FW If you open this file in an editor it looks like your complete
FW addressbook ;-)
FW Did you try the method File/Export to/Export selection to export
FW a single entry?
That is exactly what i did! I only wanted to export 1 entry - and for
some reason ALL are put into the VCF and it seems
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Is it just me or is anyone else noticing an increase in the amount of
spam that's fooling BayesIt?
- --
Stuart Hemming
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
Aided by BayesIt! 0.7.5, MyGate (v1.0) and rss2pop3 (v1.2).
Stuart,
On 16-12-2004 12:24, you [SH] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
SH Looking at some of the stuff I've been getting it's little wonder
SH that BayesIt is failing to catch it. Some of the messages contain
SH nothing that I might not expect to find in a regular message, little
SH jokes,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
PF Effective spam filtering needs more strings to play on
[snip]
Thanks, I'll try and follow that up between Christmas and New Year
whilst it's quiet in the office.
- --
Stuart Hemming
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service
Stuart,
On 16-12-2004 12:46, you [SH] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
PF (SpamPal plugin home
PF http://www.agentintelligent.com/P2Pplugin.html).
SH The site seems to be down.
Not from here.
--
greeting Best regards /greeting
author Peter Fjelsten /author
thebat version 3.0.1.33 Pro /thebat
Stuart,
On 16-12-2004 12:43, you [SH] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
SH Thanks, I'll try and follow that up between Christmas and New Year
SH whilst it's quiet in the office.
I might have been unclear:
* BayesIt has Bayesian
* Bayes Filter has Bayesian and public blacklists
* SpamPal (with
Hello Stuart!
On Thursday, December 16, 2004 at 12:24:11 PM you wrote:
Looking at some of the stuff I've been getting it's little wonder that
BayesIt is failing to catch it.
I tried it when you first asked by before sending the message I was
successful in stalling my machine completely ...
Hello Stuart,
Thursday, December 16, 2004, 12:24:11 PM, you wrote:
Looking at some of the stuff I've been getting it's little wonder that
BayesIt is failing to catch it. Some of the messages contain nothing
that I might not expect to find in a regular message, little jokes,
quotations from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
PF Not from here.
It's working now.
- --
Stuart Hemming
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
Aided by BayesIt! 0.7.5, MyGate (v1.0) and rss2pop3 (v1.2).
PGP Key available from ldap://keyserver.pgp.com
Anything worth
Hello Maxim,
Thursday, December 16, 2004, 3:02:23 AM, you wrote:
The DBCS support of v3.02 series is bad. Do you have any plan to improve it?
Or delay it to later beta cycle?
MM Do you speak about the MicroEd editor?
No, I mean the windows editor. From v3.022 beta, the windows editor module
Stuart,
On 16-12-2004 15:14, you [SH] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
SH And I've changed it to
SH Server: 127.0.0.1
SH Username: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SH password:
SH Port: 110
SH SpamPal complains about the port (110) being in use. I've tried
I don't know about Exchange servers - but have
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 16:17:04 +0100, Michael Schneider
It's a problem with TB!'s cache. If you move a message to another
folder and don't clear the cache, the next got message will be shown
as the old you just moved. Only solution: clearing cache ...
I've experienced this problem for a while
Hello,
trying to open the Options menu after uninstalling BayesIt gives the
following AV:
--- The Bat! ---
Access violation at address 0081F051 in module 'thebat.exe'. Read of
address 1003AEA8.
--- OK
Hello everyone,
created a new (empty) IMAP account, no configuration except the absolute
minimum (as required by the new account wizard). Deleted the account again,
gives AV:
--- The Bat! ---
Access violation at address 006DE3FD in module
ASK Please, don't mind that I have my doubts that you really picked the correct
ASK option... I made exactly the same mistake yesterday evening.
ASK Select a single entry in the AB
ASK Open the File menu
ASK Select Export
ASK - do *not* select VCF now!
ASK Select Export Selection
ASK (now the
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 09:48:55 -0500, AC Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- wrong message bodies being displayed for messages actually selected.
This seems to be triggered by new messages being added to the folder as
you browse it. I'm not sure though. An awful one, that one. :/
I see you've
Hello Christian Grams everyone else,
on 16-Dez-2004 at 09:17 you (Christian Grams) wrote:
That is exactly what i did! I only wanted to export 1 entry - and for
some reason ALL are put into the VCF
Please, don't mind that I have my doubts that you really picked the correct
option... I made
Hello everyone,
I'm using the RTV; its configured to display sigs (those with a correct sig
delimiter *g*) in a different color. This works only with the standard sig
delimiter -- but not with the pgp delimiter - --.
