Re: [OSM-talk] GPS Watch

ver, > at least for the antenna, thus I wonder why there are so many GNSS > watches, and no GNSS hats? Because it is fairly difficult to look at the top of your head? :-) Simon > > tom > > > ___ > talk mailing list > talk@openstree

Re: [OSM-talk] OSM tagging validation lib

be more helpful and perhaps allow the generation of at least rudimentary presets directly from the wiki (potentially with support from taginfo). Simon On 24.12.2017 12:54, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > > conform validation to wiki > > Sometimes wiki is wrong and should be changed.  &

Re: [OSM-talk] Questions about levels and fractional levels as well as how to handle them.

of an allowance for directly using the level numbering in non straight forward cases with non_existent_levels. I would suggest moving the discussion to the tagging list or better the indoor forum (https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=67). Simon Am 21.12.2017 um 17:21 schrieb John Karr: > >

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Challenge ? Si on dégommait du rose ?

é sont très mal positionnés (souvent pas du bon côté de la route), et même pas mal de maisons. Les villages manquent aussi de nombreuses rues. > Le 18 décembre 2017 à 15:22, Gaël Simon <gael.simon...@gmail.com> a écrit : > Bonjour à tous, > La poche de résistance de Corse a disparu (

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Challenge ? Si on dégommait du rose ?

Bonjour à tous, La poche de résistance de Corse a disparu (sans aucune connation politique bien entendu). Gaël Le 18 déc. 2017 à 00:47, Donat ROBAUX a écrit : Salut à tous, Au moment de faire ce mail, le nombre de carrés INSEE est tombé à 533. Bref avec un peu d'aide on

Re: [OSM-talk] Support OSM communities and disaster response this holiday season (by 31 Dec)

). Simon Am 16.12.2017 um 17:52 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: > 2017-12-16 17:04 GMT+01:00 Eugene Alvin Villar <sea...@gmail.com > <mailto:sea...@gmail.com>>: > > > And surely saying that the decision-making process is "completely > intransparent" is just

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] highway=path + bicycle=yes

Le 15 décembre 2017 à 16:48, marc marc a écrit : > > Regarde l'historique de l'un ou l'autre chemin qui a ce tag et pose la > question à ceux qui les ajoutent. Mais je crains que tu soies déçu du > manque de cohérence des réponses. > Pour ma part, je pense qu'il y a un

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] highway=path + bicycle=yes

d'identifier tous les cas. Le 15 décembre 2017 à 15:18, sly (sylvain letuffe) <lis...@letuffe.org> a écrit : > Marc a dit correctement ce que sont les règles actuelles du tagging : > bicycle=yes c'est une autorisation. > > > Simon Réau wrote > > Je me pose la question

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] highway=path + bicycle=yes

s praticable. Le problème c'est que je ne > vois presque jamais cette clé utilisée... > > > > On 15/12/2017 12:34, Axelos wrote: > >> Le 15/12/2017 à 12:08, Simon Réau a écrit : >> >>> De nombreux sentier et chemin en forêt sont tagué avec highway=path + >&

[OSM-talk-fr] highway=path + bicycle=yes

=yes. Cela vous semble t'il correcte ? Cordialement Simon ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

Re: [OSM-talk] Street names QA

The server crashed this morning, but is back now. Unluckily it seems as if the new machine is not quite as stable as its predecessor. Simon On 13.12.2017 17:59, Javier Sánchez Portero wrote: > Hello > > I can't access to qa.poole.ch <http://qa.poole.ch> [1]. Is temporary > do

Re: [Talk-de] Der FOSSGIS e.V. ist jetzt OSMF Local Chapter

Die SOSM gratuliert der FOSSGIS natürlich auch, und freuen uns darauf auch in Zukunft mit euch zusammenzuarbeiten. Simon Am 12.12.2017 um 09:29 schrieb Frederik Ramm: > Hallo, > > (Achtung Crosspost in zwei Listen, ggf. bei Reply anpassen) > > Der OSMF-Vorstand hat am 4.12. di

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Différencier aménagement cyclables sur trottoir des autres

lk + segegated=yes/no Par contre il est parfois difficile de différencier si c'est un aménagement sur trottoirs ou un aménagement séparé. Simon Le 12 décembre 2017 à 10:07, Benoit Fournier <ben.fourn...@gmail.com> a écrit : > Bonjour, > > Sur la page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Permission letter template

it is not found), but you need to piece together the relevant bits. Simon Am 10.12.2017 um 19:10 schrieb Javier Sánchez Portero: > So sorry about the forgotten subject. > > 2017-12-10 16:57 GMT+00:00 Javier Sánchez Portero > <javiers...@gmail.com <mailto:javiers...@gmail.co

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] OSM data - Legal question about license agreement

, the thing to understand is that OSM data always needs to distributed on ODbL terms except if we are considering insubstantial extracts. Simon Am 04.12.2017 um 04:00 schrieb Mike Razis: > > Hi, > > > My name is Mike and I have a legal question with regards to the usage > of O

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Challenge ? Si on dégommait du rose ?

