Richard Fairhurst schrieb:
> Ulf Lamping wrote:
>> I guess you want to missunderstand this tag.
>
> The tag name should be descriptive. If there's widespread misunderstanding,
> then the tag was misnamed. (And besides, the "wheeled" point still doesn't
> a
Dave Stubbs schrieb:
>
>> 2. ... it is easier for new mappers to have one documented tag for one
>> feature, instead of having to choose...
>
>
> Fine, no problem. I said document both, not recommend both.
document both IS recommend both!
ULFL - who thinks that having already hundreds (litera
Dave Stubbs schrieb:
> 2009/2/24 Ulf Lamping :
>> Dave Stubbs schrieb:
>>>> 2. ... it is easier for new mappers to have one documented tag for one
>>>> feature, instead of having to choose...
>>>
>>> Fine, no problem. I said document both, not
Am 29.01.2011 11:05, schrieb Mahsa Ghasemi:
Hi,
Does anyone know if we are able to associate an image with a map feature
(as an example having an image for a hotel)in OSM?
If you want to say: "you can find a real life photo of this node/way/...
object at the following URL":
image=URL
See:
Am 29.01.2011 13:48, schrieb M∡rtin Koppenhoefer:
2011/1/29 Ulf Lamping:
image=URL
I wonder if this is something we would like to have in our db. Imagine
if we become really widely used, the amount of these tags would
probably explode.
And what's the actual problem with that?
BTW: H
Am 29.01.2011 14:34, schrieb Tobias Knerr:
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer:
2011/1/29 Ulf Lamping:
image=URL
I see this as a case for an external database.
So do I. Choosing the "right" image for an object is very much a matter
of personal taste. Furthermore, a lot of controversial policy
Am 29.01.2011 16:26, schrieb M∡rtin Koppenhoefer:
Here I'm with you. If those Images were stored centrally and hosted by
OSM or the wikimedia foundation I see a much better chance of not
having a big image-link-cemetery in the database.
That "cemetery problem" is just caused by the current almo
Am 10.02.2011 15:12, schrieb Grant Slater:
Message from Mikel 2 days ago explaining:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/2011-February/001052.html
I believe the user-revert script used is fairly simple and does not
have direct access to the OSM database. The script does attempt to
Am 18.02.2011 22:47, schrieb David Murn:
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 16:59 +, Grant Slater wrote:
The new java based XAPI is running and responding to test queries, but
be warned it is still under active development. See:
Am I missing something here...?
Yes, you are missing a few things ;-)
Am 19.02.2011 00:02, schrieb David Murn:
This is modern-day thinking. Modern solutions are to simply throw more
money and hardware at a problem, where older techniques called for using
the same hardware but making the code faster. That then means if you
improve the hardware you get a double-inc
Am 20.02.2011 12:24, schrieb Frank Steggink:
Not everyone in the community is following OSM-talk, let alone
commenting on discussions. There is surely a vocal minority against
imports, like there is also a vocal minority against the upcoming
license change. Yet, support for ODbL and the CT by pre
Am 14.03.2011 20:06, schrieb Tom Hughes:
On 14/03/11 18:45, Nakor wrote:
Isn't a "Pas" just a mountain pass:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:mountain_pass (like e.g.
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pas_de_Peyrol )?
"Col" is the usual word for a mountain pass.
Yes, the french are a lot m
Am 20.06.2011 09:09, schrieb NopMap:
I don't know how you feel, but for me it is very hard to remain supportive
of the matter in the face of such consequent incompetence handling it.
