2.26.1 was/is the last version which
displayed graphics and attachments in newsgroups correctly.
Using Mac OS X Version 10.9.5
If anyone else has encountered same problem and found a solution, would
appreciate the solution.
TIA
Is there a Bugzilla bug filed? If so, what status is marked against
graphics and attachments in newsgroups correctly.
Using Mac OS X Version 10.9.5
If anyone else has encountered same problem and found a solution, would
appreciate the solution.
TIA
Is there a Bugzilla bug filed? If so, what status is marked against it?
This has gone on for how long now? I'd
graphics and attachments in newsgroups correctly.
Using Mac OS X Version 10.9.5
If anyone else has encountered same problem and found a solution, would
appreciate the solution.
TIA
As you've noted here, it's been broken in every version since 2.26.1.
It's has been reported, but has not been
and
attachments in newsgroups correctly.
Using Mac OS X Version 10.9.5
If anyone else has encountered same problem and found a solution, would
appreciate the solution.
TIA
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
cmcadams wrote:
Geoff Welsh wrote:
for a long time, I have tried to remember, that, I should
detach/delete pictures sent
to me as attachments to messages. But, it just dawned on me that
every time I have
SENT a picture, as an attachment, that picture is saved in my Sent
Folder
Geoff Welsh wrote:
for a long time, I have tried to remember, that, I should detach/delete
pictures sent
to me as attachments to messages. But, it just dawned on me that every time I
have
SENT a picture, as an attachment, that picture is saved in my Sent Folder.
Is there a setting to make
for a long time, I have tried to remember, that, I should detach/delete
pictures sent to me as attachments to messages. But, it just dawned on
me that every time I have SENT a picture, as an attachment, that picture
is saved in my Sent Folder.
Is there a setting to make that not permanent
Hello:
For the past month or more, I have been having trouble downloading
emails with attachments. Messages with attachments as small as 1.1MB
lockup the download process and even download multiple times. Never
getting past the email backing up the message.
Thanks,
Joe Wright
--
Joseph S
go daddy is not supporting mail attachments above 1 MB. do you know the
solution please advice
On Sunday, May 4, 2014 11:37:14 PM UTC+4, flyguy wrote:
The last two weeks or so, I've been unable to reliably send emails with
attachments over 1 MB or so. Under 1 MB, and it sends normally
sharjah.knan...@gmail.com wrote:
go daddy is not supporting mail attachments above 1 MB. do you know the
solution please advice
On Sunday, May 4, 2014 11:37:14 PM UTC+4, flyguy wrote:
The last two weeks or so, I've been unable to reliably send emails with
attachments over 1 MB or so. Under 1
sharjah.knan...@gmail.com pounded out :
On Sunday, May 4, 2014 11:37:14 PM UTC+4, flyguy wrote:
The last two weeks or so, I've been unable to reliably send emails with
attachments over 1 MB or so. Under 1 MB, and it sends normally; from 1
to 2 MB, it might take several tries to send it; over
sharjah.knan...@gmail.com wrote:
go daddy is not supporting mail attachments above 1 MB. do you know the
solution please advice
I see three solutions:
Compress the attachment and send it.
Upload the file to a file hosting service such as Dropbox, or image
hosting service
How do I correct this?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
On 6/17/14 4:28 AM +0900, Steven Silvera wrote:
How do I correct this?
You tell your Outlook users to fix it. It's an age-old problem when
Outlook sends mail attachments via Exchange Server to Internet-based
recipients.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/958012
Steven Silvera wrote:
html
head
meta http-equiv=content-type content=text/html; charset=UTF-8
/head
body bgcolor=#FF text=#00
font face=Trebuchet MSHow do I correct this?br
/font
/body
/html
Are all these attachments being sent by Microsoft Outlook users
GerardJan wrote, On 16/06/2014 09:53:
sharjah.knan...@gmail.com wrote:
go daddy is not supporting mail attachments above 1 MB. do you know
the solution please advice
On Sunday, May 4, 2014 11:37:14 PM UTC+4, flyguy wrote:
The last two weeks or so, I've been unable to reliably send emails
ot;
font face="Trebuchet MS"How do I correct this?br
/font
/body
/html
Are all these attachments being sent by Microsoft Outlook users? That's
usually the cause, not your program.
