[OSM-talk] weeklyOSM #406 2018-04-24-2018-04-30

The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 406, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/10300/ Enjoy! weeklyOSM? who?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages

[Talk-in] weeklyOSM #406 2018-04-24-2018-04-30

The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 406, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/10300/ Enjoy! weeklyOSM? who?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages

Re: [OSM-talk] Using Wikipedia to add names in other languages

> Unfortunately, Wikipedia is licensed under CC-BY-SA what is incompatible with ODBL. Finally someone who remembers it IMHO: The quick solution can be to ask the producer the permission to add the data inserted from wikipedia to openstreetmap with a flag. On the same time I ask my self how

Re: [OSM-talk] Using Wikipedia to add names in other languages

5. May 2018 14:55 by dieterdre...@gmail.com : > sent from a phone > >> On 5. May 2018, at 14:28, Mateusz Konieczny <>> matkoni...@tutanota.com >> >> > wrote: >> >> (and no, Wikidata is not better - it includes data from Wikipedia

Re: [OSM-talk] Using Wikipedia to add names in other languages

Arguing about licenses and their compatibility does not really help in this context since having formally compatible license (or the related argument that Wikidata is CC0 and therefore by definition the license is a non-issue) would not help. We have just seen in

Re: [OSM-talk] Using Wikipedia to add names in other languages

sent from a phone > On 5. May 2018, at 14:28, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > > (and no, Wikidata is not better - it includes data from Wikipedia and entire > databases protected by sui generis database right so it is even worse as far > as > copyright goes) I’ve read

Re: [OSM-talk] Using Wikipedia to add names in other languages

sent from a phone > On 5. May 2018, at 15:39, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > > sui generis database right is not existing in USA. It is existing in EU, > including UK. > right. And the thing you have potentially to fear is that the owner of the db sues you. If this

Re: [Talk-at] Lizenzen bei Daten von Gemeinden

Ned scho wieder... deklariere dich mal selber ordentliche, wenn du es schon permanent von anderen forderst, Grüße ans Gemeindeamt St Johann in Tirol ;-)      Gesendet: Samstag, 05. Mai 2018 um 01:17 Uhr Von: "Johann Haag" An: "OpenStreetMap AT"

Re: [Talk-at] Lizenzen bei Daten von Gemeinden

Wie du aus meinen Edit Historie erkennen kannst, gibt es in meiner überregionalen Arbeit in OpenStreetMap kein zeitliche Überschneidung, daher fällst du hier mit Deiner Behauptung eindeutig aus der Rolle. Zudem versteckst du dich feige hinter einer Pseudonym Mail Adresse peter_m...@gmx.net während

Re: [OSM-talk] OSM and new Wikipedia map features

Mateusz, rendering still happens on the server right before being sent to the client, but it COULD be rendered on the client too, because the vector.pbf tiles could be accessed directly, bypassing the server side rendering. On Sat, May 5, 2018 at 3:01 PM Mateusz Konieczny

Re: [OSM-talk] OSM and new Wikipedia map features

Thanks, I forgot/missed that rendering happens on client computer and vector tiles with all languages are cached. I also now have one more project on my list - look how vector tiles served by Wikipedia servers may be used (usage limits and what kind of data is provided). 4. May 2018 10:14 by

[OSM-talk] Using Wikipedia to add names in other languages

For example: mapper encounters https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/244082386#map=18/36.62214/101.77352 and wants to add missing name:pl (s)he opens linked https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xining

Re: [OSM-talk] Using Wikipedia to add names in other languages

5. May 2018 16:14 by dieterdre...@gmail.com : > On 5. May 2018, at 15:39, Mateusz Konieczny <> matkoni...@tutanota.com > > > wrote: > > >> >> sui generis database right is not existing in USA. It is existing in EU, >> including

Re: [OSM-talk] Using Wikipedia to add names in other languages

5. May 2018 16:14 by dieterdre...@gmail.com : > On 5. May 2018, at 15:39, Mateusz Konieczny <> matkoni...@tutanota.com > > > wrote: > > >> >> How copying location data[1] from Google Maps (or other source) via >> Wikipedia and

[OSM-talk] highway="corridor" tag

Hello, My code is being surprised by a number of corridors that are tagged highway="corridor". The two examples I have in-front of me are both in Dublin, Ireland; at Stephen's Green Mall and St James Hospital. I say surprised because the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features does

