issue for that?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Marc
>
>
>
> Le 2016-09-28 17:55, Glenn Plas a écrit :
>
>> Made a tool to check, quite interesting results
>>
>> https://github.com/gplv2/urbis-validate
>>
>> Glenn
>>
>>
>>
>>
This is a better, cleaner query, accounts for addr:street nodes as well
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/iCO
On 28-09-16 11:44, Glenn Plas wrote:
> So, we are talking about this data : http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/iCN ?
>
> the addressed way's (e.g. buildings ) need to match the s
zijn.
Zie engelse uitleg: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Overpass_API/status
Nog even geduld dus tot alles terug normaal is.
Mvg,
Glenn
On 21-08-16 22:15, Glenn Plas wrote:
> On 21-08-16 21:46, Karel Adams wrote:
>> Hm, dank voor de tip, Glenn - maar is dat niet een beetje simpe
I don't think ignorance is a valid excuse for not exercising due
diligence. Especially in the publicity sector which is prone to
copyright violations. e.g. They should know better in that sector.
That being said, reality is indeed that people don't seem to care, so to
raise awareness we should
ingen van mezelf terug waarvan ik denk: waar was je toen mee
bezig !?!
Dus, maw: het was bijna allemaal ok, buiten dit kleine stukje.
Blijf trouwens goeie changeset comments geven, heel handig en belangrijk
om de context van de edits te snappen.
Mvg,
Glenn
>
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht---
en.
Wat ik trouwens wel een grappige changeset comment vind is de
problematische way : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/423643352/history
De comment van Jol dan. "Poging tot fix riverbank Leie" -> denk dat
Ruben dat dus goed heeft ingeschat.
+1 trouwens voor goede changeset comme
On 28-07-16 22:03, Ruben Maes wrote:
> On donderdag 28 juli 2016 21:56 Glenn Plas wrote:
>> No , not for canals, when I researched this became pretty clear this
>> was only meant for rivers. But the Leie is a river so it's ok here.
>
> Well that's weird, because ther
iece is preventing it from being rendered decently at the
moment.
If you want to take a stab at fixing it , go ahead. If you want me to
review it later on, give me the headsup and I'll take a look. A bit
short in time due to closing the books on the fiscal year of 2015. I
hate fines :)
Glenn
>
Hey Ruben,
>> I do not see the merit of natural=water scheme at all on a river or a
>> canal. It's a waterway. imho, there is nothing to migrate to.
>> Unless I seriously missed something, the way to do it is the way (not
>> the area) is the logical waterway.
>
> Both have disadvantages. They
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28-07-16 20:10, Ruben Maes wrote:
> On donderdag 28 juli 2016 19:34 Glenn Plas wrote:
>> Ik vraag me ook sterk af wat de bedoeling is van de 2de relatie
>> die ook Leie heet waarin enkel de riverbanks steken.
>
> I believe som
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ik vraag me ook sterk af wat de bedoeling is van de 2de relatie die
ook Leie heet waarin enkel de riverbanks steken.
Als ik straks ga meten hoelang de Leie is adhv. deze data gaat dit
niet juist zijn.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1201127
je met de auto bent dat je
moet rondrijden
https://www.mechelen.be/vernieuwing-nekkerspoel
>
>
>
> Op 12 juli 2016 13:49 schreef Glenn Plas <gl...@byte-consult.be
> <mailto:gl...@byte-consult.be>>:
>
> Idd, ik vrees dat Joost vooral naar WIFI heeft gezocht
Idd, ik vrees dat Joost vooral naar WIFI heeft gezocht, maar persoonlijk
zou ik daar men laptop niet echt meenemen/opengooien. Best wel
feesttent daar :)
On 12-07-16 13:41, Karel Adams wrote:
>
> De locatie is toch wel behoorlijk ongelukkig gekozen: bereikbaarheid is
> beperkt, zowel per auto
On 01-07-16 18:30, Gerard Vanderveken wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tested a bit the thing, but found it not so easy to start with it. The
> setup process is very sumier described and some parts are ommitted (JOSM
> remote control).