I've read the whole thread now and have some lessons learned:
1. You don't have to wear a suit to be incompeten
Am 01.05.2010 09:42, schrieb David Murn:
> My whole reason for dedicating efforts to OSM, rather than other
> projects such as google mapmaker, is due to the forced openness which
> every user/member has to comply with. If I wanted to be part of a
> pseudo-free map project, Id go back to google, b
Am 03.05.2010 21:12, schrieb Felix Hartmann:
> My actual position on this is, I will write a wiki page, with a note to
> say bug off people against unofficial routes (because for mountainbiking
> they will in a matter of days be largely more than signposted routes),
> we will tag them route:unoffic
Am 04.05.2010 03:15, schrieb Felix Hartmann:
> Arguing about how long someone is inside OSM, is an argument I cannot
> follow. Of course I have only been a member of OSM since 3 years, of
> wich the last 2 years I was more active than the first one. However
> putting prior achievement as a require
Am 30.05.2010 19:09, schrieb Mikel Maron:
>
> > Right now, the only mention of the "on the ground" rule on the wiki is
>> here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disputes#On_the_Ground_Rule
> > Should a separate page be created about how it applies more generally?
>
> The intention of us devisi
Am 18.06.2010 03:55, schrieb Ian Dees:
> I mean we could point people to openstreetbugs, but it's already full up
> because people are more interested in mapping the areas they are
> interested in, not necessarily fixing bugs in other areas.
... or not necessarily interested in fixing bugs in thei
Am 02.07.2010 15:03, schrieb Nic Roets:
I made a demonstration of how the yournavigation.org website can be
embedded inside osm.org. Check it out:
http://nroets.dev.openstreetmap.org/demo/?lat=52.32796&lon=5.62046&zoom=15&layers=B000FTFT
Nice work!
As a motorcycle rider, I was a bit surprised
Am 14.07.2010 01:26, schrieb John Smith:
There has been a slightly disturbing thread on the legal-talk list
about defining critical mass, so far things aren't any closer to being
defined and statistics are being abused to suit positions:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2010-J
Am 14.07.2010 12:03, schrieb Andreas Labres:
On 14.07.10 09:59, Ulf Lamping wrote:
I had hoped that after the dust settled a bit the OSMF learned from these
discussions, but reading the above legal talk thread I still see the same
elitist behaviour from the "inner circle" as before
Am 14.07.2010 11:08, schrieb Andy Allan:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 8:59 AM, Ulf Lamping wrote:
See what our (IMHO not so) respectful OSMF chairman and project founder
Steve C had to say about license (working group) critics in December 2009:
http://fakestevec.blogspot.com/2009/12/fable.html
Am 20.07.2010 03:10, schrieb Elizabeth Dodd:
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, you wrote:
Tell me Liz, have you contributed anything positive to this entire process,
ever, in any way?
I have, whether or not you see it as positive.
I have pointed out that there are problems, and asked people to reconsider
Hi!
Our current "default maps" will display mountain_pass=yes only at very
high zoomlevels (z17), although these are often "important geographic
features". Especially road maps will usually display passes even more
prominently than surrounding peaks.
Nowadays people seem to "fine tune" their
Am 28.07.2010 17:24, schrieb Steve Bennett:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Niccolo Rigacci wrote:
For bikers - at least in Italy Alps and Appennini mountains - a
mountain pass along a road is often used as a meeting point or as
a trip destination. So the use of place=locality is not so
mislea
Am 30.07.2010 13:18, schrieb Frederik Ramm:
To them, I say: Yes, you're right, it can be a pain sometimes, but if
you practice it for a while, it will be an easy routine.
I'm doing this day by day while doing software development - but there
it has a much higher value: Very often you can't get
Am 31.07.2010 11:19, schrieb Peteris Krisjanis:
If that can be solved introducing meaningful new name spaces like
emergency, which could give easy way to filter emergency items, why
not? What is cost of this?
1) Changing it in wiki - one day tops
2) Changing it in db - mass convertation, doable
Am 31.07.2010 11:24, schrieb David Earl:
On 31/07/2010 10:05, Ulf Lamping wrote:
There are people who actively watch out "their area" what changes there.
That's fine and valueable. But IMHO it's *their job* to make sense of
the changes, not the mappers job.
