Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com writes:
I would guess that the 'warranty' comment is just the typical corporate
reaction to questions of liability, perhaps combined with a lack of
understanding of open data.
Especially when you consider that when you turn on your device you get a
warning saying
Fabian Schmidt fschm...@informatik.uni-leipzig.de schrieb:
Hallo,
Am 27.06.11 schrieb Wolfgang Barth:
Was ich mich schon immer gefragt habe war, warum es kein GPS-Gerät
mit
e-paper Anzeige gibt. Auch diese transflexiven Displays sind bei
Sonnenlicht nur schlecht ablesbar. Für
Fabian Schmidt fschm...@informatik.uni-leipzig.de schrieb:
Am 27.06.11 schrieb Matthias Julius:
Also ich habe mit meinem Garmin GPSmap 60 keine Probleme bei
Sonnenschein. Das funktioniert so gut, dass ich mich immer frage,
warum
niemand solche Displays in Handies einbaut.
- kein
malenki o...@malenki.ch writes:
Stephan Knauss schrieb:
Da die Bilder allerdings aus vielen Einzelbildern zusammengesetzt
werden kann sich der Versatz nach ein paar Kilometern geändert haben.
Soweit ich weiß, werden alle Bilder mit einem Höhendatenmodell
nachberechnet, um Verzerrungen zu
Michael Collinson m...@ayeltd.biz schrieb:
The link looks good. I'll make sure any future license change related
stuff goes here as well as our normal announce mailings.
For me the preferred and most natural way of receiving announcements is the
announce mailing list. Announcements on talk
NopMap ekkeh...@gmx.de schrieb:
Hi!
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Well there was an announcement on 14th June on this list and others
by
Mike Collinson saying that we intend to move to phase 4 this Sunday
19th June or as soon after as is technically practical.
For anyone who had already
David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au writes:
On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 09:16 -0500, Toby Murray wrote:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:19 PM, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
when all the nearmap-derived data is removed
It seems like you missed an email a couple of days ago?
Current
Steve Coast st...@asklater.com schrieb:
I'm speaking personally and there are no guarantees here but I'd like
to
get input on what areas you would like Bing to prioritise for aerial
and/or satellite imagery in the coming year.
Large areas of Switzerland have pretty low resolution. A couple
Dermot McNally derm...@gmail.com writes:
On 16 June 2011 18:55, Robert Kaiser ka...@kairo.at wrote:
I know at least one person who does exactly that just because he wants to
harm the OSMF because he disagrees with the processes - not with the
outcome, though.
The harm he's doing is to the
Johannes Huesing johan...@huesing.name writes:
Manuel Reimer manuel.s...@nurfuerspam.de [Mon, May 30, 2011 at 08:12:52PM
CEST]:
André Joost wrote:
Ein Tourismusverband, der unbedingt *seine* Rechte *nicht* weitergeben
will, kann uns daher u.U. einen Strick draus drehen, wenn wir einfach
Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com writes:
P.S: Neulich bei Amazon gesehen: MARCO POLO Karten 1:150.000 Kreta:
Mit landwirtschaftlich schönen Strecken ... :-)
Rapsfelder z.B. sind doch recht nett anzusehen.
Matthias
___
Talk-de mailing list
Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org schrieb:
Hi,
On 05/19/2011 06:44 AM, Hermann Peifer wrote:
Are the boundary polygons that you use for clipping available
somewhere?
I do vaguely remember that I have seen them earlier, but I can't find
them anymore.
No, they aren't publicly available but I
Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org schrieb:
Hi,
Matthias Julius wrote:
One option would be to run osmosis with clipIncompleteEntities=false
(the default). That would not increase the burden on your box and
still
allow the extracts to be merged. Of course, this would leave it up
Joerg Fischer o...@jfis.de schrieb:
NopMap wrote:
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=11792--
Dnke. Der Tipp zu osmchange war genau das was ich brauchte. Für den
geneigten Mitleser: Entgegen seinem Namen ist osmchange nicht nur für
das
Nachziehen von täglichen Differenzen, es
Kai Krueger kakrue...@gmail.com schrieb:
Altogether, I think those daily country extracts are one of the most
useful
tools for working with OSM data, so I'd like to send a great thanks
to
Geofabrik for providing the resource to offer this valuable service.