Re: [OSM-talk] highway="corridor" tag

Thank Andy & Mateusz, Yes I think you might be right. I was assuming a level of completeness with that wiki page that simply isn't there. Most are vehicle routable (and in English "highway" implies that!), so the assumption is that new (or typo) values probably will be too. I then managed to

Re: [OSM-talk] highway="corridor" tag

sent from a phone > On 5. May 2018, at 21:38, Richard Marsden wrote: > > So back to my original questions: The only way to find a new valid > tag value is to wait for a user to complain about a funky or lack of > calculated route? it is the data consumer to decide which

Re: [OSM-talk] highway="corridor" tag

5. May 2018 21:38 by winw...@gmail.com : > So back to my original questions: The only way to find a new valid > tag value is to wait for a user to complain about a funky or lack of > calculated route? > Yes, but that is extremely unlikely to happen. List of values

[OSM-talk] New data center status for openstreetmap.org?

Hi, I can't seem to find any 2018 minutes online for the Operations Working Group. An RFQ for a new data center was sent out in February 2018. https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2018/02/19/osmf-request-for-proposals-data-centre-2018/ Given that the previous/current data center space is donated, I

Re: [OSM-talk] highway="corridor" tag

5. May 2018 18:07 by winw...@gmail.com : > my code assumes unknown highway tags are > vehicle-routable (and filters out footpaths, stairs, etc). > that is (1) not relevant (2) a really bad assumption - making highway=cyclewa vehicle-routable is a surprising design,

Re: [OSM-talk] highway="corridor" tag

On 05/05/2018 17:07, Richard Marsden wrote: My code is being surprised by a number of corridors that are tagged highway="corridor". The two examples I have in-front of me are both in Dublin, Ireland; at Stephen's Green Mall and St James Hospital. I say surprised because the page

Re: [Talk-in] Extracting rivers as multipolygons

Ramya! Hi, ok. So, do you have ideas around extracting the relations I've sent as an example (https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=16/24.4812/79.8781) - for example, if I wanted to extract all relations that make up the Sutlej river, would I have to manually find each each relation ID and use

hebdoOSM Nº 406 2018-04-24-2018-04-30

Bonjour, Le résumé hebdomadaire n° 406 de l'actualité OpenStreetMap vient de paraître *en français*. Un condensé à retrouver sur : http://www.weeklyosm.eu/fr/archives/10300/ Bonne lecture ! hebdoOSM ? Qui : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages Où :

semanarioOSM Nº 406 2018-04-24-2018-04-30

Hola, el semanario Nº 406, el sumario de todo lo que está ocurriendo en el mundo de openstreetmap está en línea en *español*: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/es/archives/10300/ ¡Disfruta! semanarioOSM? ¿Dónde?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages ¿Quién?:

[talk-ph] weeklyOSM #406 2018-04-24-2018-04-30

The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 406, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/10300/ Enjoy! weeklyOSM? who?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages

[Talk-us] weeklyOSM #406 2018-04-24-2018-04-30

The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 406, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/10300/ Enjoy! weeklyOSM? who?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages

semanarioOSM Nº 406 2018-04-24-2018-04-30

Hola, el semanario Nº 406, el sumario de todo lo que está ocurriendo en el mundo de openstreetmap está en línea en *español*: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/es/archives/10300/ ¡Disfruta! semanarioOSM? ¿Dónde?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages ¿Quién?:

semanarioOSM Nº 406 2018-04-24-2018-04-30

Hola, el semanario Nº 406, el sumario de todo lo que está ocurriendo en el mundo de openstreetmap está en línea en *español*: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/es/archives/10300/ ¡Disfruta! semanarioOSM? ¿Dónde?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages ¿Quién?:

hebdoOSM Nº 406 2018-04-24-2018-04-30

Bonjour, Le résumé hebdomadaire n° 406 de l'actualité OpenStreetMap vient de paraître *en français*. Un condensé à retrouver sur : http://www.weeklyosm.eu/fr/archives/10300/ Bonne lecture ! hebdoOSM ? Qui : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages Où :

[Talk-ca] weeklyOSM #406 2018-04-24-2018-04-30

The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 406, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/10300/ Enjoy! weeklyOSM? who?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages

[OSM-talk-ie] weeklyOSM #406 2018-04-24-2018-04-30

The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 406, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/10300/ Enjoy! weeklyOSM? who?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages

semanarioOSM Nº 406 2018-04-24-2018-04-30

Hola, el semanario Nº 406, el sumario de todo lo que está ocurriendo en el mundo de openstreetmap está en línea en *español*: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/es/archives/10300/ ¡Disfruta! semanarioOSM? ¿Dónde?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages ¿Quién?:

[Talk-GB] weeklyOSM #406 2018-04-24-2018-04-30

The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 406, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/10300/ Enjoy! weeklyOSM? who?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages

[Talk-cz] WeeklyOSM CZ 405

Ahoj, je dostupné vydání 405 týdeníku WeeklyOSM: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/cz/archives/10284 * Ruské vojenské mapy. * Ortofoto na Slovensku. * Velká polská mapa Skotska. * Rusko blokuje nejen Telegram. * Mikrogranty HOT. * Vektorové dlaždice u Klokanů. * OSM API v R. * Přejmenování Svazijska. *

[Talk-africa] weeklyOSM #406 2018-04-24-2018-04-30

The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 406, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/10300/ Enjoy! weeklyOSM? who?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages

hebdoOSM Nº 406 2018-04-24-2018-04-30

Bonjour, Le résumé hebdomadaire n° 406 de l'actualité OpenStreetMap vient de paraître *en français*. Un condensé à retrouver sur : http://www.weeklyosm.eu/fr/archives/10300/ Bonne lecture ! hebdoOSM ? Qui : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages Où :

hebdoOSM Nº 406 2018-04-24-2018-04-30

Bonjour, Le résumé hebdomadaire n° 406 de l'actualité OpenStreetMap vient de paraître *en français*. Un condensé à retrouver sur : http://www.weeklyosm.eu/fr/archives/10300/ Bonne lecture ! hebdoOSM ? Qui : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages Où :

[Talk-GB] Toys R Us

And for the balance: I disagree with Frederik on this one. If we know the map is wrong we should fix it. We should not leave it just because it may encourage others to fix it and then go on to do other local edits. Frederik's view is that a crap map encourages more people to edit. I'm not

Re: [Talk-de] access tag validator?

sent from a phone > On 5. May 2018, at 12:15, Florian Lohoff wrote: > > highway=* access=no >-> IMHO nicht in der StVO zu Beschildern es gibt ja nicht nur die StVO, die gilt nur im öffentlichen Straßenraum und vielleicht noch auf Supermarktparkplätzen und so, aber ein

Re: [Talk-de] access tag validator?

sent from a phone On 5. May 2018, at 15:23, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: >> 2 highway=path access=yes motor_vehicle=no bicycle=designated >> foot=designated >> -> Darf ich hier als hgv/motorcycle durch? Access=yes? > > > nö, mit hgv und motorcycle nicht, (wegen

Re: [Talk-de] access tag validator?

On Sat, May 05, 2018 at 03:36:00PM +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > sent from a phone > > On 5. May 2018, at 15:23, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > >> 2 highway=path access=yes motor_vehicle=no bicycle=designated > >> foot=designated > >> -> Darf ich hier als

Re: [talk-au] Open Mapping team at Microsoft Australian edits

On 05/05/18 04:10, osm.talk...@thorsten.engler.id.au wrote: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58382600 This user, which on his user page says "I am proud to be in Microsoft Open Maps team." Has been making a lot of "Fixed geometry" changesets. ... I made a changeset comment to which I

[Talk-de] access tag validator?

Hi, ich beschäftige mich gerade mal wieder mit access tags auf Highways. Gibt es irgendwo was maschinenlesbares was schon "illegale" tag Kombinationen listed? Oder eine positiv Liste was StVO möglich ist? Sowas zum Beispiel: highway=footway foot=no highway=footway foot=yes

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Re: Version Android minimale pour OSMTracker

Salut François, Ça marche sur mon vieux Samsung GT5830 avec Android 2.3.6. Et sur F-Droid ils mentionnent : This version requires Android 2.2 or newer. https://f-droid.org/en/packages/me.guillaumin.android.osmtracker/ Au plaisir de te croiser à l'occasion. A+ Christian (gnrc69) -

