is mapped as a boundary, which I'm
pretty sure is the case for all the UK.
Cheers
Dave F.
On 02/09/2016 12:25, Jez Nicholson wrote:
Nice job.
Is the intention to apply fhrs:id only? I see that fhrs:rating and
fhrs:authority are offered in the iD editor. Personally, I would put
the id only
to save all that panning around.
Have you been in contact with anyone from the Trigpointing website?
Cheers
Dave F.
On 01/09/2016 17:16, Greg wrote:
Hi all,
Since my last email, I've analysed the relationship between the OS
triangulation station data and OSM 'man_made=survey_point's in Great
Britain
I'm surprised Wikidata is different to Wikipedia. I thought the former
was derived from the latter.
(btw The 7,172,036 figure isn't the latest data in Wikidata)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London
Cheers
Dave F
On 26/08/2016 11:57, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2016-08-26 12:20 GMT+02:00
Hi
What's new about this tag?
All tags can get filled with useless data.
Good use of tag:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/107775
Dave F.
On 21/08/2016 20:15, Michał Brzozowski wrote:
Recently, multilingual name support was rolled out. Still, seems that
the new name: tags get abused
On 24/08/2016 22:41, Michael Reichert wrote:
Beermap edits name, beer types and wifi
access.
Does it? I've never been able to get it to work, always had to open in
iD so end up just editing normally
Dave F.
___
talk mailing list
talk
next incarnation
Cheers
Dave F.
On 24/08/2016 19:03, Martin Raifer wrote:
I'm currently working on exactly such a tool. I haven't gone out with
it yet, but a first working prototype is here:
http://taghistory.raifer.tech/, the source code and some
instructions/caveats are found on github:
h
Hi All
I want to find out if a tag's usage is on the increase or decrease. Is
there a service which provides that data?
I looked at Taginfo but couldn't see any obvious way to do it.
Cheers
Dave F.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On 23/08/2016 17:04, Federico wrote:
Hi,
I've recently developed a Telegram Bot
(https://telegram.me/SearchAroundBot)
This URL is sending me to:tg://resolve?domain=SearchAroundBot
& give this error message:
Firefox doesn't know how to open this address, because one of the
following
Dave F.
On 03/08/2016 20:45, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
Dear all,
Today, v2.42.0 of the openstreetmap-carto stylesheet (the default
stylesheet on openstreetmap.org) has been released.
Changes include:
* Add rendering of amenity=charging_station and tourism=artwork
* Change icon of shop
If the technique below is to be used, please verify the note's location
is accurate. In my experience many have been way off.
Dave F.
On 22/08/2016 23:08, Toby Murray wrote:
Well you can go to the API and get the note XML which has the lat/lon
in it. The URL for this is:
http
Indeed. The likes of MapRoulette encourages unverifiable data to be
added to the database. I find it irritating that, in my locale, I have
to contact the mapper for between 80 & 90% of their edits.
Dave F.
___
talk mailing list
talk
can probably predict the response, but it might be worth personally
inviting user Alex Kemp to the meeting.
Dave F.
On 21/08/2016 09:59, ajt1...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20/08/2016 13:33, Colin Smale wrote:
In the East Midlands Alex Kemp has been adding relations for these
unparished areas,
I'm a bit confused. How was Great Britain defined before the creation of
these MPs?
From my own experience, changes to the appearance of Garmin maps are
often due to updated software used to manipulate OSM data. Mkgmap for
example.
Dave F.
On 18/08/2016 13:51, Andy Townsend wrote
I see you point, but boundary is always preferable if possible.
Geographical Suburbs appears ot be the main stumbling block.
I haven't studied Alex's edits in detail but from his diary he appears
to be duplicating; adding both boundary & is_in to the same entities.
Superfluous.
Da
re all correct in their
own way, but useful for different things.
As far as I can see is_in:* is used for the same things as boundaries,
but is less efficient & prone to errors.
Are you aware of any utilities that use is_in:*?
