G. Ross wrote:
Ant wrote:
On 11/18/2020 8:38 AM, Dirk Fieldhouse wrote:
On 18/11/2020 15:16, Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote:
G. Ross wrote:
Just started using the latest SM and when visiting local weather a
message popped up saying I need JavaScript to view it. Should I
install Javascript
On 11/19/20 12:29 AM, G. Ross wrote:
Ant wrote:
On 11/18/2020 8:38 AM, Dirk Fieldhouse wrote:
On 18/11/2020 15:16, Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote:
G. Ross wrote:
Just started using the latest SM and when visiting local weather a
message popped up saying I need JavaScript to view it. Should
On 2020-11-19, Yamo' wrote:
> Hi,
> G. Ross a tapoté le 19/11/2020 06:29:
>>> G. Ross, what's the weather web site? Do you have its exact URL you saw
>>> this issue?
>>>
>> https://www.13wmaz.com/radar
>>
>
>
> Access denied whith Seamonkey and Chromium.
That looks like Akamai's blacklisting
Hi,
G. Ross a tapoté le 19/11/2020 06:29:
>> G. Ross, what's the weather web site? Do you have its exact URL you saw
>> this issue?
>>
> https://www.13wmaz.com/radar
>
Access denied whith Seamonkey and Chromium.
--
Stéphane
Sorry for possible mistakes in English!
Ant wrote:
On 11/18/2020 8:38 AM, Dirk Fieldhouse wrote:
On 18/11/2020 15:16, Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote:
G. Ross wrote:
Just started using the latest SM and when visiting local weather a
message popped up saying I need JavaScript to view it. Should I
install Javascript and if so how
On 11/18/2020 8:38 AM, Dirk Fieldhouse wrote:
On 18/11/2020 15:16, Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote:
G. Ross wrote:
Just started using the latest SM and when visiting local weather a
message popped up saying I need JavaScript to view it. Should I
install Javascript and if so how to get
On 18/11/2020 15:16, Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote:
G. Ross wrote:
Just started using the latest SM and when visiting local weather a
message popped up saying I need JavaScript to view it. Should I
install Javascript and if so how to get it? Thanks.
G.Ross
Javascript (as opposed to Java
G. Ross wrote:
Just started using the latest SM and when visiting local weather a
message popped up saying I need JavaScript to view it. Should I install
Javascript and if so how to get it? Thanks.
G.Ross
Javascript (as opposed to Java) is natively supported by pretty much all
browsers
Just started using the latest SM and when visiting local weather a
message popped up saying I need JavaScript to view it. Should I
install Javascript and if so how to get it? Thanks.
G.Ross
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey
On 15/01/20 06:40, Daniel wrote:
Dirk Fieldhouse wrote on 15/01/2020 2:15 AM:
On 14/01/20 08:20, Daniel wrote:
mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote on 13/01/2020 1:38 AM:
Don't know if it leads anywhere but . "wyciwyg" as in "What You
C(See) Is What You Get"!!
C = Cache
...
n
caching and something JavaScript is doing on those pages.
I'm using SeaMonkey 2.49.5 on Linux Mint.
Don't know if it leads anywhere but . "wyciwyg" as in "What You
C(See) Is What You Get"!!
C = Cache
This discussion from 2010
<https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/q
On 14/01/20 08:20, Daniel wrote:
mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote on 13/01/2020 1:38 AM:
Not sure. The presence of "wyciwyg" in the page source when it's
failing to load looks like it could be some interaction between
caching and something JavaScript is doing on t
mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote on 13/01/2020 1:38 AM:
Not sure. The presence of "wyciwyg" in the page source when it's
failing to load looks like it could be some interaction between caching
and something JavaScript is doing on those pages.
I'm using SeaMonkey 2.49.
On 01/12/2020 11:11 AM, Dirk Fieldhouse wrote:
On 12/01/20 12:38, Richard Owlett wrote:
I'm running SeaMonkey version 2.49.4 [Build identifier: 20180711182954]
under Debian 9.8 [Stretch]
I routinely surf with JavaScript disabled without problems.