Please post in Plain Text instead of HTML.
Please Modify the server instead of
Trane Francks wrote:
On 6/17/14 4:28 AM +0900, Steven Silvera wrote:
How do I correct this?
You tell your Outlook users to fix it. It's an age-old problem when Outlook
sends mail attachments via Exchange Server to Internet-based recipients.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/958012
Or, just
On 06/16/2014 07:07 AM, Ed Mullen wrote:
sharjah.knan...@gmail.com pounded out :
On Sunday, May 4, 2014 11:37:14 PM UTC+4, flyguy wrote:
The last two weeks or so, I've been unable to reliably send emails with
attachments over 1 MB or so. Under 1 MB, and it sends normally; from 1
to 2 MB
WaltS48 wrote:
sharjah.knan...@gmail.com wrote:
go daddy is not supporting mail attachments above 1 MB. do you know
the solution please advice
I see three solutions:
Compress the attachment and send it.
Upload the file to a file hosting service such as Dropbox, or image
hosting service
BIll Spikowski wrote:
Trane Francks wrote:
On 6/17/14 4:28 AM +0900, Steven Silvera wrote:
How do I correct this?
You tell your Outlook users to fix it. It's an age-old problem when
Outlook sends mail attachments via Exchange Server to Internet-based
recipients.
http://support.microsoft.com
these attachments being sent by Microsoft Outlook users? That's
usually the cause, not your program.
Please post in Plain Text instead of HTML.
Please Modify the server instead of blaming people.
On fr.text, if you try to post in html, you got this error:
A News (NNTP) error occurred: Invalid
weeks or so, I've been unable to reliably send emails
with
attachments over 1 MB or so. Under 1 MB, and it sends normally;
from 1
to 2 MB, it might take several tries to send it; over 2 MB, and it
won't
send at all. When it doesn't send, I get the error message:
Sending of message failed
to reliably send emails
with
attachments over 1 MB or so. Under 1 MB, and it sends normally;
from 1
to 2 MB, it might take several tries to send it; over 2 MB, and it
won't
send at all. When it doesn't send, I get the error message:
Sending of message failed. The message could not be sent because
Paul B. Gallagher wrote, On 5/7/2014 10:49 PM:
flyguy wrote:
Ray_Net wrote, On 5/5/2014 12:18 PM:
flyguy wrote, On 05/05/2014 17:00:
Cerise wrote, On 5/4/2014 5:54 PM:
On 5/4/2014 3:37 PM, flyguy wrote:
The last two weeks or so, I've been unable to reliably send emails
with
attachments over
Ray_Net wrote, On 5/5/2014 12:18 PM:
flyguy wrote, On 05/05/2014 17:00:
Cerise wrote, On 5/4/2014 5:54 PM:
On 5/4/2014 3:37 PM, flyguy wrote:
The last two weeks or so, I've been unable to reliably send emails with
attachments over 1 MB or so. Under 1 MB, and it sends normally; from 1
to 2 MB
On 5/8/14 12:55 PM +0900, flyguy wrote:
Ray_Net wrote, On 5/5/2014 12:18 PM:
flyguy wrote, On 05/05/2014 17:00:
Cerise wrote, On 5/4/2014 5:54 PM:
On 5/4/2014 3:37 PM, flyguy wrote:
The last two weeks or so, I've been unable to reliably send emails with
attachments over 1 MB or so. Under 1
flyguy wrote:
Ray_Net wrote, On 5/5/2014 12:18 PM:
flyguy wrote, On 05/05/2014 17:00:
Cerise wrote, On 5/4/2014 5:54 PM:
On 5/4/2014 3:37 PM, flyguy wrote:
The last two weeks or so, I've been unable to reliably send emails
with
attachments over 1 MB or so. Under 1 MB, and it sends normally
On 5/6/14 1:48 AM +0900, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Cerise wrote:
On 5/5/2014 5:49 AM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
The most obvious hypothesis is that the ISP changed its policy. But
that will have to be proven by the alternate-email-client test.
