Visualization and Usability Center
http://worrydream.com/MagicInk/
-- ams
At 2007-04-02 06:09:22 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still get mail from makemytrip for one booking I made 6 months ago.
Oh great.
They haven't yet finished processing one booking for me, and I already
hate them. Their web site is dismal. Their feedback form doesn't work.
Their people are
At 2007-03-02 16:01:37 +0430, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I generally tend to run foul of the name-for-it Nazi when I post the
name of a bird (as it might be, the red-billed blue magpie) and get
strident corrections (NO! it is the ORANGE-billed blue magpie).
There's a little bird that everyone
http://didi.com/brad/mapOfScience/
-- ams
At 2007-02-23 16:26:30 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
some forms of interaction are probably not derivative, others (such as
static linking) certainly are
BTW, I don't see why static linking certainly makes a derivative work.
Surely that must be, again, a question of fact, to be decided based
At 2007-02-24 19:05:02 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because in static linking, the binary code is directly included in the
executable unlike in dynamic linking in which there are references and
the code is used at runtime.
Thanks, I know what static linking is.
As I understand it,
At 2007-02-24 19:44:36 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I understand it, however, directly including the binary code into
the executable doesn't necessarily constitute a derived work under
copyright law.
BTW: Remember LZEXE?
-- ams
At 2007-02-24 16:15:34 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but it is rather likely that a court would rule that the work is
derivative.
Has that specific question ever been tested in court?
your printpi program is clearly derivative of printf
Because it significantly transforms, adapts, or
At 2007-02-24 16:28:18 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
since it places no restrictions on derived works, there's no problem
with distributing programs compressed with LZEXE (which therefore
include LZEXE components in themselves) under any licence you please.
Oh, that wasn't my point at all.
At 2007-02-24 16:46:39 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i'm pretty sure a court would rule that dynamic linking, or static
linking, is a greater indicator of derivation than pure aggregation.
If you really meant (and I think you did) I'm pretty sure a court would
consider dynamic or static
At 2007-02-24 16:27:37 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, have you read Lexmark vs. Static Control?
the copyright-infringement part of that suit related to a really tiny
program that had to operate in constrained circumstances (i believe 50
bytes long or so).
Yes, a program on the toner
At 2007-02-22 18:59:32 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You don't need new protocols, just less distance between nodes.
How do you propose that this situation comes about?
Just wait for the Big Crunch.
-- ams
At 2007-02-22 13:14:38 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is obvious that the changes you made to the GPL-ed POP3
Er, just a moment.
For the record: *I* didn't modify any GPLed POP3 server (or whatever).
I constructed a simplified scenario (loosely based both on discussions
elsewhere and a
At 2007-02-22 15:57:37 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As far as copyright is concerned, you're right -- its most likely
_Not_ a derivative work, but would still likely infringe the GPL'ed
code.
How could it? I mean, if it isn't a derived work, by what mechanism
could it possibly infringe on
At 2007-02-22 21:44:06 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this is not really a question of law, it's a question of fact
depending on the circumstances of each case.
Great, thanks.
The modified POP3 server will however, almost certainly be a
derivative work of the original POP3 server
OK. As I
At 2007-02-23 08:55:15 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I constructed a simplified scenario (loosely based both on discussions
elsewhere
In particular, on the linux-kernel list, where there's an ongoing thread
about EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL and non-GPLed device drivers, and so on.
-- ams
At 2007-02-22 17:00:59 +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What are the company's obligations under the GPL?
To open-source their modifications.
[...]
But one popular perception is that the product (i.e. their program
plus the GPLed server) is a work derived from the both their
At 2007-02-22 12:49:13 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why can't they write their own anyway ? Unless it is not POP3 at all
and POP3 is a placeholder
(Yes, it's a placeholder for an entirely non-trivial program.)