What a se
Am 31.07.2010 12:17, schrieb David Earl:
On 31/07/2010 10:50, John Smith wrote:
Frankly I'd rather spend my time mapping than telling everyone to the
nth degree what my life story about why I made a change.
sad, sad, sad to be so selfish towards your colleagues.
Calling someone selfish when
Am 31.07.2010 14:00, schrieb Peteris Krisjanis:
2010/7/31 Ulf Lamping:
4) Change it in every map renderer / router / other software that is out
there - hundreds (or already even thousands?) of applications
Really hunderds and thousands? I think it is more in tens ballpark, 20
at the best
Am 01.08.2010 16:40, schrieb Ross Scanlon:
On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 16:08:10 +0200
Ulf Lamping wrote:
Am 31.07.2010 14:00, schrieb Peteris Krisjanis:
2010/7/31 Ulf Lamping:
Please remember, that it's not done to change only the software (e.g.
mkgmap), but each rule file or alike in use
Am 31.07.2010 14:05, schrieb Frederik Ramm:
I, too, find your attitude funny. You spend an hour doing edits, then
cannot be bothered to spend a minute to think of a good changeset
comment.
That's one thing I want to do and the other I often find a burden to
enter. What's so funny about that?
Am 11.08.2010 20:26, schrieb SteveC:
Despite the discussion resulting from my post yesterday, there continue to be
individuals on the talk@ mailing list disrupting the community.
Well, who is really disrupting the community?!?
People like John Smith with a "usually high volume output", or the
Am 12.08.2010 22:17, schrieb Pierre-Alain Dorange:
80n<80n...@gmail.com> wrote:
[...]
That said, the strategy adopted by OSFM is one that is calculated to load
the bases in favour of enabling them to switch to ODbL eventually. They do
not intend to ask the whole community to vote on whether t
Am 13.08.2010 23:09, schrieb Frederik Ramm:
The problem is: The system is there to balance your right to say
something and the receiver's right to not be bothered by what you have
to say.
Someone who is interested in legal topics is invited to join legal-talk.
Someone who isn't should not have t
Am 19.08.2010 21:39, schrieb Frank Fesevur:
2010/8/19 Pierre-Alain Dorange:
For convent, monestary and generally religious place but not open to the
public there is no "official" tag. I just found a proposition (2) to tag
building=convent, building=monastery, buiding=seminary and even a
building
Am 14.10.2010 14:07, schrieb Milo van der Linden:
Dear 41latitude,
I came accross your blog on "critique of OpenStreetMap".
http://www.41latitude.com/post/1310985699/openstreetmap-critique and
read it with interest. Some points are true, others need better
explaination and I think you misinterpr
Am 16.10.2010 10:05, schrieb Richard Weait:
Anybody object to adopting a Code of Conduct for behaviour with
OpenStreetMap mailing lists, fora, blogs, and other communication
channels?
Yes, unless absolutely necessary (which I currently can't see), we
should *absolutely* avoid such guidelines.
Am 16.10.2010 10:54, schrieb Steve Bennett:
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Ulf Lamping wrote:
In the long run they tend to do more harm than good.
Hi, can you give an example of this?
The german Wikipedia has so much "please do this", "please read that" ,
"ple
Am 16.10.2010 14:15, schrieb Steve Bennett:
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 8:32 PM, Ulf Lamping wrote:
The german Wikipedia has so much "please do this", "please read that" ,
"please follow ...", ... that it turns out to be no more fun working there.
I've almo
Am 16.10.2010 14:36, schrieb Serge Wroclawski:
Here's the contents of that page, so we can discuss it on the list:
= Draft OpenStreetMap Code of Conduct =
Why did you leave out the "Violations and Enforcement" section of that
page altogether?
Please not again some voodoo-magic circle that
Am 16.10.2010 16:04, schrieb Serge Wroclawski:
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Ulf Lamping wrote:
Please not again some voodoo-magic circle that decides what is best for us
Do you have some suggestion?