C’est bien l´amour ( au sens large) qui fait tourner le monde ! Gaël Le 3 déc. 2017 à 18:55, Christian Quest a écrit : > Le 3 décembre 2017 à 18:41, Donat ROBAUX a écrit : > En effet, ca a bien chuté! Ca tombe bien parce que c'était ce genre de >

Re: [Talk-us] Willoughby, Ohio

the people living there. And yes both the DWG and the LWG regularly receive a small number of complaints of a similar nature, so it is nothing particularly special outside of the missing data. Simon Am 03.12.2017 um 18:22 schrieb Ian Dees: > On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 11:17 AM, Walter Nordmann <

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] wikidata cc0 <> odbl

on already existing OSM data). IANAL Simon Am 03.12.2017 um 13:48 schrieb Jo: > Time to open up a whole new fresh can of worms > > Call me werid, but I like the idea of cooperation between opendata > projects, but differences in licensing don't make this exactly easy. > > So he

[Talk-us] Willoughby, Ohio

ould do a survey or a quick mapillary/OSC run along it?  Simon signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [OSM-talk] Spam/Report user

I suspect he was just being nice and overcommitting in the process . (as you can see that was a long time back). My edit was based on asking the admins when I made the change (current and not dreamt up). Am 27.11.2017 um 00:13 schrieb Matthijs Melissen: > On 26 November 2017 at 20:26, Si

Re: [OSM-talk] Spam/Report user

mments of changesets. > > On 2017년 11월 26일 21:30, Simon Poole wrote: >> See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spam >> >> >> Am 26.11.2017 um 21:00 schrieb Max: >>> Oh, and where is the page to report/block/ban spammers in the wiki >>> (not OSM

Re: [OSM-talk] Spam/Report user

; On 2017년 11월 26일 20:26, Simon Poole wrote: >> Exactly the other way around: people love to create wiki pages and put >> some outlandish claims on them that have nothing to do with reality, >> leading to people that actually believe the nonsense to be frustrated >>

Re: [OSM-talk] Spam/Report user

Exactly the other way around: people love to create wiki pages and put some outlandish claims on them that have nothing to do with reality, leading to people that actually believe the nonsense to be frustrated (in this case people believing that the page in question was set up and is read by the

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Challenge ? Si on dégommait du rose ?

Bonsoir, euh, quel est le rapport avec les routes ? Une erreur d’aiguillage je pense Gaël Le 24 nov. 2017 à 23:04, Philippe Verdy a écrit : Concernant les communes nouvelles (et les anciennes communes en fusion-association), elles ont pratiquement toujours un nouveau nom

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Challenge ? Si on dégommait du rose ?

Le rose c’était le mois dernier, mais bonne idée, beau défi. C’est ce que j’aime dans OSM, la découverte de tout ce « patrimoine ». Merci Christian Gaël Le 24 nov. 2017 à 20:23, Christian Quest a écrit : J'ai repris le dégommage de carreaux INSEE sans route à

Re: [Talk-GB] Geospatial Commission

exotic in any case so typically not seen as a competitive danger. Simon Am 24.11.2017 um 12:22 schrieb Andy Robinson: > > Indeed Bob’s may be the best case scenario and I note perhaps the more > cynical view taken by the likes of Ed Parkes. > >   > > I let out a little wee in

Re: [Talk-GB] Geospatial Commission

fied to opening up some use to SMEs. Simon PS: I believe one of the open questions is if it is actually £80m more spending on OS than the what I believe current £40m, or if that is the total. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ T

Re: [OSM-talk] How to map alleys in African cities?

rly a call that the local contributors should make. Simon signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] (sans objet)

