30 December 2006 - 17:29
Hello Gene,
Friday, December 29, 2006, 5:26:42 PM, you wrote:
MP http://www.antispamsniper.com/
G Thanks! It looks like it may be a keeper!
Another fan here. It rarely makes a mistake and no apparent hit on
performance.
--
Best regards,
William
Flying with The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Greetings,
I've been using the latest release (3.95.6) for several days now, and
all of a sudden my BayesIt has gone missing. I can't swear it was
there when I installed the latest version, since I also use K-9, which
catches almost all spam. I
Hi Richard,
on Fri, 29 Dec 2006 07:57:57 -0500GMT (29.12.2006, 13:57 +0100GMT here),
you wrote:
RHS Greetings,
RHS I've been using the latest release (3.95.6) for several days now, and
RHS all of a sudden my BayesIt has gone missing.
Here is what Maxim Masiutin wrote about this topic on TBBeta
Hello Richard,
Friday, December 29, 2006, 7:57:57 AM, you wrote:
RHS -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
RHS Hash: SHA256
RHS Greetings,
RHS I've been using the latest release (3.95.6) for several days now, and
RHS all of a sudden my BayesIt has gone missing. I can't swear it was
RHS there when
Hello Peter,
Friday, December 29, 2006, 8:41:57 AM, you wrote:
PM Hi Richard,
PM on Fri, 29 Dec 2006 07:57:57 -0500GMT (29.12.2006, 13:57 +0100GMT here),
PM you wrote:
RHS Greetings,
RHS I've been using the latest release (3.95.6) for several days now, and
RHS all of a sudden my BayesIt has
Hello Gene,
Friday, December 29, 2006, 15:53:07, you wrote:
Yes, the installation of (3.95.6) seems to delete all files associated
with BayesIt except bayeslogger.exe.
No, it only deletes the program files of BayesIt, not the database of spam/ham
messages.
We have removed BayesIt because
Hallo Richard,
On Fri, 29 Dec 2006 07:57:57 -0500GMT (29-12-2006, 13:57 , where I
live), you wrote:
RHS I've been using the latest release (3.95.6) for several days now, and
RHS all of a sudden my BayesIt has gone missing. I can't swear it was
RHS there when I installed the latest version
Hello Maxim,
Friday, December 29, 2006, 9:25:04 AM, you wrote:
MM Hello Gene,
MM Friday, December 29, 2006, 15:53:07, you wrote:
Yes, the installation of (3.95.6) seems to delete all files associated
with BayesIt except bayeslogger.exe.
MM No, it only deletes the program files of BayesIt
Hello Gene,
Friday, December 29, 2006, 4:33:30 PM, you wrote:
G Upon installation I am prompted that, Unregistered version of product
G includes TMAgent software that displays advertisements when you search
G Web. To disable the advertisements, please buy license and activate
G your copy.
G
Hello Gene,
Friday, December 29, 2006, 17:33:30, you wrote:
I started looking on Ritlabs.com and found that no
anti-spam software was really current...
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/thebat/plugin/detail.php?ID=1463phrase_id=35322
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/thebat/plugin/plugins.php
Dear Gene,
Upon installation I am prompted that, Unregistered version of product
includes TMAgent software that displays advertisements when you search
Web. To disable the advertisements, please buy license and activate
your copy.
In fact I registered my copy AGAVA and tmasrv.exe is still
Hello Maxim,
Friday, December 29, 2006, 11:15:59 AM, you wrote:
I started looking on Ritlabs.com and found that no
anti-spam software was really current...
MM
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/thebat/plugin/detail.php?ID=1463phrase_id=35322
No updates since August 28, 2005?
MM
and only occasionally does a spam get into my
mail box.
A much better experience than I had with BayesIt, and I thought it
well worth the money.
--
Best regards,
Graham mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! v3.85.03 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Service Pack 2
training for a couple of days, I only very rarely get a good
GS email labelled as spam and only occasionally does a spam get into my
GS mail box.
GS A much better experience than I had with BayesIt, and I thought it
GS well worth the money.