I have problems following *ANY* link from
On 01/12/2020 08:38 AM, mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote:
Richard Owlett wrote:
I'm running SeaMonkey version 2.49.4 [Build identifier: 20180711182954]
under Debian 9.8 [Stretch]
I routinely surf with JavaScript disabled without problems.
I have problems following *ANY* link from
On 12/01/20 12:38, Richard Owlett wrote:
I'm running SeaMonkey version 2.49.4 [Build identifier: 20180711182954]
under Debian 9.8 [Stretch]
I routinely surf with JavaScript disabled without problems.
I have problems following *ANY* link from https://manpages.debian.org/
*IF AND ONLY
Richard Owlett wrote:
I'm running SeaMonkey version 2.49.4 [Build identifier: 20180711182954]
under Debian 9.8 [Stretch]
I routinely surf with JavaScript disabled without problems.
I have problems following *ANY* link from https://manpages.debian.org/
*IF AND ONLY IF* JavaScript is enabled
Richard Owlett wrote:
> I'm running SeaMonkey version 2.49.4 [Build identifier: 20180711182954]
> under Debian 9.8 [Stretch]
>
> I routinely surf with JavaScript disabled without problems.
>
> I have problems following *ANY* link from https://manpages.debian.org/
> *IF AN
I'm running SeaMonkey version 2.49.4 [Build identifier: 20180711182954]
under Debian 9.8 [Stretch]
I routinely surf with JavaScript disabled without problems.
I have problems following *ANY* link from https://manpages.debian.org/
*IF AND ONLY IF* JavaScript is enabled.
The symptoms are:
1
On 12/9/2017 11:25 AM, EE wrote:
> David E. Ross wrote:
>> Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 (x64)
>> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
>> SeaMonkey/2.49.1 (installed more than a month ago)
>>
>> Some Web sites make very annoying use of JavaS
David E. Ross wrote:
Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 (x64)
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.49.1 (installed more than a month ago)
Some Web sites make very annoying use of JavaScript, so I disable
JavaScript when viewing those sites. Within the past two
On 12/8/17, David E. Ross <nobody@nowhere.invalid> wrote:
> Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 (x64)
> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
> SeaMonkey/2.49.1 (installed more than a month ago)
>
> Some Web sites make very annoying use of JavaScript, so I disa
Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 (x64)
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.49.1 (installed more than a month ago)
Some Web sites make very annoying use of JavaScript, so I disable
JavaScript when viewing those sites. Within the past two days, however,
the text
Mason83 <root@dom.invalid> writes:
>
>
> There is no actual content in the version for SM.
>
> Regards.
I don't understand all that. I have repeated the test. I disable
javascript using the prefbar addon, I click on the link, I type ctrl-u
and I can
confirmed by looking at the page source.
>
> There is text, and it can be seen without javascript, by pressing
> ctrl-u. It's just hard to see in all the html etc. It can be seen by
> using wget, and then running the page through html2text, or by using
> w3m, or lynx.
To be very spe
, and it can be seen without javascript, by pressing
ctrl-u. It's just hard to see in all the html etc. It can be seen by
using wget, and then running the page through html2text, or by using
w3m, or lynx.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamo
Paul in Houston, TX wrote:
Richmond wrote:
If I visit this page:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/federicoguerrini/2017/01/30/how-is-the-internet-doing-mozillas-ambitious-check-up-effort/
with Seamonkey (2.49a2) and javascript disabled, it displays a blank
page. However if I visit it with a text
Richmond wrote:
If I visit this page:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/federicoguerrini/2017/01/30/how-is-the-internet-doing-mozillas-ambitious-check-up-effort/
with Seamonkey (2.49a2) and javascript disabled, it displays a blank
page. However if I visit it with a text browser, e.g. w3m or lynx, I
Mason83 <root@dom.invalid> writes:
> On 30/01/2017 23:46, Richmond wrote:
>> If I visit this page:
>>
>> http://www.forbes.com/sites/federicoguerrini/2017/01/30/how-is-the-internet-doing-mozillas-ambitious-check-up-effort/
>>
>> with Seamonkey (2.49a
us-check-up-effort/
>>>
>>> with Seamonkey (2.49a2) and javascript disabled, it displays a blank
>>> page. However if I visit it with a text browser, e.g. w3m or lynx, I
>>> can read the story. Wouldn't it be useful if SM displayed the text?