Re: [Talk-GB] Toys R Us

I concur with this. I'd much rather have an up to date map. Part of OSM's USP is its quick turnarounds. I disagree with Frederik's claim that changing one entity would "destroy the valuable information that this general area of the map hasn't been updated". It seems perverse to want to

Re: [Talk-GB] Toys R Us

Hi, On 05/04/2018 09:10 PM, Brian Prangle wrote: > When will it be  appropriate to do a mechanical edit and remove the 47 > instances of this store that can be seen in Overpass? Have they all > closed now?  My local one is now closed and leaving a large gap on its > retail  park

Re: [Talk-GB] Toys R Us

On 5 May 2018 10:02:01 BST, Frederik Ramm wrote: >Hi, > >On 05/04/2018 09:10 PM, Brian Prangle wrote: >> When will it be  appropriate to do a mechanical edit and remove the >47 >> instances of this store that can be seen in Overpass? Have they all >> closed now?  My local one

Re: [Talk-GB] Toys R Us

On 4 May 2018 at 20:10, Brian Prangle wrote: > When will it be appropriate to do a mechanical edit and remove the 47 > instances of this store that can be seen in Overpass? Maybe we should change them all to "Toys Яn't Us"? -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing

Re: [Talk-de] access tag validator?

sent from a phone > On 5. May 2018, at 12:15, Florian Lohoff wrote: > > 15 highway=path motor_vehicle=destination bicycle=designated foot=designated >-> Wie kann auf einen path ein motor_vehicle passen? motorräder und krankenfahrstühle die als Kfz gelten, z.B. Mir war vor

Re: [Talk-de] access tag validator?

> highway=* access=no > -> IMHO nicht in der StVO zu Beschildern Wie wär's mit Zeichen 600? "Die Einrichtungen verbieten das Befahren der so gekennzeichneten Straßenfläche..." Und mit § 25 Abs. 4: "... Absperrschranken (Zeichen 600) verbieten das Betreten der

Re: [Talk-cz] Poštovní schránky - import do telefonu

Dne 3.5.2018 v 15:33 Václav Kubíček napsal(a): > > Ahoj, > > možná jsem to přehlédl, ale kde se dá stáhnout export schránek české > pošty? > >   > > Případě nebylo by možno udělat odkaz na > stránkách http://josm.poloha.net/cz_pbox/ odkazy ke stažení pro > jednotlivá depa? Nejlépe schránky co

Re: [Talk-GB] Toys R Us

On 4 May 2018 21:04:29 BST, Paul Berry wrote: >Perhaps appropriate when the signage is taken down from any of their >former >stores en masse. In the meantime nothing stopping you mechanically >adding >disused :shop

[Talk-it-lazio] Resoconto incontro 30/04 e prossimo appuntamento

Ciao a tutti, scusate la lentezza, ho provveduto a caricare un breve resoconto del nostro incontro di lunedì, come vedete è corto dato che finalmente il tempo era buono e abbiamo passato la serata a mappare i dintorni de La Strada: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Rome/Incontro/30Aprile2018

[Talk-GB] [OT] Maplin (was: Toys R Us)

On 05/05/18 08:52, Philip Barnes wrote: At present Maplin are still open and not sure if they have a closing date. I'm still hoping they are saved as there is no get it now alternative. They deepened the discounts, yet again, on Friday, and are selling off the shop fittings. I don't think

Re: [Talk-GB] Toys R Us

On Sat, 5 May 2018, 12:00 Rob Nickerson, wrote: > And for the balance: I disagree with Frederik on this one. > A crap map could also put people off - "why bother, OSM is so far behind, > I'll contribute to/just use Google maps instead" > > I think i agree with this.

Re: [Talk-de] access tag validator?

Hola, On Sat, May 05, 2018 at 03:08:42PM +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > sent from a phone > > > On 5. May 2018, at 12:15, Florian Lohoff wrote: > > > > highway=* access=no > >-> IMHO nicht in der StVO zu Beschildern > es gibt ja nicht nur die StVO, die gilt nur im

Re: [Talk-GB] Toys R Us

Taking as read the arguments in for and against a mechanical edit for possibly closed shops* it'd be great if shops that we definitely know are now closed could be properly tagged as what they are now, so for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1485964357#map=19/53.98855/-1.09350 can

Re: [Talk-de] access tag validator?

