Header Field Sender Failure

2004-09-06 Thread Bill McCarthy
Hello TB Beta List, My filter failed on a mail with this sender line: Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The filter used the NFS construct: Header field - sender v contains - comp.lang.forth (where the "v" is the little drop down box thingy) BTW, I got it to work with the following: Heade

Re: The Bat! 3.0.0.7 is now available

2004-09-06 Thread M i c C u l l e n
On Tuesday, September 7, 2004 @ 2:19:14 PM, Richard Wakeford wrote: [snips] MicCullen>> Your sig says you're using v3, so you're using a beta... Richard> No, version 3 on its own is a release version. It might be called that, indeed. -- cheers, Mic (reply address works) Money is a good serva

Re[2]: The Bat! 3.0.0.7 is now available

2004-09-06 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello M, On Tue, 7 Sep 2004 you wrote in MicCullen> Your sig says you're using v3, so you're using a beta... No, version 3 on its own is a release version. -- Regards, Richard | Using The Bat! 3.0.0.7 & SpamPal | Windows XP (build 2600), version 5. 1 Service Pack 1 | a

Re: The Bat! 3.0.0.7 is now available

2004-09-06 Thread Peter Fjelsten
Den, On 07-09-2004 05:40, you [DVY] wrote in : DVY> Where the decision of a problem with impossibility to receive mail DVY> with Microsoft Exchange servers? I have no problem here. Getting 10 mails a day this way as expected. WinXP, in domain. Exchange version I don't kno

Unxpected Crash pressing Reply bytton

2004-09-06 Thread Klimov Vova
Hello! Please take a look at screens: www.starsoft.org/tbat/thbeta_crash1.jpg www.starsoft.org/tbat/thbeta_crash2.jpg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Current beta is 3.00.07 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBU

Re[2]: The Bat! 3.0.0.7 is now available

2004-09-06 Thread Klimov Vova
Dennis>> I'm seeing 18,040k at the moment. DW> Just after my last email I was using 66mb. I closed it down and ran it DW> again -- started off at about 24mb, a minute or 2 later was at 22mb, and DW> is now at 33. 0% CPU load, about 8-12mb at all time <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: The Bat! 3.0.0.7 is now available

2004-09-06 Thread M i c C u l l e n
On Tuesday, September 7, 2004 @ 1:27:17 PM, Doug Weller wrote: [snips] Doug> Hm, yes TheBat! is taking from 0 to 98% memory use -- this seems to Doug> cycle. I can't tell what is happening. Two minutes ago while I was doing Doug> nothing with it it went up to 98%, now it is only 1 or 2% as I type

Re: The Bat! 3.0.0.7 is now available

2004-09-06 Thread Doug Weller
Hi Dennis, Monday, September 6, 2004, 8:51:03 PM, you wrote: Dennis> Matt: MT>> On Monday, September 6, 2004 @ 10:01:45 AM [-0700], 9Val wrote: >>> The Bat! 3.0.0.7 is now available from >>> http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/ MT>> I wonder, does everyone see The Bat! taking no upwards of 89% -

Re: The Bat! 3.0.0.7 is now available

2004-09-06 Thread Miroslav Florensen
Hello Krzysztof, > Not confirmed. I tryied this solution for my FF and this didn't work. > The same behaviour I noticed here with Mozilla 1.7.2 take a look at this site: http://johnhaller.com/jh/mozilla/firefox_bug_246078.asp -- best regards Miroslav BAT-MAIL.DE.VU - http://bat-mail.de.vu Ne

Re: The Bat! 3.0.0.7 is now available

2004-09-06 Thread Chris Weaven
Hi Manuel, On Monday, September 6, 2004 22:39 your local time, which was 21:39 my local time, Manuel Breitfeld [MB] wrote; MB> Stefan, Max, 9Val, is this really true? MB> Marketing-Manager of Kaspersky told me after he had been informed by MB> development, that plugin was developed by both, RIT a