J'ai ajouté le tag fixme, nous allons essayer de faire les corrections le plus rapidement possible Simon de Géovélo Le 14 novembre 2017 à 15:43, marc marc <marc_marc_...@hotmail.com> a écrit : > Bonjour Simon, > > Le 14. 11. 17 à 14:50, Simon Réau a écrit : > > Il a

[OSM-talk-fr] (sans objet)

Bonjour, Je me présente rapidement, Simon le contributeur embauché par Géovélo (compte pro https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/simon_geovelo compte perso https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/monsieur%20a ) Nous avons un client qui à voulu entrer dans OpenStreetMap des points d’intérêts, sans

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] OpenStreetMap expliqué en breton à Brest en communs

sont prises en compte en fin de développement, en général le dernier week-end de chaque mois. A+ Vincent > Le 12 novembre 2017 à 11:59, marc marc <marc_marc_...@hotmail.com> a écrit : > > Bonjour, > >> Le 12. 11. 17 à 11:36, Gaël Simon a écrit : >> y a-t-il quelqu

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] OpenStreetMap expliqué en breton à Brest en communs

Bonjour, y a-t-il quelque part un guide de la traduction JOSM pour débutants ? Gaël Le 10 nov. 2017 à 20:06, Vincent Privat a écrit : Je note l'absence de JOSM dans les "logiciels en breton". S'il y a des motivé(e)s pour le traduire, c'est par ici:

Re: [Talk-de] Bemerkenswerte Relation

Am 10.11.2017 um 17:58 schrieb Tom Pfeifer: > On 10.11.2017 17:51, Simon Poole wrote: >> Am 10.11.2017 um 17:34 schrieb Tom Pfeifer: >>> Die Rollen "level_N" sind seit dem 14 March 2015 in type=building >>> dokumentiert [3] >>> >> Das war zu de

Re: [Talk-de] Bemerkenswerte Relation

Am 10.11.2017 um 17:34 schrieb Tom Pfeifer: > > > Die Rollen "level_N" sind seit dem 14 March 2015 in type=building > dokumentiert [3] > Das war zu dem Zeitpunkt schon veraltet und wenn ich nicht wüsste wer es da reingeschrieben hat, würde ich mich wundern. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP

Re: [Talk-de] Bemerkenswerte Relation

Relationen umging (neben diversen anderen Problemen).  Simon Am 10.11.2017 um 16:55 schrieb Sven Anders: > Moin > > > Am 2017-11-10 16:35, schrieb dktue: >> Hallo, >> >> ich bin gerade auf diese bemerkenswerte Relation [1] gestoßen. Hier >> scheint mir einiges

Re: [Talk-us] Potential vandalism or very misguided edits near Madison

ood reason/explanation for those > deletions. Looks like a clear case for a revert. I'm not confident > enough in my revert abilities, though. >  Harald, Madison (WI) > > On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 2:09 PM Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch > <mailto:si...@poole.ch>> wrote: >

[Talk-us] Potential vandalism or very misguided edits near Madison

See at least the last 5 or so changesets here https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/JuggernautMapper/history Walter has already commented on one of the changesets but maybe somebody local should have a look at the edits and potentially revert. Simon signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital

Re: [OSM-talk] CC0 in UK, CC0 in USA, sui generis database right and Wikidata

eed to vet the provenance of the data (because it is obviously from a large variety of non-declared sources) and that is a non-starter. Simon Am 05.11.2017 um 20:36 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny: > On Sun, 5 Nov 2017 10:28:29 -0800 > Mark Wagner <mark+...@carnildo.com> wrote: > >> Not an iss

Re: [OSM-talk] CC0 in UK, CC0 in USA, sui generis database right and Wikidata

Am 05.11.2017 um 19:28 schrieb Mark Wagner: > > Not an issue. The CC0 license explicitly calls out database rights as > being released to the greatest extent possible. From the text of the > license (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode) > Yes, if it is the rights holder

Re: [OSM-talk] New OSM Quick-Fix service

arly shows that such changes should stay just in the former Eastern Block countries if not even cover less territory. Simon signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] osm13 ne répond(ait) plus...

Merci Christian pour ta disponibilité Gaël Le 30 oct. 2017 à 22:38, Christian Quest a écrit : Je lui ait demandé, mais ce coquin ne veut pas répondre ! Plus sérieusement, munin montre qu'il y a eu un pic sur la latence, puis plus rien, kernel HS, machine bloquée.