There is no setup process...
> A more step by step guide of the import
On 01-07-16 16:30, Marc Gemis wrote:
> I totally agree with you on that. I'm one of Glenn's beta testers and
> I have noticed that depending on the town, the data given by GRB/Crab
> can be good or very bad/outdated.
> Also the data is rather limited in the types of buildings that it
> recognizes,
> Now a few are really problematic:
>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3883031456#map=14/50.5168/4.6179
>
> Triangle : Sombreffe , Tongrinne and Boignee
This took me more than a few hours to fix entirely, hope it was worth
it. Pretty sure geocoding is going to work a lot better there.
I
Ok, I cleaned most of it up, there is in fact a few that are correct
positives, in particular:
Puivelde:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/300234626#map=18/51.17292/4.07075
Herhout: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/273054854#map=19/50.73002/3.96512
Haltine:
> Pascal's tool has a bug, but an interesting one. If two place nodes are
> in the exact same place, one of them is picked up as an unmapped place
> for some reason. I guess Pascal's process somehow only allows roads to
> be picked once.
> While that is a bit silly, it does identify duplicate
On 08-06-16 21:24, Marc Gemis wrote:
> I wonder how I can express this with an Overpass Query, especially
> when the amenity is mapped as a point in the separately mapped
> building.
Something like this:
ql:
node({{bbox}})[amenity];is_in;
(way[building](pivot);>;);out;
or my prefered xml
On 07-06-16 19:04, Jo wrote:
> I don't think there is a separate landuse=school. Schools generally fall
> inside a landuse=residential.
>
> It's possible to tag building=school. If there is more than 1 building,
> add an amenity=school for the school grounds. I'd put the addr
> information on
On 07-06-16 12:32, Killian De Volder wrote:
> On 02-06-16 17:44, Glenn Plas wrote:
>
>> Ik heb een tool gemaakt die redelijk af is maar er is zit een wat
>> diepere problematiek in de data die ik niet in 1 ,2 .. 3 kan uitleggen
>> op verstaanbare manier.
>>
>
On 07-06-16 12:46, Killian De Volder wrote:
> I think we should have a general register that defines what a tag implies for
> each road-law region (usually an entire country).
> (And this data should ideally not be stored in the Wiki, but rather inside
> OSM, or a file you can download to use in
Hi,
I've been playing with the data and checking this DAE/EAD data and it's
not so easy after all. There are several shortcomings in this dataset,
I'll list them up. But in general, it's not wel structured and it's
mixed languages as well. See url [3] for the files.
I was going to make an
elijker om geen bestaande buildings te
hebben met de semi-automatische import (vermijd je die problemen). Maar
ik begrijp je drive om die erin te krijgen.
> Ps.: Thanks for osmose !
Np, heel verslavend hee ? Ik fix ook graag. Check mss ook deze eens:
http://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/ind
n zijn "niet te vertrouwen". (De zwarte lijnen/punten, die
> door de landmeter, wel)
>
> @Glenn Plas: Jij bent ook als eens bezig geweest hiermee.
> Als jij je ervaringen ook eens kan delen zou dit wenselijk zijn.
>
> Dus de vragen die ik mij op dit moment vooral stel:
;
> So when is our next hackathon to work on things like this?
>
>
> 2016-06-01 16:00 GMT+02:00 Glenn Plas <gl...@byte-consult.be
> <mailto:gl...@byte-consult.be>>:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm not sure they can be vastly improved, it probably depen
Hi,
I'm not sure they can be vastly improved, it probably depends a lot on
what boundary.
In that understanding that there is lot's of stuff attached to those
boundaries that shouldn't be there. So when you are working to improve
boundaries, you'll need to address plenty of those cases, and
Hi,
It would be a fairly trivial task, don't think we need import approval
from upstream for a few thousand single nodes. It would be a bit like
importing VELO nodes (bike sharing). The license of this DAE data is open.
I've made a quality assessment tool to compair VELO nodes from VELO
Hi Joost,
Happy to receive a refund just in case ;-)
But even if not: this money will be well spent, I've give a lot to OSM,
but I sure have taken a lot from OSM as well, so for me -personally-
it's not a question of 'paying to volunteer'.