Cheers
Dave F.
_
'You are here' signs stacked on top of
each other & vehicles going round in circles.
Tagging *incorrectly* to suit the above is what's frowned upon.
Dave F.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
/076592.html
Dave F.
On 16/08/2016 16:01, Colin Smale wrote:
In the specific case of the UK, I am not convinced that is_in has no
value at all. This is because of the huge divergence between people's
perceptions and administrative reality. If you ask someone to give
their location/current address
r.
I also thought is_in:* was to be discouraged. Being hard coding, if a
boundary was to change all affected entities would become inaccurate.
Thanks
Dave F.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
+1
Also his use of is_in:* is also redundant when the boundary tag is used,
Dave F.
On 16/08/2016 13:25, Andy Allan wrote:
On 16 August 2016 at 13:11, Will Phillips <wp4...@gmail.com> wrote:
Regarding the 'ref:hectares' tag, it does seem wrong to me. It's not
consistent with othe
publicly tweeting the locations:
https://twitter.com/swasFT/status/566261258610278400
Dave F.
On 16/08/2016 09:35, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote:
Just to let you know, that I've now got another dataset in my
Defibrillator comparison tool athttp://robert.mathmos.net/osm/defib/
. East Midlands
& AFAIK, the major renderings don't show it.
Dave F.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
I hope there was more to the situation than just "identified & blocked".
OSM should be encouraging the use of it's database. Hopefully it was
explained to the site's developers how to implement it within OSM's
guidelines.
Dave F.
On 09/08/2016 23:34, Jon Burgess wrote:
On T
Just because it's very similar to OSM doesn't means it isn't using to
some other database. You're arguing what I believe is called a 'false
cause fallacy'.
You should be comparing it with aerial imagery not Google maps.
Dave F.
On 11/08/2016 15:40, Mishari Muqbil wrote:
This time I've shown
Hi
As has been pointed out, Uber's routing not following the inaccuracy
within Google doesn't prove they're using OSM.
Dave F.
On 11/08/2016 13:44, Mishari Muqbil wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've made some more quick comparisons here:
https://www.evernote.com/l/AAToqyEvUURAL71Q_xhbOB05s9mj-cH4Gg4
That's a failure of Nominatim so not a valid reason to amend tags
Dave F.
On 10/08/2016 16:20, heimlik...@mail.com wrote:
if you search a name from a bridge with the tag bridge_name, OSM is
not able to find the bridge.
here a link to test: www.openstreetmap.org/way/39333496
If you search
The ':' verses the '_' has been discussed repeatedly on the tagging forum.
I fell asleep before any conclusion was made. That's if any were drawn.
Somehow I doubt it.
Please do a search for those threads before making any edits.
Dave F.
On 09/08/2016 18:25, heimlik...@mail.com wrote:
Hello
As well as the MP problem, it appears many (all?) of your edits fail to
create a closed way therefore are not rendering.
Dave F.
On 05/08/2016 17:13, Christian Ledermann wrote:
I changed the logic, example changeset:
http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/changeset/90404
1) single polygons
On 05/08/2016 16:37, Colin Smale wrote:
Surely the tags should be on the MP relation, so you still only have
to edit one object?
Otherwise, maybe you could illustrate what use case you have in mind
when you say you have to "search for all members".
Geomet
On 05/08/2016 17:13, Christian Ledermann wrote:
I changed the logic, example changeset:
http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/changeset/90404
The way needs to be properly closed & there's no need for area=yes for
this amenity.
Dave F.
___
Tal
There's a clue in the name multi-polygon that singular entities
shouldn't be tag as such.
Dave F.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
hools, so I thought I'd do it for the rest
of them" is not a valid tagging technique.
Dave F.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
.
Dave F.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
It strikes me that it's you whose "at war"
On 19/07/2016 14:48, Greg Morgan wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 6:26 AM, Dave F <davefoxfa...@btinternet.com> wrote:
On 19/07/2016 14:01, Greg Morgan wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 5:38 AM, Dave F <davefoxfa...@btinternet.c
sers that mass edits like this
may not be the best way then it could prevent many further poor edits in
the future.