Re: [OSM-talk] weeklyOSM #379 2017-10-17-2017-10-23

are appropriate, it is clear that if something doesn't change the net result will be a perma-ban which has been pointed out to him multiple times and will not come as a surprise . Simon Am 28.10.2017 um 15:53 schrieb Blake Girardot: > Greetings, > > As someone who has worked with Verdy P on a daily b

Re: [OSM-talk] Misrepresentation of OSM by HOT?

ool to support mapping of disaster areas in OpenStreetMap" would for example be OK (a bit long but just to get the point across). Simon > 2) Link the word "OpenStreetmap"  to the OSM web site > > Regards > David > > -- Original Message -- > From: &qu

Re: [OSM-talk] Misrepresentation of OSM by HOT?

be a could occasion to follow http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Trademark_Policy#2._How_to_use_the_OSM_marks Thanks Simon Am 23.10.2017 um 11:37 schrieb Blake Girardot HOT/OSM: > Hi Christoph, > > We can not win if we do or if we do not :) > > It clearly says the HOT Tasking

Re: [OSM-talk] New OSM Quick-Fix service

equivalent to a mechanical edit. Simon On 13.10.2017 23:25, Yuri Astrakhan wrote: > I would like to introduce a new quick-fix editing service. It allows > users to generate a list of editing suggestions using a query, review > each suggestion one by one, and click "Save" on eac

Re: [OSM-talk] Scientific paper on "Information Seeding"

r of contributors and they could well be longer term contributor too. IIRC there is at least one paper co-authored by Pascal that has numbers on this, maybe it is worth the effort to dig that out again. That said there are obviously other mechanisms that could produce the measured effect. Simo

Re: [talk-au] Qld topo map usable?

material. Simon Am 01.10.2017 um 08:24 schrieb Andrew Harvey: > I made an enquiry to DNRM about this exactly back in June. > > The response I got was: > > We have given consideration to your request and advise that, > consistent with Queensland Government policy, our data is provid

Re: [OSM-talk] Signup page: Public Doman "what-this?" button broken

As has been pointed out many times the whole thing is meaningless for a multitude of reasons and simply should be removed (checkbox and text). Simon Am 08.10.2017 um 11:54 schrieb Sebastian Kürten: > Hi, > > During sign up for an OSM account, the user is presented with the > Contr

Re: [OSM-talk] A thought on bot edits

I would suggest simply adapting my old suggestion (for imports) that as long as you fix the same number of elements from a broken import you can bot edit/import to your hearts desire. Totally serious :-) Simon On 2. Oktober 2017 16:58:02 MESZ, Christoph Hormann <o...@imagico.de>

Re: [OSM-talk] Overlapping brands (was "Fixing wiki* -> brand:wiki*")

ct isn't wrong. And yes that probably means that the person querying for "Wendy's" needs to know that he has to exclude NL, who else? Simon PS: particularly brand:wikipedia is rather low use and mainly points to McDonald's  > regards > > m > > [1] > https://ww

Re: [OSM-talk] Fixing wiki* -> brand:wiki*

or additional information that is already  that is already quite adequately provided by the brand key.   Simon signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Fixing wiki* -> brand:wiki*

Am 27.09.2017 um 13:30 schrieb Andy Mabbett: > > For example, until the UK version went titsup a few years back, there > were chains of stores in the UK and in Australia, each called > "Woolworths". Though they had common roots, they were not the same. > > Why would that matter to OSM? Given

Re: [OSM-talk] Fixing wiki* -> brand:wiki*

table. Simon Note I'm talking about the usefulness for OSM here, that it would be useful for WD is clear. Am 27.09.2017 um 00:47 schrieb Yuri Astrakhan: > Here is a query that finds all wikidata IDs frequently used in > "brand:wikidata", and shows OSM objects whose &

Re: [Talk-GB] OpenStreetCam or Mapillary?

While we would probably all love to be able to our hands on some Hollywood magic (I just have s many photos that are just a tiny bit too blurry to decipher  :-)) I suspect Marc was referring to reverting back to the original non-blurred images, removing blurs added for privacy reasons, Simon

Re: [Talk-GB] OpenStreetCam or Mapillary?

they do tend to not be open to the general public for privacy reasons and so on, but getting our hands on that kind of material would be great. Naturally these kind of things tend to be "slightly" more expensive than using a smart phone camera. Simon Am 21.09.2017 um 20:09 schrieb Brian Pra