> ich beschäftige mich gerade mal wieder mit access tags auf Highways. ... Abgesehen von den "vielleicht unter besonderen Bedingungen doch"-Anmerkungen: Solch eine Auswertung halte ich durchaus für sinnvoll. Auch wenn seltsame Kombinationen in Einzelfällen möglich bzw. korrekt sind, werden sich

Re: [talk-au] Open Mapping team at Microsoft Australian edits

Hi Guys, Sorry for the communication breakdown here, we're still evolving our processes. This particular person has been out of the office for over a week which is why they haven't responded to the changeset comment. I am the OSM lead at Microsoft, feel free to reach out to me personally with

Re: [Talk-GB] Toys R Us

On 05/05/2018 16:36, Andy Townsend wrote: > Indeed  - and in the case of named stores (open or shut) which act as > landmarks, there are at least some people (including me) actually > consuming that data.  Please don't remove a name until it really has > been removed. +1 -- helps me mapping too,

Re: [Talk-cz] Fwd: Fell3 strikes again

Ahoj, 2018-05-05 19:21 GMT+02:00 majka : > Tak mám odpověď z DWG. Máme v podstatě dvě možnosti, co s ním, níže dávám > doslovný překlad: > > 1. zakázat mu editace v Čechách. Je to považováno za nestandardní, ale > pokud se to bude muset udělat, udělá se to tak. > > nebo

Re: [Talk-de] access tag validator?

On Sat, May 05, 2018 at 05:02:22PM +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > sent from a phone > > On 5. May 2018, at 16:16, Florian Lohoff wrote: > > > > Und auch Private Wege irgendwo halte ich ein access=no für falsch. > > Irgendwer wird das doch nutzen dürfen oder? private? customer? >

Re: [Talk-de] access tag validator?

sent from a phone > On 5. May 2018, at 16:16, Florian Lohoff wrote: > > > Und auch Private Wege irgendwo halte ich ein access=no für falsch. > Irgendwer wird das doch nutzen dürfen oder? private? customer? > destination? mit Strahlenschutzanzug und Sondergenehmigung. Oder

Re: [Talk-de] access tag validator?

sent from a phone > On 5. May 2018, at 16:19, Florian Lohoff wrote: > > Da wäre ich eben nicht so sicher. Haben wir festgeschrieben in welcher > Reihenfolge access tags ausgewertet werden müssen? das Speziellere trumpft das Allgemeinere, das ist aber vielleicht nicht immer

[Talk-us] Maximum number of tasks on US tasker

What is the maximum number of tasks possible on the US tasker, and is it possible to change that? ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

[talk-au] FW: Open Mapping team at Microsoft Australian edits

I only just noticed that these didn’t go to the mailing list. I was wondering why everyone behaved like these posts hadn’t be made… From: Nemanja Bračko Sent: Saturday, 5 May 2018 17:37 To: osm.talk...@thorsten.engler.id.au Subject: Re: [talk-au] Open Mapping team at

Re: [Talk-GB] Toys R Us

On 06/05/18 00:24, Andy Mabbett wrote: On 5 May 2018 at 14:24, Adam Snape wrote: I too disagree with intentionally ignoring outdated information. +1 However, we cannot know from our armchairs whether a store is disused but still signed What if t is? It is no longer

Re: [Talk-GB] Toys R Us

The reason I said "full removal preferred" was because on a shop=* feature, my understanding is that the name tag relates to the shop. So no shop equals no shop to have a name. If an old sign still exists then this should be mapped *as a sign* not as a shop. So perhaps we need to edit these to

Re: [Talk-de] access tag validator?

sent from a phone > On 5. May 2018, at 17:03, Florian Lohoff wrote: > > Dann ist es aber keine öffentliche Straße. Eine Straße auf dem Gelände > eines AKW sollte als service eingetragen sein ;) Und damit erübrigt sich > dass access=no :) es erübrigen sich auch bei

Re: [Talk-GB] Toys R Us

Hi, On 05.05.2018 12:57, Rob Nickerson wrote: > Frederik's view is that a crap map encourages more people to edit. Not quite. My view is that a crap map doesn't become a non-crap map by erasing one obviously false name, and I was thinking more of our relationship with the map user and not so