The most obvious is really that their SMTP
send the attachments - no problems.
* I can send big attachments using GoDaddy's webmail.
With each of those, you are sending either from a different machine,
or using different servers. You want to reduce the variables ... and
using a different mail client to connect to the same SMTP server
Godaddy
accounts on it, and they can all send the attachments - no problems.
* I can send big attachments using GoDaddy's webmail.
With each of those, you are sending either from a different machine,
or using different servers. You want to reduce the variables ... and
using a different mail client
On 5/5/2014 3:37 AM, Ron Hunter wrote:
Why not just contact the ISP and ask if there is a size limit on emails
sent on a POP account. Most do have size limits.
Because that's what happend in the first post, and ISP is saying it's
SeaMonkey. Trying another client is a way to push it back to
Cerise wrote, On 05/05/2014 09:47:
On 5/5/2014 3:37 AM, Ron Hunter wrote:
Why not just contact the ISP and ask if there is a size limit on emails
sent on a POP account. Most do have size limits.
Because that's what happend in the first post, and ISP is saying it's
SeaMonkey. Trying another
Ray_Net wrote:
Cerise wrote, On 05/05/2014 09:47:
On 5/5/2014 3:37 AM, Ron Hunter wrote:
Why not just contact the ISP and ask if there is a size limit on emails
sent on a POP account. Most do have size limits.
Because that's what happend in the first post, and ISP is saying it's
SeaMonkey.
On 5/5/2014 5:49 AM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
The most obvious hypothesis is that the ISP changed its policy. But that
will have to be proven by the alternate-email-client test.
The most obvious is really that their SMTP server is broken. The thread
starter is getting a timeout, not an SMTP
On 5/4/2014 3:37 PM, flyguy wrote:
I contacted Support at Godaddy, but after trying a number things, the
representative concluded it was likely a Mozilla issue. If it is, that
doesn't explain why it worked before.
So it seems that GoDaddy has been there before, with intermittent mail
Cerise wrote, On 5/4/2014 5:54 PM:
On 5/4/2014 3:37 PM, flyguy wrote:
The last two weeks or so, I've been unable to reliably send emails with
attachments over 1 MB or so. Under 1 MB, and it sends normally; from 1
to 2 MB, it might take several tries to send it; over 2 MB, and it won't
send
router, but with wifi) has the same Godaddy
accounts on it, and they can all send the attachments - no problems.
* I can send big attachments using GoDaddy's webmail.
With each of those, you are sending either from a different machine,
or using different servers. You want to reduce the variables
is saying it's
SeaMonkey. Trying another client is a way to push it back to them, so
they don't leave it broken.
A little detail Why in the first post, we see it worked before. ?
Yes, that's an odd thing: we've routinely sent 5 MB to 10 MB attachments
over the last couple of years, from both
Cerise wrote:
On 5/5/2014 5:49 AM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
The most obvious hypothesis is that the ISP changed its policy. But
that will have to be proven by the alternate-email-client test.
The most obvious is really that their SMTP server is broken. The
thread starter is getting a
flyguy wrote, On 05/05/2014 17:00:
Cerise wrote, On 5/4/2014 5:54 PM:
On 5/4/2014 3:37 PM, flyguy wrote:
The last two weeks or so, I've been unable to reliably send emails with
attachments over 1 MB or so. Under 1 MB, and it sends normally; from 1
to 2 MB, it might take several tries to send
(using the same router, but with wifi) has the same Godaddy
accounts on it, and they can all send the attachments - no problems.
* I can send big attachments using GoDaddy's webmail.
With each of those, you are sending either from a different machine,
or using different servers. You want
Ed Mullen wrote:
And don't forget there is email encoding overhead. An attachment that
is exactly 10 Mb would make and email larger than 10 Mb even if the
email has null content other than that.