Yes, don't do such things ;-)
Regards,
Am 21.10.2010 01:51, schrieb David Murn:
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 17:35 +0200, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Anyone interested in the openstreetmap tile downloader 5.0 ? It is now
available for only 29,95 $
http://www.bestsoftware4download.com/software/k-mapnik-t-free-easy-openstreetmap-downloader-dow
Am 06.12.2010 17:58, schrieb Serge Wroclawski:
The LWG is part of the OSMF, and the OSMF is who runs this project.
The LWG is part of the OSMF, and the OSMF is part of the ~3 people
who runs this project :-)
Regards, ULFL
___
talk mailing list
Am 08.12.2010 22:59, schrieb Steve Bennett:
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 8:33 AM, davespod wrote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners_Guide_1.1
See item 3.*
Very interesting. That line was added by "Ben" in January 2009, and
that sentence hasn't been touched since.
So the question arises
Am 08.12.2010 23:46, schrieb davespod:
By the way, I don't think the intention is to suggest that it is not ok to
trace an area and then visit it to correct errors and add detail. It is when
you are not going to do that, it is frowned upon. I can understand why. I
have cancelled a trip to survey
Am 09.12.2010 02:49, schrieb Kenneth Gonsalves:
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 08:59 +1100, Steve Bennett wrote:
(Personally, I would be arguing against it. "Don't do X because the
result would be less accurate than if you did Y" is an unhelpful kind
of perfectionism. The line makes the point that accura
Am 09.12.2010 12:42, schrieb Richard Fairhurst:
Ulf Lamping wrote:
Am 09.12.2010 02:49, schrieb Kenneth Gonsalves:
what I object to is mapping a place one has no intention of visiting
Fine, seems you don't like the wiki principle ...
I think you're getting confused with the
Am 24.01.2011 02:19, schrieb Anthony:
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Vincent Pottier wrote:
Le 24/01/2011 00:25, Anthony a écrit :
I'm not quite sure why, but I really don't like JOSM. Of the four
main editors (others being PL1, PL2, and Merkaartor), it's my least
favorite.
I realy don't
Frederik Ramm schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> Richard Fairhurst wrote:
>> There's three categories to consider relating to existing data.
>
>> 1. People who have made edits and can't be contacted.
>> 2. People who don't like ODbL and withdraw their data.
>> 3. Large organisations.
>
> I have a fourth cate
Frederik Ramm schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> OJ W wrote:
>> Currently OSM surveyors do their thing in the understanding that
>> cartographers will turn the result into something nice that they can
>> use (and the surveyors know that they will benefit from this due to
>> the map images being sharealike)
>
> T
Hi!
I'm not sure you're aware, but you're currently on the best way to make
the "license to kill" phrase come true!
First of all: If you're not aware, it's all about trust. When I first
uploaded data to OSM, I made sure about the license - so my effort
wasn't only commercially consumed. This
Tobias Knerr schrieb:
> Frederik Ramm wrote:
>> I have never mapped anything thinking
>> "hey, maybe someone else is going to make a nice map from this that I
>> can then use". Not one single time. I don't know if that makes me an
>> exception. Most people I talked to were enthusiastic about the
Russ Nelson schrieb:
> On Mar 9, 2009, at 3:07 PM, Matthew Toups wrote:
>> If we can't change the data, what's the point of having it in OSM?
>
> Having consistent metadata and a consistent single-source API.
>
On what bases would someone with no formal training, no legal deed
descript
80n schrieb:
>
> The problem with GPS toting mappers is that they will often believe
> their GPS tracks are at least as accurate as those used for all the
> other data in OSM, so there's a strong temptation to move things around
> a bit based on the information they have to hand - I know, I've
SteveC schrieb:
>> (This is meant as a funny way to say that, when other important
>> business
>> has been resolved, we should perhaps one day clean up the AoA; it is
>> not
>> meant to suggest that there was something wrong with those serving on
>> the OSMF board.)
