On 9/16/2020 3:10 AM, Yotoleo wrote:
> Attempting to use SeaMonkey 2.53.3 to browse to a device that requires
> configuration.
> When loading the configuration GUI information is failing to be displayed due
> to a Java plugin not being enabled. When browsing the add on's tab for the
Hi,
Yotoleo a tapoté le 16/09/2020 12:10:
> Attempting to use SeaMonkey 2.53.3 to browse to a device that requires
> configuration.
> When loading the configuration GUI information is failing to be displayed due
> to a Java plugin not being enabled. When browsing the
Attempting to use SeaMonkey 2.53.3 to browse to a device that requires
configuration.
When loading the configuration GUI information is failing to be displayed due
to a Java plugin not being enabled. When browsing the add on's tab for the Java
Run Time plugin I can only find the JavaScript
Ray_Net wrote:
Daniel wrote on 24-01-20 09:38:
Ant wrote on 24/01/2020 5:42 PM:
V2.49.5 is the stable version right now. No Flash? I don't use any web
sites that use Shockave and Silverlight these days. That includes Java. :O
I still get offered updates to my Java every couple of days
Daniel wrote on 24-01-20 09:38:
Ant wrote on 24/01/2020 5:42 PM:
V2.49.5 is the stable version right now. No Flash? I don't use any
web sites that use Shockave and Silverlight these days. That includes
Java. :O
I still get offered updates to my Java every couple of days!!
Click
On 1/24/2020 12:38 AM, Daniel wrote:
Ant wrote on 24/01/2020 5:42 PM:
V2.49.5 is the stable version right now. No Flash? I don't use any web
sites that use Shockave and Silverlight these days. That includes
Java. :O
I still get offered updates to my Java every couple of days!!
Click
Ant wrote on 24/01/2020 5:42 PM:
V2.49.5 is the stable version right now. No Flash? I don't use any web
sites that use Shockave and Silverlight these days. That includes Java. :O
I still get offered updates to my Java every couple of days!!
Click on the "Get update now&qu
On 14/10/2017 9:49 PM, Mr. Ed wrote:
On 10/13/17 4:10 PM, Smiles wrote:
I get the note that Java is not enabled in browser but can not find it in
settings SeaMonkey 2.48 under Win7
Do you see it listed on the "Plug-ins" screen of Tools->Add-on Manager??
--
Daniel
User agent
On 10/13/17 4:10 PM, Smiles wrote:
> I get the note that Java is not enabled in browser but can not find it in
> settings SeaMonkey 2.48 under Win7
--
"This is America! You can't make a horse
testify against himself!" Mister Ed
___
On 10/13/17 4:10 PM, Smiles wrote:
> I get the note that Java is not enabled in browser but can not find it in
> settings SeaMonkey 2.48 under Win7
I've been running without Java on my machine for over two years. Have only had
problems with one site that I decided not to use anymore.
I rec
On 10/13/2017 1:10 PM, Smiles wrote:
> I get the note that Java is not enabled in browser but can not find it
> in settings SeaMonkey 2.48 under Win7
>
What version of Java do you have? The latest is 8 U144 (11.144.2.1).
Also, for SeaMonkey, you need the x32 version, not the x64 versi
On 10/13/17 4:10 PM, Smiles wrote:
I get the note that Java is not enabled in browser but can not find it
in settings SeaMonkey 2.48 under Win7
From the menu bar select Edit > Preferences > Advanced > Scripts &
Plugins and enable JavaScript for the Browser.
The Java NPAPI
I get the note that Java is not enabled in browser but can not find it
in settings SeaMonkey 2.48 under Win7
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Desiree wrote:
On 7/25/2017 11:23 PM, Desiree wrote:
I just updated Java on Windows 8 both 32 bit and 64 bit versions. Pale
Moon sees the latest version for 64 bit browsers (and I ran Netalyzer
with no problems). SeaMonkey 2.46 (and Fx 45.9 ESR) do NOT see the new
32 bit version. Why?