Thanks! You are the second person to suggest this program
Hello Akebono,
Friday, December 29, 2006, 11:18:51 AM, you wrote:
ATS Dear Gene,
Upon installation I am prompted that, Unregistered version of product
includes TMAgent software that displays advertisements when you search
Web. To disable the advertisements, please buy license and activate
Hello Mark,
Friday, December 29, 2006, 10:47:34 AM, you wrote:
MP Hello Gene,
MP Friday, December 29, 2006, 4:33:30 PM, you wrote:
G Upon installation I am prompted that, Unregistered version of product
G includes TMAgent software that displays advertisements when you search
G Web. To disable
Friday, December 29, 2006, Gene wrote:
SpamPal If you think I do poor German, then imagine what a mess
I am with *anything* using the Cyrillic alphabet
Hopefully, the world is a nice place and the Russian page should be
roughly equivalent to the official TB-info from SpamPal
Hello Urban,
Friday, December 29, 2006, 12:49:40 PM, you wrote:
U Friday, December 29, 2006, Gene wrote:
SpamPal If you think I do poor German, then imagine what a mess
I am with *anything* using the Cyrillic alphabet
U Hopefully, the world is a nice place and the Russian page
Hi Gene,
Friday, December 29, 2006, 4:55:45 PM, you wrote:
AntispamSniper looks like a viable product! I'm trying it now
I've used AntispamSniper for quite a few months now and my experience
has been quite good. Looking at my stats, I've received 33454 messages
and the error rate is 1.55%,
Roelof,
Friday, December 29, 2006, 8:35:28 AM, you wrote:
RO The BayesIt plug-in is no longer included. It can be downloaded
RO separately from:
RO http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/bayesit/bayesit.msi
Thanks. I guess I should read release notes more thoroughly. I don't
depend on BayesIt
Hi Gene,
on Fri, 29 Dec 2006 11:55:45 -0500GMT (29.12.2006, 17:55 +0100GMT here),
you wrote:
G K9 No updates since April 18, 2004?
So what? It works very well. I only replaced it by AntiSpamSniper
(free version) because I preferred a plugin to an extra application
working as a proxy.
Hello Richard H. Stoddard everyone else,
on 29-Dez-2006 at 20:19 you (Richard H. Stoddard) wrote:
K9 has proved to be remarkably accurate (99.6% typically, with only a
false positive every few months)
Are you sure it is a false positive, ie. a legitimate message being
falsely classified as
Hello Peter Meyns everyone else,
on 29-Dez-2006 at 20:53 you (Peter Meyns) wrote:
G K9 No updates since April 18, 2004?
So what? It works very well.
I just wanted to say the same. ;-)
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de)
You cannot kill time without injuring eternity. --
Hello Alexander,
Friday, December 29, 2006, 4:31:31 PM, you wrote:
ASK Hello Peter Meyns everyone else,
ASK on 29-Dez-2006 at 20:53 you (Peter Meyns) wrote:
G K9 No updates since April 18, 2004?
So what? It works very well.
ASK I just wanted to say the same. ;-)
I guess it would be
Alexander,
Friday, December 29, 2006, 4:30:17 PM, you wrote:
ASK Are you sure it is a false positive, ie. a legitimate message being
ASK falsely classified as spam?
Definitely - I check the log daily, and once in awhile something gets
tagged. It happens so rarely it isn't a problem, especially
Hello all,
Thursday, July 13, 2006, Bill McCarthy wrote:
I had been using Bayesit! for a few years with fairly good
success on my laptop. About two months ago, my laptop
developed a hardware problem and I switched to my wife's
desktop (XP Pro SP2).
I have been training Bayesit! from
MM try AntispamSniper plugin, which is available in free version now too:
MM www.antispamsniper.com
Well if we are mentioning alternatives .. agava's Bat plugin works
great for me.
--
Best regards,
MikeDmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! v3.81.07 Beta on
Hello TB Users and Beta Lists,
I had been using Bayesit! for a few years with fairly good
success on my laptop. About two months ago, my laptop
developed a hardware problem and I switched to my wife's
desktop (XP Pro SP2).