>>>
>&g
On 31/01/2017 00:14, WaltS48 wrote:
> On 01/30/2017 05:46 PM, Richmond wrote:
>> If I visit this page:
>>
>> http://www.forbes.com/sites/federicoguerrini/2017/01/30/how-is-the-internet-doing-mozillas-ambitious-check-up-effort/
>>
>> with Seamonkey (2.49a2) and
On 01/30/2017 05:46 PM, Richmond wrote:
If I visit this page:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/federicoguerrini/2017/01/30/how-is-the-internet-doing-mozillas-ambitious-check-up-effort/
with Seamonkey (2.49a2) and javascript disabled, it displays a blank
page. However if I visit it with a text
On 31/01/2017 00:05, Mason83 wrote:
> On 30/01/2017 23:46, Richmond wrote:
>> If I visit this page:
>>
>> http://www.forbes.com/sites/federicoguerrini/2017/01/30/how-is-the-internet-doing-mozillas-ambitious-check-up-effort/
>>
>> with Seamonkey (2.49a2) and javascr
On 30/01/2017 23:46, Richmond wrote:
> If I visit this page:
>
> http://www.forbes.com/sites/federicoguerrini/2017/01/30/how-is-the-internet-doing-mozillas-ambitious-check-up-effort/
>
> with Seamonkey (2.49a2) and javascript disabled, it displays a blank
> page.
If I visit this page:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/federicoguerrini/2017/01/30/how-is-the-internet-doing-mozillas-ambitious-check-up-effort/
with Seamonkey (2.49a2) and javascript disabled, it displays a blank
page. However if I visit it with a text browser, e.g. w3m or lynx, I can
read the story
Works fine in 2.48 beta and 2.50a1. Could you check with a new profile
and or safe mode.
FRG
Stephan Thiele wrote:
When opening
https://hoax-info.tubit.tu-berlin.de/software/emailencoder.shtml,
Seamonkey (Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101
Firefox/49.0 SeaMonkey/2.46)
On 1/19/2017 12:52 PM, Stephan Thiele wrote:
> When opening
> https://hoax-info.tubit.tu-berlin.de/software/emailencoder.shtml, Seamonkey
> (Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/49.0
> SeaMonkey/2.46) first gives a warning (script seems to be busy) and then
> crashes.
When opening
https://hoax-info.tubit.tu-berlin.de/software/emailencoder.shtml, Seamonkey
(Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/49.0
SeaMonkey/2.46) first gives a warning (script seems to be busy) and then
crashes. Can anybody reproduce this behavior? Any solutions? The
ane (Available Items) of the PrefBar window, locate
> Javascript (Tab). Drag it into the right pane (Enabled Items) at a
> location you prefer.
>
> 4. Click the OK button.
Well I never. I had PrefBar installed, but I didn't know about that
extra option. I did
On 12/26/2016 10:17 AM, EE wrote:
> Richmond wrote:
>> I had an idea for a useful addition to seamonkey. An option to create a
>> new javascript free tab. This would mean the javascript on/off flag
>> would need to be per tab.
>>
>> I am aware of noscript, but i
Richmond wrote:
I had an idea for a useful addition to seamonkey. An option to create a
new javascript free tab. This would mean the javascript on/off flag
would need to be per tab.
I am aware of noscript, but it doesn't work the same way. Some tasks,
like reading the news, don't need
On 12/26/2016 3:25 AM, Richmond wrote:
> I had an idea for a useful addition to seamonkey. An option to create a
> new javascript free tab. This would mean the javascript on/off flag
> would need to be per tab.