>
> Well I don't really get
Mike Collinson schrieb:
> Simone,
>
> The ODbL is still a "BY-SA" license but written with databases rather than
> creative works in mind ("ODC-BY-SA"). So my opinion is that Frederik's advice
> is the right one, it depends on how narrow or wide-ranging the original
> authority was.
>
> At the
Hi!
Someone added amenity=food_outlets to the map features and even after
reading the comment "An area with several food outlets" I'm quite unsure
what this could be.
Is this a collection of several amenity=fast_food or a kind of
vending_machine or ...?
Can someone explain this a bit?
Regard
Adrian Moisey schrieb:
> Hi
>
> Someone else started a proposal for a gym, I need it in my area. So I'm
> finishing it off:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Gym
Why not simply use:
leisure=sports_centre
sport=work_out (or gymnastics or ...)
Regards, ULFL
_
Guenther Meyer schrieb:
> Am Montag 30 März 2009 schrieb Adrian Moisey:
>> Hi
>>
> Someone else started a proposal for a gym, I need it in my area. So
> I'm finishing it off:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Gym
Why not simply use:
leisure=sports_cen
Greg Troxel schrieb:
> David Lynch writes:
>
>> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 12:45, Maarten Deen wrote:
>
>>> Is it ok to use barrier=toll_booth for portals over the road with
>>> cameras for automated toll collection, like the ones used for LKW
>>> Maut (HGV toll) in Germany? To me, toll_booth indi
USHAKOV, Sergey schrieb:
> Paul, thank you for being the first to respond to my post with the new
> subject :)
>
> OSM wiki is a great resource and really does clarify a lot. Meanwhile it is
> "work in progress" like all wikis and still leaves some space for possible
> confusion here and there...
Stefan Baebler schrieb:
> It's nice seeing changing road width with zoom also in the legend!
>
> It would be also interesting to hide features that are not appearing
> in the map currently being shown.
> Sure it would require a bbox query, but it would be much more user
> friendly (eg when matchi
Tom Hughes schrieb:
> On 14/07/09 08:30, Bernhard zwischenbrugger wrote:
>
>> Now we have the changesets like
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/1815935
>>
>> It's relative easy to identify bad edits.
>>
>> Is it possible to add an "undo request button" or "spam button" to this
>> pa
Shaun McDonald schrieb:
>
> On 14 Jul 2009, at 09:50, Ulf Lamping wrote:
>
>> Tom Hughes schrieb:
>>
>>> because in general terms it won't work - reverting
>>> will often need manual intervention to resolve conflicts.
>>
>> I've h
Joseph Scanlan schrieb:
> On Wed, 29 Jul 2009, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
>> Well, I would tag them completely differently. It is a different kind
>> of object, it is not a Motel where you just pay according to a
>> different fee system / business modell.
>
> Around here I would not use a separ
Tom Hughes schrieb:
> The whole home page needs a redesign, and I don't really want to start
> fiddling with little things like this when we should be doing the job
> properly.
>
> There are also issues with search at the moment which mean we don't
> actually want to make it too prominent.
>
>
Martin Koppenhoefer schrieb:
> 2009/8/2 John Smith :
>>> list" but before annoying everyone on that list, I thought
>>> that which is the
>>> preferred tag should be decided.
>> JOSM has numerous tags that aren't "official"
>>
>> Speaking of which, can anyone think of a better way to put aren't lis
Martin Koppenhoefer schrieb:
> 2009/8/2 Ulf Lamping :
>> Well, when I introduced doctors in JOSMs mappaint (and Christoph to the
>> Presets), there was a clear majority of doctors and not doctor.
>>
>> If people use the term doctors, we shouldn't force them t
OJ W schrieb:
> On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 10:03 PM, Marc Coevoet wrote:
>> You can try the quadcopter too..