I have been training Bayesit! from scratch and have had it
catch nothing
I have been training Bayesit! from scratch and have had it
catch nothing :-(
Turning on logging, I discovered that Bayesit! appeared a
bit confused.
That was just a few days ago and Bayesit! has still not
found any spam (I guess training is just starting now).
I tried BayesIT again
On Thu 13-Jul-06 2:33pm -0600, Marten Gallagher wrote:
I tried BayesIT again recently and found it getting things totally wrong -
it ended up 'refusing' to classify anything in one email account.
After taking advice from this list a while back - I am now using K9 with
absolutely wonderfully
...I am now using K9
Thanks for the advice. Does it work with X-Ray?
Dunno - but here's the site...
http://keir.net/k9_faq.html
I don;t use X-Ray any more - got my own SMTP server arrangement so don't
need to switch servers when around and about.
and I guess you know the X-Ray support
I have spent two days now feeding BayesIT and adjsuting the limits etc.
I have imported a whitelist and added to it, I have the regex filters
installed, I have imported a blacklist.
Still it fails to pick up half of the spams arriving.
Are tohers more successful with theior installations
Hello Marten,
Thursday, May 18, 2006, 1:58:32 PM, you wrote:
MG I have spent two days now feeding BayesIT and adjsuting the limits etc.
MG I have imported a whitelist and added to it, I have the regex filters
MG installed, I have imported a blacklist.
MG Still it fails to pick up half
Hello Marten,
Thursday, May 18, 2006, 1:58:32 PM, you wrote:
MG I have spent two days now feeding BayesIT and adjsuting the limits etc.
MG I have imported a whitelist and added to it, I have the regex filters
MG installed, I have imported a blacklist.
MG Still it fails to pick up half
Hello Marten,
Thursday, May 18, 2006, 1:58:32 PM, you wrote:
MG I have spent two days now feeding BayesIT and adjsuting the limits etc.
MG I have imported a whitelist and added to it, I have the regex filters
MG installed, I have imported a blacklist.
MG Still it fails to pick up half
The nice little BayesIt icons to Mark as Junk or Mark as Good
(probably not the right wording) disappeared after my most recent
upgrade. Can anyone tell me how to restore them?
Thanks in advance.
--
Best,
M-K
Using The Bat! v3.80.06 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Service Pack 2
I am having a bit of trouble getting BayesIt sorted out
I have a whitelist into which I placed all Good email address but BayesIT
seems to have prepended each line with TEXT:
Does that mean it is looking in the body of the email for that?
In which case do I just change the TEXT: to say FROM
and specified the minimum value in TB! preferences, but it
M continues to ask me on startup.
Did you configure BayesIt properly? (Told it where to find its files?)
M PS: I posted this via the gmane web interface, which is the reason I didn't
M include the signature cut mark. I'll do it manually this time
Roelof Otten [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Did you configure BayesIt properly? (Told it where to find its files?)
That was the problem. It seems that when you tell the installer to move the MAIL
directory elsewhere, Bayesit will still think its configuration information is
in the default MAIL
Hi all,
Today I upgraded to the latest version of TB! and enabled on-the-fly encryption.
Now when I start TB!, I am prompted to enter the OFTE password. After doing so,
I receive 2 warning notices related to Bayesit.
The first says: It seems that you use encrypted The Bat! Please, provide
!)
Well, it's correct about you using an encrypted message base, so just
do what it tells you to do. I can remember having to do the same when
I started with OTFE, back then I was still using BayesIt.
M Does anyone have any idea on what I need to do to get rid of these messages?
My
M searches have
Hallo Max,
On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 12:13:39 + (UTC)GMT (11-2-2006, 13:13 +0200,
where I live), you wrote:
M Does anyone have any idea on what I need to do to get rid of these messages?
My
M searches have yielded nothing.
M Thanks!