Re: [Talk-GB] Toys R Us

On 5 May 2018 at 14:24, Adam Snape wrote: > I too disagree with intentionally ignoring outdated information. +1 > However, we cannot know from our armchairs whether a store is disused but > still signed What if t is? It is no longer an outlet for that brand. There are

Re: [Talk-de] access tag validator?

sent from a phone > On 5. May 2018, at 16:16, Florian Lohoff wrote: > > Auch gerne genommen ist alle service/driveways noch mit einem > "access=private" zu beglücken. Halte ich jetzt auch für weit hergeholt. wenn ein Grundstück umfriedet ist, darf man nicht rein, sonst schon

Re: [Talk-ht] Cartopartie Plaine de RUZIZI RDC

Bonsoir Fred! je partage mes sympathies au peuple RDC en ce moment. Je vous joindrai afin d'apporter ma contribution. Cordialement John Carlo Sainvil Contributeur OSM, membre COSMHANNE depuis Chili. Le 5 mai 2018 à 09:26, Fred Moine a écrit : > > Bonjour, > > > > La

Re: [Talk-GB] Toys R Us

On 05/05/18 13:03, Andy Townsend wrote: Taking as read the arguments in for and against a mechanical edit for possibly closed shops* it'd be great if shops that we definitely know are now closed could be properly tagged as what they are now, so for example

Re: [Talk-us] Maximum number of tasks on US tasker

I think it's somewhere between 2000 and 2100. I'm working on eventually handling the entire state of Oklahoma on a TIGER cleanup and enrichment. *Ideally*, I'd like to do the whole state at once (just for variety's sake and for even coverage), but county by county works, too. If there's a limit

Re: [Talk-de] access tag validator?

sent from a phone > On 5. May 2018, at 16:16, Florian Lohoff wrote: > > Wie oft kommt das vor? Wieviele dieser Straßen kennst du? Die auch > langfristig existieren? ich kenne eine Straße und eine Bahnlinie, beides auf dem Land (aber weit voneinander entfernt). Züge fahren da

Re: [Talk-GB] Toys R Us

On 05/05/2018 14:24, Adam Snape wrote: However, we cannot know from our armchairs whether a store is disused but still signed, disused with all signage removed, demolished, or replaced by another business. Because if this we cannot fix the map merely by deleting the relevant shops. That is

Re: [Talk-ht] Cartopartie Plaine de RUZIZI RDC

Salut John, Merci bien pour cela , tout de bon au Chili. Amicalement, A+ FredM Le 5 mai 2018 à 17:20, John-Carlo Sainvil a écrit : > Bonsoir Fred! > je partage mes sympathies au peuple RDC en ce moment. Je vous joindrai > afin d'apporter ma contribution. > >

Re: [Talk-cz] Fwd: Fell3 strikes again

Tak mám odpověď z DWG. Máme v podstatě dvě možnosti, co s ním, níže dávám doslovný překlad: 1. zakázat mu editace v Čechách. Je to považováno za nestandardní, ale pokud se to bude muset udělat, udělá se to tak. nebo 2. fell3 bude muset při každé editaci v Čechách zadat zkontrolovatelný zdroj.

Re: [Talk-cz] Fwd: Fell3 strikes again

Za mě ad 2 stačí, pokud to nebude "viděl jsem to v nějaké mapě, vlevo dole to bylo," ale reálně ověřitelný zdroj. (Pořád to neřeší špatně zarovnané mapy, ale báň na ČR mi připadá moc) Zdar, HPM Dne so 5. 5. 2018 19:22 uživatel majka napsal: > Tak mám odpověď z DWG.

Re: [Talk-us] Maximum number of tasks on US tasker

I don't know. Do you see a limit somewhere? I'm happy to increase it. On Sat, May 5, 2018, 12:35 Paul Johnson wrote: > What is the maximum number of tasks possible on the US tasker, and is it > possible to change that? > ___ >

Re: [Talk-cz] Fwd: Fell3 strikes again

Taky se mi zdá, že by to mohlo problém vyřešit. Sice mám obavu, aby mu zase za čas neotrnulo, ale vyhrotit situaci a řešení můžeme kdykoli. Majka On Sat, 5 May 2018 at 19:47, Jan Martinec wrote: > Za mě ad 2 stačí, pokud to nebude "viděl jsem to v nějaké mapě, vlevo dole >