I agree.
But, I need to point out
Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org writes:
Matthias,
Matthias Julius wrote:
But, I need to point out again that theese extracts are not quite as
useful as they could be, IMHO. Unless something has been changed,
ways that cross the bounding polygon are trunkated at the last node
inside
Simon Poole si...@poole.ch writes:
Was soll das Problem sein (hat Fredierik aber auch schon in Detail
aufgezeigt)?
a) aus Eigeninteresse wird wohl was zurückfliessen, denn was nützen
Karten die nicht aktuell gehalten werden.
Was soll zurückfliessen? Das Aktuellhalten erledigt ja OSM.
b)
Simon Poole si...@poole.ch writes:
Die Quelle für Leute die richtiges Englisch sprechen (hab hier grad
leider nur ne kleine Version davon) sagt unter Anderem dazu:
path 1 a way or track laid down for walking or made by continual
treading, 2 the line along which a person or thing moves
Fabian Schmidt fschm...@informatik.uni-leipzig.de writes:
Am 29.04.11 schrieb M∡rtin Koppenhoefer:
geht es um Höflichkeit, wenn man sein Mapping den lokalen
Gepflogenheiten anpassen soll?
Ich empfinde es als höflich, ein einheitliches Kartenbild zu wahren,
auch wenn es zu unterschiedlichem
Sebastian Hohmann m...@s-hohmann.de schrieb:
Am 27.04.2011 10:45, schrieb Sven Geggus:
Sebastian Hohmannm...@s-hohmann.de wrote:
Das Argument hab ich nie verstanden. Was definierst du denn als
Missbrauch? Und seit wann sind Firmen verpflichtet etwas
zurückzugeben?
Share Alike Lizenzen
Bernd Wurst be...@bwurst.org schrieb:
Am 2011-04-26 13:30 schrieb Henning Scholland:
Diesem Weg darf jeder benutzen.
Das ist ja das geniale:
highway=path alleine darf jeder nutzen, highway=path in Kombination
mit somespecialfoobar=designated darf eben nur noch
somespecialfoobar benutzen.
Das
bundesrainer o...@bundesrainer.de writes:
Am 13.04.2011 15:37, schrieb Tobias Knerr:
Am 13.04.2011 15:13, schrieb Alexander Matheisen:
Macht sie irgendwie unglaubwürdig...
Dass sie unabhängig von OSM sogar ihre eigenen Inhalte unter CC-BY-SA
stellen, würde ich positiv hervorheben. Dass sie
Jan Tappenbeck o...@tappenbeck.net writes:
Am 11.04.2011 21:09, schrieb Carsten Gerlach:
Am Montag 11 April 2011 schrieb Jan Tappenbeck:
Am 10.04.2011 19:34, schrieb Florian Gross:
Note that bbox queries have a maximum of 10 square degrees.
Jan Tappenbeck o...@tappenbeck.net writes:
hi !
es gibt ja zwischenzeitlich jxapi und auch von mapquest eine
entprechende alternativen.
Bei beiden habe ich aber festgestellt das
http://open.mapquestapi.com/xapi/api/0.6/way[shop=farm][bbox=4.6582031,45.0890356,16.875,55.5783447]
David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au writes:
Based on andrzej's email correspondence, where it was pointed out that
the relevant point in ToS is in regards to 'mass downloads or bulk feeds
of any content', I assume this means that we cant automate the process
from googles resources (such as the
fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com writes:
Am 02.04.2011 15:39, schrieb Jens Frank:
Zur Standortbewertung müsste man sich natürlich noch anschauen, ob man
nicht evtl in der Nähe ausländischer AKWs wäre. Frankreich stellt seine AKWs
z.B. gerne in Grenznähe auf.
Die Schweiz ist da auch nicht
Phil! Gold phi...@pobox.com writes:
* Rodolphe Quiedeville rodol...@quiedeville.org [2011-03-11 13:39 +0100]:
I want to know if changes files from
planet.openstreetmap.org/hourly-replicate/ are useful for a BBOX. My
first idea wass to to this with osmosis, if someone give me a hint.