>
> I am aware of noscript, but it doesn't work the same way. Som
On 26/12/2016 12:25, Richmond wrote:
> I had an idea for a useful addition to seamonkey. An option to create a
> new javascript free tab. This would mean the javascript on/off flag
> would need to be per tab.
>
> I am aware of noscript, but it doesn't work the same way. Som
I had an idea for a useful addition to seamonkey. An option to create a
new javascript free tab. This would mean the javascript on/off flag
would need to be per tab.
I am aware of noscript, but it doesn't work the same way. Some tasks,
like reading the news, don't need javascript and are better
On 28/02/2016 5:47 AM, David E. Ross wrote:
On 2/26/2016 9:34 AM, Alexandre Yudenitsch wrote:
Daniel wrote, onem 26 feb 16 05:08:
On 26/02/2016 5:46 AM, EE wrote:
O.K., so as I (and I expect a heck of a lot of others) don't have the
Live HTTP Headers *ADD-ON* installed, I would have no idea
On 28/02/2016 3:56 AM, Ed Mullen wrote:
Daniel wrote on 2/27/2016 5:01 AM:
On 27/02/2016 4:34 AM, Alexandre Yudenitsch wrote:
Daniel wrote, onem 26 feb 16 05:08:
On 26/02/2016 5:46 AM, EE wrote:
O.K., so as I (and I expect a heck of a lot of others) don't have the
Live HTTP Headers *ADD-ON*
On 2/26/2016 9:34 AM, Alexandre Yudenitsch wrote:
> Daniel wrote, onem 26 feb 16 05:08:
>
>> On 26/02/2016 5:46 AM, EE wrote:
>>
>> O.K., so as I (and I expect a heck of a lot of others) don't have the
>> Live HTTP Headers *ADD-ON* installed, I would have no idea what is going
>> on. Alexandre
Daniel wrote on 2/27/2016 5:01 AM:
On 27/02/2016 4:34 AM, Alexandre Yudenitsch wrote:
Daniel wrote, onem 26 feb 16 05:08:
On 26/02/2016 5:46 AM, EE wrote:
O.K., so as I (and I expect a heck of a lot of others) don't have the
Live HTTP Headers *ADD-ON* installed, I would have no idea what is
On 27/02/2016 4:34 AM, Alexandre Yudenitsch wrote:
Daniel wrote, onem 26 feb 16 05:08:
On 26/02/2016 5:46 AM, EE wrote:
O.K., so as I (and I expect a heck of a lot of others) don't have the
Live HTTP Headers *ADD-ON* installed, I would have no idea what is going
on. Alexandre makes no mention
Ray_Net wrote:
EE wrote on 25/02/2016 19:43:
Ray_Net wrote:
EE wrote on 24/02/2016 22:35:
"Link Behaviour" is basically tabs versus windows. A referrer is
information that a browser sends when following links or picking up
images to the site where the file is being requested, telling it
Daniel wrote, onem 26 feb 16 05:08:
On 26/02/2016 5:46 AM, EE wrote:
O.K., so as I (and I expect a heck of a lot of others) don't have the
Live HTTP Headers *ADD-ON* installed, I would have no idea what is going
on. Alexandre makes no mention of it, but I guess it is possible
Alexandre does
On 26/02/2016 5:46 AM, EE wrote:
Daniel wrote:
On 25/02/2016 10:37 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
EE wrote on 24/02/2016 22:35:
"Link Behaviour" is basically tabs versus windows. A referrer is
information that a browser sends when following links or picking up
images to the site where the file is being
Mason83 wrote on 25/02/2016 13:16:
On 24/02/2016 00:11, Alexandre Yudenitsch wrote:
EE wrote, on 23 Feb 16 15:16:
Are you blocking referers? If a site will not respond to clicks on
links, that could be the problem. If you are using RefControl, you can
make exceptions to blocking for
EE wrote on 25/02/2016 19:43:
Ray_Net wrote:
EE wrote on 24/02/2016 22:35:
"Link Behaviour" is basically tabs versus windows. A referrer is
information that a browser sends when following links or picking up
images to the site where the file is being requested, telling it where
the browser
Ray_Net wrote:
EE wrote on 24/02/2016 22:35:
"Link Behaviour" is basically tabs versus windows. A referrer is
information that a browser sends when following links or picking up