I would help anyway, because this is a passion. But I
Hey Jo,
Community tickets are 75 euro, and we indeed need them, even if you come
to help, which makes kind of sense to me since about everyone there
minus 10% will be a contributor in the broad sense of the word.
I just bought mine.
Glenn
On 03-05-16 09:39, Jo wrote:
> Do volunteers also need
Hey Ben/Pieter,
I was about to say maybe OKFN can help us. We really should sell cool
merchandise @ SOTM 2016, that is a golden opportunity imho.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Merchandise
And park all the proceedings with OKFN for OSM.be use and be transparant
on where the money goes.
I
k on a proposal.
I can encourage that on a personal level, I even admire this.. but be
prepared for backlash and emotional replies and endless discussions,
people that will pat your back and ride your rocket. In the end, the
community will decide.
Glenn
>
> Grtz,
> Pieter
>
>
> Op 21
On 21-04-16 15:58, joost schouppe wrote:
> No amen from me :) - as I just daid: the arguments used can be used for
> anything we do.
Not at all.. we are in the business of mapping, not groceries lists.
You need to stay loyal to the core idea and stop putting information in
OSM that is probably
I just had to update my example from 3 years ago because both source and
website key have changed.
website: went to pretty url's instead of id's
source: producer ID changed for unknown reason
It's already hard to keep those up to date. If you start putting in
volatile and variable data like
Use links to their products... after all... it's the internet.
example:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1381182781
Greetings,
Glenn
On 21-04-16 12:42, Pieter Brusselman wrote:
> How can I map farm-shops selling different kind of products? Eg.
> self-made cheese and potato's?
>
>
Try variations.
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/ffU
On 26-03-16 11:29, Karel Adams wrote:
> Kijkende naar de IJzertoren (het eerste voorbeeld dat me inviel) zie ik
> heritageyes
> historicmemorial
>
In Bastogne staat een M4,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2118551248
McAuliffe plein.
en in Wibrin
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3678713981
Glenn
On 26-03-16 11:11, Bart Vanherck wrote:
> Bij ons in Geel staat sinds kort een legertank aan aan speelbos.
>
> Hoe kan ik dit het beste
a looser qry (and XML readable ;-)
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/ffa
Think it never existed at all, the zero point is the license change,
i.e. around april 2010 I believe.
It's not really totally clear on that btw, if you happen to see
augmented diffs with negative numbering, they are from before
There are 2 users who are quite busy in that area, plenty of changesets:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/lf6648
The changesets I've checked haven't got landuse mods present. I've
scanned 1.6 million changesets of the last 30 days and none have the
keyword 'landuse' in the comments in that
Hi Jasper,
The amount is dependant on the type of vehicle euronorm, so you cannot
even store this in OSM as it depends on external factors.
It would be a bad idea, even if it wasn't as it is prone to change overtime.
Glenn
On 16-03-16 20:35, Jasper Michels wrote:
> Thank you for the answer
Glenn
>
> Case Closed.
>
>
> 2016-03-17 14:42 GMT+01:00 Glenn Plas <gl...@byte-consult.be
> <mailto:gl...@byte-consult.be>>:
>
> Hi Jasper,
>
> The amount is dependant on the type of vehicle euronorm, so you cannot
> even store this i
Hi,
Apparently it's not clear enough
You can't use it. It's not a matter of opinion nor I care what certain
persons from PICC said to someone else I don't really know. I should
not care either, because that's what licences are for. They show me in
clear language what can and cannot.
It's
Reading their license, this is not open data as they restrict the reuse
and retain the right to change the license later. This data should not
be used at all imho. Now my french isn't that great on the legal
vocabulary notes, and correct me if I'm wrong, but it doesn't look good
to me:
Hi Seppe,
I would hold off merging GRB data like axes into OSM.which is the
dataset you found these in? See
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/GRB
What is the added value in your view ?
Glenn
On 18-02-16 12:30, Santens Seppe wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> Are there any
Do you have a user id and/or nodes/ways ? We can check the history and
talk to this person, because in edit wars, it's usually the most
determined one that prevails, not always the correct one...