You
Jo winfi...@gmail.com writes:
About that tag, it makes sense if there actually is a bicycle path, but when
it's a street where only bicycles can go in two directions, wouldn't it make
more sense to use one_way:bicycle=no?
Well, you can propose to change the tagging scheme, but the
On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 21:45:14 +1100, Andrew Harvey
andrew.harv...@gmail.com
wrote:
I've decided to just ignore the CTs for now, and continue to operate
under CC BY-SA. Others are doing this to, and you could too, assuming
you haven't agreed to the CTs and you don't actually plan to sit
around
On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 11:44:57 +0100, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Am 2. Dezember 2010 20:18 schrieb Stephan Knauss
o...@stephans-server.de:
Man müsste auf Serverseite irgendwie die Möglichkeit haben dem
Plugin zu sagen hör mal meine Daten sind gut, schalte verschieben
bitte
On Mon, 6 Dec 2010 08:26:46 -0800 (PST), Walter Nordmann
walter.nordm...@web.de wrote:
hi thomas,
immer noch serbien?
ok, spltte die tausende neuen ways in kleinere pakete auf und packe
jeweils
die passenden neuen nodes dazu.
alles ids negativ aber im osm-file eindeutig. jedes file darf
Walter Nordmann walter.nordm...@web.de writes:
Matthias Julius wrote:
Ansonsten hat JOSM eine Funktion, die Daten häppchenweise hochzuladen. Im
englischen JOSM heisst die Chunked Upload. Da kann man dann festlegen,
wieviele Objekte per Upload JOSM hochladen soll.
das ist dann doch immer
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 15:47:52 +0100, UMAX974 umax...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hallo,
Hab gerade nach der Anleitung mein gut funktionierendes WMS (auch mit
Bing) und slippymap ausgenockt und imaginary als einziges Plugin
aktiviert.
^
so nu is Bing
adca03156...@localhost
fca549be3ecf9d4cb8cb8576837ea4890a7...@zeus.cetest.local
Message-ID: 90c6e47a092dece1a7770a5cb6164...@localhost
X-Sender: li...@julius-net.net
User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.3.1
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 17:39:46 +0100, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert
Gremmen
On Fri, 26 Nov 2010 16:47:14 +0100, Robert Kaiser ka...@kairo.at wrote:
Olaf Schmidt-Wischhöfer schrieb:
There seems to be a substantial number of OSMF members who consider all
data
created by individuals to be community-owned, even going so far as to
accuse
people who refuse to accept the
On Fri, 26 Nov 2010 08:24:46 +0100, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org
wrote:
Die Geofabrik-Extrakte verhalten sich also ab jetzt so:
1. alle Nodes im betreffenden Gebiet sind enthalten
2. alle Ways, die einen dieser Nodes nutzen, sind enthalten, allerdings
werden sie um die Nodes gekuerzt,
On Fri, 26 Nov 2010 01:32:45 -0800 (PST), NopMap ekkeh...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi!
Matthias Julius wrote:
Zu 2. und 3.: Ich fände es deutlich besser, wenn Objekte in den
Extrakten
nicht modifiziert würden. Dann wären grenzüberschreitende Objekte eben
unvollständig. Eine verarbeitende
On Fri, 26 Nov 2010 12:32:00 +0100, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org
wrote:
Hallo,
On 11/26/10 11:54, Matthias Julius wrote:
Was passiert eigentlich mit Wegen, die die Grenze mehrfach kreuzen?
Kriegt
dann jedes Fragment eine eigene ID? Man kann ja nicht einfach nur die
Knoten weglassen
On Fri, 26 Nov 2010 12:57:33 +0100, André Joost
andre+jo...@nurfuerspam.de wrote:
Am 26.11.10 12:42, schrieb Matthias Julius:
Das ist ja dann noch ein Grund, die Wege nicht zu verstümmeln.