images to the site where the file is being requested, telling it where
the browser came from. I use RefControl to
Daniel wrote:
On 25/02/2016 10:37 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
EE wrote on 24/02/2016 22:35:
"Link Behaviour" is basically tabs versus windows. A referrer is
information that a browser sends when following links or picking up
images to the site where the file is being requested, telling it where
the
On 23/02/2016 01:17, Alexandre Yudenitsch wrote:
> Could it be some 'leftover' in one of the many SM Profile configuration
> files (perhaps even "preferences.js")? Maybe some cookies or
> 'super-cookies' are responsible, and the problem will go away when they
> expire (this because, even after
On 24/02/2016 00:11, Alexandre Yudenitsch wrote:
> EE wrote, on 23 Feb 16 15:16:
>
>> Are you blocking referers? If a site will not respond to clicks on
>> links, that could be the problem. If you are using RefControl, you can
>> make exceptions to blocking for particular sites.
>
> I don't
On 25/02/2016 10:37 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
EE wrote on 24/02/2016 22:35:
"Link Behaviour" is basically tabs versus windows. A referrer is
information that a browser sends when following links or picking up
images to the site where the file is being requested, telling it where
the browser came
EE wrote, on 24 Feb 16 18:35:
Are you blocking referers? If a site will not respond to clicks on
links, that could be the problem. If you are using RefControl, you can
make exceptions to blocking for particular sites.
I don't know what you mean: 'Link Behavior' in SM Preferences doesn't
say
EE wrote on 24/02/2016 22:35:
"Link Behaviour" is basically tabs versus windows. A referrer is
information that a browser sends when following links or picking up
images to the site where the file is being requested, telling it where
the browser came from. I use RefControl to block third
Alexandre Yudenitsch wrote:
EE wrote, on 23 Feb 16 15:16:
Are you blocking referers? If a site will not respond to clicks on
links, that could be the problem. If you are using RefControl, you can
make exceptions to blocking for particular sites.
I don't know what you mean: 'Link Behavior'
EE wrote, on 23 Feb 16 15:16:
Are you blocking referers? If a site will not respond to clicks on
links, that could be the problem. If you are using RefControl, you can
make exceptions to blocking for particular sites.
I don't know what you mean: 'Link Behavior' in SM Preferences doesn't
David E. Ross wrote, on 22 feb 16 21:35:
I noticed that certain Web sites appear to use JavaScript in a way that
PrefBar's "Javascript (Tab)" checkbox does not really accomplish what I
expect. The most blatant is the Canadian news site
<http://www.thestarphoenix.com/> for
Alexandre Yudenitsch wrote:
I've used PrefBar in SM since V3 at least, and have allowed JavaScript
for most options in the browser (not mail/news). More recently, I
started using AdBlockPlus, and it seemed to work well, with no ill effects.
For a few months now I noticed problems with sites
On 2/22/2016 4:17 PM, Alexandre Yudenitsch wrote:
> I've used PrefBar in SM since V3 at least, and have allowed JavaScript
> for most options in the browser (not mail/news). More recently, I
> started using AdBlockPlus, and it seemed to work well, with no ill effects.
>
> For a f
I've used PrefBar in SM since V3 at least, and have allowed JavaScript
for most options in the browser (not mail/news). More recently, I
started using AdBlockPlus, and it seemed to work well, with no ill effects.
For a few months now I noticed problems with sites which apparently used
kbr...@gmail.com wrote:
How do I fix the "Try watching this video on www.youtube.com, or
enable JavaScript if it is disabled in your browser" in Seamonkey
mail?