..generally about 30% overhead. A 10Mb file would take about 13Mb to send
via email.
--
On 5/5/2014 10:07 AM, Cerise wrote:
On 5/4/2014 3:37 PM, flyguy wrote:
I contacted Support at Godaddy, but after trying a number things, the
representative concluded it was likely a Mozilla issue. If it is, that
doesn't explain why it worked before.
So it seems that GoDaddy has been there
Rick Merrill wrote:
If you are using an ISP and your correspondent is using the same ISP
then the ISP limit is all you have to worry about. But it is
possible that your correspondent is on a different ISP with a
different (lower) limit!
In that case, you would normally be able to send the
The last two weeks or so, I've been unable to reliably send emails with
attachments over 1 MB or so. Under 1 MB, and it sends normally; from 1
to 2 MB, it might take several tries to send it; over 2 MB, and it won't
send at all. When it doesn't send, I get the error message:
Sending
On 5/4/2014 3:37 PM, flyguy wrote:
The last two weeks or so, I've been unable to reliably send emails with
attachments over 1 MB or so. Under 1 MB, and it sends normally; from 1
to 2 MB, it might take several tries to send it; over 2 MB, and it won't
send at all. When it doesn't send, I get
flyguy wrote:
The last two weeks or so, I've been unable to reliably send emails with
attachments over 1 MB or so. Under 1 MB, and it sends normally; from 1
to 2 MB, it might take several tries to send it; over 2 MB, and it won't
send at all. When it doesn't send, I get the error message
Cerise wrote, On 5/4/2014 5:54 PM:
On 5/4/2014 3:37 PM, flyguy wrote:
The last two weeks or so, I've been unable to reliably send emails with
attachments over 1 MB or so. Under 1 MB, and it sends normally; from 1
to 2 MB, it might take several tries to send it; over 2 MB, and it won't
send
On 5/5/2014 12:18 AM, flyguy wrote:
Would these be satisfactory tests?
* My IMAP gmail account can send with no problems (done on the Win XP
computer)
* My iPad (using the same router, but with wifi) has the same Godaddy
accounts on it, and they can all send the attachments - no problems
Ant wrote:
Hello.
Is it normal for SeaMonkey to forward attachments as EMLs? I had one
receiver's e-mail server reject my e-mail because of my EML attachment.
Thank you in advance. :)
You can change how SeaMonkey forwards messages under Edit | Preferences
| Mail Newsgroups | Composition
as would replying.
In case receivers cannot open forwarded e-mail as attachments, the
alternative is to configure SeaMonkey to forward e-mail inline by
default.
How to do that ? I think that i have the forward in line by default ..
i think that never put a flag somewhere
does not lose the fancy tidbits as would replying.
In case receivers cannot open forwarded e-mail as attachments, the
alternative is to configure SeaMonkey to forward e-mail inline by
default.
How to do that ? I think that i have the forward in line by default
.. i think that never put a flag
.
In case receivers cannot open forwarded e-mail as attachments,
the alternative is to configure SeaMonkey to forward e-mail
inline by default.
How to do that ? I think that i have the "forward in line" by
default
On 4/7/14 9:41 AM +0900, Ant wrote:
On 4/6/2014 2:36 PM PT, Trane Francks typed:
...
PS - In the meantime, you can work around the problem with that
particular server's recipient by forwarding messages inline.
If I do inlined, then I lose the embedded images and stuff?
No, forwarding does
Ant wrote, On 07/04/2014 02:41:
On 4/6/2014 11:22 AM PT, Ray_Net typed:
Is it normal for SeaMonkey to forward attachments as EMLs? I had one
receiver's e-mail server reject my e-mail because of my EML attachment.
Thank you in advance. :)
Strangei have an email with a pdf attachment
My SeaMonkey 2.25 no longer has anything
in the text area when I try to forward, only an attachment that
outlook can't open which most of my friends use.
Trane Francks wrote:
On 4/7/14 9:41 AM +0900, Ant wrote:
On 4/6/2014 2:36 PM PT, Trane Francks
open forwarded e-mail as attachments, the
alternative is to configure SeaMonkey to forward e-mail inline by default.
