On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 12:11:25PM -0800, Christopher Brian Jack wrote:
>
>
> > > There _has_ to be a question when installing asking the
> > > user if he/she pays for bandwidth (esp outgoing) and set the configuration in
> > > Freenet accordingly - bad press resulting from Joe Doe installing Fre
> > There _has_ to be a question when installing asking the
> > user if he/she pays for bandwidth (esp outgoing) and set the configuration in
> > Freenet accordingly - bad press resulting from Joe Doe installing Freenet and
> > getting $1000 bills (think NZ, OZ) isn't good.
> Hmm. Good idea. How
On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 03:18:10PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Quoting Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > So, this email is an invitation to anyone that has constructive
> > criticism or suggestion's for how Freenet's "first impression" can be
> > enhanced. Topics include installation,
On Saturday 01 November 2003 05:13 pm, Paul wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 1, 2003 at 14:10:43 +0800, Toad wrote:
> >On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 10:31:58PM -0800, Paul wrote:
> >> I see the installation of Freenet and the configuration of Freenet to
> >> be an area that needs serious attention.
> >>
> >> Firs
On Sat, Nov 1, 2003 at 14:10:43 +0800, Toad wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 10:31:58PM -0800, Paul wrote:
I see the installation of Freenet and the configuration of Freenet to
be an area that needs serious attention.
First, I use Freenet on a Mac, but Mac OS X is not shown anymore as a
compatibl
On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 11:35:53AM -0500, Nick Tarleton wrote:
> On Friday 31 October 2003 12:54 pm, Doug Bostrom wrote:
> > The splitfile interface provides a useful measure of progress or at least
> > continued activity. How about something to give users a little feedback
> > while other key type
On Friday 31 October 2003 12:54 pm, Doug Bostrom wrote:
> The splitfile interface provides a useful measure of progress or at least
> continued activity. How about something to give users a little feedback
> while other key types are being retrieved?
>
> Browsers generally provide some kind of indi
On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 10:31:58PM -0800, Paul wrote:
> I see the installation of Freenet and the configuration of Freenet to
> be an area that needs serious attention.
>
> First, I use Freenet on a Mac, but Mac OS X is not shown anymore as a
> compatible OS on the Freenet web site download page
"[EMAIL PROTECTED],UUleYfXnBfLThNmkB8dACg" part might
be the bit with which they are having trouble. freenet:xxx URLs won't
change that, but they will introduce a world of pain.
Freenet URLs are much more likely to be given to people in hyperlink
form, in which case the actual form of the URL i
One thing people haven't suggested yet:
Log file rotation with deletion of old logfiles and a maximum space
usage setting.
On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 12:37:27PM +, Ian Clarke wrote:
> As the developers work hard to improve the core operation of Freenet, it
> can be easy to forget about the more
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 18:03:33 +, Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just how are you trying to get people to visit such links? Verbally? If
Thanks for calling Freenet advocates "idiots" - but the reaction is more
pity from my side than anything else. "http://localhost:"; is what
peopl
Troed Sångberg wrote:
You asked what is needed for general acceptance of Freenet, I replied.
And I disagreed.
I've advocated Freenet for a long time along my peers (I'm a
professional Software Engineer, specialising in crypto/security issues)
- and trying to get people to visit links to http://l
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 15:57:49 +, Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
freenet:// handled by Opera, Firebird etc. If Freenet isn't installed,
a redirection to http://freenet.sf.net where the download links are
more prominently displayed.
We have debated the whole freenet:xxx thing before and
On Friday 31 October 2003 07:37, Ian Clarke wrote:
> So, this email is an invitation to anyone that has constructive
> criticism or suggestion's for how Freenet's "first impression" can be
> enhanced. Topics include installation, FProxy, even the website's layout.
>
> Ian.
The splitfile interfac
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
freenet:// handled by Opera, Firebird etc. If Freenet isn't installed, a
redirection to http://freenet.sf.net where the download links are more
prominently displayed.
We have debated the whole freenet:xxx thing before and there are serious
problems with it - not least of
Quoting Ian Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> So, this email is an invitation to anyone that has constructive
> criticism or suggestion's for how Freenet's "first impression" can be
> enhanced. Topics include installation, FProxy, even the website's layout.
freenet:// handled by Opera, Firebird et
16 matches
Mail list logo