Dave F.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 19/07/2016 14:01, Greg Morgan wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 5:38 AM, Dave F <davefoxfa...@btinternet.com> wrote:
...Two wrongs don't make a right.
And yet you persist at your war.
Seriously?
Because it's wrong with what's in the real world. I'm proposing to
revert this cha
p; then ask on Talk-gb if those local to the
amendments can clarify what is the correct tagging to use.
Dave F.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
hink
removing the highway tag makes them even more inaccurate.
As can be seen I left a message, but not relieved a reply even though
he's made further edits.
I think the changeset should be reverted, but opinions welcomed.
Dave F.
___
talk mailing list
to their
destinations. ;-)
Dave F.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 13/07/2016 11:10, Frederik Ramm wrote:
W3W is a coordinate system...
I fail to see how it can even be described as that as there is no
coordination. The address of one block has no relation to adjacent ones.
Dave F.
___
talk mailing list
On 11/07/2016 16:55, john whelan wrote:
How would we make use of it?
We won't.
This system isn't relative. There's no way of knowing the address of the
adjacent blocks. I doesn't work in the real world. Even antiquated UK
postcodes have rough relativity.
Let's face it, it's a joke.
Dave
Hi
To check, are editors able to create OSM slippy maps on this account? I
believe there's a certain type of WP account that doesn't allow it.
Cheers
Dave F.
On 01/07/2016 16:38, Dennis Bauszus wrote:
I have setup a wordpress site.
http://osmuk.org/
Please drop me a mail if you want
Hi
The website os.openstreetmap.org has recently been upgraded, which is
great, but it's stopped accepting command line options such as zoom
level, co-ordinates etc.
Who can be contacted to see if this can be reinstated?
Thanks
Dave F.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast
It's only adding them to the single entity that's selected, killing two
birds with one stone.
It's good time saver
Dave
On 08/06/2016 17:44, Michael Reichert wrote:
Hi Bryan,
Am 08.06.2016 um 17:59 schrieb Bryan Housel:
- When setting Wikipedia field value, also set corresponding Wikidata
Hi
Some existing schools are having their URN ref updated. Is this a one
off or continuous process? What prompts the renumbering?
If they're all going to change, it defeats the purpose of including them
in the OSM database.
Dave F.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast
Have you been in contact with this organisation?
http://www.heartsafe.org.uk/AED-Locations
Dave F.
On 21/05/2016 19:48, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote:
On 22 April 2016 at 14:43, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists)
<robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com> wrote:
A rough and ready tool can be
.
Dave F.
On 13/05/2016 10:08, David Woolley wrote:
On 12/05/16 23:53, Andy Townsend wrote:
It depends where you are, I think. Certainly the canal towpath nearest
to me (Cromford Canal) is mostly public footpath. It's all been
surveyed, and the designation has been added fairly conservatively, i.e
Thanks
* I meant restoring not redacting.
Should we point out there's a quicker way than doing each edit
individually or is this a good way to learn a lesson? ;-)
Dave F.
On 08/05/2016 13:38, Philip Barnes wrote:
On Sun, 2016-05-08 at 13:11 +0100, Dave F wrote:
Did someone contact him
Did someone contact him, as he appears to be redacting.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38353814/history#map=15/55.4568/-3.6478
On 07/05/2016 22:21, Donald Noble wrote:
Hi all,
I spotted in Edinburgh first, and across the central belt of Scotland,
that a relatively new user, tintin2873
sight of what OSM is about.
Dave F.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On 27/04/2016 13:52, Gregory wrote:
I'm surprised we've got such a short list of members.
Could it be that many just aren't interested in A/EGMs, Associate
members, committee meetings, agendas or minutes & just want to go out & map?
Dave F.