M
M Current
Roelof Otten [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, it's correct about you using an encrypted message base, so just
do what it tells you to do. I can remember having to do the same when
I started with OTFE, back then I was still using BayesIt.
I should have been clearer in my original message
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 11:34:45 -0500, MikeD (2) wrote:
Yes, I just registered my copy a couple of days ago. In most ways it
works better than BayesIt, but I still get more false positives with it
than with BayesIt. But I am still tweeking the settings g
What settings are you currently using
: Yes
B Use the common junk folder: No
The only difference I have is my junk score is currently up to 15. I
had it down into the single digits for BayesIt g I have been
sneaking it up, but slowly. Just one or two points a week.
--
Best regards,
MikeDmailto:[EMAIL
that not much mail is getting to the actual BayesIt filter to
be counted. Having said that, would have expected some info there. I
can send you a copy of my stat.bin if you think that might help. Or
uninstall / reinstall the plug in might help. My stat.bin is a binary
file, so there may be a required
Hello Barry,
Thursday, January 12, 2006, 12:58:48 AM, you wrote:
B Well, I've taken your lead and installed a copy of AGAVA for a trial. And I
B have to say that first impressions are pretty favourable. I trained it up
B with my batch of spam emails and its working very well.
Ive been using it
BayesIt, but I still get more false positives with
it than with BayesIt. But I am still tweeking the settings g
--
Best regards,
MikeDmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! v3.65 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Service Pack 2
Hi
I've noticed that BayesIt doesn't seem to be saving any stats.
Has anyone else noticed this or can anyone suggest a fix?
--
Best regards
Barry
barryh'at'kentra'dot'co'dot'uk
Using TheBat! version 3.64.01 (Christmas Edition)
and BayesIt! 0.8.4 Release
Hello Barry,
Wednesday, January 11, 2006, 6:43:22 AM, you wrote:
B Hi
B I've noticed that BayesIt doesn't seem to be saving any stats.
B Has anyone else noticed this or can anyone suggest a fix?
I can't look at the moment 'cuz I am currently testing out AGAVA. But
I seem to recall seeing
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 08:02:25 -0500, MikeD (2) wrote:
But I wasn't particularly 'religious' about checking the stats. I was
more interested in the results g
Well, for sure, but I've been running 'FileMon' and it seems to me that
BayesIt isn't working quite right. It seems as if it tries to open
that
B BayesIt isn't working quite right. It seems as if it tries to open
B ~stat.bin as well as stat.bin. Unfortunately ~stat.bin doesn't exist. I
B tried making a copy of stat.bin and renaming it to ~stat.bin but BayesIt
B just deletes it at the end of the session.
B If I remove both files
Barry @ 1/11/2006 5:43:22 AM
No Bayesit Stats mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Has anyone else noticed this or can anyone suggest a fix?
This is a shot in the dark. Are the permissions on the stats file
correct?
--
Chris
Quoting when replying to this message is good for you and me.
Using The Bat
be at crossed purposes here. :)
My filtering is working very well. I use whitelist and blacklist
extensively and this seems to be the best approach.
I just sometimes look at the stats for interest and was surprised to see
that Bayesit was reporting 'nil' spam! This got me thinking and that's when
digging
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 09:57:43 -0600, Chris wrote:
This is a shot in the dark. Are the permissions on the stats file
correct?
As far as I can tell.
FileMon shows that Bayesit is accessing the file to read it but just
doesn't seem to write anything. But I don't know whether this file
stat.bin
approach.
B I just sometimes look at the stats for interest and was surprised to see
B that Bayesit was reporting 'nil' spam! This got me thinking and that's when
B digging deeper I noticed the apparent issue with the 'stat.bin' file?
Ahh, I get it now. My explanation of the behavior
Hello tbudl,
This may sound like a really dumb question, but I downloaded the rar
for the BayseIt plug in, and expanded it. How do I install it?
--
Best regards,
lists
Success is to be measured not so much by the position that one has reached in
life as by the obstacles which he has
much which). Let's
take \Program Files\Tbe Bat!\BayesIt\ (just because that's what I'm
using.)