Wenn von einem Weg ein Knoten nicht im Extrakt enthalten ist, kann die
Applikation entscheiden, wie
On Fri, 26 Nov 2010 14:32:51 +0100, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org
wrote:
Hallo Matthias,
On 11/26/10 12:42, Matthias Julius wrote:
Das ist ja dann noch ein Grund, die Wege nicht zu verstümmeln.
Wenn von einem Weg ein Knoten nicht im Extrakt enthalten ist, kann die
Applikation
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 13:56:54 +, Rob Myers r...@robmyers.org wrote:
On 11/25/2010 01:33 PM, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
wrote:
That is turning reality upside down.
The only reason
for any license is to restrict any user of data/map/dbase or
whatever the license is
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 18:42:51 +0100, Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org wrote:
Außerdem wurde die Suche komplett überarbeitet. Es wird jetzt in Keys
und
in
Values gesucht. Dabei wird eine Prefix-Suche verwendet, d.h. max
findet
maxspeed, aber nicht betamax. Bestandteile eines Keys oder Values,
die
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:38:24 +0100 (CET), Fabian Schmidt
fschm...@informatik.uni-leipzig.de wrote:
Am 23.11.10 schrieb Jochen Topf:
Die ID wird niemals neu vergeben. Auch deswegen, weil gelöschte Objekte
ja
noch da sind. Sie werden nur als gelöscht gekennzeichnet, aber sie sind
mit
allen
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com writes:
2010/11/17 Matthias Julius li...@julius-net.net:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 18:20:39 +0100, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Btw: isn't a rendering a derived database as well?
A database of pixels? I would not regard a printed
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 09:13:04 +0100, Wolfgang wolfg...@ivkasogis.de
wrote:
ich oute mich hier mal: Für mein Suse gibt es das schon lange. Die
OSM-Pakete
werden von den Entwicklern in ein eigenes Repository geschoben, das über
pin
gefunden und in die normale Softwareverwaltung eingebunden
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 17:08:03 +0100, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Am 17. November 2010 16:22 schrieb Jan Tappenbeck o...@tappenbeck.net:
Hi !
das geht aber immer mehr in Richtung PARK !
Gruß Jan :-)
ich würde wohl landuse=residential lassen (wenn die Rasenflächen
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 08:53:41 +0100, Andreas Labres l...@lab.at wrote:
On 16.11.10 08:14, Guenther Meyer wrote:
type = sewer
Ich bin jetzt im Englischen auch nicht sooo fit, aber für mein Gefühl
ist
sewer
eher das einzelne Abflussrohr, der Abwasserkanal, während das Abwasser
(als
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 09:20:50 +0100, Ulf Lamping
ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 16.11.2010 09:06, schrieb Matthias Julius:
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 08:53:41 +0100, Andreas Labresl...@lab.at wrote:
On 16.11.10 08:14, Guenther Meyer wrote:
type = sewer
Ich bin jetzt im Englischen auch nicht
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 16:49:36 +0100, Torsten Leistikow de_m...@gmx.de
wrote:
Die Frage hier ist doch mal wieder, aus welchem Blickwinkel man ein
Objekt
betrachtet:
A) Es handelt sich hierbei grob gesagt um ein Objekt der
Abwasserentsorgung. Und
wenn man das genauer betrachtet, sieht man,
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 10:55:57 +0100, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Am 15. November 2010 10:22 schrieb Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org:
Ich habe versucht mit der Karte, wo die Keys sind, so ein bischen die
Geographie mit zu berücksichtigen. Ich will das auch noch weiter
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 13:48:51 +0100, Jan Tappenbeck o...@tappenbeck.net
wrote:
Im Web habe ich unter [1] eine Anleitung gefunden, das josm-tested.jar
heruntergeladen und
sudo mv ./Desktop/josm-tested.jar /usr/share/java/
ausgeführt.
Das Jar war danach auch vom Desktop verschwunden -
Guido Scholz guido.sch...@bayernline.de writes:
Die eigentliche josm-Version versteckt sich hier:
/usr/share/josm/josm-0.0.svn3514.jar
Man erkennt auch gleich welche svn-Version vorliegt.