The sig with the pgp delimiter is stripped correctly when replying, but its
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
there are two minor issues in my daily use of PGP/GPG with The Bat!,
but still I'd like them fixed:
One: I'd like The Bat! to automatically check PGP signatures, when the
message is selected. I saw this in KMail and Sylpheed, and it is
Hello Alexander,
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 at 17:32:40 +0100, (which is
16.12.2004 at 18:32:40 +2000 where I live), you wrote:
created a new (empty) IMAP account, no configuration except the absolute
minimum (as required by the new account wizard). Deleted the account again,
gives AV:
Confirmed
Hello Alexander,
Actually, none of the attributes (font, color, style) for signatures is
applied to the pgp signature delimiter delimited signature :-)
...confirmations?
confirmed here
WinXP/SP1 TB!3.02.10 + TB!v2.12.04
--
best regards
Miroslav
BAT-MAIL.DE.VU - http://bat-mail.de.vu
Hello Raymund!
On Thursday, December 16, 2004 at 8:18:36 PM you wrote:
If your hard drive is encrypted you don't have to think about stuff
like that :-)
The trouble isn't *my* HD but yours (when I send you a message) ...
--
Dierk Haasis
:Dierk: Copy 'n' Concept
The Bat 3.0.2.10 on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Henk,
on Thu, 16 Dec 2004 20:46:06 +0100GMT, you wrote:
HdB I downloaded the new GnuPG version 1.4.0 but after installingand
HdB trying to send a signed message I got the message:
HdB gpg: conversion from `utf-8' to `CP0' not available.
At
Hello Peter,
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 21:00:43 +0100GMT (16-12-2004, 21:00 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:
PM At least:
PM gpg: Signature made 12/16/04 20:30:49 Westeuropäische
PM Normalzeit using DSA key ID DBE6E678
PM gpg: Good signature from Henk M. de Bruijn
PM gpg: aka ...
PM
Hello Alexander,
...confirmations?
not confirmed under
Win98/SE + TB! v3.01.33 + TB! v3.02.10
Win2000/SP4 TB! v2.12.04 + TB! v3.01.33 + TB! v3.02.10
--
best regards
Miroslav
BAT-MAIL.DE.VU - http://bat-mail.de.vu
News-Ticker: http://thebat.orgavision.de/bat-mail.xml
Hello Raymund!
On Thursday, December 16, 2004 at 9:08:06 PM you wrote:
:-) I meant the HD of the person recieving the encrypted mail. No need
to encrypt everything twice.
You use an encrypted NTFS partition? Or a similar scheme, even PGPDisk
or similar?
Not only do I have to rely on the fact
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Henk,
on Thu, 16 Dec 2004 21:07:06 +0100GMT, you wrote:
HdB Bad sig?
Nope. :-))
gpg: Signature made 12/16/04 21:07:06 Westeuropäische Normalzeit using DSA key
ID DBE6E678
gpg: Good signature from Henk M. de Bruijn
gpg: aka ...
Hello Miroslav Florensen everyone else,
on 16-Dez-2004 at 21:20 you (Miroslav Florensen) wrote:
...confirmations?
not confirmed under
Win98/SE + TB! v3.01.33 + TB! v3.02.10
Win2000/SP4 TB! v2.12.04 + TB! v3.01.33 + TB! v3.02.10
Can you please check the two last messages from Henk de
Hello Raymund Thomas Tump everyone else,
on 16-Dez-2004 at 21:47 you (Raymund Thomas Tump) wrote:
Why? If you send your message encrypted, you can't make sure that it
stays encrypted, can you? If there is an option in TB! that you can
save decrypted messages, some will use it some not.
Some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Alexander,
on Thu, 16 Dec 2004 21:49:40 +0100GMT, you wrote:
ASK Can you please check the two last messages from Henk de Bruijn and Peter
ASK Meyns?
ASK Peters PGP-sig-delimiter is - -- (with space before CR) and its not
ASK recognized by the
Hello Alexander,
from Henk de Bruijn
good sig :)
and Peter Meyns?
bad sig :(
I tested it with different PGP-Sigs (- --), it happens only with the
messages of Peter.