--
/
// Trane Francks tr...@tranefrancks.com Tokyo, Japan
// Practice random kindness and senseless acts of beauty
Hello.
Is it normal for SeaMonkey to forward attachments as EMLs? I had one
receiver's e-mail server reject my e-mail because of my EML attachment.
Thank you in advance. :)
--
A marvelous creature. A model of specialization... Who else could suck
an ant up his nose and enjoy it? --About
Ant wrote, On 06/04/2014 18:44:
Hello.
Is it normal for SeaMonkey to forward attachments as EMLs? I had one
receiver's e-mail server reject my e-mail because of my EML attachment.
Thank you in advance. :)
Strangei have an email with a pdf attachment - If i forward it, i
got the same
Ant wrote:
Hello.
Is it normal for SeaMonkey to forward attachments as EMLs? I had one
receiver's e-mail server reject my e-mail because of my EML attachment.
Thank you in advance. :)
Sure, happens when you forward an email that contains no attachments of
its own. Stupid server, if you ask
On 4/7/14 6:35 AM +0900, Trane Francks wrote:
On 4/7/14 1:44 AM +0900, Ant wrote:
Hello.
Is it normal for SeaMonkey to forward attachments as EMLs? I had one
receiver's e-mail server reject my e-mail because of my EML attachment.
Thank you in advance. :)
This is perfectly normal
On 4/7/14 1:44 AM +0900, Ant wrote:
Hello.
Is it normal for SeaMonkey to forward attachments as EMLs? I had one
receiver's e-mail server reject my e-mail because of my EML attachment.
Thank you in advance. :)
This is perfectly normal and expected behaviour for forwarding mail
On 4/6/2014 9:44 AM PT, Ant typed:
Is it normal for SeaMonkey to forward attachments as EMLs? I had one
receiver's e-mail server reject my e-mail because of my EML attachment.
Also, I noticed forwarding plain text only e-mail/newsgroup post as an
attachment is still EML. See my screen shot
On 4/6/2014 11:22 AM PT, Ray_Net typed:
Is it normal for SeaMonkey to forward attachments as EMLs? I had one
receiver's e-mail server reject my e-mail because of my EML attachment.
Thank you in advance. :)
Strangei have an email with a pdf attachment - If i forward it, i
got the same pdf
On 4/6/2014 2:36 PM PT, Trane Francks typed:
...
PS - In the meantime, you can work around the problem with that
particular server's recipient by forwarding messages inline.
If I do inlined, then I lose the embedded images and stuff?
--
When the water rises the fish eat the ants, when the
Ant wrote:
On 4/6/2014 2:36 PM PT, Trane Francks typed:
...
PS - In the meantime, you can work around the problem with that
particular server's recipient by forwarding messages inline.
If I do inlined, then I lose the embedded images and stuff?
An HTML message forwarded inline remains an
save the .wav to the desktop
and play it with Quicktime just fine.
Was this a security enhancement? (no more playing message attachments
in the browser).
I'm using the same profile from my old machine, so I don't think a
setting could be the issue.
Any ideas how to make it work like it used
obviously wrong, since, I can save the .wav to the desktop
and play it with Quicktime just fine.
Was this a security enhancement? (no more playing message attachments
in the browser).
I'm using the same profile from my old machine, so I don't think a
setting could be the issue.
Any ideas how to make
it with Quicktime just fine.
Was this a security enhancement? (no more playing message attachments
in the browser).
I'm using the same profile from my old machine, so I don't think a
setting could be the issue.
Any ideas how to make it work like it used to?
GW
that the body and attachments are totally separate.
NOTE: This was a New Message.
AFAIK: Forwarding's options of Inline or Attached not involved.
--
JohnW-MN
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https
can that happen?
I always thought that the body and attachments are totally separate.
Forwards either be as separate attachments or inline, depending on settings.
I am aware of that with fowarded messages.
My problem was with a brand new message.
