RE: FDC & Pump Suction

2021-04-20 Thread Matt Grise via Sprinklerforum
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2021 2:11 PM To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org Cc: Mike Morey ; Brian Harris Subject: RE: FDC & Pump Suction Is cap it and put one on the building an option? Generally that's what we'd do in that scenario as there isn't much else you can safely do bec

RE: FDC & Pump Suction

2021-04-20 Thread Mike Morey via Sprinklerforum
Is cap it and put one on the building an option? Generally that's what we'd do in that scenario as there isn't much else you can safely do because of the compound pressure increase potential with a fire pump. Presumably you have to put a test header somewhere, just add an FDC as well? Of

Re: FDC & Pump

2018-02-03 Thread Charles Thurston
foreseeable, the standard (14) is mute in that regard. SL From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Dewayne Martinez Sent: Friday, February 02, 2018 11:42 AM To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org Subject: RE: FDC & Pump No, I have

Re: FDC & Pump

2018-02-03 Thread Jamie Seidl
> > > > > > From:Sprinklerforum > [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of > Dewayne Martinez > Sent: Friday, February 02, 2018 11:42 AM > To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org > Subject: RE: FDC & Pu

RE: FDC & Pump

2018-02-02 Thread Steve Leyton
: Sprinklerforum [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Dewayne Martinez Sent: Friday, February 02, 2018 11:42 AM To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org Subject: RE: FDC & Pump No, I have had to put an extra control valve for the standpipe feed at point of connec

RE: FDC & Pump

2018-02-02 Thread Dewayne Martinez
-2017] *From:* Sprinklerforum [mailto: sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] *On Behalf Of *Steve Leyton *Sent:* Friday, February 02, 2018 9:39 AM *To:* sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org *Subject:* RE: FDC & Pump What valve are you referring to as “standpipe feed” con

RE: FDC & Pump

2018-02-02 Thread Steve Leyton
>] On Behalf Of Tom Duross Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 4:36 PM To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org<mailto:sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org> Subject: RE: FDC & Pump What Larry said.. And there can’t be any valves between the FDC and the FDV’s on the standpipe unl

RE: FDC & Pump

2018-02-02 Thread Steve Leyton
@lists.firesprinkler.org Subject: Re: FDC & Pump If I have an existing FDC at the hot box and add a pump later, then the FDC must be moved to the pumphouse? On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 6:29 AM, Dewayne Martinez <dmarti...@total-mechanical.com<mailto:dmarti...@total-mechanical.com>> wrote: Tom

Re: FDC & Pump

2018-02-02 Thread Travis Mack
kee, WI 53072 >> >> dmarti...@total-mechanical.com >> >> Ph: 262-522-7110 >> >> Cell: 414-406-5208 >> >> http://www.total-mechanical.com/ >> >> >> >> >> >> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:sprinklerfo

Re: FDC & Pump

2018-02-02 Thread Kenneth Berman
m [mailto:sprinklerforum-bounces@lists.firesprinkler. > org] *On Behalf Of *Tom Duross > *Sent:* Wednesday, January 31, 2018 4:36 PM > *To:* sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org > *Subject:* RE: FDC & Pump > > > > What Larry said.. > > And there can’t be any valves between

RE: FDC & Pump

2018-02-02 Thread Dewayne Martinez
*To:* sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org *Subject:* RE: FDC & Pump What Larry said.. And there can’t be any valves between the FDC and the FDV’s on the standpipe unless you have more than one standpipe and have isolation valves at the base of each standpipe so you can’t take them off the riser mani

RE: [EXTERNAL] RE: FDC & Pump

2018-01-31 Thread Kyle . Montgomery
be the preferable arrangement. Am I misinterpreting this? -Kyle M From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Tom Duross Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 3:36 PM To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: FDC & Pump What Larry

RE: FDC & Pump

2018-01-31 Thread Tom Duross
and also allowed, the FDC check…. duh What Larry said.. And there can’t be any valves between the FDC and the FDV’s on the standpipe unless you have more than one standpipe and have isolation valves at the base of each standpipe so you can’t take them off the riser manifold, for

RE: FDC & Pump

2018-01-31 Thread Tom Duross
What Larry said.. And there can’t be any valves between the FDC and the FDV’s on the standpipe unless you have more than one standpipe and have isolation valves at the base of each standpipe so you can’t take them off the riser manifold, for example. TD The requirement is from NFPA 13,

Re: FDC & Pump

2018-01-31 Thread Jamie Seidl
Thanks everyone. I knew why, I just couldn't remember where. > > On Jan 31, 2018 at 4:34 PM, mailto:jnor...@rlhfp.com)> wrote: > > > > > > Last time I looked the FDC was not allowed on the suction side.That > requirement was in NFPA 13 under

