Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] Kansas City addresses from maps.kcmo.org

On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 4:51 PM, Kevin Kenny wrote: > Property lines also define the bounds of public areas like parks, > schoolyards, cemeteries, and airfields, which surely do belong in OSM. They > aren't infallible, but they are often more precise than guessing from >

Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] Kansas City addresses from maps.kcmo.org

On Jul 28, 2016 6:14 PM, "Clifford Snow" wrote: > While property lines don't belong in OSM, they can be useful. Having parcel boundaries can be useful to figure out the address of a building. Especially if you can get access to the property, i.e. the owner has no

Re: [Talk-es] Quedemos en Zaragoza en Septiembre

Buenas, Yo me apunto también y estoy dispuesto a echar una mano con la organización o lo que haga falta. Es una buena oportunidad para vernos las caras y mover cosas todos juntos :) Saludos, Alejandro Suárez On Fri, Jul 29, 2016, 00:49 Miguel Sevilla-Callejo wrote: >

Re: [Talk-es] Quedemos en Zaragoza en Septiembre

¡¡Muy buenas noticias y muy buena iniciativa!! ¿Se sabe las fechas de la reunión de Wikimedia? No se me ocurre más que decir que que ME APUNTO! Un saludo Miguel -- *Miguel Sevilla-Callejo* *Doctor in Geography* a. Associate Lecturer at Dpto. of Geography & Territorial Planning at University of

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Rendering of stream "Leie" broken

Now back on topic: we have the Leie's banks back on the render. On donderdag 28 juli 2016 17:54 Jakka wrote: > https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/646584#map=17/50.82877/3.25798=N > > Please feedback what and where was the cause There were two places where there were problems with relation

Re: [OSRM-talk] OSRM 5.3.0 API polyline encoding precsion question

This feature request is tracked in: https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/issues/2485 Now, in case you want to get your hands dirty I'm glad to help you getting started :) Cheers, Daniel J H On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 10:54 PM, Alex Farioletti wrote: > I'm upgrading

Re: [Talk-de] eigener OSM-Webserver

On Thu, 28 Jul 2016 09:39:48 +0200, Markus wrote: > Liebe Entwickler, > > Ich suche ein HowTo für einen eigenen OSM-Webserver... > (ohne eigenen OSM-Renderer, ohne eigene OSM-DB) > > Anforderungen: > - Webspace: bei freiem Provider (z.B. bplaced) > - Basiskarte: OSM-Mapnik von OSM-Server > -

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Rendering of stream "Leie" broken

On 28-07-16 22:38, Karel Adams wrote: > Hehe, Glenn, zo'n openhartig antwoord apprecieer ik wel. Ik heb geprobeerd het proper te houden met respect voor de mening van ieder individu, vandaar dat ik me oprecht afvroeg wat 'veel' voor je betekende. :) > Wat ik eigenlijk bedoelde te zeggen: er moet

Re: [Talk-cz] budova pod zemí

Nájezd se jinak otevírá zítra. Dne 28. července 2016 22:59 Milan Cerny napsal(a): > Při mapování nového nájezdu na Brumlovce jsem si všiml nedaleké vodárny. > Je to částečně podzemní stavba, zasypaná hlínou a porostlá travou. > Na místě je viditelný pouze zvýšený terén

[Talk-cz] budova pod zemí

Při mapování nového nájezdu na Brumlovce jsem si všiml nedaleké vodárny. Je to částečně podzemní stavba, zasypaná hlínou a porostlá travou. Na místě je viditelný pouze zvýšený terén pravidelného tvaru. V OSM je tagováno podle ruian jako průmyslová budova. Jak takovéto částečně podzemní nebo

[OSRM-talk] OSRM 5.3.0 API polyline encoding precsion question

I'm upgrading from the 4.0 API to 5.0 and I have a problem / questions: can I set the polyline encoding precision on the server back to 6 from 5? is it a simple change to the profile.lus i'm using? or do i have to get my hands dirty with the source before i build it? I have been storing the

[Talk-cz] Kruhové objezdy Mělník

Dobrý den, jelikož ještě neumím malovat kruhové objezdy mohl by je někdo namalovat nové kruháky na Mělnílu v OSM? Jeden http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/642144#map=18/50.34510/14.49696=N a druhý http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/642143#map=19/50.34750/14.49237=N Ono to v žádné mapě (kromě

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Rendering of stream "Leie" broken

On donderdag 28 juli 2016 20:38 Karel Adams wrote: > Wat ik eigenlijk bedoelde te zeggen: er moet toch ergens een "howto" of > een "preferred practice" zijn voor het mappen van een courant en > essentieel landschapselement als een rivier? > > Enne, jawel, het ging er me over dat er op tijd van