Also
> I thought SeaMonkey no longer supported the Java plugin?
Good till 2.49.1 for the x86 version. It might even work in later
versions but some plugin code has already been removed so totally
unsupported there. Blacklisted by Mozilla for all x64 versions.
FRG
EE wrote:
Desiree wrote:
O
On 7/26/2017 4:31 AM, Desiree wrote:
> On 7/25/2017 11:23 PM, Desiree wrote:
>> I just updated Java on Windows 8 both 32 bit and 64 bit versions. Pale
>> Moon sees the latest version for 64 bit browsers (and I ran Netalyzer
>> with no problems). SeaMonkey 2.46 (and Fx
On 7/25/2017 11:23 PM, Desiree wrote:
I just updated Java on Windows 8 both 32 bit and 64 bit versions. Pale
Moon sees the latest version for 64 bit browsers (and I ran Netalyzer
with no problems). SeaMonkey 2.46 (and Fx 45.9 ESR) do NOT see the new
32 bit version. Why?
Also, before I
I just updated Java on Windows 8 both 32 bit and 64 bit versions. Pale
Moon sees the latest version for 64 bit browsers (and I ran Netalyzer
with no problems). SeaMonkey 2.46 (and Fx 45.9 ESR) do NOT see the new
32 bit version. Why?
Also, before I updated, I checked Plugins at Mozilla's
Cruz, Jaime wrote:
On 06/19/2017 08:15 AM, Dirk Munk wrote:
Cruz, Jaime wrote:
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
No 64 bit version of Firefox or Seamonkey supports a Java plugin.
U... no... my 64 bit version of Firefox AND my 64 bit version of
Seamonkey both work quite well with the OpenJDK
On 06/19/2017 08:15 AM, Dirk Munk wrote:
Cruz, Jaime wrote:
Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
No 64 bit version of Firefox or Seamonkey supports a Java plugin.
U... no... my 64 bit version of Firefox AND my 64 bit version of
Seamonkey both work quite well with the OpenJDK plug in.
--
Jaime
with 2.50 the pref has been removed because it is no longer
guaranteed that plugins other than Flash will work.
FRG
Desiree wrote:
I'm not upgrading Fx 45.9 ESR to 52 ESR because there is no Java
plugin for version 52. Will there be a Java plugin for SeaMonkey
2.48? What about 2.49 (as it is based off
with 2.50 the pref has been removed because it is no longer
guaranteed that plugins other than Flash will work.
FRG
Desiree wrote:
I'm not upgrading Fx 45.9 ESR to 52 ESR because there is no Java
plugin for version 52. Will there be a Java plugin for SeaMonkey
2.48? What about 2.49 (as it is based off
it is no longer
guaranteed that plugins other than Flash will work.
FRG
Desiree wrote:
I'm not upgrading Fx 45.9 ESR to 52 ESR because there is no Java
plugin for version 52. Will there be a Java plugin for SeaMonkey
2.48? What about 2.49 (as it is based off Fx 52 ESR)?
That is NOT necessary
guaranteed that plugins other than Flash will work.
FRG
Desiree wrote:
I'm not upgrading Fx 45.9 ESR to 52 ESR because there is no Java
plugin for version 52. Will there be a Java plugin for SeaMonkey
2.48? What about 2.49 (as it is based off Fx 52 ESR)?
That is NOT necessary for the ESR version
other than Flash will work.
FRG
Desiree wrote:
I'm not upgrading Fx 45.9 ESR to 52 ESR because there is no Java
plugin for version 52. Will there be a Java plugin for SeaMonkey
2.48? What about 2.49 (as it is based off Fx 52 ESR)?
That is NOT necessary for the ESR version of Firefox. I know
will work.