Now via TB's menu:
Options - Preferences - Protection\Anti SPAM - Add
Browse to the location where you stored BayesIt
Configure BayesIt with the matching button and you're about done.
When you've
Hello Roelof,
Tuesday, August 30, 2005, 9:23:09 AM, you wrote:
RO Extract them to a random directory (doesn't matter much which). Let's
RO take \Program Files\Tbe Bat!\BayesIt\ (just because that's what I'm
RO using.)
RO Now via TB's menu:
RO Options - Preferences - Protection\Anti SPAM - Add
On 8/21/05, Jeff Gaines [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I found BayesIt very poor even after training. I have switched to K9
now and find it much better.
AOL that.
I've never gotten BayesIt to work, and I'm not the most
computer-illiterate person out there. When c't Magazin (renowned
German computer
Hello Jeff,
Sunday, August 21, 2005, 11:21:58 PM, you wrote:
JG I found BayesIt very poor even after training. I have switched to K9
JG now and find it much better.
And, for a flipside, I've found it great. As an example,one of my
accounts had 68 messages in it when I returned home tonight. One
Jeff Gaines said...
Hello Group
On Sunday, August 21, 2005, 8:33:48 PM, P. wrote:
So, BayseIt is definitely not working. I've tweaked the settings and
guess I'll wait for the onslaught of spam on Monday to see if that
helps.
I found BayesIt very poor even after training. I have
Hello Feli,
On Saturday, August 20, 2005, , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PJ I recently reinstalled TB! and wanted to try the spam plugin, Bayesit.
PJ This program is not working well at all...
FW did you also train BayesIt with Ham? Additionally you can use the
FW whitelist to prevent listmails
Hello Group
On Sunday, August 21, 2005, 8:33:48 PM, P. wrote:
So, BayseIt is definitely not working. I've tweaked the settings and
guess I'll wait for the onslaught of spam on Monday to see if that
helps.
I found BayesIt very poor even after training. I have switched to K9
now and find
Hello,
I recently reinstalled TB! and wanted to try the spam plugin, Bayesit.
This program is not working well at all; I trained it with over
3,000 spam messages, yet these are still routinely delivered into my
inbox with very few ending up in the junk folder. I am using the
default settings.
I
Hallo Pat,
On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 11:30:33 -0500GMT (20-8-2005, 18:30 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
PJ I recently reinstalled TB! and wanted to try the spam plugin, Bayesit.
PJ This program is not working well at all; I trained it with over
PJ 3,000 spam messages, yet these are still routinely
Hello Pat,
On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 11:30:33 -0500GMT P.Johnson wrote:
PJ I recently reinstalled TB! and wanted to try the spam plugin, Bayesit.
PJ This program is not working well at all; I trained it with over
PJ 3,000 spam messages, yet these are still routinely delivered into my
PJ inbox
Hello Feli,
On Saturday, August 20, 2005, , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PJ I recently reinstalled TB! and wanted to try the spam plugin, Bayesit.
PJ This program is not working well at all; I trained it with over
PJ 3,000 spam messages, yet these are still routinely delivered into my
PJ inbox
Hi Roelof,
On Saturday, August 20, 2005, , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PJ I recently reinstalled TB! and wanted to try the spam plugin, Bayesit.
PJ This program is not working well at all; I trained it with over
PJ 3,000 spam messages, yet these are still routinely delivered into my
PJ inbox
Hi
I just downloaded build 30 from the Ritlabs web site and installed over my
copy of build 25 and Bayesit 0.8.1
For some reason the installer removed my copy of Bayesit but didn't replace
it. I tried installing a downloaded copy of Bayesit but its only 0.8.0 and
when I tried running
putting the Bayesit function back, Maxim has said that
v. 3.51 will be placed on the public download page.