>
> how would launching a quadcopter into orbit help?
That's a small step for openstreetmap,
one giant leap for quadcopters
;-)
Regards, ULFL
___
Frederik Ramm schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> Tom Chance wrote:
>> 1 – Nobody can actually agree what highway=path means so it is being used
>> in different senses all over the world, which reduces its usefulness to
>> near zero
>
> Perhaps it really *is* useless and it was good that our process
> demonstrat
Roy Wallace schrieb:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Emilie Laffray
> wrote:
>> We should stop reinventing the wheel.
>> Let's work on those definitions first to make sure that everyone and every
>> languages are on the same wavelength.
>
> Agreed. I think:
>
> step 1) Work out how the tags a
Liz schrieb:
> On Wed, 12 Aug 2009, Nop wrote:
>> You cannot force anything but you can discourage putting presets for
>> disputed tags in editors (if it is frowned upon as some sort of indirect
>> vandalism and rolled back) and you can make an organised effort to bring
>> a newly established taggi
marcellobil...@gmail schrieb:
> Deal all,
> I'd like to propose a new tag:
>
> "geological=palaeontological_site".
>
> I would welcome comments on the Proposed Features page:
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/geological=palaeontological_site
Hi Marcello!
In my years of
John Smith schrieb:
> --- On Wed, 12/8/09, Kate wrote:
>> At the last DC mapping party in
>> Silver Spring, Maryland, I came across
>> a giant acorn that should be marked on OSM, but not sure
>> the best way
>> to tag it:
>
> tourism=viewpoint ?
To qoute Map Features about viewpoint:
"A place,
Vikas Yadav schrieb:
> I made this icon for JOSM.
> My not an artist.
> This is the top with walls on both sides.
Hi Vidas!
I'm not an artist as well.
Anyway, I've took your icon as an inspiration (your icon looked blurred
when scaled down to 16*16 pixels) and added a similar one to the JOSM
d
Patrick Petschge Kilian schrieb:
> Hi,
>
>> Am I missing something, But it would help if the Reply-to header on
>> all messages that go through the list(s) gets set to the list email,
>> so that when we hit reply the message goes to the list by default.
> In short you missed http://www.unicom.com/
Jonathan Bennett schrieb:
> Tobias Knerr wrote:
>> How about "offer reliable service with good uptimes"? After the recent
>> maintenance weekend it was stated that our services are not really
>> intended for the public (at least if they need them and don't just
>> experiment with them) and we are o
andrzej zaborowski schrieb:
> 2009/9/5 Apollinaris Schoell :
>> For any external use like SFD it makes sense to stay with a commercial
>> solution where they can get paid support and customization if needed.
>
> My only issue with this is that it places OSM behind Google, because
> when you go to
Robert (Jamie) Munro schrieb:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Ulf Lamping wrote:
>> Please also note, that it's really easy to switch from OSM to Google
>> maps (and back) if you're using openlayers. But you have to rewrite your
>> j
Serge Wroclawski schrieb:
> On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Ulf Lamping
> wrote:
>
>> Please also note, that it's really easy to switch from OSM to Google
>> maps (and back) if you're using openlayers. But you have to rewrite your
>> javascript code (co
Hi!
The openlayer wiki examples in [1] links to none existing example files
at [2].
Have the files moved somewhere else or are they gone due to the recent
dev server changes?
Regards, ULFL
[1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenLayers
[2] http://dev.openstreetmap.org/~edgemaster/OpenLayers
Tom Hughes schrieb:
> On 08/09/09 00:24, Thomas Wood wrote:
>> My apologies, I meant to change the links.
>> Try errol.openstreetmap.org/...
>
> Please don't do that, both because it doesn't work and because we don't
> have to get people used to referring to the machine by that name.