I DO have javascrip enabled under Preferences - Advanced - Scripts &
Plugins.
In both places in that d
How do I fix the "Try watching this video on www.youtube.com, or enable
JavaScript if it is disabled in your browser" in Seamonkey mail?
I DO have javascrip enabled under Preferences - Advanced - Scripts & Plugins.
Thanks.
___
sup
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
kbr...@gmail.com wrote:
How do I fix the "Try watching this video on www.youtube.com, or
enable JavaScript if it is disabled in your browser" in Seamonkey
mail?
I DO have javascrip enabled under Preferences - Advanced - Scripts &
Plugins.
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
And I'm not entirely happy with the HTML5 performance I'm getting from
SeaMonkey; Flash videos seem to be much better behaved. So if the OP has
a way of choosing Flash over HTML5 (assuming he has Flash installed
correctly), he might get better results.
I would not
Jonathan N. Little wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
kbr...@gmail.com wrote:
How do I fix the "Try watching this video on www.youtube.com, or
enable JavaScript if it is disabled in your browser" in Seamonkey
mail?
I DO have javascrip enabled under Preferences - Advanced - Scripts
Jonathan N. Little wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
And I'm not entirely happy with the HTML5 performance I'm getting
from SeaMonkey; Flash videos seem to be much better behaved. So if
the OP has a way of choosing Flash over HTML5 (assuming he has
Flash installed correctly), he might get
Jonathan N. Little wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Jonathan N. Little wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
And I'm not entirely happy with the HTML5 performance I'm getting
from SeaMonkey; Flash videos seem to be much better behaved. So if
the OP has a way of choosing Flash over HTML5 (assuming
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Jonathan N. Little wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
And I'm not entirely happy with the HTML5 performance I'm getting
from SeaMonkey; Flash videos seem to be much better behaved. So if
the OP has a way of choosing Flash over HTML5 (assuming he has
Flash installed
On 04/02/2016 04:44, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
> Jonathan N. Little wrote:
>> Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
>>> Jonathan N. Little wrote:
>>>
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
>
> And I'm not entirely happy with the HTML5 performance I'm getting
> from SeaMonkey; Flash videos seem to be much
On 11/21/14, stan pierce s.c.pie...@comcast.net wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
stan pierce wrote:
Is there some very straightforward way to install JavaScript. How do I
know if I should use 32 or 64 bit. My machine is a 64 bit machine.
JavaScript comes with/within the browser. You
David E. Ross wrote:
On 11/21/2014 5:17 PM, stan pierce wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 11/21/2014 4:36 PM, stan pierce wrote:
Is there some very straightforward way to install JavaScript. How do I
know if I should use 32 or 64 bit. My machine is a 64 bit machine.
---
This email has been
On 11/22/2014 08:47 AM, stan pierce wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 11/21/2014 5:17 PM, stan pierce wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 11/21/2014 4:36 PM, stan pierce wrote:
Is there some very straightforward way to install JavaScript. How
do I
know if I should use 32 or 64 bit. My machine
stan pierce wrote:
Is there some very straightforward way to install JavaScript. How do I
know if I should use 32 or 64 bit. My machine is a 64 bit machine.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
There is no need to install javascript
Is there some very straightforward way to install JavaScript. How do I
know if I should use 32 or 64 bit. My machine is a 64 bit machine.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
___
support
stan pierce wrote:
Is there some very straightforward way to install JavaScript. How do I
know if I should use 32 or 64 bit. My machine is a 64 bit machine.
JavaScript comes with/within the browser. You don't need to install
anything else. Unless you mean you want to install something
On 11/21/2014 4:36 PM, stan pierce wrote:
Is there some very straightforward way to install JavaScript. How do I
know if I should use 32 or 64 bit. My machine is a 64 bit machine.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
1. Java
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
stan pierce wrote:
Is there some very straightforward way to install JavaScript. How do I
know if I should use 32 or 64 bit. My machine is a 64 bit machine.