Genug der vielen Worte. Meine Variante besteht nun darin, diese alte
Version durch eine neue zu
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 11:37:26 +0100, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Am 12. November 2010 11:16 schrieb Chris66 chris66...@gmx.de:
Am 12.11.2010 10:58, schrieb Frank Martin:
Ich meine für Güter, nicht für Menschen.
für Güter wäre der korrekte englische Begriff
On Tue, 2 Nov 2010 01:02:37 +0800, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 12:25 AM, Peter Budny pet...@gatech.edu wrote:
As far as I'm concerned, the difference in what's required to tag
things
is minimal between these concerns. Therefore, wouldn't it make the
most
Iván Sánchez Ortega i...@sanchezortega.es writes:
On Friday 14 May 2010 15:03:25 Nakor wrote:
I take you to the word. Can you please help me finding out what in the
software I use (JOSM) and/or my workflow is seriously wrong?
Not running the Validator plugin frequently enough. It detects,
Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com writes:
It's not so simple. This changeset:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/4300452 made me a
villain when I selectively undid a so-called hero's indiscriminate
joining of highways to boundaries, power lines, and pipelines:
andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com writes:
On 9 April 2010 15:30, Matthias Julius li...@julius-net.net wrote:
Val Kartchner val...@gmail.com writes:
3) Prefix, body, suffix is available from the TIGER data, but what about
streets that have already been added (or corrected) by users
Val Kartchner val...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 12:23 -0400, Richard Welty wrote:
i don't think anyone would argue with this. it's why having a bot
rampage through
fixing things is probably a Real Bad Idea unless it's extremely well
thought out
and comprehensively tested
Val Kartchner val...@gmail.com writes:
3) Prefix, body, suffix is available from the TIGER data, but what about
streets that have already been added (or corrected) by users? As we've
seen, a bot won't always be able to correctly make these separations (as
in the example of Southbay vs. South
andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com writes:
On 9 April 2010 15:06, Matthias Julius li...@julius-net.net wrote:
Val Kartchner val...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 12:23 -0400, Richard Welty wrote:
i don't think anyone would argue with this. it's why having a bot
rampage through
andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com writes:
Hi,
On 7 April 2010 07:36, Val Kartchner val...@gmail.com wrote:
The Editing Standards and
Conventions
(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions;)
page says: In the name tag, enter the full name as it appears on the
Tirkon tirko...@yahoo.de writes:
Not supporting relations is impossible anyway; the API will not allow
the deletion of a node that is part of a relation.
Will this apply to the node3 in the example above as well, because the
node itself is not member of the relation. It is only part of a way,
Valent Turkovic valent.turko...@gmail.com writes:
Hi,
I recently discovered destopwms [1] and it is a great utility that
enables OSM, Yahoo and Google maps as WMS layers in JOSM.
OSM layer is great because it is easier to map when can see the map at
the same time.
Do you know the slippymap
Jeff Barlow j...@wb6csv.net writes:
Shows how? This is not obvious to me. Are there examples
somewhere? If they are not connected then are we supposed to move
them around till they are? If so how does one guess where they
are supposed to go?
There is a sort button in the relation editor (the
Jeffrey Ollie j...@ocjtech.us writes:
What's more annoying is that he is changing the names/refs. From
what I understand the ref is supposed to be only the
interstate/highway number (e.g. 90 or 80) and not I 90 (MN).
And I don't like this at all. First, this seems to be different than
how
Mike N. nice...@att.net writes:
Second, separating out the highway system requires the data consuming
application to know how to piece things back together. Otherwise, a
shield on a map for example with just a 25 in it is pretty limited in
use.
After / if a generalized shield solution is
Jeffrey Ollie j...@ocjtech.us writes:
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Matthias Julius li...@julius-net.net wrote:
Jeffrey Ollie j...@ocjtech.us writes:
What's more annoying is that he is changing the names/refs. From
what I understand the ref is supposed to be only the
interstate/highway
Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com writes:
Stellan Lagerstrom lagerst...@blindsight.com writes:
We have a user (mk408) who seems intent on turning 3/4 of all
residential streets in the bay area into tertiary.