Re: [OSM-talk] WhatOSM, a guide for contribution tools

that on more general principles they are not a good idea. Simon On 21.09.2017 19:53, James wrote: > You might want to reconsider the name as you started this project 2 > weeks ago and XYZosm or osmXYZ or OpenXYZMap are "copyrighted" and > goes against the new usage policy. >

Re: [OSM-talk] Adding wikidata tags to the remaining objects with only wikipedia tag

ributors time) with many other players. Now OSM proper has been loosing out big time on the first point as of late, but luckily hasn't had great requirements on the 2nd (that is why we are still around), but even OSM is not so daft to want a situation in which it actively has to redirect potential

Re: [OSM-talk] Adding wikidata tags to the remaining objects with only wikipedia tag

> like your USB analogy :) About names - you will be surprised to > discover that MB and other places are actively pursuing Wikidata > integration because WD tends to have a huge names list, possibly > bigger than OSM itself? > > That is nice for MB, but proble

Re: [OSM-talk] Adding wikidata tags to the remaining objects with only wikipedia tag

as otherwise it requires a data consumer to use wikidata to get a useful reference to wikipedia (see for example the use in Nominatim as Sarah has pointed out). Naturally from a pure CS pov that is naturally unnecessary redundancy, but we have that all over the place. Simon > > I noticed du

Re: [OSM-talk] Adding wikidata tags to the remaining objects with only wikipedia tag

use of wikidata in lieu of OSM place names). It would further be very naive to not see the competitive angle of what is happening here. On the other hand lots of the wikidata related additions would seem to be fairly neutral (WD references additionally to WP links and so on).  Simon Am 20.09.2017

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Rennes : cartographie du Musée de Bretagne

Bravo pour cette belle initiative et ces résultats ! Gaël Le 19 sept. 2017 à 10:21, gwen...@niadomo.net a écrit : bonjour À l'occasion des Journées européenne du patrimoine, le groupe des contributeurs d'Ille et Vilaine a entamé la cartographie intérieure du Musée de Bretagne à Rennes. Cette

Re: [OSM-talk] Draft Trademark Policy

Am 18.09.2017 um 11:47 schrieb Stephan Knauss: > Hello Simon, > > On 18.09.2017 10:17, Simon Poole wrote: >> Depending on the territory you can have rights in marks that you have >> not registered and it is probably completely undisputed that OSM is >> associated a

Re: [OSM-talk] Draft Trademark Policy

is. Just ask Richard about OsmAnd. Simon PS: there is a list on the wiki of our successfully registered trademarks that we keep reasonably up to date. Am 18.09.2017 um 09:12 schrieb Stephan Knauss: > Hello Simon, > > On 08.09.2017 20:02, Simon Poole wrote: >> Further we've added

Re: [OSM-talk] Name challenge - what to call the new OSM+Wikidata service?

such use legit for the first time. And yes: WoQ would be a wonderful name for Yuris service and shows that it is completely possible to break out of the old schema of simply copying OSM. Simon Am 17.09.2017 um 15:57 schrieb Yves: > So, no OpenSparqlMap, then? :( > Sad, this policy definitely

Re: [OSM-talk] Transferring OSMTracker for Android development to the OpenStreetMap organization

thinking about the consequences of publishing apps as OSM /OSMF but it is naturally not impossible. Simon Am 17.09.2017 um 21:32 schrieb Nicolas Guillaumin: > Hi, > > I'm the author of the OSMTracker for Android application: > https://github.com/nguillaumin/osmtracker-and

Re: [talk-au] MapRoulette Challenge for invalid phone numbers in Victoria.

phone/fax numbers in Victoria, Australia" and there are about > 94 items requiring checking. Should the phone numbers be on a node? Some are on buildings or areas. With MapRoulette, can all points be shown on the map at once, or is cycling through them with Skip the only option? -- Regards

Re: [OSM-talk] Draft Trademark Policy

in domain names and that use of the OpenStreetMap mark soley for attribution does not require a trademark notice. This should cover the three major points raised. You can find the wikified version of the updated document here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Trademark_Policy Simon

Re: [talk-au] Phone numbers

one:FR=0 800 123 456 for standard toll free call only from France where the amenity is (note that there's NO "+" sign, it is NOT in international format), ... so they could be included. -- Regards Simon Slater Registered Linux User #463789 @ h

Re: [talk-au] Phone numbers

On Thursday, 7 September 2017 7:57:26 AM AEST Warin wrote: > I have not come up wit a way to search for '+' > as that is a registered character. Can you escape with a \ ? ie phone!="^\+61 8 " -- Regards Simon Slater Registered Linux User #463789 @ http://