WinXP/SP1 v2.12.04 + v3.02.10
--
best regards
Miroslav
BAT-MAIL.DE.VU - http://bat-mail.de.vu
News-Ticker:
Hello Raymund!
On Thursday, December 16, 2004 at 9:47:29 PM you wrote:
Yes for the first question.
With PGPDisk (and several other utilities for HD encryption) you can
see for yourself how good it works. For NTFS ...
I am far from being an MS basher but do I remember correctly that
there
Hello Peter Meyns everyone else,
on 16-Dez-2004 at 22:04 you (Peter Meyns) wrote:
ASK Peters PGP-sig-delimiter is - -- (with space before CR) and its
ASK not recognized by the RTV as signature, but recognized stripped
ASK when replying. Henks PGP-sig-delimiter is - -- (no space before
ASK
Hi TBBeta,
I am far from being an MS basher but do I remember correctly that
there might be a kind of super key with the US authorities?!
Doesn't matter I'm not working for Microsoft, so there is no super key
for the US authorities.
CDs for archiving aren't a problem :-)
You have to encrypt
Hi Henk,
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 20:56:30 +0100 (2:56 PM here), Henk de Bruijn
[HdB] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
HdB Can you let me know which settings I have to use for the Bat! to
HdB avoid conflicts with GPGrelay.
I sent and encrypted reply offlist.
--
Kevin Coates
Dewitt, NY USA
Using
Henk de Bruijn schreef:
Hello TBBETA
I downloaded the new GnuPG version 1.4.0 but after installingand
trying to send a signed message I got the message:
gpg: conversion from `utf-8' to `CP0' not available.
With Thunderbird 1.0 there is no problem:
testing nieuwe versie GnuPG Please can you solve
Hello NetVicious,
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 00:56:38 +0100 (16.12.2004 4:56 my local time),
received Thursday, December 16, 2004 at 12:31:21 +0500,
you wrote about Status Report on the Christmas Edition of The Bat,
at least in part:
N A lot of people are waiting for a GNU/Linux TB
Hello Peter!
On Thursday, December 16, 2004 at 8:07:46 PM you wrote:
I haven't had such messages yet, so this doesn't pose a problem here.
How d'you know? It could well be that one or two of my messages to you
don't pose a problem today but how about tomorrow? My usual example
starts on
At 12:54 [GMT+0100] on Thursday December 16 (actual time - 7:54pm on Thursday
in Perth, Western Australia), you wrote:
[snips]
Peter For me the by far most effective is SpamPal
Yeah, same here. I tried a couple of other solutions, but went back to SpamPal
and am very happy.
--
cheers, Mic
G'day Tbbeta,
I'm having serious difficulties with my quoting, and it's driving me mad.
I presume I've changed something, but I'm stuffed if I can figure out what it
is.
As you can see from my reply to the previous thread, (shown below), it shows
the name of the person being quoted fine, but
Hello TBBETA
I downloaded the new GnuPG version 1.4.0 but after installingand
trying to send a signed message I got the message:
gpg: conversion from `utf-8' to `CP0' not available.
With Thunderbird 1.0 there is no problem:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
testing nieuwe versie
At 23:06 [GMT+] on Thursday December 16 (actual time - 7:06am on Friday in
Perth, Western Australia), you wrote:
[snips]
MC Any ideas? I've hunted through the prefs, etc, but as we all know, it's
not as
MC intuitive as it could be
Tony At first glance I'd say it was because you had a
Hi Dierk,
If your hard drive is encrypted you don't have to think about stuff
like that :-)
The trouble isn't *my* HD but yours (when I send you a message) ...
:-) I meant the HD of the person recieving the encrypted mail. No need
to encrypt everything twice.
And normally that would be
Hello Michael,
A reminder of what Michael Schneider on TBBETA typed on:
15 December 2004 at 16:40:06 GMT +0100
MS At least most of this software doesn't cost any money
But I'm not expecting something for nothing.
MS And for email-clients: I don't any bugs in kmail. It works superb
MS here.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
MM Just keep feeding BayesIt with spam and ham continually, to keep it in good
shape :-)
Trust me I am.