RE: FDC & Pump

2018-01-31 Thread Larry Keeping
The requirement is from NFPA 13, not from NFPA 20. Here is the text from NFPA 13-2013: 8.17.2.4.8 Fire department connections shall not be connected on the suction side of fire pumps. Larry Keeping From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of

RE: FDC & Pump

2018-01-31 Thread Prahl, Craig/GVL
The FDC is for pressurizing the loop in the event that the main fire pump is out of service and you have to use the pumper apparatus. Craig L. Prahl Fire Protection Group Lead/SME Direct - 864.920.7540 Fax - 864.920.7129 Direct Extension 77540 CH2M is now Jacobs. 200 Verdae Blvd. Greenville,

RE: FDC & Pump

2018-01-31 Thread Matt Grise
The pump will still boost its inlet pressure. If you use the FDC to boost the inlet pressure to 175, then the pump will discharge 175 + pump pressure. Could be too much. Matt From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Jamie Seidl Sent: Wednesday,

RE: FDC & Pump

2018-01-31 Thread Jason Norton
Last time I looked the FDC was not allowed on the suction side. That requirement was in NFPA 13 under the FDC location section. Jason Norton, PE – RLH Fire Protection Direct: (661) 410-1334, Mobile: (661) 979-6301, Fax: (661) 322-6816 Mailing Address: PO Box 42470, Bakersfield, CA 93384 From:

Re: FDC pump in circle with hydrant on underground

2017-02-08 Thread Parsley Consulting
Brad, The gate-check-gate thing is similar to an RPDA with OS's on each side. *Ken Wagoner, SET *Parsley Consulting*** *350 West 9th Avenue, Suite 206 *Escondido, California 92025 *Phone 760-745-6181* Visit our website

Re: FDC pump in circle with hydrant on underground

2017-02-07 Thread Bruce Verhei
For fire protection one of the most sought and least important measures is "arrival time of first unit". A much better time measure is agent (water) first applied, and when enough of that agent is applied to stop growth. It takes time to stretch lines, and apply water. Let's avoid a very long

Re: FDC pump in circle with hydrant on underground

2017-02-07 Thread Brad Casterline
We all have our several talents. As a designer I thank Goodness my stuff only has to work for the first 15-30 minutes--- then the rubber meets the road. Google 'Average Fire Department Response Time'. On Feb 7, 2017 9:44 PM, "Bruce Verhei" wrote: > Is it functional to pump

Re: FDC pump in circle with hydrant on underground

2017-02-07 Thread Bruce Verhei
Is it functional to pump from the discharge port of an engine to a suction port? Just like all other positions half of FM's are below average. Best Bruce Verhei > On Feb 7, 2017, at 12:01, michael G wrote: > > Is it not feasible to put the FDC on the building? Or on a

Re: FDC pump in circle with hydrant on underground

2017-02-07 Thread Brad Casterline
Lol. I was thinking about the graphic Ken P posted yesterday, lower left with the gate, check, gate, and imagining the check being held open like it wasn't there, or only 85% there or whatever, and a Fire Dept. person wanting two checks in case one of them got held open by a rock. Your hydraulic

Re: FDC pump in circle with hydrant on underground

2017-02-07 Thread AKS-Gmail-IMAP
Answers to your questions. > On Feb 7, 2017, at 2:01 PM, michael G wrote: > > Is it not feasible to put the FDC on the building? Or on a separate feed back > to the building in lieu of creating an inefficient scenario as described? > Yes > On Feb 7, 2017, at 2:50 PM,

Re: FDC pump in circle with hydrant on underground

2017-02-07 Thread Ed Vining
Is there not a check valve or alarm check on the riser, upstream of the FDC connection to the riser? On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Allan Seidel wrote: > I'm looking at an FDC setup on the underground main to a building > (sprinklers and standpipe) where there is not a

Re: FDC pump in circle with hydrant on underground

2017-02-07 Thread Brad Casterline
Is there a key operated gate upstream of the FDC they plan on closing once they get set up, to 'check' the circuit? I have heard some concearn by FP people about rocks holding check valves open and creating the situation you describe. Brad On Feb 7, 2017 1:57 PM, "Allan Seidel"

RE: FDC pump in circle with hydrant on underground

2017-02-07 Thread Mitchell, Scott
Is it a private or public main supplying the building lead-in underground pipe? J. Scott Mitchell, PE Senior Fire Protection Engineer Mission Engineering CNS Y-12 | 865-576-5258 CNS PTX | 806-477-5883 From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of

RE: FDC pump in circle with hydrant on underground

2017-02-07 Thread michael G
Is it not feasible to put the FDC on the building? Or on a separate feed back to the building in lieu of creating an inefficient scenario as described? Michael Goodis Estimator, Project Manager IL#000635 NICET#135586 Key Fire Protection Enterprises LLC 3200 Mike Padgett HWY Augusta,