Re: Problems with Connection Centre

2004-09-06 Thread Nick Andriash
Hello Martin, Monday, September 6, 2004, 1:17:55 PM, you wrote: > Are you using POP3 or IMAP? No, I'm using POP3 but it's behaving as if I were using IMAP. Another problem I seem to be having is that I cannot close TB because it says tasks are active... but there are no active tasks. It appears

Re: Now: Two copies of FF (Was :Re: The Bat! 3.0.0.7 is now available)

2004-09-06 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hello Plan9, on 06.09.2004 at 22:23 you wrote: P> Have you tried unticking the - "Use DDE" Box for the "URL:HyperText P> Transfer Protocol" ? P> My Computer -> Tools -> Folder Options -> File Types Yes, you're right. This known problem is also discussed in mozilla-forums and bugtracker. http://fo

Re: The Bat! 3.0.0.7 is now available

2004-09-06 Thread Manuel Breitfeld
Hello Marek Mikus, on 06.09.2004 at 21:05 you wrote: >> I was previously informed to get a working Kaspersky plug-in, I would >> have to switch to a previous version of TB! MM> This is comment from Stefan: MM> "This one cannot be fixed on our side because the AVP plug-in is MM> written and supp

Re: The Bat! 3.0.0.7 is now available

2004-09-06 Thread Johannes Posel
Hi there Matt, Going back 21:39 06.09.2004... > I wonder, does everyone see The Bat! taking no upwards of 89% - 95% of > their CPU constantly? Also, Peak Mem usage is at 108Megs almost > instantly on startup. Not confirmed. TB is running since around 2 hours, its CPU usage is 0 while not being f

Now: Two copies of FF (Was :Re: The Bat! 3.0.0.7 is now available)

2004-09-06 Thread Plan9
On 2004-09-06 (20:51) Krzysztof Kudlacik wrote: It's nothing related to The Bat really, see http://www.ritlabs.com/kb/idx/0/082/article/ Not confirmed. I tryied this solution for my FF and this didn't work. The same behaviour I noticed here with Mozilla 1.7.2 Have you tried unticking the - "Use

Re: The Bat! 3.0.0.7 is now available

2004-09-06 Thread Matt Thoene
On Monday, September 6, 2004 @ 12:39:13 PM [-0700], Matt Thoene wrote: > On Monday, September 6, 2004 @ 10:01:45 AM [-0700], 9Val wrote: >> The Bat! 3.0.0.7 is now available from >> http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/ > I wonder, does everyone see The Bat! taking no upwards of 89% - 95% of > their

Re: Problems with Connection Centre

2004-09-06 Thread Martin Webster
Hello Nick, On 06 September 2004, 13:02 -0700 (06/09/200421:02 local time) Nick Andriash [NA] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Anyway, try Options->Preferences->Display Connection Centre and select >> either Hide or Automatically. NA> That's the problem though... I have 'automatically' chose

Message list corruption

2004-09-06 Thread Martin Webster
Hello TBBETA, I haven't seen this for a while... but it's back since Version 3.0. When I scroll through the message list and/or close a thread the display is corrupt. Sometimes I see a duplicate message, sometimes two become one... see PNG. Has anyone else seen this? -- Best regards, Martin

Re: Problems with Connection Centre

2004-09-06 Thread Nick Andriash
Hello Martin, Monday, September 6, 2004, 12:52:32 PM, you wrote: > Anyway, try Options->Preferences->Display Connection Centre and select > either Hide or Automatically. That's the problem though... I have 'automatically' chosen, but once the messages have been downloaded, I'm still left with a

Re: Problems with Connection Centre

2004-09-06 Thread Dean
Hi Nick, Monday, September 6, 2004, 2:40:41 PM, you wrote: NA> I seem to be having problems with the CC in that once it has finished, it NA> still stays on top... does not close automatically once the download has NA> finished. Ahem, well so much for that thought. That last post was good

Re: Invalid HTML error

2004-09-06 Thread Michael Geyer
Hi Dierk and list, On Monday, September 6, 2004 at 21:31:00 GMT +0200 (which was 21:31 where I live) Dierk Haasis wrote (at least in parts) and made these valuable points on the subject of "Invalid HTML error": >> No - had a lot of such "HTML errors" on Win2k :-| > And none here, yet. Lucky you

