robert.ga...@att.net wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Just drops dead on http://cagle.com/news/BLOG trying to look at his
latest cartoon for the French.
Week-old SM 2.0a3 was able to open the same page just fine.
Tested under Fedora FC9 and FC10, using the version from Mozilla
download, not the F
Jens Hatlak wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Please file an Enhancement bug for this, it sounds like a good idea.
I did not know how to do it ...
If someone can guide me
1. Go to https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/
2. click Report a bug
3. select SeaMonkey
4. follow the instructions.
Don't worry if you
Robert's post "SeaMonkey Project Goals - The Summary/Excerpt" and a
recent request for help "BookMarks,hope this group is better
than others" on the FF NG triggered some thoughts I wish to share:
- Den's post of the FF NG requested such a simple information - which
had not been answere
John Doue wrote:
Robert's post "SeaMonkey Project Goals - The Summary/Excerpt" and a
recent request for help "BookMarks,hope this group is better
than others" on the FF NG triggered some thoughts I wish to share:
- Den's post of the FF NG requested such a simple information - which
ha
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
John Doue wrote:
Robert's post "SeaMonkey Project Goals - The Summary/Excerpt" and a
recent request for help "BookMarks,hope this group is better
than others" on the FF NG triggered some thoughts I wish to share:
- Den's post of the FF NG requeste
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 20:14:08 +0200
John Doue wrote:
> - Den's post of the FF NG requested such a simple information - which
> had not been answered by respectable members of that NG - that I
> hesitated answering it, for fearing of missing the obvious and making
> a fool of myself. I finally di
John Doue wrote:
robert.ga...@att.net wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Just drops dead on http://cagle.com/news/BLOG trying to look at his
latest cartoon for the French.
Week-old SM 2.0a3 was able to open the same page just fine.
Tested under Fedora FC9 and FC10, using the version from Mozilla
d
On 12/20/2008 09:19 PM, Philip Chee wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 18:52:33 -0800, NoOp wrote:
>
>> fine), Xsidebar honked on my today & required a reload/install, Mozilla
>> Prefbar is still learning to clear data... etc.
>
> If you are on the 2.0a3pre trunk nightlies, every few weeks some change
Daniel wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 12/20/2008 05:39 PM, Daniel wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 12/20/2008 05:51 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
Why not install Prefbar& then you can easily turn it off& on
easily:
http://prefbar.mozdev.org/
quote "you can
Bill Davidsen wrote:
That is, the fonts used to present menus, etc. The Fedora Linux releases
of seamonkey have those fonts set to something very small (perhaps
4-6pt) and I can't seem to change them.
Tried:
- font settings in about:config
- using other themes
The first changes font sizes in
I'm trying to play some streaming video ("Doppler radar" at
http://www.wfsb.com/video/9688512/index.html/index.html) via SM 1.1.14
on my Kutuntu 8.10 system.
I have .wmv files associated with Kaffeine via my SM preferences, and
they open right up in my browser.
When I try to play the weather
Rob Lindauer wrote:
I'm trying to play some streaming video ("Doppler radar" at
http://www.wfsb.com/video/9688512/index.html/index.html) via SM 1.1.14
on my Kutuntu 8.10 system.
I have .wmv files associated with Kaffeine via my SM preferences, and
they open right up in my browser.
When I tr
On 12/21/2008 11:42 AM, robert.ga...@att.net wrote:
>
> For what it's worth, today the entire cartoon including feet was
> displayed without any changes to Seamonkey or my system. At the same
> time, the image was cut off losing the lower half of the shoes with
> Internet Explorer.