FRG
Desiree wrote:
I'm not upgrading Fx 45.9 ESR to 52 ESR because there is no Java plugin for
version 52. Will there be a Java plugin for SeaMonkey 2.48? What about 2.49
(as it is based off Fx 52 ESR)?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
I'm not upgrading Fx 45.9 ESR to 52 ESR because there is no Java plugin
for version 52. Will there be a Java plugin for SeaMonkey 2.48? What
about 2.49 (as it is based off Fx 52 ESR)?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey
Tom Pamin wrote:
The webcam at this site just shows a spinning java icon. I used to be
able to see the cam by adding an exception under java security. Now it
doesn't work at all. Can anyone see the cam?
http://dingdarlingsociety.org/refuge-cam
I can't see the cam, but only this:
http
Paul in Houston, TX wrote:
stan pierce wrote:
I use NoScript and often get the message from applications to enable
Java. To do this, I
Temporarily Allow This Page. Is there a simpler or better was to
enable Java? Thanks. Stan.
Doesn't SM have a built in pop up to enable Java?
FF does. I use
Tom Pamin wrote:
The webcam at this site just shows a spinning java icon. I used to be
able to see the cam by adding an exception under java security. Now it
doesn't work at all. Can anyone see the cam?
http://dingdarlingsociety.org/refuge-cam
Just found out from the web site owner
Tom Pamin wrote:
The webcam at this site just shows a spinning java icon. I used to be able to
see the cam
by adding an exception under java security. Now it doesn't work at all. Can
anyone see the
cam?
http://dingdarlingsociety.org/refuge-cam
Similar to Paul G., I get "req
Tom Pamin wrote:
The webcam at this site just shows a spinning java icon. I used to be
able to see the cam by adding an exception under java security. Now it
doesn't work at all. Can anyone see the cam?
http://dingdarlingsociety.org/refuge-cam
The website lies to you: "This video req
The webcam at this site just shows a spinning java icon. I used to be
able to see the cam by adding an exception under java security. Now it
doesn't work at all. Can anyone see the cam?
http://dingdarlingsociety.org/refuge-cam
___
support-seamonkey
stan pierce wrote:
I use NoScript and often get the message from applications to enable Java. To
do this, I
Temporarily Allow This Page. Is there a simpler or better was to enable Java?
Thanks. Stan.
Doesn't SM have a built in pop up to enable Java?
FF does. I use FF and Java to connect
On 01/03/2016 20:08, EE wrote:
> stan pierce wrote:
>> I use NoScript and often get the message from applications to enable
>> Java. To do this, I Temporarily Allow This Page. Is there a simpler or
>> better was to enable Java? Thanks. Stan.
>
> Why do you need t
stan pierce wrote:
I use NoScript and often get the message from applications to enable
Java. To do this, I Temporarily Allow This Page. Is there a simpler or
better was to enable Java? Thanks. Stan.
Why do you need to use java? The only types of websites that I accessed
in the past
I use NoScript and often get the message from applications to enable
Java. To do this, I Temporarily Allow This Page. Is there a simpler or
better was to enable Java? Thanks. Stan.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
o save the files as mp3's, but it requires the latest JAVA
>>> plugin. The mp3's can be saved to DVD and played on my digital SAYO TV.
>>>
>>> Is the new JAVA safe ? Why is JAVA required for mp3 ? I barely know
>>> enough of this stuff to
DoctorBill wrote:
I have been converting and watching YouTube vids converted to flv files
via Keepvid. (FLV-Media-Player).
I now want to save the files as mp3's, but it requires the latest JAVA
plugin. The mp3's can be saved to DVD and played on my digital SAYO TV.
Is the new JAVA safe ? Why
Mason83 wrote:
On 21/02/2016 05:58, Paul in Houston, TX wrote:
DoctorBill wrote:
I have been converting and watching YouTube vids converted to flv files via
Keepvid.
(FLV-Media-Player).
I now want to save the files as mp3's, but it requires the latest JAVA plugin.
The mp3's
can be saved
On 21/02/2016, DoctorBill <ab...@example.com> wrote:
> I have been converting and watching YouTube vids
> converted to flv files via Keepvid.
> (FLV-Media-Player).