Re: Problems with Connection Centre

2004-09-06 Thread Dean
Hi Nick, Monday, September 6, 2004, 2:40:41 PM, you wrote: NA> Hello TBBETA, NA> I seem to be having problems with the CC in that once it has finished, it NA> still stays on top... does not close automatically once the download has NA> finished. There must be a setting somewhere that I hav

Re: The Bat! 3.0.0.7 is now available

2004-09-06 Thread Krzysztof Kudlacik
On 2004-09-06 (20:51), you wrote: > It's nothing related to The Bat really, see > http://www.ritlabs.com/kb/idx/0/082/article/ Not confirmed. I tryied this solution for my FF and this didn't work. The same behaviour I noticed here with Mozilla 1.7.2 Best regards, Krzysztof Kudłacik -- pb _,

Re[3]: Invalid HTML error

2004-09-06 Thread Michael Schneider
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Salve Allen, DH>> On Monday, September 6, 2004 at 9:10:13 PM you wrote: >>> No - had a lot of such "HTML errors" on Win2k :-| DH>> And none here, yet. AD> Nor here. I had *one* only on 3.0.0.6, none on 3.0.0.0 and none on 3.0.0.7. Mike - -- As

Re[3]: The Bat! 3.0.0.7 is now available

2004-09-06 Thread Gary
Hello Guys, Monday, September 6, 2004, 12:35:07 PM, you wrote: >> Did you go to the second link in the list footer first? I was just >> there and downloaded the beta just fine. However it is very common >> for people to fall into the Beta Tester Registration Trap. The second >> link (http://ww

Invalid HTML error (was: The Bat! 3.0.0.7 is now available)

2004-09-06 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Peter, on Mon, 6 Sep 2004 19:27:56 +0200GMT, you wrote: 9>> Here is a short list of changes: PF> I wonder why you make a new version before you fix the mother of all PF> bugs - the HTML-error? That must be bugging all users with the RTV PF> several times each day. PF> It is not there in 3.0

Re[2]: The Bat! 3.0.0.7 is now available

2004-09-06 Thread Gary
Hello Scott, Monday, September 6, 2004, 12:30:31 PM, you wrote: G>> I cannot get into the site (access denied)... I have went through the G>> procedure of having it send me my password, going on line, changing it, G>> getting an acknowledgement, and I still cannot get in to the the beta... > Did

Re: The Bat! 3.0.0.7 is now available

2004-09-06 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello 9Val, 06-Sep-2004 19:01, you wrote: > [-] (#0003537) Out of memory creating a virtual folder (certain filter condition) Hmmm. I created that very VF again now (''adress book "xyz" contains "sender and first recipient"'') - it does not produce the Out Of Memory error anymore... but it does

Re: The Bat! 3.0.0.7 is now available

2004-09-06 Thread Scott Guthrie
Hello Gary, Monday, September 6, 2004, 12:26:54 PM, you wrote: G> I cannot get into the site (access denied)... I have went through the G> procedure of having it send me my password, going on line, changing it, G> getting an acknowledgement, and I still cannot get in to the the beta... Did you g

Re: The Bat! 3.0.0.7 is now available

2004-09-06 Thread Peter Fjelsten
9Val, On 06-09-2004 19:01, you [9] wrote in : 9> The Bat! 3.0.0.7 is now available from 9> http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/ 9> Here is a short list of changes: I wonder why you make a new version before you fix the mother of all bugs - the HTML-error? That must be bugging

Re: The Bat! 3.0.0.7 is now available

2004-09-06 Thread Gary
Hello 9Val, Monday, September 6, 2004, 12:01:45 PM, you wrote: > The Bat! 3.0.0.7 is now available from http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/ I cannot get into the site (access denied)... I have went through the procedure of having it send me my password, going on line, changing it, getting an ackno

Re: The Bat! Rant

2004-09-06 Thread Michael L. Wilson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Allen, On Mon, 6 Sep 2004, Allen mused about "The Bat! Rant" (at least in part): :pacsnip2a: AD> That seems . . . quite silly. :pacsnip2b: Indeed, it is, but every once in a while we need a little silliness. Agree? - -- :lurking: Michael L.