---
This email has been checked for
(see the bus route relation on Church
Road). It makes it extremely hard to select the correct ways in some
editors.
Dave F.
On 23/04/2016 14:20, Tom Chance wrote:
Hi all,
It has been a very long time since I last posted here!
I'm trying to use the Overpass API to extract all the roads
Announced yesterday: Tesco is set to introduce defibrillators in over
900 of its largest stores
http://www.tescoplc.com/index.asp?pageid=17=1350
Dave F.
On 22/04/2016 14:43, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote:
It was suggested that trying to increase our mapping of public
Defibrillators
I noticed if 'cem' is typed in the wiki's search box it displays
Cemetary as the option.
Amending that /might/ help reduce the mistakes
On 24/03/2016 11:14, Stuart Reynolds wrote:
Hi all,
A user of our site alerted me to an incorrect spelling of “cemetery” in one
location. I corrected it,
exclusiveness does nothing to promote a "community"
which many wish to attain.
Dave F.
On 02/04/2016 00:21, Dave F wrote:
On 30/03/2016 22:20, Ian Sergeant wrote:
I've never seen it as a hotbed of uncountered policymaking.
This is another case which confirms my point: As there's no recor
told it was used to make decision
about OSM. They wanted to talk to 'like minded people', away from all
the 'noise'. (paraphrased)
On a slight tangent, it's disappointing that the developers of the iD
editor are reluctant to discuss its tagging features on the tagging forum.
Dave F
/progress/BA/
Cheers
Dave F.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Hi Michael
On 29/03/2016 21:58, Michael Reichert wrote:
Hi Dave,
Am 29.03.2016 um 22:45 schrieb Dave F:
Because IRC works in real time. Contributors have to be in the same time
zone (or stay up really late/ get up really early). It's biased towards
densely populated zones ie Northern Europe
a
whispered conversation; something that only teenage girls usually do.
Who does it exclude that is included by Slack?
If Slack keeps a record that can be contributed to by others at a later
date then that would be an advantage over IRC.
Dave F.
---
This email has been checked for viruses
ish bins has an ID number.
Who knew?
I'll be using a combination of Leaflet/Umap to do a contract & compare
of the datasets & Potlatch's excellent 'Tasks' utility to add
information, but only after verifying it with a ground survey. I think
I'm going to be busy.
Dave F.
On 29/03/
Yeay! Another communication forum. Just what OSM needs.
On 26/03/2016 19:59, Steve Coast wrote:
Ok so look, Slack took over the world. And it turns out it’s pretty
good and useful. Let’s have an official OSM slack.
—
Due Diligence:
https://www.google.com/#q=slack+site:wiki.openstreetmap.org
rld, who
will be the "we", as in "we feel OSM is doing this incorrectly/correctly?
Who are the OSM contributors you believe you will represent?
Thanks
Dave F.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://
? Are they all
required? Amending the geometry of such ways is very awkward & time
consuming.
Dave F.
On 17/03/2016 22:44, Adrian wrote:
A user of the iD editor has added a new way along an existing way, with the two
ways sharing the same nodes. In so doing, he has replaced all the n
& in various electronic formats as stated in
previous posts.
However they're not that accurate & should really only be used as a
guide for on the ground surveying & confirmation of their designation.
I couldn't see a changeset comment. Have you contacted him?
Dave F.
On 15/03/2016
On 15/03/2016 23:27, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote:
(Most of the datasets on http://www.rowmaps.com/ still say
they're under the old OS OpenData Licence.)
If you click through on the opendata hyperlink it states it's OGLV3. At
least on the ones I've checked.
Dave F..
---
This email
's for another
discussion
Cheers
Dave F.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
+1
This corroborates what I said on the changeset & how I mapped it.
Dave F.
On 14/03/2016 10:43, Stuart Reynolds wrote:
The one pub that I plotted, I added when I was doing a couple of
nearby schools and noticed that it was missing. I used exactly the
same principle as for the sch
I haven't been paying full attention to this. Are we not meant to add a
wikipedia tag any more?