-- ams
At 2007-02-01 09:34:29 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And yes, when I see eight year girls vomiting their dinner out because
they don't want to get fat - it makes me want to weep.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luisel_Ramos
Summary: 22-year-old Uruguayan model dies of a heart attack caused by
At 2007-02-15 13:12:25 +0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I presume that's a general question, not just targeted to ams.
Even if it was, ams was going to mention the unexpectedly heavy rainfall
in Delhi (and elsewhere in North India, I read) in the recent weeks.
A coupe of years ago, it snowed
At 2006-11-24 12:39:55 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do not recall Ms. Roy doing anything that might be construed as
either, hijacking the event, or being a publicity hog.
For that matter, I don't understand what specious, toxic rhetoric
she's supposed to specialise in, or why it's
At 2007-02-14 22:38:34 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
She isn't evil, just annoying.
I just find it interesting that she annoys people like you and Suresh so
much that you tend to compare her unfavourably with amoebae, or dismiss
her as a publicity-seeking spewer of toxic rhetoric; but not
At 2007-02-15 09:07:13 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://toroid.org/misc/shiny-little-bird.jpeg
Vewy pwetty. What is it?
It's an adult male Purple Sunbird, feeding in the Tacoma bush (tree?)
just outside my study window.
-- ams
At 2007-02-09 07:45:35 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sent from BlackBerry® on Airtel
Sounds like a quaint little English village.
-- ams
At 2007-02-09 14:24:54 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This claims that hydrogen energy is a hoax.
No, it talks about Ants and neurons.
-- ams
At 2007-02-07 11:17:36 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(not even Xanadu tackled much of that problem space).
Then again, which problem space can Xanadu claim to have tackled?
-- ams
At 2007-02-05 17:31:06 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been busy and might have missed the news, but who exactly burned
a trainload (or many trainloads) of people at any time?
That's a good question, but since the investigation into what happened
at Godhra was nicely botched, we're never
At 2007-02-02 16:03:12 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Green coloured paper cut in the shape of a banana leaf, with grooves.
Plastic coated. Meant to replace a real banana leaf.
They'll come in handy when the banana virus has eaten all the bananas in
the whole world.
-- ams
At 2007-01-12 18:24:41 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
maps.google.com/local_url?q=http://.0x2c.0x10.0x27/ [...]
* using hex numerals for the IP address. Hadn't seen that before.
That's because it's quite invalid, and I'd expect it to not work in most
cases. I guess it's targeting some
At 2007-01-10 12:51:21 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unless we are able to find another alternative
Wait, I know! Hypnosis!
-- ams
At 2007-01-10 06:56:19 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lactose intolerance to varying degrees is rampant in India - certainly
in Bangalore - where i work, but it tends to vary greatly in severity
and is rarely crippling.
I've sometimes wondered if my Bengali genes protect me from the lactose
At 2007-01-10 10:59:38 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Um, in narco tests, you pump the body with sedatives/barbituates/
truth serums, so the suspect cannot lie.
Hooray for not-quite-modern forensic not-quite-science.
-- ams
At 2007-01-10 11:52:52 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hooray for not-quite-modern forensic not-quite-science.
Can you suggest some alternatives?
I suggest not wasting (my!) money on voodoo forensic mumbo jumbo.
I suspect India is a few years away from CSI style forensics.
I read that
At 2007-01-04 12:57:59 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bayesian spam filter poison. The payload is in the image.
Interestingly, I get a fair amount of this sort of spam where there is
*no* attached image, no embedded URLs, etc. I wonder about that.
-- ams
At 2007-01-03 07:28:59 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They should shoot the hippos.
I hear hippos are tasty.
-- ams
At 2007-01-04 06:39:47 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Exactly where would one have to shoot a Hippo to kill it dead?
I don't know, but:
I shoot the Hippopotamus
With bullets made of platinum,
Because if I use leaden ones,
His hide is sure to flatten 'em.
--
101 - 200 of 291 matches
Mail list logo