--
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat! beta 3.51 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2
Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http
Hello Barry,
Friday, July 8, 2005, 2:36:40 AM, you wrote:
B Hi
B I just downloaded build 30 from the Ritlabs web site and installed over my
B copy of build 25 and Bayesit 0.8.1
B For some reason the installer removed my copy of Bayesit but didn't replace
B it. I tried installing a downloaded
Hello Barry,
B I just downloaded build 30 from the Ritlabs web site and installed over my
B copy of build 25 and Bayesit 0.8.1
B For some reason the installer removed my copy of Bayesit but didn't replace
B it. I tried installing a downloaded copy of Bayesit but its only 0.8.0 and
B when I tried
It's a piece of crap... I should have made a Hungarian description for
the 0.8.1, I have tried to install new LNG file, no success at me and
some other buddies. At some guy it has changed to Hungarian, but after
restart, it is English again.
Was it ever tested?
--
Vili
ON Thursday, May 26, 2005, 10:08:08 AM, you wrote:
B Copy and Paste the following REGEX expressions into the Bayesit
B blacklist.txt file in your BayesIt folder. You'll find the list below my
Hi Barry,
Don't you mean the filters.txt file ?
--
Best regards,
Gerard
On Thu, 26 May 2005 13:17:24 +0200, Gerard wrote:
ON Thursday, May 26, 2005, 10:08:08 AM, you wrote:
B Copy and Paste the following REGEX expressions into the Bayesit
B blacklist.txt file in your BayesIt folder. You'll find the list below my
Hi Barry,
Don't you mean the filters.txt file
Hello Group
On Thursday, May 26, 2005, 9:08:08 AM, Barry wrote:
[snipped]
Many thanks Vili, MikeD and Barry.
I switched to BayesFilter and I'm training it. For some reason TB! is
not retaining this add in between sessions, I have to keep adding it at
the start of a session, although it seems
ON Thursday, May 26, 2005, 1:36:47 PM, you wrote:
B On Thu, 26 May 2005 13:17:24 +0200, Gerard wrote:
ON Thursday, May 26, 2005, 10:08:08 AM, you wrote:
B Copy and Paste the following REGEX expressions into the Bayesit
B blacklist.txt file in your BayesIt folder. You'll find the list below my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jeff,
On Thu, 26 May 2005 13:11:05 +0100 (8:11 AM here), Jeff Gaines [JG]
wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
JG I switched to BayesFilter and I'm training it. For some reason TB!
JG is not retaining this add in between sessions, I have to keep
JG
Hello Group
On Thursday, May 26, 2005, 2:31:56 PM, Kevin wrote:
Close The Bat! and locate and edit this file with your favorite text
editor:
Thank you Kevin, that seems to have done it:-)
Now for some more training...
--
Jeff Gaines Damerham Hampshire UK
:Jeff_Gaines:
I'm going through the junk folder un-deleting
JG stuff that isn't junk :-(
JG Any recommendations as to the best way to make it a bit less
JG aggressive?
Yes: start to use BayesFilter. The newer and newer BayesIt always
comes out with errors. Our observation is that the errors are fixed
that mistake when I first tried BayesIt. If you only give it spam,
then it had no idea what a Good message looks like, so everything
will look like spam to it. It needs at least as much ham as spam
for training.
Beyond that, go to OPtion, Preferences, Anti-spam and select Baysit
Try adjusting
Hello Ritlabs and all,
We have translated v0.81 BayesIt to Hungarian. But there is an annoying
thing:
If we change the language back to English, it is not possible to
change it back to Hungarian. If I delete the
[Plugins]
Count=1
Plugin #1=E:\Data\The Bat!\bayesit\bayesit.tbp
[Plugin Data
Hello Group
I'm still struggling a bit with this plugin (v 0.8.1).
It seems to regard everything as spam except this list, which I've
managed to whitelist. It's a pain because I am selling my first item
on eBay and I'm getting some questions. Instead of going through my
inbox and deleting junk
Hello Alexander,
On Thursday, April 21, 2005, you wrote:
It's slow during mail retrieval, which is OK because it's doing lots
of thinking (pathetic fallacy?)
ASK K9 does the same thinking and its blazingly fast
OK - sold. Thanks for the advice, K9's installed and doing a pretty
good job as
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 01:11:08 +0200, Robin Anson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What version of Popfile are you using? I have been using it for some
years now, and have never noticed it slowing - what is it that you see
happening?