Could you give a brief update on the proposal please.
Cheers
Dave F.
On 10/03/2016 17:57, Edward Betts wrote:
I've extended my search for matches between OSM and Wikidata again. It now
covers all
spending far to much of my OSM time sorting out
other peoples cock-ups.
I failing to see how not having to revert can possibly be quicker than
having to!
It's disappointing to see there's a few people who actively advocate the
adding of data that is knowingly incorrect.
Dave F.
---
This email
FYI My avast virus software alerted that ink: HTML:Script-inf
On 01/03/2016 12:36, Rob Nickerson wrote:
Hi all,
We have a maproulette challenge for UK schools!! Thanks go to Martijn
for setting this up.
We’re live:
http://maproulette.org/#t=ukschools/6d5899d6-facc-4460-b152-6e0ac68188bb
I believe visibility of the lanes isn't necessarily the problem, but the
tagging scheme. Actually, I should say schemes; quite difficult to
memorise the differences. And that's before finding out if taxis,
motorbike, bicycles or even cars are permitted.
Dave F.
On 24/02/2016 18:02, Richard
even less encouraged to use iD after a couple of conversations with
two of the developers (the only two?). They appear resentful to many of
the suggestions for improvement.
From memory Richard F. was a developer in the start up of iD, Is he
still involved?
Dave F.
On 25/02/2016 09:30
Not 100% sure, but from a quick check it seems they're using the tag
data as well: currency:XBT & payment:bitcoin in my area.
Dave F.
On 11/02/2016 00:53, Ian Dees wrote:
When you have a question about where the map data comes from, open up
your browser's developer tools and
That's great I suppose, but wouldn't using simple language in wikis be
much easier?
Also, your page isn't linked from anywhere. which is half the point of
hyperlinked wiki pages?
Dave F.
On 07/02/2016 15:24, Martijn van Exel wrote:
There is now a wiki page. I initially added the content
t
isn't in common usage.
You can help doing this, too.
Again, how?
PS This post is a good example why I don't use IRC. Responses there only
helps one user. Here on the list or web forums a record is kept that
*all* can read & learn from.
Dave F.
--
Hi
Bing aerial map:
http://binged.it/1STgxSc
While doing the schools project I've come across this grid layout on a
few occasions & I'm curious what activity/sport it's used for.
Who's got teenage kids that would know?
Cheers
Dave F.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by A
(either Bing or on the ground) These seasonal
pitches can often overlap. Rugby & Cricket being common place.
Dave F.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
___
Talk-GB mailing list
hion 6 months later).
Please keep all wiki pages plain & simple.
Cheers
Dave F
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.o
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Overpass_turbo/MapCSS
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/e7F
Dave F.
On 01/02/2016 17:02, Gregory wrote:
Cheers Dave, the "sets" feature of Overpass is good to know about.
However the set logic isn't what I'm after as such.
I want to all schools
I note the edubase website has Eastings & Northings. If they're more
accurate than postcode centroids is there a way to
'scrape' the website as they don't appear to be in the downloaded database?
Cheers
Dave F.
On 26/01/2016 19:38, Rob Nickerson wrote:
A third update on the quarterly pro
to indicate the reason? It
would save users from double checking.
On your OSM Keys page, what's the significance of the yellow/grey shading?
Cheers
Dave F.
On 24/01/2016 09:49, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote:
Just a quick note to say that I've updated the matching used in my
tool at http
find it irritating that businesses appear obsessed with changing them,
especially sub pages). Either use a validator, such as Keep Right to
check after adding them all or if you have the time, do a web search to
ensure the current URL.
Dave F.
---
This email has been checked for viruses
ol which is not ideal for filtering data.
Dave F.
On 17/01/2016 11:29, Lester Caine wrote:
On 17/01/16 09:48, Ed Loach wrote:
I'd like some advice please on how to tag 2 Schools that use the
one site.