Looking at some of the stuff I've been getting it's little wonder that
BayesIt is failing to catch it. Some of the messages contain nothing
that
Hello Alexander,
A reminder of what Alexander Leschinsky on TBBETA typed on:
16 December 2004 at 22:50:47 GMT +0100
AL Mahogany
Tried it... 1/10
AL Sylpheed-Claws
Tried that today... 4/10
AL Mozilla
Tried it... 1/10
AL Thunderbird
Tried it... 0/10
AL Gnus
Never tried it...
AL
Hi Dierk,
:-) I meant the HD of the person recieving the encrypted mail. No need
to encrypt everything twice.
You use an encrypted NTFS partition? Or a similar scheme, even PGPDisk
or similar?
Yes for the first question. I'm on the bright side here, I work in a
company producing such stuff
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Alexander,
on Thu, 16 Dec 2004 22:12:21 +0100GMT, you wrote:
ASK Peters PGP-sig-delimiter is - -- (with space before CR) and its
ASK not recognized by the RTV as signature, but recognized stripped
ASK when replying. Henks PGP-sig-delimiter is -
Hello Henk,
Thursday, December 16, 2004, 8:07:06 PM, you wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bad sig?
Good sig :)
Sean
--
ICQ: 679813 YAHOO: thecivvie
Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AIM: tcobone
O2 +353863868343 Vodafone +353872628431
i think i'd rather be a cat... sleep
Hello Stuart,
A reminder of what Stuart Hemming on TBBETA typed on:
15 December 2004 at 16:04:40 GMT +0100
SH Software Company Cancels Christmas!
That'll give them more time to work on the Linux port :)
--
Best regards,Tony.
Hello Mic,
A reminder of what Mic Cullen on TBBETA typed on:
16 December 2004 at 23:34:35 GMT +0100
MC Any ideas? I've hunted through the prefs, etc, but as we all know, it's not
as
MC intuitive as it could be
At first glance I'd say it was because you had a chevron before AND after his
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Dierk,
on Thu, 16 Dec 2004 19:44:41 +0100GMT, you wrote:
Two: I'd like to have an option to save decrypted messages. Encryption
is fine for transmission, but I don't need them necessarily encrypted
on my computer. It was possible up to version
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
PF Stuart,
I'm struggling to get TB to collect mail via SpamPal
In the account's transport options I've got
Server: myExchangeSvr
Username: stuarth
password:
Port: 110
And I've changed it to
Server: 127.0.0.1
Username: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
on Sat, 11 Dec 2004 20:19:48 +0100GMT, I wrote:
PM I played around with GnuPG a bit, and set up a free form primary user
PM ID (just my name, no e-mail, no comment). TB! doesn't seem to like
PM this. If I have to sign or decrypt anything,
Hello Maxim,
A reminder of what Maxim Masiutin on TBBETA typed on:
15 December 2004 at 15:52:05 GMT +0100
MM Not yet.
Not Yet isn't a No so that's a good sign.
MM I don't think so.
That's a good sign as well.
MM I'm quite interested in the list of Linux users who are all waiting for
MM a
Hello Kevin,
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 12:12:19 -0500GMT (12-12-2004, 18:12 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:
KC On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 17:37:49 +0100 (11:37 AM here), Henk de Bruijn
KC [HdB] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
KC ... Are you running any plugins with The Bat! ?
HdB No, on the new computer I
Hello Maxim,
Thursday, December 16, 2004, 1:13:58 PM, among other things, you wrote:
Is it just me or is anyone else noticing an increase in the amount of
spam that's fooling BayesIt?
No, not just you. I've wondered whether Bayesit has been working at
all lately.
MM Just keep feeding
Hello Roger,
Thursday, December 16, 2004, 9:41:38 PM, Roger Phillips wrote:
MM Just keep feeding BayesIt with spam and ham continually, to keep it in
good shape :-)
This is NOT enough Maxim.
I'd have to agree. Either bayesian filtering has gone by the wayside
because spammers have gotten
Hello Sean,
Thursday, December 16, 2004, 4:45:15 PM, Sean Rima wrote:
It is a pity that all my good sigs come from Thunderbird and not from
the Bat! :-(
This one is good and I belive it came via TB!