>
> If the
On 12/21/2008 12:00 PM, Moz Champion (Dan) wrote:
> Daniel wrote:
>> NoOp wrote:
>>> On 12/20/2008 05:39 PM, Daniel wrote:
NoOp wrote:
> On 12/20/2008 05:51 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
>> Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
>>> Ray_Net wrote:
> Why not install Prefbar& th
On 12/21/2008 2:26 PM, NoOp wrote:
> On 12/21/2008 12:00 PM, Moz Champion (Dan) wrote:
>> Daniel wrote:
>>> NoOp wrote:
On 12/20/2008 05:39 PM, Daniel wrote:
> NoOp wrote:
>> On 12/20/2008 05:51 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
>>> Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
>>
Among ZDNet's blogs for 12/15/08 was this posting: "Major Web browsers fail
password protection tests" (http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=2305). The test
in question was performed by Chapin Information Services, and the full details
can be found here: http://www.info-svc.com/news/2008/12-12/
On 12/20/2008 01:04 PM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> 7 weeks ago, I started a thread on long-term SeaMonkey project goals on
> the mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey newsgroup, trying to gather opinions from
> the community on a vision for future of the project surrounding the
> long-standing Int
John Doue wrote:
Question 1 - How do we make SM a realistic choice for basic computer
users, meaning those who tend to be satisfied with what they get when
they buy a machine. Vista and all its BS, unavoidable Explorer.
Sorry to be blunt, but I don't see those as our target group, I see
those
NoOp wrote:
I primarily killed/ignored that thread on dev becuase: 1) it was on dev
rather than on mozilla.support.seamonkey where the 'users' actually are,
I agree with that. The vast majority of opinions that
were posted within that thread mostly came from
developers. The users opinion wa
Tony wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
That is, the fonts used to present menus, etc. The Fedora Linux
releases of seamonkey have those fonts set to something very small
(perhaps 4-6pt) and I can't seem to change them.
Tried:
- font settings in about:config
- using other themes
The first changes fon
Robert Kaiser wrote:
John Doue wrote:
Question 1 - How do we make SM a realistic choice for basic computer
users, meaning those who tend to be satisfied with what they get when
they buy a machine. Vista and all its BS, unavoidable Explorer.
Sorry to be blunt, but I don't see those as our targe
Rob Lindauer wrote:
I'm trying to play some streaming video ("Doppler radar" at
http://www.wfsb.com/video/9688512/index.html/index.html) via SM 1.1.14
on my Kutuntu 8.10 system.
I have .wmv files associated with Kaffeine via my SM preferences, and
they open right up in my browser.
When I tr
D. K. Kraft wrote:
Among ZDNet's blogs for 12/15/08 was this posting: "Major Web
browsers fail
password protection tests" (http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=2305).
The test
in question was performed by Chapin Information Services, and the full
details
can be found here: http://www.info-svc
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 17:15:03 -0800
Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo
wrote:
> NoOp wrote:
>
> > I primarily killed/ignored that thread on dev becuase: 1) it was on
> > dev rather than on mozilla.support.seamonkey where the 'users'
> > actually are,
>
> I agree with that. The vast majority of op
With patience akin to a cat's, Barry Edwin Gilmour, on 12/21/2008 6:52 PM typed:
D. K. Kraft wrote:
Among ZDNet's blogs for 12/15/08 was this posting: "Major Web browsers fail
password protection tests" (http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=2305). The test
in question was performed by Chapin Inf
Daniel wrote:
Tony wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
That is, the fonts used to present menus, etc. The Fedora Linux
releases of seamonkey have those fonts set to something very small
(perhaps 4-6pt) and I can't seem to change them.
Tried:
- font settings in about:config
- using other themes
The fi
On 12/18/2008 3:48 PM, Ed Mullen wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 12/18/2008 12:24 AM, Ed Mullen wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 12/17/2008 1:31 AM, Ed Mullen wrote:
When I installed SM 2 it imported my 1.1.13 profile. Seems to be
working fine.
Until a friend noted that every emai
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 12/18/2008 3:48 PM, Ed Mullen wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 12/18/2008 12:24 AM, Ed Mullen wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 12/17/2008 1:31 AM, Ed Mullen wrote:
When I installed SM 2 it imported my 1.1.13 profile. Seems to be
working fine.
Until a
Robert Kaiser wrote:
John Doue wrote:
Question 1 - How do we make SM a realistic choice for basic computer
users, meaning those who tend to be satisfied with what they get when
they buy a machine. Vista and all its BS, unavoidable Explorer.
Sorry to be blunt, but I don't see those as our targe
Daniel wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
John Doue wrote:
Question 1 - How do we make SM a realistic choice for basic computer
users, meaning those who tend to be satisfied with what they get when
they buy a machine. Vista and all its BS, unavoidable Explorer.
Sorry to be blunt, but I don't see tho
30 matches
Mail list logo