>
> I now want to save the files as mp3's, but it
> requires the latest JAVA plugin. The mp3's can be
> sa
On 21/02/2016 05:58, Paul in Houston, TX wrote:
> DoctorBill wrote:
>> I have been converting and watching YouTube vids converted to flv files via
>> Keepvid.
>> (FLV-Media-Player).
>>
>> I now want to save the files as mp3's, but it requires the latest JAVA
>
DoctorBill wrote:
I have been converting and watching YouTube vids converted to flv files via
Keepvid.
(FLV-Media-Player).
I now want to save the files as mp3's, but it requires the latest JAVA plugin.
The mp3's
can be saved to DVD and played on my digital SAYO TV.
Is the new JAVA safe
I have been converting and watching YouTube vids
converted to flv files via Keepvid.
(FLV-Media-Player).
I now want to save the files as mp3's, but it
requires the latest JAVA plugin. The mp3's can be
saved to DVD and played on my digital SAYO TV.
Is the new JAVA safe ? Why is JAVA
How do I enable Java Script for only the browser webpage page I am
trying to view?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
On 12/3/2015 8:35 AM, OldFeller wrote:
> How do I enable Java Script for only the browser webpage page I am
> trying to view?
>
Your subject says "Java". Your message says "JavaScript". They are NOT
the same. Which one is causing you a problem?
--
David E
OldFeller wrote:
How do I enable Java Script for only the browser webpage page I am
trying to view?
afaik Seamonkey does not offer this directly.
You could install the add-on "Noscript" (which is itself mostly written
in JavaScript) and that allows you to execute or prohib
OldFeller wrote:
How do I enable Java Script for only the browser webpage page I am
trying to view?
Java and javascript are not the same thing, or do you mean that you want
to read the source code for java applets?
___
support-seamonkey mailing
David E. Ross wrote:
On 4/26/2015 8:38 AM, Larry S. wrote:
I keep getting reminders that a Java update is available, but when I try
to download it I get the message: Unable to validate security integrity
on the file. Fie is either corrupted or unsigned.
This has been going on for some time now
On 5/2/15, Larry S. schwenkla...@optonline.net wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 4/26/2015 8:38 AM, Larry S. wrote:
I keep getting reminders that a Java update is available, but when I try
to download it I get the message: Unable to validate security integrity
on the file. Fie is either
Larry S. wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 4/26/2015 8:38 AM, Larry S. wrote:
I keep getting reminders that a Java update is available, but when I try
to download it I get the message: Unable to validate security integrity
on the file. Fie is either corrupted or unsigned.
This has been going
Lee wrote:
On 5/2/15, Larry S. schwenkla...@optonline.net wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 4/26/2015 8:38 AM, Larry S. wrote:
I keep getting reminders that a Java update is available, but when I try
to download it I get the message: Unable to validate security integrity
on the file. Fie
On 5/2/2015 3:01 PM, Lee wrote:
On 5/2/15, Larry S. schwenkla...@optonline.net wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 4/26/2015 8:38 AM, Larry S. wrote:
I keep getting reminders that a Java update is available, but when I try
to download it I get the message: Unable to validate security integrity
I keep getting reminders that a Java update is available, but when I try
to download it I get the message: Unable to validate security integrity
on the file. Fie is either corrupted or unsigned.
This has been going on for some time now. Assuming that Java knows how
to send a good file, I
Larry S. wrote:
I keep getting reminders that a Java update is available, but when I try
to download it I get the message: Unable to validate security integrity
on the file. Fie is either corrupted or unsigned.
This has been going on for some time now. Assuming that Java knows how
to send
On 4/26/2015 8:38 AM, Larry S. wrote:
I keep getting reminders that a Java update is available, but when I try
to download it I get the message: Unable to validate security integrity
on the file. Fie is either corrupted or unsigned.