PopFile itself is achingly slow. :-}
--
Gruesse / Greetings,
Alexander
Hello Robin,
On Thursday, April 21, 2005, you wrote:
RA What version of Popfile are you using?
I'm on the latest - v0.22.2.
RA I have been using it for some years now, and have never noticed it
RA slowing - what is it that you see happening?
It's slow during mail retrieval, which is OK because
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 09:57:53 +0200, Nick Dutton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's slow during mail retrieval, which is OK because it's doing lots
of thinking (pathetic fallacy?)
K9 does the same thinking and its blazingly fast during mail retrieval
(hardly noticable there's anything in-between TB
Hi
On Wednesday 20 April 2005 at 7:54:21 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Philip Storry
wrote:
Because of those blank emails, I added the Bayes Filter Plugin as a
second plugin. You can find that here: http://www.lkcc.org/achim
It's good, and I chose it because unlike BayesIt (as far as I know
Thursday, April 21, 2005, MFPA wrote:
RBL lookups?
http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/R/RBL.html
--
Urban
It would be terrible if the Red Cross Bloodmobile got into an accident.
No, wait. That would be good because if anyone needed it, the blood
would be right there
Hi
On Thursday 21 April 2005 at 2:56:10 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Urban wrote:
RBL lookups?
http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/R/RBL.html
Thanks
--
Best regards,
MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack
Hello Alexander,
On 21 April 2005 at 10:38:07 GMT +0200 (which was 10:38:07 where I
live), Alexander S. Kunz wrote and made these valuable points on the
subject of Bayesit - how does it mark a message as spam?:
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 09:57:53 +0200, Nick Dutton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's slow
the server once identified.
Aside from the fact that mails are put into a spam folder by bayesit,
I can't find any other sign in the message. Is this so?
--
Nick
TheBat!: v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Current version
of accuracy.
ND One of the things that I really like about popfile is that I can get
ND TB to delete spam from the server once identified.
ND Aside from the fact that mails are put into a spam folder by bayesit,
ND I can't find any other sign in the message. Is this so?
I'd like to know this also. How
Hello Nick,
Wednesday, April 20, 2005, 3:58:37 PM, you wrote:
ND Aside from the fact that mails are put into a spam folder by
ND bayesit, I can't find any other sign in the message. Is this so?
As far as I can tell, TB doesn't mark the message at all - which I
personally find quite
Hello Nick Dutton everyone else,
on 20-Apr-2005 at 16:58 you (Nick Dutton) wrote:
Aside from the fact that mails are put into a spam folder by bayesit,
I can't find any other sign in the message. Is this so?
Exactly.
If you're only using PopFile for spam filtering, may I suggest to have
On Thu 21 April 2005, 0:58:37 +1000, Nick Dutton wrote:
I'm going through one of my irregular explorations of anti-SPAM
technology, as popfile just seems to grind slower and slower. Although
it must be said that it's almost perfect in terms of accuracy.
What version of Popfile are you using? I
uninstalled the plugin, deleted all
BayesIt files, and then downloaded and installed the latest
version (not the one that comes with 2.12.00).
I didn't realise that there is a different procedure for installing
the plugin now, Through Options-Preferences-Protection-Antispam
rather than Options
the problem from
M3 reoccurring either.
SF I did this and it worked. I uninstalled the plugin, deleted all
SF BayesIt files, and then downloaded and installed the latest
SF version (not the one that comes with 2.12.00).
SF I didn't realise that there is a different procedure for installing
SF
Hello Scott,
Wednesday, March 30, 2005, 1:35:59 PM, you wrote:
SF Hello MikeD,
SF Wednesday, March 30, 2005, 5:08:46 AM, you wrote:
M3 I would be interested in hearing what (if anything) you find out.
SF It seems to be 2 accounts (rest OK) and the problem is
SF consistent, ie the mail is
1 - 100 of 631 matches
Mail list logo