JavaScript comes with/within the browser. You don't need to install
anything else. Unless you mean you
David E. Ross wrote:
On 11/21/2014 4:36 PM, stan pierce wrote:
Is there some very straightforward way to install JavaScript. How do I
know if I should use 32 or 64 bit. My machine is a 64 bit machine.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
stan pierce wrote:
Is there some very straightforward way to install JavaScript. How do I
know if I should use 32 or 64 bit. My machine is a 64 bit machine.
JavaScript comes with/within the browser. You don't need to install
anything else. Unless you mean you
stan pierce wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
stan pierce wrote:
Is there some very straightforward way to install JavaScript. How do
I know if I should use 32 or 64 bit. My machine is a 64 bit machine.
JavaScript comes with/within the browser. You don't need to install
anything else
On 11/21/2014 5:17 PM, stan pierce wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 11/21/2014 4:36 PM, stan pierce wrote:
Is there some very straightforward way to install JavaScript. How do I
know if I should use 32 or 64 bit. My machine is a 64 bit machine.
---
This email has been checked for viruses
Today a java update borked my SeaMonkey 2.26.1 javascript (yes, I know:
Java/Javascript, two different things). By contrast FF Palemoon came
through it OK.
Even after uninstalling java completely this condition still remains,
and System Restore couldn't revert me past the point
On 20.08.2014 20:16, Roger Fink wrote:
..
If you have a young profile backup which is older than the defected by
java, why not first comparing the prefs.js files?
Make sure you have terminated SM!
If any relevant difference you could edit the defect prefs.js
(use an UTF-8 capable editor!)
prefs.js
(use an UTF-8 capable editor!)
Replacing prefs.js did the trick.
I've been using SeaMonkey since the very early days. Usually Firefox was
installed on the same machine. My subjective impression after having
this happen on a fair number of occasions is that javascript in
SeaMonkey
Original Message
Roger Fink wrote:
Original Message
JavaScript function seems to have vanished from SeaMonkey 2.25, even in
safe mode. What is the best way to get this back?
Note: I have in essence an identical installation on a second machine
Roger Fink wrote:
Original Message
JavaScript function seems to have vanished from SeaMonkey 2.25, even in
safe mode. What is the best way to get this back?
Note: I have in essence an identical installation on a second machine,
the main difference being the profile name
Original Message
JavaScript function seems to have vanished from SeaMonkey 2.25, even in
safe mode. What is the best way to get this back?
Note: I have in essence an identical installation on a second machine,
the main difference being the profile name, so I could probably
Original Message
Roger Fink wrote:
JavaScript function seems to have vanished from SeaMonkey 2.25, even in
safe mode. What is the best way to get this back?
Do you mean the ability to Enable or Disable JavaScript is missing, or
do you mean Pages with JavaScript do
Original Message
JavaScript function seems to have vanished from SeaMonkey 2.25, even in
safe mode. What is the best way to get this back?
Note: I have in essence an identical installation on a second machine,
the main difference being the profile name, so I could probably
JavaScript function seems to have vanished from SeaMonkey 2.25, even in
safe mode. What is the best way to get this back?
Note: I have in essence an identical installation on a second machine,
the main difference being the profile name, so I could probably
overwrite the corrupt file or files
On 12/24/2013 6:08 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/24/2013 3:48 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Please check out this page and tell me if it's me or if SeaMonkey has a
bug or if the site has a coding error. Thanks much.
On 12/28/2013 6:19 AM, Desiree wrote:
On 12/24/2013 6:08 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/24/2013 3:48 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Please check out this page and tell me if it's me or if SeaMonkey has a
bug or if the site has a coding error. Thanks much.
WaltS wrote:
On 12/24/2013 11:08 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 12/24/2013 3:48 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Please check out this page and tell me if it's me or if SeaMonkey has a
bug or if the site has a coding error. Thanks much.
1 - 100 of 225 matches
Mail list logo