>
> You jum
Craig Wallace schrieb:
> On 09/09/2009 22:00, David Earl wrote:
>> On 09/09/2009 21:43, Valent Turkovic wrote:
>>
>>> Is grave_yard tag used? I don't see it in JOSM. Why is the wiki so
>>> confusing for this simple thing to map.
>>>
>> I think the original distinction was that a graveyard
Craig Wallace schrieb:
> On 10/09/2009 01:21, Ulf Lamping wrote:
>> Well, it's simply a bad thing to indicate stuff by something that's
>> "nearby". What's nearby? 1m/10m/100m/1000m? Is it indicated by a
>> place_of_worship, a building=church or xy?
&g
Hi!
The corresponding RFC was updated two times - now it seems to make sense
to most people.
Voting is opened for the next two weeks at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Fountain
Regards, ULFL
___
talk mailing list
talk@open
Hi!
There were some approvals in recent days.
Please don't forget to add them to
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Approved_features (simply moving
the according line from the proposed to approved page will do the trick).
I've added place=locality, but there might be others ...
Regards,
Hi List!
The voting about shop=dry_cleaning ended with 7 approvals and no
disapprovals.
I've moved it from the proposed to the approved pages and also added it
to the map features page.
Regards, ULFL
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
htt
Ulf Lamping schrieb:
> There's an RFC about shop=laundromat, please have a look at:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Laundromat
>
There were some comments and talk on the list about Laundromat vs.
Launderette vs. Laundry.
I've changed th
Robin Paulson schrieb:
> On 04/01/2008, Brent Easton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> You don't need any more votes. If there are no negative votes, then 6 Yes's
>> is enough to approve it.
>>
> it is? oh, i thought it was 10. 6 seems awfully low
>
> thanks though, wil move it across to app
Robin Paulson schrieb:
> On 04/01/2008, Michael Collinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> is there an acknowledged way of removing them, without going through
>>> the whole comments/opinions/voting process?
>>>
>> Ye, it would certainly be good to be more aggressive in cleaning up
>> up
Robin Paulson schrieb:
> could the person who proposed:
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Rest_Camp
>
> please provide some more information on the proposal?
>
> it is unclear what it is actually for, beyond duplicating a range of other
> tags
>
> failing that, could it
Hi List!
The voting about amenity=fountain ended with 13 approvals and no
disapprovals.
I've moved it from the proposed to the approved pages and also added it
to the map features page.
Regards, ULFL
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
htt
Hi List!
The voting about highway=living_street ended with 24 approvals and 15
disapprovals.
After a lot of discussion about this tag, I've approved it now - in the
end the proposal has a majority in it's current form. Reading most of
the comments and votes (again), I think that starting anoth
Frederik Ramm schrieb:
> Hi,
>
>> What about moving proposals not actively worked upon to a new
>> inactive_proposals page (or simply to the rejected features page)?
>>
> By the way, who has come up with these rejected/approved features
> pages?
Don't know.
> I don't like that too much -
Hi List!
The voting about moutain_pass=yes is still a bit undecided - we need
some more votes.
Please go and vote at:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Pass
Regards, ULFL
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://l
Robin Paulson schrieb:
> a new tag for proposal
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/paintball
>
> please could i get some opinions
>
> thanks
>
> ___
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/c
Hi List!
The voting about mountain_pass=yes ended with 18 approvals and 2
disapprovals.
I've moved it from the proposed to the approved pages and also added it
to the map features page.
Regards, ULFL
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
htt
Robin Paulson schrieb:
> this proposal has been open for voting for 8 weeks now
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Kiosk
>
> it has been approved with 14 yes votes
>
> it has been moved to the map features and approved features page
>
>
Hi!
There's a very similar prop
Hi List!
The voting about landuse=railway ended with 16 approvals and no
disapprovals.
I've moved it from the proposed to the approved pages and also added it
to the map features page.
Regards, ULFL
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http
101 - 200 of 256 matches
Mail list logo