Glenn
On 04-02-16 11:29, Benoit Leseul wrote:
> FWIW I had the same problem in Brussels when I
I was reading this small arcticle,
http://www.citylab.com/commute/2016/01/germany-launches-its-national-bike-autobahn-cycle-network/422451/
So in Germany they just opened up a piece of a long bicycle highway, I
was intruiged, so I started looking for it in OSM. This is how germans
currently tag
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/267939617
> So nothing really special besides description that this is a 'highway'
> and width. (and ... foot=no !).
I forgot to mention the important fact that there is a route relation
for that purpose.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5697663
Glenn
On 28-01-16 08:16, joost schouppe wrote:
> Marc,
> If by "they" you mean "trage wegen vzw", I think they have a pretty good
> understanding of what does and does not belong in Openstreetmap. They
> actively promote OSM use amongst their public, which is a good thing.
That is true but I'm missing
Hi Wouter,
On 28-01-16 11:38, Wouter Hamelinck wrote:
>
> That is true but I'm missing a general mapping strategy, there is some
> widespread tag misuse IMHO.
>
>
> IMHO this is valid for any kind of mapping, even where there exist clear
> guidelines.
Yes you are totally right. But we
ce tag is present on the way, that would default to source=GRB, it's
important because it informs the next mapper to take into account it
came from a trustworthy source. it helps the decision process: "when
you want to change something, better make sure you doublecheck"
Glenn
> ?
&
On 26-01-16 05:33, Marc Gemis wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 1:48 AM, Glenn Plas <gl...@byte-consult.be> wrote:
>> Also, make sure when you create your better OSM bulding, tag it
>> source:geometry=AGIV (I think to recognise agiv sats).
>
> What do I have to d
07 'gemeentes' / general area's in the selection list. You
can combine some, but I haven't tried to combine all for a full download.
Glenn
>
>
>
> m.
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Glenn Plas <gl...@byte-consult.be> wrote:
>>
>>> I also mea
On 25-01-16 14:54, Marc Gemis wrote:
> So you are saying a need a couple of weeks more to finalise the tool.
More like a few hours (2/3 hrs). Cleanup the code a bit, perhaps remove
all my chaos inline documentation anchors :)
The verification part (with overpass stuff built in), I can write that
Hi Marc,
On 25-01-16 17:05, Marc Gemis wrote:
> A short question about source:geometry.
Feel free to ask
>
> Should I/we keep it when we modify the building afterwards. I'm
> thinking of the following cases
When I modified a building manually because GRB is not correct, I change
this to
On 25-01-16 19:38, Marc Gemis wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 6:50 PM, Glenn Plas <gl...@byte-consult.be> wrote:
>>> * splitting a building because the garage is clearly separated on AGIV
>>> imagery
>>
>> You should not have to do that imho, I've never
> However, before talking about relation, I think a specific value should
> be introduced for the _highway key_ : “cyclehighway" for instance. This
> would help the renderer to show those infrastructures differently than
> the usual “cycleway” (the infamous "piste cyclable” that usually sounds
>
> I also mean when the geometry in OSM is actually better than in
> the GRB. I'm thinking in particular about VIVES in Bruges. The GRB
> building shape is just wrong. In OSM it's better (may be not
> perfect, it's a complex building) and 3D mapped.
>
Nothing really special about them, highway=cycleway should be appropriate.
Glenn
On 24-01-16 13:12, Matthieu Gaillet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Below you will find some information about the developing bicycle
> highways (or fast cycling routes) a bit everywhere in the world.
>
> I was wondering if
The current test procedure respects previous editing work, because the
goal is not to import GRB data (not = CRAB) into OSM, but to improve
OSM data with GRB.
That means keeping history on an existing building intact, taking into
account that a human has entered the original tags in case of
On 22-01-16 09:19, Marc Gemis wrote:
> Glenn has just done 1 town. Yesterday I started using his tool to see
> how it works on a Mac.