This has been going on for some time now. Assuming
Linux install of SM (as shown in my sig), the RHS changes to
allow entry of e-mail and Password, and tick spot for Remember Me
My system is a WinXP SP3 and I've tried both Java 7.75 and 8.40.
Despite similar names, JavaScript has little to do with Java apart from
having similar keywords
Technical Support is a web-based Portal...)
shows a login form. When I click register, the whole lower part of the
page (including the left-hand menu) is replaced with a registration form.
SeaMonkey 2.33 on Windows Vista.
My system is a WinXP SP3 and I've tried both Java 7.75 and 8.40
Not sure if this is 2.33 related or has been present with earlier versions.
I've been trying to use https://support.avast.com , things like the login or
register, and nothing happens.
My system is a WinXP SP3 and I've tried both Java 7.75 and 8.40. I have scripts
turn on in the Seamonkey
Java keeps trying to update. It always fails, with the message Unable
to validate security integrity on this file. File is either corrupted or
unsigned.
Yes, I know about the security problem, which is why I keep it turned
off except when needed to scan in checks to my credit union
On 2/18/2015 9:47 AM, Larry S. wrote:
Java keeps trying to update. It always fails, with the message Unable
to validate security integrity on this file. File is either corrupted or
unsigned.
Yes, I know about the security problem, which is why I keep it turned
off except when needed
not be
necessary, not really sure.
Original Message
Java keeps trying to update. It always fails, with the message Unable
to validate security integrity on this file. File is either corrupted or
unsigned.
Yes, I know about the security problem, which is why I keep it turned
off except
. It may not be
necessary, not really sure.
Original Message
Java keeps trying to update. It always fails, with the message Unable
to validate security integrity on this file. File is either corrupted or
unsigned.
Yes, I know about the security problem, which is why I keep
.
Original Message
Java keeps trying to update. It always fails, with the message Unable
to validate security integrity on this file. File is either corrupted or
unsigned.
Yes, I know about the security problem, which is why I keep it turned
off except when needed to scan in checks
): https://www.java.com/en/download/manual.jsp
The uninstaller leaves some detritus, which I clean up. It may not be
necessary, not really sure.
Original Message
Java keeps trying to update. It always fails, with the message Unable
to validate security integrity
On 3/22/2014 5:57 PM, MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 22/03/2014 22:50, Desiree told the world:
Mozilla's check your plugins page is claiming that Java 7 update 51 is
outdated. This is on my XP Pro machine using the latest version of
SeaMonkey.
Java 8 is out only at Oracle's download
David E. Ross wrote:
On 3/22/2014 6:50 PM, Desiree wrote:
Mozilla's check your plugins page is claiming that Java 7 update 51 is
outdated. This is on my XP Pro machine using the latest version of
SeaMonkey.
Java 8 is out only at Oracle's download page (not on java.com for
several more weeks
Rickles rick-sharrem...@thismrasars.plus.com wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 3/22/2014 6:50 PM, Desiree wrote:
Mozilla's check your plugins page is claiming that Java 7 update 51 is
outdated. This is on my XP Pro machine using the latest version of
SeaMonkey.
Java 8 is out only at Oracle's
On 03/22/2014 09:50 PM, Desiree wrote:
Mozilla's check your plugins page is claiming that Java 7 update 51 is
outdated. This is on my XP Pro machine using the latest version of
SeaMonkey.
Java 8 is out only at Oracle's download page (not on java.com for
several more weeks). Further, Oracle
Rob wrote:
Rickles rick-sharrem...@thismrasars.plus.com wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 3/22/2014 6:50 PM, Desiree wrote:
Mozilla's check your plugins page is claiming that Java 7 update 51 is
outdated. This is on my XP Pro machine using the latest version of
SeaMonkey.
Java 8 is out only
On 03/22/2014 09:50 PM, Desiree wrote:
Mozilla's check your plugins page is claiming that Java 7 update 51 is
outdated. This is on my XP Pro machine using the latest version of
SeaMonkey.