--
JohnW-MN
WinXP, SM 2.22.1
I had sent a copy of a message to myself and when looking at the copy I
received, the body of the message included text from files attached to the
message. How can that happen?
I always thought that the body and attachments are totally separate.
--
JohnW-MN
On 1/22/14 8:31 AM +0900, JohnW-Mpls wrote:
WinXP, SM 2.22.1
I had sent a copy of a message to myself and when looking at the copy I
received, the body of the message included text from files attached to the
message. How can that happen?
I always thought that the body and attachments
JohnW-Mpls wrote:
WinXP, SM 2.22.1
I had sent a copy of a message to myself and when looking at the copy I
received, the body of the message included text from files attached to
the message. How can that happen?
I always thought that the body and attachments are totally separate.
A guy
Whenever I am in an e-mail and click the print button to print it, the print
dialog box immediately appears and then disappears. If I reduce the size of
the e-mail (to the tool bar), the print dialog box appears and I can then click
OK. This has never happened before in any previous version
cdr...@ix.netcom.com:
Whenever I am in an e-mail and click the print button to print it, the print
dialog box immediately appears and then disappears. If I reduce the size of
the e-mail (to the tool bar), the print dialog box appears and I can then
click OK. This has never happened before in
Hartmut Figge wrote, On 21/10/2013 21:41:
cdr...@ix.netcom.com:
Whenever I am in an e-mail and click the print button to print it, the print
dialog box immediately appears and then disappears. If I reduce the size of
the e-mail (to the tool bar), the print dialog box appears and I can then
On 10/21/2013 05:16 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
Hartmut Figge wrote, On 21/10/2013 21:41:
cdr...@ix.netcom.com:
Whenever I am in an e-mail and click the print button to print it,
the print dialog box immediately appears and then disappears. If I
reduce the size of the e-mail (to the tool bar), the
Philip TAYLOR wrote:
An e-mail contains another e-mail as attachment, in .eml
format. Double-clicking on the .eml attachment in the
Attachments pane opens another instance of the Seamonkey
e-mail client, but both Print and Print preview
have zero effect.
Philip Taylor
Phillip, looking
An e-mail contains another e-mail as attachment, in .eml
format. Double-clicking on the .eml attachment in the
Attachments pane opens another instance of the Seamonkey
e-mail client, but both Print and Print preview
have zero effect.
Philip Taylor
Hello.
Is there a way to automatically save attachments from posts in a newsgroup?
I am subscribed to a local photography group and saving them one by one
is hard labour.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 07:51:23 +0100, Tihomir wrote in message
news:2uqdnfw0fod2c8_mnz2dnuvz_hgdn...@mozilla.org:
Hello.
Is there a way to automatically save attachments from posts in a newsgroup?
I am subscribed to a local photography group and saving them one by one
is hard labour.
I
Jane Galt wrote:
Ed Mullen e...@mungeedmullen.net wrote :
Ed Mullen wrote:
Jane Galt wrote:
My sister's PC ( Win 7 ) is using the latest SM and she uses the mail in
there. I don't because I've always used Pegasus, but she does.
And it's doing the weirdest thing.
I send her a PDF
Ed Mullen e...@mungeedmullen.net wrote :
Ed Mullen wrote:
Jane Galt wrote:
My sister's PC ( Win 7 ) is using the latest SM and she uses the mail in
there. I don't because I've always used Pegasus, but she does.
And it's doing the weirdest thing.
I send her a PDF attachment and when I
Ed Mullen wrote:
Jane Galt wrote:
My sister's PC ( Win 7 ) is using the latest SM and she uses the mail in
there. I don't because I've always used Pegasus, but she does.
And it's doing the weirdest thing.
I send her a PDF attachment and when I double click on it in her PC in
the SM
mail, it
On 12/26/12 8:43 AM, Ed Mullen wrote:
Ed Mullen wrote:
Jane Galt wrote:
My sister's PC ( Win 7 ) is using the latest SM and she uses the mail in
there. I don't because I've always used Pegasus, but she does.
And it's doing the weirdest thing.