Actually, it's not 1 town, it's an area : Stekene, Kemzeke, Klein-Sinaai
and everything in between.
> IMHO We can't do this on a large scale yet, since the
uot;buildings".
>
> m
>
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:43 AM, Glenn Plas <gl...@byte-consult.be> wrote:
>>>> Then you can use Shift to select 2 buildings, move finger to 't' and
>>>> poof, done.
>>
>> http://aptum.bitless.be/movies/stek
On 21-01-16 08:59, Jo wrote:
> Wow, that's great. I didn't realise you were that far along already.
Yeah, I was motivated but documenting all will probably take twice the
time, there are many things to account for and keep in mind, but I think
the method I used is pretty fast, it took me 3 weeks
>> Then you can use Shift to select 2 buildings, move finger to 't' and
>> poof, done.
http://aptum.bitless.be/movies/stek12.avi
You don't even need to select those 2 buildings in most cases:
- run the validator
- navigate to and select warnings like 'crossing buildings', 'building
inside
Since I've now written a tool to do this (and tested it), guess I have
to react now :)
On 21-01-16 05:38, Jo wrote:
> About that CRAB import. In The Netherlands they already created a tool
> to assist with that for their BAG import. I think we should look into
> reusing that, adapted to the data
>>
>> You don't repeat addr:city or addr:country and on every node/building in
>> Belgium either, we know where it is by using the coordinates. It's the
>> same for postal codes once you have the boundary borders, it's piece of
>> cake in any programming language to figure out if a point is
mooi mooi! Het valt me op dat de verschillen vaak voetwegen en/of
buurtwegen zijn. En hier en daar zelfs wegen die gepland zijn en dus
nog niet bestaan (en ook niet in OSM natuurlijk).
We moeten zeker opletten als je dit naar/met OSM wil migreren.
Ik ben niet kleurenblind denk ik maar
On 06-12-15 18:25, Bruno Veyckemans wrote:
> OK, Thanks for your answers.
>
> I understand that some of you consider postal code as redundant
> information in Belgium. Maybe it is... but I'm not 100% convinced ;-)
I consider repeating addr:postcode on every bloody building (node or
way) in OSM a
Misschien wel een opmerking, ik ben al enige tijd het GRB aan het
vergelijken (visueel) met OSM, en er zijn wel een aantal plaatsen waar
het GRB letterlijk achterloopt op de feiten.
Vaak is enkel de voorgevel correct maar in de 'diepte' gaat het vaak de
mist in, dus steeds combineren, AGIV+GRB
>>> namelijk vicinal_ref=* en vicinal_type=path/road
>>
>> Die kende ik niet, maar zet je dan de naam in de ref of zo ?
>
> 'k Had het ook zelf uitgevonden om het te kunnen taggen. Zie bijvoorbeeld
> deze
> wegen in Wommelgem http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/51.2037/4.5200 waar
> ik
>
Hi,
Effe korte peer check: Ik zie veel voetwegen verschijnen in de buurt,
op zich super natuurlijk maar ik begin een wildgroei aan tags te zien
voor dezelfde voetweg per segment. Het is een zootje aan het worden met
footways die overgaan naar paths en terug footway.
Naast het feit dat ze vaak
On 02-12-15 13:59, Ben Laenen wrote:
> Iemand die de Atlas der Buurtwegen aan het kopiëren is?
Ik denk eerder dat dit te wijten valt aan het inventariseren van 'trage
wegen' hier lokaal. Maar ik weet tenminste 1 weg waarbij de bewoner het
u heel hard ontmoedigd om zomaar op 'zijn' erf te
Hi,
Bing is usually a bad idea to use as it has issues with offset at the
deepest zoomlevels. Especially when you use it to 'fix' existing
buildings, you might find some community anger coming your way :)
You end up thinking all OSM Buildings are offset when they are not (if
source=Bing, they
k niet direct
>> kon plaatsen.