Registry Change in v3 / 7-Zip backup?

2004-09-06 Thread Greg Strong
Hello TBBETA, Has the registry keys changed in v3 so that the old command in my batch file for 7-Zip no longer works? regedit /e "%drvPm%\%srcdirPM%tbreg.reg" hkey_current_user\software\rit Doing a search in the registry on 'RIT' locates the above directory. (i.e. [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\rit

The Bat! 3.0.0.7 is now available

2004-09-06 Thread 9Val
Hello All, The Bat! 3.0.0.7 is now available from http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/ Here is a short list of changes: [-] (#0002400) String displayed incomplete in Connection Centre [-] (#0003532) Mail Chat Window opens when Chatmode is set to "no Chat" [-] (#0002984) Big difference creating VFs

NFS: subfilters puzzlement, and a few UI suggestions

2004-09-06 Thread MaXxX
Maybe I'm dumb, but could someone please explain the workings of the subfilters to me? Suppose I have this: Filter A Subfilter A1 Subfilter A2 Filter B I presume subfilters A1 and A2 are checked when filter A fires, right? What if A has "Continue processing" unchecked? Are the subfilter

Re: Error Moving Folders

2004-09-06 Thread David Elliott
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Salutation Alexander On 06 September 2004 at 17:36:28 +0200 (which was 16:36 where I live) Alexander S. Kunz emanated these words of wisdom DE Has any one tried renaming a folder ? >>> I tried both and it works without a problem. >> I get a str

Cannot use newly created account (was: CC still hangs after failed connection)

2004-09-06 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi all, on Sat, 4 Sep 2004 13:08:38 +0200GMT, I wrote: PM> my mailbox quota was exceeded last night due to the heavy traffic during PM> the last days, so I missed quite a number of messages. I set up MyGate PM> to get the missing messages via Gmane, but I must have set something PM> wrong, so tha

Re: OT: Test

2004-09-06 Thread Clive Taylor
Hello Lars, Monday, September 6, 2004, 9:56:02 AM, you wrote: > Last one, promised Thank you for your email. It will be actioned in due course -- Best regards, Clivemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Current b

Re: Address PIcker buttons?

2004-09-06 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Michael Geyer, 06-Sep-2004 17:22, you wrote: >> Using TB v3.0.0.6 (updated v2.12.00 to 3.0 to 3.0.0.6, that is no 2.13 >> betas in between) on an english Win XP Pro/SP2 here, no problems, >> characters are as expected... < << >> > > Do you use German interface language or English? Germ

Re: Error Moving Folders

2004-09-06 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello David Elliott, 06-Sep-2004 13:46, you wrote: DE>>> Has any one tried renaming a folder ? >> I tried both and it works without a problem. > I get a string of AV's on mine Dito, but only if a filter points to the folder. Same when I delete a folder. Maybe someone can verify this. It was a

Re: NFS: Big question for 9Val

2004-09-06 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Peter, On Mon, 6 Sep 2004 16:33:49 +0200 GMT (06/09/2004, 21:33 +0700 GMT), Peter Palmreuther wrote: PP> But we're not about to vote for water flowing upstream, but if we PP> redirect the river on the left or on the right side of your planned PP> building. Some people say "it's always been

Re: Catch all filter

2004-09-06 Thread Dean
Hi, Monday, September 6, 2004, 3:31:41 AM, you wrote: D>>> It appears Contains, Contains any of, have been used by some as D>>> match and match any of with success. Richard>> There certainly seems to be a multitude of ways of differentiating Richard>> between conditions and I just wish someone