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Rendering of stream "Leie" broken

Hehe, Glenn, zo'n openhartig antwoord apprecieer ik wel. Wat ik eigenlijk bedoelde te zeggen: er moet toch ergens een "howto" of een "preferred practice" zijn voor het mappen van een courant en essentieel landschapselement als een rivier? Enne, jawel, het ging er me over dat er op tijd van

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Rendering of stream "Leie" broken

On donderdag 28 juli 2016 22:21 Glenn Plas wrote: > On 28-07-16 22:03, Ruben Maes wrote: > > On donderdag 28 juli 2016 21:56 Glenn Plas wrote: > >> No , not for canals, when I researched this became pretty clear this > >> was only meant for rivers. But the Leie is a river so it's ok here. > > >

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Rendering of stream "Leie" broken

On 28-07-16 22:03, Ruben Maes wrote: > On donderdag 28 juli 2016 21:56 Glenn Plas wrote: >> No , not for canals, when I researched this became pretty clear this >> was only meant for rivers. But the Leie is a river so it's ok here. > > Well that's weird, because there's a canal connected to the

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Rendering of stream "Leie" broken

Wat ik in dit hele verhaal compleet niet snap: Waarom is e nu klapsplots zoveel te doen over het mappen van 1 rivier (en dan nog *) Waarom zou die Leie anders gemapt worden dan de Rijn of de Seine of de Nete, Klein of Groot? Verder bemoei ik me niet met de discussie, ze gaat duidelijk

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Rendering of stream "Leie" broken

On donderdag 28 juli 2016 21:51 Marc Gemis wrote: > Some background: the natural=water, water = x was proposed by Zverik. > His idea was to make it easy for mappers using aerial imagery to map > anything "water"-like with natural=water, eventually someone would add > the water=x detail. x, can be

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Rendering of stream "Leie" broken

On donderdag 28 juli 2016 21:56 Glenn Plas wrote: > No , not for canals, when I researched this became pretty clear this > was only meant for rivers. But the Leie is a river so it's ok here. Well that's weird, because there's a canal connected to the river and it also needs cleaning, and we

Re: [Talk-cz] Nájezd Brumlovka?

Byl jsem se tam podívat, prošel to a zaměřil. V OSM jsem to už opravil a pustil. Milan __ > Od: Jan Martinec > Komu: talk-cz@openstreetmap.org > Datum: 28.07.2016 20:35 > Předmět: Re: [Talk-cz] Nájezd Brumlovka? >

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Rendering of stream "Leie" broken

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 28-07-16 21:42, Ruben Maes wrote: > Hi Glenn > > We can do away with the relation and make sure waterway=riverbank > is placed everywhere. But this has seemed always strange to me: for > canals as well? A canal is not a river, and the wiki on >

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Rendering of stream "Leie" broken

Some background: the natural=water, water = x was proposed by Zverik. His idea was to make it easy for mappers using aerial imagery to map anything "water"-like with natural=water, eventually someone would add the water=x detail. x, can be pond, stream, river, canal, oxbow, etc. etc. [1] carto-css

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Rendering of stream "Leie" broken

Hi Glenn We can do away with the relation and make sure waterway=riverbank is placed everywhere. But this has seemed always strange to me: for canals as well? A canal is not a river, and the wiki on waterway=riverbank says: "This describes the tagging scheme for large rivers", linking to the

Re: [Talk-cz] Zelena Velka Chuchle - Modranska rokle

Mám to rozdělaný. Před týdnem jsem chtěl projít zbytek ale vyhnala mě bouřka. Těch změn ve vedení tras tam je hodně, už mi chybí jen ta zelená z Modřanské rokle do Bráníka + fotky rozcestníků. Snad příští týden. Milan __ > Od: Jethro

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Rendering of stream "Leie" broken

Hey Ruben, >> I do not see the merit of natural=water scheme at all on a river or a >> canal. It's a waterway. imho, there is nothing to migrate to. >> Unless I seriously missed something, the way to do it is the way (not >> the area) is the logical waterway. > > Both have disadvantages. They

[Talk-us] Kansas City addresses from maps.kcmo.org

address, owner, and property line data can be downloaded from http://maps.kcmo.org/apps/parcelviewer/ as a CSV file. I just called 311 a few minutes ago, and they said that this data is in the Public Domain. Not sure if that's sufficient permission. I'm not sure if property lines and ownership

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Rendering of stream "Leie" broken

On donderdag 28 juli 2016 20:42 Glenn Plas wrote: > On 28-07-16 20:10, Ruben Maes wrote: > > On donderdag 28 juli 2016 19:34 Glenn Plas wrote: > >> Ik vraag me ook sterk af wat de bedoeling is van de 2de relatie > >> die ook Leie heet waarin enkel de riverbanks steken. > > > > I believe someone