Java 8 is out only at Oracle's download page (not on java.com for
several more weeks). Further, Oracle
On 3/23/2014 6:13 AM, Rob wrote:
Rickles rick-sharrem...@thismrasars.plus.com wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 3/22/2014 6:50 PM, Desiree wrote:
Mozilla's check your plugins page is claiming that Java 7 update 51 is
outdated. This is on my XP Pro machine using the latest version of
SeaMonkey
WaltS wrote:
Bug filed.
[985968 – Mozilla Plugin check page displays Java plugin as vulnerable
even if the latest version is
installed.](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=985968)
Thanks, Walt. I noticed this too.
--
Jaime A. Cruz
Nassau Wings Motorcycle Club
http
On 3/23/2014 3:22 AM, WaltS wrote:
On 03/22/2014 09:50 PM, Desiree wrote:
Mozilla's check your plugins page is claiming that Java 7 update 51 is
outdated. This is on my XP Pro machine using the latest version of
SeaMonkey.
Java 8 is out only at Oracle's download page (not on java.com
On 3/23/2014 4:46 AM, WaltS wrote:
On 03/22/2014 09:50 PM, Desiree wrote:
Mozilla's check your plugins page is claiming that Java 7 update 51 is
outdated. This is on my XP Pro machine using the latest version of
SeaMonkey.
Java 8 is out only at Oracle's download page (not on java.com
Mozilla's check your plugins page is claiming that Java 7 update 51 is
outdated. This is on my XP Pro machine using the latest version of
SeaMonkey.
Java 8 is out only at Oracle's download page (not on java.com for
several more weeks). Further, Oracle is NOT supporting Java 8 on XP
Interviewed by CNN on 22/03/2014 22:50, Desiree told the world:
Mozilla's check your plugins page is claiming that Java 7 update 51 is
outdated. This is on my XP Pro machine using the latest version of
SeaMonkey.
Java 8 is out only at Oracle's download page (not on java.com for
several
On 3/22/2014 6:50 PM, Desiree wrote:
Mozilla's check your plugins page is claiming that Java 7 update 51 is
outdated. This is on my XP Pro machine using the latest version of
SeaMonkey.
Java 8 is out only at Oracle's download page (not on java.com for
several more weeks). Further
I can not get the Mozilla family to load in the Java console. I have
uninstalled Seamonkey and java, gone through the registry to remove all the
java references, defragged the hard drive and D/L Seamonkey and Java again.
Even if I install Seamonkey (after removing all my info) I still can
Ted Campanelli wrote:
I can not get the Mozilla family to load in the Java console. I have
uninstalled Seamonkey and java, gone through the registry to remove all the
java references, defragged the hard drive and D/L Seamonkey and Java again.
Even if I install Seamonkey (after removing all
On 10/21/2013 6:33 PM, regz91 wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
requently visit two particular Web sites that use Java. Is there
some way to allow the use of Java on those sites without having to
activate the plugin manually each time? If there is no whitelist, how
do I always activate
I frequently visit two particular Web sites that use Java. Is there
some way to allow the use of Java on those sites without having to
activate the plugin manually each time? If there is no whitelist, how
do I always activate it?
--
David E. Ross
http://www.rossde.com/
Where does your elected
David E. Ross wrote:
requently visit two particular Web sites that use Java. Is there
some way to allow the use of Java on those sites without having to
activate the plugin manually each time? If there is no whitelist, how
do I always activate it?
--
it is possible. Try
https
David E. Ross wrote:
On 9/13/13 3:18 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
When I visit the site you link, I'm prompted Do you want to run
this application? ..., just as you say. If I check the box saying
I understand the risk, the Run button is enabled and I can give
it the go-ahead. Then your page
El 13/09/13 21:41, David E. Ross escribió:
Windows XP SP3
SeaMonkey 2.20
Java 7 u40 (7.0.400.43)
Certain Web sites that I have visited for quite a few years use Java.