This seems excessive to me. Most of these are just residential streets,
not
Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net writes:
On 12/3/09 11:27 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
On 12/3/09 11:00 PM, David Fawcett wrote:
I agree that it would be good to have a standard answer. I am
thinking that the tag should be used for both symbology and
connectivity.
i'm going
David ``Smith'' vidthe...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 2:18 AM, Dale Puch dale.p...@gmail.com wrote:
It sounds like t...@home needs to trim data at the tile border, and then
close open ways along the border of the tile...
Just my uneducated opinion.
Let's say you have a tile
Dale Puch dale.p...@gmail.com writes:
Oops I spoke too soon. There is a relation.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/304245
I still think this is the probable source of the problem though. Perhaps
someone with more experience with relations could take a look?
I don't know all the
David Lynch djly...@gmail.com writes:
Agreed. I can understand not wanting to abbreviate words that don't
have a standard abbreviation, but the USPS is the de-facto arbiter of
how addresses (and therefore street names) are written in the United
States, and they have a well-defined list of
Greg Williamson gwilliamso...@yahoo.com writes:
Just out of curiosity, how do our European companeros deal with things
like 2-Bis ? Most of the addresses I have seen in the US with
letters tend to be campuses and business parks as opposed to street
addresses.
A legit address in France -- #2
Randy rwtnospam-new...@yahoo.com writes:
Matthias Julius wrote:
Randy rwtnospam-new...@yahoo.com writes:
Dale Puch wrote:
Would it be improper to tag the true Wal-Mart services to the building
way, (either using semicolons or shop_n and amenity_n, and the
partnered services (McDonald's, etc
Randy rwtnospam-new...@yahoo.com writes:
Dale Puch wrote:
For the same reason as doing nodes at a mall or similar. To know the
stores/services available, not just the type of stuff that is usually
there.
If your tagging fast food, why would you not tag the McDonalds in the super
walmart as
Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net writes:
80n wrote:
What percentage of data would other people feel willing to see
sacrificed in order to move forward with the new license?
I'd be interested to see this related to our userbase and editing stats.
If (say) we lose 5%, how many months
Celso González ce...@mitago.net writes:
I dont understand the -1 or reserved value, what that means?
one way yes/true/1 but in the opposite direction of the way?
Exactly.
Matthias
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
Elena of Valhalla elena.valha...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 8:48 PM, Matthias Julius li...@julius-net.net wrote:
You could create an architect relation and have the buildings be
members of that.
that looks like a category, not a relation: I was under the impression
Jonathan Bennett openstreet...@jonno.cix.co.uk writes:
Matthias Julius wrote:
What is the definition of a category here?
I would call a category something like buildings that are 29 strories
tall. An architect I would call an (abstract) object that can have
other attributes as well like
Jonathan Bennett openstreet...@jonno.cix.co.uk writes:
Matthias Julius wrote:
I just prefer to explicitly link objects together over duplication of
data.
As long as the buildings are tagged consistently, having the tag is
probably enough -- you can then use XAPI to query the DB for all
Karl Newman siliconfi...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Theodore Book tb...@libero.it wrote:
I have put the various proposals on the wiki at:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/US_Forest_Service_Data
It seems like the landuse=forest tag has a fair amount of consensus,
Inge Wallin i...@lysator.liu.se writes:
Hi, one of the Marble developers here...
I noticed that Marble shows the map right up to the poles. These are
not covered by Mercator maps. So I suspect Marble stretches the map a
little bit leading to some inaccuracies like water reaching almost
Robert (Jamie) Munro rjmu...@arjam.net writes:
Frankie Roberto wrote:
Looking through Tagwatch I noticed that both artist=* and artist_name=*
have been used (presumably for public sculptures and art installation),
and I did wonder whether architect_name=* would be better. It seems that
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason ava...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 1:14 AM, Kyle Gordon k...@lodge.glasgownet.com
wrote:
I hope I'm not alone in saying Thank You! :-D
OSB is a wonderful resource that many of us couldn't live without. I
know a few people were sceptical due to the
Inge Wallin i...@lysator.liu.se writes:
On Wednesday 18 February 2009 20:43:35 Matthias Julius wrote:
Inge Wallin i...@lysator.liu.se writes:
Hi, one of the Marble developers here...