I send her a PDF attachment and when I double
My sister's PC ( Win 7 ) is using the latest SM and she uses the mail in
there. I don't because I've always used Pegasus, but she does.
And it's doing the weirdest thing.
I send her a PDF attachment and when I double click on it in her PC in the SM
mail, it opens a blue screen in Windows Media
Jane Galt wrote:
My sister's PC ( Win 7 ) is using the latest SM and she uses the mail in
there. I don't because I've always used Pegasus, but she does.
And it's doing the weirdest thing.
I send her a PDF attachment and when I double click on it in her PC in the SM
mail, it opens a blue screen
Ed Mullen e...@mungeedmullen.net wrote :
Jane Galt wrote:
My sister's PC ( Win 7 ) is using the latest SM and she uses the mail
in there. I don't because I've always used Pegasus, but she does.
And it's doing the weirdest thing.
I send her a PDF attachment and when I double click on it in
On 12/25/12 7:24 PM, Jane Galt wrote:
Ed Mullen e...@mungeedmullen.net wrote :
Jane Galt wrote:
My sister's PC ( Win 7 ) is using the latest SM and she uses the mail
in there. I don't because I've always used Pegasus, but she does.
And it's doing the weirdest thing.
I send her a PDF
Le 7/11/2012, gfagan...@gmail.com a supposé :
Even when I chose 'Open' it asks where to save them. OS is Puppyt Linux.
Hello fellow puppy linux user.
What do you use? OpenOffice? LibrOffice? Abiword?
In the preferences of SeaMonkey, helper applications, you have to configure the
one you use.
Le 10/11/2012, NoOp a supposé :
On 11/09/2012 02:13 PM, Bernard Mercier wrote:
Le 7/11/2012, gfagan...@gmail.com a supposé :
Even when I chose 'Open' it asks where to save them. OS is Puppyt Linux.
Hello fellow puppy linux user.
What do you use? OpenOffice? LibrOffice? Abiword?
In the
On 11/11/2012 05:42 AM, Bernard Mercier wrote:
Le 10/11/2012, NoOp a supposé :
On 11/09/2012 02:13 PM, Bernard Mercier wrote:
Le 7/11/2012, gfagan...@gmail.com a supposé :
Even when I chose 'Open' it asks where to save them. OS is Puppyt Linux.
Hello fellow puppy linux user.
What do you
On 11/09/2012 02:13 PM, Bernard Mercier wrote:
Le 7/11/2012, gfagan...@gmail.com a supposé :
Even when I chose 'Open' it asks where to save them. OS is Puppyt Linux.
Hello fellow puppy linux user.
What do you use? OpenOffice? LibrOffice? Abiword?
In the preferences of SeaMonkey, helper
Even when I chose 'Open' it asks where to save them. OS is Puppyt Linux.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
gfagan...@gmail.com wrote:
Even when I chose 'Open' it asks where to save them. OS is Puppyt Linux.
Do you have a suitable handler installed ? Microsoft Word would be the
handler of choice under Microsoft Windows; no idea what the equivalent
(if any) might be for a Linux-based system.
Philip TAYLOR wrote:
gfagan...@gmail.com wrote:
Even when I chose 'Open' it asks where to save them. OS is Puppyt
Linux.
Do you have a suitable handler installed ? Microsoft Word would be the
handler of choice under Microsoft Windows;
Not necessarily. :-)
no idea what the
On 11/7/12 6:02 AM, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
Philip TAYLOR wrote:
gfagan...@gmail.com wrote:
Even when I chose 'Open' it asks where to save them. OS is Puppyt
Linux.
Do you have a suitable handler installed ? Microsoft Word would be the
handler of choice under Microsoft
gfagan...@gmail.com wrote:
Even when I chose 'Open' it asks where to save them. OS is Puppyt Linux.
My SeaMonkey opens the dialog box and Open with uses LibreOffice
Writer to open a .doc file for me.
Strange because I don't see a Microsoft doc file as a Content Type in
Helper Applications.
101 - 200 of 337 matches
Mail list logo