>>
>> Glenn
>>
>>
>> On 18-11-15 19:42, Glenn Plas wrote:
>>>
>>> De meeste ga je toch issue per issue moeten bekijken met kennis van de
>>> locaties, en huidige layout van de baan. Sat foto's enkel te betrou
De meeste ga je toch issue per issue moeten bekijken met kennis van de
locaties, en huidige layout van de baan. Sat foto's enkel te betrouwen
als ze recent zijn en er geen werken zijn geweest ondertussen.
enkele van die fouten zijn natuurlijk op te lossen. lanes, dat kan maar
1 cijfer zijn en
Kheb de lanes een fix gegeven, quick-fix voor R1, die moet geaudit
worden, want de JOSM validator gaf ook al warnings die ik niet direct
kon plaatsen.
Glenn
On 18-11-15 19:42, Glenn Plas wrote:
>
> De meeste ga je toch issue per issue moeten bekijken met kennis van de
> locaties, e
Hallo,
On 18-11-15 10:41, Karel Adams wrote:
> Allen,
> Dit zijn duidelijkerwijs paardenoefenbanen, inderdaad. Er liggen er zo
> heel heel veel in de landelijke gebieden van Vlaanderen. Vlieg maar eens
> een toerke mee en ge zult het wel zien! ;)
> Ik vraag me overigens af hoe relevant het is
Quick internet investigation
Using crab/agiv educated guess, that address is either number 258 or 260.
I can find business info back on 260A (which is below the loop)
Camator BVBA - Kortemarkstraat 260 Bus A
http://trendstop.knack.be/nl/detail/435178622/camator.aspx
"Levende dieren, veehandel
s moment I still do both building drawing and adding house
> numbers in 1 go, but I prefer to work more in residential areas
> (individual houses) than town centers (rows of houses).
>
> regards
>
> m
>
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Glenn Plas <gl...@byte-consult.b
it would be nice to see who actually created these things in the first
> place, but as a crude measure it might be worth exploring.
>
>
> 2015-11-17 9:11 GMT+01:00 Glenn Plas <gl...@byte-consult.be
> <mailto:gl...@byte-consult.be>>:
>
> Hi,
>
> La
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Glenn Plas <gl...@byte-consult.be> wrote:
>> and I encountered many
>> 'monumenten' from you, which I nicely migrated from node to buildings :)
>
> that's very kind of you. I didn't do that from the beginning, because
> it was t
On 17-11-15 12:10, Marc Gemis wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Glenn Plas <gl...@byte-consult.be> wrote:
>> You'll be surprised how much crap you find. In
>> my case half of them are from Marc, which I kind of skip.. since I know
>> what work he delivers I just
Hi,
Last touched says nothing imho. What does that really mean? If you
want to monitor an area for (auditing) changes use :
http://zverik.osm.rambler.ru/whodidit/
in combination with OSM history viewer.
http://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/index.jsp
You cannot measure contributions in this way.
overpass requests te maken.
Glenn
On 07-11-15 19:49, Louis van Boeckel wrote:
> Ik krijg telkens dit non "HTTP 200 OK" status: 429??
>
> Op 7/11/2015 om 20:31 schreef Glenn Plas:
>> Als deze het goed doet plots zijn we er nog niet uit, want er is
>> eigenlijk ge
Probeer deze link eens, bij mij werkt die prima.
http://aptum.bitless.be/?pcode=3920=true=
Als die niet werkt, dan zit het tussen jouw computer en overpass. Als
je dat wil troubleshooten, dan kan je best een REST client nemen.
Bv in google chrome installeer je de plugin:
Als deze het goed doet plots zijn we er nog niet uit, want er is
eigenlijk geen reden dat het op http://crab-import.osm.be/import.html
niet zou lukken. De communicatie gaat tussen client en overpass API,
waar het werk van Sander staat zou eigenlijk niet mogen uitmaken.
Ik heb zopas even wat
I just checked this with Mechelen, full monty. more than 25000 addresses
with 1000 away from being 100% complete.
It was actually very fast. Overpass query is running fine. If these kind
of queries fail, limit the streetname wildcard to a few (or 1 street)
and see if this works.
out
...