Delete an attachment via NFS

2004-09-06 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello tbbeta, I just connected TB v3 to our Exchange server via IMAP - works good so far (only I am totally unfamiliar with IMAP *g*) Question: s there a way to delete (not extract) an attachment? I see that the NFS allows matching a filename, but there is no action to "delete attachment" ... do

Re: Catch all filter

2004-09-06 Thread M i c C u l l e n
On Monday, September 6, 2004 @ 4:13:41 PM, Richard Wakeford wrote: [snips] D>> It appears Contains, Contains any of, have been used by some as D>> match and match any of with success. Richard> There certainly seems to be a multitude of ways of differentiating Richard> between conditions and I j

NFS: Old filter not working

2004-09-06 Thread Marcus Ohlström
In the OFS, I had a filter triggering on Sender matching abc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (I don't remember the correct terminology and I do not have the OFS available anymore to look it up, but I think you understand what I mean). When converted to the NFS, it looked like Sender contain abc <[EMA

Re[2]: Catch all filter

2004-09-06 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Dean, On Mon, 6 Sep 2004 you wrote in D> I ended up editing the \b, I had to rewrite the filter, snip D> It appears Contains, Contains any of, have been used by some as D> match and match any of with success. There certainly seems to be a multitude of way

Re: Catch all filter

2004-09-06 Thread M i c C u l l e n
On Monday, September 6, 2004 @ 3:48:00 PM, Richard Wakeford wrote: [snips] RW>> That's one I'd like to know how to do too. In my blacked filter before RW>> NFS I had words encased in "[]" separated by "|". On converting to NFS RW>> they are now encased in "|b" with the same separator but don't se

Strange NFS editing problem

2004-09-06 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello, This has happened several times whilst editing my rather large "Blacked" filter. On trying to get it working I have done lots of editing on its 25 lines of "Contains" or "Contains any of" conditions. After about a dozen editing actions (for instance removing the "\b") the particular filter

Re: Catch all filter

2004-09-06 Thread Dean
Hi Richard, Monday, September 6, 2004, 2:19:46 AM, you wrote: RW> Hello Stuart, RW> On Sun, 5 Sep 2004 you wrote in RW> Snip RW> That's one I'd like to know how to do too. In my blacked filter before RW> NFS I had words encased in "[]" separated by "|". On converting to N

Re[4]: Catch all filter

2004-09-06 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Richard, On Mon, 6 Sep 2004 you wrote in RW> That's one I'd like to know how to do too. In my blacked filter before RW> NFS I had words encased in "[]" separated by "|". On converting to NFS RW> they are now encased in "|b" with the same separator but don't seem to R

Re[3]: TheBat! 3.0.0.6 Post Release is now available

2004-09-06 Thread Denis
Hello Alexander, Sunday, September 5, 2004, 10:02:01 PM, you wrote: D>> but even basic http:// links still D>> open twice for me using Firefox 0.9.3 > It's nothing related to The Bat really, see > http://www.ritlabs.com/kb/idx/0/082/article/ Thanks very much. It indeed solved the problem. Of c

Re: Catch all filter

2004-09-06 Thread Bill McCarthy
On Sun 5-Sep-04 4:38pm -0400, Stuart Cuddy wrote: > How do you separate the different choices for "Contains any of". > My guess is that one of these is too aggressive and is acting on and > deleting more than it is meant to. I've tried listing the choices. Hitting after each address resizes the

Re[3]: 3.0.0.6: bugs

2004-09-06 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all, Monday, September 6, 2004, Alexander Leschinsky wrote: RW>> Unfortunately I can quickly confirm that. > Was BT record reopened? Or I have to do it? please don't reopen report 0003463, it is another problem and this is fixed. -- Bye Marek Mikus Czech support of The Bat! http://www.t

Re[3]: 3.0.0.6: bugs

2004-09-06 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Alexander, On Mon, 6 Sep 2004 you wrote in RW>> Unfortunately I can quickly confirm that. AL> Was BT record reopened? Or I have to do it? Sorry but you've lost me there :-( -- Regards, Richard | Using The Bat! 3.0 & SpamPal | Windows XP (build 2600), version 5. 1