Where did you download GnuPG 1.4.0? I looked for it the other day, and I
think they were up
-BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.30
owGtkrFu01AUhkMLDFY9FF7g79QiEsd2myJZJYiqKAmoJWqCChISuk5O4kttX+N7
0+AFiY0RiamCAYSAia1SB8TCA/QF6NyJhQdA4jgVb8Dd7j33/85/fp3X9nxlbvHK
5bdvfp6dPb/wde5juPBinI1NLgpnEGe3f4RX2xTHCj0SadW2bOt+in40qcJbxxYN
Hello TB Lists,
Just thought I'd let those of you who use counters in your subject with
a reply (i.e. Re[2]: GnuPG 1.4.0) that it messes up the threading in my
newsreader (i.e. Agent 1.93) when I pull from Gmane. Not that you really
care about my newsreader because I do NOT.
I figure you may
Hello AC,
A reminder of what AC Martin on TBBETA typed on:
15 December 2004 at 18:30:17 GMT +0100
AM ... and how does that chart help with knowing how many Linux users are
AM waiting for and are willing to pay for a TB! port when it comes?
I didn't actually say The Bat! What I said was A
Hello Michael,
A reminder of what Michael Schneider on TBBETA typed on:
15 December 2004 at 15:55:36 GMT +0100
MS On the other hand, kmail works pretty well and tb! for linux would have a
bad
MS start because linux-users only like *working* software and hate being
MS charged for buxfixing
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 05:35:40 +0100GMT (17-12-2004, 5:35 +0100, where I
live), I wrote:
HdB -BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-
HdB Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.30
HdB -END PGP MESSAGE-
Sorry, I tried to sign a message with GPGshell but it did not sign but
encrypted the message
Below are the headers from one of some problematic messages. As you can see
in the
attached image, the creation time seems to be on year 2000. But as you can see
in the headers the dates are all on 2004.
On the other hand the format of the date on Date: field is Date: Tue Nov 30
01:44:00 CST
Hello Greg,
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 22:19:39 -0600GMT (17-12-2004, 5:19 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
...snip
Where did you download GnuPG 1.4.0? I looked for it the other day, and I
think they were up to release candidate for 1.4.0. I haven't seen any
notice on the release of GnuPG 1.4.0
Hello Martin,
A reminder of what Martin Schoch on TBBETA typed on:
15 December 2004 at 16:08:48 GMT +0100
MS You can add me to this list, please.
Add yourself to the wish list, it's getting quite long now.
--
Best regards,Tony.
Hi Tony Boom,
On 15/12/2004 3:16 PM, you wrote:
I didn't actually say The Bat! What I said was A decent email client.
Well, of those Linux users you showed us the chart, there is a
percentage who wish for a decent e-mail client. I'm sure there are many
who are happy with what exists and
Hello Tony,
Thursday, December 16, 2004, 7:20:09 PM, you wrote:
AL Mozilla
TB Tried it... 1/10
AL Thunderbird
TB Tried it... 0/10
Looking at the points above, where does PINE falls?
--
Best regards, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Diego
Hello Peter,
Thursday, December 16, 2004, 4:07:46 PM, you wrote:
PM I haven't had such messages yet, so this doesn't pose a problem here.
PM I'd move such messages to an encrypted container anyway if there were
PM such... ;-)
But it wouldn´t be too much to save an pgp encrypted message to an
Hello Dierk,
Thursday, December 16, 2004, 5:21:32 PM, you wrote:
DH How d'you know? It could well be that one or two of my messages to you
DH don't pose a problem today but how about tomorrow? My usual example
DH starts on January 29th 1933: That day Jewish was just another
DH religious
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
MM We've decided to release a stable version with new major
MM additions at a cost of the nice release date, thus we will most
MM likely to release the new version in 2005.
I had to read that twice; the first time I read it as We've decided
to release
Hello Maxim,
A reminder of what Maxim Masiutin on TBBETA typed on:
15 December 2004 at 14:01:16 GMT +0100
MM We've decided to release a stable version with new major additions at a
MM cost of the nice release date, thus we will most likely to release the new
MM version in 2005.
At the risk
Hello Maxim,
A reminder of what Maxim Masiutin on TBBETA typed on:
15 December 2004 at 15:47:31 GMT +0100
MM It will be 3.xx
I noticed that your ignoring me :)
--
Best regards,Tony.
_
Message composed on
Hello Diego,
Friday, December 17, 2004, 7:54:10 AM, you wrote:
Looking at the points above, where does PINE falls?