[Talk-cz] Zelena Velka Chuchle - Modranska rokle

Zdar, kdybyse někdo měli náladu na pražskou turistiku, tak jsem dneska na iDěsu narazil na tohle: http://praha.idnes.cz/pesky-po-zelene-lesem-dojdete-z-chuchle-az-do-modran-fxb-/metro.aspx?c=A160728_073000_praha-metro_jsk Jethro ___ Talk-cz mailing list

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Rendering of stream "Leie" broken

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 28-07-16 20:10, Ruben Maes wrote: > On donderdag 28 juli 2016 19:34 Glenn Plas wrote: >> Ik vraag me ook sterk af wat de bedoeling is van de 2de relatie >> die ook Leie heet waarin enkel de riverbanks steken. > > I believe someone tried to migrate

Re: [Talk-cz] Nájezd Brumlovka?

Jo, je to zcela bezpochyby ono. (Tetelil jsem se, jak to zmapuju - a nezmapuju, uz je to tam). Mimochodem, to je kompletni stav - najezd pouze od Brumlovky, nikoli od Budejovicke; vic toho ani nebude, jen to nekdo pak musi prehodit z construction=*. HPM On 07/28/16 12:37, Marián Kyral wrote:

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Rendering of stream "Leie" broken

On donderdag 28 juli 2016 19:34 Glenn Plas wrote: > Ik vraag me ook sterk af wat de bedoeling is van de 2de relatie die > ook Leie heet waarin enkel de riverbanks steken. I believe someone tried to migrate to the natural=water scheme but didn't remove the waterway=riverbank. > Als ik straks ga

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Repère géodésique et limite communale

> Je pense que Osmose va râler. En effet, il ne faut jamais modifier > les points géodésiques, ils doivent rester en v1. Je me suis peut-être mal expliqué, c'est bien la limite qu'il faut déplacer, pas le point. Mais compte tenu de la note d'avertissement, peut-on inclure un point géodésique dans

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Repère géodésique et limite communale

Donc j'utilise ce point dans le tracé de la commune. En zone de montagne le cas de sommets servant de point géodésique et de limite communale est assez courant (ainsi que l'erreur "Survey point out of boundary"). Le jeudi 28 juillet 2016 à 13:45 +0200, Philippe Verdy a écrit : > Les points

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Rendering of stream "Leie" broken

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ik vraag me ook sterk af wat de bedoeling is van de 2de relatie die ook Leie heet waarin enkel de riverbanks steken. Als ik straks ga meten hoelang de Leie is adhv. deze data gaat dit niet juist zijn. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1201127

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Rendering of stream "Leie" broken

Seems someone screwed up the Leie multipolygon relation pretty bad. I can deal with it after dinner. On donderdag 28 juli 2016 18:56 Glenn Plas wrote: > Area=no should not be needed on a riverbank. It's implied by creating > a closed way. The problem is elsewhere. > > Glenn > > > On

Re: [OSRM-talk] OSRM on iOS

maps.me is using OSRM on mobile devices for offline routing :) https://github.com/mapsme/omim/tree/master/3party/osrm (although v4.6 which is over a year old now and we strongly recommend upgrading to a more recent stable release, since a lot moved in the last couple of month) Cheers, Daniel J

[Talk-in] WikiConference India 2016, Chandigarh - OSM Mapping Party

Hi all. WikiConference India 2016 is happening at Chandigarh Group of Colleges, Landran (Mohali) on 5, 6, and 7 August 2016. Its a pan indian meetup and 20+ Wikipedia language

Re: [Talk-br] Edições em Boa Vista que estão deslocando vários nós de roteamento.

é uma boa. Em 28 de julho de 2016 12:40, Adriano Rosa escreveu: > em casos semelhantes, deixo o pessoal treinar, desde que não destruam algo > importante, depois de um tempo, que eles já pararam de editar, reverto ou > corrijo as edições. > > faço isso para não

Re: [Talk-br] Edições em Boa Vista que estão deslocando vários nós de roteamento.

em casos semelhantes, deixo o pessoal treinar, desde que não destruam algo importante, depois de um tempo, que eles já pararam de editar, reverto ou corrijo as edições. faço isso para não desestimular a galera (vai que dali sai um mapeador) e porque é muito trabalho ficar corrigindo de imediato

Re: [Talk-br] Edições em Boa Vista que estão deslocando vários nós de roteamento.