Re: [OSM-talk] An import in New Zealand, assistance requested

Am 31.08.2017 um 20:56 schrieb Éric Gillet: > 2017-08-31 16:55 GMT+02:00 Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch > <mailto:si...@poole.ch>>: > > Sorry for responding to this late. > > Just because a specific source has been legally "OK"ed doesn't imply &

Re: [OSM-talk] An import in New Zealand, assistance requested

ore people have mapped in NZ than when the import started. As the complaint at hand nicely illustrates, maybe going back and checking what the community thinks is appropriate now would be a good idea, instead of trudging along on a course set by 100 people many years back.  Simon Am 18.08.201

[OSM-talk] Geocoding guideline

, debated issue and will make it easier to use OSM data in more applications. Thanks to all that worked on the text and provided feedback negative and positive. Simon signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ talk mailing list talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

Am 28.08.2017 um 14:43 schrieb Pierre Béland: > Simon Poole wrote > > PS: naturally simply assuming that all name expansions are > legit is a bit iffy, consider Circle vs. Circuit  and other > expansions that you often can't decide without external >

Re: [OSM-talk] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

in, but I do want to point out that in for the majority of the US the names will revert back to their original TIGER values. For example for the street Clifford pointed to, from Seeton Road to East Seeton Road, which is no worse than before somebody decided to start cheating and not a major disaste

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

know that Brazil has already had multiple such issues in the past, is Wille Marcel on this list? Simon * the redaction a couple of weeks back in Switzerland removed roughly 10% of the names from "residential" streets to but the US and Canadian numbers in to perspective and there is

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Camping fermé : supprimer? ajouter tag?

Bonjour, disused:tourism=camp_site Gaël Le 19 août 2017 à 21:05, Shohreh a écrit : Quel tag? -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Camping-ferme-supprimer-ajouter-tag-tp5900976p5900979.html Sent from the France mailing list archive at

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Talk-ie Digest, Vol 99, Issue 7

as have been aired by the UK chapter). It would be nice if I was proved wrong, but I don't believe that active recruitment really works (fsov of works). Simon PS: the mailing list is still refusing to accept signed mails. ___ Talk-ie mailing list Talk-ie

Re: [Talk-us] anyone know what software is generating these Q/A Notes?

We've been having issues on and off for a while now (now and then with a lot longer delays than 2 hours), as I understand from Tom this is due to a large number of bogus spammy subscription requests. Simon On 12 August 2017 02:03:03 CEST, Rihards <ric...@nakts.net> wrote: >On 2017.08.

Re: [OSM-talk] European Data Portal declares the CC-BY 4.0 and ODbL 1.0 compatible

I've got a response from the the EDP and they agree that labelling the licences in question as "compatible" could be misleading, they have indicated that they will change the wording going forward. Simon Am 03.08.2017 um 22:50 schrieb Simon Poole: > > Currently outgoing mail

Re: [OSM-talk] Draft Trademark Policy

ferently we would have. Nobody denies that the word play can be fun, but you point out the issues yourself, it extends beyond the community and it doesn't jibe with trademark law in the real world. Simon signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature __

Re: [OSM-talk] Draft Trademark Policy

ing yet another OSM mark remix isn't contributing to anything, really. Simon signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Draft Trademark Policy

inished. We haven't discussed this in the LWG though. As you can see from the text we've tried to pre-approve the typical community activities, Jochen and Christoph have pointed to the software development related issues that we will address in one way or the other so there will be

Re: [OSM-talk] Draft Trademark Policy

have the naming issues and just as with the domain names, the -actual- number of things we need to look at is small and I'm sure we'll find workable solutions for them. Simon signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [OSM-talk] Draft Trademark Policy

Am 05.08.2017 um 09:15 schrieb Jochen Topf: > On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 07:07:47PM +0200, Simon Poole wrote: >> Sorry but that is hyperbole, after the 13 years of OSM the number of >> domains affected amounts to something between 30 and 40., not 100s. The >> policy is

Re: [OSM-talk] Draft Trademark Policy

SM related activity takes place on the Internet and domain names are essentially ersatz-trademarks I can't see excluding them from the policy as being sensible. Sorry. Simon On 04.08.2017 20:00, Christoph Hormann wrote: > Simon, if you immediately dismiss or ridicule any critical

Re: [OSM-talk] Draft Trademark Policy

ery clear that this would inevitably lead > to the names "OpenStreetMap" and "OSM" and similar/composite terms > being used much less even in fairly strictly OSM related projects that > the OSMF would probably have no problem with using the name. >

Re: [OSM-talk] Draft Trademark Policy

On 04.08.2017 18:07, Jochen Topf wrote: > On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 04:37:23PM +0200, Simon Poole wrote: > >> Yes and this is one of the big sore points, but we are not asking most >> of them to change there name, just to get licensed/permission in some >> form.