Lester replied:
What I've done initially is tagged the buildings of each part with the
corr
p; names (Junior, senior; upper, lower etc).
Dave F.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
I've been following this wiki:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:
On 15/01/2016 14:13, Paterson, Keith wrote:
I'm mapping in Skye & Highland from my couch and have cone across
Schools that have been closed. How do we map them as closed?
Example Inverasdale Primary School
issing. I also wanted to do
start with my local county rather than by postcode so I've used Overpass
Turbo to retrieve the relevant data: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/dIG
(change county name>run>Export>geojson)
Cheers
Dave F,
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antiv
FYI (although you've probably already noticed) The database was updated
yesterday.
Dave F.
On 08/01/2016 09:33, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote:
On 7 January 2016 at 20:48, Brian Prangle <bpran...@gmail.com> wrote:
Also I'm finding that frequently I'm adding names to pre-existing
.
Dave F.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On 07/01/2016 13:10, Simon Poole wrote:
Am 07.01.2016 um 12:04 schrieb Dave F.:
It needs clarifying that it's using Google maps/Streetview that's
unauthorized.
I use Google almost every time I add to the database. For example in
Great Britain there's currently a project to map & update
isn't
permissible.
If search for a single school name, Google (or one of the many others
available) returns the URL for that single school. Has it delved into
it's stored information or returned up to date information on the fly?
I then search for the next name I require. The engine creates a new
Hi BZ
I put all other data relating to the whole school (name, address,
website etc) on the boundary way. Many organisations such as schools,
universities & hospitals etc have distinctive departments. These can be
identified by adding names to each building.
Dave F.
On 03/01/2016 1
minutely & it uploaded successfully.
Obviously this isn't practical if doing it to a larger number of entities.
How do I get JOSM to recognise the file as edited data?
Hope you can help
Cheers
Dave F.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.c
On 02/01/2016 12:51, Brian Prangle wrote:
That gives a total of 32,318 schools. Taginfo shows 27,191 schools
which is 84.1% coverage in OSM. However 6,348 are represented as nodes
only. It would be great to have these as polygons and associated
buildings. It would also be great to have close
to be performed
in one session?
Cheers
Dave F.
On 23/12/2015 15:37, Jo wrote:
In XML (the raw .osm format) you can also solve this.
Use JOSM to download both relations, save them as an .OSM file.
Open the file with a text editor and do some copy/pasting so only 1
relations is left with the original id
possible in JOSM?
Cheers
Dave F.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
All
This maybe old news to some of you but I thought it was pretty cool:
http://blog.nadnerb.co.uk/?p=209
Dave F.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
___
Talk-GB mailing list
On 14/12/2015 08:25, Sarah Hoffmann wrote:
Some helpful person has put a wikipedia link to the Starbucks
wikipedia page on every single Starbucks in Japan. That's what
throwing off Nominatim. Having a wikipedia page boosts the importance
of an object.
Have you considered that the program is
nd.
I've always read the brackets to mean 'leading to' or 'via' not as being
shared. From the Highway Code: "Motorways shown in brackets can also be
reached along the route indicated."
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/the-highway-code/traffic-signs
Dave F.
---
This email has been checked
On 07/12/2015 18:11, Philip Barnes wrote:
I have noticed that he is at it again and has not responded to either
my comment with regards to the A50, or chillly's comments with regard
to the A161.
I think a zero-hour block is probably called for, if only to grab his
attention.
Dave F
s has lead to tag
duplication which can never be a good thing.
Are there any roads in GB where references are shared? If not, I see no
reason for their existence.
Dave F.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com
How do you perceive these "dangers" will manifest themselves?
Dave F.
On 24/11/2015 23:01, nicolas chavent wrote:
Hi all,
Apologies for crosspostings, resending to talk an email sent to
osmf-talk about the HOT US Inc presence at the Board of the OSMF.
Best,
Nicolas
Dear O
601 - 700 von 1486 matches
Mail list logo