Eu acabei enviando a reversão sem querer depois que enviei a lista, eu ia esperar vocês verem como estava. Agora já era. rs Em 28 de julho de 2016 12:32, Erick de Oliveira Leal < erickdeoliveiral...@gmail.com> escreveu: > Não parece haver nada de novo no que eles criam é só destrutivo mesmo, >

Re: [Talk-br] Edições em Boa Vista que estão deslocando vários nós de roteamento.

Não parece haver nada de novo no que eles criam é só destrutivo mesmo, eles movem e duplicam as coisas. Em 28 de julho de 2016 12:32, Erick de Oliveira Leal < erickdeoliveiral...@gmail.com> escreveu: > São 18 usuários, mas é o frocha que está coordenando. > > Em 28 de julho de 2016 12:26, Nelson

Re: [Talk-br] Edições em Boa Vista que estão deslocando vários nós de roteamento.

São 18 usuários, mas é o frocha que está coordenando. Em 28 de julho de 2016 12:26, Nelson A. de Oliveira escreveu: > Foram 18 usuários que começaram editando em Boa Vista ontem. > > Nesses casos só resta corrigir o que está errado, porque muito > dificilmente alguém responde

Re: [Talk-br] Edições em Boa Vista que estão deslocando vários nós de roteamento.

Foram 18 usuários que começaram editando em Boa Vista ontem. Nesses casos só resta corrigir o que está errado, porque muito dificilmente alguém responde ou entende o erro que fez. ___ Talk-br mailing list Talk-br@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-br] Versão Alpha/Inicial do Menu Inteligente OSM (extensão para navegador)

Não está disponível para Firefox 47.0 Em tempo, parabéns e obrigado pela iniciativa. Vai ser muito legal ter uma extensão assim. - - - · Atenciosamente, Márcio Vinícius Pinheiro http://about.me/Doideira Em 28 de julho de 2016 10:57, Wesley Martins

Re: [Talk-br] Versão Alpha/Inicial do Menu Inteligente OSM (extensão para navegador)

Muito útil!!! Parabéns! 2016-07-27 11:30 GMT-03:00 Alexandre Magno Brito de Medeiros < alexandre@gmail.com>: > Projeto (código fonte): github.com/jgpacker/*osm-smart-menu* > > > Em 26 de julho de 2016 23:22, John Packer >

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Problème d'accès à FR-BAN et FR-Cadastre !

Oui effectivement tout va beaucoup mieux. Merci pour la réactivité. Et le dieu OSM dit : que les bâtiments soient ! Nicolas Le 27/07/2016 19:14, Tyndare a écrit : Arghhh effectivement, je savais pourtant bien qu'il ne faut pas essayer de corriger ce qui marche. Normalement les bâtiments

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Repère géodésique et limite communale

Le 28/07/2016 à 01:30, Balaïtous a écrit : > Bonjour, > > J'ai une erreur "Survey point out of boundary" : > http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/error/7331972186 > > Ce point (http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/669987012) est un sommet, > j'ai ajouté les tags correspondants, et d'après le cadastre,

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Repère géodésique et limite communale

Les points géodésiques ne doivent pas être déplacés. Si ce sommet est une limite communale selon le cadastre, ajuster la frontière pour passer par ce point (les frontières communles ont fait l'objet d'une "conflation" entre plusieurs cadastre mais sans tenir compte des points géodésiques qui peut

Re: [OSM-ja] 歩道のマッピング

muramotoです。 柴田様の悩みポイントを理解できていない気もしますが、 私でしたらこんな感じで描くと思います。 (barrier=bollardは、余裕があったら描く程度でしょうか) ご参考まで [image: 埋め込み画像 1] ___ Talk-ja mailing list Talk-ja@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ja

[Talk-es] Quedemos en Zaragoza en Septiembre

Con las iniciativas para resucitar la asociación, quedemos para celebrar los 10 años de esta lista! Parece que hay bastante gente activa en Zaragoza que estarían dispuestos a colaborar. Así mismo, la gente the Wikimedia España (posiblemente) celebrará su congreso anual allí, y no me han puesto

[OSM-talk-be] What are the neede tag for "Mutuality ?" "Mutuelle" "Ziekenkas"

Hi, What are the neede tag for "Mutuality ?" "Mutuelle" "Ziekenkas" Office=insurance owner= or ownership=??? name=* http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office%3Dinsurance http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ownership thx ___

[Talk-de] eigener OSM-Webserver

Liebe Entwickler, Ich suche ein HowTo für einen eigenen OSM-Webserver... (ohne eigenen OSM-Renderer, ohne eigene OSM-DB) Anforderungen: - Webspace: bei freiem Provider (z.B. bplaced) - Basiskarte: OSM-Mapnik von OSM-Server - OpenLayer: OL-3 -- Layer mit Ergebnissen von eigenen Overpass-Anfragen