I noticed that Marble shows the map right up to the poles. These are
not covered by Mercator maps. So I
Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk writes:
Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
So, we have a pile of good intentioned legacy here. OGD carries posts on all
sorts of open geo data stuff in the early days (Aug 2004) including the most
important one http://www.opengeodata.org/?p=2 relating to
Claudius Henrichs claudiu...@gmx.de writes:
Am 11.02.2009 13:18, Gert Gremmen:
Kenneth:
does *any* mapping app have an option like 'add road'?
Do you know any mapping application accessible for everyone
having internet ???
*cough* http://www.google.com/mapmaker *cough*
And the thing is
Someoneelse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk writes:
Maybe something more akin to openstreetbugs plus a simple guided way to
add one feature at a time should be integrated into OSM, but I wouldn't
use GMM as an example except of what not to do!
We certainly should not try to emulate their bugs.
Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org writes:
There being multiple relations for the same walking route is something
that happens every day, not because of the size limit but because
someone working on a local bit of the route might not be aware of
someone else working on another local bit
Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org writes:
Hi,
Matthias Julius wrote:
What I don't like here is that this leads to duplication of data.
Super-relations are fine, but IMHO tags should be moved to the
super-relation.
They should, but I would postpone that until later.
Yes. I just like
Milenko mile...@king-nerd.com writes:
As far as I know, the ROMA servers return data as close as possible to
the main API. They should be no more than 3-5 minutes behind the main
API. Please correct me if I'm wrong (and I very well could be!).
But they still don't implement the whole API.
Dave Stubbs osm.l...@randomjunk.co.uk writes:
2009/2/2 Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net:
Ulf Lamping wrote:
Yes, if it would use descriptive terms it might solve some
problems. But if you think of a better solution it gets really
difficult to find better terms thats aimed towards
Vikas Yadav vikas.ya...@threebrix.com writes:
Just a casual query about what is the schedule to render TAH tiles below
z12.
I had changed many things in North India maps and those zoom levels still
show tiles.
They get stitched togetcher from z12 tiles after the rendering of a
z12 tiles was
Simon Ward si...@bleah.co.uk writes:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 02:50:37PM -0500, Russ Nelson wrote:
On Jan 27, 2009, at 2:08 PM, Manfred Podzkiewitz wrote:
Hello, i have a question about the handling of unoffical, or ethnic,
or
historic names of towns and villages.
The TIGER import
Shaun McDonald sh...@shaunmcdonald.me.uk writes:
On 27 Jan 2009, at 20:46, Erik Lundin wrote:
Hi,
I had a similar problem earlier this month. The correspondence can be
found in the mail archives:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2009-January/thread.html#33157
The problem is
Simon Ward si...@bleah.co.uk writes:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 04:36:08PM -0500, Matthias Julius wrote:
That's actually error prone if someone enters a semicolon who doesn't
know about the rule. I think that should better be reversed or '\;'
be used as separator because this is much less
Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com writes:
First of all, you should NEVER remove anything from the database, unless
you have made certain by your own eye that the object in question is an
error and not existing in reality! Even than take care not to remove
anything marked as abandoned
Kenneth Gonsalves law...@au-kbc.org writes:
On Friday 23 Jan 2009 6:00:08 pm Sven Rautenberg wrote:
if the way is layer=0 and the bridge is layer=0 too
(the crossing way under is layer=-1, digged)
then the bridge has no ramps.
Something with negative layer has to be a tunnel. Bridges are
Gerda og Carsten gerdaogcars...@toensberg.dk writes:
I am unable to remove way http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/4596756
from the relation http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/21359
I am thus also unable to delete way 4596756 which is overlapping
another way also beeing part
Marc Schütz schue...@gmx.net writes:
(Forwarding to list)
Am Friday 23 January 2009 17:28:17 schrieben Sie:
As I understood the text of the wiki when I first started, layer 0 is
the general level of the terrain, so levels 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 are above
the ground on successively higher bridges,
1 - 100 of 169 matches
Mail list logo