Deze werkt ook momenteel niet:
http://grb.agiv.be/geodiensten/raadpleegdiensten/GRB/wms?request=getcapabilities=wms
Mvg,
Glenn Plas
___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
Hi Louis,
I assume you are talking about the problem with street analysis,
Overpass API has been timing out since a few days when using Sander's
toolset:
Remote Address:46.4.41.83:80
Request
n a single request.
Glenn
On 03-11-15 11:50, Glenn Plas wrote:
> Hi Louis,
>
> I assume you are talking about the problem with street analysis,
> Overpass API has been timing out since a few days when using Sander's
> toolset:
>
> Remote Address:46.4.41.83:80
> Reques
Correct in fact. I've got a neighbour and only reason it's there is to
secure delivery of personal packages. Instead of leaving boxes worth
10K euro on the porch ;-)
Glenn
On 26-09-15 11:41, Marc Gemis wrote:
> thanks
>
> since it is a "personal" device there is no need to map it imho.
>
>
Mercie Sander, ook om het in te checken op github.
Mvg,
Glenn
On 07-09-15 15:05, Sander Deryckere wrote:
> Zo, ondertussen is de data geupdated, zie
> http://crab-import.osm.be/import.html?pcode=2610=true=true=
> (vergeet niet de browser volledig te refreshen indien je nog maar net de
> oude
http://www.meetup.com/DigAnt-Cafe/
This DigAnt Café meetup group aims to gather all those who want to co-create
a future proof open source city platform that unlocks various apps and
services.
Peut-être que cet événement est suffisamment intéressant pour nous d'y
aller...
Misschien is dit
On 30-07-15 13:01, Ben Laenen wrote:
On Wednesday 29 July 2015 22:31:55 Ruben Maes wrote:
Hoe worden uitgezonderd bla bla bla-onderborden getagd? Ik heb er eentje
traffic_sign=BE:C3,uitgezonderd bus en taxi, laden en lossen
Officieel volgens wiki op deze idiote manier waarvan je er een paar
Ja klopt hoor, ik had het te snel van buiten getypt. punt komma is
correct. 4 dagen ziek geweest :(
Tx om het op te merken.
Glenn
On 30-07-15 18:30, Ruben Maes wrote:
Op 30 juli 2015 17:27 schreef Glenn Plas gl...@byte-consult.be
mailto:gl...@byte-consult.be:
On 30-07-15 13:01, Ben Laenen
Zucht. komma dus. Schrijf ik het 2 keer fout. Daarom om wat meerwaarde
aan deze post te geven, er is in februari ook nog gesproken over de JOSM
road sign plugin.
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/2015-February/thread.html#6887
Glenn
On 30-07-15 18:55, Glenn Plas wrote:
Ja
I have a few powerfull servers doing nothing, in case you do want. We
can easily use githooks so the site gets updated from commiting to the
master repository. The offer stands for unlimited time btw. No need
to decide now.
Is there a todo list outside the general items on this list ? a top
Hi Nicolas,
I tend to aggree, I've not had a lot of spare time lately to spend on
OSM personally. But I'm sure I can commit in working on this for the
next year. Give ourselves specific goals and reach them by then. I
think I can also network a lot better in order to get funding /
Dat komt dus niet goed, er staan meestal nog niet eens huizen op die
plaatsen, dus huisnummers wil echt wel zeggen: eerst huizen tekenen, het
invullen van de nummers is dan pas kinderspel in 80% van de gevallen.
En al de fouten, de (postcode) grensproblemen die zo bovenkomen, het
gaat misschien
Hi,
Yesterday I have given a basic JOSM course to VGC - (Vlaamse
Gemeenschapscommissie) people who never even added a single node. I
managed to not bore them with talks about nodes/ways/relations. So in
case your governmental organisation needs a governmental reference, they
can always refer
Der is zoveel verkeerd met de boodschap op hun site in 1 zin:
U kunt uw route ook altijd plannen via Google Maps
In de vorige eeuw hadden ze ook al zoiets als een URL uitgevonden waarop
je kon klikken. De goede oude tijd van hyperlinks. Toen proprietaire
oplossingen nog 'IN' waren.
On
101 - 200 of 560 matches
Mail list logo