If you cut them, they usually fall to the ground. :-)
SCNR!!
--
Best regards,
Alexandermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Shemming,
Thursday, December 16, 2004, 11:57:57, you wrote:
Is it just me or is anyone else noticing an increase in the amount of
spam that's fooling BayesIt?
Just keep feeding BayesIt with spam and ham continually, to keep it in good
shape :-)
--
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
PF (SpamPal plugin home
PF http://www.agentintelligent.com/P2Pplugin.html).
The site seems to be down.
- --
Stuart Hemming
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
Aided by BayesIt! 0.7.5, MyGate (v1.0) and rss2pop3
On Thursday 16 December 2004 11:54, Peter Fjelsten wrote:
For me the by far most effective is SpamPal - due to the combination of
Bayesian, peer-to-peer and public blacklists.
Since I started using MDaemon as my own mail server I've not seen any spam.
Mailwasher pro is very good.
--
Tony.
Hello you schmuck, answering yourself again?
on 16-Dez-2004 at 17:29 you (Alexander S. Kunz) wrote:
trying to open the Options menu after uninstalling BayesIt gives the
following AV:
--- The Bat! ---
Access violation at address 0081F051 in
Hello Peter!
On Thursday, December 16, 2004 at 7:33:18 PM you wrote:
Two: I'd like to have an option to save decrypted messages. Encryption
is fine for transmission, but I don't need them necessarily encrypted
on my computer. It was possible up to version 1.6? I think.
Wholeheartedly agree
Hello Alexander,
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 at 19:35:03 +0100, (which is
16.12.2004 at 20:35:03 +2000 where I live), you wrote:
creating/deleting a POP3 account is no problem here (no AVs).
No problems with creating/deleting POP3 accounts here either.
--
Best regards,
Zeynel
:flag-turkey:
Running
Hello Zeynel everyone else,
on 16-Dez-2004 at 19:19 you (Zeynel) wrote:
created a new (empty) IMAP account, no configuration except the absolute
minimum (as required by the new account wizard). Deleted the account
again, gives AV:
Confirmed with same addresses. Then I re-created an IMAP
Hello Zeynel everyone else,
on 16-Dez-2004 at 20:00 you (Zeynel) wrote:
I'm using the RTV; its configured to display sigs (those with a correct
sig delimiter *g*) in a different color. This works only with the
standard sig delimiter -- but not with the pgp delimiter - --.
Not confirmed,
Hi Dierk,
Doesn't make much sense if I send you a message with some
incriminating (lets imagine I live in Russia, Saudi-Arabia or China)
contents and you save a decrypted version.
If your hard drive is encrypted you don't have to think about stuff
like that :-)
--
I'm already gone,
Raymund
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bad sig?
- --
cheers,
Henk
__
Thunderbird 1.0 with Enigmail on Windows XP SP2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
Hello Alexander,
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 at 19:47:29 +0100, (which is
16.12.2004 at 20:47:29 +2000 where I live), you wrote:
I'm using the RTV; its configured to display sigs (those with a correct sig
delimiter *g*) in a different color. This works only with the standard sig
delimiter -- but not
Hello Zeynel everyone else,
on 16-Dez-2004 at 20:19 you (Zeynel) wrote:
Maybe Peter Meyns's PGP sig-limiter is malformed?
Seems so. But TB recognizes it when you reply. Odd.
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)
using TB! v3.0.2.10 Home on Windows XP Pro
Hello Alexander,
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 at 20:07:42 +0100, (which is
16.12.2004 at 21:07:42 +2000 where I live), you wrote:
Not confirmed, the setting applies both - -- and --
Sure? Please check the attached pictures. sig-std.png is your message (sig
in monospace font, light grey), sig-pgp is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Sean,
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 20:51:03 +GMT (16-12-2004, 21:51 +0100, where
I live), you wrote:
SR Thursday, December 16, 2004, 8:07:06 PM, you wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bad sig?
SR Good sig :)
SR Sean
It is
Hello Henk,
Thursday, December 16, 2004, 10:18:46 PM, you wrote:
Bad sig?
SR Good sig :)
SR Sean
It is a pity that all my good sigs come from Thunderbird and not from
the Bat! :-(
This one is good and I belive it came via TB!
Sean
--
ICQ: 679813 YAHOO: thecivvie
Jabber: [EMAIL
90 matches
Mail list logo