Now, whenever I visit any those sites for the first time after a fresh
launching of SeaMonkey, I get a dialogue popup
Ricardo Palomares Martínez rpm.no...@proyectonave.es wrote:
El 13/09/13 21:41, David E. Ross escribió:
Windows XP SP3
SeaMonkey 2.20
Java 7 u40 (7.0.400.43)
Certain Web sites that I have visited for quite a few years use Java.
Now, whenever I visit any those sites for the first time after
El 14/09/13 12:12, Rob escribió:
Another bug failure of the whole signed code concept is that even
if it is implemented completely correctly, it only tells you who wrote
the code (even if a name is a unique identification of that person or
entity), it does not tell you what the code is going
Windows XP SP3
SeaMonkey 2.20
Java 7 u40 (7.0.400.43)
Certain Web sites that I have visited for quite a few years use Java.
Now, whenever I visit any those sites for the first time after a fresh
launching of SeaMonkey, I get a dialogue popup that says:
Do you want to run this application
David E. Ross wrote:
Windows XP SP3
SeaMonkey 2.20
Java 7 u40 (7.0.400.43)
Certain Web sites that I have visited for quite a few years use Java.
Now, whenever I visit any those sites for the first time after a fresh
launching of SeaMonkey, I get a dialogue popup that says:
Do you want to run
On 9/13/13 1:13 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
Windows XP SP3
SeaMonkey 2.20
Java 7 u40 (7.0.400.43)
Certain Web sites that I have visited for quite a few years use Java.
Now, whenever I visit any those sites for the first time after a fresh
launching of SeaMonkey, I
David E. Ross wrote:
On 9/13/13 1:13 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
Windows XP SP3
SeaMonkey 2.20
Java 7 u40 (7.0.400.43)
Certain Web sites that I have visited for quite a few years use Java.
Now, whenever I visit any those sites for the first time after a fresh
launching
On 9/13/13 3:18 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 9/13/13 1:13 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
Windows XP SP3
SeaMonkey 2.20
Java 7 u40 (7.0.400.43)
Certain Web sites that I have visited for quite a few years use Java.
Now, whenever I visit any those
Original Message
I just upgraded from SM 2.15 to 2.20. Now, when I activate java (default
state being inactive) , the browser overrides my selection. What do I
need to do to gain control over my own computing decisions?
Fixed, but I'm not very happy with what SeaMonkey has
Original Message
Original Message
I just upgraded from SM 2.15 to 2.20. Now, when I activate java (default
state being inactive) , the browser overrides my selection. What do I
need to do to gain control over my own computing decisions?
Fixed, but I'm
On 08/29/2013 11:27 AM, Roger Fink wrote:
Original Message
I just upgraded from SM 2.15 to 2.20. Now, when I activate java (default
state being inactive) , the browser overrides my selection. What do I
need to do to gain control over my own computing decisions?
Fixed
On 8/29/13 8:34 AM, Roger Fink wrote:
Original Message
Original Message
I just upgraded from SM 2.15 to 2.20. Now, when I activate java (default
state being inactive) , the browser overrides my selection. What do I
need to do to gain control over my
Original Message
On 8/29/13 8:34 AM, Roger Fink wrote:
Original Message
Original Message
I just upgraded from SM 2.15 to 2.20. Now, when I activate java (default
state being inactive) , the browser overrides my selection. What do I
need
On 8/30/13 2:14 AM +0900, Roger Fink wrote:
Original Message
On 8/29/13 8:34 AM, Roger Fink wrote:
Original Message
Original Message
I just upgraded from SM 2.15 to 2.20. Now, when I activate java (default
state being inactive
I just upgraded from SM 2.15 to 2.20. Now, when I activate java (default
state being inactive) , the browser overrides my selection. What do I
need to do to gain control over my own computing decisions?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support
Original Message
I just upgraded from SM 2.15 to 2.20. Now, when I activate java (default
state being inactive) , the browser overrides my selection. What do I
need to do to gain control over my own computing decisions?
Note that one solution that used to work
1 - 100 of 515 matches
Mail list logo