Re: [OSM-talk] Draft Trademark Policy

Am 04.08.2017 um 15:12 schrieb Jochen Topf: > On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 11:07:44PM +0200, Simon Poole wrote: >> The LWG would like to start a period of public review and consultation >> on our draft trademark policy, that we intend to bring forward to the >> OSMF board for

Re: [OSM-talk] Draft Trademark Policy

e user groups (the local chapter process, and perhaps one day a local user group structure are designed to deal with that), which are difficult to undo, but that is not a reason to make things worse. Simon signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature __

Re: [OSM-talk] Draft Trademark Policy

Am 04.08.2017 um 13:53 schrieb Matthijs Melissen: > On 3 August 2017 at 23:07, Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch> wrote: >> The LWG would like to start a period of public review and consultation on >> our draft trademark policy, that we intend to bring forward to the OSMF

Re: [OSM-talk] Draft Trademark Policy

n to > understand what it is. I don't really think some thing like: */GeoFabrik Awesone WMS Services/*/ // //100% guaranteed wholesome OpenStreetMap(TM) data served hot from replication./ Really counts as "an extra indirection" Simon signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digita

Re: [OSM-talk] Draft Trademark Policy

ssion. A personal note: one of my pet peeves are the awful unimaginative, uncreative and descriptive product and service names used in OSM-space, while I can just barely live with community projects not doing better, you are not going to find me making excuses for commercial en

Re: [OSM-talk] Draft Trademark Policy

* OSGeo http://www.osgeo.org/trademark_guidelines * Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/foundation/trademarks/policy/ Simon signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https

Re: [OSM-talk] Draft Trademark Policy

Am 04.08.2017 um 11:39 schrieb Christoph Hormann: > On Thursday 03 August 2017, Simon Poole wrote: >> Dear all >> >> The LWG would like to start a period of public review and >> consultation on our draft trademark policy, that we intend to bring >> forwa

[OSM-talk] Draft Trademark Policy

to outlaw clear misuse which is in the interest of the whole OSM community. Simon signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] European Data Portal declares the CC-BY 4.0 and ODbL 1.0 compatible

, but with a large number of the licenses listed as compatible on that page. Simon Am 03.08.2017 um 15:16 schrieb Simon Poole: > Hi Maurizio > > Thank you for the pointer. > > I believe the error is really that they overlooked some of the finer > points of the CC licences, but I'll see

Re: [OSM-talk] Opportunity for Open Mapping in Uganda

. Simon Am 01.08.2017 um 23:18 schrieb Vivien Deparday: > Hi everyone, > (apologies for cross-posting) > > As part of the Open Data for Resilience Initiative (OpenDRI) > (www.opendri.org <http://www.opendri.org>), we just recently published > an opportunity for

Re: [OSM-talk] European Data Portal declares the CC-BY 4.0 and ODbL 1.0 compatible

Hi Maurizio Thank you for the pointer. I believe the error is really that they overlooked some of the finer points of the CC licences, but I'll see if it is possible to discuss this with them. Simon Am 03.08.2017 um 10:35 schrieb Maurizio Napolitano: > I discovered today a service m

Re: [Talk-us] [OSM-talk] Sourcing Open Aerial Imagery

Am 27.07.2017 um 16:23 schrieb Bryan Housel: > TODO: We don’t have a template letter, or clear guidelines on which > imagery licenses are compatible with our use, and we should. > See https://github.com/osmlab/editor-layer-index/issues/166 . Like > you said in your other email, tracing is

Re: [Talk-GB] [Osmf-talk] Live OSM discussion in ~45 minutes (7.30pm UK time)

them instead of hijacking a thread with a different topic, but they seem to be strangely absent Simon On 27.07.2017 14:41, Mikel Maron wrote: > Takeaways > * Everyone understands gender diversity is a problem > * Some of us think it's very important to address, others think other > iss

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >